DOCSLIB.ORG

Shaping Scotland's Court Services a Dialogue on a Court Structure for the Future

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Shaping Scotland's Court Services a Dialogue on a Court Structure for the Future shaping Scotland’s court services a dialogue on a court structure for the future May 2012 1 a court structure for the future WELCOME This paper has been written for those attending one of the forthcoming dialogue events organised by the Scottish Court Service (SCS). The purpose of the event is to discuss ideas and questions that have emerged from work the SCS is doing to ensure our courts are structured to deliver the best possible service at an affordable cost, and to adapt to the significant legal reforms that are anticipated in the next few years. We hope you find the paper informative and thought provoking, and that it enables you to participate fully in the discussion. For others who may read the paper, we hope you too find it informative and thought provoking. There will be an opportunity for everyone to comment on the final proposals that emerge from our work when we publish a public consultation paper later this year. OBJECTIVES FOR THE EVENT We have structured each event around six objectives: 1. To understand the context of the reforms and financial drivers, and the SCS Board’s four key questions1; 2. To encourage discussion, and a shared understanding, on the likely future shape of the justice system; 3. To explore how court services might help support the future shape; 4. To explore fresh ideas that have not yet surfaced; 5. To gather the major issues that need to be taken into account; 6. To outline the next steps and the sharing of common themes. For convenience this paper follows the sequence of these objectives. 1 The four questions are set out on page 4. 2 OBJECTIVE 1 TO UNDERSTAND THE CONTEXT OF THE REFORMS AND FINANCIAL DRIVERS, AND THE SCS BOARD’S FOUR KEY QUESTIONS WHERE DID THE JOURNEY BEGIN? All institutions should, from time to time, review the structures through which they deliver their services, to ensure those structures remain relevant, effective and affordable. While Scotland’s court system has adapted over the years to new business and new ways of working, the underlying structure has remained largely unchanged. A network of courts across Scotland, many still of Victorian design, support the disposal locally of all types of court business. The High Court, while no longer travelling to all its historic circuit venues, still routinely hears cases in ten locations outside Edinburgh. This structure has generally served Scotland well, and the role of the courts in delivering local justice is valued by communities. Anything that is perceived to threaten the present structure stirs strong emotions. The SCS recognises and respects this, but we cannot ignore the significant changes to the system that Scottish Ministers have signalled their intention to bring forward in the next few years. The reforms recommended by Lord Gill’s review of the civil courts (which have an impact also on the criminal courts) and those of Sheriff Principal Bowen’s review of sheriff and jury procedure, in particular, will change fundamentally how business is done in our court system. Nor is the SCS immune from the general reduction in funding for public sector bodies in Scotland, and, in common with other such bodies, from the consequential need to find efficiencies in the way business is conducted. The operating budget for the SCS will reduce by 20% in real terms by 2014/15. For these reasons, therefore, the status quo is not a sustainable option for the SCS. The reform agenda presents a challenge to the Board of the SCS, the judiciary and to all who work in the justice system, to consider what form of court structure will best support those reforms within the reduced public resources available. It would be a singular disservice to the citizen if the Scottish Parliament introduces far sighted reforms, only to see them falter because we have failed to shape the underlying court structure to fit the new ways of doing business. This then is the challenge: to consider to what extent the current structure of the courts needs to adapt to be ready to support the anticipated reforms effectively, and, secondly, how this can be achieved within reduced operating costs. These elements are closely inter-related, and the work is not being approached merely as a cost reduction exercise. 3 In addressing this challenge, the Board of the SCS has posed four questions about the structure of our courts in the future. These are: 1. Could the High Court circuit be reduced and, if so, where should it sit? 2. Could sheriff and jury cases be consolidated into fewer centres and, if so, where should they be? 3. Could we manage with fewer buildings where we have more than one in any town or city? 4. Could we manage with fewer courts where we have more than one within a reasonable travelling distance? In trying to answer these questions, we have looked at the current structure, at where courts are situated, and how each operates in practice. We have anticipated the effect of the reforms proposed and how these would impact on the present structure, and we have taken into account the increasing use of video and other communication technology in the conduct of court proceedings, and the potential for increasing use to be made of this technology in the future. We have considered the outcome of this preliminary work and taken into account the Principles for provision of Access to Justice2 set down by the Lord President, the Lord Justice Clerk and the Sheriffs Principal. From our work have emerged some ideas and an illustration of a court structure that offer the beginnings of an answer. In September last year, we shared these emerging ideas with the judiciary and with the staff of the SCS across the country, and we are now looking in detail at the points raised in discussions with them. There is more work to be done before we have a detailed analysis to enable the SCS Board to come to a decision on a final set of proposals for public consultation. The Board has asked that this analysis take account of the views and ideas of key professional groups and others with an interest in the structure of our court system. This paper is intended to assist you to participate in one of a series of dialogue sessions being held to gather those views and ideas. The paper provides some factual background and an outline of the ideas emerging from our work on the four questions. A tabular illustration of the emerging ideas is provided (Appendix 2). Nothing has been decided. This is your opportunity to contribute to the discussion before the SCS Board receives proposals and considers what should be put out for public consultation later this year. 2 The Principles are reproduced as Appendix 1. 4 BACKGROUND Future justice system changes Major reform of the justice system is planned for the next few years. The most significant for the SCS will be the implementation of the recommendations in Lord Gill’s civil courts review,3 which also have significant implications for the criminal courts, and Sheriff Principal Bowen’s review of sheriff and jury business.4 Scottish Ministers have indicated their intention to implement the recommendations of these reviews. There are other outstanding recommendations that may have an impact of the way court business is conducted: for example those in Lord Cullen’s 2009 review of the conduct of fatal accident inquiries, Lord Carloway’s recent review of criminal law and practice, and those by the Commission on Women Offenders led by Dame Elish Angiolini QC, which were published in April. A Bill to create a single police service is currently before the Scottish Parliament, and further legislation on the rights of victims is anticipated. These too have implications for the court system. Assuming the recommendations of the Gill and Bowen reviews are implemented, the main changes to which the SCS will have to respond are: • a new salaried judicial office of summary sheriff5, below the level of sheriff, dealing with summary criminal cases, summary cause and small claims cases and some family cases. • a new sheriff appeal court dealing with both civil and criminal appeals from the sheriff courts and justice of the peace courts. • a sheriff personal injury specialist court, probably in Edinburgh, with other judicial specialisation managed within sheriffdoms. • the redistribution of civil cases from the Court of Session to sheriff courts, and at the lower level from sheriffs to summary sheriffs. • more active management of sheriff and jury cases, in particular a sheriffdom- wide approach to matching cases to court capacity. • increased use of videoconferencing and other arrangements to support vulnerable witnesses and victims of crime. 3 http://www.scotcourts.gov.uk/civilcourtsreview/index.asp 4 http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Publications/2010/06/10093251/0 5 Lord Gill recommended the new judicial officer should be styled a district judge, but the term summary sheriff is now being considered. 5 Future business volumes The amount of business we can anticipate coming before the courts is a significant factor in any assessment of future need. On the basis of discussions with the Crown Office and the police, we have taken the fairly cautious planning assumption that High Court and sheriff and jury business volumes will remain flat. The best assumption on summary criminal business is that a further 5 per cent of sheriff court cases will transfer to the justice of the peace courts during 2012/13, with a corresponding number of justice of the peace court cases transferring to direct measures.6 We are not assuming that a 5 per cent reduction in sheriff summary cases would lead to a corresponding 5 per cent reduction in sheriff summary sitting days, as previous experience suggests that the more serious summary cases left behind take proportionately more current sheriff court sitting time, but we assume that the reduction in cases will create some of the capacity required to maintain current levels of performance.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • 2 Legal System of Scotland
    Legal System of 2 Scotland Yvonne McLaren and Josephine Bisacre This chapter discusses the formal sources of Scots law – answering the question of where the law gets its binding authority from. The chapter considers the role played by human rights in the Scottish legal system and their importance both for individuals and for businesses. While most com- mercial contracts are fulfilled and do not end up in court, some do, and sometimes businesses are sued for negligence, and they may also fall foul of the criminal law. Therefore the latter part of the chapter discusses the civil and criminal courts of Scotland and the personnel that work in the justice system. The Scottish legal system is also set in its UK and European context, and the chapter links closely with Chapters 3 and 4, where two rather dif- ferent legal systems – those in Dubai and Malaysia – are explored, in order to provide some international comparisons. The formal sources of Scots Law: from where does the law derive its authority? What is the law and why should we obey it? These are important ques- tions. Rules come in many different guises. There are legal rules and other rules that may appear similar in that they invoke a sense of obligation, such as religious rules, ethical or moral rules, and social rules. People live by religious or moral codes and consider themselves bound by them. People honour social engagements because personal relationships depend on this. However, legal rules are different in that the authority of the state is behind them and if they are not honoured, ultimately the state will step in 20 Commercial Law in a Global Context and enforce them, in the form of civil remedies such as damages, or state- sanctioned punishment for breach of the criminal law.
    [Show full text]
  • Edinburgh, Lothian and the Borders Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements
    MAPPA Edinburgh, Lothian and the Borders Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements Annual Report 2010 – 2011 City of Edinburgh East Lothian West Lothian Midlothian The Scottish Borders Contents 1/ Foreword 2/ MAPPA in Lothian and Borders 3/ Achievements 7/ Future goals 9/ Statistical information Edinburgh, Lothian and the Borders Multi-Agency Public Protection Arrangements Foreword The Management of Offenders etc (Scotland) Act 2005 introduced statutory functions for Responsible Authorities – Local Authorities, Scottish Prison Service, Police and Health Service – to establish joint arrangements for the assessment and management of the risk of harm posed by certain offenders. Our Multi Agency Public Protection Arrangements (MAPPA) Annual Report provides an opportunity to present evidence of the successful work undertaken by MAPPA in Edinburgh, Lothian and the Borders by the Responsible Authorities and partner agencies with a duty to co-operate. We know from experience that managing risk can be highly complex, with staff having to make difficult decisions on a daily basis. We also know that sharing information, building a clear picture of the risk an individual offender presents and directing resources in the best possible way lessens the likelihood of re offending. Our Annual Report shows that the most serious offenders managed through MAPPA have been supervised effectively thereby preventing them re-offending and causing further harm. In addition, compliance has been high, with those who have not fully complied with notification requirements or statutory conditions returned to court or prison minimising the risk of further serious offences. Complacency is the enemy of safety. Effective risk management requires ongoing monitoring, review and evaluation.
    [Show full text]
  • Foi-17-02802
    Annex B Deputy First Minister’s briefing for James Wolffe meeting on 3 March 2016: Meeting with James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates 14:30, 3 March 2016 Key message Support efforts to improve the societal contribution made by the courts. In particular the contribution to growing the economy Who James Wolffe QC, Dean of Faculty of Advocates What Informal meeting, principally to listen to the Dean’s views and suggestions Where Parliament When Date Thursday 3 March 2016 Time 14:30 pm Supporting Private Office indicated no officials required officials Briefing and No formal agenda agenda Annex A: Background on Faculty and biography of Mr Wolffe Annex B: Key lines Annex C: Background issues Copy to: Cabinet Secretary for Justice Minister for Community Safety and Legal Affairs DG Learning and Justice DG Enterprise, Environment and Innovation Neil Rennick, Director Justice Jan Marshall [REDACTED] Nicola Wisdahl Cameron Stewart [REDACTED] John McFarlane, Special Adviser Communications Safer & Stronger St Andrew’s House, Regent Road, Edinburgh EH1 3DG www.scotland.gov.uk MEETING WITH JAMES WOLFFE QC ANNEX A Background The Faculty of Advocates is an independent body of lawyers who have been admitted to practise as Advocates before the Courts of Scotland. The Faculty has been in existence since 1532 when the College of Justice was set up by Act of the Scots Parliament, but its origins are believed to predate that event. It is self- regulating, and the Court delegates to the Faculty the task of preparing Intrants for admission as Advocates. This task involves a process of examination and practical instruction known as devilling, during which Intrants benefit from intensive structured training in the special skills of advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Scotland and the UK Constitution
    Scotland and the UK Constitution The 1998 devolution acts brought about the most significant change in the constitution of the United Kingdom since at least the passage of the 1972 European Communities Act. Under those statutes devolved legislatures and administrations were created in Wales, Northern Ireland, and Scotland. The documents below have been selected to give an overview of the constitutional settlement established by the devolution acts and by the Courts. Scotland has been chosen as a case study for this examination, both because the Scottish Parliament has been granted the most extensive range of powers and legislative competences of the three devolved areas, but also because the ongoing debate on Scottish independence means that the powers and competencies of the Scottish Parliament are very much live questions. The devolution of certain legislative and political powers to Scotland was effected by the Scotland Act 1998. That statute, enacted by the Westminster Parliament, creates the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Executive (now the “Scottish Government”), and establishes the limits on the Parliament’s legislative competence. Schedule 5 of the Act, interpolated by Section 30(1), lists those powers which are reserved to the Westminster Parliament, and delegates all other matters to the devolved organs. Thus, while constitutional matters, foreign affairs, and national defence are explicitly reserved to Westminster, all matters not listed— including the education system, the health service, the legal system, environmental
    [Show full text]
  • SOME OLD-TIME SCOTCH JUDGES. the Law Courts of Scotland Have
    SOME OLD-TIME SCOTCH JUDGES. The Law Courts of Scotland have been as famous for the person- alities of their Judges as for the quality of the law propounded and decreed therein, and few public institutions of ancient lineage have numbered among their members so many persons of marked character and individuality as the Court of Session in Edinburgh. In Scotland individual eccentricity has never been a barrier to merit and ability in the race for fame ; on the contrary, it has often been a powerful asset, and the records of her politics and public life teem with the personal eccentricities and outstanding peculiarities of her most distinguished citizens . The Court of Session, by which term the Law Courts of Scotland are described, has held since the date of the Union of the Crowns in 17'07 and still holds, a position of peculiar dignity. Mem- bers of Parliament and the higher Civil ;Servants have had by force of circumstances their residence in London,. and accordingly for two centuries the Law Courts have been left seised of the highest social position available in the world of Edinburgh, "mine own romantic town," as Sir Walter Scott loved to call it. As a result a Lord of Session has had a special prominence in . Scotland which none save a Peer of the Realm could dispute. They not only moulded the legal traditions of the country and by their de- cision affected the tone of its administration, but their influence upon its social life has been remarkable . In their roll are to be found some unworthy and commonplace names, but many of them are well worthy of resurrection from the vaults of local history to the day- light of the present generation.
    [Show full text]
  • British Institute of International and Comparative Law
    BRITISH INSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL AND COMPARATIVE LAW PROJECT REFERENCE: JLS/2006/FPC/21 – 30-CE-00914760055 THE EFFECT IN THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY OF JUDGMENTS IN CIVIL AND COMMERCIAL MATTERS: RECOGNITION, RES JUDICATA AND ABUSE OF PROCESS Project Advisory Board: The Rt Hon Sir Francis Jacobs KCMG QC (chair); Lord Mance; Mr David Anderson QC; Dr Peter Barnett; Mr Peter Beaton; Professor Adrian Briggs; Professor Burkhard Hess; Mr Adam Johnson; Mr Alex Layton QC; Professor Paul Oberhammer; Professor Rolf Stürner; Ms Mona Vaswani; Professor Rhonda Wasserman Project National Rapporteurs: Mr Peter Beaton (Scotland); Professor Alegría Borrás (Spain); Mr Andrew Dickinson (England and Wales); Mr Javier Areste Gonzalez (Spain – Assistant Rapporteur); Mr Christian Heinze (Germany); Professor Lars Heuman (Sweden); Mr Urs Hoffmann-Nowotny (Switzerland – Assistant Rapporteur); Professor Emmanuel Jeuland (France); Professor Paul Oberhammer (Switzerland); Mr Jonas Olsson (Sweden – Assistant Rapporteur); Mr Mikael Pauli (Sweden – Assistant Rapporteur); Dr Norel Rosner (Romania); Ms Justine Stefanelli (United States); Mr Jacob van de Velden (Netherlands) Project Director: Jacob van de Velden Project Research Fellow: Justine Stefanelli Project Consultant: Andrew Dickinson Project Research Assistants: Elina Konstantinidou and Daniel Vasbeck 1 QUESTIONNAIRE The Effect in the European Community of Judgments in Civil and Commercial Matters: Recognition, Res Judicata and Abuse of Process Instructions to National Rapporteurs Please use the following questions to describe the current position in the country for which you have been appointed as National Rapporteur. Please respond to the following questions as fully as possible, with appropriate reference to, and quotation of, supporting authority (e.g. case law and, where appropriate, the views of legal writers).
    [Show full text]
  • Coronavirus (COVID-19) Data Report: January 2021
    This publication will be available in accessible HTML on the gov.scot website. Justice Analytical Services Coronavirus (COVID-19) Data Report: January 2021 Published 25th February 2021 Summary This pack provides information on the impact of COVID-19 on the Justice system during January 2021. Data has been gathered from a number of different sources and may be subject to future revision. Public compliance This pack includes information on COVID-19 related interventions undertaken by Police Scotland. In addition to this, information on the public’s compliance with measures to help restrict the spread of COVID-19 is collected from surveys of the population. Findings from these surveys can be found in the Public attitudes to Coronavirus: January Update. Claimed compliance was high in November and December. Police activity Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service (COPFS), Courts & Prisons COPFS greatly reduced the Recorded crime was 6% lower over number of reports awaiting marking April 2020 to January 2021 January 2021. compared to the preceding year. To reduce footfall in lockdown, the The number of incidents remain majority of summary business was below 2020 levels. adjourned on 12th January. Domestic abuse incidents were 4% Community disposals were higher in April 2020 to January returning to 19-20 levels but there 2021 compared to the preceding remains a backlog of cases (and year. associated disposals) to conclude. Coronavirus interventions Initiations and disposals in the civil increased by 43% between court remain below 19-20 levels. December 2020 and January 2021. Prison populations decreased slightly as court business abated. The number of prisoners on remand remain at historically high levels.
    [Show full text]
  • Sheriff Appeal Court [2019] Sac (Civ) 030 Edi-F1024-16
    SHERIFF APPEAL COURT [2019] SAC (CIV) 030 EDI-F1024-16 Sheriff Principal I Abercrombie QC Appeal Sheriff P J Braid Appeal Sheriff H K Small OPINION OF THE COURT delivered by APPEAL SHERIFF H K SMALL in appeal by CM Pursuer and Respondent against ME-M Defender and Appellant Appellant: M Clark, advocate; Brodies Respondent: Malcolm, advocate; Thorley Stephenson; 24 July 2019 Introduction [1] The parties to this action had a relationship which began in 2000 and ended in September 2015. There is one child of the relationship, “A”, born on 5 September 2011. Since separation A has lived with her mother (the defender and appellant). In August 2016 her father (the pursuer and respondent) raised the present proceedings seeking an order for contact with A in terms of section 11 of the Children (Scotland) Act 1995. There followed a 2 series of court orders permitting interim contact, but on a supervised basis, contact generally being supervised by the defender and/or her mother. [2] The pursuer’s application for contact was opposed. After sundry procedure, the case proceeded to proof at Edinburgh Sheriff Court over five days in 2018. In January 2019 the sheriff issued a judgement in which he held that contact with her father was in A’s best interest. He granted the pursuer’s crave for contact, initially on a supervised basis, but thereafter progressing, over a period of eight weeks, to unsupervised contact. The defender now appeals that decision to this court. [3] The sheriff made 75 findings-in-fact, which, in large part, are not challenged.
    [Show full text]
  • Consultation on the Departure from Retained EU Case Law by UK Courts and Tribunals
    Retained EU Case Law Consultation on the departure from retained EU case law by UK courts and tribunals This consultation begins on 2 July 2020 This consultation ends on 13 August 2020 Retained EU Case Law Consultation on the departure from retained EU case law by UK courts and tribunals A consultation produced by the Ministry of Justice. It is also available at https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/departure-from-retained-eu-case-law- by-uk-courts-and-tribunals About this consultation To: The President of the Supreme Court The Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales The Lord President of the Court of Session The Lord Chief Justice of Northern Ireland The Senior President of Tribunals President of Scottish Tribunals President of Welsh Tribunals Judge Advocate General Scottish Government Northern Ireland Executive Welsh Assembly The Lord Advocate Attorney General for Northern Ireland Public Prosecution Service Northern Ireland International Law Committee The Law Society The Law Society of Northern Ireland The Law Society of Scotland City of London Law Society The Bar Council The Bar of Northern Ireland Faculty of Advocates Chartered Institute of Legal Executives Employment Lawyers Association Insolvency Lawyers Association Law Centre, Northern Ireland Director of Service Prosecutions British Chamber of Commerce Scottish Chamber of Commerce Northern Ireland Chamber of Commerce Confederation of British Industry Confederation of British Industry Scotland Confederation of British Industry Northern Ireland Institute of Directors Institute
    [Show full text]
  • O Ffending Behaviour
    Offending Behaviour 6 LOTHIAN & BORDERS LOTHIAN Review of Area Plan Priority 2.4 Offending Behaviour Annual Report 2008-09 What difference are we making? A variety of approaches has been agreed by the CJA to deliver improved services that directly address offending behaviour. Young Offenders, women offenders, offenders in the community, sexual offenders and domestic violent offenders have all been subject to the attention of multi-agency groups with real and measurable outcomes. How are we making a difference? Young Offenders: The development of the ‘Opportunities for Change’ project (Chapter 1) Women Offenders: Lothian and Borders Community Justice Authority Women Offenders group was convened to address the objectives for services to women offenders set out in L&B CJA Action Plan 2008-2009. These objectives recognise that assessment and intervention specifically suited to work with women offenders is underdeveloped both in Lothian & Borders CJA and nationally. These are: 17 • Research and/or develop a gender specific risk assessment tool for women • Develop gender specific programmes • Introduce a consistent and effective service to women across the CJA • Identify the most effective risk assessment tools and interventions for women offenders • Develop a programme to specifically look at abusive relationships for men and women • Design and deliver training for Social Workers to ensure women offenders are managed appropriately and consistently A major milestone in this work was the publication of ‘Chaotic Lives’ commissioned by the CJA Women’s Group and researched by Dr Barry & Professor McIvor. This has led to a new work programme to develop services for women and the CJA has re-prioritised Section 27 allocation in order that this can be achieved.
    [Show full text]
  • Notice of Meeting and Agenda
    Midlothian Integration Joint Board Thursday 6 December 2018 MAPPA Annual Report 2017/18 Item number: 5.11 Executive summary This report relates to the attached Lothian and Borders MAPPA Annual Report for 2017-18. The Annual Report is overarching and covers the overall operation of MAPPA in the Lothian and Borders area. This cover report adds some local context about the operation of MAPPA in Midlothian. Board members are asked to note the content of the report. # Report Report title 1 Purpose 1.1 This is a cover report for the Lothian and Borders MAPPA Annual Report 2017/18. 2 Recommendations 2.1 Members are asked to note the contents of this report. 3 Background and main report 3.1 MAPPA was established in Scotland in 2007 to co-ordinate the response of a range of agencies in the management of registered sex offenders and restricted patients. In March 2016 MAPPA was extended to include violent offenders assessed as posing a risk of serious harm. A Joint Thematic Review took place in 2015 and was carried out jointly by the Care Inspectorate and HMICS. The Joint Thematic Review found that MAPPA is well established across Scotland and that robust arrangements are in place to manage registered sex offenders with good information sharing and partnership working. The MAPPA Annual Report for 2017/18 showed no significant changes from the previous year. 871 registered sex offenders were managed in Lothian and Borders over this period with 781 being managed at Level 1, 90 at level 2 and 0 at Level 3. In Lothian and Borders 10 individuals were managed under the MAPPA extension as a result of the risk of violent offending.
    [Show full text]
  • West Lothian Criminal Justice Project
    West Lothian Criminal Justice Project Lothian & Borders Criminal Justice Board. Title : Final Report Reference : Issue : 1 Date : March 2007 Author : West Lothian Criminal Justice Project Team Total Pages : 68 Distribution Pages i and ii The document is the intellectual property of the Lothian and Borders Criminal Justice Board. All rights reserved. For additional copies, please contact [email protected] Not Protectively Marked Distribution List External Scottish Executive Justice Department Head Head of Criminal Justice Group Secretary National Criminal Justice Board Programme Manager Summary Justice Reform HMIC HMCIC AHMIC Crown Office and Procurator Fiscal Service Chief Executive & Crown Agent Deputy Crown Agent Head of Business & Policy Development Scottish Court Service Chief Executive Director of Field Services ACPOS General Secretary Council Members Secretary, Criminal Justice Business Area Scottish Legal Aid Board Chief Executive Director of Legal Services and Applications Others COSLA Vanguard (Scotland) Ltd Chair Review of Summary Justice Chair Grampian Clean Stream Project Board i Not Protectively Marked Internal – Sheriffdom of Lothian and Borders Sheriff Principal Criminal Justice Board Members and Secretary West Lothian Sheriffs COPFS Area Procurator Fiscal Business Manager West Lothian District Procurator Fiscal Project Procurator Fiscal Sheriff Court Clerk Deputy Clerk Lothian and Borders Police Convener of the Police Board Clerk to the Police Board Force Executive Head of Criminal Justice Administration Head of Corporate Communications Commander West Lothian ‘F’ Division Chief Inspector Criminal Justice ‘F’Division West Lothian Council Chief Executive Head of Criminal Justice Social Work Clerk to the District Court Defence Agents Project Board (as Annex C) Project Team (as Annex C) ii Not Protectively Marked Foreword The West Lothian Criminal Justice Project was commissioned by the Lothian and Borders Criminal Justice Board in June 2004 to try to improve the summary justice system through a Systems Thinking methodology.
    [Show full text]