If you have issues viewing or accessing this file contact us at NCJRS.gov.

/ L<" Judicial Conference ll~i"1 Of The State Of 1974

OFFICE OF THE STATE COURT ADMINISTRATOR Ex Officio EXECUTIVE SECRETARY TO THE CONFERENCE - Supreme Court Building Salem Oregon ------,---

Table of Contents

Me " & & -

Page

Supreme Court Justices ...... 3

Court of Appeals Judges ...... ~3

Tax Court Judge ...... 3

Circuit Court Judges ...... 4

District Court Judges ...... 6

Oregon's Court Structure ...... 8

Map showing Judicial Districts ...... 9

Executive Committee of Judicial Conference ...... 10

Oregon Judicial Conference Activities· 1974 ...... 11

Work of the Standing Committees of the Conference ...... 12

Reports of the Judges Associations ...... 17-18

Courts Generally ...... 18

The Courts of Oregon ...... '.' ...... 20

Committees of the Judicial Conference ...... 23

t ORS Statutes on Judicial Conference ...... 28 r By-Laws of Judicial Conference ...... 29 J Constitution of Oregon Article VII {Amended} Judicial Department ...... 30

r l' / \', -- ... t Oregon State Courts

1A4 'P 1M :r

Supreme Court

Kenneth J. O'Connell, Chief Justice

William M. McAllister, Associate Justice Arno H. Denecke, Associate Justice Ralph M. Holman, Associate Justice Thomas H. Tongue, Associate Justice Edward H. Howell, Associate Justice Dean Bryson, Associate Justice

Couri of Appeals

Herbert M. Schwab, Chief Judge

Virgil Langtry, Associate Judge Robert H. Foley, Associate Judge William S. Fort, Associate Judge Robert Y. Thornton, Associate Judge , Associate Judge

Tax Court

Carlisle B. Roberts, Judge

-3- Circuit Courts Circuit Courts Cont. _it ==

Counties Included Name District No. _____Counties~.:..;:,c.;:. Included____~._~ __.__ ~ ______•_____ ._._. __ Name ~====~------1. Jackson James M. Main 6. Morrow William W. Wells Josephine Samuel M. Bowe Umatilla Henry M. Kaye Loren L. Sawyer Mitchell Karaman 7. Hood River, Wasco, John A. Jelderks Sherman 2. Lane Edward Leavy . Roland K. Rodman 8. Baker lyle ~: Wolff F. Gordon Cottrell Edwin E. Allen 9. Harney, Malheur Jeff D. Dorroh Douglas R. Spencer Helen J. Frye 10. Union, Wallowa W.F. Brownton

3. Marion Jena V. Schlegel 11. Gilliam, Grant, Crook, J. R. Campbell Val D. Sloper Deschutes, Jefferson, Wheeler John M. Copenhaver Joseph B. Felton George A. Jones 12. Polk Darrell J. Williams (Resigned 8-15-74) Yamhill Kurt C. Rossman Duane R. Ertsgaard Richard D. Barber 13. Klamath L. Orth Sisemore (Apptd. 9-3-74) Donald A.W. Piper 4. Multnomah James R. Ellis 14. Lake Richard J. Burke Charles H. Foster Clifford B. Olsen Alan F. Davis 15. Coos, Curry James A. Norman John C. Beatty, Jr. John C. Warden Berkeley Lent William S. McLennan 16. Douglas Don H. Sanders Alfred T. Sulmonetti Charles S. Woodrich Phillip J. Roth Robert E. Jones 17. Lincoln Eugene K. Richardson George Van Hoomissen 19. Clatsop, Columbia, Jean L. Lewis Thomas E. Edison Tillamook William M. Dale, Jr. J.S. Bohannon Donald L. Kalberer John J. Murchison Charles S. Crookham 20. Washington Glen Hieber Harlow F. Lenon Albert R. Musick Pat Dooley Hollie M. Pihl Mercedes F. Deiz 21. Benton, Linn Richard Mengler 5. Clackamas P.K. Hammond Wendell H. Tompkins (Resigned 12-1-74) Courtney R. Johns Winston L. Bradshaw Frank D. Knight Howard J. Blanding Dale Jacobs Patrick D. Gilroy President - Circuit Judges Association - Clifford B. Olsen (to 11-8-74) (Apptd. 12-11-74) Val D. Sloper (from 11-8-74)

-4- -5- J ~-, ------~.--~- District Courts District Courts Cont.

1M &LG

County Name County Name

Benton Robert L. Gilliland William C. Beers Irving M. Steinbock Clackamas Charles A. Sams Shirley Field Robert M. Mulvey Philip T. Abraham • Philip M. Bagley Clatsop Harold T. Johnson Aaron Brown, Jr. (Died 6-24-74) Anthony L. Casciato George F. Cole Edmund A. Jordan {Apptd.8-15-74} William L. Richardson Richard L. Unis Columbia James A. Mason Polk Walter W. Foster Coos Charles H. Reeves Umatilla Richard J. Courson Curry Sam Hall Wasco Sam Van Vactor Deschutes Joseph J. Thalhofer (Resigned 8-31-74) James C. Donnell Douglas Gerald Kabler O. (Apptd.8-31-74) Carl M. Fel ker Washington Harold A. Lewis Hood River John F. Cushman Gregory E. Milnes

Jackson Lavaughn A. Merryman Yamhill Donald R. Blensly Ross G. Davis

Josephine L.A. Cushing President - District Judges Association - L.A. Cushing

Klamath Wayne H. Blair

Lane Frank R. Alderson William A. Beckett Winfred K. Liepe

Lincoln A.R. McMullen

Linn Carl G. Stanley

Marion Albin W. Norblad Thomas W. Hansen

Multnomah Robert W. Redding John F. Gantenbein

-6- -7- i J Discretionary original jurisdiction in mandamus, quo warranto and habeas corpus proceedings: SUPREME COURT \. Appellate jurisdiction in cases involving real pro­ ) perty, contracts, torts, appeals from the Tax Court, 7 Justices ( and in all appeals in which the Court of Appeals , does not have jurisdiction. PetltlOn .. ior ReVlew . >- I \ ( Exclusive appellate jurisdiction in criminal, post­ e ttl l \ COURT OF APPEALS , conviction and habeas corpus; probate; domestic ) relations, adoptions and juvenile matters; appeal Z " 6 Judges ( of cases where government agency is a party except from the Oregon Tax Court. n!

~

:r: (reVi! orders in -.....-en ..... U) u. contested cases) CI:» :.;:; ~ o = c:: Itl ~ / c..,:)= = j ~ c:.:J (0) = t') ...... "'CI ::.:: z .- CI:» "CI Cl / C1:i =c:..,:) .c:: ~ « ..... U) ® ::c TAX COURT CI RCUIT COURTS .- en c::..,:) >- ...l ~ General trial and limited appellate jurisdiction. ..r:::I I- "CI 0: 1 Judge 65 Judges* -V) = :::> ...... , ...... :r: o c:..,:) =c:: u C!:» .-..... "'CI f-o t) Appeals ...... , U) I V) -< 0: by new trial or by review of law .- -...... t}J~ ~ = ~ til c:.,:)= \ ., ...... ~ ~,!) Cl c:.:J @ ...l / .--C'a 0;::...... (review of orders in other Co.:» U) ::;: than contested cases) -= is / = ADMINISTRATIVE DISTRICT COURTS - ~ Limited jurisdiction trial courts and tribunals. STATE AGENCIES 40 Judges

I I I JUSTICE MUNICIPAL COUNTY ( 10 County Courts with judicial functions in COURTS COURTS COURTS )~ probate and/or Juvenile. (Justice, Municipal and County Court Judges are not members of the Judicial Conference).

*66 as of 1+75

N V .:r 0 0 o I o -8- -9- t,

Executive Committee OREGON JUDICIAL CONFERENCE Oregon Judicia! Conference Activities 1974 "" Df a WI ¥¥* ZX1 The Judicial Conference Of Oregon pursuant to The seven major proposals recommended by the o RS 1.840 subm its its annual report for 1974. Governor's Commission on Judicial Reform are "The Major effort of the Conference and of the indivi­ Prosecution Function," "Costs of Litigation," "Judi­ dual courts and judges during 1974 was to deal cial Retirement," "Selection, Tenure and Qual i­ effectively with the constantly growing number of fications of Judges" "State-wide Public Defender cases coming to the courts. It is increasingly difficult, System," "Procedural Rulemal

·,10·· -11- f·J·j,~ f',! 01* 1i~1 t"~'f>.· d'~ ">lfotiJf-{ JUfflY isnrt ".tJ!tn¢;t'/; rf1ii:Jtinq to design and tJtilization of efficient court judicial employee, giving broader power to presiding ment was adopted by the committee and forwarded t'A \,.; ",,':'j '.llldnll·~,CI' Itd!miJr'r'lhlp tu builciinr}5 and facilities in Oregon. judges and establishing dbtrict court judicial districts. to the Executive Committee of the Conference. 1:1': ,,?, "'" d~tl~! 1?d l f_'r~;<~':[fHA tJf d ttin~rnjl'/J!f)n on In October, Judges Fort, Rodman, Karaman and One subcommittee is concentrating on proposals for Discussion has been had regarding a detailed J'j! ~ 'r~!t ~d~,d1f,~H" Brownton attended the American Bar Association and statutory procedure changes which would be of examination of proposed legislation affecting the American Institute of Architects Conference in particular aid to the judiciary. judicial system and the committee's desire for such Chicaqo, on the subject of designing efficient court· Liaiso'" is being maintained between the judicial was forwarded to the Executive Committee. A study Work of the Standing Administration Committee of the Oregon State Bar of the small claims statute is being considered. rooml> and r:ourthouses. , ConnniUees of the Conference Thn committee proposed that Oregon establish a and with the Judicial Reform Commission, the latter with particular regard to state funding of the court JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMITtEE: Court Fac:i1ities Accreditation Commission and the The Judicial Conduct Committee was created in m tJ(.H HOtH< GOMMlflTT: proposal was submitted to the full Judicial Confer­ system. ! ';" I:hhi!, /l;l'lt, ',iJihlllIHi:'! lid'. d,·tf!fIlIlIWd to The committee has acted as agent cf the Judicial November 1973 to study and monitor Oregon's Code fmen in November and approved. Legislation was of Judicial Conduct and general problems of judicial j" ..i' ! b"'" ,IIII',!', fHI l,!!limidl hiN ,md pro(;pdure drafWd and submitted to the 1975 Legislature es" Conference in reviewing requests for new judicial .,!.! 1,'.lllf'!II"i d UlIlllldlilllP rlwk hoof·, Tlw twnc:il positions and has assisted the Executive Committee conduct and to maintain liaison with the Judicial tablishinfJ such a commission patterned after the New Fitness Commission, the Governor, and the Chief !".",j ',.';,I1{ I .. · dl",.)'!!wd ~IH' ,I fPddy n'ff'f(:n(;I~ to bf! Hampshire commission. in responding to legislative requests for recommen­ tl'.' I ,il, /in' lWlttl, d', IjUr:',tlnn'; (fIJ'JI~I()p iii criminal dations during the legislative session. Justice, regarding the standards of conduct and cri­ teria for selection of judges. The committee made a "'dll 1'1'>' "'·'j,JI'r. illf' d,·'.I, hoot· WIll follow ttl!,· CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE COMMITTEE: The committee made a request to the Oregon State brief report to the Oregon Judicial Conference in ,r' "lit ' ,I", It,,· tn-hIli f,€jl/I, hllf will tw d(]f)i~Jned The Ghairman of the committee reported that no Bar Judicial Administration Committee to introduce June 1974. The committee listed several areas of ~'" ,:,',,' I'~' I \;,jlhlwl'. It til\, Iwhl" wishl,,; hI do .jddi activities undertaken in 1974 were sufficiently com· legislation amending the statues relating to terms of interest it might pursue in the future. The committee Vi .• ,,,11 h', HH ,I Pd! fWt/!,H I!lHllt ph~te for 13 meaningful report. court so that judicial districts may set their own recommended that it should be continued and that it t jy I """'I~HHHI'!' hdd V'.,lthI1l'id tdkillq •. dfirmativ(! terms. ~LECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING COMMITTEE: evaluate the Canons of Judicial Ethics as adopted by ,). b.!; ". InH ti", ,lIllIptll1l1 !if the flt!W OnN)Cm The committee considered a wide variety of matters The Electronic Data Processing Committee has the Oregon S\.Jpreme Court.. ! ;1 ,a,'I;,!! hn'l,dUII' end!! .lIld tot puhllcation hy tht! been served by a multi-disciplinary membership of relating to judicial salaries and retirement. Three t"'"IH. 'i1dtl' ttl! '.If d LillltlllUilltJ Lrlj.ll Education judges, court administrative personnel and profes­ specific recommendations in this area were made to JUDICIAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE: ~" "I 'hI 10111111,,1 I,it,'\! ,jlld ,11';11 tlii' publication of tlw sionals in tile field of electronic data processing and . the entire Judicial Conference in June. The first, The Judicial Education Committee accomplished Ii".,,}. t 11("1 .. 11 ''''tlkl/L1l11l M,lIl1hll Illl JlIIitjt'S, Now that records managoment. The committee has kept abreast that the Judicial Conference recommend to the much in 1974. Assisting the State Court Administra· n (I' r if ~'.t h'II~·,!.ltH 'II hll'; /l1'I'1l W!,jctnd alld the publiGa of developments at the state and local levels that deal legislature that the retirement benefits for judges be tor in January and February the committee contri­ f''ln', It,i\;I' !Wililltl' 1I',iflty:, tlli' c(llllmittl!n will pro with electronic data processing for court records. increased to 50% and that the surviving spouse bene~ buted to the curriculum and practical benefit of the , , .'d ;,\Ith dl.dtlfl'! There has also been continuing communication be­ fits be increased to 25% of the final pay of judges at New Judge Orientation Course. A subcommittee was ! ,.,. 1:(lIl!II'IH!'I' h,!', imi'd .Ill I'liitor for tlw lwneh tween the State Judicial Information System project the time of retirement. The recommendation was designated to develop the academic portion of the 11,,",1 dhd II,L .h'\lI'hIIH'd d tllPlI" .Illltlllll' and weruited personnel and the committee members pertaining to adopted unanimously by the Conference. orientation program for 1975. .j~} 'b!U'I~ .I'll' dl',t:llt Ill/1ft Iwh/l'!I to df,:,ist in writing eornputerized court records. During the last quarter of Second, the committee moved that the Conference The committee was highly successful in the develop­ f!;,:' 1',"11.· 11", q'l.Ii ilt til!' n.lIlmllttl'l' I!; tl) lI.lve tH~neh 1974 the committee formulated a set of proposed adopt its recommendation that legislation be sub­ ment and execution of the Municipal Judge/Justice of t,'".!!·.·, ,lv,H!./!'!" h'l dl',tliliuttllll hv Nowmber 1975. ruies for consideration for enactment by the Oregon mitted to the 1975 Legislature to allow for a cost-of­ the Peace Education Conferenr.e in March. Formal Ci\lINUAHlI\Hi GOMMlrn:EE: Supreme Court under the authority of 0 RS 7.095. living increase for all judges who are retired after the evaluations and informal remarks attested to the effective date of the Act up to 3% a year and that the value of the conference. Another session is planned ~ II>' £,' 11"HitHIIHt (;IHlIIHIU,'!' llh't t':-..tt'nsive1v durinn JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE: judges who are contributing to the retirement fund for 1975. !!d' ",''cIt-. P.l.' ,md Hl!~i h~ j'II!JWP tlH' ~:ontinued During 1974 the committee had divided itself into increase their contribution from 7% to 8%. The The educational program of the Judicial Conference i,i.'W';'J ut ij ,I'll' lid; 1'-""1', dlld tilt' dl~;!H)&itl\1II of G.lSl'S, four subecommittees with specific areas of responsi­ Conference supported the recommendation that the in June was planned and arranged in its entirety by i'ut 1.".,\', It"", ,li't\\;\· II! In/it t hI! rOlllllHttm! continues bility. The committee has undertaken studies in several legislature grant a cost-of-living increase of 3% per the committee. The three subjects, "Judicial Con­ R,I Ilt'\!' till' tlMI nHUte< h. impkrmmt ttll~ modl)1 fields and has odopted specific recommendations of year to judges who retire after the effective date of duct," "What Trial Lawyers Don't Like About ~lI"I!H!!H. ,!Iii! wi! 101 HI mlt'~i h'l thL' \\lIl~ndal Ill!! and irnportance to the Conference. the Act. Judges," and "Courts and the Community/' were well l~m~';J\¥!!llii lit t ,IW:; In tilt' tu.!1 \~\iurt!;, ,IS dllli'l1lofmd hy An initial study has been made to determine how The committee recommended a specific salary received by all in attendance. ~'!t> l,mIHwHi'I' Hl!' I'dh'lld.llm,~ ful!''i wen' dlJsi!.lnt~d st,mdards or criteria can be developed in determining increase for all judges which initially was supported Following the judicial Conference the chairman h' """.,' nml h !I',l!ht .m m\t~VldtMI nI Ilhl5tl'f t' ~,r~ if~;t 1 !J~~?f~tUlh~ to q~jdht'1 all probate commissioners, legal assistants and other before they can be accomplished because of the :~. ~-: ~ ;~:\;~'!'~ r,~~f rf.;'~" vyn.,~ d ~.li~;;'HHttt:f:' !pJO,jf;.(k; tv-,il(); in 1!J14, onCH with the Ltlgislativt~ Interim CilfwmttlHJ on court officers working with probate. complex interrelationships of various code sections. '''~' il·; .. ~·' ;,·tr. ,J~~ ~~ •• :,t:tn, ;~$d~~);¢;q!~lt~t~Hft~1 r¥.1 V(JhlHt.~f~! JudiGiary, Subcc)mmittee on Adjudi· SGOPt! Judge Val Sloper and several of Oregon's newly Third, the historical pattern of episodic piecemeal r" ,"'t .. i ,,,' ".lil irj~;llIHI nj'll ,ltl,," Py,;llliJlfl!, catHm. Thf' of this meeting dealt with the lit'crimiflalizatifm <1I11f administrative adjudication of created probate commissioners made a presentation change by the legislature has failed to produce con­ f t I·flt.l r.. lIVJ f,OMlVH T I U traffiC offensns. on how the implementation of that program could be sistent improvement in our code of civil procedure or i' ,,:' i t:j/e i'i, I ,·~t,,'}i,Ih,J!' t ,qpdmtl,'!) nm~'ldt'fi:d Thp committee pwsented its report to the Oregon of assistance to an over-burdened court. Judge P.K. adaptation of the code to meet changing needs d' ~.~d,KI1'i" ~ j'H', 1\,11 ',lI I ill!I';! Cllllfhct of .Judicial Confmt':r1cf} in June 1974. It recommended Hammond explained the judge's role in probate because no one in the legislature is responsible for '!" ," H '''~'';\ .,t ,~!;,' I'!iddq! iiI/fill" r!;!' fflilt tile Confenmce 5upport the plan of the Legisla administration and conducted a comprehensive re­ the kind of meticulous staff study which is necessary ,l, "'~ HII' 1"'~lf,tihHi'. dwj 'fI.',Hi, Hu­ tl\m Committee on Judiciary to revise the Oregon view of the Judicial Conference's approved tickler to accomplish it. I n view of the pressure upon the e', f.,1 Hlf' ""'.i!I',qOI/Jl tlf IHopo'.ed Vduc\t) Code to reclassify most traffic offenses into system. Dean Eugene Scoles presided over a forum legislature to deal with major social, environmental ,"'.' ,\I,. 1',! i ,ILJw1111d1 Gonfl'rmH:1' tctlffic mfractions and to restrict the trial of traffic whose task was to answer questions arising under and economic problems, it is highly unlikely that the ,- ~L. ; '":-" "lnl!l,'l tIlt' l~H!1 ,;!~'/,ltm of tim IIlfmctions to court trials without u jury and with no the new guardianship code. Judge William McLennan 1975 Legislature or any other legislature will ever be f1uht to counsel at public expense. The committee offered a report on Oregon's recently enacted mental in a position to make studied, consistent evaluation J "Ii "(', l' ~ rl ',II !;'''/,Hm Hf HII' h'III';I.ltWH, furtlmr rcwmmendmj that the Conference support commitment procedure which was to be effective and improvement in the judicial code of civil prOGc, ~" -, "",H.,-' I!,,;:!,!,.'.,,,! tht· l.11!1iIIl".~.llf fiB 3304 imd tll!~ (,oncppt of sa 403 which would provide for July 1st. Walter Pendergrass, the chairman of the dure, . ,q '1/U ~t ., ""',tin, t ','~ .nf"fl".'! hi!!'" flom tlw lmw of {Jireet apPtMls from the district courts to the Court Bar's committee, assisted the group in ascertaining Fourth, it is desirable to provide a continuous •., . '.~i,i, h' 1~!I: Iltmrmttpt' hptUIn'.lS of l\ppl!.;;~ ~h' "':~;I "," (',,'.iHf'!t'·rh Hi .hUlI' 1014tlw pleadings, handling of dockets and court sity of procedural change. The committee believes , "I', ~.'l.,. \' "';1~t '* g" .' If!h~H:I' it'. IlI.!'fllhvt' Com SuprtHnH Court. documents; form of processl notices; con­ that the Supreme Court is not the only agency which ",,'~'iH' f". "~""""'~ " k'i".l.ltil,;;.' h'!lI~'''ll'i't,jtIvt'h)t tht' PROBATE LAW AND PROCEDURE COMMITTEE: flicts and legislation regarding procedures. can perform that function and that the Legislative i "'''~I .;! ~~w l~'L;H\ \".",',:<11<1 ,t1 till' BI'ill'i\,JtUfl'. At One of tlm primary charges of this committee has Maintain direct and close liaison with the Assembly should not be wholly deprived of any part .·e··if ~!l!~:~·~q:il:J '1H r;!H'~r.l'~;J~h~'~ p.~d\\';t~b;l·f., tht~ (~t)ntprt'fH~~~ henn to (ipvelop (lfficient methods of handling probate Oregon State Bar Committee on Procedure in this process. Likewise l the committee does not -",', .Ut ,,~,a H'.lf ,Ii hi'!! ,i!d \>.Itnl 1.\ ,1,,~th\.HI"t~ ttw (~tlses hy the judges end thoir staffs. 1n pursu ing th is and Practice. " believe that the Oregon Procedural System in use for f "I ',,~;,\i" ,w·t tY'l!'·!,lt,ltl' e~,ainlitU't'$ In t£isk the committee endeavors to maintain a direct Under this mandate the committee was directed to 115 years need be abandoned. Evolutionary modifi· h,UStlO with thtl Oregon State Sat Committee on Pro· examine exhaustively the state's procedural rules and cation in an orderly way is preferable to substitu­ (~ ",:\t-, ~ I'! ~e"" "";"idi,\~!',1 nllmhblh'i':i ''''';,is Uwn iMte Law ilnd ProcedurH. The 1973 annual report of statutes to determine whether, and if so, in what tion of a totally new procedural system, but in the A 1. '."!'i~ 01' ,:,.l+'o;,,'i,',i',l'l> ~hlf tq ,'nji.H~' '.iuth II that (:ornmittm~ indicated a strong concern regarding respect, they are deficient in meeting the needs of committee's judgment, in the absence of a rnechanism ~" JU'"." ',,;'k",.· ;tlfl\-\' ~o,.fi\\;,!, till' t"OH'U~hnl'!' tht' ~Hqll pt~r(:NHa~lt~ of decl"dents' estates pending the courts, the bar and the litigants. The committee for orderly change, the frustrations of legislators, "'~"~ 't'j~',+~' 'l ,1: ~·; ..ii:~ti ~,r;'~;)~~:~tt'0t t~~~ JHll';rfaj! ~:;.,·JttLtf·C; dhhi UVN' thn~e Yt~Jr$. The On>qon State Bar acknowledHed was asked to propose changes which appear to be lawyers, judges, litigants, and the public, are likely to r.~; ft.., l' .7e !';\,'~\1>~,dt" t.~n~f '.oJ thJt thi' fld,!\' m tht' handlin\l of probate matters was desirable, and to consider whether in order to accom­ result in the substitution of a totally new system. 'I.'lt\HIV ontl of tl~l~ laY' puhlic's m,tl0r annoyances with plish these purposes procedural rule-making powers For the reasons set forth above, the committee has UH~ jmht:I,!1 svstE!IU. The Chif~r Justice requested that should by statute be vested in some body other than concluded that the responsibility for civil procedufnl th~\ (:.ml l1l1th'i' t,lkt'! ,) It~Jdinq roh1 in Investigating the the legislature. change should be vested by statute in (l Council on

··15", ----~-- -.---.-----. ------

GivIl Prm;r.(jum. Bmmd on the findings, the committee active since 1972 and presented its second annual preparation of the transcript upon service with a The committee reviewed the present method of dfiJf11:d iJ bill for the creation of a Council on Civil report to the Oregon Judicial Conference in June copy of the notice of appeal and to file and serve gathering statistics .trom the circuit and district PWGIHJure. The committee submitted its initial reo 1974. The committee's report dealt with statutory the transcript upon completion as required by ORS courts and concluded that there was a need for more port and pmpwmd bill to the Oregon Judicial Con­ problems in the retention of court reporters' notes 19.078. detailed information to be collected from the courts. 'fl:rencn in Juno of 1974. The committee recommended and exhibits in courts of records. The committee next reported on a voice-writing The committee developed a list of proposed data that tlw Conference approve the bill to create a The problem arose because of an apparent conflict demonstration done over the past y~ar. The demon­ elements to be collected from the circuit courts; Counc~iI on Civil Procedure; that the Conference allow between 0 RS 7.120 which allows destruction of stration was sponsored by the National Center for these data elements were presented. to the Oregon tim committee to complete the second phase of its notes, tapes, or audio records or exhibits introduced State Courts. This experiment was conducted partially Judicial Conference in June' 1972 but the Conference work, the dotuilcd discussion of specific areas of pro­ after a period of ten years, and ORS 8.340 (4) which at the Judicial Conference in June 1973 and subse­ took no action on the proposea data elements at c:miuro that need attention; and that the committee requires permanent retention of the notes, tapes or quently in the district courts in Multnomah, Lane and that time. lH! i'lllthorizf!CJ to continue its work for the purpose of audio records. Washington counties. Discussing the matters with The following year the main focus of the commit­ assistinCj in the presentation of the bill to the 1975 After discussion of the matter the committee was the judges and reviewing the report of the National tee was to continue the study of the appropriate Luqi:,iature. The Conference voted unanimous approval of the opinion that the permanent requirement of Center, it was the opinion of the committee that data elements for statistical purposes of the circuit of the committee's report and recommendations. o RS 8.340 be deleted and that 0 RS 7.120 be amend­ voice-writing was a possible alternative to other means and district courts. The committee modified its list PUBLIC RELATIONS COMMITTEE: ed reducing the permissive time of destruction to of reporting and might be considered at such time as of proposed data elements for the circuit courts that Tlw cornrnittee Wi'JS expanded during 1974 to five years but making permanent retention mandatory the district courts become courts of record and re­ had been presented to the Conference in 1972. The include Helen Hiordan of the Public Service and in water rights cases, requiring retention of cases quire verbatim transcripts. The data was not com­ committee developed a similar list of data elements Inforrm.ltion Committee of the Oregon State Bar. involving criminal convictions until the death of the plete as to cost and the committee takes no position for the district courts. The committee recommended Tlwm were no official meetings of the entire com­ defendant or 40 years from the time of trial which­ in that area merely indicating appropriately accurate that the Oregon Judicial Conference forward the pro­ rnitwo but the chairman did meet with Mrs. Riordan ever occurred 'first, and requiring retention of cases transcripts can be prepared using the voice-writing posed data elements for the circuit and district courts in an attempt to establish specific goals for the com­ involving custody of juveniles until the children reach system. to the to be used as resource In 1971 amendments to the appeals statutes in mittlm and methods for accomplishing the same. the age of 18 years or are married. The committee re­ documents by the Court, by the State Judicial In­ commended legislation be introduced to amend ORS chapter 19, specifically ORS 19.078, shifted the Tim State Court Admir1istrator's office is proceeding formation Systems Project and by any other interested 7.120 and 8.340 (4) to reflect these suggested changes. burden of certain acts from the attorneys to the court with the project of establishing a full-time public agency. The committee presented the proposed data The committee next reported on the situation of reporters. This required that the reporters, in addi­ information officer who would be involved with public elements and its recommendations to the Conference court reporters becoming overloaded with a backlog tion to certification of the transcript which was information and relations on a statewide basis. It is in June 1974 and the report of the committee was of orders for transcripts for appealed cases. There was already their duty, were also required to do the thuunht that in the future this committee might pro­ amended to remove a recommendation of monthly discussion of the use of state funds for pro tems in filing, give the notice in writing to the parties that the ceml in tho following aretlS: reporting in favor of quarterly statistical reporting. such situations but based upon the report of Dave transcript had been filed, and serve the respondent The report of the committee then as amended was 1. Work more dosely with the Oregon State Ohmart, Oregon Shorthand Reporters Association with the copy of the transcript and provide notice of adopted by the Conference. Bar Committee on Public Service and Infor­ representative, it was felt that this no longer is a pro­ such service to the clerk. For a period of time report­ Since the June Conference several of the members mation. blem and that in those few instances when some sup­ ers have been making a charge for thls but had agreed of the committee have been appointed to the advisory 2. Establish j] format for use by the courts of' port was needed, counties had indicated the willing­ that in the absence of statutory ·authority and espe­ committee of the State Judicial Information System e.1ch judicial district in developing projects ness to provide it. Therefore, it was not recommended cially in indigent criminal matters this might not be Project. The advisory committee is directly con­ wcll as the student visitor programs, volun­ by the committee that any state support be requested. appropriate inasmuch as no provision is made for cerned with the same general areas of concern that fell teer community service programs as sentencing The committee briefly reported on the problem of taxing such a service fee as cost. The committee within the jurisdiction of the Statistics Committee. alternative?s, and public information brochures court reporters leaving the jurisdiction of the court considered the matter and was of the opinion that a to assist the public in dealing with the courts without completing all requested transcripts. The service fee was appropriate and should be provided by UNI FORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS COMMITTEE: in such matters as pretrial release, communi· committee expressed the opinion that the increase in appropriate legislation, specifically an amendment to The uniform Jury Instructions Committee is con­ cation with defendants held in custody, small the page rate which reporters were allowed to charge ORS 21.070. The committee took no position relative tinuing its work on the instructions under the new claims, minor traffic, am/so forth, for transcripts had done much to alleviate this pro­ to the amount of such fee feeling that reporters criminal code. These matters are being submitted to ~,. Involve the Oregon Judicial Conference in blem. The committee went on to suggest that in the should justify the charge to any appropriate legisla­ the bar for approval and pUblication but the commit­ public service presentMiol1s on court matters event a court reporter leaves the court that any pay tive body. tee has no control over the ultimate date of approval of public inten.~st such as pre-trial release; the and publication by the bar. be withheld until all ordered transcripts have been STATISTICS COMMITTEE: system fOf Gourt';lppointed counsel, sentene­ prepared. inti. and the probation system. The Statistics Committee was created in June 1972 REPORT OF THE CIRCUIT JUDGES The committee recommended that the appellate to advise the Executive Committee of the Oregon ASSOCIATION: REPORTING AND RECORDS COMMITTEE: courts and the circuit courts should adopt a proposed Judicial Conference on the gathering, publishing and The Circuit Judges Association met for two days tim Rcportinn ami Rllcords Committee has been uniform rule requiring the court reporter to begin analyzing of statistics from the courts of the state. immediately following adjournment of the November

-17- - .-----.. ------._------

mt,wting of the Judicial Conference. Lectures were Jean Lewis. This latter committee is in its second year The conferences are informal and usually last about needs and to point the way to finding improved givon by Judges William Dale, John Jelderks and of operation and is proving its efficiency in resolving three hours. Needs and frustrations of the trial courts answers. Donald Kalberer on Writs of Prohibition and other problem areas between agencies, and it is hoped that are discussed, "beefs" and challenges are expressed, The Judicial Conference committees held many extraordinary remedies. Mr. John W. Darby discussed the committee will continue in its constructive work. ideas created, and a few questions answered. Each working sessions throughout the year, and much was recurring problems in administering paroles, and The Juvenile Court Commission Committee pre­ meeting is unique, but from each has come the same accomplished. Legislative proposals are being made Assisttlnt Attorney General W. Michael Gillette re­ pared a bill for submission to the 1975 Legislature pattern of dilemmas, concerns and difficulties. Solu­ by the Conference and the Conference has studied viowcd the various elements that form the basis of that would establish a state-wide Juvenile Court tions to problems are not easily found, but these legislation proposed by others and in ~everal instances the Attorney General's decision whether or not to Commission. The commission's job would range over meetings have done much to crystalize the greatest taken specific action in 'support or opposition. appeal a case. Judge Val Sloper was elected president a wide spectrum of responsibil ities includi ng educa­ for the ensuing year. The next meeting of the associa­ tion, court rules, budgetary and fiscal matters, inter tion is scheduled for November 6-7, 1975. alia. REPORT OF THE DISTRICT JUDGES ASSOCIATION: Courts Generally During 1974 the District Judges Association chan· nelmf its efforts into four basic areas. Judge Gilliland's No new judicial positions were created in 1974, Committee on Legislation has been busy especially although a new circuit court judgeship created by the with the activities in matters of court structure and 1973 Legislature will become effective in January tho proposed changes in the traffic code. 1975. During the year two circuit court judges and Judno Unis has been involved with education and one district court judge retired, and one district in addition to facilitating attendance at the many court judge, Harold T. Johnson, died. oducation rosourcesfor a good number of district Although the time lapse in disposition of cases judues, the highlight of the year was arranging for continues to improve in some areas, ground is being Judoo Irving Younger of New Yorl< to be with the lost in others. I n an attempt to keep dockets of all district judgos at their annual meeting in November. courts as current as possible there were many tem­ Judne rostor has visited almost all of the district porary assignments of judges to districts other than their own. Circuit court judges gave 531.5 days of courts in tho state personally in an effort ultimately to oncourago uniformity in the operation of the help to other circuit courts, and district court judges district courts; his cfforts will hopefully result in a gave 69.5 days of assistance to circuit cOllrts. A total of 151 senior judges and attorneys gave 567.5 days of savinu of time ond money ns well as promoting more help as judges pro tempore to the circuit courts and uniform treatment of offenders. 2395 days to the district courts during 1974. This HealLzing the need for better image of the judges in program enabled all courts to remain open for the tho oyo of the public, Judge Redding has headed a business of trying cases at full strength all twelve CommiW1o on Public Relations. This is felt by the months of the year. Thus the docket backlog has Gommittoo to be an important area and one that has been kept at a minimum, but is gradually increasing. hetm somewhat overlooked in past years. The judges are constantly striving to improve court Tho District Judges Association will hold its administration, docket control, the current status of orflcinl annual moeting in April 1975 in conjunction all cases and use of time, but in addition to more with tho annuol Judicial Conference meeting. New efficiency, more manpower is required. affiours of tho {Issocintion will be elected at that time. The program of the Chief Justice of the Supreme REPORT OF THE JUVENILE JUDGES Court, the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals and ASSOCIATION: the State Court Administrator meeting with the pre­ Tho Association hus divided into three standing siding judges of the trial courts, three or four at a committees: tho Oregon Juvenile Court Commission time, was continued throughout 1974. Meetings have Committee chaired by ,Judge Edward Leavy; the been held during the past two years with the pre­ Troininn nml Research Committee chaired by Judge siding judges of all of the circuit courts and most of Hollio Pihl; und 0 Children's Services Division Juvenile the district courts. Meetings with the remaining dis­ Court Jud!}os Liaison Committeo chaired by Judge trict courts are scheduled for the first half of 1975.

-18- -19-

, , The Courts of Oregon

i IIbl ,•••• " ••111.' •• ' W dbA.ltAU I Il1«irJrMtU___ ililiilll. __liliiii1111 ., ______iiwa ___ _

ft,,, (lIl:'.!)tl C1m'Altutltm ill.J1tWfUW; iJ Supreme court for retrial or examination of the record. Appeals hear an appeal from the court of Appeals (Petition County with 18 judges. The least busy is Lake COllnty t;~/lHt ,'Iiit! " .... ndl t1titl:f CWlrt') ;)') mil¥ from time f() may be taken from final orders in circuit court and for Review). If a question arises as to which court with one judge, That judge serves ext;nsively in t!H!!' id' Ul~,!l/'ll hy fi!'lJ .. Tim t)wjlflill Article VII of in some cases from administrative agencies to the shall hear an appeal, the Supreme Court shall sum­ other districts. Circuit courts have unlimited mone­ 1ti" (;tl1i',htlAtHlli ;d',u rHtwldH~ for circuit courts, Court of Appeals or Supreme Court. Generally, marily determine whether it or the Court of Appeals tary jurisdiction in civil matters and hears both law ./ IIHhfy UHHh, 11I',t;t,J! Iff tlw lWaGf! and nlUnicipal actions at law can be appealed to the Court of Appeals shall hear the case. and equity cases. Felony cases are tried only in I,IIIIU', i tW',I! flflJ'Jlsioll'J now huvll the ;;tatus of or the Supreme Court only on questions of law, such Oregon law confers on the Supreme Court general circuit courts, although arraignments and preliminary ',ttlruh:'; 1;1:1.;;11',1> /if tIl!! .milGtnllJrt1 of Arrwnded as an alleged erroneous ruling by the trial judge. In administrative authority and supervision over the hearings in felony cases are conducted in lower courts, f-\.ttl! Ii- VII III!!,,· C;11II~;tltuWm!H1 Nl}vnmbnr B, 1910. equity cases the appellate court can make different courts of the state. It may make rules and orders in Since July 1, 1970, circuit'judges have had probate I h· I HI mt unlit I~, "I",ted wltli t!ll Jlldit:ial power, findings of fact from the record. Criminal convictions aid of this power, but cannot make rules of proce· jurisdiction in all but six counties "and juvenile juris· ,mthulI11 ,jwi JIIH',drc,tItHl not $pec:iftr:al/y veGted in may be appealed by the defendant and certain rulings dure, The Court's administrative and supervisory diction in all but eight counties. Circuit judges are ,tWiHwt lnhllildl ll'qit,idtlvt, ilGtion lHis defined !tw in criminal cases may be appealed by the prosecution functions are exercised for the Court by the Chief frequently assigned to other judicial districts by the 'i"i"irdf~ltll .-II. 11\1'11 ,md Crtml/Ilil JlJriflt\i<:tion of all on limited grounds. Trial court decisions may be Justice through the State Court Administrator. Supreme Court. The Multnomah and Marion county tnll I qW ~I, 1»1 thl' 'ilillL' f.Y"tI'ITl, MuniGip,JI Gourts ilre affirmed, reversed, or modified and the cause can be districts have separate domestic relations departments, H 1'.ltI .. j bv IlIIdl dhltti·!tJ, bllt ~;ubJt!(:t to h:qi5lative THE COURT OF APPEALS: remanded for new trial in the lower court. and Multnomah County has a separate probate de· ,t" "I, IV!", The Constitution directs that all state judges be The Court of Appeals with six judges is the second highest court in the state. It has exclusive jurisdiction partment. Proceedings in the circuit court an~ reported tIll! hl',/ IHtHfi!h"i fII I 1'1; by which socimy !wverns olected to serve for six year terms and that judges over cases appealed from the circuit court in criminal, by court reporters who prepare written transcripts of .I'.t'!l III L'Vtl llll'''~' ttl!~ wtth!Hl(~l1t (rf dISputes he shall retire at the end of the calendar year in which PO!Jt-conviction, habeas corpus and extradition mat­ trials for appellate purposes. t'~JI'I 'II 11'1/1'11', tlwl llll! PW!;Ccutiorl of 0 ffcnses they reach 75 years of age. The legislature is em­ d'I-lItI'•• tiJ" pnhl,,; 1 til! or Iljln~; of our IllW in both thH powered by the Constitution to establish a lower ters; probate; domestic relations; adoptions and DISTR ICT COU RTS: lHil1 ,Il,d tI:!' I.tmlllltli IdW am found in trw English retirement age not under 70 years. Incompetency, juvenile matters; appeals from government agencies The district courts, with 40 judges, have jurisdic­ ,11,01 AIW·fll.lIl i "'llIlllHl lillN, eonsistinl) of the stream corruption, malfeasance or delinquency in office are (excluding cases tried in the Tax Court). A case tion limited to $2,500 in civil cases and to misdemea" heard in the Court of Appeals may be reviewed by "f ! Illiff d,n·;nH1'. d!!fllllnq tim ri'lilts .md dudes of grolH){is 'for removal. I nvoluntary retirement of jud· nor (including all traffic) criminal jurisdiction over lhdrvtlhhll~, III 1111'11 1I~I,lt\t)nf;fllps with others unci with ges for physical or mental incapacity may be accom­ the Supreme Court upon petition. ORS 2.520. crimes punishable by fines up to $3,000 and imprison­ Hw t,nwtl~ill!l. Alonqr,ldl! Hw; hody of common law plished by a proceeding before a special commission, THE OREGON TAX COURT: ment of one year or less. In addition, the district fM'. I"Jilhll'!'nt.'IIII' 1'\ !tl',tHl dhH!Wli with ,} crime nHlY, prior original jurisdiction in mandamus, quo warranto and and will increase district court jurisdiction in civil habeas corpus, It has exclusive appellate jurisdiction in The circuit courts are the state trial courts of cases to $3,000. hi hMP.. I'ltlWf 1m f Plt'.i~t'd un hIS "wvn fi~cl.)nnilimCt~ or general jurisdiction. Iwld lH'whflil tlw p\)stUl~l \\f S~~('UI itv to his cases it;volving real property t contracts, torts, appe~ls lmsure The 66 (as of JanuClry 1, 1975) circuit judges in THE JUSTICE COURTS: ,ipPt',U,mt 1'. from the Tax Court, and all other appeals from clr· cuit courts except those in which the Court of Appeals Oregon are deployed in 20 judicial districts. Several The justice of the peace, remnant of territorial Apl1t',th; m,ty *~lwl.llIv hi' In.ldt' hom dc~isions of are multi-state districts and 10 districts embrace days when each precinct of the state was entitled "U hl\\!'l tu;il (tUH t~i ,md tnhW\,lls ti) th~ (~irC:\lIt has jurisdiction. The Supreme Court may elect to \ multiple counties. The busiest district is Multnomah to a "JP" court, presides over a court with limited

-21- Judicial Conference of the State of Oregon Committees

civil ($1,000), small claims ($500) and criminal STATE-COURT ADMINISTRATOR: EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: CALE;NDARING COMMITTEE: (traffic, some misdemeanors and magistrate) jurisdic­ Executive Secretary to thel Oregon Judicial Confer­ tion. .Justice courts, like district courts, may not ence: Kenneth J. O'Connell, Chairman Don H. Sanders, Chairman try the titl!} to real property. The State Court Administrator is responsible to Jw)'tice courts presently exist in 48 communities the two appellate courts for processing cases on Edward H. Howell Henry M. Kaye in Orefjon. County commissioners have the power to appeal, publishing decisions, administering records, Virgil Langtry John C. Warden (!stublish justice court district boundaries. Only a dockets, facilities, personnel and fiscal matters, and J.S. Bohannon William C. Beers vory few of the justices of the peace of the state are other aspects of appellate court administration. The Edward Leavy lawynrs . .Ju5ticos of the peace are not members of administrator also assists the Supreme Court in Don H. Sanders Non-Conference Members: thH .Judicial Confenmce. connection with the bar examinations and admission Harold A. Lewis Naomi Butler MUNICIPAL COURTS: of new attorneys, maintains the Supreme Court ros­ William A Beckett Michael Hall Each city in Oregon, except Portland, has a muni­ ter of attorneys, assists in disciplinary matters and Douglas Bray, Staff cipal court, authorized under the home rule charter performs other liaison with the Board of Governors Val D. Sloper - liaison - Circuit Judges Assn. of the municipality but controlled in some procedural and the bar committee. L.A. Cushing - liaison - District Judges Assn. Another and separate role of the State Court Donald L. Kalberer - liaison - Juvenile Judges Assn. Study methods, ideas and suggestions for improving court aspllc;ts by state law. calendaring to better fill and control dOl:kets and ilvoid The proc:edurfJ and formality of these courts Administrator is as assistant to the Chief Justice and scheduling conflicts. Suggest court rules that might ViU ins !}wl1tly. Many small cities combine the functions the Supreme Court in supervision of the state court Loren D. Hicks, State Court Administrator improve the flow of court business. Encourage the adop­ of municipal court judge with those of recorder, system in Oregon. This part of the administrator's Secretary tion of modern, proven docket control techniques. Advise treasurer or other official, in one person. Few munici­ job is primarily a servic9 to the trial courts and trial individual courts as to possible specific improvements in judges. Pursuant to instm~tions from the Chief Responsible for overall policy, direction, coordination of their calendaring system. Create model form and documents pal judgus are el(Jcted. Most are appointed by the for use in the several courts. Justice he arranges for the a~isignment of trial judges work, committee appointments, review of committee work, common council. Only a relative few have legal back­ liaison with Board of Governors, advisory to Chief Justice, qroumls. to other jurisdictions and for the appointment of pro planning, implementation of adopted policies, annual The primary function of municipal courts is to tempore judges as needed. He manages the statis­ meeting. hear ilnd dm:ido cases involving city ordinance viola­ tical reporting system for all courts in the state, COURT FACILITIES COMMITTEE: tions, whid\ are variously classed as criminal or civil represents the courts on numerous boards and com­ mittees at both the state and national level. William S. Fort, Chairman matters, and carry minor penalties. Salaries and duties BENCH BOOK COMMITTEE: of municipal judf}os are determined by the munici­ Another major responsibility is serving as Execu­ tive Secretary to the Oregon Judicial Conference. J.R. Campbell pality. Citins !.lro rcquirod by a recent state law to John A Jelderks, Chairman snit:ct juries according to circuit court procedure. I n such position the State Court Administrator is Joseph B. Felton responsible for the planning

-23------.------

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE COMMITTEE: JUDICIAL ADMINISTRATION COMMITTEE: JUDICIAL EDUCATION COMMITTEE: LEGISLATIVE COMMITTEE: Donald R. Blcnsly, Chairman Jena V. Schlegel, Chairman Richard L. Unis, Chairman Thomas H. Tongue, Chairman Herbert M. Schwab Dean Bryson William C. Beers William McAllister Law School Edwin E. Allen Herbert M. Schwab Non-Conference Edward Howell Aaron Brown, Jr. Robert E. Jones Representatives: Duane R. Ertsgaard Robert Foley George F. Cole John C. Beatty, Jr. Member: Loren L. Sawyer Dean Fred Fagg, III Alan F. Davis Carl H. Francis Courtney R. Johns \ Samuel M. Bowe Sam Hall Alfred T. Sulmonetti (Northwestern) Franl" D. Knight John M. Copenhaver Mercedes Deiz George Van Hoomissen Asst. Dean Fred Merrill Berkeley Lent Pat Dooley Jean L. Lewis Edmund Jordan (U. of 0.) Anthony L. Casciato Roland K. Rodman Richard M. Mengler Loren Hicks Prof. Ross Runkel L.A. Cushing George F. Cole Hollie M. Pihl Willamette Rolwrt M. Mulvey Gregory E. Milnes Val D. Sloper Albin W. Norblad Oregon State Bar Richard L. Unis David Gernant, Staff Charles Gleason, Staff Representative: David Gernant, Staff Kay Stallings Loren Hicks, Staff Continuous study and reports on criminal substantive Charles Gleason, Staff procedumllawanef the practice of criminal law, including Study in the field of court administration and management, hillmas (;orpus, post convi(~tion, and prison discipline. including renumeration and retirement benefits for court Charles Gleason, Staff David Gernant, Staff Recommend Chilllf/es. Maintain liaisut! with Oregon personnel, overall budgeting, new judgeships and new State Bilr Committf1e on Criminal Law and Procedure. courts, personnel system for courts, organization of courts Act as planning, coordinating and operating agency for Maintain liaison with the Oregon Legislature. Plan and and tlIe court system, function of the office of the programs of judicial education for Oregon judges and coordinate presentations on legislative proposals sup­ presiding judge, special problems such as court reporters, court personnel including the educational portions of ported and opposed by the Judicial Conference. Follow ELECTRONIC DATA PROCESSING COMMITTEE: county commissioners, use of para judicial help, study of the annual meeting of the Judicial Conference, the course of legislation of interest to the courts. Advise court administration in other states. Maintain liaison annual Judges Orientation Course, special training pro­ other committees relative to legislation in their field with Oregon State Bar Committee on Judicial Adminis­ grams for circuit and district court judges, JP's and of interest. Maintain liaison with the Oregon State Bar William A. Beckett, Chairman tration. municipal judges, court support personnel, etc. relative to its legislative program and with its Com­ Establish policies and priorities for selection of mittee on Law Revision, develop a unified approach to ,James R. Ellis judges and others to attend out of state seminars and legislative matters. colleges. Maintain liaison with the many national Mitchell Karaman JUDICIAL CONDUCT COMMITTEE: judicial education and training programs, with the Oregon State Bar CLE Program, and with the Oregon Non-Conference Members: F. Gordon Cottrell, Chairman colleges of law. Don Norman Gerald C. Schmitz Ralph M. Holman Lloyd Smith Harlow F. Lenon H;Jfold Hart John J. Murchison Bruco Dalros L. Orth Sisemore Ed Mor~lan Shirley Field Robert L. Gilliland Douolns Broy, Staff Joseph J. Thalhofer Ruy Moyhugh, Staff Loren Hicks, Staff Study tlw apJllli:ation of eloctronic data processing to t;ouft records and to monitor standards for llse of Study and monitor Oregon's Code of Judicial Conduct, elt~ct(()ni(; ttata processing Ii) courts. Also to monitor the advising individual judges on possible conflicts of interests. mJny studies being conducted on llse of computers in Advise the bench on practices that cause conflicts and those tlIt' field of I,HV Jmi in the courts and interpret them to that avoid them. Maintain fiaison with the Judicial tile Confl'ftY1CfJ. Fitness Commission, ABA Committee on Judicial Conduct, and Governor's office and Chief Justice re criteria for judicial selection.

-25- .. ..., ;t - MINOB (;OURTS C()MMITTr£E~ PROCEDURE and PRACTICE COMMITTEE: REPORTING and RECORDS COMMITTEE: STATISTICS COMMITTEE:

Ph,IIIJT Abraham, Chuirman John C. Beatty, Jr. Chairman Jeff D. Dorroh, Chairman Roland V. Rodman, Chairman

H(~r hilt t M. Schwab Arno Denecke Virgil Langtry Winston L. Bradshaw W;l"'/fW H. Blwr Jacob Tanzer James R. Main Richard J. Burke John f;, Gw.hm<.lfl William M. Dale, Jr, Lyle R. Wolff Eugene K. Richardson Ho'i'; n. Dilvi~; Douglas R. Spencer Frank R. Alderson Walter W. Foster ,John r, Gutlff!nbl!1Il Winfred K. Liepe Carl M. Felker Carl G. Stanley (iNill(j 0, K;lbll'l Robert W. Redding Harold A. Lewis .liIIW~'i A Mjj~;()tl Charles H. Reeves Non-Conference Members: Attorney Advisors to Committee: Michael Hall William V. Deatherage and David Templeton Oregon Shorthand Reporters Association John R. Peterson (Oregon State Bar) Representative: Daniel E. Wood '''wh' ,tilt! iIIII/IM' WI PIII/1ll'11I5 of q)(~t t.J1 mterest to tbe Burl Green and Lawrence Dean (American Trial Dave Ohmart IlI/tIllt Hllff IS 01 tl1(' staw, rSjlN:iillly the justico of tlw Lawyers Assn.) Douglas Bray, Staff 1'/'.11 l! i mil (',,"ul MlIl1iupa! (.'ollrts, lind to iJ lessor ex ti'nt. Thomas Cooney and Owen Panner (Oregon Assn. Adell Johnson, Staff {It'dtift ./l1l1 ClltJilt}' COllfts ·'akl! rccommondatiof)s Study the reporting and publication of judicial statistics tuw.mIIJlIll.tftl1l/ If-,' mlllor ( Ilrts more into tlw state of Defense Counsel) from all courts. Advise on efficiency and value of the 'J)l!,U'11/ tIl ((llIfts, M.1111(.1II1 (lose liaison with the minor Study and make recommendations relative to hiring, supervision, remuneration and responsibilities of court statistics and on need for changes to the system. Main­ I ! g ,111" WI (/1 til{' Om!lml Ar.soci.) tion of justices of tlU! David Gernantt Staff iii' tain liaison with the many agencies and groups in the field 1'/',11/1, I illlf(', !>/liI(liv/str}o (If tl10 Le.lgtJl! of Omgoll Cities, reporters. Also study systems and innovations in t;outt of judicial statistics, analyze and report on the facts and tli,' Mil/PI COllrt Ualt's Cllmnl1(fel~ IIlIi/llational tnli10r reporting and preparation of transcripts. Examine and Study and make recommendations concerning court give advice on particular problems in court reporting. trends revealed by Oregon court statistic$. f !111ft IllrpnUiI(IIIIJS !)lId} ,15 tIlt! AnWflCilll ACildemy ilml procedure and practice, form of pleadings, handling of till' Ndiltlll.ll Conll'U'WI! IIf S/u't,'iilf Cmlft judges, Also, study and make recommendations relative to storage dockets, court documents, notices, and legislation re such and ultimate destruction of court reporters notes procedures. Maintain liaison with Oregon State Bar and other court records. Maintain liaison with the Oregon Committee on Procedure and Practice. Shorthand Reporters Association. PHOHATE LAW und PHOCEPURE COMMITTEE: UNI FORM JURY INSTRUCTIONS COMMITTEE: PUBLIC RELATIONS COMMITTEE: Charles S. Crookham Chairman " f .Ui, Hull.lIl1lo11 Robert W. Redding, Chairman t "lHlIa~i [:, r: d ('1nll Glen Hieber P,I<, Hdmmtmd Dale Jacl)bs Henry M. Kaye Willlillll ~, Md PHlhlll Carlisle Roberts Edward Leavy Allll'tt H. MII',ld; Philip M. Bagley Clifford B. Olsen nnW1I,I!; Ft Hpmwl'f Thomas W. Hansen Wendell H. Tompkins .fulln G Wtlfdt:1l Lavaughn A. Merryman Charles S. Woodrich WIIII,lIn W, Wl'lhi Charles A. Sams William A. Beckett 0.1f wit " Will hlltl$ William L. Richardson Non-Conference Member: Helen Riordan Study and draft uniform jury instructions for civil and criminal trials. Maintain liaison with Oregon State Bar Committee on Uniform Jury Instructions. ~:t'i!.'';\ ,;mf m;liH' mn}mml'm!,/t'llilS nmn'rning Ort'gnn's Adell Johnson, Staff \ ",,},,~t(~ H'dl' ,md Jlhlhllt' ;;V,ll'i;'I'.' dC:ll'I,m

-27-

'in By-Laws of the Judicial Conference ORSStatutes Creating of the State of Oregon Judicial Conference of the State of Oregon As Amended June 12,1970

ILl! i"ira ,F, IIVut1lU .,•. no ," . II !UUII btl J i Ill'" r R £

1. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Chief Justice for the unexpired term. The Chief Justice shall consult with the Supreme Court or with the reo a. There shall be a standing committee of the Judicial maining Court of Appeals, Circuit Court or District Conference cailcd the Executive Committee. Said Com· Court members; as may be appropriate. 1 f.~HJ ·jWlif.i.;1 (,!mfl:H:nf;I~; mf·mbl~r5hip; officers; expenses. There hereby IS mittee shall consist of 3 Circuit Court Judges, 2 District 'H,jfi~l! ,;!fill i:'Jf.,bli·,iH;r! a Jurij(;wl Conference of the State of Oregon. The Court Judges, 1 Judge of the Court of Appeals and 2 i. The Executive Secretary of the Conference shall serve Supreme Court Judges, including the Chief Justice who as Secretary to the Executive Committee. f!J~lh'F'l\t,,~ ',!l;tH f;tm:'l~f of all tlw judqC5 of the Supreme Court, the Court shall be Chairman. IIf l'iilifl·,lh. till; OMIIHl Tax Court, thC! circuit courts and the district courts. b. The Executive Committee shall supervise the work of 2. NOMINATING COMMITTEES • til" Cblf.,f ,JW,til,tl !,;hall be chairman of the conf(mmce and shall have power the Conference, possessing and exercising all the powers a. The Chief Justice may appoint three nomin(lting com­ of the Conference when the Conference is not in session. fq IIlVI!"

'HHlh I' 4JU u4,. 't9tlO t~.f)!)2 § la; 19()5l~.494 § 161 ------~, ------

Constitution of Oregon Article VII (Amended) Judicial Department l~lUillZII !F .._I' Imlill.~1 lUll 51U; m IIInlid

supreme court to find the defendant in a criminal case guilty of '.1' 1;,"1"') I'ir~'tllif. 'If 1,,11'10['; t~r(fi', of offu"o; r;omrJCn$uIlOn Soc. a. Jury trial; re-examination of issues by appellate court; record Section 6. Incompetency or malfeasance of public officer. on app'"al to Supreme Court; affirmance notwithstanding an offense for which a greater penalty is provided than that of Public officers shall not be impreached; but incompentency, 1.) I!"',t/"."·,,I t,{ lwlt/w" fr<, illl v) tumporary udIV() ~.!rlli IA!nUln H!~lle(;I~, liy ,p!:,,!ill Section 4. Supreme Court; terms; statements of decisions ment as may have been prescribed by law, 'It h,t ~1~ tihtJ:. 7. Oath of office of Judges of Supreme Cou,t [Created through initiative petition filed July 7, 191 Q, adopted by of court. The terms of the supreme court shall be appointed people Nov. 8, 1910) 8, Removal of judges by law; but there shall be one term at the seat of government 9 Juries of less than 12 jurors annually. At the close of each term the judges shall file with Section 7, Oath of office ol Judges of Supreme Court. the secretary of state co"cise written statements of the Every judge of the supreme court, before entering upon tho Sj~(:tlUn 1. Court!.; election of judges; term of office; com' (3) Assign judges of courts inferior to the Supreme Court decisions made at that term, duties of his office, shall take and subscribe, and transmit to [Created through initiative pp,tition filed July 7, 1910, adopted by pen"lt\on, JIlt' IW!IU,il JHlVWf of t!w ~t(lti! shilll I)(! vested in to serve temporarily outside the district for which they were the secretary of state, the following oath: people Nov. 8, 1910J hili' ',Iljill'ntl' 1;"'1rt .lIld ill f,w,h other courts d~ may from elected. "1,____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that tum' ft, tl/llI' I.,. f.1/!.Jtl;d by l"w, Thu Jud(J£.'~ of thl} suprema A judge or member of the bar so appointed or assigned Section 5. Juries; indictment; information. In civil cases I will support the constitution of the United States, and the ,1I11! "till'! 1:!IIltt'. '.1.,111 III' 1~It~ctl'd by tltt' h!fJul votrJrs of the shall while serving have all the judicial powers and duties of a three-fourths of the jury may render a verdict. The Legislative constitution of the State of Oregon. and that I will faithfully '.f,ltl' III pf tllI'lI 1i!'"lI:ltJVI! d!"tw;tr, for a term of six years. regularly elected judge of the court to which he is assigned or AS5embly shall so provide that the most competent of the and impartially discharge the duties of a judge of the supreme •l!1d ',!loll! [I"U'IV!.' I,Udl UJrnpIHISJtJllI\ a~ InJY lJu provided by appointed . court of this state, according to the best of my ability, and !Cmated through S,J.R No, 30, 195'7, adopted by people Nov. 4, permanent citizens of the county shall be chosen for jurors; and l.I'N wllldt Inmpt!lI'nltlUIi ',hall !lot bl' dllnsnislll'd durin!] tht' 1(58) out of the Whole number in attendance at the court, seven that I will not accept any other office, except judicial officos, INti! for whit It Hmy ilfP l'lmtmi shall be chosen by lot as grand jurors, five of whom must during the term for which I have been elected." i!II'.II.',! fI,I""'I" Ulltl.jllVIJ Pl!t'IIIHI 111!'d July I. 1t110. adl.lptcd hy Section 2b. Inferior courts may be affected in certain [Created through initiative petition filed July 7, 1910, adopted by 1'1"'1'11' f,l,.'. II, "1101 concur to find an indictment. But provision may be made by people Nov, 8, 1910) respects by special or local laws. Notwithstanding the pro­ law for drawing and summoning the grand jurors from the Sl'ctWIl la. Rotiroll1unt of jUdg(lS; recall to temporary visions of suction 23, Article IV of this Constitution. laws regular jury list at any time, separate from the panel of petit Section 8. Removal of judges. (1) In the manner provided lIGtlVU servlco. Nutwlth;.ftllldllltl thl! provisu)ll<; of section 1, Groating courts inferior to the Supreme Court or prescribing jurors, for empanelling more than one grand jury in a county by law, and notwithstanding section 1 of this Article, a judge ,\1 II! I.! VII IAIIl'!lIIh!dl of till', GlJrH.tltution, a judge of any and definin!) the jurisdiction of such courts or the manner in and for the sitting of a grand jury during vacation as well as of any court may be removed from his judicial office by the • nlll t ',Iull fl'WU tWill judll:IJI officn at till' ()nd of the cah;n­ which such jurisdiction may be exercised, may be made session of the court. No person shall be charged in any circuit Supreme Court for: ILl! 1/",11 11\ willd: IH' .IUJitl!i tlw il!)O of 7G yp.ors. Thl! Legisla' applicat)le: court with the commission of any crime or misdemeanor (a) Conviction in a court of this or any other state, or of ·llv,' A',',i'II11!ly 1,1 ttll' peoph' may by law: (1) To all judicial districts or other subdivisions of this state; defined or made punishable by any of the laws of th is state, the United States, of a crime punishable as a felony or a (11 11)<, d 11"/,1'1 tltjl' for Illtllld.ltOIY retirl'rmmt not n"rlier or except upon indictment found by a grand jury; provided, crime involving moral turpitude; or flt,HI 1111' 1.'IlI! "t tilt· t,II/'nd,1! yt!JI III willch till! judnc ott11 l'h'l~h'li m .IPpointl!d pllm to or at the time standing· error; determination of case by Supreme Court. In ments, and the pro.cedure after the filing of such information tCreated through S.J.R. No.9. 1967; adopted by people Nov, 5, 1!l6S) "f dPJllilV,11 ,mil I pIli tt'mpllrt} of equity cases on appeal to the supreme court. Provided, that .,Iwb .nh'I,,'! hi tilt' !lI1Ph'UH' (,\IWt nothing Hl this section shall be construed to authorize the -31-