Using the to Determine the Magnitude of the Inner Solar System Cataclysm and Post-Cataclysm Impact Flux

David A. Kring Visiting Scientist Lunar Exploration Initiative Lunar and Planetary Institute Houston, TX 77058

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Using the Moon to Determine the Magnitude of the Inner Solar System Cataclysm and Post-Cataclysm Impact Flux

Why is this important?

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Using the Moon to Determine the Magnitude of the Inner Solar System Cataclysm and Post-Cataclysm Impact Flux

Why is this important? ● These events resurfaced the Moon, generating the landscape that we will be exploring

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Using the Moon to Determine the Magnitude of the Inner Solar System Cataclysm and Post-Cataclysm Impact Flux

Why is this important? ● These events resurfaced the Moon, generating the landscape that we will be exploring ● Similar events resurfaced the Earth during a critical time when life was first evolving

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Using the Moon to Determine the Magnitude of the Inner Solar System Cataclysm and Post-Cataclysm Impact Flux

Why is this important? ● These events resurfaced the Moon, generating the landscape that we will be exploring ● Similar events resurfaced the Earth during a critical time when life was first evolving ● The processes affected all inner solar system planets and will affect the lunar-calibrated crater ages assigned to their surfaces

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Using the Moon to Determine the Magnitude of the Inner Solar System Cataclysm and Post-Cataclysm Impact Flux

Why is this important? ● These events resurfaced the Moon, generating the landscape that we will be exploring ● Similar events resurfaced the Earth during a critical time when life was first evolving ● The processes affected all inner solar system planets and will affect the lunar-calibrated crater ages assigned to their surfaces ● A study of these processes on the Moon will have a dramatic affect on our understanding of how the outer solar system formed

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Science Priorities for the Lunar Exploration Initiative

The Legacy –

The radiometric ages of rocks from the lunar highlands indicated the lunar crust had been thermally metamorphosed ~3.9 – 4.0 Ga. A large number of impact melts were also generated at the same time.

This effect was seen in the Ar-Ar system (Turner et al., 1973) and the U-Pb system (Tera et al., 1974). It was also preserved in the more easily reset Rb-Sr system. (Data summary, left, from Bogard, 1995.)

A severe period of bombardment was inferred:

The lunar cataclysm hypothesis.

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Science Priorities for the Lunar Exploration Initiative

Impact-Origin of Life Hypothesis

Impact-generated Hydrothermal Systems provided:

Crucibles for Pre-biotic Chemistry

Habitat for Early Evolution of Life

Long Lifetimes Active for 10,000 to several million years

How often were these systems produced on early Earth? Preliminary Apollo-era data suggest 20,000 to 40,000 times

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Ar-Ar analyses of impact melts in lunar meteorites are consistent with a cataclysmic bombardment ~3.9 – 4.0 Ga e.g., Cohen, Swindle, & Kring (2000, 2005)

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Ar-Ar analyses of impact melts in lunar meteorites are consistent with a cataclysmic bombardment ~3.9 – 4.0 Ga e.g., Cohen, Swindle, & Kring (2000, 2005)

Ar-Ar analyses of impact melts from asteroids suggest the cataclysmic bombardment affected the entire inner Solar System e.g., Bogard (1995), Kring & Cohen (2002)

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Ar-Ar analyses of impact melts in lunar meteorites are consistent with a cataclysmic bombardment ~3.9 – 4.0 Ga e.g., Cohen, Swindle, & Kring (2000, 2005)

Ar-Ar analyses of impact melts from asteroids suggest the cataclysmic bombardment affected the entire inner Solar System e.g., Bogard (1995), Kring & Cohen (2002)

Siderophile elements in Apollo impact melts suggest the impacting objects came from the Asteroid Belt e.g., Kring & Cohen (2002), Norman et al. (2006)

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Ar-Ar analyses of impact melts in lunar meteorites are consistent with a cataclysmic bombardment ~3.9 – 4.0 Ga e.g., Cohen, Swindle, & Kring (2000, 2005)

Ar-Ar analyses of impact melts from asteroids suggest the cataclysmic bombardment affected the entire inner Solar System e.g., Bogard (1995), Kring & Cohen (2002)

Siderophile elements in Apollo impact melts suggest the impacting objects came from the Asteroid Belt e.g., Kring & Cohen (2002), Norman et al. (2006)

The size distribution of craters on the Moon also suggests the impacting objects came from the Asteroid Belt e.g., Strom et al. (2005)

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Yet, we are still operating in a data poor environment…….

We need more lunar samples to determine the magnitude and duration of the bombardment.

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 What types of biogenic elements were delivered? How was the composition of the atmosphere altered?

How did impacts affect the origin of life & microbial evolution? How did impacts affect complex life (e.g., at K/T boundary)?

What are the future impact hazards? David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Nectarian and Early Imbrian Impact Basins

Impact Basin Diameter (km) Age (Ga)

Orientale 930 3.82 – 3.85 ? Schrodinger 320 Early Basins

Imbriam Imbrium 1,200 3.85 ± 0.01 300 Sikorsky-Rittenhouse 310 Hertzprung 570 3.89 ± 0.009 Serenitatis 740 3.895 ± 0.017 Crisium 1,060 3.89 ? Humorum 820 Humboldtianum 700 implying Medeleev 330 ~70 to 90 million year Nectarian Basins Korolev 440 bombardment Moscovienese 445 Mendel-Rydberg 630 Nectaris 860 3.89 – 3.91 ?

For comparison, Chicxulub’s diameter is ~180 km >1700 craters and basins 20 to >1000 km in diameter were produced David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Pre-Nectarian Basins

Impact Basin Diameter (km) Age (Ga)

Apollo 505 Grimaldi 430 Freundlick-Sharonov 600 330 Planck 325 Schiller-Zucchius 325 -Ganswindt 355 Lorentz 360 Smythii 840 Coulomb-Sarton 530 Keeler-Heaviside 780 Poincare 340 Ingenii 560 Lomonosov-Fleming 620 Nubium 690 Mutus-Vlacq 690 ? Tranquillitatis 800 Australe 880 Fecunditatis 990 Al-Khwarizmi/King 590 Pingre-Hausen 300 Werner- 500 -Kapteyn 550 Flamsteed- 570 Marginis 580 Insularum 600 Grissom-White 600 Tsiolkovskiy-Stark 700 South Pole- 2500 Procellarum 3200

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Pre-Nectarian Basins

Impact Basin Diameter (km) Age (Ga)

Apollo 505 Grimaldi 430 Freundlick-Sharonov 600 Birkhoff 330 Planck 325 Schiller-Zucchius 325 Amundsen-Ganswindt 355 Lorentz 360 Smythii 840 Coulomb-Sarton 530 Keeler-Heaviside 780 Poincare 340 Ingenii 560 Lomonosov-Fleming 620 Nubium 690 Mutus-Vlacq 690 Tranquillitatis 800 Australe 880 Fecunditatis 990 Al-Khwarizmi/King 590 Pingre-Hausen 300 Werner-Airy 500 Balmer-Kapteyn 550 Flamsteed-Billy 570 Marginis 580 Insularum 600 Grissom-White 600 Tsiolkovskiy-Stark 700 South Pole-Aitken 2500 Highest Priority Procellarum 3200

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Pre-Nectarian Basins

Impact Basin Diameter (km) Age (Ga)

Apollo 505 Grimaldi 430 Freundlick-Sharonov 600 Birkhoff 330 Planck 325 Schiller-Zucchius 325 Amundsen-Ganswindt 355 Lorentz 360 Smythii 840 Coulomb-Sarton 530 Keeler-Heaviside 780 Poincare 340 Ingenii 560 Lomonosov-Fleming 620 Nubium 690 Mutus-Vlacq 690 ? Tranquillitatis 800 Australe 880 Fecunditatis 990 Al-Khwarizmi/King 590 Pingre-Hausen 300 Werner-Airy 500 3 Balmer-Kapteyn 550 Flamsteed-Billy 570 Marginis 580 Insularum 600 Grissom-White 600 2 Tsiolkovskiy-Stark 700 South Pole-Aitken 2500 1 Procellarum 3200

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Representative Eratosthenian Craters

Impact Crater Diameter (km) Age (Ga)

Lambert 30 Reiner 30 32 Timocharis 34 Stearns 37 Manilius 39 Herschel 41 Rothmann 42 Plinius 43 Reinhold 43 44 Hainzel A 53 ? Maunder 55 Eratosthenes 58 61 Hercules 69 Werner 70 Fabricius 78 Aristoteles 87 Theophilus 100 (rayed) Pythagoras 130 Langrenus 132 (rayed) Hausen 167 (largest young crater)

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 How do we determine the impact flux?

We collect impact melt breccias. Impact Melt Breccias

Terrestrial Analogues + Apollo Examples

Kring/Space Sciences 2006 Lunar Exploration Initiative David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Copernicus Crater

Lunar Observer II

Kring/Space Sciences 2006 Lunar Exploration Initiative David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Sampling Lunar Impact Melt

Lunar Observer V • Impact melts can be collected within

• Alternatively, they can be collected from debris ejected from crater (next slides)

Kring/Space Sciences 2006 Lunar Exploration Initiative David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 Copernicus Crater

Complex Crater

Diffuse Central Peak

~95 km diameter

Kring/Space Sciences 2006 Lunar Exploration Initiative David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007 How do we collect these samples within the

exploration initiative? Science & Exploration Strategy

Capability to land anywhere on the lunar surface ● Lunar Reconnaissance Lander Series

General Dynamics Kring/Space Sciences Foster-Miller Lunar Exploration Initiative Thank you. Representative Copernican Craters

Impact Crater Diameter (km) Age (Ga) Kepler 32 Petavius B 33 Godin 35 39 (ray at A15 site?) 1.29 40 Olbers A 43 Crookes 49 51 55 (ray at A15 site?) 1.29 Taruntius 56 67 King 77 Copernicus 93 (ray at A12 site) 0.8-0.9 Tycho 85 (landslide at A17 site?) 0.1

The age of only a single large impact event, Tycho, is known during the Phanerozoic of Earth, which is the period of complex life on our planet. One cannot determine an impact rate with only a single data point. Were there pulses of activity at, say, 800 and 500 Ma?

David A. Kring/NAC Lunar Workshop/Feb 2007