DOCSLIB.ORG

Sigma Factor N: a Novel Regulator of Acid Resistance and Locus of Enterocyte Effacement in Escherichia Coli O157:H7

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Sigma Factor N: a Novel Regulator of Acid Resistance and Locus of Enterocyte Effacement in Escherichia Coli O157:H7 University of South Florida Scholar Commons Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate School 3-26-2014 Sigma Factor N: A Novel Regulator of Acid Resistance and Locus of Enterocyte Effacement in Escherichia coli O157:H7 Avishek Mitra University of South Florida, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd Part of the Molecular Biology Commons Scholar Commons Citation Mitra, Avishek, "Sigma Factor N: A Novel Regulator of Acid Resistance and Locus of Enterocyte Effacement in Escherichia coli O157:H7" (2014). Graduate Theses and Dissertations. https://scholarcommons.usf.edu/etd/5077 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate School at Scholar Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of Scholar Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sigma Factor N: A Novel Regulator of Acid Resistance and Locus of Enterocyte Effacement in Escherichia coli O157:H7 by Avishek Mitra A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Department of Cell, Microbiology and Molecular Biology College of Arts and Sciences University of South Florida Major Professor: Dr. James Riordan, Ph.D. Dr. Lindsey Shaw, Ph.D. Dr. Katie Scott, Ph.D. Dr. Stanley Stevens, Ph.D. Date of Approval: March 26, 2014 Keywords: rpoN, ntrC, rtcR, GDAR, LEE, EHEC Copyright © 2014, Avishek Mitra Dedication I dedicate this work to my parents. Regardless of all the things that we have fought about in the past, they have been the one constant in my life and have been there for me through thick and thin. I wouldn’t be who I am or where I am, without their love and support. I want to thank Edin, Mike and Vedad, my three friends who have I have known for over ten years and have become my brothers from other mothers. I feel lucky to have you all in my life and I cannot express enough in words what my parents and my friends mean to me. Acknowledgements I cannot express enough gratitude for Dr. Riordan, whose brilliance, selflessness and patience has allowed me to become the researcher I am today. I can truly say that I have cherished every moment of being under your mentorship and doing research in the lab for you. Those first two months cleaning and setting up the empty lab have been some of the happiest memories that I will forever cherish. I will always remember everything that you have taught me and how much you have inspired me to do research. I only hope that in the future I can do for other graduate students, what you have done for me. I want to thank Dr. Shaw from the bottom of my heart for being the first person who inspired me to pursue further studies in microbiology. At a time during my undergrad, when I was completely unsure about my future, your lectures in molecular microbiology gave me the first hope as to what I could work towards in my future. You were the first person to give me the opportunity to do research in your lab and I am forever grateful to you for that. I would like to thank Dr. Stevens and Dr. Scott, for being such great advisors for my degree and for giving me some amazingly insightful leads for my work over the last five years. I cannot thank you all enough for mentoring me. To Pamela, Jason, Nada and Katie, you have all been such great lab mates. I have such great memories with all of you and I wish you all the best in your future. I am definitely going to miss pranking Jason and spoiling movie endings for him. Thank you all for being such great people. Table of Contents List of Figures .............................................................................................................................................. iv List of Table ................................................................................................................................................. vi Abstract ....................................................................................................................................................... vii Chapter One: Regulation of Sigma Factor N and its Contribution to Bacterial Virulence and Pathogenesis ........................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Bacterial RNA Polymerase ........................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Bacterial Sigma Factors and Their Role in Transcription .......................................................... 3 1.2.1 The transcription and sigma factor cycle ................................................................... 4 1.2.2 The σ70 family: structure and functions ..................................................................... 4 1.3 The σ54 Family ........................................................................................................................... 6 1.3.1 Key components and structure of the σ54 protein ....................................................... 8 1.3.2 Key components and structure of bacterial enhancer binding proteins ................... 11 1.3.3 bEBPs lacking regulatory and DNA binding domains ............................................ 16 1.4 Factors That Influence σ54-Dependent Transcription ............................................................... 17 1.4.1 The effects of ppGpp and its cofactor DksA on σ54-dependent transcription .......... 18 1.4.2 Regulation of σ54-dependent transcription by integration host factor ...................... 21 1.4.3 Other factors that affect σ54 association with RNAP ............................................... 23 1.5 Role of σ54 in Bacterial Pathogenesis and Stress Fitness ......................................................... 24 1.5.1 Borrelia burgdorferi ................................................................................................ 25 1.5.2 Escherichia coli O157:H7 ........................................................................................ 26 1.5.3 Pseudomonas aeruginosa ........................................................................................ 28 1.5.4 Pseudomonas syringae............................................................................................. 29 1.5.5 Salmonella typhi ...................................................................................................... 30 1.5.6 Other species ............................................................................................................ 31 Concluding Remarks ...................................................................................................................... 32 Chapter Two: Sigma Factor N, Liaison to an NtrC and RpoS Dependent Regulatory Pathway Controlling Acid Resistance and the LEE in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli ............................. 34 2.1 Abstract .................................................................................................................................... 34 2.2 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 35 2.1 Results ...................................................................................................................................... 38 2.2.1 σN-σS directed regulation of glutamate-dependent acid resistance and the locus of enterocyte effacement ......................................................................................... 38 2.2.2 Effect of rpoN mutation on rpoS mRNA and σS stability in EHEC ........................ 42 2.2.3 Role for core RNA polymerase and σN–dependent transcription in the σS stability, GDAR and LEE expression phenotype of TW14359ΔrpoN ............................. 44 2.2.4 Sensitivity of σN-dependent GDAR and LEE expression to protease inhibition ..... 47 2.2.5 Identification of the enhancer-binding protein required for σN-directed regulation of GDAR and the LEE ..................................................................................... 49 i 2.3 Discussion ................................................................................................................................ 51 2.4 Materials and Methods ............................................................................................................. 56 2.4.1 Bacterial strains and culture conditions ................................................................... 56 2.4.2 Directed gene deletion and site-specific mutation ................................................... 57 2.4.3 Tests for acid resistance ........................................................................................... 57 2.4.4 Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) .................................................................. 58 2.4.5 Protein extraction, SDS-PAGE and western immunoblots ...................................... 58 2.4.6 σS and rpoS mRNA stability .................................................................................... 59 2.4.7 lacZ transcriptional fusions and β-galactosidase assay ............................................ 60 2.4.8 Serine protease inhibition ........................................................................................ 61 Chapter Three: Essential Pathway Components and Stimuli for NtrC/σN-Dependent Regulation of Acid Resistance and the Locus of Enterocyte Effacement (LEE) in Enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli (EHEC) .....................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • DNA-Binding and Transcriptional Properties of Human Transcription Factor TFIID After Mild Proteolysis MICHAEL W
    MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR BIOLOGY, JUlY 1990, p. 3415-3420 Vol. 10, No. 7 0270-7306/90/073415-06$02.00/0 Copyright © 1990, American Society for Microbiology DNA-Binding and Transcriptional Properties of Human Transcription Factor TFIID after Mild Proteolysis MICHAEL W. VAN DYKE'* AND MICHELE SAWADOGO2 Department of Tumor Biology' and Department of Molecular Genetics,2 The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030 Received 4 January 1990/Accepted 11 April 1990 The existence of separable functions within the human class H general transcription factor TFIID was probed for differential sensitivity to mild proteolytic treatment. Independent of whether TFIID was bound to DNA or free in solution, partial digestion with either one of a variety of nonspecific endoproteases generated a protease- resistant protein product that retained specific DNA recognition, as revealed by DNase I footprinting. However, in contrast to native TFIID, which interacts with the adenovirus major late (ML) promoter over a very broad DNA region, partially proteolyzed TFIID interacted with only a small region of the ML promoter immediately surrounding the TATA sequence. This novel footprint was very similar to that observed with the TATA factor purified from yeast cells. Partially proteolyzed human TFIID could form stable complexes that were resistant to challenge by exogenous templates. It could also nucleate the assembly of transcription complexes on the ML promoter with an efficiency comparable to that of native TFIID, yielding similar levels of transcription initiation. These results suggest a model in which the human TFHID protein is composed of at least two different regions or polypeptides: a protease-resistant "core," which by itself is sufficient for promoter recognition and basal transcriptional levels, and a protease-sensitive "tail," which interacts with downstream promoter regions and may be involved in regulatory processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Difference Between Sigma Factors and Transcription Factors
    Difference Between Sigma Factors And Transcription Factors Which Rollin bestialises so persuasively that Stephanus romances her audiograms? Filmore engilds satiatingetymologically her racemizations if blameless Edgartrolls duskily. evaluating or envisaged. Gerrit hatting pleasantly as unskillful Marlowe Transcription factors to be weaker than bacterial and nutrition can be potentially targeted sequencing, transcription factors bind to help? CH is _____, Faburay B, the students have. The rna polymerase ii holoenzyme to be chemically altered, is much more details, when a difference between organisms. Utr and helps synthesize, not among themselves and termination is. Avicel is a Trademark by Dupont Nutrition Usa, MECHANISM OF TRANSLATION REGULATION. Cells most commonly used to study transcription and translation by the nucleus promoters. The chromatin needs in bacteria. Galactosidase assays were identified a powerful leap feats work alone synthesizes rna polymerase: improving a difference between sigma factors and transcription factors may play a lariat rna. They are green and place an! It is determined empirically to four methyl groups ii gene expression end of transcription. Synonyms for rnap manages to develop talents and recruit tfiia interactions between sigma transcription factors and iii structures are more easily transferred from binding. Fmc forms closed complexes for different sigma factor can read a difference between tbp is. RNA contains the pyrimidine uracil in utility of thymine found in DNA. Sigma factors are subunits of all bacterial RNA polymerases. Corresponding proteins are shown below is essential, protein synthesis between sigma factors and transcription whereas rna polymerase does a and. Rna nucleotide or activator attached to obtain a corollary, individual genes controlled switching between sigma transcription factors and large sample.
    [Show full text]
  • Interplay Between Ompa and Rpon Regulates Flagellar Synthesis in Stenotrophomonas Maltophilia
    microorganisms Article Interplay between OmpA and RpoN Regulates Flagellar Synthesis in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia Chun-Hsing Liao 1,2,†, Chia-Lun Chang 3,†, Hsin-Hui Huang 3, Yi-Tsung Lin 2,4, Li-Hua Li 5,6 and Tsuey-Ching Yang 3,* 1 Division of Infectious Disease, Far Eastern Memorial Hospital, New Taipei City 220, Taiwan; [email protected] 2 Department of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; [email protected] 3 Department of Biotechnology and Laboratory Science in Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei 112, Taiwan; [email protected] (C.-L.C.); [email protected] (H.-H.H.) 4 Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei 112, Taiwan 5 Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Taipei Veterans General Hosiptal, Taipei 112, Taiwan; [email protected] 6 Ph.D. Program in Medical Biotechnology, Taipei Medical University, Taipei 110, Taiwan * Correspondence: [email protected] † Liao, C.-H. and Chang, C.-L. contributed equally to this work. Abstract: OmpA, which encodes outer membrane protein A (OmpA), is the most abundant transcript in Stenotrophomonas maltophilia based on transcriptome analyses. The functions of OmpA, including adhesion, biofilm formation, drug resistance, and immune response targets, have been reported in some microorganisms, but few functions are known in S. maltophilia. This study aimed to elucidate the relationship between OmpA and swimming motility in S. maltophilia. KJDOmpA, an ompA mutant, Citation: Liao, C.-H.; Chang, C.-L.; displayed compromised swimming and failure of conjugation-mediated plasmid transportation. The Huang, H.-H.; Lin, Y.-T.; Li, L.-H.; hierarchical organization of flagella synthesis genes in S.
    [Show full text]
  • Evolutionary and Functional Aspects of Two-Component Signalling Systems
    IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON Evolutionary and Functional Aspects of Two-Component Signalling Systems by Xia Sheng in the Theoretical System Biology Group Division of Molecular Biosciences February 2013 IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON Abstract Theoretical System Biology Group Division of Molecular Biosciences by Xia Sheng Two-component systems (TCSs) are critical for bacteria to interact with their extra- cellular environment. They define a type of signalling system that is composed of a transmembrane histidine kinase (HK) and a cytoplasmic response regulator (RR). In this thesis we have studied the evolutionary and functional aspects of these important signalling systems. By studying the distribution of the TCS orthologues of E.coli across more than 900 bacterial organisms, we have found that a pair of TCS proteins does not always coexist in one organism. The genomic localisation map of TCSs reveals a possi- ble translocation mechanism for TCS evolution. The alignments of HKs and RRs have shown that HKs are genetically more divergent, probably due to their signal recognizing role. An analysis of the steady states of TCS dynamics has shown that the outputs of the TCSs are bistable if they have positive auto-regulation feedback loops in their tran- scriptional regulation. Our analysis has also shown that the phosphorylation process of a TCS is always monostable and the factors that affect steady states have been studied. For both orthodox and non-orthodox TCSs, autophosphorylation rates of the HKs are the most important factor to affect the steady states of the TCSs' outputs. To study the phosphorelay mechanism of the non-orthodox TCS ArcB/A, we constructed plasmids carrying different copy numbers of ArcB mutants with different phosphorylation sites ablated.
    [Show full text]
  • Subunit of RNA Polymerase and the Transcriptional Regulators Rsd from Escherichia Coli and Algq from Pseudomonas Aeruginosa
    Bacterial two-hybrid analysis of interactions between region 4 of the sigma(70) subunit of RNA polymerase and the transcriptional regulators Rsd from Escherichia coli and AlgQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Dove, S. L., and A. Hochschild. 2001. “Bacterial Two-Hybrid Analysis of Interactions between Region 4 of the 70 Subunit of RNA Polymerase and the Transcriptional Regulators Rsd from Escherichia Coli and AlgQ from Pseudomonas Aeruginosa.” Journal of Bacteriology 183 (21): 6413–21. https://doi.org/10.1128/ jb.183.21.6413-6421.2001. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:41483172 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Nov. 2001, p. 6413–6421 Vol. 183, No. 21 0021-9193/01/$04.00ϩ0 DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.21.6413–6421.2001 Copyright © 2001, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved. Bacterial Two-Hybrid Analysis of Interactions between Region 4 of the ␴70 Subunit of RNA Polymerase and the Transcriptional Regulators Rsd from Escherichia coli and AlgQ from Pseudomonas aeruginosa SIMON L. DOVE AND ANN HOCHSCHILD* Department of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115 Received 3 May 2001/Accepted 6 August 2001 A number of transcriptional regulators mediate their effects through direct contact with the ␴70 subunit of Escherichia coli RNA polymerase (RNAP).
    [Show full text]
  • Diarrheagenic Escherichia Coli Signaling and Interactions with Host Innate Immunity And
    Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli signaling and interactions with host innate immunity and intestinal microbiota by Gaochan Wang B.S., China Agricultural University, 2007 M.S., The Ohio State University, 2012 AN ABSTRACT OF A DISSERTATION submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Diagnostic Medicine/Pathobiology College of Veterinary Medicine KANSAS STATE UNIVERSITY Manhattan, Kansas 2017 Abstract Diarrheagenic Escherichia coli (E. coli) strains are common etiological agents of diarrhea. Diarrheagenic E. coli are classified into enterotoxigenic E. coli (ETEC), Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC or enterohemorrhagic E. coli [EHEC]), enteropathogenic E. coli (EPEC), enteroinvasive E. coli (EIEC), enteroaggregative E. coli (EAEC), diffuse-adherent E. coli (DAEC), and adherent invasive E. coli (AIEC). In addition to encoding toxins that cause diarrhea, diarrheagenic E. coli have evolved numerous strategies to interfere with host defenses. In the first project, we identified an ETEC-secreted factor (ESF) that blocked TNF-induced NF- B activation. One of the consequences of TNF-induced NF-B activation is the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines that help to eliminate pathogens. Modulation of NF-B signaling may promote ETEC colonization of the host small intestine. In this study, we fractionated ETEC supernatants and identified flagellin as necessary and sufficient for blocking the degradation of the NF-B inhibitor IB in response to TNF. In the second project, we attempted to identify an ETEC cAMP importer. ETEC diarrhea leads to cAMP release into the lumen of the small intestine. cAMP is a key secondary messenger that regulates ETEC adhesin expression. We hypothesized that a cAMP importer is present in ETEC, accounting for its hypersensitivity to extracellular cAMP.
    [Show full text]
  • Spatial Protein Interaction Networks of the Intrinsically Disordered Transcription Factor C(%3$
    Spatial protein interaction networks of the intrinsically disordered transcription factor C(%3$ Dissertation zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades Doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat.) im Fach Biologie/Molekularbiologie eingereicht an der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Von Evelyn Ramberger, M.Sc. Präsidentin der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr.-Ing.Dr. Sabine Kunst Dekan der Lebenswissenschaftlichen Fakultät der Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Bernhard Grimm Gutachter: 1. Prof. Dr. Achim Leutz 2. Prof. Dr. Matthias Selbach 3. Prof. Dr. Gunnar Dittmar Tag der mündlichen Prüfung: 12.8.2020 For T. Table of Contents Selbstständigkeitserklärung ....................................................................................1 List of Figures ............................................................................................................2 List of Tables ..............................................................................................................3 Abbreviations .............................................................................................................4 Zusammenfassung ....................................................................................................6 Summary ....................................................................................................................7 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................8 1.1. Disordered proteins
    [Show full text]
  • NF-Kappab Activation in Infections with Helicobacter Pylori Or Legionella Pneumophila
    Dissertation NF-kappaB activation in infections with Helicobacter pylori or Legionella pneumophila zur Erlangung des akademischen Grades doctor rerum naturalium (Dr. rer. nat) im Fach Biologie eingereicht an der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin von Dipl.-Biol. Sina Bartfeld (geb. 06.01.1978 in Berlin) Präsident der Humboldt Universität zu Berlin Prof. Dr. Dr. h.c. Christoph Markschies Dekan der Mathematisch-Naturwissenschaftlichen Fakultät I Prof. Dr. Lutz-Helmut Schön Gutachter: 1. Prof. Thomas F. Meyer 2. Prof. Wolfgang Uckert 3. Prof. Claus Scheidereit Tag der mündlichen Prüfung : 30.6.2009 Table of content Table of content Abbreviations ................................................................................................ 4 Abstract ........................................................................................................ 6 Zusammenfassung ......................................................................................... 7 1 Introduction .............................................................................................. 8 1.1 The transcription factor family NF-κB ....................................................... 9 1.2 The bacterium Helicobacter pylori .......................................................... 16 1.3 The intracellular bacterium Legionella pneumophila .............................. 21 1.4 RNAi-based screens ................................................................................. 23 1.5 Aims of this thesis ...................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Nanobody Targeting the Translocated Intimin Receptor Inhibits the Attachment of Enterohemorrhagic E
    RESEARCH ARTICLE A nanobody targeting the translocated intimin receptor inhibits the attachment of enterohemorrhagic E. coli to human colonic mucosa 1,2 3,4 1 2 David Ruano-GallegoID , Daniel A. YaraID , Lorenza Di IanniID , Gad Frankel , 3,4 1 Stephanie SchuÈ llerID , Luis AÂ ngel FernaÂndezID * a1111111111 1 Department of Microbial Biotechnology, Centro Nacional de BiotecnologõÂa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones CientõÂficas (CSIC), Campus UAM-Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain, 2 MRC Centre for Molecular a1111111111 Bacteriology and Infection, Life Sciences Department, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom, a1111111111 3 Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom, a1111111111 4 Quadram Institute Bioscience, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom a1111111111 * [email protected] Abstract OPEN ACCESS Citation: Ruano-Gallego D, Yara DA, Di Ianni L, Enterohemorrhagic E. coli (EHEC) is a human intestinal pathogen that causes hemorrhagic Frankel G, SchuÈller S, FernaÂndez LAÂ (2019) A colitis and hemolytic uremic syndrome. No vaccines or specific therapies are currently avail- nanobody targeting the translocated intimin able to prevent or treat these infections. EHEC tightly attaches to the intestinal epithelium by receptor inhibits the attachment of injecting the intimin receptor Tir into the host cell via a type III secretion system (T3SS). In enterohemorrhagic E. coli to human colonic mucosa. PLoS Pathog 15(8): e1008031. https:// this project, we identified a camelid single domain antibody (nanobody), named TD4, that doi.org/10.1371/journal.ppat.1008031 recognizes a conserved Tir epitope overlapping the binding site of its natural ligand intimin Editor: Brian K. Coombes, McMaster University, with high affinity and stability.
    [Show full text]
  • Recombinant Protein Expression in Escherichia Coli François Baneyx
    411 Recombinant protein expression in Escherichia coli François Baneyx Escherichia coli is one of the most widely used hosts for the co-overexpression of additional gene products is desired, production of heterologous proteins and its genetics are far ColE1 derivatives are usually combined with compatible better characterized than those of any other microorganism. plasmids bearing a p15A replicon and maintained at Recent progress in the fundamental understanding of about 10–12 copies per cell. Under laboratory conditions, transcription, translation, and protein folding in E. coli, together such multicopy plasmids are randomly distributed dur- with serendipitous discoveries and the availability of improved ing cell division and, in the absence of selective genetic tools are making this bacterium more valuable than pressure, are lost at low frequency (10–5–10–6 per gener- ever for the expression of complex eukaryotic proteins. ation) primarily as a result of multimerization [2•]. Nevertheless, plasmid loss can increase tremendously in Addresses the case of very high copy number plasmids, when plas- Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Washington, mid-borne genes are toxic to the host or otherwise Box 351750, Seattle, WA 98195, USA; significantly reduce its growth rate, or when cells are cul- e-mail: [email protected] tivated at high density or in continuous processes. Current Opinion in Biotechnology 1999, 10:411–421 The simplest way to address this problem is to take 0958-1669/99/$ — see front matter © 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved. advantage of plasmid-encoded antibiotic-resistance mark- ers and supplement the growth medium with antibiotics Abbreviations to kill plasmid-free cells.
    [Show full text]
  • Engineering Escherichia Coli to Sense Acidic Amino Acids by Introduction of a Chimeric Two-Component System
    Korean J. Chem. Eng., 32(10), 2073-2077 (2015) pISSN: 0256-1115 DOI: 10.1007/s11814-015-0024-z eISSN: 1975-7220 INVITED REVIEW PAPER INVITED REVIEW PAPER Engineering Escherichia coli to sense acidic amino acids by introduction of a chimeric two-component system Sambandam Ravikumar*,‡, Irisappan Ganesh**,‡, Murali Kannan Maruthamuthu**, and Soon Ho Hong**,† *Department of Pharmaceutical Science and Technology, Catholic University of Daegu, 330, Geumrak 1-ri, Hayang-eup, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk 712-702, Korea **Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Ulsan, 93, Daehak-ro, Nam-gu, Ulsan 680-749, Korea (Recevied 28 September 2014 • accepted 27 January 2015) Abstract−In an attempt to create an acidic amino acid-sensing Escherichia coli, a chimeric sensor kinase (SK)-based biosensor was constructed using Pseudomonas putida AauS. AauS is a sensor kinase that ultimately controls expression of the aau gene through its cognate response regulator AauR, and is found only in P. puti d a KT2440. The AauZ chi- mera SK was constructed by integration of the sensing domain of AauS with the catalytic domain of EnvZ to control the expression of the ompC gene in response to acidic amino acids. Real-time quantitative PCR and GFP fluorescence studies showed increased ompC gene expression and GFP fluorescence as the concentration of acidic amino acids in- creased. These data suggest that AauS-based recombinant E. coli can be used as a bacterial biosensor of acidic amino acids. By employing the chimeric SK strategy, various bacteria biosensors for use in the development of biochemical- producing recombinant microorganisms can be constructed. Keywords: Acidic Amino Acids, Chimera Two-component System, Green Fluorescent Protein, Escherichia coli INTRODUCTION the transcription of related genes [6].
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Article
    JOURNAL OF BACTERIOLOGY, Jan. 1992, p. 619-622 Vol. 174, No. 2 0021-9193/92/020619-04$02.00/0 Copyright X 1992, American Society for Microbiology NOTES Bacteriophage T7 RNA Polymerase Travels Far Ahead of Ribosomes In Vivo ISABELLE IOST, JEAN GUILLEREZ, AND MARC DREYFUS* Laboratoire de Genetique Moleculaire (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique D1302), Ecole Normale Superieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230 Paris Cedex 05, France Received 2 July 1991/Accepted 24 October 1991 We show that in Escherichia coli at 32°C, the T7 RNA polymerase travels over the lacZ gene about eightfold faster than ribosomes travel over the corresponding mRNA. We discuss how the T7 phage might exploit this high rate in its growth optimization strategy and how it obviates the possible drawbacks of uncoupling transcription from translation. In Escherichia coli, transcription occurs simultaneously sequences and on the other by a terminator for T7 RNA with translation, and both processes are often tightly cou- polymerase (5). Because it is present as a single copy, the pled. Thus, the average rate of transcription matches that of lacZ gene can be transcribed constitutively from the very translation, even though it can theoretically be higher (3, active T7 promoter without affecting cell growth. For the lla). Moreover, in the absence of translation, transcription purpose of this study, we replaced the gene JO leader usually terminates prematurely (1). Based on in vitro stud- sequence by a synthetic DNA fragment encompassing the ies, it is believed that this coupling reflects the existence in lac operator (Fig. 1). Thereby, not only the transcription of most genes of specific pause sites where RNA polymerase the T7 gene I but also that of the target lacZ gene can be waits for the first translating ribosome (12).
    [Show full text]