DOCSLIB.ORG

VALENTINIANISM and the GOSPEL of TRUTH in One of the Earlier

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
VALENTINIANISM and the GOSPEL of TRUTH in One of the Earlier VALENTINIANISM AND THE GOSPEL OF TRUTH BY R. McL. WILSON IN one of the earlier studies relating to the Nag Hammadi library it was suggested that a combination of the Gospel of Truth with the Apocryphon of John would produce the developed Valentinian system. In other words, the Gospel of Truth represents an early form of the system, before the incorporation of those Barbelognostic elements which occupy so large a place in the system that was known to Irenaeus. This suggestion, to my knowledge, has never been followed up in detail, although one has the impression that the Apocryphon would prove to be the dominant partner rather than the Gospel of Truth. Impressions, however, may be subjective and misleading, and have to be rigorously tested against the material available. What we do have is a paper by W. C. van Unnik, 1 in which he argues that the Gospel of Truth was written by Valentinus himself, before the development of the typically gnostic dogmas. He notes that "what the ecclesiastical writers make the principal point of their description and attack is here entirely wanting." There is no elaborate doctrine of aeons, no mention of a Demiurge in contradistinction from the highest God, and the primal sin is described not as the fall of Sophia but as proceeding from a not-knowing, a forgetting of the Father. Moreover we can see in the document "a certain reserve in its attitude to Docetism," and "though the content of the Gospel of Truth is Gnostic, its Gnosticism is not emphasised." This position is shared by van Unnik's colleague, G. Quispel,2 who writes in the same volume, "It appears that the opinions which it embodies reflect a stage in the development of doctrine prior to the division of Valentinianism into different schools. That means that our Gospel of Truth is very old and must have been written about A.D. 150, presumably by Valentinus himself." The third contributor 1 The Jung Codex (ed. F. L. Cross; London, 1955) 81-129; quotations from pages 98, 99, and IOI. 2 Jung Codex, 50. 134 R. McL. WILSON to the volume, H.-Ch. Puech, 3 agrees that the Gospel of Truth "must have been put together c. 150 A.o.", but is more reserved on the question of authorship: "Whether we reject or accept the plausible attribution to Valentinus himself of the letter to Rheginus, and perhaps also of the Gospel of Truth ... in any case it is highly probable that the whole content of the Codex Jung is the product of a single circle and that certainly three of the writings in it reproduce the Valen­ tinian doctrine in one of its most primitive forms." In his contribution to Hennecke-Schneemelcher,4 Puech writes that the document "is probably of Valentinian origin, and earlier than 180," but that one may hesitate to adopt van Unnik's conclusions in their entirety. The editors of the editio princeps 5 mention van Unnik's theory with respect, but are prepared to go no further than to say that the composition of the document may go back to about 150, and that the author may have been Valentinus or one of his immediate disciples. The theory has the general concurrence of Kendrick Grobe! and R. M. Grant, 6 although they do not agree on certain points of detail. Other scholars who have maintained a Valentinian origin, but without necessarily subscribing to the view that the work is by Valentinus himself, include A. D. Nock, H. Jonas, F. M. Braun and A. Orbe. 7 On the other hand, Ernst Haenchen 8 declared that the differences between the Gospel of Truth and Valentinianism were such that to pass from one to the other constituted a metabasis eis a/lo genos; but this is to ignore the possibility with which we began, that the differ­ ences are in large measure due to the assimilation into the developed Valentinianism of elements from some such system as that of the Apocryphon of John. H. M. Schenke, again, claimed that the Gospel of Truth shows nothing specifically Valentinian, and that its central ideas are more akin to the Odes of Solomon. 9 One problem here is 3 Jung Codex, 18-20. 4 Hennecke-Schneemelcher (E.T. ed. Wilson) I. 240f. 5 Evangelium Veritatis, ed. M. Malinine, H.-Ch. Puech, and G. Quispe! (Zurich, 1956) xivf. 6 K. Grobe!, The Gospel of Truth (London, 1960) 26; R. M. Grant, Gnosticism and Early Christianity (2d ed.; New York and London, 1966) 128ff. 7 Listed by Puech in Hennecke-Schneemelcher, 241 n. 2. 8 ZKG 67 (1955-56) 154; cf. also his survey in TRu 30 (1964) 47ff. 9 Die Herkunft des sogenannten Evange/ium Veritatis (Berlin, 1958). Links with the Odes of Solomon were also noted by F. M. Braun, RevThom 57 (1957) 597ff. and R. M. Grant, VC 11 (1957) 149ff. In an addition to the second edition of his Gnosticism (see above, n. 6) Grant writes, "What the Odes have in common with the Gospel of Truth is a speculative Jewish Christianity which comes close to Gnosticism but is not fully .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Figure of Melchizedek in the First Tractate of the Unpublished Coptic-Gnostic Codex Ix from Nag Hammadi
    THE FIGURE OF MELCHIZEDEK IN THE FIRST TRACTATE OF THE UNPUBLISHED COPTIC-GNOSTIC CODEX IX FROM NAG HAMMADI BIRGER A. PEARSON The first tractate of Codex IX of the Nag Hammadi library1 is clearly a very important document of "Christian" Gnosticism. Would that it were complete! As it is, not a single page from this document is completely preserved. Of the approximately 745 lines which this text comprised (1, 1-27, 10) only 130 are either completely extant or have been conjecturally restored. An addi­ tional 318 lines are partially extant or restored. Thus it is impos­ sible to understand fully the contents of this tractate, or even the meaning and context of some obviously important sections. Nevertheless it is possible to ascertain generally the position of this document in the development of Gnosticism as we know it from other texts. In thought-world, and particularly in its refer­ ence to key aeonic figures of the gnostic heavenly population, it resembles such other gnostic documents as the Apocryphon of John/ the Gospel of the Egyptians, 3 the Three Steles of Seth,4 * This article is an abbreviated version of the paper read at the Congress in Stock· holm. It has also been partially revised to take into account advances made over the past three years in the study of the text with which it is concerned. Pagination and placement of the major fragments of this text have been ascertained, and additional conjectural restorations have been made, largely on the basis of study of the original manuscript in the Coptic Museum, Cairo.
    [Show full text]
  • Gospel of Thomas Is the Most Important Manuscript Discovery Ever Made
    Introduction For those interested in Jesus of Nazareth and the origins of Christianity, the Gospel of Thomas is the most important manuscript discovery ever made. Apart from the canonical scriptures and a few scattered sayings, the Gospel of Thomas is our only historically valuable source for the teach- ings of Jesus. Although it has been available in European languages since the 1950s, it is still subject to intense scrutiny and debate by biblical schol- ars. The Gospel of Thomas is roughly the same age as the canonical New Testament gospels, but it contains sayings of Jesus that present very dif- ferent views on religion and on the nature of humanity and salvation, and it thereby raises the question whether the New Testament’s version of Jesus’ teachings is entirely accurate and complete. In late 1945, an Egyptian peasant named Mohammed Ali al-Samman Mohammad Khalifa rode his camel to the base of a cliff, hoping to find fertilizer to sell in the nearby village of Nag Hammadi. He found, instead, a large sealed pottery jar buried in the sand. He feared it might contain a genie that would haunt or attack him, and he hoped it might contain a treasure. Gathering his courage, he smashed open the jar and discov- ered only a collection of twelve old books. Suspecting that they might have value on the antiquities market, he kept the books and eventually sold them for a small sum. The books gradually came into the hands of scholars in Cairo, Europe, and America. Today those books are known as the Nag Hammadi library, a collection that is generally considered to be the most important archaeological discovery of the twentieth cen- tury for research into the New Testament and early Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • GNOSIS and NAG HAMMADI Anne Mcguire
    12 GNOSIS AND NAG HAMMADI Anne McGuire Introduction Introductory remarks on “gnosis” and “Gnosticism” “Gnosticism” is a modern European term that !rst appears in the seventeenth-century writings of Cambridge Platonist Henry More (1614–87). For More, “Gnosticism” designates one of the earliest Christian heresies, connected to controversies addressed in Revelation 2:18–29 and in his own day.1 The term “gnosis,” on the other hand, is one of several ancient Greek nouns for “knowledge,” speci!cally experiential or esoteric knowledge based on direct experience, which can be distinguished from mere perception, understanding, or skill. For Plato and other ancient thinkers, “gnosis” refers to that knowledge which enables perception of the underlying structures of reality, Being itself, or the divine.2 Such gnosis was valued highly in many early Christian communities,3 yet the claims of some early Christians to possess gnosis came under suspicion and critique in the post-Pauline letter of 1 Timothy, which urges its readers to “avoid the profane chatter and contradictions of falsely so-called gnosis.”4 With this began the polemical contrast between “false gnosis” and “true faith.” It is this polemical sense of “false gnosis” that Bishop Irenaeus of Lyons took up in the title of his major anti-heretical work: Refutation and Overthrow of Falsely So-Called Gnosis, or Against Heresies, written c. "# 180.5 Irenaeus used 1 Timothy’s phrase not only to designate his opponents’ gnosis as false, but, even more important, to construct a broad category of
    [Show full text]
  • New Testament and the Lost Gospel
    New Testament And The Lost Gospel Heliometric Eldon rear her betrayal so formerly that Aylmer predestines very erectly. Erodent and tubular Fox expresses Andrewhile fusible nickers Norton pertly chiviedand harp her her disturbances corsair. rippingly and peace primarily. Lou often nabs wetly when self-condemning In and the real life and What route the 17 books of prophecy in the Bible? Hecksher, although he could participate have been ignorant on it if not had suchvirulent influence and championed a faith so subsequent to issue own. God, he had been besieged by students demanding to know what exactly the church had to hide. What was the Lost Books of the Bible Christianity. Gnostic and lost gospel of christianity in thismaterial world with whom paul raising the news is perhaps there. Will trump Really alive All My Needs? Here, are called the synoptic gospels. Hannah biblical figure Wikipedia. Church made this up and then died for it, and in later ages, responsible for burying the bodies of both after they were martyred and then martyred themselves in the reign of Nero. Who was busy last transcript sent by God? Judas gospel of gospels makes him in? Major Prophets Four Courts Press. Smith and new testament were found gospel. Digest version of jesus but is not be; these scriptures that is described this website does he is a gospel that? This page and been archived and about no longer updated. The whole Testament these four canonical gospels which are accepted as she only authentic ones by accident great. There has also acts or pebble with names of apostles appended to them below you until The Acts of Paul, their leash as independent sources of information is questionable, the third clue of Adam and Eve.
    [Show full text]
  • THE GNOSTIC SOCIETY LIBRARY “The Nag Hammadi Library”
    THE GNOSTIC SOCIETY LIBRARY “The Nag Hammadi Library” The “Nag Hammadi Library” is a collection of early Christian Gnostic texts discovered near the Egyptian town of Nag Hammadi, in 1945. Nag Hammadi library The Nag Hammadi library (popularly known as The Gnostic Gospels) is a collection of early Christian Gnostic texts discovered near the town of Nag Hammâdi in 1945. That year, twelve leather-bound papyrus codices buried in a sealed jar were found by a local peasant named Mohammed Ali. The writings in these codices comprised fifty-two mostly Gnostic tractates (treatises), but they also include three works belonging to the Corpus Hermeticum and a partial translation / alteration of Plato's “Republic”. In his "Introduction" to “The Nag Hammadi Library” in English, James Robinson suggests that these codices may have belonged to a nearby Pachomian monastery, and were buried after Bishop Athanasius condemned the uncritical use of non-canonical books in his Festal Letter of 367 AD. The contents of the codices were written in Coptic, though the works were probably all translations from Greek. The best-known of these works is probably the “Gospel of Thomas”, of which the “Nag Hammadi Codices” contain the only complete text. After the discovery it was recognized that fragments of these sayings of Jesus appeared in manuscripts discovered at Oxyrhynchus in 1898, and matching quotations were recognized in other early Christian sources. Subsequently, a 1st or 2nd century date of composition circa 80 AD for the lost Greek originals of the Gospel of Thomas has been proposed, though this is disputed by many if not the majority of biblical matter researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • Nag Hammadi, Gnosticism and New Testament Interpretation
    Grace Theological Journal 8.2 (1987) 195-212 Copyright © 1987 by Grace Theological Seminary. Cited with permission. NAG HAMMADI, GNOSTICISM AND NEW TESTAMENT INTERPRETATION WILLIAM W. COMBS The Gnostic heresy alluded to in the NT and widely repudiated by Christian writers in the second century and after has been in- creasingly studied in the last forty years. The discovery in upper Egypt of an extensive collection of Gnostic writings on papyri trans- formed a poorly known movement in early Christianity into a well documented heresy of diverse beliefs and practices. The relationship of Gnosticism and the NT is an issue that has not been resolved by the new documents. Attempts to explain the theology of the NT as dependent on Gnostic teachings rest on ques- tionable hypotheses. The Gnostic redeemer-myth cannot be docu- mented before the second century: Thus, though the Gnostic writings provide helpful insight into the heresies growing out of Christianity, it cannot be assumed that the NT grew out of Gnostic teachings. * * * INTRODUCTION STUDENTS of the NT have generally been interested in the subject of Gnosticism because of its consistent appearance in discussions of the "Colossian heresy" and the interpretation of John's first epistle. It is felt that Gnosticism supplies the background against which these and other issues should be understood. However, some who use the terms "Gnostic" and "Gnosticism" lack a clear understanding of the movement itself. In fact, our knowledge of Gnosticism has suffered considerably from a lack of primary sources. Now, however, with the discovery of the Nag Hammadi (hereafter, NH) codices, this void is being filled.
    [Show full text]
  • EARL 8/2 No. 2
    ATTRIDGE/VALENTINIAN AND SETHIAN APOCALYPSES 173 Valentinian and Sethian Apocalyptic Traditions* HAROLD W. ATTRIDGE The paper reexamines the relationship between “apocalyptic” and “gnostic” traditions, on the assumption that global definitions of these phenomena are problematic. Valentinian and Sethian corpora in the Nag Hammadi collection display different appropriations of apocalyptic literary forms and conceptual schemes. Apart from a few late works with traces of Valentinian positions, this tradition largely ignores features characteristic of apocalyptic literature. Valentinian eschatology seems to be founded primarily on philosophical cosmology and psychology. Sethian texts preserve many features of Jewish revelatory literature, and many details associated with various eschatological schemes familiar from apocalyptic sources. The most extensive use of the characteristic “heavenly ascent” topos in Sethian literature, however, seems to be a third-century development, perhaps responding to contemporary forms of religious propaganda. It has been almost forty years since R. M. Grant made his famous, and frequently discussed, suggestion that Gnosticism was born out of disap- pointed apocalyptic hopes.1 While containing an element of truth, the very formulation seems curiously dated. At the end of the millennium we are much more aware of the difficulties of dealing with each term of *A version of this paper was presented to the joint session of the Nag Hammadi and Pseudepigrapha groups at the annual meeting of the Society of Biblical Literature in Orlando, November 22, 1998. The subject of the joint session was the relationship of “apocalyptic” and “Gnosticism.” 1. Robert M. Grant, Gnosticism and Early Christianity (New York: Columbia University Press, 1959; rev. ed. 1966), 27–38.
    [Show full text]
  • The Demiurge in Ancient Thought: Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators Carl Sean´ O’Brien Frontmatter More Information
    Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07536-8 - The Demiurge in Ancient Thought: Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators Carl Sean´ O’brien Frontmatter More information THE DEMIURGE IN ANCIENT THOUGHT How was the world generated and how does matter continue to be ordered so that the world can continue functioning? Questions like these have existed as long as humanity has been capable of rational thought. In antiquity, Plato’s Timaeus introduced the concept of the Demiurge, or Craftsman-god, to answer them. This lucid and wide- ranging book argues that the concept of the Demiurge was highly influential on the many discussions operating in Middle Platonist, Gnostic, Hermetic and Christian contexts in the first three centuries ad. It explores key metaphysical problems such as the origin of evil, the relationship between matter and the First Principle and the deploy- ment of ever-increasing numbers of secondary deities to insulate the First Principle from the sensible world. It also focuses on the decreas- ing importance of demiurgy in Neoplatonism, with its postulation of procession and return. carl sean´ o’brien is Alexander von Humboldt Fellow in the Department of Philosophy at Ruprecht-Karls-Universitat¨ Heidelberg and Research Associate, Centre for the Study of the Platonic Tradition, Trinity College, Dublin. © in this web service Cambridge University Press www.cambridge.org Cambridge University Press 978-1-107-07536-8 - The Demiurge in Ancient Thought: Secondary Gods and Divine Mediators Carl Sean´ O’brien Frontmatter More information © in
    [Show full text]
  • Conversion and Gnosis in the "Gospel of Truth"
    Haverford College Haverford Scholarship Faculty Publications Religion 1986 Conversion and gnosis in the "Gospel of Truth" Anne Marie McGuire Haverford College, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.haverford.edu/religion_facpubs Repository Citation McGuire, Anne. "Conversion and Gnosis in the Gospel of Truth." Novum Testamentum 28 (1986): 338-55. This Journal Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Religion at Haverford Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Publications by an authorized administrator of Haverford Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Conversion and Gnosis in the "Gospel of Truth" Author(s): Anne McGuire Source: Novum Testamentum, Vol. 28, Fasc. 4 (Oct., 1986), pp. 338-355 Published by: BRILL Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1560588 . Accessed: 12/04/2013 12:13 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. BRILL is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Novum Testamentum. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 165.82.168.47 on Fri, 12 Apr 2013 12:13:11 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions Novum Testamentum XXVIII, 4 (1986) CONVERSION AND GNOSIS IN THE GOSPEL OF TRUTH by ANNE McGUIRE Haverford College, Haverford, Pa.
    [Show full text]
  • INTRODUCTION Writing in the Late Fourth Century, Epiphanius Of
    CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION Writing in the late fourth century, Epiphanius of Salamis described a group of so-called Phibionite Gnostics that he encountered in Egypt as follows: “. having recognized one another, they hasten to dine. And they lavish meat dishes and wines, even if they are in penury. Th en, aft er a drinking party where so to speak they have engorged their veins with gormandising, they turn to their frenzied passion” (Pan. 26.4.3).1 Epiphanius, however, does not stop here with his description of the ethics and social interactions of these so-called “heretics.” We are later informed that the ritual performances of these sectarians include vari- ous immoral practices that should, for Epiphanius’ audience, revolt the moral sensibilities of a fourth-century Christian. We learn that these sectarians engaged in illicit sexual activities (orgies so excessive as to lead to male homosexual relations), the consumption of menstrual blood and semen, and even the ritual cannibalism of aborted foetuses that were conceived during these ritual activities. Epiphanius claims to have withstood the lure of these heretics, a lure that took the form of seductive women. Th ese polemical barbs directed by Epiphanius against those Christians he considered heretical, though recognized within scholarship as largely hyperbole if not outright fi ction, typifi ed much of how ethics within Gnosticism was viewed by not only ancient polemists but also some modern discussions of ethics.2 Irenaeus, when he moved to southern Gaul in the late second century, encountered what he referred to as followers of Valentinus, specifi cally of Valentinus’ disciple Marcus.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Ancient Apocryphal Gospels
    MARKus BOcKMuEhL Ancient Apocryphal Gospels Interpretation Resources for the Use of Scripture in the Church BrockMuehl_Pages.indd 3 11/11/16 9:39 AM © 2017 Markus Bockmuehl First edition Published by Westminster John Knox Press Louisville, Kentucky 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26—10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage or retrieval system, without permission in writing from the pub- lisher. For information, address Westminster John Knox Press, 100 Witherspoon Street, Louisville, Kentucky 40202- 1396. Or contact us online at www.wjkbooks.com. Scripture quotations are from the New Revised Standard Version of the Bible, copyright © 1989 by the Division of Christian Education of the National Council of the Churches of Christ in the U.S.A. and are used by permission. Map of Oxyrhynchus is printed with permission by Biblical Archaeology Review. Book design by Drew Stevens Cover design by designpointinc.com Library of Congress Cataloging- in- Publication Data Names: Bockmuehl, Markus N. A., author. Title: Ancient apocryphal gospels / Markus Bockmuehl. Description: Louisville, KY : Westminster John Knox Press, 2017. | Series: Interpretation: resources for the use of scripture in the church | Includes bibliographical references and index. Identifiers: LCCN 2016032962 (print) | LCCN 2016044809 (ebook) | ISBN 9780664235895 (hbk. : alk. paper) | ISBN 9781611646801 (ebook) Subjects: LCSH: Apocryphal Gospels—Criticism, interpretation, etc. | Apocryphal books (New Testament)—Criticism, interpretation, etc. Classification: LCC BS2851 .B63 2017 (print) | LCC BS2851 (ebook) | DDC 229/.8—dc23 LC record available at https://lccn.loc.gov/2016032962 The paper used in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences—Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48- 1992.
    [Show full text]
  • How Reliable Is the Story of the Nag Hammadi Discovery?
    Article Journal for the Study of the New Testament How Reliable is the Story of 35(4) 303 –322 © The Author(s) 2013 the Nag Hammadi Discovery? Reprints and permissions: sagepub.co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/0142064X13482243 jsnt.sagepub.com Mark Goodacre Duke University, USA Abstract James Robinson’s narrative of how the Nag Hammadi codices were discovered is popular and compelling, a piece of fine investigative journalism that includes intrigue and blood vengeance. But there are several different, conflicting versions of the story, including two-person (1977), seven-person (1979) and eight-person (1981) versions. Disagreements include the name of the person who first found the jar. Martin Krause and Rodolphe Kasser both questioned these stories in 1984, and their scepticism is corroborated by the Channel 4 (UK) series, The Gnostics (1987), which features Muhammad ‘Ali himself, in his only known appearance in front of camera, offering his account of the discovery. Several major points of divergence from the earlier reports raise questions about the reliability of ‘Ali’s testimony. It may be safest to conclude that the earlier account of the discovery offered by Jean Doresse in 1958 is more reliable than the later, more detailed, more vivid versions that are so frequently retold. Keywords Nag Hammadi, discovery, James Robinson, Jean Doresse, the Gnostics The ‘Canonical’ Nag Hammadi Story The story of the discovery of the Nag Hammadi codices in 1945 has attained near canonical status in scholarship of early Christianity. James Robinson’s compelling narrative of how Muhammad ‘Ali al-Samman and his brothers unearthed the jar containing the codices combines skilled investigative journal- ism with tales of intrigue and blood vengeance.1 It is a staple of introductory 1.
    [Show full text]