Borderline Justice/States of Emergency: Orson Welles' Touch of Evil

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Borderline Justice/States of Emergency: Orson Welles' Touch of Evil Borderline Justice/States of Emergency: Orson Welles' Touch of Evil Donald E. Pease CR: The New Centennial Review, Volume 1, Number 1, Spring 2001, pp. 75-105 (Article) Published by Michigan State University Press DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/ncr.2003.0044 For additional information about this article https://muse.jhu.edu/article/50562 Access provided by The University of British Columbia Library (24 Apr 2017 02:00 GMT) Borderline Justice/ States of Emergency Orson Welles’ Touch of Evil D ONALD E. PEASE Darthmouth College T HE A NXIETY OF T RANSFERENCE Three different versions of Orson Welles’s noir classic, Touch of Evil, have been distributed internationally over a -year period. (A “director’s cut” of the film was produced in out of the -page memo Welles had written to Universal executives after viewing Harry Keller’s remake of several key scenes).1 But the film, which recounts Miguel Vargas’s decision to interrupt his honeymoon in the imaginary border town of Los Robles, with his American wife Susan, in order to investigate and thereafter to prosecute the corrupt policing practices of Hank Quinlan, has enjoyed almost no com- mercial success. Universal refused Welles editorial control over the first release and produced a -minute version of the film with little distribution. After a showing at Brussels World Fair in and a two-year run in Paris, Touch of Evil virtually went out of circulation. Touch of Evil has recouped its losses at the box office, however, through the symbolic capital it has accumulated in the academy where it has exerted an unprecedented influence in the formation and reconfiguration of various ● 75 76 ● Borderline Justice / States of Emergency academic disciplines. After a film archivist discovered a -minute version in , Stephen Heath conducted a frame-by-frame analysis of the film in two successive issues of Screen that, in consolidating film studies’ epistemo- logical rationale, significantly elevated its academic standing.2 In an essay that he published in Screen eight years later entitled “The Other Question: the Stereotype and Colonial Discourse,” Homi Bhabha detected in Heath’s argument the symptomatic features of a colonialist fantasy whose critical elaboration subsequently became crucial to the formation of post-colonial studies as an academic discipline.3 In The Cultural Front published in , Michael Denning articulated Welles’s involvement in popular front causes to what Jose David Saldivar has recently named the discourse of the Border- lands when he proposed Orson Welles’s role in “the Sleepy Lagoon Case” as the key required to decipher its political unconcious.4 The variations in the film’s academic reception have turned on the dif- ferent values that that these disparate disciplinary formations have associ- ated with the cinematic representations of the border laws which pertain at the U.S./Mexican border and the political, social, and cultural strategies mounted in opposition to them. In his pioneering work on what he has called its filmic system, Stephen Heath has proposed that the law operating within the film’s narrative should be understood to effect the resolution of the violent disruption in the order of things “with which the film opens, its containment—its replacing—in a new homogeneity.”5 After remarking that the operations of this law are encapsulated within the separation and subsequent reconciliation of Miguel Vargas and his American wife Susan, Heath arrives at the conclusion that the trajectory of their relationship constitutes the “kernel” of the ideal film narrative: “Ideally a narrative is the perfect symmetry of this movement; the kiss that the explosion postpones is resumed in the kiss of the close as Susan is reunited with Vargas—the same kiss but delayed, narrativized.”6 But upon observing that Heath’s celebration of the formal elegance of this conclusion has uncritically ratified the means whereby the filmic narra- tive has established and thereby secured the Mexican/U.S. border, Homi Bhabha interrupts Heath’s interpretation at precisely the moment in which Heath has restaged the postponed kiss. Bhabha takes issue in particular Donald E. Pease ● 77 with the following series of observations that he purports to establish the core of Heath’s argument: Vargas is the position of desire, its admission and its prohibition. Not sur- prisingly he has two names: the name of desire is Mexican, Miguel . that of the law American, Mike. The film uses the border, the play between American and Mexican . at the same time it seeks to hold that play finally in the position of purity and mixture which in turn is a version of law and desire.7 According to Bhabha, these comments reveal Heath’s wish to substitute a neocolonialist discourse that would affirm the authority of U.S. national identity in place of an analysis of the resolutely incoherent usages to which the film has put racial and cultural differences. On that basis [of Heath’s mode of analysis], it is not possible to construct the polymorphous and perverse collusion between racism and sexism as a mixed economy—for instance the discourses of American cultural colonialism and Mexican dependency, the fear/desire of miscegenation, the American border as cultural signifier of a pioneering male “American” spirit always under threat from races and cultures.8 After he refuses Heath’s claim that the film resolves the tension between the law and justice, Bhabha contends that when the unrestrained play of nation- alities at work in Touch of Evil gets articulated to the characters’ contradic- tory sexual and racial positionings, their unresolved conflict renders the divergence between law and justice irreconcilable. Unlike Heath, Bhabha reads the film’s intention to deliver Susan of her mixed sexual quality and to restore her as a pure sexual object and the effort to remove any traces of racial mixedness from Miguel Vargas as the telltale signs of the border law’s disposition to “marginalize otherness.” As a partial remedy for these interpretive shortcomings, Bhabha supple- ments Heath’s analysis with a redescription of the film’s opening scene: “If the death of the father names the interruption on which the narrative is 78 ● Borderline Justice / States of Emergency initiated,” as Bhabha articulates his revision, “it is through that death that miscegenation becomes both possible and deferred.”9 The film represents the possibility as well as the deferral of miscegenation in Miguel Vargas’s relationship with Susan. The contradictory personae through which Vargas gives expression to this complex are the effects of a process Bhabha would later call hybridization. In The Cultural Front published in , Michael Denning observed that when Welles moved the setting of the hardboiled detective novel Badge of Evil from a Southern California city to the imaginary border town of Los Robles, and when he transformed the hero into a Mexican narcotics detec- tive and the defendant into a Mexicano, the twin optics of film noir and the discourse of the borderlands brought two otherwise divided aspects of Welles’s personality—the representative of the cultural avant garde and the popular front activist—into lively interaction. In explicating the significance of this convergence of Welles’s cultural prestige with his political persona, Denning has recovered the forgotten history of a social movement which had emerged throughout the Southwest in collective resistance to the social and civic injustices that pertained at the border. Denning’s effort to remember this forgotten history entails his shifting the focus of the film’s attention away from Miguel Vargas’s relationship with Susan and onto Sheriff Hank Quinlan, whose part Welles had played in the film. Denning interprets Quinlan’s efforts to frame the migrant laborer Manolo Sanchez as a metamorphosis of Welles’s personal involvement in the 1943 Sleepy Lagoon case.10 In the case to which Denning refers, a corrupt Sheriff of the Los Angeles Police Department falsely accused a young Mexicano, Harry Leypes, along with twenty-four other Mexican-Americans, of the murder of Jose Diaz, and, in the process of investigating the case, planted evidence of their guilt. Upon ascertaining the significance of Quinlan’s corrupt implementation of border law to the film’s plot, however, Denning has also disagreed with a claim central to Bhabha’s account. Bhabha described the structure of rela- tions underwriting the neocolonial relationship between U.S. citizens and Mexican laborers as socially unjust. But Denning has associated the injus- tice that Bhabha described as a structural condition with historically specific Donald E. Pease ● 79 examples of the state’s unequal application and enforcement of immigration laws, as well as the history of the resistance movements mounted in oppo- sition to those laws. In the elaboration of this reading, Denning has opened up a space within the film that permits him to install the otherwise elided history of the paralegal tactics through which participants in this movement successfully overturned unjust border laws. More specifically, Denning has identified Miguel Vargas’s prosecution of Quinlan’s illegal framing of Manolo Sanchez with the popular front cam- paign that brought the corrupt sheriff responsible for the violation of the civil rights of Harry Leypes and the other migrant laborers to what Gloria Anzaldua has called the justice of la frontera. In making this argument, Denning has transposed Welles’s involvement with the Sleepy Lagoon case fifteen years earlier into what Joan Copjec has described as the noir film’s absent cause, which is to say the element which does not appear in the field of the film’s effects but underwrites its mise en scene as what the film desires to represent.11 I have provided this brief itinerary in order to suggest that the genealogy of the film’s reception has operated according to the logic of the transference.
Recommended publications
  • Orson Welles: CHIMES at MIDNIGHT (1965), 115 Min
    October 18, 2016 (XXXIII:8) Orson Welles: CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT (1965), 115 min. Directed by Orson Welles Written by William Shakespeare (plays), Raphael Holinshed (book), Orson Welles (screenplay) Produced by Ángel Escolano, Emiliano Piedra, Harry Saltzman Music Angelo Francesco Lavagnino Cinematography Edmond Richard Film Editing Elena Jaumandreu , Frederick Muller, Peter Parasheles Production Design Mariano Erdoiza Set Decoration José Antonio de la Guerra Costume Design Orson Welles Cast Orson Welles…Falstaff Jeanne Moreau…Doll Tearsheet Worlds" panicked thousands of listeners. His made his Margaret Rutherford…Mistress Quickly first film Citizen Kane (1941), which tops nearly all lists John Gielgud ... Henry IV of the world's greatest films, when he was only 25. Marina Vlady ... Kate Percy Despite his reputation as an actor and master filmmaker, Walter Chiari ... Mr. Silence he maintained his memberships in the International Michael Aldridge ...Pistol Brotherhood of Magicians and the Society of American Tony Beckley ... Ned Poins and regularly practiced sleight-of-hand magic in case his Jeremy Rowe ... Prince John career came to an abrupt end. Welles occasionally Alan Webb ... Shallow performed at the annual conventions of each organization, Fernando Rey ... Worcester and was considered by fellow magicians to be extremely Keith Baxter...Prince Hal accomplished. Laurence Olivier had wanted to cast him as Norman Rodway ... Henry 'Hotspur' Percy Buckingham in Richard III (1955), his film of William José Nieto ... Northumberland Shakespeare's play "Richard III", but gave the role to Andrew Faulds ... Westmoreland Ralph Richardson, his oldest friend, because Richardson Patrick Bedford ... Bardolph (as Paddy Bedford) wanted it. In his autobiography, Olivier says he wishes he Beatrice Welles ..
    [Show full text]
  • Reading in the Dark: Using Film As a Tool in the English Classroom. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 456 446 CS 217 685 AUTHOR Golden, John TITLE Reading in the Dark: Using Film as a Tool in the English Classroom. INSTITUTION National Council of Teachers of English, Urbana, IL. ISBN ISBN-0-8141-3872-1 PUB DATE 2001-00-00 NOTE 199p. AVAILABLE FROM National Council of Teachers of English, 1111 W. Kenyon Road, Urbana, IL 61801-1096 (Stock No. 38721-1659: $19.95, members; $26.95, nonmembers). Tel: 800-369-6283 (Toll Free); Web site http://www.ncte.org. PUB TYPE Books (010) Guides Non-Classroom (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC08 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS Classroom Techniques; *Critical Viewing; *English Instruction; *Film Study; *Films; High Schools; Instructional Effectiveness; Language Arts; *Reading Strategies; Units of Study IDENTIFIERS *Film Viewing; *Textual Analysis ABSTRACT To believe that students are not using reading and analytical skills when they watch or "read" a movie is to miss the power and complexities of film--and of students' viewing processes. This book encourages teachers to harness students' interest in film to help them engage critically with a range of media, including visual and printed texts. Toward this end, the book provides a practical guide to enabling teachers to ,feel comfortable and confident about using film in new and different ways. It addresses film as a compelling medium in itself by using examples from more than 30 films to explain key terminology and cinematic effects. And it then makes direct links between film and literary study by addressing "reading strategies" (e.g., predicting, responding, questioning, and storyboarding) and key aspects of "textual analysis" (e.g., characterization, point of view, irony, and connections between directorial and authorial choices) .The book concludes with classroom-tested suggestions for putting it all together in teaching units on 11 films ranging from "Elizabeth" to "Crooklyn" to "Smoke Signals." Some other films examined are "E.T.," "Life Is Beautiful," "Rocky," "The Lion King," and "Frankenstein." (Contains 35 figures.
    [Show full text]
  • Oconnor Conversations Spread
    CONVERSATIONS WITH ORSON COLLEEN O’CONNOR #86 ESSAY PRESS NEXT SERIES Authors in the Next series have received finalist Contents recognition for book-length manuscripts that we think deserve swift publication. We offer an excerpt from those manuscripts here. Series Editors Maria Anderson Introduction vii Andy Fitch by David Lazar Ellen Fogelman Aimee Harrison War of the Worlds 1 Courtney Mandryk Grover’s Mill, New Jersey, 1938 Victoria A. Sanz Travis A. Sharp The Third Man 6 Ryan Spooner Vienna, 1949 Alexandra Stanislaw Citizen Kane 11 Series Assistants Cristiana Baik Ryan Ikeda Xanadu, Florida, 1941 Christopher Liek Emily Pifer Touch of Evil 17 Randall Tyrone Mexico/U.S. Border, 1958 Cover Design Ryan Spooner F for Fake 22 Ibiza, Spain, 1975 Composition Aimee Harrison Acknowledgments & Notes 24 Author Bio 26 Introduction — David Lazar “Desire is an acquisition,” Colleen O’Connor writes in her unsettling series, Conversations with Orson. And much of desire is dark and escapable, the original noir of noir. The narrator is and isn’t O’Connor. Just as Orson is and isn’t Welles. Orson/O’Connor. O, the plasticity of persona. There is a perverse desire to be both known and unknown in these pieces, fragments of essay, prose poems, bad dreams. How to wrap around a signifier that big, that messy, spilling out so many shadows! Colleen O’Connor pierces her Orson Welles with pity and recognition. We imagine them on Corsica thanks to a time machine, her vivid imagination, and a kind of bad cinematic hangover. The hair of the dog is the deconstruction of the male gaze.
    [Show full text]
  • An Educational Guide Filled with Youthful Bravado, Welles Is a Genius Who Is in Love with and Welles Began His Short-Lived Reign Over the World of Film
    Welcome to StageDirect Continued from cover Woollcott and Thornton Wilder. He later became associated with StageDirect is dedicated to capturing top-quality live performance It’s now 1942 and the 27 year old Orson Welles is in Rio de Janeiro John Houseman, and together, they took New York theater by (primarily contemporary theater) on digital video. We know that there is on behalf of the State Department, making a goodwill film for the storm with their work for the Federal Theatre Project. In 1937 their tremendous work going on every day in small theaters all over the world. war effort. Still struggling to satisfy RKO with a final edit, Welles is production of The Cradle Will Rock led to controversy and they were This is entertainment that challenges, provokes, takes risks, explodes forced to entrust Ambersons to his editor, Robert Wise, and oversee fired. Soon after Houseman and Welles founded the Mercury Theater. conventions - because the actors, writers, and stage companies are not its completion from afar. The company soon made the leap from stage to radio. slaves to the Hollywood/Broadway formula machine. These productions It’s a hot, loud night in Rio as Orson Welles (actor: Marcus In 1938, the Mercury Theater’s War of the Worlds made appear for a few weeks, usually with little marketing, then they disappear. Wolland) settles in to relate to us his ‘memoir,’ summarizing the broadcast history when thousands of listeners mistakenly believed Unless you’re a real fanatic, you’ll miss even the top performances in your early years of his career in theater and radio.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Orson Welles' Three Shakespeare Films: Macbeth, Othello, Chimes At
    1 Orson Welles’ three Shakespeare films: Macbeth, Othello, Chimes at Midnight Macbeth To make any film, aware that there are plenty of people about who’d rather you weren’t doing so, and will be quite happy if you fail, must be a strain. To make films of Shakespeare plays under the same constraint requires a nature driven and thick-skinned above and beyond the normal, but it’s clear that Welles had it. His Macbeth was done cheaply in a studio in less than a month in 1948. His Othello was made over the years 1949-1952, on a variety of locations, and with huge gaps between shootings, as he sold himself as an actor to other film- makers so as to raise the money for the next sequence. I’m going to argue that the later movie shows evidence that he learned all kinds of lessons from the mistakes he made when shooting the first, and that there is a huge gain in quality as a consequence. Othello is a minor masterpiece: Macbeth is an almost unredeemed cock-up. We all know that the opening shot of Touch of Evil is a virtuoso piece of camerawork: a single unedited crane-shot lasting over three minutes. What is not often stressed is that there’s another continuous shot, less spectacular but no less well-crafted, in the middle of that film (it’s when the henchmen of Quinlan, the corrupt cop, plant evidence in the fall-guy’s hotel room). What is never mentioned is that there are two shots still longer in the middle of Macbeth .
    [Show full text]
  • Touch of Evil by Michael Sragow “The a List: the National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films,” 2002
    Touch of Evil By Michael Sragow “The A List: The National Society of Film Critics’ 100 Essential Films,” 2002 Reprinted by permission of the author Orson Welles’s “Touch of Evil” takes view- ers on a jolting ride through a seedy town on the U.S.–Mexico border, circa 1957. At every turn, the glamorous stars — Charlton Heston and Janet Leigh, as a de- termined Mexican prosecutor and his new American wife — come up against a cou- ple of charismatic grotesques: a baggy- pants crime boss named Grandi, played by Akim Tamiroff, and a tainted American police captain named Quinlan, played by Welles himself. Their jeopardy-riddled Charlton Heston grimaces at a bullying Orson Welles. Courtesy Library of Congress journey makes for one of the freest, riskiest, and raciest melodramas ever financed by a Hollywood sequence — one of the most influential in movie history studio. — without opening credits and with an ominous aural backdrop, including the doomed vehicle’s car radio that The picture opens with a mind-blowing traveling shot operates like a tracer in the viewer’s mind. that starts at the level of the belt-buckle and then swings left and right and up, as a quick and shadowy figure sets a When this keen-witted version opened theatrically, some time bomb and places the device in the trunk of a car. fans missed the Universal-cum-Mancini credit sequence; Continuing in one unbroken shot, the camera pulls away the hardscrabble splendor of the reediting didn’t jibe into a panoramic view of the border town of Los Robles, with their memories of the cheap-to-sublime thrills they then floats down to follow Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • XIV:8 TOUCH of EVIL (112 Minutes) 1958
    March 6, 2007: XIV:8 TOUCH OF EVIL (112 minutes) 1958 Director Orson Welles Script Paul Monash and Orson Welles, based on Whit Masterson’s novel Badge of Evil Producer Albert Zug Smith Original music Henry Mancini Cinematographer Russell Metty (uncredited director of reshots–Harry Keller) Film Editor Edward Curtiss, Walter Murch (director's cut), Aaron Stell, Virgil W. Vogel Orson Welles…Hank Quinlan Marlene Dietrich…Tanya Charlton Heston… Ramon Miguel 'Mike' Vargas Dennis Weaver…Motel Manager Janet Leigh…Susan Vargas Mercedes McCambridge…Leader of the gang Joseph Calleia…Pete Menzies Zsa Zsa Gabor…Nightclub Owner Akim Tamiroff…"Uncle Joe" Grandi Joseph Cotton…Police surgeon Joanna Cook Moore…Marcia Linnekar Keenan Wynn…Bit Part (uncredited) ORSON WELLES (George Orson Welles, 6 May 1915, Kenosha, Wisconsin— 10 October 1985, Hollywood, sometimes credited as O.W. Jeeves and G.O. Spelvin) did it all: actor, director, writer, producer, editor, cinematographer, shill for Gallo Wines. In his later years he played himself, but he got to do that only because the self he created was so interesting. His bio lists 133 acting credits, beginning as Death in the 1934 film Hearts of Death. Many of those credits were as “narrator”: he was the offscreen voice of the narrator in “Shogun” and Robin Masters “Magnum P.I.” He played some of history’s great characters: Cardinal Wolsey in A Man for All Seasons 1966, Falstaff in Chimes at Midnight 1965, Harry Lime in Third Man 1949, Cesare Borgia in Prince of Foxes 1949, and Macbeth 1948. Not one of the 28 films he directed is uninteresting and several are masterpieces, among them It’s All True (1993), The Lady from Shanghai (1948), Macbeth (1948), The Magnificent Ambersons (1942), and Citizen Kane (1941).
    [Show full text]
  • ORSON WELLES As FALSTAFF in CHIMES at MIDNIGHT
    ORSON WELLES AS FALSTAFF IN CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT “ If I wanted to get into heaven on the basis of one movie, that’s the one I would offer up. I think it’s because it is, to me, the least flawed . I succeeded more completely, in my view, with that than with anything else.” —Orson Welles “Chimes at Midnight . may be the greatest Shakespearean film ever made, bar none.” —Vincent Canby, The New York Times “ He has directed a sequence, the Battle of Shrewsbury, which is unlike anything he has ever done, indeed unlike any battle ever done on the screen before. It ranks with the best of Griffith, John Ford, Eisenstein, Kurosawa—that is, with the best ever done.” —Pauline Kael Spain • 1966 • 116 Minutes • Black & White • 1.66:1 Booking Inquiries: Janus Films Press Contact: Ryan Werner [email protected] • 212-756-8761 [email protected] • 917-254-7653 CHIMES AT MIDNIGHT JANUS FILMS SYNOPSIS The crowning achievement of Orson Welles’s later film career,Chimes at Midnight returns to the screen after being unavailable for decades. This brilliantly crafted Shakespeare adaptation was the culmination of Welles’s lifelong obsession with the Bard’s ultimate rapscallion, Sir John Falstaff, the loyal, often soused childhood friend to King Henry IV’s wayward son Prince Hal. Appearing in several plays as a comic supporting figure, Falstaff is here the main event: a robustly funny and ultimately tragic screen antihero played by Welles with towering, lumbering grace. Integrating elements from both Henry IV plays as well as Richard II, Henry V, and The Merry Wives of Windsor, Welles created an unorthodox Shakespeare film that is also a gritty period piece, which he called “a lament .
    [Show full text]
  • Welles Explores Truth in Deception NOVEMBER 20, 2015 2:04 AM0 COMMENTS by NICK SWAN
    AiA Art News-service F is for Fake: Welles Explores Truth in Deception NOVEMBER 20, 2015 2:04 AM0 COMMENTS By NICK SWAN Orson Welles’ documentary F is for Fake is as much an exploration of one filmmaker’s idiosyncratic technique, as it is a philosophical debate about authenticity and expertise. COURTESY OF SPECIALTY FILMS Released in 1974, F is for Fake is Orson Welles’ last completed film — the culmination of an extensive and acclaimed career in artistic media.The beginning of Welles’ work actually existed not in film, but rather in theatre and radio. In 1937, Welles wrote a modern adaptation of and starred in William Shakespeare’s Julius Caesar. Although it premiered in an independent theatre, Caesar was soon moved to Broadway, where it ran until 1941. Welles burst onto the radio platform when, in 1938, he delivered the infamous “War of the Worlds” broadcast. Despite its notoriety for the panic and widespread hysteria that it caused, this broadcast additionally served to exemplify and draw attention to Welles’ skills in dramatic acting and oration His talent would make him a household name a few years after the zenith of Welles’ career, Citizen Kane. Widely regarded as one of the greatest works in the history of film, Citizen Kane depicts the life of the fictional Charles Foster Kane, played by Welles. His performance in this role is marked by moments of boisterous rhetoric as well as more nuanced scenes of passionate drama. Welles also directed and co- wrote Citizen Kane; The film’s revolutionary fast-paced editing and montage segments exhibit Welles’ unique cinematic vision and would influence not only his later work, but also the technique of many future directors.
    [Show full text]
  • Touch of Evil (1958)
    The Buffalo Film Seminars 4/5/2000 Angelika 8 Theater Touch of Evil (1958) Director Orson Welles Script Paul Monash and Orson Welles, based on Whit Masterson’s novel Badge of Evil Producer Albert Zugsmith Original music Henry Mancini Cinematographer Russell Metty (uncredited director of reshots–Harry Keller) Film Editor Edward Curtiss, Walter Murch (director's cut), Aaron Stell, Virgil W. Vogel Orson Welles Hank Quinlan Marlene Dietrich Tanya Charlton Heston Ramon Migyuel 'Mike' Vargas Dennis Weaver Motel Manager Janet Leigh Susan Vargas Mercedes McCambridge Leader of the gang Joseph Calleia Pete Menzies Zsa Zsa Gabor Nightclub Owner Akim Tamiroff "Uncle Joe" Grandi Joseph Cotten Police surgeon Joanna Cook Moore Marcia Linnekar Keenan Wynn Bit Part (uncredited) ORSON WELLES (George Orson Wells, 6 May 1915, Kenosha, Wisconsin— 10 October 1985, Hollywood, sometimes Credited as O.W. Jeeves an G.O. Spelvin) did it all: actor, director, writer, producer, editor, cinematographer, shill for Gallo Wines. In his later years he played himself, but he got to do that only because the self he created was so interesting. His bio lists 133 acting credits, beginning as Death in the 1934 film Hearts of Death. Many of those credits were as “narrator”: he was the offscreen voice of the narrator in “Shogun” and Robin Masters “Magnum P.I.” He played some of history’s great characters: Cardinal Wolsey in A Man fo All Seasons 1966, Falstaff in Chimes at Midnight 1965, Harry Lime in Third Man 1949, Cesare Borgia in Prince of Foxes 1949, and Macbeth 1948. Not one of the 28 films he directed is uninteresting and several are masterpieces, among them It’s All True (1993), The Lady from Shanghai (1948), Macbeth (1948), The Magnificent Ambersons (1942), and Citizen Kane (1941).
    [Show full text]
  • Touch of Evil-5
    “TOUCH OF EVIL” (1958) Screening Salutes Production Designer Robert Clatworthy and a Film Noir Classic Art Directors Guild Film Society and the American Cinematheque Present Screening and Special Panel Sunday, June 30, 5:30 P.M. at the Aero Theatre in Santa Monica Sponsored by The Hollywood Reporter LOS ANGELES, June 6, 2013 — The Art Directors Guild (ADG) Film Society and American Cinematheque will screen the restored American version of Orson Welles’ Touch of Evil (1958), considered by many to be the last of the great film noir movies made in Hollywood, on Sunday, June 30, at the Aero Theatre in Santa Monica. Touch of Evil is a visually arresting masterpiece directed by Orson Welles and starring Welles, Charlton Heston, Janet Leigh, and Marlene Dietrich. The program, sponsored by The Hollywood Reporter, will honor the film’s legendary Oscar®-winning Production Designer Robert Clatworthy, who is a 2013 ADG Hall of Fame Inductee, for his major design contributions to this and many highly influential films. The post film panel will explore Clatworthy’s design legacy and contributions to the classic Universal Studios production style during the 1950’s – 60’s by sharing clips from Written on the Wind (1956) and That Touch of Mink (1962). ADG Film Society co-chair Thomas A. Walsh will moderate the panel discussion. “The version of Touch of Evil that is being presented is the restored American version,” says Walsh. “Orsen Welles did not have final cut on his film so this reconstruction was an attempt to restore it based on Welles’ copious notes contained in a letter to the Studio revealing his artistic intent.
    [Show full text]
  • Zum 100. Geburtstag Von Orson Welles N O D N O L
    Zum 100. Geburtstag von Orson Welles n o D n o l ’ S e l l e W n o S R o u z n e t i e b r a h e r D n e d i e b r a d o K a j o d n u s e l l e W n o s r o Die verborgenen Seiten im Werk Dimension. Das war der Moment, wo ich entweder von Orson Welles Selbstmord begehen, mein Scheitern eingestehen oder Als ich im Jahr von Orson Welles’ 100. Geburtstag (am einfach unbekümmert weitermachen konnte, und ich 6. Mai) und seinem 30. Todestag (am 10. Oktober) zu - wählte Letzteres, getreu der berühmten Replik des See - sagte, seine Biografie für meinen französischen Verle - manns in THE LADy FROM SHANGHAI: »When I start ger Éditions Bernard de Fallois zu schreiben, wurde out to make a fool of myself, there’s very little can stop meine Welles-Bewunderung nur noch von meiner Un - me.« s e l bekümmertheit übertroffen. Eine starke Erinnerung an Ich reiste nach Kroatien, um dort Orson Welles’ letzte l e seine Radiosendung »Krieg der Welten« und die fol - Lebensgefährtin und Mitarbeiterin zu treffen: Oja Kodar. W n gende Panik (die völlig anders ablief, als es heute er - Schon begann die getrocknete Blume des Herbariums o s r zählt wird), einige verloren geglaubte, wiedergefundene einen zarten Duft abzugeben, der meine Nase er - O Filme (wie das Material von TOO MUCH JOHNSON, das reichte. Der Mensch Orson Welles nahm langsam kon - 74 die Retrospektive eröffnet), selbstverständlich die Ehr - krete Konturen an: Ich war am Meer, das er betrachtet furcht vor CITIZEN KANE, den ich zu meiner Über - hatte, sah an den Wänden der Villa seine Zeichnungen raschung nur ungefähr im Gedächtnis hatte, und einige und sprach mit der Frau, die er geliebt hatte.
    [Show full text]