African Americans and Religious Freedom
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Founders and the Freedom of Religion: an Introduction
The Founders and the Freedom of Religion: An Introduction Religion has always been important in America. During the colonial and Revolutionary eras, religion permeated the lives of Americans. Blue laws kept the Sabbath holy and consumption laws limited the actions of everyone. Christianity was one of the few links that bound American society together from Maine to Georgia. The Bible, in addition to being the divine word of God that would guide people through life's journey to the next world, served as a textbook for history, a source book for morals, a primer for mothers to teach their children how to read, and a window through which to view and understand human nature. Because religion and morality were seen as necessary components of stable society, colonial and Revolutionary governments supported religion. Clergymen were among the most influential members of the community and many of them actively participated in government. The liberal religious traditions embodied in the charters and fundamental laws of Rhode Island, Pennsylvania, New Jersey, Maryland, and the Carolinas read very much like the declarations of indulgences promulgated by Charles II and James II that were so bitterly denounced by the Anglican clergy and members of Parliament. Like a magnet, however, these liberal policies attracted Dissenters to these religiously benevolent colonies. Although colonists often emigrated to the New World to escape religious persecution, many new Americans readily discriminated against others on the basis of religion. Nine of the thirteen American colonies authorized established churches--the Congregational Church in New England and the Anglican Church in the Middle and Southern colonies. -
African American Perspectives with Emphasis on the Perspective of Black Liberation Theology
D. PROVIDENCE AND HISTORIES: AFRICAN AMERICAN PERSPECTIVES WITH EMPHASIS ON THE PERSPECTIVE OF BLACK LIBERATION THEOLOGY Introduction Black theology as a particular perspective and method in the field of theology is a relatively new phenomenon which has roots in the religious history of the slave ancestors of today's African-Americans.1 Black theology, like most theology, is essentially an attempt to understand the meaning and purpose of human life in the context of a community which believes in God. Black theologies, though diverse, all seek to understand the meaning and pur- pose of Black humanity in the context of a society which is inimical and oppres- sive to its existence. Recent news report would suggests that assertions that African- Americans are the victims of systemic genocide may not be too radical. The infant mortality rate of African-American babies in major United States cities is equal to that of some third world countries; the life expectancy of Blacks decreased in the last six months; suicide rates have increased; the major threat to life for Black males between the ages of 22 and 45 is murder; Black males and females experience a higher rate of incarceration in prisons; deaths by aids and drugs is steadily increas- ing; etc. The development "life statistics" have complex histories but the envi- ronmental stresses of high unemployment, homelessness, miseducation, poor medical care, general poverty, and racism are contributing factors. These condi- tions have a systemic origin and require systemic solutions. John W. Fleming suggests that in its initial stages of development, Black the- ology was united in its goal but diverse in its response in addressing the reality of the "color-caste system" and oppression which characterize the social reality of African-Americans. -
Lorraine Hansberry Lecture Series October 11, 12, & 13
Friends of The James Brown African American Room Proudly Present: Lorraine Hansberry Lecture Series October 11, 12, & 13 Film Screening & Discussion Thursday, October 11, 2018 @ 6PM Join us for a special viewing of A Raisin in the Sun with screened commentary by Lorraine Hansberry and members of the original cast. Discussion to follow and light refreshments served. Film Screenings Friday, October 12, 2018 @ 10AM – 4:45PM All day viewing of films featuring Lorraine Hansberry. Discussion and Book Signing Looking for Lorraine: The Radiant Life of Lorraine Hansberry by author Imani Perry, Ph.D. Saturday, October 13, 2018 @ 11AM The Hughes-Rogers Professor of African American Studies and faculty associate in the Program in Law and Public Affairs and Gender and Sexuality Studies at Princeton, Imani Perry has written and taught on a number of topics regarding race and African American culture. In her 2011 book, More Beautiful and More Terrible: The Embrace and Transcendence of Racial Inequality in the United States, for example, Perry discusses the ongoing intersection of race and politics in America. Perry is also the author of Prophets of the Hood: Politics and Poetics in Hip Hop and May We Forever Stand: A History of the Black National Anthem, a cultural history of the black national anthem, “Lift Every Voice and Sing.” Perry received a bachelor’s degree from Yale University. She then obtained both her J.D. from Harvard Law School and a Ph.D in the history of American civilization from Harvard University. ALL PROGRAMS ARE FREE AND OPEN TO THE PUBLIC. Main Library / James Brown African American Room The Newark Public Library 5 Washington Street, Newark, NJ 07102 www.npl.org [email protected] 973-733-5411 . -
Freedom, Democracy and Economic Welfare
copyright The Fraser Institute copyright The Fraser Institute LORD BAUER RAMON DIAZ MILTON FRIEDMAN RAYMOND D GASTIL TIBOR R MACHAN DOUGLASS NORTH SVETOZAR PEJOVICH ALVIN RABUSHKA INGEMAR STAHL LINDSAY M WRIGHT PROCEEDINGS OF AN INTERNATIONAL EDITED BY MICHAEL A WALKER SYMPOSIUM copyright The Fraser Institute Proceedings of an International Symposium on Economic, Political, and Civil Freedom, held October 5-8, 1986 in Napa Valley, California. This event is part of the programme of Liberty Fund Inc., under the direction of its President, Dr W. W. Hill. This Symposium was managed by The Fraser Institute and organized by its Director, Dr. Michael A. Walker. Canadian Cataloguing in Publication Data Main entry under title: Freedom, democracy and economic welfare Symposium held Oct 5-8, 1986 in Napa Valley, Calif. Includes bibliographical references. ISBN 0-88975-116-1 1.Capitalism – Congresses. 2. Liberty – Congresses. 3. Economics – Political aspects – Congresses. 4. Economics – Philosophy – Congresses. I. Walker, Michael 1945 – II.Fraser Institute (Vancouver, BC.) HB501.F74 1988 330.12’2 C88-091102-6 Copyright 1988 by the Fraser Institute. All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any manner whatsoever without written permission except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical arti- cles and reviews. Printed in Canada copyright The Fraser Institute CONTENTS Participants / vii Preface, Michael A. Walker / ix PART ONE POLITICAL, ECONOMIC AND CIVIL FREEDOMS: A CONCEPTUAL, HISTORICAL AND STATISTICAL OVERVIEW 1 INSTITUTIONS, ECONOMIC GROWTH AND FREEDOM: AN HISTORICAL INTRODUCTION, Douglass C. North / 3 Discussion / 26 2 CAPITALISM AND FREEDOM, Milton Friedman / 47 Discussion / 59 3 THE STATE OF THE WORLD POLITICAL AND ECONOMIC FREEDOM, Raymond D. -
Unit 24 Individualism and Communitarianism
Gandhism (Dharma, UNIT 24 INDIVIDUALISM AND Swaraj, Sarvodaya and COMMUNITARIANISM Satyagraha) Structure 24.0 Objectives 24.1 Introduction 24.1.1 Individualist Versus Communitarian Position 24.1.2 Relevance in the Indian Context 24.2 Meaning and Development of Individualism 24.2.1 Atomism and Methodological Individualism 24.2.2 Views of Contractualists Including John Rawls 24.2.3 Views of Utilitarians 24.3 The Individualist Conception of the Self 24.4 The Individualist Theory of the Nature and Functions of the State 24.4.1 Functions of State and Government 24.5 Communitarianism: An Introduction 24.6 The Communitarian Critique of the Individualist Conception of the Self 24.6.1 Two Main Limitations of Individualism 24.7 The Communitarian Critique of the Idea of State Neutrality 24.8 Let Us Sum Up 24.9 Some Useful References 24.10 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises 24.0 OBJECTIVES Our objective in this unit is to understand and assess one of the major ongoing debates in contemporary political theory; namely, the debate between liberal individualism and communitarianism. After studying this unit, you should be able to: • Understand the individualistic theory of the nature and functions of state; • Describe and assess the communitarian critique of liberal individualism; • Compare the major theoretical positions of individualism and communitarianism; and • Understand the relevance of this debate to contemporary political theory and practice. 24.1 INTRODUCTION In this unit, you will be introduced to one of the central debates in contemporary political theory, namely, the debate between liberal individualism and communitarianism. The debate between individualism and communitarianism developed and became central to political theory during the 1980s with the publication of Michael Sandel’s Liberalism and the Limits of Justice (1982). -
Religion–State Relations
Religion–State Relations International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 8 Religion–State Relations International IDEA Constitution-Building Primer 8 Dawood Ahmed © 2017 International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (International IDEA) Second edition First published in 2014 by International IDEA International IDEA publications are independent of specific national or political interests. Views expressed in this publication do not necessarily represent the views of International IDEA, its Board or its Council members. The electronic version of this publication is available under a Creative Commons Attribute-NonCommercial- ShareAlike 3.0 (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0) licence. You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the publication as well as to remix and adapt it, provided it is only for non-commercial purposes, that you appropriately attribute the publication, and that you distribute it under an identical licence. For more information on this licence visit the Creative Commons website: <http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/> International IDEA Strömsborg SE–103 34 Stockholm Sweden Telephone: +46 8 698 37 00 Email: [email protected] Website: <http://www.idea.int> Cover design: International IDEA Cover illustration: © 123RF, <http://www.123rf.com> Produced using Booktype: <https://booktype.pro> ISBN: 978-91-7671-113-2 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................. 3 Advantages and risks ............................................................................................... -
Chapter 4 Freedom and Progress
Chapter 4 Freedom and Progress The best road to progress is freedom’s road. John F. Kennedy The only freedom which deserves the name, is that of pursuing our own good in our own way, so long as we do not attempt to deprive others of theirs, or impeded their efforts to obtain it. John Stuart Mill To cull the inestimable benefits assured by freedom of the press, it is necessary to put up with the inevitable evils springing therefrom. Alexis de Tocqueville Freedom is necessary to generate progress; people also value freedom as an important component of progress. This chapter will contend that both propositions are correct. Without liberty, there will be little or no progress; most people will consider an expansion in freedom as progress. Neither proposition would win universal acceptance. Some would argue that a totalitarian state can marshal the resources to generate economic growth. Many will contend that too much liberty induces libertine behavior and is destructive of society, peace, and the family. For better or worse, the record shows that freedom has increased throughout the world over the last few centuries and especially over the last few decades. There are of course many examples of non-free, totalitarian, ruthless government on the globe, but their number has decreased and now represents a smaller proportion of the world’s population. Perhaps this growth of freedom is partially responsible for the breakdown of the family and the rise in crime, described in the previous chapter. Dictators do tolerate less crime and are often very repressive of deviant sexual behavior, but, as the previous chapter reported, divorce and illegitimacy are more connected with improved income of women than with a permissive society. -
Tricia Rose. 2008. the Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop-And Why It Matters
Tricia Rose. 2008. The Hip Hop Wars: What We Talk About When We Talk About Hip Hop-And Why It Matters. New York: Basic/Civitas Books. Reviewed by Beau Bothwell As hip hop slowly settles into middle age, the pitched battles of its younger years have frozen in a stalemate. Critics of hip hop repeat the same attacks they leveled at NWA, decrying violence, misogyny, and homophobia in hip hop lyrics, and in the most extreme cases branding its creators as Typhoid Marys for a particularly virulent social pathology. Defenders respond with rebuttals codified in the early 1990s, lauding the aesthetic value and social relevance of their favorite corners of the hip-hop world, eliding any problems inherent in the rest, and questioning the true motives of hip hop's critics. As Tricia Rose tells it, these arguments have remained essentially static, even as hip hop experienced two remarkable-though opposing-developments. First, hip hop expanded. The dress, music, dance, and visual style that grew up in the South Bronx not only took hold throughout American culture, but throughout cultures of the world. Within the US media landscape, hip hop music, fashion, and visual aesthetics became ubiquitous. Outside of the US, local hip-hop movements emerged around the world, whether in the form of a few MCs in a bedroom reciting Tupac lyrics in English, or a full-fledged scene in a local language and style. Remaining closely identified with urban, black youth (in ways that Rose describes as sometimes quite unhealthy), hip hop has become an aspect of self-definition for a widespread and diverse group of people, many of whom identify as part of the "Hip-Hop Generation" united less by a period of birth than by a set of shared cultural practices (Kitwana 2002). -
Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia
Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe Volume 17 Issue 2 Article 1 4-1997 Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia Larisa Skuratovskaya Academy of Medical Science, Moscow, Russia Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree Part of the Christianity Commons, and the Law Commons Recommended Citation Skuratovskaya, Larisa (1997) "Freedom of Religion and the Legal Status of Religion in Russia," Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe: Vol. 17 : Iss. 2 , Article 1. Available at: https://digitalcommons.georgefox.edu/ree/vol17/iss2/1 This Article, Exploration, or Report is brought to you for free and open access by Digital Commons @ George Fox University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Occasional Papers on Religion in Eastern Europe by an authorized editor of Digital Commons @ George Fox University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. FREEDOM OF RELIGION AND THE LEGAL STATUS OF RELIGION IN RUSSIA By Larisa Skuratovskaya Dr. Larisa Skuratovskaya (Russian Orthodox) is a medical doctor at the Institute of General pathology and Patho-physiology at the Academy of medical Science in Moscow, Russia. She is interested in women;s rights, anti-nuclear campaigns, religious freedom, environmental and socio-medical advocacy. This paper was written in February 1996 while she was a trainee of the Center for the Study of Human Rights, Columbia University and European Commission of Human Rights, Strassbourg, France. With Russia's accession to the Council of Europe, this pan-European organization now stretches from the Pacific Ocean in the East to the Atlantic Ocean in the West. -
Why Protect Religious Freedom?
THE YALE LAW JOURNAL MICHAEL W. MCCONNELL Why Protect Religious Freedom? Why Tolerate Religion? BY BRIAN LEITER PRINCETON, NJ: PRINCETON UNIVERSITY PRESS, 2012, PP. 208. $24.95. AUTHOR. Richard and Frances Mallery Professor and Director of the Constitutional Law Center, Stanford Law School; Senior Fellow, Hoover Institution. The author wishes to thank William Baude, Nathan Chapman, Richard Epstein, Chad Flanders, Robert George, Luke Goodrich, Paul Harold, Joshua Hawley, Steffen Johnson, Burt Neuborne, Eric Rassbach, James Sonne, and Eugene Volokh for helpful comments on an earlier draft, and Spencer Churchill and Mark Storslee for invaluable research assistance. 770 REVIEW CONTENTS INTRODUCTION 772 1. "TOLERATION" 777 II. THE PHILOSOPHICAL ARGUMENT 781 A. Religion as a Subset of Conscience 782 B. "Insulation from Evidence" 786 C. Rawls 789 D. Mill 792 E. Schauer and "Governmental Incompetence" 795 III. THE LEGAL ARGUMENTS 797 A. Free Exercise Exemptions 797 B. Harm 803 C. Establishment of a "Vision of the Good" 807 771 THE YALE LAW JOURNAL 123:770 2013 INTRODUCTION Religious beliefs have always generated controversy. But religious freedom - the right of individuals and groups to form their own religious beliefs and to practice them to the extent consistent with the rights of others and with fundamental requirements of public order and the common good-has long been a bedrock value in the United States and other liberal nations. Religious freedom is one thing nearly all Americans, left and right, religious and secular, have been able to -
Download the Transcript
1 BLACK-2016/11/21 THE BROOKINGS INSTITUTION BLACK AMERICA SINCE MLK: AND STILL I RISE Washington, D.C. Monday, November 21, 2016 Welcome: GLENN HUTCHINS Co-Founder and Co-Chief Executive, Silver Lake Partners Vice Chairman of the Board, The Brookings Institution Remarks: ROBERT LOUIS GATES, JR. Alphonse Fletcher, Jr. University Professor Harvard University Moderator: CHARLAYNE HUNTER-GAULT Journalist Panelists: DAYNA BOWEN MATTHEW Visiting Fellow, Center for Health Policy The Brookings Institution MICHAEL ERIC DYSON Professor of Sociology, Georgetown University ELEANOR HOLMES NORTON (D-DC) U.S. House of Representatives JAMES PETERSON Director of Africana Studies and Associate Professor of English Lehigh University RICHARD REEVES Senior Fellow and Co-Director, Center on Children and Families The Brookings Institution Closing Remarks: SHARON PERCY ROCKEFELLER President and Chief Executive Officer WETA * * * * * ANDERSON COURT REPORTING 706 Duke Street, Suite 100 Alexandria, VA 22314 Phone (703) 519-7180 Fax (703) 519-7190 2 BLACK-2016/11/21 P R O C E E D I N G S MR. HUTCHINS: My name’s Glenn Hutchins. It’s my privilege to welcome you here tonight. I’m vice chairman of Brookings and founder of the Hutchins Center. In the Amazon, the rain forest, not the retailer, Skip, near the rubber trading entrepot of Manaus there’s a phenomenon known as “the Meeting of the Waters” at which the confluence of two mighty rivers form the Amazon. They are the Rio Negro, which true to its name looks completely black, and the sandy-colored Rio Solimões. I think that’s how you pronounce it in Portuguese. -
The Books That Inspired Imani Perry: “Whitewashing Race by Michael K
blogs.lse.ac.uk http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2012/05/13/academic-inspiration-imani-perry/ The books that inspired Imani Perry: “Whitewashing Race by Michael K. Brown has a human sensitivity that is often lacking when we talk about race and power”. May 13 2012 Imani Perry is a distinguished scholar of law, literature, and American culture and history who has written extensively on racial inequality. Imani shares her early interest in African American politics and social justice movements, tells how Shakespeare drove her interest in inequality, and discusses her passion for the photography of Roy DeCarava. My mother recently reminded me that when I was 7 years old I announced to her that I wanted to read “all the books about famous Black people.” I suppose that was the first inkling that I was going to find my way to teaching in African American studies. It was 1979, and I was witnessing the shift from the Black power era in which I had been taught to raise my right fist and say “all power to the people”, to a growing backlash against all the social justice movements of the 60s and 70s. This shift appeared in subtle and not so subtle ways. After summer vacation, I entered second grade to find “Disco sucks” scrawled all over the bathroom stalls at my predominantly white private school (striking a bit of fear in my heart as a small black girl who loved Donna Summer and Sylvester.) That November, Reagan announced his candidacy for president, and promised to take back America in the town where three civil rights workers, Goodman Schwerner, and Chaney, had been murdered.