DOCSLIB.ORG

Adhesion and the Surface Energy Components of Natural

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Adhesion and the Surface Energy Components of Natural ADHESION AND THE SURFACE ENERGY COMPONENTS OF NATURAL MINERALS AND AGGREGATES A Thesis by CLINT MATTHEW MILLER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE August 2010 Major Subject: Geology ADHESION AND THE SURFACE ENERGY COMPONENTS OF NATURAL MINERALS AND AGGREGATES A Thesis by CLINT MATTHEW MILLER Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE Approved by: Chair of Committee, Bruce Herbert Committee Members, Dallas Little Terry L. Wade Hongbin Zhan Head of Department, Andreas Kronenberg August 2010 Major Subject: Geology iii ABSTRACT Adhesion and the Surface Energy Components of Natural Minerals and Aggregates. (August 2010) Clint Matthew Miller, B.S., Texas A&M University Chair of Advisory Committee: Dr. Bruce Herbert A range of geochemical reactions are controlled by the interfacial characteristics of rocks and minerals. Many engineered and natural systems are affected by geochemical reactions that occur at interfaces. Asphalt-aggregate adhesion in road construction is influenced by the interfacial characteristics of the aggregate. Likewise, the remediation of nonaqueous-phase liquid contaminants, such as trichloroethylene or methyl tert-butyl ether, is controlled by the interactions between mineral surfaces and the organic liquid. Many natural systems are also influenced by reactions at interfaces. The migration of petroleum in sedimentary basins is influenced by the wettability of the surfaces of the basin pore space. Adhesion of organisms, such as bacteria or lichens, to rock surfaces is controlled by the interactions of proteins and mineral surfaces. Rock and mineral surfaces are described by surface energy. Surface energy is a thermodynamic construct defined as the amount of work required to form more of a surface. Surface energy can be divided into van der Waals, Lewis acid, and Lewis base components. The ability to predict the magnitude of surface energy components is valuable in understanding species behavior. Surface energy is controlled by three master variables: surface chemistry, surface morphology, and surface coatings. While the surface energy of a number of minerals and aggregates has been characterized, there has not yet been a comprehensive study of the surface energies of a variety of the most common minerals and aggregates using consistent methodology. In addition there has iv not yet been a study of the effect of these three master variables on surface energies of natural minerals and rocks. This study measured the surface energy of 22 common minerals and 7 aggregates. The samples’ bulk and surface chemistries were characterized with wavelength and energy dispersive spectra analyses on an electron microprobe and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. The XPS was also used to quantify the organic and inorganic coatings on the surfaces. Results showed that van der Waals surface energy is typically between 40 and 60 ergs/cm2. Polar surface energy varies by 1 to 3 orders of magnitude, and thus is likely the most important component in accounting for changes between natural minerals. v DEDICATION I would like to dedicate this thesis to my parents for giving me an education and for paying for another one at Texas A&M; my grandparents for their love and support (We miss you Granddad), and my beautiful fiancé Jane Ellen. I love you. vi ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS I would like to thank my committee chair, Dr. Herbert, and my committee members, Dr. Little, Dr. Wade, and Dr. Zhan, for their guidance and support throughout the course of this research. Additionally, I would like to thank Dr. Guillemette for hours and hours of high quality work and help on the electron microprobe and mineral chemistry questions. Thanks also go to Dr. Bhasin for training on the universal sorption device, Dr. Kuo for help with the elemental analysis, Dr. Liang for training on the x-ray photoelectron spectroscopic analyses, and Nathan Gardener for his help with the universal sorption device and all of the headaches therein. Only Nathan and I truly know what that sentence means. vii TABLE OF CONTENTS Page ABSTRACT………………………………………………………………………… iii DEDICATION……………………………………………………………………… v ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS………………………………………………………… vi TABLE OF CONTENTS…………………………………………………………… vii LIST OF FIGURES………………………………………………………………… ix LIST OF TABLES …………………………………………………………………. xi CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION: SURFACE ENERGY OF NATURAL MINERALS.. 1 Geologic and Engineering Processes Impacted by Organic-Rock Interactions ……..…………………………………………….……… 1 Surface Energy of Solids ……………………………………….……. 3 The Components of Surface Energy ………………………….……… 5 van der Waals ………………………………………….………. 5 Lewis Acid/Base ………………………………………..……… 6 Aggregate Surfaces and Factors That Control Surface Energy ……… 7 Nonpolar Active Sites on Surfaces …………………………….. 7 Polar Actives Sites on Surfaces………………………………… 8 Physical Characteristics………………………………………… 9 Organic and Inorganic Coatings ……………………………….. 10 Measurement of Surface Energy ……………………………..……… 11 History of Surface Energy……………………………………… 11 Surface Energy Measurement Methodology ……….………….. 12 Research Objectives ………………………………………………….. 14 Present Status of Surface Energy Research …………………………. 15 Materials and Methods …………………………………………. 15 Data Analysis and Error Analysis ……………………………………. 22 II CONCLUSIONS ON MEASURING THE SURFACE ENERGY OF A VARIETY OF THE MOST COMMON MINERALS…………………… 24 Introduction …………………………………………………….…… 24 Materials and Methods ……………………………………………….. 28 Pretreatment ……………………………………………………. 28 Chemical Characterization …………………………………….. 29 viii Page Universal Sorption Device ……………………………………... 37 Quality Assurance/Quality Control ………………………………….. 40 Grain Sizes……………………………………………………… 40 Specific Surface Area ………………………………………….. 41 Bulk Moisture and Elemental Analysis………………………… 42 Data Analysis and Error Analysis ……………………………… 50 Results and Discussion ………………………………………………. 51 Surface Area and Surface Roughness ………………………….. 53 Surface Energy Results … ……………………………………. 64 Conclusions ………………………………………………………….. 89 REFERENCES …………………………………………………………………….. 94 APPENDIX A BULK AND SURFACE CHEMISTRY RESULTS …………….. 107 APPENDIX B SURFACE ENERGY RESULTS ………………………………… 141 APPENDIX C MINERAL ROUGHNESS RESULTS …………………………… 169 APPENDIX D RHODOCHROSITE X-RAY IMAGES ………………………….. 177 APPENDIX E XPS PEAK RESULTS ……………………………………………. 183 VITA ……………………………………………………………………………….. 207 ix LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1-1 Relationship of Surface Energy to Work …………………………... 4 Figure 1-2 Low and High Energy Solid Contact Angles ………………………. 13 Figure 2-1 Rubotherm Column Assembly …………………………………….. 38 Figure 2-2 Universal Sorption Device …………………………………………. 40 Figure 2-3 Fragment Size Analysis ……………………………………………. 44 Figure 2-4 Mineral Moisture Percent ………………………………………….. 49 Figure 2-5 Relationship between Surface Roughness and Surface Area ……… 60 Figure 2-6 Surface Roughness Results ………………………………………… 63 Figure 2-7 van der Waals Surface Energy (All)………………………………... 65 Figure 2-8 van der Waals Surface Energy (Carbonates) ………………………. 66 Figure 2-9 van der Waals Surface Energy (Common Silicates) ………………. 66 Figure 2-10 Lewis Acid Surface Energy (All) ………………………………….. 71 Figure 2-11 Lewis Acid Surface Energy (Carbonates) …………………………. 72 Figure 2-12 Lewis Acid Surface Energy (Sulfates) ……………………………... 73 Figure 2-13 Lewis Acid Surface Energy (Common Silicates) ………………….. 74 Figure 2-14 Lewis Acid Surface Energy (Clay Minerals) ………………………. 75 Figure 2-15 Lewis Base Surface Energy (All)…………………………………… 78 Figure 2-16 Lewis Base Surface Energy (Carbonates) …………………………. 79 Figure 2-17 Effect of Heat on Gypsum Lewis Base Surface Energy …………… 80 Figure 2-18 Total Polar Surface Energy (All) ………………………………….. 83 Figure 2-19 Total Surface Energy……………………………………………….. 84 Figure 2-20 Total Component Surface Energy ………………………………….. 85 Figure 2-21 van der Waals Surface Energy per Gram ………………………….. 86 Figure 2-22 Polar Surface Energy per Gram ……………………………………. 87 Figure 2-23 Total Surface Energy per Gram ……………………………………. 88 x Page Figure 2-24 Effect of Organic Coatings on Carbonate Surface Energy ………… 91 Figure 2-25 Effect of Organic Coatings on Lewis Base Surface Energy ………. 92 xi LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1-1 Preliminary Mineral Selection……………………………………… 16 Table 1-2 Preliminary Aggregate Selection …………………………………... 19 Table 2-1 Surface Energy Literature Values for Reference Vapors ………….. 29 Table 2-2 Final Selection of Minerals ………………………………………… 30 Table 2-3 Relative Sensitivity Factors for XPS……………………………….. 34 Table 2-4 XPS Peak Positions (eV) by Mineral ………………………………. 35 Table 2-5 Atomic Species Tested on XPS ……………………………………. 36 Table 2-6 Grain Size Analysis………………………………………………… 43 Table 2-7 Sulphanilic Acid Calibration for Elemental Analysis ……………… 45 Table 2-8 Elemental Analysis Results………………………………………… 46 Table 2-9 Moisture Analysis Prior to Heating ……………………………….. 48 Table 2-10 Mineral Surface Functional Groups………………………………… 54 Table 2-11 Bulk and Surface Measured Chemical Formulas ………………….. 56 Table 2-12 Measured Specific Surface Areas ………………………………….. 58 Table 2-13 Specific Surface Area Literature Value Comparison ……………… 59 Table 2-14 Measured Values of Surface Roughness …………………………... 62 Table 2-15 van der Waals Surface Energy Summary ………………………….. 67 Table 2-16 Lewis Acid Surface Energy Summary …………………………….. 70 Table 2-17 Lewis Base Surface Energy Summary …………………………….. 76 Table 2-18 Polar Surface Energy Summary ……………………………………. 81 1 CHAPTER
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Glossary Physics (I-Introduction)
    1 Glossary Physics (I-introduction) - Efficiency: The percent of the work put into a machine that is converted into useful work output; = work done / energy used [-]. = eta In machines: The work output of any machine cannot exceed the work input (<=100%); in an ideal machine, where no energy is transformed into heat: work(input) = work(output), =100%. Energy: The property of a system that enables it to do work. Conservation o. E.: Energy cannot be created or destroyed; it may be transformed from one form into another, but the total amount of energy never changes. Equilibrium: The state of an object when not acted upon by a net force or net torque; an object in equilibrium may be at rest or moving at uniform velocity - not accelerating. Mechanical E.: The state of an object or system of objects for which any impressed forces cancels to zero and no acceleration occurs. Dynamic E.: Object is moving without experiencing acceleration. Static E.: Object is at rest.F Force: The influence that can cause an object to be accelerated or retarded; is always in the direction of the net force, hence a vector quantity; the four elementary forces are: Electromagnetic F.: Is an attraction or repulsion G, gravit. const.6.672E-11[Nm2/kg2] between electric charges: d, distance [m] 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (q1q2/d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] m,M, mass [kg] Gravitational F.: Is a mutual attraction between all masses: q, charge [As] [C] 2 2 2 2 F = GmM/d [Nm /kg kg 1/m ] = [N] 0, dielectric constant Strong F.: (nuclear force) Acts within the nuclei of atoms: 8.854E-12 [C2/Nm2] [F/m] 2 2 2 2 2 F = 1/(40) (e /d ) [(CC/m )(Nm /C )] = [N] , 3.14 [-] Weak F.: Manifests itself in special reactions among elementary e, 1.60210 E-19 [As] [C] particles, such as the reaction that occur in radioactive decay.
    [Show full text]
  • Physical Model for Vaporization
    Physical model for vaporization Jozsef Garai Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Florida International University, University Park, VH 183, Miami, FL 33199 Abstract Based on two assumptions, the surface layer is flexible, and the internal energy of the latent heat of vaporization is completely utilized by the atoms for overcoming on the surface resistance of the liquid, the enthalpy of vaporization was calculated for 45 elements. The theoretical values were tested against experiments with positive result. 1. Introduction The enthalpy of vaporization is an extremely important physical process with many applications to physics, chemistry, and biology. Thermodynamic defines the enthalpy of vaporization ()∆ v H as the energy that has to be supplied to the system in order to complete the liquid-vapor phase transformation. The energy is absorbed at constant pressure and temperature. The absorbed energy not only increases the internal energy of the system (U) but also used for the external work of the expansion (w). The enthalpy of vaporization is then ∆ v H = ∆ v U + ∆ v w (1) The work of the expansion at vaporization is ∆ vw = P ()VV − VL (2) where p is the pressure, VV is the volume of the vapor, and VL is the volume of the liquid. Several empirical and semi-empirical relationships are known for calculating the enthalpy of vaporization [1-16]. Even though there is no consensus on the exact physics, there is a general agreement that the surface energy must be an important part of the enthalpy of vaporization. The vaporization diminishes the surface energy of the liquid; thus this energy must be supplied to the system.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydrogen Bond Assisted Adhesion in Portland Cement-Based Materials
    136 Cerâmica 57 (2011) 136-139 Hydrogen bond assisted adhesion in Portland cement-based materials (Adesão assistida por ligação de hidrogênio em materiais à base de cimento Portland) H. L. Rossetto1,2, V. C. Pandolfelli1 1Departamento de Engenharia de Materiais - DEMa, Universidade Federal de S. Carlos - UFSCar, Rod. Washington Luiz, km 235, S. Carlos, SP 13565-590 2Instituto de Física de S. Carlos, Universidade de S. Paulo - IFSC-USP, Av. Trabalhador São-Carlense 400, S. Carlos, SP 13566-590 [email protected] Abstract Adhesion is a physical-chemical parameter able to render innovations to Portland cement-based materials. However, this concept still lacks experimental evidence to underlie further developments in this subject. This work has demonstrated how distinct substances can impart different adhesion forces after evaluating the hydration degree and the mechanical strength of non-reactive cementitious materials. The substances capable of making tridimensional hydrogen bonds, such as water, for instance, were the most effective in providing cementitious samples with improved bending strength. It implies that water is not only important because of its role in cement hydration, but also because it develops adhesion between hydrated cementitious surfaces. More than speculating the fundamental understanding on adhesion in Portland cement-based materials, the present paper intends to stimulate thinking on how to take the benefits of the water confined between the hydrated cementitious surfaces as an in-built nanoadhesive, so far little explored, but at the same time so prone to yield high performance materials. Keywords: adhesion, hydrogen bond, mechanical properties, Portland cement. Resumo Adesão é um parâmetro físico-químico que pode promover inovações em materiais à base de cimento Portland.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Kinetic Studies Of
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, IRVINE Kinetic Studies of Multivalent Nanoparticle Adhesion DISSERTATION submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the deGree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY in Biomedical EnGineerinG by MinGqiu WanG Dissertation Committee: Assistant Professor Jered Haun, Chair Associate Professor Jun Allard Professor YounG Jik Kwon 2018 © 2018 MinGqiu WanG DEDICATION To my parents, for their unconditional love and support. ii TABLE OF CONTENTS DEDICATION.......................................................................................................................... II TABLE OF CONTENTS........................................................................................................ III LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................................. V LIST OF TABLES ................................................................................................................. VII ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ..................................................................................................... VIII CURRICULUM VITAE ........................................................................................................... X ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION ............................................................................... XI 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................... 1 1.1. TARGET NANOPARTICLE ADHESION ............................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Van Der Waals Force & Hydrophobic Effect
    International Journal of Advanced Computer Technology (IJACT) ISSN:2319-7900 Van der Waals Force & Hydrophobic Effect Park, Ho-Min, Grade 12, Ewell Castle School , UK. [Abstract] polar atoms interacting with each other, Deybe Force Van der Waals forces are electrostatic forces. They Effect which caused between a molecule with is polar, operate not only between polar molecules but also and one that is not, and London Dispersal Effect that acts between electrically neutral atoms and molecules. This is between two non-polar molecules/atoms[3]. Because the because the movement of electrons in the outer shell of electrons around each molecule/atom repel each other, it the atoms temporarily leads to charge displacements – creates a redistribution of charge, inducing an and to so-called polarization. Charged areas with instantaneous dipole moment[3]. Dispersion forces are different signs are then attracted to one another – and caused by fluctuations in the electron distribution within therefore ensure an attraction between two atoms, even if molecules or atoms. Since all atoms and molecules have these are electrically neutral overall. The van der Waals electrons, they all have dispersion forces. The electrons force is an electromagnetic interaction between in an atom or molecule may, at any one instant, be correlated fluctuating charges on two electrically neutral unevenly distributed[4]. The purpose of this study is to surfaces. As the surfaces approach more closely, the explore mechanisms of van der Waals forces forces and force increases as fluctuations of shorter and shorter to identify the potential on the scientific field. length scale come into play, but ultimately the force will saturate when the surfaces are so close that the even shortest wavelength charge fluctuations are included.
    [Show full text]
  • Adhesion and Cohesion
    Hindawi Publishing Corporation International Journal of Dentistry Volume 2012, Article ID 951324, 8 pages doi:10.1155/2012/951324 Review Article Adhesion and Cohesion J. Anthony von Fraunhofer School of Dentistry, University of Maryland, Baltimore, MD 21201, USA Correspondence should be addressed to J. Anthony von Fraunhofer, [email protected] Received 18 October 2011; Accepted 14 November 2011 Academic Editor: Cornelis H. Pameijer Copyright © 2012 J. Anthony von Fraunhofer. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The phenomena of adhesion and cohesion are reviewed and discussed with particular reference to dentistry. This review considers the forces involved in cohesion and adhesion together with the mechanisms of adhesion and the underlying molecular processes involved in bonding of dissimilar materials. The forces involved in surface tension, surface wetting, chemical adhesion, dispersive adhesion, diffusive adhesion, and mechanical adhesion are reviewed in detail and examples relevant to adhesive dentistry and bonding are given. Substrate surface chemistry and its influence on adhesion, together with the properties of adhesive materials, are evaluated. The underlying mechanisms involved in adhesion failure are covered. The relevance of the adhesion zone and its impor- tance with regard to adhesive dentistry and bonding to enamel and dentin is discussed. 1. Introduction molecular attraction by which the particles of a body are uni- ted throughout the mass. In other words, adhesion is any at- Every clinician has experienced the failure of a restoration, be traction process between dissimilar molecular species, which it loosening of a crown, loss of an anterior Class V restora- have been brought into direct contact such that the adhesive tion, or leakage of a composite restoration.
    [Show full text]
  • Unique Properties of Water!
    Name: _______ANSWER KEY_______________ Class: _____ Date: _______________ Unique Properties of Water! Word Bank: Adhesion Evaporation Polar Surface tension Cohesion Freezing Positive Universal solvent Condensation Melting Sublimation Dissolve Negative 1. The electrons are not shared equally between the hydrogen and oxygen atoms of water creating a Polar molecule. 2. The polarity of water allows it to dissolve most substances. Because of this it is referred to as the universal solvent 3. Water molecules stick to other water molecules. This property is called cohesion. 4. Hydrogen bonds form between adjacent water molecules because the positive charged hydrogen end of one water molecule attracts the negative charged oxygen end of another water molecule. 5. Water molecules stick to other materials due to its polar nature. This property is called adhesion. 6. Hydrogen bonds hold water molecules closely together which causes water to have high surface tension. This is why water tends to clump together to form drops rather than spread out into a thin film. 7. Condensation is when water changes from a gas to a liquid. 8. Sublimation is when water changes from a solid directly to a gas. 9. Freezing is when water changes from a liquid to a solid. 10. Melting is when water changes from a solid to a liquid. 11. Evaporation is when water changes from a liquid to a gas. 12. Why does ice float? Water expands as it freezes, so it is LESS DENSE AS A SOLID. 13. What property refers to water molecules resembling magnets? How are these alike? Polar bonds create positive and negative ends of the molecule.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Structure, Chemisorption and Reactions
    Surface Structure, Chemisorption and Reactions Eckhard Pehlke, Institut für Theoretische Physik und Astrophysik, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany. Topics: (i) interplay between the geometric and electronic structure of solid surfaces, (ii) physical properties of surfaces: surface energy, surface stress and their relevance for surface morphology (iii) adsorption and desorption energy barriers, chemical reactivity of surfaces, heterogeneous catalysis (iv) chemisorption dynamics and energy dissipation: electronically non-adiabatic processes Technological Importance of Surfaces Solid surfaces are intriguing objects for basic research, and they are also of high technological utility: substrates for homo- or hetero-epitaxial growth of semiconductor thin films used in device technology surfaces can act as heterogeneous catalysts, used to induce and steer the desired chemical reactions Sect. I: The Geometric and the Electronic Structure of Crystal Surfaces Surface Crystallography 2D 3D number of space groups: 17 230 number of point groups: 10 32 number of Bravais lattices: 5 14 2D- symbol lattice 2D Bravais space point crystal system parameters lattice group groups m mp 1 oblique (mono- γ b 2 a, b, γ 2 clin) a o op b (ortho- a, b a m rectangular rhom- o 7 γ = 90 2mm bic) oc b a t (tetra- a = b 4 o tp a 3 square gonal) γ = 90 a 4mm a h hp 3 o a hexagonal (hexa- a = b 120 6 o gonal) γ = 120 5 3m 6mm Bulk Terminated fcc Crystal Surfaces z z fcc a (010) x y c a=c/ √ 2 x square lattice (tp) z z fcc (110) a c _ [110] y x rectangular lattice (op) z _ (111) fcc [011] _ [110] a y hexagonal lattice (hp) x Surface Atomic Geometry Examples: a reduced inter-layer H/Si(111) separation normal relaxation 2a Si(111) (7x7) (2x1) reconstruction K.
    [Show full text]
  • Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2
    Multidisciplinary Design Project Engineering Dictionary Version 0.0.2 February 15, 2006 . DRAFT Cambridge-MIT Institute Multidisciplinary Design Project This Dictionary/Glossary of Engineering terms has been compiled to compliment the work developed as part of the Multi-disciplinary Design Project (MDP), which is a programme to develop teaching material and kits to aid the running of mechtronics projects in Universities and Schools. The project is being carried out with support from the Cambridge-MIT Institute undergraduate teaching programe. For more information about the project please visit the MDP website at http://www-mdp.eng.cam.ac.uk or contact Dr. Peter Long Prof. Alex Slocum Cambridge University Engineering Department Massachusetts Institute of Technology Trumpington Street, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Cambridge. Cambridge MA 02139-4307 CB2 1PZ. USA e-mail: [email protected] e-mail: [email protected] tel: +44 (0) 1223 332779 tel: +1 617 253 0012 For information about the CMI initiative please see Cambridge-MIT Institute website :- http://www.cambridge-mit.org CMI CMI, University of Cambridge Massachusetts Institute of Technology 10 Miller’s Yard, 77 Massachusetts Ave. Mill Lane, Cambridge MA 02139-4307 Cambridge. CB2 1RQ. USA tel: +44 (0) 1223 327207 tel. +1 617 253 7732 fax: +44 (0) 1223 765891 fax. +1 617 258 8539 . DRAFT 2 CMI-MDP Programme 1 Introduction This dictionary/glossary has not been developed as a definative work but as a useful reference book for engi- neering students to search when looking for the meaning of a word/phrase. It has been compiled from a number of existing glossaries together with a number of local additions.
    [Show full text]
  • Hydraulics Manual Glossary G - 3
    Glossary G - 1 GLOSSARY OF HIGHWAY-RELATED DRAINAGE TERMS (Reprinted from the 1999 edition of the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials Model Drainage Manual) G.1 Introduction This Glossary is divided into three parts: · Introduction, · Glossary, and · References. It is not intended that all the terms in this Glossary be rigorously accurate or complete. Realistically, this is impossible. Depending on the circumstance, a particular term may have several meanings; this can never change. The primary purpose of this Glossary is to define the terms found in the Highway Drainage Guidelines and Model Drainage Manual in a manner that makes them easier to interpret and understand. A lesser purpose is to provide a compendium of terms that will be useful for both the novice as well as the more experienced hydraulics engineer. This Glossary may also help those who are unfamiliar with highway drainage design to become more understanding and appreciative of this complex science as well as facilitate communication between the highway hydraulics engineer and others. Where readily available, the source of a definition has been referenced. For clarity or format purposes, cited definitions may have some additional verbiage contained in double brackets [ ]. Conversely, three “dots” (...) are used to indicate where some parts of a cited definition were eliminated. Also, as might be expected, different sources were found to use different hyphenation and terminology practices for the same words. Insignificant changes in this regard were made to some cited references and elsewhere to gain uniformity for the terms contained in this Glossary: as an example, “groundwater” vice “ground-water” or “ground water,” and “cross section area” vice “cross-sectional area.” Cited definitions were taken primarily from two sources: W.B.
    [Show full text]
  • Rnase Refolding • General Features of Globular Proteins • Interior Packing
    Lecture Notes - 3 7.24/7.88J/5.48J The Protein Folding and Human Disease • Reprise RNase refolding • General Features of Globular proteins • Interior Packing Rnase Refolding We can cartoon the experiments: Assume that reduced form is unfolded and populates an ensemble of unfolded states in 8M urea: [Unfolded] [Intermediate] [Native] [U] Rapidly exchanging statistical ensemble of random coils [I] ??? [N] Native fold, $ S-S bonds, 1 out of 105 possible sets of S-S bonds [Aggregated] Non-native (no enzymatic activity), non-native (scrambled) disulfide bonds. At the end of the reaction we have native state Soluble inactive – misfolded or perhaps small oligomers Precipitated: Anfinsen showed that these were S-S bonded network = he called “scrambled” Critical question is nature of the intermediates as go from here to there: If there was a sequence in which these bonds formed, and one could figure out the sequence or pathway, it might give you considerable information on the steps in the folding pathway. So certainly we need to understand native-fold, and interactions that determine it, stabilize it once formed; However this does not solve problem We will return to the question after reviewing the general anatomy of globular proteins, which will occupy most of next week. 1 General features of 3-D structures of solved proteins; Globular, Soluble proteins: A. Isolation and Crystallization The first crystals of proteins sufficiently large and ordered to diffract X-rays were prepared of the digestive enzyme pepsin: Bernal, J. D., and Dorothy Crowfoot. Nature (1934): 133, 794. This was followed by crystals of insulin, Lactalbumin, hemoglobin, and chymotrypsin: Bernal, Fankuchen, and Perutz (1938) The rise to power of the Nazis in Germany and Italy and the outbreak of war brought all these studies to a halt.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Surface Energy Balance Models for Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration with Remote Sensing at High Spatiotemporal Resolution Over Large Extents
    Prepared in cooperation with the International Joint Commission A Review of Surface Energy Balance Models for Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration with Remote Sensing at High Spatiotemporal Resolution over Large Extents Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5087 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Cover. Aerial imagery of an irrigation district in southern California along the Colorado River with actual evapotranspiration modeled using Landsat data https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov; https://doi.org/10.5066/F7DF6PDR. A Review of Surface Energy Balance Models for Estimating Actual Evapotranspiration with Remote Sensing at High Spatiotemporal Resolution over Large Extents By Ryan R. McShane, Katelyn P. Driscoll, and Roy Sando Prepared in cooperation with the International Joint Commission Scientific Investigations Report 2017–5087 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior RYAN K. ZINKE, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey William H. Werkheiser, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia: 2017 For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment—visit https://www.usgs.gov or call 1–888–ASK–USGS. For an overview of USGS information products, including maps, imagery, and publications, visit https://store.usgs.gov. Any use of trade, firm, or product names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this information product, for the most part, is in the public domain, it also may contain copyrighted materials as noted in the text. Permission to reproduce copyrighted items must be secured from the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]