DOCSLIB.ORG

Evolution's Waterloo No to Sociobiology

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Evolution's Waterloo No to Sociobiology 730 Nature Vol. 290 30 April 1981 (~OI~RESPONI)l~NCE falsified) either now, or ever or anywhere, say that was not due to historical descent in the Majority verdict the proposition "God exists". The record of larger sense of the phrase. This includes SIR - In a recent communication to Nature historical events, say the proposition natural hierarchies in both the organic and G. G. Simpson writes about a small group of "Napoleon lost the battle of Waterloo" is not inorganic worlds. Examples of natural cladists at the American Museum of Natural a metaphysical theory. Although the event hierarchies in the organic world are, of course, History that is not representative of the staff cannot be rerun, it certainly can be verified in phylogenies of both organisms and languages, as a whole (Nature 26 March, p.286). In his many different ways. Therefore the "theory of and the hierarchy of ontogeny of individual view a majority of the staff rejects cladistic or evolution" in its first meaning cannot be multicellular organisms. Th~ only example of Hennigian procedures. There are 32 called metaphysical, technically or otherwise. a natural hierarchy in the inorganic world that professional zoological systematists on the An explanation of why Napoleon lost the I know of is the hierarchy that continents staff here, not including emeriti or honorary battle of Waterloo, on the other hand, may or display through descent from common staff appointments, and 26 of these use may not be metaphysical, according to "ancestral" continents. We observe the cladistic methods in their systematic work. The whether it is based on verifiable facts or not. unfolding of ontogeny; we have detailed small, unrepresentative group referred to by An explanation based on the intervention of histories for the evolution of languages; we Simpson therefore amounts to 81 per cent of an army of angels could be called have a very good mechanism for the drifting the relevant staff. On the recommendation of metaphysical; one based on the superiority of of continents. Are we to think that the only three scientific departments, the Council of the the British and Prussian rifles may or may not other example of a natural hierarchy, the Scientific Staff, and the Awards Committee, be true, but it certainly is not metaphysical. branching relationships between species, is the trustees of the museum in 1975 gave Willi The same reasoning holds for the "theory of different in kind from the other three? Hennig its Gold Medal for distinguished evolution" in its second meaning. Second, the only alternative to the contributions to science. Administration de 1'/ndustrie, S. V. VAECK evolutionary interpretation is the assumption J.W. ATZ, C.J. COLE, N. ELDREDGE, Brussels, Belgium of a logical creator who made each species (or W.K. EMERSON, E.S. GAFFNEY, group of species, or language, or continent) to B.N. HAUGH, L.H. HERMAN, E. KIRSTEUER, SJR- As an American "cladist" and look as if it evolved. As I wish to practise M.C. McKENNA, J.G. MAISEY, C.W. MYERS, evolutionist concerned with the health of both science rather than theological metaphysics , I G. NELSON, N.J. PLATNICK, F.H. RINDGE, disciplines and the public reaction to them, I make the assumption of evolution. If I wished D.E. RoSEN, J.G. ROZEN, R.T. ScHUH, feel that some discussion of the issues raised in to practise theological metaphysics, I would C.L. SMITH, I. TATTERSALl., R.H. TEDFORD, Nature is warranted. certainly nor. conceive of a logical creator who R. WYGODZINSKY AND, R.G. ZWEIFEL The issue of creation versus evolution entails was, at the same time, tricky enough to make The American Museum of Natural History, two points, neither of which was mentioned in things look as if they evolved when they did New York, USA sufficient detail for the public readers of not. I make the assumption of evolution Nature properly to understand. First, the real without letting my hypotheses of evolutionary controversy is over whether or not the relationships (cladograms t•) my mind) be "I was there" phemonenon of evolution occurs. It does not dictated by particular theories such as neo­ SIR- Your account (Nature Apri19, p.435) of concern whether Darwin or anyone else was Darwinism. If I let neo-Darwinism dictate a a lecture I delivered "at the Rockefeller correct about the mechanisms behind the priori what relationships were possible then 1 University in New York last week" raises in phenomenon. To imply that a refutation of would be no better than the fundamentalists me the strong suspicion that your reporter did Darwinism or neo-Darwinism constitutes a who let the Bible dictate to them what is not hear what I said. This impression is refutation of evolution is like implying that a possible. E. 0. Wtt EY Museum of Natural History strengthened by the fact that the lecture he refutation of Newtonism is a refutation of and Department of Systematics & Ecology, reports was actually given in the Cornell gravitational attraction. Both conclusions University of Kansas, USA University Medical Center. 1. L. GowANS would be misconceived. Second, the issue of Medical Research Council, creationism versus evolution certainly does not London Wl, UK rest on whether Karl Popper's particular No to sociobiology Dr Gowans' suspicion is unfounded. Our philosophy of science renders both creationist SrR -The recent controversy on genes and reporter indeed heard what was said and myths and Darwinian conjectures racialism (Nature 22 January, 12, 19, 26 reported accurately that part of Dr Gowans' "untestable." There is a higher principle to February) may have some relevance to caste resolve this issue. talk concerned with the applicability of the system in India, since it has now assumed a Science is a discipline of open-minded Rothchild principle to the financing of medical great political significance and is creating inquiry which seeks to provide explanations research in Britain. The Cornell University social tensions. Although castes are manmade about the world without invoking the Medical Center is on the other side of York (all Hindus are born unequal!), and the system supernatural. Creationism as practised by Avenue in Manhattan from the Rockefeller is nowhere near as old as the human race, yet fundamentalist Christians is a close-minded University, which had advertised the meeting attempts are often made to establish a doctrine built around an ultimate source of at which Dr Gowans spoke. The two biological basis of castism in line with the truth, the Bible. Creationism is dedicated to insect societies. Wilson (in Sociobiology) has institutions run many joint seminar the proposition that the only explanations refuted any genetical basis for caste system, programmes, but are of course about "origins" are the supernatural yet willy-nilly, theoretical biology has become organisationally distinct- Editor, Nature. explanations set forth in their ultimate source a convenient and manipulative tool to disdain of truth. Thus "scientific" creationism, by or support such social practices. any standard of rational scientific philosophy, The problem will become more complex and Evolution's Waterloo is not science nor can it ever be science. Karl acute if attempts are continued to biologize SIR - While no sensible person could disagree Popper is quite aware of this and has said so in every social attribute, be it racialism, castism with your position on the "theory of Conjectures and Refutations. or nazism. Biologization may be well­ evolution" (Nature, 12 March, p.75) I think Another issue concerns what is being called intentioned, and it may well prove that some your arguments are unnecessarily weakened by "cladistics". Scientists who fall under this of our beliefs are wrong and unscientific, yet the sloppy use of words in multiple meanings, label have diverse views about the proper by this process it may generate unnecessary, enabling your opponents to confuse the issue. relationship between "cladistics" and avoidable controversies and social conflicts. The phrase "theory of evolution" for evolution. As one "out-and-out cladist" I Surely, without biologizing, one can example, is used in at least two quite different cannot imagine something less interesting than distinguish between races and racialism and meanings. At one time it means "a record of a branching diagram (cladogram) without an between castes and castism. One may dispute events in the history of the Earth", at another evolutionary interpretation. Indeed, I cannot or not give a damn if the human race is united it means "an explanation of the underlying imagine beginning a study of biogeography or divided, but one can surely condemn causes of these events". without such an interpretation. I will even racialism or castism without looking for The term "metaphysical theory" is another claim that an assumption of descent with biological evidence or defending 1he theory of example of this abuse. Popper not­ modification is necessary to do such analyses. kin select ion. Let us keep sociology and withstanding, a metaphysical theory, sensu I base my claim on two points. biology apart. B. BANERJEE stricto, is a theory which cannot be verified (or First, I have never seen a natural hierarchy Tea Research Association, Assam, India 0028·0836/ 81 / 180730·0 1.$01.00 © J98l Macmillan Journals Lid .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Biogeography and Ecology of New Guinea Edited by J.L. Gressitt Dr W
    Book reviews Biogeography and Ecology of New of documentation, analysis and interpretation is Guinea put over with a style and spirit that prevents such a Edited by J.L. Gressitt heavyweight work from becoming too stodgy. Dr W. Junk, 2 vols, US $195, DFL.450 Norman Myers The opening sentence of this splendid work sums it up: 'New Guinea is a fantastic island, unique Darwinism Defended; a guide to the and fascinating'. The largest tropical island and evolution controversies the highest island (with glaciers), it features Michael Ruse extraordinary bio-ecological diversity: some 9000 species of plants, many of them endemic; Addison Wesley, £6-95 more than 200 mammals, almost two-thirds of For a century it has been taken for granted that which are unique to the island; at least 570 birds; Darwin had solved the question to why there is a 170 lizards; 200 frogs; probably 10,000 species of myriad of species on earth. Many people now beetles, and around 20,000 species of other think otherwise and the theory of evolution by arthropods. Yet these figures, remarkable as they natural selection is under assault from several are, refer only to known and documented branches of enquiry; some philosophers think species: the numbers awaiting scientific attention that the theory is nothing more than empty could well be much greater. Along the southern rhetoric, some scientists think evolution occurs in edge of the island the climate is seasonal, thus jerks and thus negates the gradualist requirement engendering ecological variety, and the geologic of Darwin's theory and others believe that the upheavals of the recent past have induced patterns of life on earth are by the hand of an sufficient 'creative disruption' to stimulate the omniscient creator.
    [Show full text]
  • James K. Wetterer
    James K. Wetterer Wilkes Honors College, Florida Atlantic University 5353 Parkside Drive, Jupiter, FL 33458 Phone: (561) 799-8648; FAX: (561) 799-8602; e-mail: [email protected] EDUCATION UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON, Seattle, WA, 9/83 - 8/88 Ph.D., Zoology: Ecology and Evolution; Advisor: Gordon H. Orians. MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY, East Lansing, MI, 9/81 - 9/83 M.S., Zoology: Ecology; Advisors: Earl E. Werner and Donald J. Hall. CORNELL UNIVERSITY, Ithaca, NY, 9/76 - 5/79 A.B., Biology: Ecology and Systematics. UNIVERSITÉ DE PARIS III, France, 1/78 - 5/78 Semester abroad: courses in theater, literature, and history of art. WORK EXPERIENCE FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY, Wilkes Honors College 8/04 - present: Professor 7/98 - 7/04: Associate Professor Teaching: Biodiversity, Principles of Ecology, Behavioral Ecology, Human Ecology, Environmental Studies, Tropical Ecology, Field Biology, Life Science, and Scientific Writing 9/03 - 1/04 & 5/04 - 8/04: Fulbright Scholar; Ants of Trinidad and Tobago COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY, Department of Earth and Environmental Science 7/96 - 6/98: Assistant Professor Teaching: Community Ecology, Behavioral Ecology, and Tropical Ecology WHEATON COLLEGE, Department of Biology 8/94 - 6/96: Visiting Assistant Professor Teaching: General Ecology and Introductory Biology HARVARD UNIVERSITY, Museum of Comparative Zoology 8/91- 6/94: Post-doctoral Fellow; Behavior, ecology, and evolution of fungus-growing ants Advisors: Edward O. Wilson, Naomi Pierce, and Richard Lewontin 9/95 - 1/96: Teaching: Ethology PRINCETON UNIVERSITY, Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology 7/89 - 7/91: Research Associate; Ecology and evolution of leaf-cutting ants Advisor: Stephen Hubbell 1/91 - 5/91: Teaching: Tropical Ecology, Introduction to the Scientific Method VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY, Department of Psychology 9/88 - 7/89: Post-doctoral Fellow; Visual psychophysics of fish and horseshoe crabs Advisor: Maureen K.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Systems Theorizing Based on Evolutionary Psychology: an Interdisciplinary Review and Theory Integration Framework1
    Kock/IS Theorizing Based on Evolutionary Psychology THEORY AND REVIEW INFORMATION SYSTEMS THEORIZING BASED ON EVOLUTIONARY PSYCHOLOGY: AN INTERDISCIPLINARY REVIEW AND THEORY INTEGRATION FRAMEWORK1 By: Ned Kock on one evolutionary information systems theory—media Division of International Business and Technology naturalness theory—previously developed as an alternative to Studies media richness theory, and one non-evolutionary information Texas A&M International University systems theory, channel expansion theory. 5201 University Boulevard Laredo, TX 78041 Keywords: Information systems, evolutionary psychology, U.S.A. theory development, media richness theory, media naturalness [email protected] theory, channel expansion theory Abstract Introduction Evolutionary psychology holds great promise as one of the possible pillars on which information systems theorizing can While information systems as a distinct area of research has take place. Arguably, evolutionary psychology can provide the potential to be a reference for other disciplines, it is the key to many counterintuitive predictions of behavior reasonable to argue that information systems theorizing can toward technology, because many of the evolved instincts that benefit from fresh new insights from other fields of inquiry, influence our behavior are below our level of conscious which may in turn enhance even more the reference potential awareness; often those instincts lead to behavioral responses of information systems (Baskerville and Myers 2002). After that are not self-evident. This paper provides a discussion of all, to be influential in other disciplines, information systems information systems theorizing based on evolutionary psych- research should address problems that are perceived as rele- ology, centered on key human evolution and evolutionary vant by scholars in those disciplines and in ways that are genetics concepts and notions.
    [Show full text]
  • Lumsden-Wilson Theory of Gene Culture Coevolution (Human Sociobiology/Ethnography/Epigenetic Rules/Social Development) JOSEPH S
    Proc. NatL Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 78, No. 6, pp. 3976-3979, June 1981 Population Biology Lumsden-Wilson theory of gene culture coevolution (human sociobiology/ethnography/epigenetic rules/social development) JOSEPH S. ALPER* AND ROBERT V. LANGEt *Department ofChemistry, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts 02125; and tDepartment of Physics, Brandeis University, Waltham, Massachusetts 02154 Communicated by S. E. Luria, March 9, 1981 ABSTRACT A critique is presented of the Lumsden-Wilson ASSUMPTIONS OF THE THEORY theory [Lumsden, C. J. & Wilson, E. 0. (1980) Proc. Nati. Acad. Sci. USA 77, 4382-4386] of the transmission of cultural traits. An LW propose that we consider one cultural trait (called a "cul- analysis of the underlying assumptions and the mathematical na- turgen") at a time and study the mechanisms by which distri- ture of the theory clarifies its essentially reductionist and deter- butions of alternative forms of the trait in a society are estab- minist qualities. The mathematical functions governing the tran- lished. The central assumption of the LW theory is that there sition probability that an individual member of a group of a are genes that code for the rules that determine the probability specified size will switch from one trait to an alternative form of of changing from one alternative form of the trait to another. that trait is assumed to be genetically controlled although the sin- There is absolutely no evidence that any genes ofthis type exist gle independent variable of this function, the number of individ- and, as we shall argue more fully below, LW's claim that there uals characterized by each of the two forms of the trait, is envi- is evidence for the existence of such genes is invalid.
    [Show full text]
  • An Introduction to Sociobiology: Inclusive Fitness and the Core Genome Herbert Gintis
    An Introduction to Sociobiology: Inclusive Fitness and the Core Genome Herbert Gintis June 29, 2013 The besetting danger is ...mistaking part of the truth for the whole...in every one of the leading controversies...both sides were in the right in what they affirmed, though wrong in what they denied John Stuart Mill, On Coleridge, 1867 A Mendelian populationhas a common gene pool, whichis itscollective or corporate genotype. Theodosius Dobzhansky, Cold Springs Harbor Symposium, 1953. The interaction between regulator and structural genes... [reinforces] the concept that the genotype of the individual is a whole. Ernst Mayr, Populations, Species and Evolution, 1970 Abstract This paper develops inclusive fitness theory with the aim of clarifying its appropriate place in sociobiological theory and specifying the associated principles that render it powerful. The paper introduces one new concept, that of the core genome. Treating the core genome as a unit of selection solves problems concerning levels of selection in evolution. 1 Summary Sociobiology is the study of biological interaction, both intragenomic, among loci in the genome, and intergenomic, among individuals in a reproductive popula- tion (Gardner et al. 2007). William Hamilton (1964) extended the theory of gene frequencies developed in the first half of the Twentieth century (Crow and I would like to thank Samuel Bowles, Eric Charnov, Steven Frank, Michael Ghiselin, Peter Godfrey-Smith, David Haig, David Queller, Laurent Lehmann, Samir Okasha, Peter Richerson, Joan Roughgarden, Elliot Sober, David Van Dyken, Mattijs van Veelen and Edward O. Wilson for advice in preparing this paper. 1 Kimura 1970, B¨urger 2000, Provine 2001) to deal with such behavior.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociobiology Is a Controversial New Field of Study, Defined by Its Most
    28 SELFiSH GENES, AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR: A BlO-CULTURAL CRITIQUE Jon Marks Sociobiology is a controversial new field of study, defined by its most prolific spokesman as "the systematic study of thebiological basis of all social behavior" (Wilson 1975a:k). Although much excellent work has been done in this field within the areas of entomology and ornithology, the application of sociobiology to humans (Wilson 1975a:5k7ff;Wilson1975b; Hamilton 1975;etc.)has generated considerable acrimonious debate (Caplan 1978), This paper represents an attempt to present sociobiology and social anthropology fairly, and to evaluate the central arguments of sociobiology within a synthetic framework of biology and social anthropology. My purpose in this paper is to explore the foundations upon which human sociobiology is constructed; to demonstrate that human sociobiology is not so much a more scientific approach to anthropology as itis a novel philosophical ap- proach; and to evaluate critically the value of such an approach in the study of human behavior. The Genesis of Sociobiology Classical evolutionary works tended to see natural selection, and thus evolution occurring primarily with respect to the individual: the original definition of natural selection was "this preservation of indivi- dual differences and variations, and the destruction of those which are injurious" (Darwin 1962 [18721:91). However, selection also operated at higher levels: "Natural selection. ..will adapt the structure of each indi- vidual for the benefit of the community;if the community profits by the selected change" (Darwin 1962 [18721:96), With the introduction of genetics Marks 29 into evolutionary theory, this posed a problem. Evolutionary geneticists viewed evolution in terms of altered gene frequencies across generations: however, those genes are expressed in individuals, ft is the individual (i.e., the phenotype) which is exposed to the rigors of the environment, resulting in different fitnesses between individuals.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture Coevolution and the Nature of Human Sociality − Gene
    Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on February 14, 2011 Gene−culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality Herbert Gintis Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 2011 366, 878-888 doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0310 References This article cites 64 articles, 15 of which can be accessed free http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1566/878.full.html#ref-list-1 Article cited in: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/366/1566/878.full.html#related-urls Rapid response Respond to this article http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/letters/submit/royptb;366/1566/878 Subject collections Articles on similar topics can be found in the following collections behaviour (1807 articles) cognition (452 articles) ecology (2145 articles) evolution (2433 articles) Receive free email alerts when new articles cite this article - sign up in the box at the top Email alerting service right-hand corner of the article or click here To subscribe to Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B go to: http://rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org/subscriptions This journal is © 2011 The Royal Society Downloaded from rstb.royalsocietypublishing.org on February 14, 2011 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B (2011) 366, 878–888 doi:10.1098/rstb.2010.0310 Review Gene–culture coevolution and the nature of human sociality Herbert Gintis1,2,* 1Santa Fe Institute, 1399 Hyde Park Road, Santa Fe, NM 87501, USA 2Central European University, Nador u. 9, 1051 Budapest, Hungary Human characteristics are the product of gene–culture coevolution, which is an evolutionary dynamic involving the interaction of genes and culture over long time periods. Gene–culture coevolution is a special case of niche construction.
    [Show full text]
  • Culture and the Evolution Learning of Social
    ELSEVIER Culture and the Evolution of Social Learning Mark V. Flinn Department of Anthropology, University of Missouri Applications of modern evolutionary theory to human culture have generated several different theoretical approaches that challenge traditional anthropological perspectives. “Cultural selection” and “mind parasite” theories model culture as an independent evo- lutionary system because transmission of cultural traits via social learning is distinct from transmission of genes vla DNA replication. “Dual-inheritance” and “co-evolution” theories model culture as an intermediary evolutionary process that involves informa- tion from two inheritance systems: genetics and social learning. “Evolutionary psychol- ogy” theories emphasize that the evolutionary history of natural selection on mental pro- cesses links culture and biological adaptation; hence, cultural information is viewed as part of the organic phenotype and not an independent evolutionary system. Cross-cul- tural universals and scenarios of the “environment of evolutionary adaptedness” are used to identify characteristics of the “evolved mind” (human nature). “Behavioral ecol- ogy” theories examine relations between behavior and environmental context. Behav- ioral/cultural variations are viewed as products of flexible decision-making processes (evolved mind) that may respond adaptively to micro-environmental differences. It is difficult to devise empirical tests that distinguish among these theories, because they share many basic premises and make similar predictions
    [Show full text]
  • Does Biology Constrain Culture?∗
    Does Biology Constrain Culture?∗ Alan R. Rogers † Department of Anthropology University of Utah Salt Lake City, UT 84112 1988 Abstract Most social scientists would agree that the capacity for human culture was probably fash- ioned by natural selection, but they disagree about the implications of this supposition. Some believe that natural selection imposes important constraints on the ways in which culture can vary, while others believe that any such constraints must be negligible. This paper employs a “thought experiment” to demonstrate that neither of these positions can be justified by appeal to general properties of culture or of evolution. Natural selection can produce mechanisms of cultural transmission that are neither adaptive nor consistent with the predictions of acultural evolutionary models (those ignoring cultural evolution). On the other hand, natural selection can also produce mechanisms of cultural transmission that are highly consistent with acultural models. Thus, neither side of the sociobiology debate is justified in dismissing the arguments of the other. Natural selection may impose significant constraints on some human behaviors, but negligible constraints on others. Models of simultaneous genetic/cultural evolution will be useful in identifying domains in which acultural evolutionary models are, and are not, likely to be useful. Introduction The term culture means different things to different people (Kroeber and Kluckhohn 1952). At least within anthropology, however, there is consensus on one point: culture is viewed as something that we learn from each other. When individuals learn from each other, each generation may inherit the knowledge, attitudes, and behaviors of its predecessors even if these are not transmitted genetically.
    [Show full text]
  • Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature
    University of Nebraska - Lincoln DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln Anthropology Faculty Publications Anthropology, Department of August 1987 Precis of Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature Philip Kitcher University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California Patrick Bateson (Comment by) University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England Jon Beckwith (Comment by) Department of Microbiolgoy and Molecular Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass. Irwin S. Bernstein (Comment by) Department of Psychology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA Patricia Smith Churchland (Comment by) Philosophy Department and Cognitive Science Program, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, FCaliforniaollow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub See P nextart of page the forAnthr additionalopology authorsCommons Kitcher, Philip; Bateson, Patrick (Comment by); Beckwith, Jon (Comment by); Bernstein, Irwin S. (Comment by); Smith Churchland, Patricia (Comment by); Draper, Patricia (Comment by); Dupre, John (Comment by); Futterman, Andrew (Comment by); Ghiselin, Michael T. (Comment by); Harpending, Henry (Comment by); Johnston, Timothy D. (Comment by); Allen, Garland E. (Comment by); Lamb, Michael E. (Comment by); McGrew, W. C. (Comment by); Plotkin, H. C. (Comment by); Rosenberg, Alexander (Comment by); Saunders, Peter T. (Comment by); Ho, Mae-Wan (Comment by); Singer, Peter (Comment by); Smith, Eric Aiden (Comment by); Smith, Peter K. (Comment by); Sober, Elliot (Comment by); Stenseth, Nils C. (Comment by); and Symons, Donald (Comment by), "Precis of Vaulting Ambition: Sociobiology and the Quest for Human Nature" (1987). Anthropology Faculty Publications. 16. https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/anthropologyfacpub/16 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Anthropology, Department of at DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln.
    [Show full text]
  • Human Emotions: an Evolutionary Psychological Perspective
    EMR0010.1177/1754073914565518Emotion ReviewAl-Shawaf et al. Evolutionary Psychology of the Emotions 565518research-article2015 ARTICLE Emotion Review 1 –14 © The Author(s) 2015 ISSN 1754-0739 DOI: 10.1177/1754073914565518 Human Emotions: An Evolutionary er.sagepub.com Psychological Perspective Laith Al-Shawaf Daniel Conroy-Beam Kelly Asao David M. Buss Department of Psychology, The University of Texas at Austin, USA Abstract Evolutionary approaches to the emotions have traditionally focused on a subset of emotions that are shared with other species, characterized by distinct signals, and designed to solve a few key adaptive problems. By contrast, an evolutionary psychological approach (a) broadens the range of adaptive problems emotions have evolved to solve, (b) includes emotions that lack distinctive signals and are unique to humans, and (c) synthesizes an evolutionary approach with an information-processing perspective. On this view, emotions are superordinate mechanisms that evolved to coordinate the activity of other programs in the solution of adaptive problems. We illustrate the heuristic value of this approach by furnishing novel hypotheses for disgust and sexual arousal and highlighting unexplored areas of research. Keywords basic emotion, coordinating mechanisms, disgust, emotion, evolutionary psychology, sexual arousal, superordinate mechanisms Beginning with Darwin (1872/2009), evolutionary approaches even by evolutionary theorists. Differential reproductive success, to the emotions have focused on a delimited subset of psycho- not differential survival success, is the “engine” of evolution by logical phenomena. They have largely centered on emotions selection. Consequently, emotions may have evolved to solve that solve a subset of adaptive problems, carry distinctive uni- adaptive problems in a broad range of domains tributary to repro- versal signals, are universally recognized by conspecifics, and ductive success.
    [Show full text]
  • The Role of Evolutionary Explanations in Psychology
    A Natural History of Mind The role of Evolutionary explanations in psychology By Russi! Durrant A thesis submitted in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in psychology. Department ofPsychology The University of Canterbury 1998 Acknowledgements I should like to thank firstly my two supervisors Brian Haig and Jim Pollard, for their relaxed supervisory styles and their encouraging and thoughtful comments on my work. I should also like to thank all those who contributed in various ways to the completion of this project. My especial thanks to Jo, Alice, Chris, Simon, Jonnyand James. Finally, my thanks to Sco and Pat for putting everything in perspective. Contents Introduction 1 (1) Explanation, theory appraisal and the growth of science: A realist perspective 7 The aims ofscience 8 A Realist approach to science 12 Anti-realism 14 The challenge from empiricism 15 The challenge from relativism 16 The challenge from the history ofscience 18 Realism defended 19 The status of non-observables 19 The role ofsuper-empirical values 20 A closer look at the theory dependence ofobservation 22 Rescuing truth: an optimistic reappraisal of the history ofscience 25 Theory appraisal and the role of global research programmes in science 27 Scientific research programmes 29 Features ofglobal research programmes in science 35 Internal characteristics 35 External characteristics 39 Theory appraisal in science 42 Relationships between theories 50 The nature of scientific explanation 51 The received view 51 Problems with the received
    [Show full text]