New Mexico Prioritized Statewide Bicycle Network Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

New Mexico Prioritized Statewide Bicycle Network Plan New Mexico Prioritized Statewide Bicycle Network Plan DECEMBER 2018 New Mexico Prioritized Statewide Bicycle Network Plan December 2018 NM Bike Plan Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the help of the following New Mexico Department of Transportation staff in helping to create this plan, as well as the organizations that supported the development of the plan through participation in coordinating meetings, public meetings, and feedback. NMDOT would like to thank the engaged residents of New Mexico and beyond who provided valuable public comment and input throughout the planning process. New Mexico Department of Transportation Secretary Tom Church Jonathan Fernandez Deputy Secretary Anthony Lujan Judith Gallardo Aaron Chavarria Ken Murphy Adam Romero Kimberly Gallegos Afshin Jian Larry Maynard Ami Evans Lawrence Lopez Antonio Jaramillo Leo Montoya Arif Kazmi Manon Arnett Armando Armendariz Margaret Haynes Bill Craven Nancy Perea Bill Hutchinson Paul Brasher David Trujillo Rhonda Lopez Delane Baros Richard Pena Emilee Cantrell Richard Ramoso Francisco Sanchez Rick Padilla Franklin Garcia Rosa Kozub Gabe Lucero Rosanne Rodriguez Gabriela Contreras-Apodaca Shannon Glendenning Harold Love Stephanie Parra Heather Sandoval Stephen Lopez Jennifer Mullins Tamara Haas Jessica Crane Tim Parker Jessica Griffin Trent Doolittle Jill Mosher Wade Patterson Jolene Herrera Yvonne Aragon Participating Organizations City of Santa Fe Bicycle Trails Advisory Committee El Paso MPO Members and Staff Farmington MPO Members and Staff FHWA-New Mexico Division Greater Albuquerque Bicycle Advisory Committee Mesilla Valley MPO Bicycle and Pedestrian Facilities Advisory Committee Mesilla Valley MPO Members and Staff Mid Region MPO Members and Staff Mid Region RTPO Members and Staff Mid-Region Active Transportation Committee Northeast RTPO Members and Staff Northern Pueblos RTPO Members and Staff Northwest RTPO Members and Staff Santa Fe MPO Members and Staff South Central RTPO Members and Staff Southeast RTPO Members and Staff Southwest RTPO Members and Staff Consultant Project Team Bohannon Houston, Inc. Alta Planning + Design Aaron Sussman Sam Piper Denise Aten Maggie Brown Melanie Bishop Mike Rose Curtis Sanders Ian Sansom TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction ...................................................................................................................... 13 Key Products ..................................................................................................................... 14 Organization of the NM Bike Plan ..................................................................................... 14 II. Vision and Goals ............................................................................................................. 17 Goals & Action Items ......................................................................................................... 1 7 III. Public and Stakeholder Outreach ................................................................................. 21 In-Person Outreach ........................................................................................................... 2 1 Online Outreach ................................................................................................................ 21 IV. Benefits of Bicycling and Bicycle Planning ................................................................ 35 Planning for Bicycling ........................................................................................................ 35 Benefits of Bicycling .......................................................................................................... 35 Complete Streets ............................................................................................................... 38 V. Bicycle Planning in New Mexico ................................................................................... 41 Legal Rights and Responsibilities of Bicyclists .................................................................. 41 Bicycle Behavior and Trends ............................................................................................. 41 State Planning Context and Supporting Documents ......................................................... 43 Designated and Proposed Bicycling Routes ..................................................................... 48 VI. Development of the Priority Network ........................................................................... 53 Quantitative Evaluation ...................................................................................................... 53 Qualitative Review ............................................................................................................. 63 VII. Priority Network ............................................................................................................ 65 Priority Tier Definitions ...................................................................................................... 65 Tier 2 Basic Facilities ......................................................................................................... 78 NM Highways and Locations with Special Considerations ................................................ 79 VIII. Design Guidelines ....................................................................................................... 83 Roadway Context and Design Guidance ........................................................................... 83 Bikeway Facility Types ...................................................................................................... 91 Incorporating Bicycle Infrastructure into Roadway Design ................................................ 97 Maintenance Strategies ................................................................................................... 102 National and State Design References ........................................................................... 104 IX. Implementation and Recommendations .................................................................... 107 Implementation ................................................................................................................ 107 Recommendations ........................................................................................................... 111 FIGURES Figure 1 | NM Statewide Prioritized Bicycle Network ........................................................... 15 Figure 2 | Types of Bicyclists – NM State Bike Plan Survey ................................................ 23 Figure 3 | Types of U.S. Bicyclists ........................................................................................ 23 Figure 4 | Online Survey Results Summary, part 1 .............................................................. 24 Figure 5 | Online Survey Results Summary, part 2 .............................................................. 25 Figure 6 | Online Survey Results Summary, part 3 .............................................................. 26 Figure 7 | Online Input Map – Feedback Summary .............................................................. 27 Figure 8 | Online Input Map .................................................................................................. 28 Figure 9 | Interpreting the Online Input Maps ....................................................................... 29 Figure 10 | State Roadway I Like to Bike ............................................................................. 30 Figure 11 | State Roadway I Bike, But Could be Improved .................................................. 31 Figure 12 | State Roadway I'd Like to Use, But Needs Improvement .................................. 32 Figure 13 | Difficult Bicycling Locations ................................................................................ 33 Figure 14 | Priority Tier Levels by Mode, New Mexico 2040 Plan ........................................ 44 Figure 15 | Typical Road Diet Reconfiguration ..................................................................... 47 Figure 16 | Demand Analysis Composite Results in Small Towns and Rural Areas ............ 58 Figure 17 | Composite Demand in Urban Areas .................................................................. 59 Figure 18 | Composite Equity Map ....................................................................................... 62 Figure 19 | Priority Network – Statewide .............................................................................. 67 Figure 20 | Priority Network – District 1 ................................................................................ 68 Figure 21 | Priority Network – District 2 ................................................................................ 69 Figure 22 | Priority Network – District 3 ................................................................................ 70 Figure 23 | Priority Network – District 4 ................................................................................ 71 Figure 24 |Priority Network – District 5 ................................................................................. 72 Figure 25 | Priority Network – District 6 ................................................................................ 73 Figure 26 | Priority Network – Albuquerque Area ................................................................. 74 Figure 27 | Priority Network – Las Cruces Area ................................................................... 75 Figure 28
Recommended publications
  • History of Route 66 (The Will Rogers Memorial Highway)
    History of Route 66 History of Route 66 (the Will Rogers Memorial Highway) US Route 66 is also known as: • the Will Rogers Highway • the Main Street of America • the Mother Road It was established on November 11, 1926 as one of the original highways in the US Highway System, and became one of the most famous roads in the United States. Road signs were erected in 1927. It originally ran from Chicago, Illinois, through the states of Missouri, Kansas, New Mexico and Arizona before ending in Santa Monica, California, near Los Angeles, covering 2,448 miles or 3,940 kilometres. It was recognised in popular culture by the hit song ‘(Get Your Kicks on) Route 66’ in the 1960s. It features in John Steinbeck's classic American novel, The Grapes of Wrath (1939). Route 66 was a primary route for those who migrated west, especially during the Dust Bowl of the 1930s. The road supported the economies of the communities through which it passed. People doing business along the route became prosperous as the highway became more popular. The same people later fought to keep the highway alive in the face of the growing threat of being bypassed by the new Interstate Highway System. Route 66 underwent many improvements and realignments over its lifetime, but was officially removed from the United States Highway System on 26 June 1985. It had been entirely replaced by segments of the Interstate Highway System. Portions of the road that passed through Illinois, Missouri, New Mexico, and Arizona have been named ‘Historic Route 66’.
    [Show full text]
  • In Creating the Ever-Growing Adventure Cycling Route Network
    Route Network Jasper Edmonton BRITISH COLUMBIA Jasper NP ALBERTA Banff NP Banff GREAT PARKS NORTH Calgary Vancouver 741 mi Blaine SASKATCHEWAN North Cascades NP MANITOBA WASHINGTON PARKS Anacortes Sedro Woolley 866 mi Fernie Waterton Lakes Olympic NP NP Roosville Seattle Twisp Winnipeg Mt Rainier NEW Elma Sandpoint Cut Bank NP Whitefish BRUNSWICK Astoria Spokane QUEBEC WASHINGTON Glacier Great ONTARIO NP Voyageurs Saint John Seaside Falls Wolf Point NP Thunder Bay Portland Yakima Minot Fort Peck Isle Royale Missoula Williston NOVA SCOTIA Otis Circle NORTHERN TIER NP GREEN MAINE Salem Hood Clarkston Helena NORTH DAKOTA 4,293 mi MOUNTAINS Montreal Bar Harbor River MONTANA Glendive Dickinson 380 mi Kooskia Butte Walker Yarmouth Florence Bismarck Fargo Sault Ste Marie Sisters Polaris Three Forks Theodore NORTH LAKES Acadia NP McCall Roosevelt Eugene Duluth 1,160 mi Burlington NH Bend NP Conover VT Brunswick Salmon Bozeman Mackinaw DETROIT OREGON Billings ADIRONDACK PARK North Dalbo Escanaba City ALTERNATE 395 mi Portland Stanley West Yellowstone 505 mi Haverhill Devils Tower Owen Sound Crater Lake SOUTH DAKOTA Osceola LAKE ERIE Ticonderoga Portsmouth Ashland Ketchum NM Crescent City NP Minneapolis CONNECTOR Murphy Boise Yellowstone Rapid Stillwater Traverse City Toronto Grand Teton 507 mi Orchards Boston IDAHO HOT SPRINGS NP City Pierre NEW MA Redwood NP NP Gillette Midland WISCONSIN Albany RI Mt Shasta 518 mi WYOMING Wolf Marine Ithaca YORK Arcata Jackson MINNESOTA Manitowoc Ludington City Ft. Erie Buffalo IDAHO Craters Lake Windsor Locks
    [Show full text]
  • SOUNDS LIKE a PLAN the Official Newsletter of APA New Mexico
    Winter 2019-2020 JANUARY 2020 SOUNDS LIKE A PLAN The Official Newsletter of APA New Mexico Our Year In Review IN THIS ISSUE On behalf of the Board of the American Planning WHO WE ARE - Association—New Mexico Chapter, it is our pleasure CHAPTER OVERVIEW to present this Annual Report and Winter Newsletter PAGE 2 to our Membership. The Chapter capped off a busy year by co-hosting the annual confer- FINANCIAL REPORT & ence together with our partner Western Planner (please see article on page 6 for more details on the conference). STRATEGIC PLAN PAGE 4 At the end of the year, the Chapter supported the nomination of three distinguished members to the College of Fellows of the AICP: Dale Dekker, AICP; Phyllis Taylor, AICP; and Kizito Wijenje, AICP. WESTERN PLANNER RECAP Behind the scenes, our Treasurer has been working hard on taxes and PAGE 6 working on our non-profit incorporation, which will facilitate easier chapter management in the future. Also, look for us to roll out a new Chapter website by mid-February, 2020, once we deal with some ran- 2019 CHAPTER som-ware issues. AWARDS In between, we also participated in UNM-APA’s annual Meet the PAGE 8 Planners Event, which allows future planners to network with practic- ing planning professionals. In addition, last spring, we partnered with our allied professionals in architecture, engineering, and landscape PLANNER SPOTLIGHT: architecture for a multi-disciplinary professional mixer. LUCY FOMA! We have divided the rest of this Annual Report/Newsletter into two PAGE 10 sections: the first three pages provide an overview of the Chapter’s demographics, financials, and 2019-2020 Strategic Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • New Mexico State Page 2020
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Community Assistance Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance Program New Mexico News A mesa at San Ildefonso Pueblo Photo Credit: MARELBU courtesy of Wikimedia Commons 2020 PROJECTS The National Park Service Rivers, Trails and Conservation Assistance (RTCA) program supports nonprofit organizations, community groups, tribes, and local, state, and federal government agencies. We help partners work together to create parks, develop trails and greenways, protect rivers and natural areas, and increase access to recreation opportunities. We help you engage a wide range of 5 2 community partners and also work to connect you to National Park Service (NPS) managed areas. 1 The RTCA program in New Mexico offers a wide range of services that can be tailored to meet the needs of an individual project. The NPS staff members are trained facilitators who 3 encourage project leaders to build collaborative partnerships among governmental and non-governmental stakeholders. We help communities and groups define their vision, goals, and objectives; analyze issues and opportunities; and develop 4 strategic action plans and time lines for projects. We do not 6 provide financial assistance, but can help project partners identify 7 and secure sources of funding and technical support. Find out more about how the National Park Service is supporting projects in New Mexico on the next page. CURRENT PROJECTS 1. Tucumcari Five Mile Park 2. Crownpoint Pathways 3. Rio Grande Trail - Socorro Valley Segment 4. Truth or Consequences Trails & River Access 5. San Ildefonso Pueblo Trails 6. Western New Mexico Internship Collaborative 7. NPS Visitation and Tourism Strategy in New Mexico View of the Rio Grande Trail - Socorro Valley Segment area.
    [Show full text]
  • \Ryhereas, the Valencia County Commission Met Upon Notice of Meeting Duly Published on April 17, 2019, at 5:00 P.M
    VALENCIA COUNTY BOÄRD OF COUNTY COMMISSIONERS RESoLUTION IIþ 2019- s4l ADOPTION OF MIDDLE RIO GRANDE ECONOMIC DEYELOPMENT PLAN \ryHEREAS, the Valencia County Commission met upon notice of meeting duly published on April 17, 2019, at 5:00 P.M. in the Valencia County Administration Building, 444 Luna Avenue, Los Lunas, New Mexico 87031; and, IVHEREAS, NMSA 1978, Section4-37-l (1995) provides that Counties have the power to, "provide for the safety, preserve the health, promote the prosperity and improve the morals, order, comfort and convenience of any county or its inhabitants"; and, \ryHEREAS, NMSA, 1978, Section 4-38-18 (1976) provides thataBoard of County Commissioner has the duty and authority "[t]o represent the county and have the care of the county property and the management of the interest of the county in all cases where no other provision is made by law; and, WHEREAS, the Middle Rio Grande Economic Development Association was formed amongst the members of Catron, Sierra, Socorro and Valencia Counties to develop the region into one that is both state and nationally competitive; and, WHEREAS, the MRGEDA identified those industries that are anticipated to provide the region with a competitive economic advantage, including (1) agriculture, (2) arts, entertainment, recreation, and visitor industries, (3) health care, (4) renewable energy and forest products, and (5) technology; and, IVHEREAS, in addition to articulating goals with respect to each of these sectors, the MRGEDA identified both detailed strategies and specifrc,target outcomes with respect to each sector that are designed to promote the prosperity of the region. NOIV, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Board of County Commissioners of the County of Valencia by the authority granted the Board by the laws of the State of New Mexico and people of Valencia County, that the Board hereby adopts the20l6 Middle Rio Grande Economic Development Association's 2016 Economic Development Plan.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 4 DRAFT Contents Rio Grande Trail Master Plan: Threading Partnerships
    Chapter 4 DRAFT Contents Rio Grande Trail Master Plan: Threading Partnerships ....................................................................................................... 3 Overview ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3 Pursuing National Trail Designation ..................................................................................................................................... 4 inset box: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 4 inset box: .............................................................................................................................................................................. 5 El Camino Real Historic Trail ........................................................................................................................................ 5 Continental Divide Trail .................................................................................................................................................. 5 Establishing a Governance Structure .................................................................................................................................... 5 Establish a Rio Grande Trail Nonprofit ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Open Spacespace
    OPENOPEN SPACESPACE newsletter Mayor Martin J. Chávez A Quarterly Newsletter of the Open Space Division and the Open Space Alliance Volume 6, Issue 4, October - December 2005 OPEN SPACE POLICE Still Dedicated to Open Space At the end of last year the Open Space With that change, please continue your vigi- Police (OSP) were absorbed into the Albuquer- lance on the trails and report any and all inci- que Police Department (APD). As a special unit dences that violate Open Space rules and regula- in APD administered by Captain Mike Castro and tions. Lieutenant Ruben Griego, the Open Space Police Please note that safety issues that require continue patrolling and responding to calls immediate attention will continue to be reported affecting Open Space properties and facilities. to Open Space Administrative Offices at 452-5206. Of course, there have been some changes. Thank you for your continued dedication to The OSP vehicles are now striped and marked in Open Space and happy trails! the APD tradition. You may see officers dressed in APD blue or bicycle black while others still sport the familiar tan and green. You may also encounter Open Space officers patrolling city parks, too. But does this affect you as a citizen or vol- unteer and the protocol for contacting the Open Space Division to report problems in Open Space? No. Except who you call to report prob- lems. Although Open Space Administrative Offices continue to maintain a dispatch unit for opera- Familiar faces: APD Open Space officers Luis Zamarron (L) and tions and maintenance, Open Space Police are George Gabaldon (R) now directly dispatched through APD.
    [Show full text]
  • USBRS Survey and Case Studies, July, 2013
    U.S. Bike Route System: Surveys and Case Studies of Practices from Around the Country July 2013 U.S. Bike Route System Surveys & Case Studies TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ................................................................................................................................ i Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ i State Coordinator Survey .................................................................................................................................... i Non‐Governmental Organization Survey .......................................................................................................... iv Case Studies ..................................................................................................................................................... iv Conclusion ........................................................................................................................................................ ix Introduction .......................................................................................................................................... 1 State Coordinator Survey Overview ........................................................................................................ 1 Accomplishments .................................................................................................................................. 2
    [Show full text]
  • National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form
    NPS Fann 10-900-b (Rev. 01/2009) 0MB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Multiple Property Documentation Form This fonn is used for documenting property groups relating to one or several historic contexts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin How to Complete the Multiple Property Documentation Form (fonnerly 16B). Complete each item by entering the requested infonnation. For additional space, use continuation sheets (Fonn 10-900-a). Use a typewriter, word processor, or computer to complete all items xx New Submission ----- Amended Submission A. Name of Multiple Property Listing Camino Real in New Mexico, AD 1598-1881 B. Associated Historic Contexts 1. Geography and natural character; physical character and setting of the road 2. Exploration and settlement, invasion and war 3. Social, political and cultural significance 4. Economic and commercial significance See pp. 3-70 C. Form Prepared by name/title Thomas Merlan, Michael P. Marshall, and John Roney organization Merlan Associates LLC date May 1, 2010 street & number 1677 Cerro Gordo Road telephone (505) 983-2645 city or town _S_a_nt_a_F_e___________________ st_a_te __ N_M ____ z_.ip_co_d_e_8_7_5_0_1 __ e-mail [email protected] D. Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act of 1966, as amended, I hereby certify that this documentation fonn meets the National Register documentation standards and sets forth requirements for the listing of related properties consistent with the National Register criteria. This submission meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR 60 and the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines for Archeology and Historic Preservation.
    [Show full text]
  • Santa Fe Metropolitan BICYCLE MASTER PLAN a Component of the Santa Fe Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2010-2035
    Santa Fe Metropolitan BICYCLE MASTER PLAN A Component of the Santa Fe Metropolitan Transportation Plan 2010-2035 Approved: APRIL 12, 2012 Preparation of this Plan was funded by grants from the New Mexico Department of Transportation, U.S. Department of Transportation (Federal Highways Administration and Federal Transit Administration) and local funds from Santa Fe MPO member jurisdictions. The policies, findings, and recommendations contained in this Plan do not necessarily represent the views of the state and federal agencies identified above and do not obligate those agencies to provide funding to implement the contents of the Plan as adopted. The Santa Fe MPO assures that no person shall, on the grounds of race, color, national origin, or sex as provided by Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Civil Rights Restoration Act of 1987 (P.L. 100.259), be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be otherwise subjected to discrimination under any program or activity. Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Information: Materials can be provided in alternative formats by contacting the Santa Fe MPO at (505) 955-6625. Direct assistance with the development of the Bicycle Master Plan was provided by: Tim Rogers - Transportation Consultant Unless otherwise credited, photographs in this document are courtesy of Tim Rogers and Keith Wilson. Santa Fe Metropolitan Planning Organization Transportation Policy Board City of Santa Fe Santa Fe County Councilor Patti Bushee, Vice-Chair Commissioner, Daniel Mayfield, Chair
    [Show full text]
  • 103494 FSPLT3 3985492.Pdf
    Environmental Assessment CONTENTS Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Regulatory Framework ................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Project Location ............................................................................................................................ 2 1.3 Purpose and Need ......................................................................................................................... 4 1.4 Decision to be Made ..................................................................................................................... 5 1.5 Plan Conformance ......................................................................................................................... 5 1.6 Internal Scoping and Agency Coordination .................................................................................. 8 1.7 Tribal Coordination ....................................................................................................................... 9 1.8 External Scoping and Public Outreach ......................................................................................... 9 2 PROJECT ALTERNATIVES ..................................................................................................... 12 2.1 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Chronicles of the Trail
    Chronicles of the Trail Quarterly Journal of the Camino Real de Tierra Adentro Trail Association Vol. 5, No. 3 Fall 2009 de La O Saloon, Village of Doña Ana, New Mexico PRESIDENT’S MESSAGE Probably the best time the board and its president had was the hosting of a number of conferences on the Camino Real: In 2006, CARTA held a special session at the 10th International Camino Real de Tierra Adentro Colloquium in Socorro, sponsored by the BLM/NPS/INAH; in 2007, we hosted a Camino Real session in Lerdo, Durango, and Ben Brown and I participated at another in Durango, Durango; at the Camino Reales symposium in Chihuahua, Chihuahua, in 2008, CARTA had its own session organized and chaired by Ben Brown that included CARTA members Joe Sanchez and Pat Beckett, and six other professionals from Mexico and Latin America presenting papers; and this past spring CARTA hosted a special Camino Real symposium at the Camino Real International Heritage Center. In conjunction with our symposium in Las Cruces, September 18-20, 2009, we held a meeting of the outgoing board, and a general membership Patrick Lucero Beckett meeting where we saluted our departing officers and board members, Patrick Beckett, John Bloom, William Little, Cameron Saffell and George Torok, and announced the results of the election. [Editors’ Note: see“Your CARTA Officers and Board” on page 8.] The This September marks the end of my term two-day symposium on the Camino Real featured as President of El Camino Real de Tierra Adentro twenty-four papers given by speakers from both Trail Association.
    [Show full text]