Unioverse a Phylogenomic Resource for Reconstructing the Evolution Of
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic
water Review Fresh- and Brackish-Water Cold-Tolerant Species of Southern Europe: Migrants from the Paratethys That Colonized the Arctic Valentina S. Artamonova 1, Ivan N. Bolotov 2,3,4, Maxim V. Vinarski 4 and Alexander A. Makhrov 1,4,* 1 A. N. Severtzov Institute of Ecology and Evolution, Russian Academy of Sciences, 119071 Moscow, Russia; [email protected] 2 Laboratory of Molecular Ecology and Phylogenetics, Northern Arctic Federal University, 163002 Arkhangelsk, Russia; [email protected] 3 Federal Center for Integrated Arctic Research, Russian Academy of Sciences, 163000 Arkhangelsk, Russia 4 Laboratory of Macroecology & Biogeography of Invertebrates, Saint Petersburg State University, 199034 Saint Petersburg, Russia; [email protected] * Correspondence: [email protected] Abstract: Analysis of zoogeographic, paleogeographic, and molecular data has shown that the ancestors of many fresh- and brackish-water cold-tolerant hydrobionts of the Mediterranean region and the Danube River basin likely originated in East Asia or Central Asia. The fish genera Gasterosteus, Hucho, Oxynoemacheilus, Salmo, and Schizothorax are examples of these groups among vertebrates, and the genera Magnibursatus (Trematoda), Margaritifera, Potomida, Microcondylaea, Leguminaia, Unio (Mollusca), and Phagocata (Planaria), among invertebrates. There is reason to believe that their ancestors spread to Europe through the Paratethys (or the proto-Paratethys basin that preceded it), where intense speciation took place and new genera of aquatic organisms arose. Some of the forms that originated in the Paratethys colonized the Mediterranean, and overwhelming data indicate that Citation: Artamonova, V.S.; Bolotov, representatives of the genera Salmo, Caspiomyzon, and Ecrobia migrated during the Miocene from I.N.; Vinarski, M.V.; Makhrov, A.A. -
Biogeographical Homogeneity in the Eastern Mediterranean Sea. II
Vol. 19: 75–84, 2013 AQUATIC BIOLOGY Published online September 4 doi: 10.3354/ab00521 Aquat Biol Biogeographical homogeneity in the eastern Mediterranean Sea. II. Temporal variation in Lebanese bivalve biota Fabio Crocetta1,*, Ghazi Bitar2, Helmut Zibrowius3, Marco Oliverio4 1Stazione Zoologica Anton Dohrn, Villa Comunale, 80121, Napoli, Italy 2Department of Natural Sciences, Faculty of Sciences, Lebanese University, Hadath, Lebanon 3Le Corbusier 644, 280 Boulevard Michelet, 13008 Marseille, France 4Dipartimento di Biologia e Biotecnologie ‘Charles Darwin’, University of Rome ‘La Sapienza’, Viale dell’Università 32, 00185 Roma, Italy ABSTRACT: Lebanon (eastern Mediterranean Sea) is an area of particular biogeographic signifi- cance for studying the structure of eastern Mediterranean marine biodiversity and its recent changes. Based on literature records and original samples, we review here the knowledge of the Lebanese marine bivalve biota, tracing its changes during the last 170 yr. The updated checklist of bivalves of Lebanon yielded a total of 114 species (96 native and 18 alien taxa), accounting for ca. 26.5% of the known Mediterranean Bivalvia and thus representing a particularly poor fauna. Analysis of the 21 taxa historically described on Lebanese material only yielded 2 available names. Records of 24 species are new for the Lebanese fauna, and Lioberus ligneus is also a new record for the Mediterranean Sea. Comparisons between molluscan records by past (before 1950) and modern (after 1950) authors revealed temporal variations and qualitative modifications of the Lebanese bivalve fauna, mostly affected by the introduction of Erythraean species. The rate of recording of new alien species (evaluated in decades) revealed later first local arrivals (after 1900) than those observed for other eastern Mediterranean shores, while the peak in records in conjunc- tion with our samplings (1991 to 2010) emphasizes the need for increased field work to monitor their arrival and establishment. -
Freshwater Bivalve (Unioniformes) Diversity, Systematics, and Evolution: Status and Future Directions Arthur E
Natural Resource Ecology and Management Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications 6-2008 Freshwater bivalve (Unioniformes) diversity, systematics, and evolution: status and future directions Arthur E. Bogan North Carolina State Museum of Natural Sciences Kevin J. Roe Iowa State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/nrem_pubs Part of the Evolution Commons, Genetics Commons, Marine Biology Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, and the Terrestrial and Aquatic Ecology Commons The ompc lete bibliographic information for this item can be found at http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ nrem_pubs/29. For information on how to cite this item, please visit http://lib.dr.iastate.edu/ howtocite.html. This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural Resource Ecology and Management at Iowa State University Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Natural Resource Ecology and Management Publications by an authorized administrator of Iowa State University Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Freshwater bivalve (Unioniformes) diversity, systematics, and evolution: status and future directions Abstract Freshwater bivalves of the order Unioniformes represent the largest bivalve radiation in freshwater. The unioniform radiation is unique in the class Bivalvia because it has an obligate parasitic larval stage on the gills or fins of fish; it is divided into 6 families, 181 genera, and ∼800 species. These families are distributed across 6 of the 7 continents and represent the most endangered group of freshwater animals alive today. North American unioniform bivalves have been the subject of study and illustration since Martin Lister, 1686, and over the past 320 y, significant gains have been made in our understanding of the evolutionary history and systematics of these animals. -
Velesunio Wilsoni (Lea, 1859)
Velesunio wilsoni (Lea, 1859) Diagnostic features This species is compressed, rather elongate for genus (height/length ratio <53%). Shell length up to 125 mm; tapered posteriorly, not winged or very slightly winged; ventral margin slightly rounded in juveniles, straight in adults. The anterior muscle scars are moderately impressed and the hinge teeth are Velesunio wilsoni (adult size 90-125 mm) Clarke Creek, saac River waterhole is the type locality of Velesunio wilsoni. Photo M. Klunzinger. Distribution of Velesunio wilsoni. smooth. Siphons are lightly pigmented (cf. Velesunio angasi). Classification Velesunio wilsoni (Lea, 1859) Common name: Wilson's mussel Class Bivalvia I nfraclass Heteroconchia Cohort Palaeoheterodonta Order Unionida Superfamily Hyrioidea Family Hyriidae Subfamily Velesunioninae Genus Velesunio redale, 1934 Original name: Unio wilsoni Lea, 1859. Lea, . (1859). Descriptions of twenty one new species of exotic Unionidae. Proceedings of the Academy of Natural Sciences of Philalphia 11: 151-154. Type locality: ssac River,Queensland. Synonyms: Unio (Alasmodon) stuarti A. Adams & Angas, 1864; Centralhyria wilsonii caurina redale, 1934. State of taxonomy The last major taxonomic revision of Australian freshwater mussels was by McMichael and Hiscock (1958). Based on the available molecular results, Walker et al. (2014) pointed out that a re-assessment of Australian hyriids is needed. Biology and ecology Shallow burrower in silty sand/mud in streams, billabongs and slow-flowing rivers. Suspension feeder. Larvae (glochidia) are brooded in the marsupia of the gills of females and, when released, become parasitic on the gills or fins of fish where they likely undergo metamorphosis before dropping to the sediment as free-living juvenile mussels. May be able to tolerate low oxygen concentrations and long periods out of water. -
Biological Resources
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES Wildlife The French Creek watershed contains a wealth of wildlife resources, both aquatic and terrestrial. There is an abundance of species of special concern, considered rare, threatened, or endangered in the state and in the nation, and also numerous game and non-game species. This amazing biodiversity leads to an enormous array of wildlife viewing and outdoor recreation opportunities. Perhaps more importantly, is the significance and importance this exceptional biodiversity places on conservation initiatives in the French Creek watershed. Terrestrial Mammals There are 63 extant species of mammals in the Commonwealth with another 10 species considered either uncertain or extirpated within Pennsylvania (Merritt, 1987). Fifty species of mammals have ranges that overlap with the French Creek watershed (Appendix F). No rare, threatened, or endangered mammals are listed for the French Creek watershed, although a few have general ranges that include the watershed. There have been unconfirmed reports of river otters (Lutra canadensis) seen on French Creek. These individuals, once common in the watershed, may be making their way back to French Creek due to reintroduction efforts in western New York and on the Allegheny River in Pennsylvania. Many of the mammals once common in the watershed and in other areas of the state have been lost due to the decline of large expanses of forested areas, these include the marten (Martes americana), fisher (Martes pennanti), and mountain lion (Felis concolor). The white-tailed deer (Odocoileus virginianus), eastern chipmunk (Tamias striatus), woodchuck (Marmota monax), striped skunk (Mephitis mephitis), porcupine (Erethizon dorsatum), eastern cottontail rabbit (Sylvilagus floridanus), short-tailed shrew (Blarina brevicauda), little brown bat (Myotis lucifugus), raccoon (Procyon lotor), muskrat (Ondatra zibethica), opossum (Didelphis marsupialis), and beaver (Castor canadensis), are some of the more common mammals found in the French Creek watershed (French Creek Project, web). -
Hyridella (Protohyridella) Glenelgensis (Dennant,1898)
Hyridella (Protohyridella) glenelgensis (Dennant,1898) Diagnostic features This small species is distinctive in having a thick, amygdaloid- shaped (almond-shaped) shell with a very strong hinge and strong shell sculpture of distinct rugose ridges and wrinkles. There is a Hyridella (Protohyridella) glenelgensis (Holotype) Hyridella (Protohyridella) glenelgensis (adult size 32-40 mm) Distribution of Hyridella (Protohyridella) glenelgensis. posterior wing with a prominent ridge. The beaks are heavily sculptured with 'VĘ shaped ridges and that sculpture extends onto the adult shell. Colour on outer surface olive to dark brown. nside valves bluish, stained brown around the beaks. The shell reaches 40 mm in length and the height/length ration is 55- 60%. This species is separated from Hyridella (Hyridella) on the basis of its distinctive shell sculpture but is otherwise like Hyridella (Hyridella) in other shell features and general anatomy. McMichael & Hiscock (1958) noted that this species has prominent siphons of equal size, the exhalant siphon being brick red, inhalant being darker with three rows of internal papillae. The marsupium occupies the middle third of the inner demibranch in females. Classification Hyridella (Protohyridella) glenelgensis (Dennant,1898) Class Bivalvia I nfraclass Heteroconchia Cohort Palaeoheterodonta Order Unionida Superfamily Hyrioidea Family Hyriidae Subfamily Hyriinae Genus Hyridella Swainson, 1840 Subgenus Protohyridella Cotton & Gabriel, 1932 (Type species: Unio glenelgensis Dennant, 1898). Original name: Unio glenelgensis Dennant, 1898. Dennant, J. (1898). Description of a new species of Unio from the River Glenelg. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 10: 112-113. Type locality: Roseneath, Glenelg River, Victoria. State of taxonomy The last major taxonomic revision of Australian freshwater mussels was by McMichael and Hiscock (1958). -
Post-Drought Evaluation of Freshwater Mussel Communities
Post-drought evaluation of freshwater mussel communities in the upper Saline and Smoky Hill rivers with emphasis on the status of the Cylindrical Papershell (Anodontoides ferussacianus) Submitted to the Kansas Department of Wildlife, Parks and Tourism by Andrew T. Karlin, Kaden R. Buer, and William J. Stark Department of Biological Sciences Fort Hays State University Hays, Kansas 67601 February 2017 1 Abstract The distribution of the Cylindrical Papershell (Anodontoides ferussacianus) in Kansas historically included a large portion of the state but is now seemingly restricted to the upper Smoky Hill-Saline River Basin in western Kansas. The species is listed as a “Species in Need of Conservation” within Kansas, and a survey conducted in 2011 emphasizing the status of the Cylindrical Papershell detected the species at low densities and relative abundances. Drought since the completion of the 2011 survey raised questions regarding the current status of the Cylindrical Papershell. The primary objectives of this study were to evaluate the conservation status of the Cylindrical Papershell in Kansas and evaluate possible post-drought changes in the composition of freshwater mussel communities in the Saline and Smoky Hill rivers. Nineteen sites on the Saline River and 21 sites on the Smoky Hill River were qualitatively surveyed. Two and 5 of these sites on the Saline and Smoky Hill rivers, respectively, were also sampled quantitatively. Eighteen live Cylindrical Papershell, 7 in the Saline River and 11 in the Smoky Hill River, were collected. At qualitative sites surveyed in 2011 and 2015, significant decreases in species richness at each site and live Cylindrical Papershell abundance were documented, though overall abundance of live mussels per site remained similar. -
Freshwater Molluscs
FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS Photo © Piotr Naskrecki Photo © Steven Buck, Illinois Natural History Survey BIODIVERSITY SAMPLING PROTOCOLS 185 RAPID BIOASSESSMENT METHODS FOR FRESHWATER MOLLUSCS Kevin S. Cummings1, Hugh A. Jones2 and Manuel Lopes-Lima3 Introduction Freshwater molluscs are found worldwide, occurring on all continents except Antarctica. There are approximately 1,200 species of freshwater bivalves, 97% of which belong to eight primary freshwater families: Unionidae, Margaritiferidae, Hyriidae, Mycetopodidae, Iridinidae, and Etheriidae (all Unionoida or freshwater mussels), Sphaeriidae, and Cyrenidae (both Veneroida) (Graf 2013). The world’s freshwater gastropod fauna comprises approximately 4,000 described species (Strong et al. 2008). Many species are globally imperiled and freshwater molluscs are considered to be the most threatened group of animals in the world (Williams et al. 1993; Lydeard et al. 2004; Johnson et al. 2013). Freshwater mussels (unionoids) are an integral component of aquatic ecosystems. Freshwater mussels can comprise >90% of the benthic biomass of rivers and an individual mussel can filter 40 L of water each day (Tankersley & Dimock 1993; Pusch et al. 2001; Strayer 2008). In addition, their shells function as substrate for many organisms including caddisflies, mayflies and other aquatic insects. Unionoids are often described as ecosystem engineers due to the direct and indirect physical effects that they have on freshwater ecosystems (Gutiérrez et al. 2003). Freshwater mussels also provide important direct services to humans, such as water purification, serving as an important prey for several mammals and commercial fishes, and providing a direct source of protein. Given their importance within aquatic ecosystems, the cascading consequences of unionoid declines can be considerable (Haag 2012; Vaughn et al. -
Survey of Texas Hornshell Populations in Texas: Years
FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT As Required by THE ENDANGERED SPECIES PROGRAM TEXAS Grant No. TX E-132-R-2 Endangered and Threatened Species Conservation Survey of Texas Hornshell Populations in Texas Prepared by: Drs. Lyubov Burlakova and Alexander Karatayev Carter Smith Executive Director Clayton Wolf Division Director, Wildlife 25 August 2014 FINAL REPORT STATE: ____Texas_______________ GRANT NUMBER: ___E – 132-R-2____ GRANT TITLE: Survey of Texas Hornshell Populations in Texas, Yr 2&3 REPORTING PERIOD: ____1 Sep 11 to 31 Aug 14 OBJECTIVE(S): To assess the current distribution of P. popeii in Texas; evaluate long-term changes in distribution range; locate and describe existing populations, and determine species’ habitat requirements. Segment Objectives: 1. Assess the current distribution of Popenaias popeii in Texas; 2. Evaluate long-term changes in distribution range; 3. Locate and describe existing populations, and (4) determine species’ habitat requirements. Significant Deviation: None. Summary Of Progress: Please see Attachment A. Location: Terrell, Maverick, Webb, and Val Verde counties, TX Cost: ___Costs were not available at time of this report.__ Prepared by: _Craig Farquhar_____________ Date: 25 Aug 2014 Approved by: ______________________________ Date:___ 25 Aug 2014 C. Craig Farquhar 2 ATTACHMENT A TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT TRADITIONAL SECTION 6 Joint Project with New Mexico Department of Game and Fish FINAL PERFORMANCE REPORT State: Texas Project Number: 419446 Project Title: “Survey of Texas Hornshell Populations in Texas” Time period: February 3, 2012 - August 31, 2014 Full Contract Period: 3 February 2012 To: 31 August 2014 (with requested 12-month no-cost extension) Principal Investigators: Lyubov E. Burlakova, Alexander Y. -
Towards a Global Phylogeny of Freshwater Mussels
Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 130 (2019) 45–59 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev Towards a global phylogeny of freshwater mussels (Bivalvia: Unionida): Species delimitation of Chinese taxa, mitochondrial phylogenomics, and T diversification patterns Xiao-Chen Huanga,b,1, Jin-Hui Sua,1, Jie-Xiu Ouyangc, Shan Ouyanga, Chun-Hua Zhoua, ⁎ Xiao-Ping Wua, a School of Life Sciences, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China b Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany c Medical Laboratory Education Center, Nanchang University, Nanchang 330031, China ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT Keywords: The Yangtze River Basin in China is one of the global hotspots of freshwater mussel (order Unionida) diversity DNA barcoding with 68 nominal species. Few studies have tested the validity of these nominal species. Some taxa from the Unionidae Yangtze unionid fauna have not been adequately examined using molecular data and well-positioned phylo- Yangtze River genetically with respect to the global Unionida. We evaluated species boundaries of Chinese freshwater mussels, DUI and disentangled their phylogenetic relationships within the context of the global freshwater mussels based on BAMM the multi-locus data and complete mitochondrial genomes. Moreover, we produced the time-calibrated phylo- Host-attraction geny of Unionida and explored patterns of diversification. COI barcode data suggested the existence of 41 phylogenetic distinct species from our sampled 40 nominal taxa inhabiting the middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River. Maximum likelihood and Bayesian inference analyses on three loci (COI, 16S, and 28S) and complete mitochondrial genomes showed that the subfamily Unioninae sensu stricto was paraphyletic, and the subfamily Anodontinae should be subsumed under Unioninae. -
Palaeoecology of the Arda Biota
Chapter 3 Palaeoecology of the Arda biota Fossil specimens collected in the Arda marine succession are identified and illustrated in this chapter (Crippa & Raineri submitted). Their ecology and palaeoecology is here discussed, focusing the attention on Glycymeris, Aequipecten and Arctica , as they represent the genera whose species have been used for the isotopic analyses; an in depth palaeoecological investigation is in fact important for interpreting the data resulting from the geochemical study. A discussion on the palaeoecological significance of the overall Arda fauna is also reported (Crippa et al., in prep.). 3.1 Faunal composition The fauna is composed by 159 taxa (Table 3.1; Pl. 1-11 at the end of this chapter) coming from 218 fossil beds, of which bivalves are dominant with 105 taxa, followed by gastropods (44 taxa) and a few corals (3 taxa) and serpulids (2 taxa); brachiopods, echinoids, barnacles, bryozoans and scaphopods do also occur in the fauna but they are left in open nomenclature due to their poor state of preservation. Bivalve taxonomy is a complicated topic in constant evolution; as Bieler & Mikkelsen (2006) observed “much of the taxonomic instability in bivalve research is not a result of conflicting hypotheses of relationships, but one of an overabundance of available names” and this is the main problem I dealt with the bivalve identification of the Arda assemblages. According to Jimenez et al. (2009) the status of many genera is still uncertain and species are assigned to different genera depending on the authors; nonetheless, there is certain stability in the species concept that allows adequate classification at the species levels. -
Kansas Freshwater Mussels ■ ■ ■ ■ ■
APOCKET GUIDE TO Kansas Freshwater Mussels ■ ■ ■ ■ ■ By Edwin J. Miller, Karen J. Couch and Jim Mason Funded by Westar Energy Green Team and the Chickadee Checkoff Published by the Friends of the Great Plains Nature Center Table of Contents Introduction • 2 Buttons and Pearls • 4 Freshwater Mussel Reproduction • 7 Reproduction of the Ouachita Kidneyshell • 8 Reproduction of the Plain Pocketbook • 10 Parts of a Mussel Shell • 12 Internal Anatomy of a Freshwater Mussel • 13 Subfamily Anodontinae • 14 ■ Elktoe • 15 ■ Flat Floater • 16 ■ Cylindrical Papershell • 17 ■ Rock Pocketbook • 18 ■ White Heelsplitter • 19 ■ Flutedshell • 20 ■ Floater • 21 ■ Creeper • 22 ■ Paper Pondshell • 23 Rock Pocketbook Subfamily Ambleminae • 24 Cover Photo: Western Fanshell ■ Threeridge • 25 ■ Purple Wartyback • 26 © Edwin Miller ■ Spike • 27 ■ Wabash Pigtoe • 28 ■ Washboard • 29 ■ Round Pigtoe • 30 ■ Rabbitsfoot • 31 ■ Monkeyface • 32 ■ Wartyback • 33 ■ Pimpleback • 34 ■ Mapleleaf • 35 Purple Wartyback ■ Pistolgrip • 36 ■ Pondhorn • 37 Subfamily Lampsilinae • 38 ■ Mucket • 39 ■ Western Fanshell • 40 ■ Butterfly • 41 ■ Plain Pocketbook • 42 ■ Neosho Mucket • 43 ■ Fatmucket • 44 ■ Yellow Sandshell • 45 ■ Fragile Papershell • 46 ■ Pondmussel • 47 ■ Threehorn Wartyback • 48 ■ Pink Heelsplitter • 49 ■ Pink Papershell • 50 Bleufer ■ Bleufer • 51 ■ Ouachita Kidneyshell • 52 ■ Lilliput • 53 ■ Fawnsfoot • 54 ■ Deertoe • 55 ■ Ellipse • 56 Extirpated Species ■ Spectaclecase • 57 ■ Slippershell • 58 ■ Snuffbox • 59 ■ Creek Heelsplitter • 60 ■ Black Sandshell • 61 ■ Hickorynut • 62 ■ Winged Mapleleaf • 63 ■ Pyramid Pigtoe • 64 Exotic Invasive Mussels ■ Asiatic Clam • 65 ■ Zebra Mussel • 66 Glossary • 67 References & Acknowledgements • 68 Pocket Guides • 69 1 Introduction Freshwater mussels (Mollusca: Unionacea) are a fascinating group of animals that reside in our streams and lakes. They are front- line indicators of environmental quality and have ecological ties with fish to complete their life cycle and colonize new habitats.