Montiaceae Claytonia Ogilviensis Mcneill

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Montiaceae Claytonia Ogilviensis Mcneill Claytonia ogilviensis McNeill Montiaceae Global Distribution: Endemic to Ogilvie Mountains of Yukon. Alaska Distribution: Intermontane Boreal Ecoregions Occupied: North Ogilvie Mountains. Conservation Status: SP G2G3. Description24, 75, 77 Flowers arranged in umbellate 2 cm clusters, bright purple Bracts leaf-like Stem leaves elliptic to ovate, abruptly contracted to petiole Basal leaves long- petiolated, orbiculate, often absent Tubers orbicular to elongate, 1 to 2.5 cm in diameter Illustration by Dominique Collet 71 Claytonia ogilviensis General: Perennial herb; tubers orbicular to elongate, 1 to 8 cm long, 1 to 2.5 cm in diameter; mature plants rhizomatous; stems 4 to 8 cm long. Leaves: Basal leaves often absent, long-petiolated, orbiculate, as long as wide, 0.6 to 1 cm long; stem leaves subtending the inflorescence in a pair, abruptly contracted to petiole, elliptic to ovate, 1 to 2.5 cm long, 5 to 18 mm wide. Flowers: Flowers arranged in umbellate clusters; bracts multiple, leaf- like; flowers 10 to 16 mm in diameter; sepals 5 to 7 mm long; petals bright purple, 8 to 14 mm long. Fruits: Seeds 2.4 to 2.5 mm in diameter. © Bruce Bennett 2012 Ecology Elevation: Known from 1,200 to 1,860 m in Yukon. Landform: Open mountain slopes, alpine ridges. Soil Type: Scree; associated with calcareous substrates. Moisture regime: Dry. Slope: Moderate to steep. Aspect: Often, but not limited to, south to southeast. 72 Claytonia ogilviensis Vegetation type: Sparsely vegetated. Associated species: No information available. Longevity: Perennial, likely long-lived as tubers are large and well- developed on some specimens. Phenology: Flowering in June. Population estimate: Nine known occurrences in Yukon; population sizes unknown. Similar Species24, 75, 77 Claytonia scammaniana, with its purple flowers, and Claytonia sarmentosa, with its rose-colored flowers, could be confused with Claytonia ogilviensis. Claytonia tuberosa has white petals with yellow bases but looks superficially similar to Claytonia ogilviensis when not in flower. The table below describes differences in morphology and habitat between these species. Stem Species Roots Stolons Bracts Habitat Leaves Tubers Stolons orbicular absent, Orbiculate; Calcareous Claytonia to rhizomes abruptly All bracts scree ogilviensis elongate, 1 present in contracted to leaf-like slopes to 2.5 cm mature petiole in diameter plants Lower Stolons Narrowly bracts Wet to Tuber absent; elliptic to leaf-like, moist Claytonia globose, 1 rhizomes oblanceolate; upper stony to 3 cm in tuberosa present tapering to bracts tundra diameter rarely base, sessile reduced slopes to scales Stolons Narrowly Claytonia absent; Lacking Scree Filiform lanceolate to scammaniana rhizomes bracts slopes ovate; sessile present Stolons Rocky present, Ovate to slopes, Claytonia bud- ovate- Lacking Filiform snow beds sarmentosa bearing; lanceolate; bracts in rhizomes sessile mountains present 73 Claytonia ogilviensis © Forrest Baldwin 2005 © Bruce Bennett 2012 74 .
Recommended publications
  • Evolutionary History of Floral Key Innovations in Angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes
    Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Elisabeth Reyes To cite this version: Elisabeth Reyes. Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms. Botanics. Université Paris Saclay (COmUE), 2016. English. NNT : 2016SACLS489. tel-01443353 HAL Id: tel-01443353 https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01443353 Submitted on 23 Jan 2017 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. NNT : 2016SACLS489 THESE DE DOCTORAT DE L’UNIVERSITE PARIS-SACLAY, préparée à l’Université Paris-Sud ÉCOLE DOCTORALE N° 567 Sciences du Végétal : du Gène à l’Ecosystème Spécialité de Doctorat : Biologie Par Mme Elisabeth Reyes Evolutionary history of floral key innovations in angiosperms Thèse présentée et soutenue à Orsay, le 13 décembre 2016 : Composition du Jury : M. Ronse de Craene, Louis Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux d’Édimbourg M. Forest, Félix Directeur de recherche aux Jardins Rapporteur Botaniques Royaux de Kew Mme. Damerval, Catherine Directrice de recherche au Moulon Président du jury M. Lowry, Porter Curateur en chef aux Jardins Examinateur Botaniques du Missouri M. Haevermans, Thomas Maître de conférences au MNHN Examinateur Mme. Nadot, Sophie Professeur à l’Université Paris-Sud Directeur de thèse M.
    [Show full text]
  • Portulacaceae – Purslane Family
    PORTULACACEAE – PURSLANE FAMILY Plant: herbs, rarely shrubs Stem: usually fleshy or succulent Root: Leaves: simple, entire, opposite or alternate, or in basal rosettes; stipules mostly absent, may be represented by fleshy structures or modified into hairs Flowers: perfect; 2 sepals usually, rarely up to 9; 2-4-6 or > petals, united or separate at base; stamens usually opposite each petal, or more numerous in a bundle; ovary mostly superior or partially inferior, few to many ovules Fruit: capsule Other: mostly in southern hemisphere; Dicotyledons Group Genera: 30+ genera; locally Claytonia (spring-beauty), Montia, Portulaca, Talinum WARNING – family descriptions are only a layman’s guide and should not be used as definitive Flower Morphology in the 2 or more sepals, 4-6 (rarely more, often Portulacaceae (Purslane Family) 5) free petals, leaves simple and entire, no stipules; stem often succulent Examples of common genera Shoreline Seapurslane [Virginia] Spring-Beauty Sesuvium portulacastrum (L.) L. Claytonia virginica L. var. virginica Purslane [Little Hog Weed] Portulaca oleracea L. (Introduced) Largeflower Fameflower [Rock Pink] Phemeranthus calycinus (Engelm.) Kiger Kiss Me Quick Portulaca pilosa L. PORTULACACEAE – PURSLANE FAMILY Ozark [Wide-Leafed] Spring-Beauty; Claytonia ozarkensis Miller & Chambers [Virginia] Spring-Beauty; Claytonia virginica L. var. virginica Largeflower Fameflower [Rock Pink]; Phemeranthus calycinus (Engelm.) Kiger Purslane [Little Hog Weed] Portulaca oleracea L. (Introduced) Kiss Me Quick; Portulaca pilosa
    [Show full text]
  • Claytonia Virginica & Claytonia Caroliniana: Spring Beauty
    Zachariah Wahid Ethnobotany (EEB 455) June 10, 2014 Instructors: Scott Herron and Adam Schubel Claytonia virginica & Claytonia caroliniana: Spring beauty Meeautikwaeaugpineeg Species Productivity Schedule Zachariah Wahid Ethnobotany (EEB 455) June 10, 2014 Instructors: Scott Herron and Adam Schubel Family: Montiaceae (formerly: Portulaceae) Latin Name: Claytonia virginica L., Claytonia caroliniana L. Common Names: Spring beauty, Fairy spud Anishinaabe Name: Meeautikwaeaugpineeg Taxonomy The genus Claytonia was named aFter John Clayton (1685-1773), an American botanist, physician, and clerk to the County Court of Gloucester County, VA where the species name virginica, meaning “oF Virginia”, comes From (Black & JudZiewicz, 2009; Couplan, 1998). C. caroliniana was similarly named aFter the Carolinas. The diFFerence in scientiFic nomenclature between these species reFlects a diFFerence in distributions and slight variation in morphology (C. virginica is sometimes referred to as narrow-leaved spring beauty). The Anishinaabemowin word For spring beauty is Meeautikwaeaugpineeg and it can be applied to both species since they are functionally the same For humans (Meeker & Elias, 1993). The Anishinaabemowin name may reFer to the plant’s preferred forest habitat and to the underground organs From which spring beauty’s most common use is derived. However, very few print or online sources (if any) exist that provide a literal translation of the word into English. The English common name, “Fairy spud”, was coined by a plant Forager named Euell Gibbons and has been used to describe the plant’s underground storage organ (Edsall, 1985; Thayer, 2006). Other names For the corm include “Indian potato”, “wild potato”, and “mountain potato” (Kuhnlein & Turner, 1991). The genus Claytonia used to be classiFied as a member oF the Family Portulaceae but was recently reclassiFied as a member oF the Family Montiaceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Sierra Azul Wildflower Guide
    WILDFLOWER SURVEY 100 most common species 1 2/25/2020 COMMON WILDFLOWER GUIDE 2019 This common wildflower guide is for use during the annual wildflower survey at Sierra Azul Preserve. Featured are the 100 most common species seen during the wildflower surveys and only includes flowering species. Commonness is based on previous surveys during April for species seen every year and at most areas around Sierra Azul OSP. The guide is a simple color photograph guide with two selected features showcasing the species—usually flower and whole plant or leaf. The plants in this guide are listed by Color. Information provided includes the Latin name, common name, family, and Habit, CNPS Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants rank or CAL-IPC invasive species rating. Latin names are current with the Jepson Manual: Vascular Plants of California, 2012. This guide was compiled by Cleopatra Tuday for Midpen. Images are used under creative commons licenses or used with permission from the photographer. All image rights belong to respective owners. Taking Good Photos for ID: How to use this guide: Take pictures of: Flower top and side; Leaves top and bottom; Stem or branches; Whole plant. llama squash Cucurbitus llamadensis LLAMADACEAE Latin name 4.2 Shrub Common name CNPS rare plant rank or native status Family name Typical bisexual flower stigma pistil style stamen anther Leaf placement filament petal (corolla) sepal (calyx) alternate opposite whorled pedicel receptacle Monocots radial symmetry Parts in 3’s, parallel veins Typical composite flower of the Liliy, orchid, iris, grass Asteraceae (sunflower) family 3 ray flowers disk flowers Dicots Parts in 4’s or 5’s, lattice veins 4 Sunflowers, primrose, pea, mustard, mint, violets phyllaries bilateral symmetry peduncle © 2017 Cleopatra Tuday 2 2/25/2020 BLUE/PURPLE ©2013 Jeb Bjerke ©2013 Keir Morse ©2014 Philip Bouchard ©2010 Scott Loarie Jim brush Ceanothus oliganthus Blue blossom Ceanothus thyrsiflorus RHAMNACEAE Shrub RHAMNACEAE Shrub ©2003 Barry Breckling © 2009 Keir Morse Many-stemmed gilia Gilia achilleifolia ssp.
    [Show full text]
  • Synopsis of a New Taxonomic Synthesis Of
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 8 October 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201808.0496.v2 Hershkovitz Montiaceae Synopsis of a new taxonomic synthesis of Montiaceae (Portulacineae) based on rational metadata analysis, with critical new insights on historically poorly understood taxa and a review of ecological evolution and phylogeography Mark Alan HERSHKOVITZ1 1Santiago, Chile [email protected] Abstract: Montiaceae (Portulacineae) comprise a clade of at least 280 species and ca. 30 subspecific taxa primarily of western America and Australia. This work uses existing phylogenetic metadata to elaborate a new cladistic taxonomic synthesis, and clarifies morphological circumscriptions of several poorly known species. A total of 20 taxa are validated, seven new and 13 necessary nomenclatural recombinations. Hypotheses of Montiaceae historical biogeography and phenotypic evolution are evaluated in light of recent metadata. Key words: Montiaceae, taxonomy, phylogeny, ecology, phylogeography, evolution. 1. Introduction This work presents a new cladistic taxonomy of Montiaceae (Portulacineae) and several of its included taxa, along with notes on the diagnostics of certainly poorly known species and a summary of new interpretations of phylogeography and phenotypic and ecological evolution. The present work includes 20 nomenclatural novelties. However, the whole of the novelty is greater than the sum of these parts. The generic circumscriptions and diversity estimates are modified from Hernández-Ledesma et al. (2015).The suprageneric taxonomy is the first proposed since McNeill (1974) and the only phylogenetic one. Critical reevaluation of certain common and usually misidentified Chilean taxa is the first since Reiche (1898). Existing metadata are interpreted as evidence for a hybrid origin of a genus.
    [Show full text]
  • A Reevaluation of the Ozark Endemic Claytonia Ozarkensis (Montiaceae)
    Yatskievych, G., R.J. Evans, and C.T. Witsell. 2013. A reevaluation of the Ozark endemic Claytonia ozarkensis (Montiaceae). Phytoneuron 2013-50: 1–11. Published 25 July 2013. ISSN 2153 733X A REEVALUATION OF THE OZARK ENDEMIC CLAYTONIA OZARKENSIS (MONTIACEAE) GEORGE YATSKIEVYCH Missouri Botanical Garden P.O. Box 299 St. Louis, Missouri 63166 [email protected] RANDALL J. EVANS Missouri Department of Conservation 551 Joe Jones Blvd. West Plains, Missouri 65775 [email protected] C. THEO WITSELL Arkansas Natural Heritage Commission 1500 Tower Building, 323 Center St. Little Rock, Arkansas 72201 [email protected] ABSTRACT Claytonia ozarkensis was described in 2006 as a near-endemic to the Ozarks, based on a small number of specimens from Arkansas, Missouri, and Oklahoma. Field work at voucher sites in Missouri and Oklahoma failed to relocate populations, which led to more detailed morphological study of specimens purporting to document the species. Several of these specimens, including the type of C. ozarkensis , were redetermined as a broad-leaved form of the widespread C. virginica . The remaining specimens continue to represent a novel taxon, which is described here as Claytonia arkansana Yatsk., R. Evans, & Witsell, sp. nov . The range of C. arkansana is even more restricted than originally believed, and the documented distribution of the taxon is limited to just three counties in the Ozark region of Arkansas. KEY WORDS: Arkansas flora, Ozark endemics, Claytonia , Montiaceae The genus Claytonia L. (Montiaceae) comprises some 27 species distributed in temperate North America and eastern Asia. Among these, the group of ca. nine tuberous species of Spring Beauties has been especially contentious taxonomically, in part because the plants are character-poor morphologically, having relatively simple and similar vegetative architecture and strong similarities in floral morphology.
    [Show full text]
  • Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes
    The floristic and community ecology of seasonally wet limestone glade seeps of Tennessee and Kentucky Kimberly Norton Taylor1 and Dwayne Estes Austin Peay State University Department of Biology and Center of Excellence for Field Biology Clarksville, Tennessee 37044, U.S.A. [email protected], [email protected] ABSTRACT An open, seasonally wet seep community supporting herbaceous vegetation occurs within the limestone cedar glade complex of the southeastern United States. The purpose of this study is to describe the floristic composition of these limestone glade seeps. A floristic inventory of 9 season- ally wet sites in central Tennessee and south-central Kentucky was performed, documenting 114 species and infraspecific taxa in 91 genera and 43 families. Vegetation analysis identified the dominant taxa as Eleocharis bifida (% IV 20.3), Sporobolus vaginiflorus (% IV 11.94), Hypericum sphaerocarpum (% IV 5.97), Allium aff. stellatum (% IV 4.71), Clinopodium glabellum/arkansanum (% IV 4.15), Schoenolirion croceum (% IV 3.89), Juncus filipendulus (% IV 3.89), and Carex crawei (% IV 3.84). Gratiola quartermaniae and Isoëtes butleri are also important members of the community and may serve as indicator species. A wetland assessment of the seep community was performed according to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual and appropriate regional supplements. Wetland vegetation requirements are satisfied in 8 of the 9 seasonally wet sites sampled. The limestone glade seeps appear to represent a previously unclassified seasonal wetland type. RESUMEN Una comunidad abierta, húmeda estacionalmente por filtración, compuesta por vegetación herbácea se da en el complejo de pantanos cal- cáreos de cedro del sureste de los Estados Unidos.
    [Show full text]
  • Common Native Forbs of the Northern Great Basin Important for Greater Sage-Grouse Tara Luna • Mark R
    United States Department of Agriculture Common Native Forbs of the Northern Great Basin Important for Greater Sage-Grouse Tara Luna • Mark R. Mousseaux • R. Kasten Dumroese Forest Rocky Mountain General Technical Report November Service Research Station RMRS-GTR-387 2018 Luna, T.; Mousseaux, M.R.; Dumroese, R.K. 2018. Common native forbs of the northern Great Basin important for Greater Sage-grouse. Gen. Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-387. Fort Collins, CO: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station; Portland, OR: U.S. Department of the Interior, Bureau of Land Management, Oregon–Washington Region. 76p. Abstract: is eld guide is a tool for the identication of 119 common forbs found in the sagebrush rangelands and grasslands of the northern Great Basin. ese forbs are important because they are either browsed directly by Greater Sage-grouse or support invertebrates that are also consumed by the birds. Species are arranged alphabetically by genus and species within families. Each species has a botanical description and one or more color photographs to assist the user. Most descriptions mention the importance of the plant and how it is used by Greater Sage-grouse. A glossary and indices with common and scientic names are provided to facilitate use of the guide. is guide is not intended to be either an inclusive list of species found in the northern Great Basin or a list of species used by Greater Sage-grouse; some other important genera are presented in an appendix. Keywords: diet, forbs, Great Basin, Greater Sage-grouse, identication guide Cover photos: Upper le: Balsamorhiza sagittata, R.
    [Show full text]
  • An Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials This Page Intentionally Left Blank an Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials
    An Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials This page intentionally left blank An Encyclopedia of Shade Perennials W. George Schmid Timber Press Portland • Cambridge All photographs are by the author unless otherwise noted. Copyright © 2002 by W. George Schmid. All rights reserved. Published in 2002 by Timber Press, Inc. Timber Press The Haseltine Building 2 Station Road 133 S.W. Second Avenue, Suite 450 Swavesey Portland, Oregon 97204, U.S.A. Cambridge CB4 5QJ, U.K. ISBN 0-88192-549-7 Printed in Hong Kong Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Schmid, Wolfram George. An encyclopedia of shade perennials / W. George Schmid. p. cm. ISBN 0-88192-549-7 1. Perennials—Encyclopedias. 2. Shade-tolerant plants—Encyclopedias. I. Title. SB434 .S297 2002 635.9′32′03—dc21 2002020456 I dedicate this book to the greatest treasure in my life, my family: Hildegarde, my wife, friend, and supporter for over half a century, and my children, Michael, Henry, Hildegarde, Wilhelmina, and Siegfried, who with their mates have given us ten grandchildren whose eyes not only see but also appreciate nature’s riches. Their combined love and encouragement made this book possible. This page intentionally left blank Contents Foreword by Allan M. Armitage 9 Acknowledgments 10 Part 1. The Shady Garden 11 1. A Personal Outlook 13 2. Fated Shade 17 3. Practical Thoughts 27 4. Plants Assigned 45 Part 2. Perennials for the Shady Garden A–Z 55 Plant Sources 339 U.S. Department of Agriculture Hardiness Zone Map 342 Index of Plant Names 343 Color photographs follow page 176 7 This page intentionally left blank Foreword As I read George Schmid’s book, I am reminded that all gardeners are kindred in spirit and that— regardless of their roots or knowledge—the gardening they do and the gardens they create are always personal.
    [Show full text]
  • I. Author Index
    I. Author index Adatia, R. D., Sharma, Y. B. & Vijaijaragliavan, Almén, O. see Almén, B. & Almén, O. M. R. Studies in the Gesneriaceae. I. Morphol­ Almquist, E. Ett par skånska hieracier av dansk ogy and embryology of Platystemma violoi- härkomst. 62: 101. des. 71: 25. — Vad är Hieracium auricula ß majus Wahlen­ Adsersen, H. Ombrophytum peruvianum (Balano- berg? (mit deutscher Zusammenfassung). 66: phoraceae) found in the Galåpagos Islands. 259. 76: 113. Al-Sani, N. see Fadeel, A. A. & Al-Sani, N. Afzelius, K. Some species of Pseudogynoxys from Al-Shebaz, I. A. see Al-Mayali, A.-R. A. & Al- Ecuador. 66: 233. Shebaz, I. A. Agarwal, S. see Chopra, R. N. & Agarwal, S. Amin, A. Chromosome counts of some Egyptian Ahlstrand, L. Embryology of Ursinia (Composi- plants. 72: 536. tae). 78:487. —• Seven chromosome numbers of Egyptian — Embryology of Arctoteae-Arctotinae (Corn- plants. 72: 537. positae). 79: 109. — liequest for seeds and flower buds. 78: 387. — Embryology of Arctotideae-Gorteriinae (Com- — On the genus Launaea Cass. 78:444. positae). 79: 371. Andersson, F. Soil moisture in relation to heath — Embryology of Arctotideae-Gundeliinae (Corn- and meadow vegetation. II. Soil moisture con­ positae). 79: 377. ditions in a tall herb meadow. 63: 376. Ahmad, K. J. Cuticular and epidermal structures — Ecological studies in a Scanian woodland and in some species of Eranthemum and Pseud- meadow area, Southern Sweden. II. Plant bio­ erantbemum (Acanthaceae). 74:256. mass, primary production and turnover of Akhtar, S. see Baquar, S. R., Akhtar, S. & Hu­ organic matter. 70: 8. sain, A. — Ericson, J. Soil moisture in relation to heath — see also Baquar, S.
    [Show full text]
  • *Hd,Pham-Hoang: Rong Vietnam
    FL.MALoBULL. 1923 ALGAE XII. Bibliography (continued from p. 1b72) The entries have been split into five categories: a) Algae - b) Fungi & lichenes - c) Bryophytes - d) Pteridophytes - e) Spermatophytes & General subjects. — Books have been marked with an asterisk. a) Algae: Abt>ott,l.A.: Yamadaella, a new genus in the Nemaliales (Rho- dophyta) (Phycologia 9, 1970, 115-123, 9 tig.). Segregate genus. & M.M.Littler: Some Rhodymeniales from Hawaii (Phyco- logia 8, 1969, 165-169, 5 fig.). 4 spp. recorded, 1 n.sp. Diatom£es r£colt£es Amoss£,A.: Note sur des en Indochine (Rev.Algol. 9, 1969, 326-344, pi.ls/17). Listed; few new or new names. Burkill.H.M., L.H.Greenwood-Barton & P.C.Crowther: Some studies of Malayan agarophytic and alginophytic sea- weeds (Gard.Bull.Sing. 22, 196b, 429-441, 3 fig., 6 tab., 7 pl.)• Chemical analyses. Cassie.V.: A free-floating Pseudobryopsis (Chlorophyceae) from Few Zealand (Phycologia o, 1969, 71-76, 7 fig.). Chang,Tsang-Pi: Some phytoplankton of Tamshui river from Kuantu to Shetzu (Taiwania 196b , 2 pi.). H, , 303-323, of and Keys to many species Chlorophyta Cyanophyta. Chapman,V.J.: A remarkable new red seaweed from New Zealand (J.Phycol. 5, 1969, 259-265, 22 fig., 1 photogr.). Domantay, J.S.: Aquatic "biological resources of the Philip- pines (Act.Manilana 4, 1968, 24-5»). is A brief survey of marine algae included. Hackett,H.E.: Marine algae in the atoll environment; Maldive Islands (Indian Ocean) (Proc.6th Int. Seaweed Symp. 6, 1969, 187-191). Some generalized notes; main spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Perspectives from Montiaceae (Portulacineae) Evolution. II
    Preprints (www.preprints.org) | NOT PEER-REVIEWED | Posted: 2 October 2018 doi:10.20944/preprints201809.0566.v1 Hershkovitz Montiaceae Ecological Evolution 1 Perspectives from Montiaceae (Portulacineae) evolution. II. Ecological evolution, phylogenetic comparative 2 analysis, and the Principle of Evolutionary Idiosyncraticity 3 4 5 Mark A. Hershkovitz1 6 1Santiago, Chile 7 [email protected] 8 9 10 ABSTRACT 11 12 The present paper reviews evidence for ecological evolution of Montiaceae. Montiaceae 13 (Portulacineae) comprise a family of ca. 275 species and ca. 25 subspecific taxa of flowering plants 14 distributed mainly in extreme western America, with additional endemism elsewhere, including other 15 continents and islands. They have diversified repeatedly across steep ecological gradients. Based on narrative 16 analysis, I argue that phylogenetic transitions from annual to perennial life history have been more frequent 17 than suggested by computational phylogenetic reconstructions. I suggest that a reported phylogenetic 18 correlation between the evolution of life history and temperature niche is coincidental and not causal. I 19 demonstrate how statistical phylogenetic comparative analysis (PhCA) missed evidence for marked moisture 20 niche diversification among Montiaceae. I discount PhCA evidence for the relation between Montiaceae 21 genome duplication and ecological diversification. Based on the present analysis of Montiaceae evolution, I 22 criticize the premise of the prevalent statistical approach to PhCA, which tests Darwinian
    [Show full text]