Parliamentary Debates (Hansard)
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Thursday Volume 661 13 June 2019 No. 313 HOUSE OF COMMONS OFFICIAL REPORT PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES (HANSARD) Thursday 13 June 2019 © Parliamentary Copyright House of Commons 2019 This publication may be reproduced under the terms of the Open Parliament licence, which is published at www.parliament.uk/site-information/copyright/. 799 13 JUNE 2019 800 Sir Patrick McLoughlin (Derbyshire Dales) (Con): House of Commons Will my right hon. Friend consider publishing a report, showing in table form the investment in transport in the north between 2010 and 2019, and between 2001 and Thursday 13 June 2019 2010, so that we can see what investment has been given to the north over the past nine years, and in the previous nine years, which just happened to be under a different The House met at half-past Nine o’clock Government? This Government can be incredibly proud of the investment in the north. PRAYERS Chris Grayling: I absolutely agree with my right hon. Friend. I pay tribute to him for what he did to step up investment in the north. When I listen to the Opposition [MR SPEAKER in the Chair] waxing about a lack of investment in the north, I simply remind them that when they were in power they let a Northern Rail franchise with no investment in it at all, whereas this Conservative Government are replacing Oral Answers to Questions every single train in the north with either a brand-new or a completely refurbished train. Mr Clive Betts (Sheffield South East) (Lab): When I TRANSPORT drive around Europe this summer, I will not find any two major cities less well connected than Sheffield and Manchester. A review has been done of improving the The Secretary of State was asked— road connections between those two cities, and there is now an agreed best wayforward. When will the Government Transport Connectivity: North of England activate that, so that we get an all-purpose, all-weather route between those two cities? 1. Judith Cummins (Bradford South) (Lab): What Chris Grayling: I can tell the hon. Gentleman that the steps his Department is taking to improve transport concept of the tunnel, which has been much reviewed connectivity in the north of England. [911316] and much discussed, is on the board agenda for the next Transport for the North meeting, and we are looking The Secretary of State for Transport (Chris Grayling): forward with interest to seeing the detail of those proposals. Mr Speaker, as you know, we have a big programme of It is clearly necessary to improve trans-Pennine links. investment in transport across the north, after decades That is why we are committed to dualling the A66 and of underinvestment. That includes replacing every single are putting in improvements on the A69. It is why I have train in the north of England, getting rid of the long- asked Highways England to start work on better links outdated Pacer trains, buying new trains for the Newcastle between east Lancashire and west Yorkshire. Quite clearly, upon Tyne Metro and investing nearly £3 billion in the particularly given the vulnerability of the M62 to bad road network in the north, including an extensive smart weather,a second route between Manchester and Sheffield motorways programme. The Transforming Cities funds must also be a part of the future. are delivering to individual cities the opportunity to improve metro systems. Andrew Bridgen (North West Leicestershire) (Con): Although North West Leicestershire is the centre of the Judith Cummins: The Secretary of State may have midlands, most people in London think it is in the north. seen that newspapers across the north have come together Despite delivering the highest economic growth outside again this week to call on the Government to commit to London and the south-east, we have no passenger railway a series of policy changes to power up the north. Towns station. What is the Secretary of State going to do and cities, villages and hamlets—despite our diversity, about that? Would not reopening the Ivanhoe line be an the north stands as one to call for more powers and excellent idea? more funding. At the heart of that must be the Chris Grayling: I am very much aware of the potential transformative new rail network linking the great north to expand services in the east midlands by bringing cities, including Bradford. Will the Secretary of State back into service some of the routes that no longer carry grasp this moment and make Northern Powerhouse passengers. It is why the new franchisees in the east Rail a priority, with a city centre station in Bradford? midlands will be looking at bringing back services on the Robin Hood line, and I am happy to commit to Chris Grayling: First, Northern Powerhouse Rail is a discuss with my hon. Friend in much more detail whether manifesto commitment for this Government. The work we can do something similar in future with the Ivanhoe is being done at the moment to take it forward. Indeed, line. as the hon. Lady should be aware, in the past few days we have published further details of the interchanges Andy McDonald (Middlesbrough) (Lab): Thirty-three between Northern Powerhouse Rail and HS2, thus northern newspapers, including the Manchester Evening demonstrating further our commitment to that project. News, The Northern Echo, the Yorkshire Post, the Sheffield With regard to Bradford, as the hon. Lady knows, I Star and the Liverpool Echo, are all supporting the have had meetings with the council leader. I am extremely Power Up The North campaign, demanding an end to sympathetic to the need to ensure that Bradford is a underinvestment in the north. This Government have proper part of the Northern Powerhouse Rail network. repeatedly broken their promises of investment in the north, 801 Oral Answers 13 JUNE 2019 Oral Answers 802 with the region set to receive just a fraction of the Michael Ellis: It is a little rich for the hon. Gentleman investment to be made in London, and “northern to refer to party politics. The fact is that Hammersmith powerhouse” has to be much more than a slogan. So bridge has been a project for London since 2015, and will the Secretary of State take the opportunity to the Mayor of London has done nothing about it. The commit not only to electrifying the trans-Pennine route, fact is that it is the responsibility of the London borough but to matching Labour’s £10 billion-plus commitment and Transport for London mechanisms. The hon. to deliver a Crossrail for the north? Gentleman does not want to admit the facts, but the facts are those. Chris Grayling: What I am not going to do is match Labour’s record of investment in the north, because it Greg Hands (Chelsea and Fulham) (Con): It is now was lousy. The Labour Government spent nothing on two months since the bridge closed, and the Thames is trains, and did not upgrade railways in the north. We uncrossable for a remarkable three and a half-mile are upgrading roads in the north, and upgrading railways stretch. In that time,the London Borough of Hammersmith across the north. The trans-Pennine upgrade is the and Fulham has not yet even produced a report diagnosing flagship—the largest investment programme on the railways the problems. All that it has done is have a row with in the next control period—and Labour Members have Labour-run Transport for London over funding for the brass neck to say that they are the ones with a plan. work when it has not yet worked out what it needs. Will They did nothing; we are doing things. my hon. Friend agree to meet the Mayor of London and the council to bang heads together between the two Hammersmith Bridge warring Labour authorities and get the bridge open again? 2. Zac Goldsmith (Richmond Park) (Con): If he will allocate funding to Transport for London for the repair Michael Ellis: We often see Labour authorities needing of Hammersmith bridge. [911317] to have their heads banged together, because they are often at war, as they appear to be in this case. It seems to The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Michael me that banging heads together in regard to this matter Ellis): The maintenance of Hammersmith bridge is a would be a good thing, and I will carefully consider my matter for the London Borough of Hammersmith and right hon. Friend’s request. Fulham. Neither the borough nor Transport for London has approached the Department to seek funding to Cycling repair the bridge. 3. Dr Sarah Wollaston (Totnes) (Ind): What steps he Zac Goldsmith: I am very disappointed that they have is taking to increase the uptake of cycling as a means of not done so. I understand the temptation for the transport. [911318] Government to see this as a local issue, but it is much more than that. Greater London has just 33 major The Minister of State, Department for Transport (Michael crossings; this one took 20,000 cars and 1,800 buses a Ellis): The Government are committed to increasing day, so its closure for up to three years is catastrophic cycling and walking, and to making our roads safer for for residents and businesses, and is causing mayhem in cyclists and pedestrians. Spending per head on cycling an already congested part of London. I was disappointed and walking has more than trebled since 2010, and to hear what the Minister said about not being approached about £2 billion is now being invested in cycling and by the borough or TfL—that needs to change—but the walking over the current Parliament.