DOCSLIB.ORG

Emissions Data from EPA's Petroleum Refining Sector ICR Component 2

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Emissions Data from EPA's Petroleum Refining Sector ICR Component 2 Emissions data from EPA's Petroleum Refining Sector ICR Component 2 - Emission Inventory; non-CBI compiled database of all Component 2 submittals - Final Emissions Inventory Modeling File-HAP data only, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petref/petrefpg.html. STATE CITY COUNTY FACILITY NAME 2010 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (lbs.) AK Kenai Kenai Peninsula Borough Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Company Kenai Refinery 55,913.28 AK North Pole Fairbanks North Star Borough Petro Star Inc. - North Pole 2,467.58 AK North Pole Fairbanks North Star Borough Flint Hills Resources Alaska LLC. 31,145.55 AK North Slope Borough North Slope Borough ConocoPhillips Kuparuk Plant 7,429.78 AK Prudhoe Bay North Slope Borough BP Exploration (Alaska) Inc. 13,076.41 AK Valdez Valdez-Cordova Census Area Petro Star Valdez Refy 2,109.53 AL Atmore Escambia County Goodway Refining LLC 706.18 AL Saraland Mobile County Shell Chemical Company 103,180.02 AL Tuscaloosa Tuscaloosa County Hunt Refining Co. A Co.rporation 46,003.04 AR El Dorado Union County Lion Oil Company 241,699.66 AR Smackover Union County Cross Oil Refining & Marketing, Inc. 92,876.00 CA Arroyo Grande San Luis Obispo County ConocoPhillips Santa Maria Facility- Refinery 6,869.96 CA Bakersfield Kern County San Joaquin Refining Company Incorporated 16,508.14 CA Bakersfield Kern County Kern Oil & Refining Company 22,491.85 CA Bakersfield Kern County Big West Oil LLC (Prev. Shell Oil Products US) 1,714.80 CA Benicia Solano County Valero Refining Co. California Benicia Refinery 250,793.05 CA Carson Los Angeles County ConocoPhillips Carson Plant 62,759.34 CA Carson Los Angeles County BP Carson Refinery 436,371.36 CA El Segundo Los Angeles County Chevron USA Products Co. 169,551.68 CA Long Beach Los Angeles County Edgington Oil Company 1,128.81 CA Martinez Contra Costa County Tesoro Refining And Marketing 97,922.39 CA Martinez Contra Costa County Shell Oil Products US - Martinez Refinery 312,757.12 CA Paramount Los Angeles County Paramount Petroleum Corp. 4,950.83 CA Richmond Contra Costa County Chevron Products Co. Richmond Refinery 509,104.16 CA Rodeo Contra Costa County ConocoPhillips San Francisco Area Refinery At Rodeo 124,352.43 CA Santa Maria Santa Barbara County Greka Energy 329.31 CA South Gate Los Angeles County Lunday-Thagard Oil Co. 1,391.12 CA Torrance Los Angeles County Mobil Oil Corp. 225,826.21 CA Wilmington Los Angeles County Valero Wilmington Asphalt Plant 4,715.56 CA Wilmington Los Angeles County Valero Refining Co. - Wilmington (Prev. Ultramar Inc.) 237,273.12 CA Wilmington Los Angeles County Union Oil Co. Los Ang Refinery 236,266.24 CA Wilmington Los Angeles County Shell Oil Products US - Wilmington 91,041.56 CO Commerce City Adams County Suncor Denver Refinery 303,605.93 DE Delaware City New Castle County Valero Refining Co. (Prev. Motiva Enterprises LLC) 10,646.38 GA Savannah Chatham County Citgo Asphalt Refining Company 63,007.50 Emissions data from EPA's Petroleum Refining Sector ICR Component 2 - Emission Inventory; non-CBI compiled database of all Component 2 submittals - Final Emissions Inventory Modeling File-HAP data only, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petref/petrefpg.html. STATE CITY COUNTY FACILITY NAME 2010 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (lbs.) HI Kapolei Honolulu County Tesoro Hawaii Corporation Refinery-Kapolei 56,894.64 HI Kapolei Honolulu County Chevron Products Co. - Hawaii Refinery 174,170.77 IL Channahon Will County ExxonMobil-Joliet Refinery 663,297.48 IL Lemont Will County Citgo Petroleum Corp. 244,564.95 IL Robinson Crawford County Marathon Petroleum Co. LLC 590,860.22 IL Roxana Madison County ConocoPhillips Co. Wood River Refinery 692,528.51 IN Mount Vernon Posey County Countrymark Cooperative, Inc. 24,087.17 IN Whiting Lake County BP Products North America Inc., Whiting Refinery 2,909,469.12 KS Coffeyville Montgomery County Coffeyville Resources Refining & Marketing 477,368.71 KS El Dorado Butler County Frontier El Dorado Refining Company 394,584.80 KS Mc Pherson Mcpherson County National Cooperative Refinery 151,221.68 KY Catlettsburg Boyd County Marathon Ashland Petroleum/Catlettsburg 533,800.28 KY Somerset Pulaski County Somerset Refinery 407.91 LA Baton Rouge East Baton Rouge Parish Tetra Process Services Lc Exxon Ref Lacation Baton Rouge 867,567.49 LA Belle Chasse Plaquemines Parish BP Oil Company Alliance Refinery 430,684.76 LA Chalmette St. Bernard Parish ExxonMobil Refinery Complex 584,323.62 LA Convent St. James Parish Motiva Enterprises LLC/Convent Refinery 97,871.73 LA Cotton Valley Webster Parish Calumet Lubricants Co - Cotton Valley Refi 31,726.30 LA Garyville St. John The Baptist Parish Marathon Ashland Petroleum LLC 340,015.69 LA Krotz Springs St. Landry Parish Valero Refining Co./Krotz Springs Refinery 313,301.17 LA Lake Charles Calcasieu Parish Pelican Refining Company 2,053.57 LA Lake Charles Calcasieu Parish Citgo Petroleum Corporation 1,562,714.80 LA Lake Charles Calcasieu Parish Calcasieu Refining Co. 29,288.68 LA Meraux St. Bernard Parish Murphy Oil USA Inc. Meraux Terminal 312,754.42 LA Norco St. Charles Parish Valero Saint Charles Refinery 159,200.57 LA Norco St. Charles Parish Motiva Enterprises LLC - Norco Refinery 466,977.65 LA Port Allen West Baton Rouge Parish Placid Refining Co. LLC/Port Allen Refinery 498,836.40 LA Princeton Bossier Parish Calumet Lubricants Co. LP - Princeton 11,931.10 LA Shreveport Caddo Parish Calumet Shreveport Lubricants And Waxes LLC/Shreveport Refinery 211,964.79 LA Westlake Calcasieu Parish ConocoPhillips Co. - Lake Charles Refinery 400,001.84 MI Detroit Wayne County Marathon Ashland Petroleum 291,854.10 MN Rosemount Dakota County Flint Hills Resources LP 556,383.07 MN St. Paul Park Washington County Marathon Petroleum Co. LLC Saint Paul Park Refiner 147,531.36 MS Pascagoula Jackson County Chevron Texaco Products Company, Pascago 2,504,236.74 MS Sandersville Jones County Hunt Southland Refining Company 13,133.61 Emissions data from EPA's Petroleum Refining Sector ICR Component 2 - Emission Inventory; non-CBI compiled database of all Component 2 submittals - Final Emissions Inventory Modeling File-HAP data only, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petref/petrefpg.html. STATE CITY COUNTY FACILITY NAME 2010 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (lbs.) MS Vicksburg Warren County Ergon Refining Inc. 26,503.27 MT Billings Yellowstone County Exxon Billings Refinery 434,496.14 MT Billings Yellowstone County Conoco Incorporated Refinery 848,484.78 MT Great Falls Cascade County Montana Refining Company 27,186.68 MT Laurel Yellowstone County Cenex Inc. Laurel Refinery 1,930,194.16 ND Mandan Morton County Tesoro - Mandan 666,343.22 NJ Linden Union County Bayway Chemical Plant Of Infineum USA 237,344.11 NJ Paulsboro Gloucester County Valero Refining Co. 537,169.24 NJ Paulsboro Gloucester County Citgo Asphalt Refining Company 47,495.41 NJ Perth Amboy Middlesex County Chevron Products Company 3,215.88 NJ Port Reading Middlesex County Amerada Hess Corp. Packaging 61,959.58 NM Artesia Eddy County Navajo Refining Co. - Artesia 281,988.56 NM Jamestown Mckinley County Giant Refining Co. - Ciniza Refinery 66,108.60 NM Lovington Lea County Navajo Refining Co. - Lovington 5,829.60 NV Ely Nye County Eagle Springs Refinery 12,584.96 OH Canton Stark County Marathon Petroleum Company LLC, Canton Refinery 150,670.00 OH Lima Allen County Valero Refining Co. (Prev. Premcor Refining Group) 83,115.33 OH Oregon Lucas County Sunoco Inc. Toledo Refinery 154,750.88 OH Oregon Lucas County BP Oil Company Toledo Refinnery 490,504.00 OK Ardmore Carter County Valero Rfnry Co./Ardmore Rfnry 117,238.56 OK Ponca City Kay County ConocoPhillips Co. Ponca City Refi Nery 307,565.82 OK Thomas Custer County Ventura Refining & Transmission, LLC 14,876.20 OK Tulsa Tulsa County Sunoco Pipeline LP - Sunoco Ballinger - Coleman County Tx 59,982.92 OK Tulsa Tulsa County Sinclair Oil Tulsa Refining Tulsa Trucking 103,465.37 OK Wynnewood Garvin County Wynnewood Refining Co. 154,713.85 PA Bradford Mckean County American Refining Group Inc. 311,553.03 PA Marcus Hook Delaware County Sunoco Marcus Hook Ref 471,283.11 PA Philadelphia Philadelphia County Sunoco Girard Point Refinery 813,586.23 PA Trainer Delaware County ConocoPhillips Co. Trainer Refinery 140,887.56 PA Warren Warren County United Refining Co./Warren Plt 127,643.43 TN Memphis Shelby County Valero Refining Co. (Prev. Premcor Refining, Prev. Williams Refining LLC) 175,572.41 TX Baytown Harris County ExxonMobil Ref & Supply 1,309,800.89 TX Beaumont Jefferson County ExxonMobil Oil Beaumont Refinery 909,475.94 TX Big Spring Howard County Fina Oil & Chemical 123,435.56 TX Borger Hutchinson County ConocoPhillips Co. - Borger (Prev. Phillips 66 Co.) 519,622.74 Emissions data from EPA's Petroleum Refining Sector ICR Component 2 - Emission Inventory; non-CBI compiled database of all Component 2 submittals - Final Emissions Inventory Modeling File-HAP data only, http://www.epa.gov/ttn/atw/petref/petrefpg.html. STATE CITY COUNTY FACILITY NAME 2010 HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT EMISSIONS (lbs.) TX Brazoria Brazoria County Phillips 66 Company Sweeny Complex 315,165.00 TX Corpus Christi Nueces County Valero Refining Texas LP Corpus Christi East Plant 208,929.53 TX Corpus Christi Nueces County Valero Refining - Texas LP 250,555.33 TX Corpus Christi Nueces County Trigeant Ltd 1,383.80 TX Corpus Christi Nueces County Koch Refining Company 207,055.12 TX Corpus Christi Nueces County Flint Hills Resources LP - West Plant 805,131.05 TX Corpus Christi Nueces County Citgo Refining & Chemicals Co. LP 7,489.20 TX Corpus Christi Nueces County Citgo East Plant Refinery 314,368.80 TX Deer Park Harris County Shell Oil Deer Park 290,489.58 TX El Paso El Paso County El Paso Refinery 347,229.13 TX Houston Harris County Valero Refining Houston Refinery 106,444.77 TX Houston Harris County Channel Energy Energy 151,450.01 TX Pasadena Harris County Pasadena Refining System Prsi West Demolition Project 222,180.00 TX Port Arthur Jefferson County Valero Refining Co.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules 149
    Table of Contents UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K [ X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 OR [ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the transition period from to Commission File Number 1-16417 NUSTAR ENERGY L.P. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 74-2956831 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 2330 North Loop 1604 West 78248 San Antonio, Texas (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (210) 918-2000 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Common units representing partnership interests listed on the New York Stock Exchange. Securities registered pursuant to 12(g) of the Act: None. Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes [X] No [ ] Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes [ ] No [X] Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Pennsylvania's RFS Waiver Request: Separating Fact from Fiction
    Pennsylvania’s RFS Waiver Request: Separating Fact from Fiction On November 2, 2017, Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Wolf submitted a letter to Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Scott Pruitt asking that the 2017 and 2018 Renewable Fuel Standard (RFS) requirements for conventional renewable fuel be limited to no more than 9.7% of annual gasoline demand. Gov. Wolf’s letter asks for the waiver “to provide relief to refiners in Pennsylvania and elsewhere,” expresses concern about “the high cost of compliance,” and suggests the RFS threatens to “severely harm” the economy.1 The waiver request follows a letter Gov. Wolf sent to President Trump on October 20, 2017, requesting that the President direct EPA to “…waive the renewable volume obligation for Northeast refiners until or unless the market prices [for RINs] deflate.”2 Gov. Wolf continues to overlook a number of important realities regarding RIN credits and the gasoline market, factors affecting profitability in the Northeast refining sector, and the burden of proof associated with demonstrating “severe harm” and securing a waiver of RFS requirements. When these facts are properly taken into consideration, it is clear that EPA has no choice but to deny Gov. Wolf’s request for a waiver of the RFS requirements. Merchant refiners recoup their RIN costs through wholesale gasoline prices. Numerous studies—including some funded by the oil industry—have shown that merchant refiners recover their RIN costs by slightly marking up the price of gasoline blendstock sold into the wholesale
    [Show full text]
  • PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS: the End of the Line for an Economic Myth
    PORT ARTHUR, TEXAS: The End of the Line for an Economic Myth August 2017 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS This report was researched and written by Mary Greene and Keene Kelderman of the Environmental Integrity Project. THE ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT The Environmental Integrity Project (http://www.environmentalintegrity.org) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March of 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for effective enforcement of environmental laws. EIP has three goals: 1) to provide objective analyses of how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution and affects public health; 2) to hold federal and state agencies, as well as individual corporations, accountable for failing to enforce or comply with environmental laws; and 3) to help local communities obtain the protection of environmental laws. For questions about this report, please contact EIP Director of Communications Tom Pelton at (202) 888-2703 or [email protected]. PHOTO CREDITS Cover photo by Garth Lenz of Port Arthur. Executive Summary The Trump Administration’s approval of the Keystone XL Pipeline will lead to a surge in demand for oil refining at the southern end of the line, in Port Arthur, Texas – and a real test for claims that the administration’s promotion of fossil fuel industries will create jobs. The industrial port of 55,000 people on the Gulf of Mexico has been the home of America’s largest concentration of oil refineries for decades, and business has been booming. But history has shown little connection between the profitability of the petrochemical industries that dominate Port Arthur and the employment or health of the local people who live in this city of increasingly abandoned buildings and empty lots.
    [Show full text]
  • Sinclair Oil Corporation Annual Report 1955
    -X7 7 0 Q 0 Q - I f 4. Notice to Stockholders: of The Management will request proxies for the Annual Meeting that a Stockholders to be held on May 16, 1956. It is expected stock proxy statement and a form of proxy will be mailed to meeting holders on or about April 9, 1956, together with notice of and request for proxy. Sinclair Oil Corporation through subsidiaries, engages in all major functions of the oil industry-production, transportation, refining and marketing. Principal oper ating subsidiary companies are listed below, together • : :: c• i . with their primary activities and the locations of their headquarters. Unless otherwise stated, all subsidi aries are wholly owned. SINCLAIR OIL & GAS COMPANY, Tulsa, Oklahoma crude oil exploration and production in the United States. A subsidiary of this company, Sinclair Canada Oil Company conducts similar operations in the Dominion of Canada. SINCLAIR CRUDE OIL COMPANY, Tulsa, Oklahoma purchase and sale of crude oil. SINCLAIR PIPE LINE COMPANY, Independence, Kansas ownership and operation of crude oil and products pipe lines. SINCLAIR REFINING COMPANY, New York petroleum refining, product marketing and marine operations. In marketing operations, two Sinclair subsidiaries distribute under their own names in individual areas: Richfield Oil Corporation of New York, New York New England and the eastern seaboard states Hughes Oil Company, Chicago, Illinois Chicago area SINCLAIR RESEARCH LABORATORIES, INC., Harvey, Illinois and Tulsa, Oklahoma--research and development .4 SINCLAIR CHEMICALS, INC., New York petrochemical development and marketing SINCLAIR CUBA OIL COMPANY, S.A., Havana, Cuba J marketing-principally in Cuba . ^A SINCLAIR PETROLEUM COMPANY, New York exploration in Ethiopia SINCLAIR SOMAL CORPORATION, New York Somaliland exploration in Italian "NOTE:The term "Company" in this report is used interchange- 4 or any of its subsidi VENEZUELAN PETROLEUM COMPANY, New York ably to describe Sinclair Oil Corporation all (96.24% owned)--crude oil production and refining aries, individually or collectively.
    [Show full text]
  • View Annual Report
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K þ ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 Or o TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 Commission File Number 001-5424 DELTA AIR LINES, INC. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 58-0218548 (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) Post Office Box 20706 Atlanta, Georgia 30320-6001 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (404) 715-2600 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class Name of each exchange on which registered Common Stock, par value $0.0001 per share New York Stock Exchange Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes þ No o Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o No þ Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
    [Show full text]
  • Holly Energy Partners Announces Definitive Agreement with Sinclair Oil Corporation to Acquire Assets at Sinclair's Tulsa Refin
    October 20, 2009 Holly Energy Partners Announces Definitive Agreement With Sinclair Oil Corporation to Acquire Assets at Sinclair’s Tulsa Refinery Transaction in Combination with Holly Corporation’s Acquisition of Sinclair Refinery DALLAS – Holly Energy Partners, L.P. (NYSE: HEP) (“HEP”or the “Partnership”) announced today that it has entered into a definitive agreement with a subsidiary of Sinclair Oil Corporation (“Sinclair”) to purchase certain logistics and storage assets at Sinclair’s refinery located in Tulsa, Oklahoma. Holly Corporation (NYSE: HOC) (“Holly”), an affiliate of HEP that controls HEP’s general partner, is also a party to the definitive agreement and has agreed to purchase the refining assets at Sinclair’s Tulsa refinery. Under the terms of the agreement, HEP will purchase approximately 1.4 million barrels of storage as well as light products, asphalt and propane loading racks, and an associated refined product delivery pipeline for $75 million comprised of $21.5 million in cash and $53.5 million in HEP common units. The transaction is subject to customary closing conditions as well as certain regulatory conditions. In conjunction with the transaction, it is anticipated that subsidiaries of Holly and HEP will enter into a long-term contract similar to others between Holly and HEP under which Holly and HEP will agree to the fees Holly will pay for its use of the assets HEP is acquiring, including a minimum revenue commitment by Holly. HEP expects the transaction to be immediately accretive to its distributable cash flow. Matt Clifton, Chairman and CEO of HEP, said, “This acquisition represents a great opportunity for HEP.
    [Show full text]
  • CFA Institute Research Challenge Atlanta Society of Finance And
    CFA Institute Research Challenge Hosted by Atlanta Society of Finance and Investment Professionals Team J Team J Industrials Sector, Airlines Industry This report is published for educational purposes only by New York Stock Exchange students competing in the CFA Research Challenge. Delta Air Lines Date: 12 January 2017 Closing Price: $50.88 USD Recommendation: HOLD Ticker: DAL Headquarters: Atlanta, GA Target Price: $57.05 USD Investment Thesis Recommendation: Hold We issue a “hold” recommendation for Delta Air Lines (DAL) with a price target of $57 based on our intrinsic share analysis. This is a 11% potential premium to the closing price on January 12, 2017. Strong Operating Leverage Over the past ten years, Delta has grown its top-line by 8.8% annually, while, more importantly, generating positive operating leverage of 60% per annum over the same period. Its recent growth and operational performance has boosted Delta’s investment attractiveness. Management’s commitment to invest 50% of operating cash flows back into the company positions Delta to continue to sustain profitable growth. Growth in Foreign Markets Delta has made an initiative to partner with strong regional airlines across the world to leverage its world-class service into new branding opportunities with less capital investment. Expansion via strategic partnerships is expected to carry higher margin growth opportunities. Figure 1: Valuation Summary Valuation The Discounted Cash Flows (DCF) and P/E analysis suggest a large range of potential share value estimates. Taking a weighted average between the two valuations, our bullish case of $63 suggests an attractive opportunity. However, this outcome presumes strong U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • Valero Port Arthur Refinery Presents $750000 to Local Children's Charities
    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: VALERO PORT ARTHUR REFINERY PRESENTS $750,000 TO LOCAL CHILDREN’S CHARITIES Despite tournament’s cancellation, community support endures PORT ARTHUR, Texas, October 9, 2020 — The COVID-19 pandemic canceled the Valero Texas Open, like it did so many prominent events across the country, but it didn’t stop the tournament’s legacy of giving back. Business partners, sponsors and individual donors of the tournament and related events including the Valero Benefit for Children still contributed more than $14 million in net proceeds for charitable organizations across the United States, including those in the Port Arthur area. The Valero Port Arthur Refinery will distribute $750,000 to local charities with funds raised through the Valero Energy Foundation and the 2020 Valero Texas Open and Benefit for Children. “This is really positive news for our local nonprofit organizations, many of whom are facing challenges as a result of the pandemic,” said Mark Skobel, Vice President and General Manager of the Valero Port Arthur Refinery. “We know how important it is to continue supporting these agencies and the work they do for the children in our community.” The 2020 Valero Benefit for Children local recipients are: • Port Arthur Independent School District • Gulf Coast Health Center • YMCA of Southeast Texas • Communities in Schools of Southeast Texas • CASA of Southeast Texas • Southeast Texas Food Bank • Garth House, Mickey Mehaffy Children’s Advocacy Program • Richard Shorkey Education and Rehabilitation Center “We are blessed by our long-standing relationships with our tournament and Benefit for Children top sponsors,” said Joe Gorder, Valero Chairman and Chief Executive Officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Breakdowns in Air Quality Air Pollution from Industrial Malfunctions and Maintenance in Texas
    Breakdowns in Air Quality Air Pollution from Industrial Malfunctions and Maintenance in Texas APRIL 27, 2016 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Written and researched by Ilan Levin and Kira Burkhart of the Environmental Integrity Project, and Luke Metzger and Sara Smith of Environment Texas. THE ENVIRONMENTAL INTEGRITY PROJECT The Environmental Integrity Project (http://www.environmentalintegrity.org) is a nonpartisan, nonprofit organization established in March of 2002 by former EPA enforcement attorneys to advocate for effective enforcement of environmental laws. EIP has three goals: 1) to provide objective analyses of how the failure to enforce or implement environmental laws increases pollution and affects public health; 2) to hold federal and state agencies, as well as individual corporations, accountable for failing to enforce or comply with environmental laws; and 3) to help local communities obtain the protection of environmental laws. ENVIRONMENT TEXAS Environment Texas Research & Policy Center is a statewide advocacy organization bringing people together for a cleaner, greener, healthier future.www.EnvironmentTexasCenter.org For questions about this report, please contact Ilan Levin, Director of EIP’s Texas office, at (512) 637-9479 or [email protected] PHOTO CREDITS Tom Pelton/ Environmental Integrity Project. Cover photo: East of Houston Texas, near the Shell Oil Deer Park plant. Page 13 photo by Blas Espinosa. CORRECTIONS Corrections were made in this report on May 10, 2016 updating the current owner of the Flint Hills Chemical Plant in Port Arthur (Jefferson County) to Koch/Flint Hills Resources and the owner of Port Arthur Refinery in Port Arthur (Jefferson County) to Motiva Enterprises, LLC. Breakdowns in Air Quality Executive Summary Texas leads the nation in energy production.
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 C H E M I C a L C O N T a M I N a T I O N I N F
    C H E M I C A L C O N T A M I N A T I O N I N F E N C E L I N E C O M M U N I T I E S Port Arthur, Texas: Public Housing Residents Breathe Contaminated Air From Nearby Refineries and Chemical Plants By Steve Lerner Hilton Kelley grew up on the frontlines of toxic chemical exposure in the United States. Kelley, 45, a big man with a shaved head and a brown belt in Tae Kwan Do, lived for six years in the Carver Terrace public housing complex just across the fenceline from the Motiva Enterprises refinery in the West Side neighborhood of Port Arthur, Texas. To this day, Motiva’s 3,800-acre refinery remains the 800-pound gorilla on his block producing 285,000 barrels of oil a day. Refinery officials plan to expand its capacity 125 percent and produce 625,000 barrels a day making it the largest refinery in the nation. Playground at Carver Terrace The Motiva facility, jointly owned by Shell Oil Photo: Steve Lerner and Saudi Aramco, is not the only oil refinery or petrochemical plant fouling the air in this largely African-American and low-income neighborhood. Heavy emissions are also released into the air by the Valero refinery, Huntsman Petrochemical, and the Chevron Phillips plant, as well as the Great Lakes Carbon Corporation’s petroleum coke handling facility. The air is further burdened by massive releases from a major refinery owned by Total Petrochemicals USA (formerly Final Oil), Premcor Refining, as well as BASF Fina Petrochemicals located a few miles away in East Port Arthur.
    [Show full text]
  • The Value of Monroe Energy, Llc for Delta Air Lines, Inc. Amid a Bearish
    A Work Project presented as part of the requirements for the Award of a Master Degree in Finance from the NOVA – School of Business and Economics. DELTA AIR LINES, INC. FLYING HIGH IN A COMPETITIVE INDUSTRY an Equity Research Report on Delta Air Lines, Inc. (DAL: NYSE) FRANCISCO SEQUEIRA DE PAIVA MARTINS DA SILVA STUDENT NUMBER 33897 PEDRO MANUEL CORREIA PEREIRA STUDENT NUMBER 33968 A Project carried out on the Master’s in Finance Program, under the supervision of: Professor Rosário André January 3rd, 2020 Abstract This equity research report will first be focusing on the North American Arline industry, analyzing its current form, as well as looking at industry’s opportunities and threats ahead. On top of this, an outlook over the airline industry will also be presented in order to give the investors an accurate view of the present and the future. A further analysis will then be conducted with regards do Delta Air Lines Inc. (DAL:NYSE), applying the previous research to provide a fair valuation for the group, resulting in an sustained recommendation of whether an investor should consider invest in DAL, or not. Keywords Delta Air Lines, Inc.; Airline; Equity Research; Valuation This work used infrastructure and resources funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (UID/ECO/00124/2013, UID/ECO/00124/2019 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209), POR Lisboa (LISBOA-01-0145-FEDER-007722 and Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209) and POR Norte (Social Sciences DataLab, Project 22209). MASTERS IN FINANCE EQUITY RESEARCH DELTA AIR LINES, INC. COMPANY REPORT AIR TRANSPORTATION - AIRLINES JANUARY 3RD, 2020 STUDENTS: FRANCISO SILVA / PEDRO PEREIRA [email protected] / [email protected] Flying High In A Competitive Industry During the first 9-months of 2019, solid demand for air travel supported a 6.4% Recommendation: STRONG BUY growth of passenger revenue for Delta Air Lines, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Suncor Energy – Annual Report 2005
    Suncor05ARcvr 3/8/06 1:33 PM Page 1 SUNCOR ENERGY INC. 2005 ANNUAL REPORT > growing strategically Suncor’s large resource base, growing production capacity and access to the North American energy market are the foundation of an integrated strategy aimed at driving profitable growth, a solid return on capital investment and strong returns for our shareholders. A staged approach to increasing our crude oil production capacity allows Suncor to better manage capital costs and incorporate new ideas and new technologies into our facilities. production 50,000 bpd 110,000 bpd (capacity) resources Third party bitumen 225,000 bpd Mining 260,000 bpd 350,000 bpd 500,000 bpd In-situ 500,000 – 550,000 bpd OUR PLANS TO GROW TO HALF A MILLION BARRELS PER DAY IN 2010 TO 2012* x Tower Natural gas Vacuum 1967 – Upgrader 1 1998 – Expand Upgrader 1, Vacuum Tower Future downstream integrat 2001 – Upgrader 2 Other customers 2005 – Expand Upgrader 2, 2008 – Further Expansion of Upgrader 2 2010-2012 – Upgrader 3 Denver refinery ion Sarnia refinery markets To provide greater North American markets reliability and flexibility to our feedstock supplies, we produce bitumen through our own mining and in-situ recovery technologies, and supplement that supply through innovative third-party agreements. Suncor takes an active role in connecting supply to consumer demand with a diverse portfolio of products, downstream assets and markets. Box 38, 112 – 4th Avenue S.W., Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2P 2V5 We produce conventional natural Our investments in renewable wind tel: (403) 269-8100 fax: (403) 269-6217 [email protected] www.suncor.com gas as a price hedge against the energy are a key part of Suncor’s cost of energy consumption.
    [Show full text]