DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution of Retinal Detachment Surgery Down the Ages Bikramjit P Pal1 and Kumar Saurabh2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution of Retinal Detachment Surgery Down the Ages Bikramjit P Pal1 and Kumar Saurabh2 Major Review Evolution of retinal detachment surgery down the ages Bikramjit P Pal1 and Kumar Saurabh2 1,2Associate consultant, “Treatment of retinal detachment associated with osmotic agents were also injected into the subcon- Consultant, retinal holes should not be urged except in only junctival space in the hope of reduction of SRF. Vitreoretinal Services, eyes as a last clutch at a straw of hope”. These These included saline, gelatin, cane sugar, glycer- Sankara Nethralaya, Kolkata, India lines by Lister from 1927 and the famous survey ine and mercury salts. by Vail a decade prior (1912),1 which found a A ray of hope appeared when Leber and success rate of retinal detachment (RD) as 1 in Nordenson2 put forward their theory of vitreous Correspondence: 1000 speaks for themselves, suggest a grave prog- traction in the genesis of RD. They postulated that Bikramjit P Pal, nosis for RD. Although the current success rate in the alterations in vitreous generated secondary KamalNayan Bajaj Sankara managing uncomplicated RDs is greater than 90%, traction on the equatorial retina forming retinal Nethralaya, tears with RD. This concept was of paramount NewTown, Rajarahat, the journey has been the most intriguing with the Kolkata, India. emergence of many heroes. One such hero who importance as we know today but alas it met with Email: [email protected] stands apart is Jules Gonin, whose patience and severe resistance and criticism. Treatment aiming perseverance have led to the current understand- to relieve vitreous traction was introduced by likes ing and treatment of RD as we know it. The evolu- of Deutschmann (who did the same by using Von tion of RD surgery has always been divided into Graefe knife). ‘Pre-Gonin’ and the ‘Post-Gonin’ phases. With no Various non-surgical manoeuvres were also intent to change the same, we hereby briefly employed. Samelsohn1 insisted on bilateral com- describe the evolution of RD surgery as it pression bandages with bed rest with idea of unfolded. increasing intraocular pressure. Dietary modifica- tions with salt restriction were another treatment Pre-Gonin era (before 1920) on offer. Although retinal break was known to be asso- ciated with RD, the focus was solely on RD with Jules Gonin and methods of retinopexy no attention to the causative break. Various the- Jules Gonin (1870–1935) legacy in history of RD ories were put forward and treatment was direc- dares to show how ones persistence and persever- ted towards them. The first theory talked about ance can change an idea. Taking Leber and RD as being spontaneous with the main culprit Nordenson’s idea ahead with two decades of being abnormal leakage from choroid. Breaks in experimentation and self-belief, Gonin proved the retina were thought as a result of increased pres- role of retinal break in the pathogenesis of RD. He sure from fluid generated behind the retina. This introduced a procedure called as ‘Ignipuncture’ led to treatments in the form of scleral and whereby retinal breaks were painstakingly loca- retinal puncture to relieve the pressure. Various lized pre- and intraoperatively (not an easy task treatments were directed towards draining the in those days). Under local anaesthesia, subretinal subretinal fluid (SRF) only to meet with obvious space was entered after making a radial scleral failure. A combination of SRF drainage along incision near the causative break and SRF was with the idea to induce retinopexy was probably drained. Thermocautery was then introduced to introduced for the first time by Fano in 1866.1 create a retinopexy. In 1931, Gonin published his He induced chemical retinopexy in the form of series of 221 patients who underwent ignipunc- injection of iodine solution into the subretinal ture with a success rate of 63%.3 Gonin’stheory space to achieve a chemical reaction. Apart of primarily treating the break was cemented from chemical retinopexy, other modalities when his disciples namely Amslers, Weve and employed were galvanocautery, pioneered by Arruga4 reported similar success in their Deutschmann.1 operations. The second theory prevalence in this era saw a In the coming decades, various modifications role of hypotony and associated circulatory altera- of retinopexy were developed to treat the retina tions as the cause of RD. Various treatments were surrounding the causative break. The use of chem- put forward to counter the same. Injection of ical cauterization for retinopexy in the form of materials like rabbit vitreous and gelatin to potassium hydroxide after creating holes in sclera increase the intraocular pressure were attempted. (trephining) was introduced by Guist and Lindner1 Lagrange introduced a procedure known as ‘col- in 1931. Diathermy was introduced by Larsson, matage’ whereby intraocular pressure was Weve and Safar. It was used either on the bare increased by applying three rows of scleral cautery sclera (surface diathermy) or after trephining in a circumferential manner in order to increase the sclera (penetrating diathermy). Drainage of hydrostatic pressure in the retina.1 Various SRF was performed along with diathermy. This Sci J Med & Vis Res Foun July 2017 | volume XXXV | number 2 | 3 Major Review procedure was commonly employed for around of the same, scleral surgeries without tissue exci- two decades. Complications of diathermy in the sion were attempted. Weve’sreefing procedure by form of thinning and perforation led to search of placing lamellar suture bites, scleral outfolding other modalities for retinopexy. Electrolysis was and infolding techniques was some of these. reintroduced by Imre in 1932, but was seen to be The first ‘accidental’ temporary scleral indenda- less effective when compared with diathermy; tion during scleral buckle was done by Jess in hence never became popular. Although cryother- 19371 where a cotton swab was used for the apy was introduced by Deutschmann and Bietti, purpose to counteract hypotony secondary to SRF the credit for its current use goes to Harvey drainage. The first scleral buckling procedure Lincoff and Amoils who made its use easy by cre- using an episcleral exoplant was performed by ating a specially designed cryo-probe with use of Ernst Custodis in 1949.1 He used a material made liquid nitrogen. The use of light for retinopexy of polyviol and postulated a non-drainage surgery was also being studied with the first human use and advised reoperation if SRF failed to clear in 4 by Moran-Sales, although their results were pub- days. Charles Schepens5 gets the credit for doing lished after Meyer Schwickerath. Dr Schwickerath the first scleral buckling surgery in the USA in initially used sunlight, then carbon arc and finally 1951. He popularized segmental and encircling krypton for retinopexy. Ruby laser and then argon bands made of polyethylene tubes and used the laser became available with first report of its use same after making lamellar scleral flaps. in 1969 by L’Esperance. Complications secondary to polyethylene tubes led Schepens to introduce the silicone rubber implants Evolution of the indirect ophthalmoscope1 in 1960. It was Brockhurst in 1965 who intro- The introduction of ophthalmoscope by Helmontz duced the scleral buckle procedure done world- in 1850 was the stepping stone to the current wide for decades. His technique included lamellar indirect ophthalmoscope of the modern era. Ruete scleral dissection, diathermy to the scleral bed fol- was the first to introduce indirect viewing of lowed by implant placement. The first use of non- retina with his monocular indirect ophthalmo- absorbable sutures for scleral buckling was scope. The first binocular indirect ophthalmoscope devised by Arruga in 1958. was devised by Giraud Teulon, which was a hand- It was Harvey Lincoff in 1965 who modified held model developed in the nineteenth century. the original procedure by Custodis.1 The changes Charles Schepens devised the first clinical head included use of silicone sponge, use of improved mounted an indirect ophthalmoscope in 1947. scleral needles and use of cryotherapy instead of Four years later, a modified version was intro- diathermy for retinopexy. Silicone sponges were duced by Schepens who incorporated the light used in a radial or circumferential fashion depend- source and viewing system on the headband as we ing on the clinical scenario. know it today. He also described the use of scleral depression which historically was first described Evolution of vitrectomy and associated by Trantas in 1900, although he used his thumb- procedures nails for doing so. Ocular sustenance without vitreous was deemed Localization of retinal breaks as put forward impossible and its removal a crime. David Kashner by Gonin was tiresome and needed hours of with help of cellulose sponge and scissors per- training and patience. Various methods were formed the first vitrectomy (open sky) in a child described for localization of breaks, most of with trauma on 28 July 19616 and proved how an which relied on major anatomical landmarks and eye could survive without vitreous. Subsequently, their distances from the break. Amsler and he operated two cases with vitreous amylodosis in Dubois were first to devise a fundus chart for 1967–1968 which cemented his theory. His pupil, mapping extent of RD and its causative break in Robert Machemer, performed the first pars plana 1928. A combination of ophthalmoscopy and vitrectomy in a patient of vitreous haemorrhage perimetry was also used for the same first on 20 April 1970. He performed the same with describedbyLindner. help of VISC (vitrectomy, infusion, suction and cutter) developed by Jean Marie Parel. It was Evolution of scleral buckling Connor O’ Malley and Ralph Heinz7 who intro- Shortening of globe by scleral resection was the duced a divided 20-G vitrectomy system called first step towards scleral buckling although the Ocutome 800 working on principle of pneumatic initial idea was globe shortening and not support- cutting. Gholam Peyman introduced the electric ing the break.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Welch, Robert B., MD
    The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Oral History of Robert B. Welch, MD Baltimore MD, July 29, 2008 Robert B. Welch, MD recorded this interview with Dr. Allan D. Jensen on July 29, 2008. Production of the Academy Archives Committee Page 1 The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Oral History of Robert B. Welch, MD Interviewed by Allan Jensen, MD, July 29, 2008 Created for the Academy Archives of the Museum of Vision DR. ALLAN JENSEN: Hello, this is Allan Jensen. This is July 29th, 2008. We’re talking with Dr. Robert Welch for the oral histories of the Academy of Ophthalmology. The interview is taking place in my house. We are creating this for the archives of the Museum of Vision. Bob, you have a long and distinguished career in ophthalmology in patient care, teaching, and research. Tell us briefly about your training and professional positions. DR. ROBERT WELCH: Well, I guess, Allan, I’d have to start off in medical school because that’s when I first got an introduction to ophthalmology. Interestingly enough, I was really interested in medical school in going into internal medicine. But I liked ophthalmology, and, of course, with the background of my dad being an ophthalmologist, I had been exposed to it all my life. So I was naturally interested in it, and I enjoyed the rotation. Dr. Woods was a very dynamic lecturer and I can even, to this day, remember exactly where I sat in the lecture room listening to him.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles Schepens' Legacy Inspires Monte J
    eyeWitness NEWS FROM THE HARV ARD MEDICAL SCHOOL DEPARTMENT OF OPHTHALMOLOGY INSIDE: JUNE 2016 #31 1 On the Cover Leaders in Ophthalmology 2 Notes from the Chair The Gift of Experience 3 In the Spotlight Unique Pediatric Partnership Brings World-Class Care to Patients 4 2016 Faculty Retreat 6 Updates in Education - Joan W. Miller Lectureship - Medical Student Education 7 Philanthropy - Wallace Chair in Retina - Alumni Giving Society Leaders in Ophthalmology Reflect on - 2016 Pei-Fei Lee Lecture - The Howe Library TheirHMS Ophthalmology Education 11 Eyes on Research - Understanding of Fuchs’ n HMS Ophthalmology education is defined by excellence in three mission areas: - Stem Cell Therapy A clinical care, research, and education. Trainees not only graduate with exceptional - Cataract Surgery Outcomes clinical and surgical skill sets, but also with research and teaching experience and the 14 In Review: 2016 ARVO professional skills needed to compete in today’s global workforce. This world class Annual Meeting education enables graduates to excel in their chosen careers – whether in academic medicine, industry, consulting, or private practice. To illustrate the value of an HMS 16 News from All Over - Upcoming Events Ophthalmology education, we spoke with four alumni who are leaders in the field to find - Awards, Grants, and Honors out how their training shaped their careers. - Personnel Updates - Alumni Corner - In Memoriam 27% percent of current Ophthalmology department chairs in the United States and Canada are HMS Ophthalmology alumni Donald J. D’Amico, MD, is an internationally recognized frontrunner in the field of vitreoretinal surgery. As the John Milton McLean Professor and Chairman of Ophthalmology at Weill Cornell Medical College and Ophthalmologist-in-Chief at New York-Presbyterian Hospital, he is one of 35 HMS Ophthalmology alumni who chair an academic Ophthalmol- FIND US ONLINE! ogy department.
    [Show full text]
  • IN HISTORY a Compilation of Articles on Instruments, Books and Individuals That Shaped the Course of Ophthalmology
    THE EYE IN HISTORY A compilation of articles on Instruments, Books and Individuals that shaped the course of Ophthalmology Mr. Richard KEELER FRCOphth (Honorary) Professor Harminder S DUA Chair and Professor of Ophthalmology, University of Nottingham MBBS, DO, DO (London), MS, MNAMS, FRCS (Edinburgh), FEBO, FRCOphth, FRCP (Honorary, Edinburgh), FCOptom. (Honorary), FRCOphth. (Honorary), MD, PhD. 4 EDITION Edited by: Laboratoires Théa 12 Rue Louis Blériot - ZI du Brézet 63017 Clermont-Ferrand cedex 2 - France Tel. +33 (0)4 73 98 14 36 - Fax +33 (0)4 73 98 14 38 www.laboratoires-thea.com The content of the book presents the viewpoint of the authors and does not necessarily reflect the opinions of Laboratoires Théa. Mr. Richard KEELER and Prof. Harminder S DUA have no financial interest in this book. All rights of translation, adaptation and reproduction by any means are reserved for all countries. Any reproduction, in whole or part, by any means whatsoever, of the pages published in this book, is prohibited and unlawful and constitutes forgery without the prior written consent of the publisher. The only reproductions allowed are, on the one hand, those strictly reserved for private use and not intended for collective use and, on the other hand, short analyses and quotations justified by the scientific or informational nature of the work into which they are incorporated. (Law of 11 March 1957, art. 40 and 41, and Penal Code art. 425) 5 6 PREFACE For seven years (2007-2014) Dr. Arun D Singh and I served as editors-in-chief of the British Journal of Ophthalmology (BJO), published by the BMJ publishing group.
    [Show full text]
  • 1815, WW1 and WW2
    Episode 2 : 1815, WW1 and WW2 ‘The Cockpit of Europe’ is how Belgium has understatement is an inalienable national often been described - the stage upon which characteristic, and fame is by no means a other competing nations have come to fight reliable measure of bravery. out their differences. A crossroads and Here we look at more than 50 such heroes trading hub falling between power blocks, from Brussels and Wallonia, where the Battle Belgium has been the scene of countless of Waterloo took place, and the scene of colossal clashes - Ramillies, Oudenarde, some of the most bitter fighting in the two Jemappes, Waterloo, Ypres, to name but a World Wars - and of some of Belgium’s most few. Ruled successively by the Romans, heroic acts of resistance. Franks, French, Holy Roman Empire, Burgundians, Spanish, Austrians and Dutch, Waterloo, 1815 the idea of an independent Belgium nation only floated into view in the 18th century. The concept of an independent Belgian nation, in the shape that we know it today, It is easy to forget that Belgian people have had little meaning until the 18th century. been living in these lands all the while. The However, the high-handed rule of the Austrian name goes back at least 2,000 years, when Empire provoked a rebellion called the the Belgae people inspired the name of the Brabant Revolution in 1789–90, in which Roman province Gallia Belgica. Julius Caesar independence was proclaimed. It was brutally was in no doubt about their bravery: ‘Of all crushed, and quickly overtaken by events in these people [the Gauls],’ he wrote, ‘the the wake of the French Revolution of 1789.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage
    The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Conversation Between Harvey Lincoff, MD and Ingrid Kreissig, MD Orlando FL, October 22, 2011 Drs. Harvey Lincoff and Ingrid Kreissig recorded this conversation on October 22, 2011 during the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, in Orlando, FL. Drs. Lincoff and Kreissig are retina specialists and collaborators for more than 40 years. Dr. Lincoff lives in New York and Dr. Kreissig in Germany. You are invited now to listen to their conversation and read the transcript below. In this excerpt, Drs. Lincoff and Kreissig describe their first meeting in 1969. Here Dr. Lincoff begins by describing his first work on cryosurgical adhesions and Dr. Kreissig relates using an electron microscope to study the ultrastructure of a light, medium and heavy cryosurgical lesion resulting in different adhesive strengths. Drs. Lincoff and Kreissig conclude with their insights into minimal retinal surgery. Click here to listen to the complete audio of their conversation (54 MB) The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Conversation Between Harvey Lincoff, MD and Ingrid Kreissig, MD Orlando FL, October 22, 2011 HARVEY LINCOFF: This is Professor Ingrid Kreissig from Germany and I’m Harvey Lincoff from New York. And we’re both eye doctors, both retinal surgeons. Ingrid, would you share a little of your family history and any connections that it had to medicine and ophthalmology. INGRID KREISSIG: Actually, there is no family history, neither in medicine nor ophthalmology. As a child, perhaps influenced by my governess, Else Zenz, who was formerly a nurse, I got interested in medicine and I was always determined to become a doctor.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles L. Schepens–The Power of His Life
    Graefe’s Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol (2006) 244:771–772 DOI 10.1007/s00417-006-0373-8 OBITUARY Charles L. Schepens–The Power of His Life Jerry Sebag Published online: 24 June 2006 # Springer-Verlag to honor his 94 years of life, for a great man’s death is made significant by the power of his life. Indeed, the impact of Charles Schepens’ being comes into focus at his passing, causing each of us to marvel at the history he created. By dint of the way he lived, Charles Schepens epitomized an important period in the history of Ophthalmology, Medi- cine, and the world. His story serves as an inspiration to us all. Born in 1912, in Mouscron, Belgium, Charles Luc Schepens was the youngest of six children. His father was a general practitioner who died when Charles Schepens was only 7. Like three of his elder brothers, Schepens became a physician. A mathematician in college, he was drawn to Ophthalmology. His first great contribution, resulting perhaps from his early penchant for mathematics, was the creation of the binocular indirect ophthalmoscope. Now used routinely throughout the world, this instrument revolutionized fundus examination and enabled the devel- opment of modern retinal surgery. As a teacher of teachers, Schepens eventually taught indirect ophthalmoscopy and Charles L. Schepens modern retinal surgery to everyone in the world. Indeed, in – (1912 2006) France, the indirect ophthalmoscope is referred to by many Lives of great men remind us, as “Le Schepens”. We can make our lives sublime, The markedly improved success rates in retinal reattach- And departing leave behind us, ment that were realized as a result of “Le Schepens” and a Footprints in the sands of time series of other developments in Boston for retinal detach- (Psalm of Life; HW Longfellow) ment surgery, reaffirmed Schepens’ belief that better therapies can only be attained through improved basic On June 24, 2006 a service was held at the Memorial science understanding of disease processes and correspond- Church of Harvard University in Cambridge, Massachusetts ingly enhanced diagnostics.
    [Show full text]
  • Charles L. Schepens Charles L
    Charles L. Schepens Charles L. Schepens, long considered one of the giants of 20th Century ophthalmology and the unquestioned leader in retinal detachment surgery, died March 28th, 2006 at the age of 94 in Boston, MA. Born March 13, 1912, just before World War I, to a much-admired general practitioner and the daughter of a burgemeister, the medical profession and war would impact Charles throughout his life. Mouscron, Belgium, his birthplace, was just 30 kilometers behind the German front. Charles was the youngest of six children. His three brothers all became physicians and his sisters, nurses. Though the family suffered during the war, their mother managed to care for them and Charles enjoyed accompanying his father on Sunday house calls in a horse-drawn carriage. By the time Charles was thirteen both his parents had died and he was sent off to the Jesuit boarding school in the city of Namur, a most happy time according to his later recollections. He was drawn to sports and the outdoors, and daily exercise remained part of his life to the end. At fifteen he met Oleg Pomerantzeff, a classmate who became his closest friend. This enduring friendship grew into a collegial association when, four decades later, Oleg joined Charles’s medical research team in Boston. Charles Schepens first obtained a certificate in mathematics at the University of Ghent. He would have used this to enter the engineering school, his preference, but bowing to peer pressure and family tradition, he entered the medical school. He earned his medical degree in 1936 and received surgery training at the City Hospital of Ghent.
    [Show full text]
  • Dictionnaire L-Z.Qxd
    La Chambre, Marin Cureau de (1594-1669) French physician. La Chambre was born at Le Mans, France, and became physician to Louis XIII and advisor to Louis XIV, who valued him for his supposed ability to assess the character and abilities of a person on the basis of physiognomy alone. La Chambre, one of the first members of the Académie Francaise (1635) and of the Académie de Sciences (1666), wrote on a wide variety of medical and non-medical topics, especially psychology; his best-known work is Les caractères des passions (1658-1663). He wrote also : La lumière Paris 1657 and Nouvelles observations et conjectures sur l'iris. Paris 1662. JPW La Charrière, Joseph de (? -1690) French surgeon of Annecy, France. He practiced surgery in his native city after some years of training in Paris. His treatises on anatomy L and surgery are compilations containing little that is original; the surgical work, however, enjoyed considerable popularity, going through many editions and translations.He wrote: Nouvelles opérations de chirurgie Paris: D. Horthemels, 1692 and Anatomie nouvelle de la tête de l'homme, et de ses dépendances Paris 1703. JPW La Harpe, Jean Jacques Charles de (1802-1877) French physician who wrote De tubuli metallici immissione in cura obstructionis ductus nasalis. Göttingen 1827. JPW La Hire, Gabriel Philippe (1677-1719) French physician, son of Philippe de La Hire. Little is known about him. In ophthalmology he wrote Remarques sur la cataracte et la glaucoma in : Mémoires de l’Académie royale des sciences pour l’année 1707, 553-555, Paris 1709. JPW La Hire, Philippe de (1640-1718) French mathematician, physicist, and astronomer of Paris, whose research and writings encompassed a diversity of theoretical and applied scientific subjects.
    [Show full text]
  • Richard K. Forster, MD: a Life Through the Lens of an Ophthalmologist
    The Newsletter of the Senior Ophthalmologist Spring 2020 | Volume 24 | Issue 2 SCOPE Richard K. Forster, MD: A Life Through which furthered his interest in bird anatomy. Although he did some the Lens of an Ophthalmologist hunting, trapping and fishing in his and Nature Photographer youth, he decided at the age of 11 to restrict his enjoyment of the out- By M. Bruce Shields, MD doors to observing his surround- ings and wildlife and participating s ophthalmologists, we in the woods and fields of his fam- in environmental conservation. have spent much of our ily’s 68 acres, enjoying the wildlife Acareers looking through that included a variety of birds: This early decision to admire and lenses in the office and the operat- chickadees, nuthatches, blue jays, preserve the wonders of nature, he ing room. And I suspect we have crows and occasional pheasants. In reflects, may have had something all shared the sense of awe as we 1949, he won a trip to the Eastern to do with his choice of medicine beheld the exquisite beauty and Poultry Judging contest in Boston, as a career. After graduating from intricacy of the human eye. Dartmouth College, he earned his medical degree at Boston University The thousands of examinations School of Medicine and, follow- that each of us have performed ing an internship at Boston City over the years have not only Hospital, joined the U.S. Public given us a respect for the Health Service and was fortu- elegance of nature, but itously assigned to Miami for has sharpened our two years.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Conversation Between Paul
    The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Conversation Between Paul Lichter, MD and William Tasman, MD In Partnership with StoryCorps, San Francisco CA, October 24, 2009 Drs. Paul Lichter and William Tasman recorded this conversation on October 24, 2009 during the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, in San Francisco CA. Dr. Lichter is a glaucoma specialist from Michigan and Dr. Tasman is a retina specialist living in Pennsylvania. You are invited now to listen to excerpts and read the complete transcript below. Here Dr. Lichter describes his first glaucoma patient. In this excerpt Dr. Tasman describes his time working with Gerd Meyer-Schwickerath, MD and photo coagulation. The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Conversation Between Paul Lichter, MD and William Tasman, MD In Partnership with StoryCorps, San Francisco CA, October 24, 2009 DR. PAUL LICHTER: I’m Paul Lichter. I’m 70 years old. It’s October 24th, 2009. We’re in San Francisco, California, and I’m talking to Bill Tasman, who has been a long-time friend and colleague and fellow department chair for many, many years, and fellow officer of the American Academy of Ophthalmology in the past, and we’re here to have a conversation. DR. BILL TASMAN: I’m Bill Tasman. I wish I was a kid like Dr. Lichter. I’m 80. Today’s date is October 24th, 2009. We’re in San Francisco, and my relationship with Dr. Lichter is friend and colleague. As he just said, we have served together on the American Academy of Ophthalmology Board, the American Board of Ophthalmology and the AOS.
    [Show full text]
  • The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage
    The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Conversation Between Alvaro Rodriguez, MD and Juan Verdaguer, MD Chicago IL, November 11, 2012 Drs. Alvaro Rodriguez and Juan Verdaguer recorded this conversation on November 11, 2012 during the Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Ophthalmology, in Chicago, IL. In this excerpt Dr. Rodriguez describes how his work with Charles Schepens, MD ended and he began his career in Columbia. (.mp3 file) Here, Dr. Verdaguer discusses his current work with the Fundación Oftalmológica Los Andes and the availablilty of training for South Americans. (.mp3 file) Co‐Production of the Academy Archives and Senior Ophthalmologists Committees Page 1 The Foundation of the American Academy of Ophthalmology Museum of Vision & Ophthalmic Heritage Conversation Between Alvaro Rodriguez, MD and Juan Verdaguer, MD Chicago IL, November 11, 2012 JUAN VERDAGUER: My name is Juan Verdaguer. I am an ophthalmologist from Chile, a Professor of Ophthalmology and Academic Director, Fundación Otftalmológica Los Andes. I am a very good friend of Alvaro Rodriguez, who is from Colombia. ALVARO RODRIGUEZ: I am Alvaro Rodríguez from Bogotá, Colombia, born there, and I am the founder of the Fundación Oftalmológica Nacional in Bogotá and good friend of Juan Verdaguer for many years. JUAN: Well, Alvaro, tell me something about your family. ALVARO: Well, my family is Colombian, on both my fathers’ and mothers’ side and we’re a family of nine children. Two died very early and seven remained for education. So it was a hard time for my parents, mostly because of the political situation at home after the 1930 world economic crisis.
    [Show full text]
  • Sebag CV 7-14
    CURRICULUM VITAE NAME: Jerry Sebag DATE OF BIRTH: June 8, 1951 PLACE OF BIRTH: Tiberias, Israel NATIONALITY: American EDUCATION: 1965-69 Bronx High School of Science, New York 1969-73 B.A. Columbia College, in the City of New York 1975-79 M.D. College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York POST-DOCTORAL TRAINING: Internship: 1979-80 Cedars-Sinai/UCLA, Los Angeles, CA; Internal Medicine Residency: 1980-83 Clinical Fellow of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School Resident, Mass Eye & Ear Infirmary, Boston, Mass. Fellowship: 1984-86 Clinical Fellow of Ophthalmology, Harvard Medical School Vitreo-Retinal Fellow, Retina Associates & Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation Boston, Mass. LICENSURE & CERTIFICATION: 1980 Diplomate, National Board of Medical Examiners 1980 California License # G42362 1983 New York License # 154195 1984 Massachusetts License # 52107 1985 Diplomate, American Board of Ophthalmology 1986 Fellow, American Academy of Ophthalmology 1988 Fellow, Royal College of Ophthalmologists (U.K.) 1990 Florida License # ME 0058851 1991 Fellow, American College of Surgeons RESEARCH FELLOWSHIPS & ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS: 1972 Columbia College Research Fellowship, Columbia University, New York, N.Y. 1973 Research Associate, Dept. Pathology, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, N.Y. 1973-75 Thord-Gray Research Fellow of the American-Scandinavian Foundation Dept. Medicine, Karolinska Sjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden 1976 Immunology Research Fellowship, Univ. N. M. School of Medicine, Albuquerque, New Mexico 1978-79 Research Associate, Edward S. Harkness Eye Research Institute, College of Physicians & Surgeons, Columbia University, N.Y. 1982-83 Research Associate, Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation, Boston, Mass. 1983-84 Guggenheim Fellow, The John Simon Guggenheim Memorial Foundation, National Institute of Health & Medical Research (I.N.S.E.R.M.), Paris, France 1987-90 Adjunct Clinical Assistant Scientist, Eye Research Institute of Retina Foundation, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
    [Show full text]