Table of Contents I. List of Illustrations 2 Ii. Purpose
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Journal of the Thomas Nast Society Vol
Journal of The Thomas Nast Society Vol. 13 No. 1 1999 President's Message ALICE CAULKINS Nast on the Cover of Time RICHARD SAMUEL WEST Thomas Nast's Holidays JEFFREY EGER Dearest Sallie... Sarah Nast, the Woman Who Inspired Thomas Nast CHRISTINE JOCHEM 3D from 2D: An Authentic Re-creation of JOHN BATTRAM Thomas Nast's Santa Claus Costume AND JEFFREY EGER Clement Moore and Thomas Nast: Santa Claus in the Big Apple JEFFREY EGER Update: The World of Thomas Nast JOHN ADLER Thomas Nast and David Ross Locke: Mocking Birds of a Feather PAUL P. SOMERS, JR. Thomas Nast and the New York Illustrated News, Part IV: The War Between the States JEFFREY EGER Allusion and Illusion: The Robinson Crusoe of Thomas Nast JEFFREY EGER Contributors ii; Journal of The Thomas Nast Society Vol. 13 No. 1 1999 The Journal of The Thomas Nast Society is published annually by The Thomas Nast Society, a non-profit, tax-exempt organization. Its address is the Morristown-Morris Township Public Library, 1 Miller Road, Morristown, N.J. 07960, (Telephone: 973-538- 3473). The Journal is a benefit of membership in the Society. All correspondence should be sent to the Morristown address. Manuscripts are welcome. Please contact the editor for more information. Officers of the Society: Alice Caulkins, President; Christine Jochem, Treasurer. Board of Trustees: William R. Battey (honorary), Alice Caulkins, Chris Jochem, Jeffrey Eger, Marian R. Gerhart (honorary), Draper Hill (honorary), Ken Miller, Nancy Miller, Thomas Nast III (honorary), Michael Rockland, and Richard Simon. Editor: Jeffrey Eger Researcher: Asa Eger Layout and Design: Shalit Design Works © 1999 by The Thomas Nast Society V. -
What's in a Name
What’s In A Name: Profiles of the Trailblazers History and Heritage of District of Columbia Public and Public Charter Schools Funds for the DC Community Heritage Project are provided by a partnership of the Humanities Council of Washington, DC and the DC Historic Preservation Office, which supports people who want to tell stories of their neighborhoods and communities by providing information, training, and financial resources. This DC Community Heritage Project has been also funded in part by the US Department of the Interior, the National Park Service Historic Preservation Fund grant funds, administered by the DC Historic Preservation Office and by the DC Commission on the Arts and Humanities. This program has received Federal financial assistance for the identification, protection, and/or rehabilitation of historic properties and cultural resources in the District of Columbia. Under Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, the U.S. Department of the Interior prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, national origin, or disability in its federally assisted programs. If you believe that you have been discriminated against in any program, activity, or facility as described above, or if you desire further information, please write to: Office of Equal Opportunity, U.S. Department of the Interior, 1849 C Street, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20240.‖ In brochures, fliers, and announcements, the Humanities Council of Washington, DC shall be further identified as an affiliate of the National Endowment for the Humanities. 1 INTRODUCTION The ―What’s In A Name‖ project is an effort by the Women of the Dove Foundation to promote deeper understanding and appreciation for the rich history and heritage of our nation’s capital by developing a reference tool that profiles District of Columbia schools and the persons for whom they are named. -
Civil War Fort Sites 'J // AND/OR HISTORIC: '• T (Individual Fort Names Listed in No, 7 Description)
Form 10-306 (Oct. 1972) NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) m •L.UH* I Civil War Fort Sites 'J // AND/OR HISTORIC: '• t (individual Fort names listed in No, 7 Description) STREET AND NUMBER: Civil War Forts from Battery Kemble, N.W., to Fort Greble,-,S-.W, CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL. DISTRICT: Washington District of Columbia STATE: COUNTY: CODE District of Columbia 11 District of Columbia 001 til CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) |~1 District f~] Building [X| Public Public Acquisition: |~~| Occupied Yes: S] Site (17) d] Structure Q Private |~~1 In Process |X"| Unoccupied I | Restricted Q Object CD Bot" [~~| Being Considered I | Preservation work B2 Unrestricted in progress a NO PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) [~~] Agricultural Q Government S Park [ | Transportation | | Commercial f~"| Industrial | | Private Residence Other | 1 Educational n Military [~~1 Religious | | Entertainment |~~| Museum | | Scientific Department of the Interior, National Park Service REGIONAL. HEADQUARTERS: (It applicable) STREET AND NUMBER: National Capital Parks_____ 11QQ Ohio Drive. S. CITY OR TOWN: STATE: Washington District of Columbia 11 COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: National Capital Parks STREET AND NUMBER: 1100 Ohio Drive, S,W. CITY OR TOWN: 11 TITLE OF SURVEY: 4-Eort Park• " - System— " \.' DATE OF SURVEY: 1965 Federal State County Local National Capital Parks STREET AND NUMBER: 1100 Ohio Drive T S.W. CITY OR TOWN: CODE Washington District of Columbia 11 (Check One) | | Excellent ,| | Good I] Fair [~| Deteriorated fX| Ruins Jnexposed CONDITION n (Check One) (Check One) (X]Alte red |~~l Unaltered |_ t j Moved ££j Origina 1 Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (it known) PH YSI C AU APPE ARANC E A representative group of forts erected around the Nation's Capital have been acquired over several decades for park purposes. -
Civil War Fort Sites.Pdf
Form 10-306 (Oct. 1972) NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY - NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES ENTRY DATE (Type all entries - complete applicable sections) 151974 m Civil War Fort Sites ©J \ AND/OR HISTORIC: '• t (individual Fort names listed in No, 7 Description) STREET AND NUMBER: Civil War Forts from Battery Kemble, N.W., to Fort Greble, S.l, CITY OR TOWN: CONGRESSIONAL. DISTRICT: Washington District of Columbia STATE: COUNTY: CODE District of Columbia 11 District of Columbia 001 til CATEGORY ACCESSIBLE OWNERSHIP STATUS (Check One) TO THE PUBLIC |~1 District f~] Building [X| Public Public Acquisition: |~~| Occupied Yes: S] Site (17) d] Structure Q Private |~~1 In Process |X"| Unoccupied O Restricted Q Object CD Bot" [~~| Being Considered I | Preservation work [X] Unrestricted in progress a NO PRESENT USE (Check One or More as Appropriate) [~~1 Agricultural Q Government S Park [ | Transportation I | Commercial | | Industrial | | Private Residence n Other (Specif. RffiW I 1 Educational I | Military [~~1 Religious stp-r-isfr- | | Entertainment [~~| Museum | | Scientific Department of the Interior, National Park Service REGIONAL. HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) STREET AND NUMBER: National Capital Parks 11DO Ohio Drive^ SJ CITY OR TOWN: STATE: CODE Washington District of Columbia COURTHOUSE, REGISTRY OF DEEDS, ETC: National Capital Parks STREET AND NUMBER: 1100 Ohio Drive, S,W, CITY OR TOWN: Washington District of Columbia 11 TITLE OF SURVEY: DATE OF SURVEY: 1965 Federal State County Local National Capital Parks STREET AND NUMBER: 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. CITY OR TOWN: STATE: CODE Washington District of Columbia 11 To (Check One) Q Excellent | Good I] Fair [~| Deteriorated [3§ Ruins DU nexposed CONDITION (Check One) (Check One) [XjAltered |~~| Unaltered Q3 Moved (JJJ3 Original Site DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (//fcranvn) PH YSI C AU APPE ARANC E A representative group of forts erected around the Nation©s Capital have been acquired over several decades for park purposes. -
The Civil War Defenses of Washington
A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F. -
2013-Vol 70-4-Winter
LOYAL LEGION HISTORICAL J O U R N A L The Publication of The Military Order of the Loyal Legion of the United States VOL. 70 No. 4 150th Civil War Anniversary Commemoration Issue Winter 2014 Dedication day our score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated F to the proposition that all men are created equal. Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. We are met on a great battle-field of that war. We have come to dedicate a portion of that field, as a final resting place for those who here gave their lives that that nation might live. It is altogether fitting and proper that we should do this. But, in a larger sense, we can not dedicate -- we can not consecrate -- we can not hallow -- this ground. The brave men, living and dead, who struggled here, have consecrated it, far above our poor power to add or detract. The world will little note, nor long remember what we say here, but it can never forget what they did here. It is for us the living, rather, to be dedicated here to the unfinished work which they who fought here have thus far so nobly advanced. It is rather for us to be here dedicated to the great task remaining before us -- that from these honored dead we take increased devotion to that cause for which they gave the last full measure of devotion -- that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain -- that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom -- and that government of the people, by the people, for the people, shall not perish from the earth. -
The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices
A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defenses of Washington Part I: Appendices United States Department of Interior National Park Service National Capital Region Washington, DC Contract No. 144CX300096053 Modification# 1 Prepared by CEHP, Incorporated Chevy Chase, Maryland A Historic Resources Study: The Civil War Defens es of Washington Part I Appendices Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Appendix B: Alphabetical Listing of Known Fortification Owners, Their Representatives, and Fortifications on Their Land Appendix C: Naming of Forts Appendix D: Correspondence Concerning Appropriations for the Defenses of Washington Appendix E: General Reports about the Defenses Appendix F: Supplement to Commission Report Appendix G: Mostly Orders Pertaining to the Defenses of Washington Appendix H: A Sampling of Correspondence, Reports, Orders, Etc., Relating to the Battle of Fort Stevens Appendix I: Civil War Defenses of Washington Chronology Bibliography Appendix A. Alphabetical Listing of Forts,. Batteries, and Blockhouses Civil War Defenses of Washington Page A-1 Historic Resources Study Part I-Appendix A Appendix A: Alphabetical Listing of Forts, Batteries, and Blockhouses Fortification Known Landowner or their Representative Fort Albany James Roach and heirs, J.R. Johnson Battery Bailey Shoemaker family Fort Baker · Sarah E. Anderson, Ann A.C. Naylor & Susan M. Naylor Fort Barnard Philip J. Buckey, Sewall B. Corbettt Fort Bennett Wm. B. Ross, Attorney John H. Bogue, B.B. Lloyd Fort Berry Sewall B. Corbettt Blockhouse south of Fort Ellsworth Elizabeth Studds' heirs, George Studds Blockhouse between Fort Ellsworth & Fort Lyon, also battery Henry Studds Fort Bunker Hill Henry Quinn Fort C.F. -
C100 Testimony Before the NPS Regarding the Fort Circle Parks
A Call to Action on the Fort Circle Parks Draft Management Plan August 15, 2003 Introduction The Committee of 100 on the Federal City is the oldest citizens planning organization in Washington DC. Since its establishment in 1923, the mission of the Committee of 100 is to safeguard and advance the fundamental planning, environmental and aesthetic values inherited from the L'Enfant Plan and the McMillan Commission that give Washington its historic distinction, natural beauty and overall livability. It is within this tradition that we submit to the National Park Service our comments on the Draft Management Plan for the Fort Circle Parks. Pierre L'Enfant himself incorporated large green spaces throughout the city when he designed the nation's capital in 1791. Later, the Fort Circle Parks that were created out of the former Civil War Defenses of Washington, and the proposed Fort Drive to connect them, were part of the McMillan Commission's plan for the parks of the nation's capital in 1902. While today the Fort Circle Parks are largely unknown and generally neglected, the overarching fact is that they are, indeed, still here. The views from the former hilltop fortifications are spectacular. Equally impressive are the views of them, from nearly every part of the District of Columbia. Although never completed, starting in the 1930s the federal government acquired substantial amounts of the land for the proposed Fort Circle Drive. Together, the fortifications and linking parklands create a magnificent curtain of green, a natural backdrop that softens the edges of our national capital. They provide respite and recreation for neighborhoods throughout the city. -
Fort Circle &LOCATION STREET & NUMBER Location Is Widespread
r'I 'I -- -- - ,... ~ ,, "'- " / Form No. 10-306 (Rev. 10-74) I l ( UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR NATIONAL PARK SERVICE :NATIONAL REGISTER OF HISTORIC PLACES INVENTORY --NOMINATION FORM FOR FEDERAL PROPERTIES SEE INSTRUCTIONS IN HOW TO COMPLETE NATIONAL REGISTER FORMS TYPE ALL ENTRIES -- COMPLETE APPLICABLE SECTIONS DNAME AND/OR COMMON Fort Circle &LOCATION STREET & NUMBER Location is widespread. Please see description for _NOT FOR PUBLICATION 'J:' CITY. TOWN details. CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT Washington p.c. and vicinity VICINITY OF STATE CODE COUNTY CODE -~- DC MD and VA IJCLASSIFICATION CATEGORY OWNERSHIP STATUS PRESENT USE X-DISTRICT _J{iueLlc -OCCUPIED --AGRICULTURE. _MUSEUM _BUILDING(S) _PRIVATE -UNOCCUPIED -COMMERCIAL _:XpARK _STRUCTURE -BOTH _WORK IN PROGRESS _EDUCATIONAL -PRIVATE RESIDENCE :K_s1TE PUBLIC ACQUISITION ACCESSIBLE _ENTERTAINMENT -RELIGIOUS _OBJECT _IN PROCESS -YES: RESTRICTED _GOVERNMENT _SCIENTIFIC - -BEING CONSIDERED _xYES: UNRESTRICTED _INDUSTRIAL _TRANSPORTATION _NQ -MILITARY -OTHER: DAGENCY Department of the Interior, National Park Service REGIONAL HEADQUARTERS: (If applicable) National Capital Parks STREET & NUMBER 1100 Ohio Drive S.W. CITY. TOWN STATE Washington . - VICINITY OF District of Columbia llLOCATION OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION COURTHOUSE. REGISTRY OF oEEDS,ETc.National Capital Parks STREET & NUMBER 1100 Ohio Drive, S.W. CITY. TOWN STATE Washington District of Columbia II REPRESENTATION IN EXISTING SURVEYS TITLE. National Park Service survey in compliance with Executive Order 11593 DATE x_FEDERAL _STATE _COUNTY -LOCAL DEPOSITORY FOR SURVEY RECORDS National Capital Parks CITY. TOWN STATE Washington District of Columbia l BnESCRIPTION CONDITION CHECK ONE CHECK ONE -EXCELLENT _DETERIORATED _UNALTERED 2-loRIGINAL SITE _GOOD XRUINS !_ALTERED _MOVED DATE ___ _FAIR _ UNEXPOSED DESCRIBE THE PRESENT AND ORIGINAL (IF KNOWN) PHYSICAL APPEARANCE Fort Circle Park 1. -
Fort Mahan-Fort Stanton/Anacostia Metro
Civil War Defenses of Washington Civil War National Park Service US Department of the Interior A Hiker’s Guide to the Civil War Defenses of Washington Fort Mahan to Fort Stanton Self-Guided Tour First Edition March 2018 Library of Congress 2 Dear Hiker, “With the Anacostia and the Potomac below and the city of The Civil War Defenses of Washington, built by Union troops between 1861 and 1864, are an Washington spread out beyond engineering feat that transformed the vulnerable capital into one of the most fortified cities in and the hills of Virginia in the the world. The 1902 “MacMillan Plan” proposed a vehicular parkway connecting the Civil War distance, these are the most fortifications, many located on the topographic high points. Today the surviving sites–some with beautiful of the broad views to be had in the District.” preserved or reconstructed earthworks–are green spaces woven into the past and present of - MacMillan Commission Plan for the District neighborhoods in the midst of a densely populated city, and the connections between and among of Columbia (1902) Welcome them reimagined as a “greenway” and a continuous route for pedestrian travel. This guide complements two similar hiking guides and a hiking and biking brochure (see “Resources”). Together, the opportunity to explore the Civil War Defenses of Washington on foot could become one of the most unique experiences in the region. The overall route—exceptional in the National Trails System--is recognized as a segment of the Potomac Heritage National Scenic Trail (PHT), a developing network between the mouth of the Potomac River and the Allegheny Highlands. -
Fort Drive: Reestablishing Its Significance Within Washington, D.C.'S Park System Kathryn Kelly Finnigan Clemson University, [email protected]
Clemson University TigerPrints All Theses Theses 5-2012 Fort Drive: Reestablishing Its Significance Within Washington, D.C.'s Park System Kathryn Kelly Finnigan Clemson University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Recommended Citation Finnigan, Kathryn Kelly, "Fort Drive: Reestablishing Its Significance Within Washington, D.C.'s Park System" (2012). All Theses. 1360. https://tigerprints.clemson.edu/all_theses/1360 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses at TigerPrints. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses by an authorized administrator of TigerPrints. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FORT DRIVE: REESTABLISHING ITS SIGNIFICANCE WITHIN WASHINGTON, D.C.’S PARK SYSTEM A Thesis Presented to the Graduate Schools of Clemson University and the College of Charleston In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Historic Preservation by Kathryn Kelly Finnigan May 2012 Accepted by: Ashley R. Wilson, Committee Chair James L. Ward Ralph C. Muldrow Abstract This thesis is an in-depth examination of Fort Drive, a 20th century proposed parkway connecting the principal Union Army fortifications which encircled Washington, D.C. The goal of the work is to determine if the landscapes acquired for Fort Drive are eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. This paper answers two questions: what role did Fort Drive play in establishing the Nation’s Capital’s park system; and are the remnants of the Fort Drive endeavor significant? These questions were answered through analysis of the National Capital Planning Commission’s records, a comparison of the standards set by current National Register designations, and consideration of the National Park Service’s definition of a cultural landscape. -
Geologic Map of the National Parks in the National Capital Region, Washington, D.C., Virginia, Maryland, and West Virginia
Geologic Map of the National Parks in the National Capital Region, Washington, D.C., Virginia, Maryland, and West Virginia By Scott Southworth and Danielle Denenny Open-File Report 2005–1331 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey ii U.S. Department of the Interior Dirk Kempthorne, Secretary U.S. Geological Survey P. Patrick Leahy, Acting Director U.S. Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia 2006 For product and ordering information: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov/pubprod Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS For more information on the USGS—the Federal source for science about the Earth, its natural and living resources, natural hazards, and the environment: World Wide Web: http://www.usgs.gov Telephone: 1-888-ASK-USGS Suggested citation: Southworth, Scott, and Denenny, Danielle, 2006, Geologic map of the National Parks in the National Capital Region, Washington, D.C., Virginia, Maryland, and West Virginia: U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2005-1331, available only online at: http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2005/1331/. Any use of trade, product, or firm names is for descriptive purposes only and does not imply endorsement by the U.S. Government. Although this report is in the public domain, permission must be secured from the individual copyright owners to reproduce any copyrighted material contained within this report. iii Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Background .................................................................................................................................................