Don Hoch Director STATE OF WASHINGTON
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION 1111 Israel Road S.W. • P.O. Box 42650 • Olympia, WA 98504-2650 • (360) 902-8500 TDD Telecommunications Device for the Deaf: 800-833-6388 www.parks.state.wa.us
STATE ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY ACT DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE
Date of Issuance: September 8, 2020
Project Name: Penrose Point State Park Pier Replacement & ADA Improvements
Proponent: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission
Lead agency: Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission
Description of proposal: The Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission (State Parks) proposes the following marine-based and upland improvements at Penrose Point State Park.
Marine-based work includes: • full replacement of the existing fixed pier (including removal of 17 creosote-treated piles), gangway, float, and boat pumpout utilities.
Upland-based work includes: • demolition of an existing vault toilet, picnic table pads, and kiosk • construction of a concrete abutment for the pier • construction of a new comfort station and installation of associated utilities • construction of an upland retaining wall and placement of fill to raise the comfort station out of the floodplain • installation of ADA-accessible picnic table pad • installation of kiosk • construction of a vehicle turn-around • installation of concrete and gravel walkways.
Location of Proposal: Penrose Point State Park is located at 321 158th Ave SW, Lakebay, WA 98349 in Pierce County. The project site is found within Section 36, Township 21 N, and Range 1 W and tax parcel 0021364000. The approximate coordinates of the project site are: 47.258500° N lat./-122.752720° W long.
Threshold Determination: After a review of the completed environmental checklist, the lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact to the environment, nor does it need mitigation to avoid significant adverse environmental impacts. No new development or improvements will occur outside the existing,
SW Capital Program • 1111 Israel Road SW • P.O. Box 42650 • Olympia, WA 98504-2650 • (360)725-9750 Penrose Point State Park Pier Replacement & ADA Improvements DNS September 8, 2020 Page 2 of 2
previously disturbed footprint of the developed day-use area or marine facilities. The nature of the improvements, as described in the checklist, will not result in any lasting impacts to waterways, native habitat or species. This project will maintain the existing amount of impervious surface and will not significantly alter drainage patterns. Best management practices (BMPs) have been incorporated into the design to provide protection from incidental or unanticipated impacts such as sediment run-off. Lastly, the completed proposal would not pose a threat to public health or safety and there will be no impacts to cultural or historic resources.
The lead agency for this proposal has determined that it does not have a probable significant adverse impact on the environment. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030(2)(c). This decision was made after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public on request.
This DNS is issued under 197-11-340(2); the lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days from the date below. Comments must be submitted by September 24, 2020 or they may not be considered.
Responsible Official: Jessica Logan Position/Title: Environmental Program Manager Phone: (360) 902-8679 Address: 1111 Israel Rd SW | PO Box 42650 Olympia, WA 98504-2650
Date: _September 8, 2020__ Signature:
"All Washington State Parks are developed and maintained for the enjoyment of all persons regardless of age, sex, creed, ethnic origin, or physical limitations."
There is no agency SEPA appeal; however, all comments are welcome and will be thoroughly considered.
SEPA ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST
A. Background [help] 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable:
Penrose Point State Park Pier Replacement & ADA Access
2. Name of applicant:
Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission
3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person:
Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Attn: Chelsea Hamer, Environmental Planner PO Box 42650 Olympia, WA 98504-2650 (360)725-9764
4. Date checklist prepared:
July-September 2020
5. Agency requesting checklist:
Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission
6. Proposed timing or schedule (including phasing, if applicable):
Construction is anticipated to be completed during summer-fall of 2021.
7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain.
No.
8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal.
Sandstrom S. & Payne, S. (The Watershed Company). 2018. Penrose Point Eelgrass Survey Memo. Prepared for Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission.
Payne S. & Creveling, J. (The Watershed Company). 2019. Revised 2020. Wetland & Shoreline Delineation Report. Prepared for Washington State Parks & Recreation Commission.
A Biological Assessment and updated eelgrass survey are forthcoming; if these analyses identify new environmental considerations not covered in this checklist, an amemendment to this document or revised checklist will be completed as necessary.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 1 of 15
9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain.
None known.
10. List any government approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known.
Pierce County, Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Shoreline Variance, Shoreline Conditional Use Washington Department of Fish & Wildlife, Hydraulic Project Approval U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Nationwide Permit Section 106 Review & Consultation
11. Give brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project and site. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.)
Penrose Point State Park is a 237-acre marine camping park in Pierce County with nearly two miles of saltwater frontage on Mayo Cove and Carr Inlet in the lower Puget Sound. The existing marina at this park and associated upland day-use area includes a fixed wooden pier with aluminum access gangway and moorage floats with a boater pumpout. Upland facilities include a RomTec vault toilet restroom and a picnic area with tables, benches, braziers, and a fire ring.
The staff of Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission proposes improvements to the marine facilities and upland day use area at Penrose Point State Park. The intent of this project is to improve accessibility, public safety, and water quality.
Proposed marine-based work includes: • Demolition of the existing timber fixed pier (157ft by 4ft), metal gangway (40ft by 4ft), solid timber float (140ft by 12ft), including the removal of 17 creosote-treated piles • Installation of 16 steel pipe piles, new fixed pier (143ft by 8ft), aluminum gangway (90ft by 6ft), float (62ft by 12ft at landing; 60ft by 20ft at end to accommodate boater pumpout) o All proposed over-water structures will include fiberglass grated decking • Replacement of boat pumpout utilities.
Proposed upland-based work includes: • demolition of an existing vault toilet, picnic table pads, barbeque and concrete slab, and kiosk • construction of a concrete abutment for pier (20ft by 14ft) • construction of a new two-hole, flush comfort station (314SF) • installation of utilities to connect new comfort station and boat pumpout to existing septic system • construction of an upland retaining wall (70LF) and placement of fill (approx. 900CY) to raise the comfort station out of the floodplain while providing ADA-accessibility • installation of ADA-accessible picnic table and pad • installation of new kiosk, barbeque without pad, picnic tables without pads, and three benches • installation of a service vehicle turn-around (930SF) • installation of connecting ADA-accessible concrete and gravel walkways.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 2 of 15
12. Location of the proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist.
Penrose Point State Park is located at 321 158th Ave SW, Lakebay, WA 98349 in Pierce County. The project site is found within tax parcel 0021364000 and within Section 36, Township 21 N, and Range 1 W. The approximate coordinates of the project site are: 47.258500° N lat./-122.752720° W long.
B. Environmental Elements [help] 1. Earth [help] a. General description of the site (circle one):
Flat, rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous, other: ______
b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate percent slope)?
The steepest slope at the project site is approximately 30%. The upland sites proposed for improvement is relatively flat, surrounded by steep slopes.
c. What general types of soils are found on the site (e.g., clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any agricultural land of long-term commercial significance and whether the proposal results in removing any of these soils.
According to the Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey mapping application (accessed July 13, 2020), the soils on site consist primarily of Bow silt loam.
d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in the immediate vicinity? If so, describe.
There are no indications or history of unstable soils at this site.
e. Describe the purpose, type, total area, and approximate quantities and total affected area of any filling, excavation, and grading proposed. Indicate source of fill.
An approximate total quantity of 900 CY of fill is proposed for this project, including fill soil, topsoil, aggregate crushed rock, and concrete. Gravel surfacing will include approximately 1,166 SF, concrete surfacing and the restroom building will have 1,515 SF, and topsoil surfacing will include 7,319 SF.
The purpose of the fill is to raise the proposed restroom out of the floodplain and connect the proposed upland site elements to comply with ADA requirements for the new pier. The total area of the site affected by the proposed fill is approximately 10,000SF, most of which is proposed to raise the restroom out of the floodplain. The source of fill will be determined by the contractor.
f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or use? If so, generally describe.
It is possible that erosion could occur as a result of ground disturbing activities associated with this
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 3 of 15
project. Best management practices and temporary erosion control measures such as the use of silt fencing and coir logs will be implemented to minimize and avoid potential erosion during construction activities. Disturbed areas will be promptly seeded following the completion of the project; erosion control measures will remain in place until soils are stabilized.
g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (e.g., asphalt or buildings)?
The current amount of impervious surface of the site is approximately 20% and will not change as a result of the proposed project. There is approximately 2,700 SF of existing impervious surface and the proposed amount is also about 2,700 SF.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or other impacts to the earth, if any:
Best management practices and temporary erosion and sediment control (TESC) measures will be implemented to prevent and minimize potential erosion; erosion control measures will remain in place until soils are stabilized.
2. Air [help] a. What types of emissions to the air would result from the proposal during construction, operation, and maintenance when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known.
Temporary construction emissions will result from operation of construction equipment. Dust will also likely be generated during construct activities. The project itself will not produce any emissions to air. Maintenance of the completed project would produce short-term and intermittent emissions due to temporary use of construction equipment and/or vehicles.
b. Are there any off-site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe.
No.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any:
All construction equipment and vehicles will be maintained in good working order and use will be minimized to the extent required to complete the project.
3. Water [help] a. Surface Water: [help] 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year-round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into.
Yes, Penrose Point State Park has nearly two miles of water frontage on Carr Inlet and Mayo Cove in the southern Puget Sound.
2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 4 of 15
Yes, all of the proposed work will require work in, over, and adjacent to Mayo Cove in the southern Puget Sound. Please see project description (Question #11) for details.
3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material.
This project will include the removal of 17 existing creosote-treated piles that currently support the pier and floats. These will be replaced with 16 steel pipe piles. No dredging is associated with this proposal.
4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
No surface water withdrawals or diversions will be required for this proposed project.
5) Does the proposal lie within a 100-year floodplain? If so, note location on the site plan.
Yes, the proposed pier replacement and a portion of upland improvements will require work within the FEMA floodplain. See Figure 1 below.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 5 of 15
Figure 1. FEMA Floodplain Map.
6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the type of waste and anticipated volume of discharge.
No waste materials will be discharged to surface waters as a result of this proposal.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 6 of 15
b. Ground Water: [help] 1) Will groundwater be withdrawn from a well for drinking water or other purposes? If so, give a general description of the well, proposed uses and approximate quantities withdrawn from the well. Will water be discharged to groundwater? Give general description, purpose, and approximate quantities if known.
The existing well at the park will provide water for the new comfort station. Waste water will be collected within the existing sanitary septic system at the park.
2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (e.g., domestic sewage, industrial, agricultural, containing the following chemicals…, etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve.
Waste water produced from the comfort station and boater pumpout will be collected within the existing sanitary septic system at the park.
c. Water runoff (including stormwater): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including stormwater) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will this water flow into other waters? If so, describe.
The source of the runoff would be from impervious surfaces associated with the proposed upland improvements. The proposed project will not significantly affect the existing drainage patters and the amount of impervious surface will not change from what is existing. Runoff will continue to sheet flow across the lawn area of the site and to the beach as it currently does. The proposed comfort station will include a gutter system that will collect and divert water away from the building.
2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe.
No waste materials will enter ground or surface waters. Waste from the proposed flushing comfort station facility will be pumped to the existing septic system.
3) Does the proposal alter or otherwise affect drainage patterns in the vicinity of the site? If so, describe.
The proposal will not significantly affect drainage patterns. The source of runoff will be the impervious surfaces associated with the proposal which are equal to what is currently present. All runoff will continue to sheet flow as it currently does, with the exception of the roof of the 315 SF restroom building; this building will have two gutters with a downspout that drains away from the building. The water flows across the lawn on site and on to the beach. There are currently no pollution-generating surfaces and no pollution-generating surfaces will result from this proposal.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and runoff water, and drainage pattern impacts, if any:
None proposed as the project is not anticipated to affect drainage patterns, will not increase the amount of impervious surface of the site, or include pollution-generating surfaces.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 7 of 15
4. Plants [help] a. Check the types of vegetation found on the site:
☒Deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other ☒Evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other ☒Shrubs ☒Grass ☐Pasture ☐Crop or grain ☐Orchards, vineyards or other permanent crops. ☒Wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bullrush, skunk cabbage, other ☒Water plants: water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other ☐Other types of vegetation
b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered?
The project site is primarily a developed day-use area consisting of grass lawn. One 21” DBH western red cedar is proposed for removal and minor trimming of trees and brush is proposed .
c. List threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
There are no listed threatened or endangered plant species known to be on or near the site.
d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any:
All disturbed areas, aside from the proposed comfort station and walkways, will receive top soil and grass seed to restore the site to pre-project condition.
e. List all noxious weeds and invasive species known to be on or near the site.
The following noxious weeds and invasive species have been observed within the vicinity of the project site: Himalayan blackberry, English ivy, herb-Robert.
5. Animals [help] a. List any birds and other animals which have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site. Examples include:
Birds: hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, waterfowl Mammals: deer Fish: salmon, trout, herring, shellfish, surf smelt
b. List any threatened and endangered species known to be on or near the site.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 8 of 15
According to the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (USFWS) Information for Planning and Consultation (IPaC) mapping application (accessed 7/30/2020), the following species are identified as potentially occurring within the project area. Gray wolf (Canis lupus), proposed endangered North American wolverine (Gulo gulo luscus), proposed threatened Marbled murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus), threatened Streaked horned lark (Eremophila alpestris strigata), threatened Yellow-billed cuckoo (Coccyzus americanus), threatened Bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus), threatened
According to the NOAA Fisheries Protected Resources App (accessed 7/30/2020), the following ESA-listed species’ critical habitat is identified in/near Penrose Point State Park. Chinook salmon, Puget Sound ESU Bocaccio, Puget Sound/Georgia Basin DPS
c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain.
Yes, the project site is within the Pacific Flyway. This proposal will not impact this migratory route.
d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any:
This project will remove 17 creosote-treated piles from the marine environment.
e. List any invasive animal species known to be on or near the site.
No invasive animal species are known to occur on or near the project site.
6. Energy and Natural Resources [help] a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc.
Electricity will be used for heating and lighting the proposed comfort station.
b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by adjacent properties? If so, generally describe.
No.
c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to reduce or control energy impacts, if any:
The proposed comfort station will use on-demand water heaters and the entire building will not be heated, only the pipe chase during the winter months to prevent pipes from freezing.
7. Environmental Health [help] a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe.
It is possible that vehicles and equipment could spill or leak hazardous materials, primarily petroleum products (e.g., gas, oil and lubricants) during construction activities. Best management
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 9 of 15
practices, such as proper maintenance of vehicles and inspection for leaks prior to use, will be used to prevent contamination resulting from the use of vehicles and other equipment.
1) Describe any known or possible contamination at the site from present or past uses.
The Washington Department of Ecology’s Clean-up Site Search (accessed July 13, 2020) was reviewed for this location, and there is no known contamination at the project site.
2) Describe existing hazardous chemicals/conditions that might affect project development and design. This includes underground hazardous liquid and gas transmission pipelines located within the project area and in the vicinity.
None known.
3) Describe any toxic or hazardous chemicals that might be stored, used, or produced during the project's development or construction, or at any time during the operating life of the project.
Vehicles and construction equipment used for construction require petroleum products (e.g., gas, oil and lubricants). Vehicles and/or machinery may be stored at staging areas during construction periods. Their use in the project area will be short-term and temporary. Best management practices, such as regular inspection for leaks prior to use, will be implemented to prevent contamination.
4) Describe special emergency services that might be required.
No special emergency services are anticipated.
5) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental health hazards, if any:
Best management practices will be implemented to reduce and control the potential for environmental health hazards, including the proper maintenance and inspection of construction vehicles and equipment.
b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (e.g., traffic, equipment, operation, other)?
No noise in the area will affect the proposal.
2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short-term or a long-term basis (e.g., traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from the site.
Typical construction noise during daylight hours is anticipated during the implementation of the proposed project. This project will also require the use of a vibratory hammer for installation of the new steel pipe piles for the pier and floats; the vibratory hammer is anticipated to operate for approximately 75 minutes per day for three days.
3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any:
Construction noise will be temporary and will be limited to daylight hours.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 10 of 15
8. Land and Shoreline Use [help] a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? Will the proposal affect current land uses on nearby or adjacent properties? If so, describe.
Penrose Point State Park is a public recreation park and surrounding properties are residential.
b. Has the project site been used as working farmlands or working forest lands? If so, describe. How much agricultural or forest land of long-term commercial significance will be converted to other uses as a result of the proposal, if any? If resource lands have not been designated, how many acres in farmland or forest land tax status will be converted to nonfarm or non-forest use?
No.
1) Will the proposal affect or be affected by surrounding working farm or forest land normal business operations, such as oversize equipment access, the application of pesticides, tilling, and harvesting? If so, how?
No.
c. Describe any structures on the site.
This project site includes a vault toilet, kitchen shelter, a kiosk, and a pier. The rest of the park has park-associated facilities, including comfort stations, a contact station,
d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what?
Yes, the following structures are proposed for demolition/replacement: fixed pier, gangway, floats, vault toilet, and kiosk.
e. What is the current zoning classification of the site?
The zoning classification of this site is Park & Recreation (PR).
f. What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site?
The comprehensive plan designation of the site is Park & Recreation (PR).
g. If applicable, what is the current shoreline master program designation of the site?
The shoreline designation of the site is Conservancy.
h. Has any part of the site been classified as a critical area by the city or county? If so, specify.
Bow silt loam hydric soils present.
i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in the completed project?
No residences are proposed and the project will not affect the number of employees at the park.
j. Approximately how many people would the completed project displace?
None.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 11 of 15
k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, if any:
None proposed as no displacement impacts are anticipated.
l. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans, if any:
Applicable permit applications will be submitted to Pierce County to ensure that the project is compatible with existing and projected land uses and plans.
m. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts to agricultural and forest lands of long-term commercial significance, if any:
None proposed as no impacts to agricultural or forest lands are anticipated.
9. Housing [help] a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing.
No housing units are provided by this proposal.
b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing.
No housing units are eliminated by this proposal.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if any:
None proposed. No housing impacts are anticipated.
10. Aesthetics [help] a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas? What is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed?
The tallest height of any proposed structure is the proposed comfort station, measuring 13 ft tall from the ground. The exterior is primarily “Hardie” siding material.
b. What views in the immediate vicinity would be altered or obstructed?
Views from the water would be altered by the proposal, but would not be obstructed.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any:
The proposal will replace existing structures and will occur in an already developed area of the park and shoreline.
11. Light and Glare [help] a. What type of light or glare will the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur?
This proposal will not produce any light or glare.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 12 of 15
b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety hazard or interfere with views?
This proposal will not produce any light or glare.
c. What existing off-site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal?
There are no off-site sources of light or glare that may affect the proposal.
d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare impacts, if any:
None proposed as no light and/or glare impacts are anticipated as a result of this proposal.
12. Recreation [help] a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity?
Penrose Point State Park is a 237-acre marine and camping park located within Puget Sound. The park has nearly 2 miles of saltwater frontage on Mayo Cove and Carr Inlet and offers recreational opportunities including boating, crabbing, fishing, oyster harvesting, swimming, wading, wildlife viewing, picnicking, beach exploration, and provides moorage and overnight camping.
b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe.
This proposed project will temporarily close the pier and associated day-use area, including the adjacent parking lot, as it will be used as a staging area.
c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any:
Notification of closure of this area will be provided to park visitors. Penrose Point State Park offers mooring buoys and additionally provides another beach access area for recreation opportunities.
13. Historic and cultural preservation [help] a. Are there any buildings, structures, or sites, located on or near the site that are over 45 years old listed in or eligible for listing in national, state, or local preservation registers ? If so, specifically describe.
There are no buildings or structures listed on or determined eligible for a national or state register in the project area. There is one kitchen shelter near the project area that dates to approximately 1975 (the date of construction can not be confirmed but is between 1973 and 1977). There will be no project impacts to this structure, it will be avoided during construction.
b. Are there any landmarks, features, or other evidence of Indian or historic use or occupation? This may include human burials or old cemeteries. Are there any material evidence, artifacts, or areas of cultural importance on or near the site? Please list any professional studies conducted at the site to identify such resources.
Yes, petroglyph boulder 45PI48 is located in a buried position on an adjoining sandspit. However, the subsurface pre-contact site is at a sufficient physical distance that the proposed project will have no impact upon the resource.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 13 of 15
Luttrell, Charles T. (2020) Penrose Point State Park – Pier Replacement and ADA Improvements Project, Pierce County, Washington Letter Report. Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission, Olympia.
c. Describe the methods used to assess the potential impacts to cultural and historic resources on or near the project site. Examples include consultation with tribes and the department of archaeology and historic preservation, archaeological surveys, historic maps, GIS data, etc.
As referenced above, professional survey, shovel testing, and background research were completed by State Parks archeologists in advance of project construction. That investigation resulted in the relocation of site 45PI48 – its presence previously unresolved. The study was completed in consultation with the Department of Archaeology and Historic Preservation, the Squaxin Island Tribe, and the Puyallup Tribe of Indians.
d. Proposed measures to avoid, minimize, or compensate for loss, changes to, and disturbance to resources. Please include plans for the above and any permits that may be required.
There are no anticipated impacts to cultural or historic resources as a result of this proposal.
14. Transportation [help] a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site or affected geographic area and describe proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any.
This park and project area is accessible by 158th Ave SW, Lakebay, WA 98349.
b. Is the site or affected geographic area currently served by public transit? If so, generally describe. If not, what is the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop?
This site is not currently served by public transit.
c. How many additional parking spaces would the completed project or non-project proposal have? How many would the project or proposal eliminate?
This proposal will not result in any additional parking spaces.
d. Will the proposal require any new or improvements to existing roads, streets, pedestrian, bicycle or state transportation facilities, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private).
No.
e. Will the project or proposal use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe.
No.
f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project or proposal? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur and what percentage of the volume would be trucks (such as commercial and non-passenger vehicles). What data or transportation models were used to make these estimates?
No additional vehicular trips per day would be generated by the proposal.
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 14 of 15
g. Will the proposal interfere with, affect or be affected by the movement of agricultural and forest products on roads or streets in the area? If so, generally describe.
No.
h. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation impacts, if any:
None proposed as no impacts to transportation are anticipated.
15. Public Services [help] a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (e.g., fire protection, police protection, public transit, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe.
No increase in need for public services is anticipated as a result of this proposal.
b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on public services, if any.
None proposed. No impacts on public services are anticipated as a result of this proposal.
16. Utilities [help] a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other ______
b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed.
This proposal includes the installation of the following utilities. • two-inch water line to supply water to the site • one-inch water line from the comfort station to a water standpipe • one-inch water line from comfort station to pier • two-inch water line from the parking lot to pier (dry hydrants for fire suppression) • two-inch sewer force main from pump tank to septic tanks • two-inch sewer force main line from boat pumpout station on pier to pump tank • four-inch sewer gravity main line from comfort station to pump tank • three-inch conduit with circuit from comfort station to electric panel • two-inch conduit with circuit from comfort station to boat pumpout station on pier • one-inch conduit with circuit from comfort station to pump tank • one 3,000-gallon pump tank for new comfort station and boat pumpout
C. Signature [help] The above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision.
Signature: ______
Name of signee: _Chelsea Hamer______Position and Agency/Organization: _Environmental Planner, WSPRC______Date Submitted: _9/3/2020______
SEPA Environmental checklist (WAC 197-11-960) January 2018 Page 15 of 15
90%REVIEW
WASHINGTON STATE PARKS date REGION MANAGER & RECREATION COMMISSION CAPITAL PROGRAMMANAGER date LUCINDA WHALEY, CHAIR SOPHIA DANENBERG STEVE MILNER MARK.BROWN KEN BOUNDS MICHAEL LATIMER DIANA PEREZ
DON HOCH, DIRECTOR Area Manager: JOEL PILLARS
INDEX PENROSE POINT STATE PARK SHEET DESCRIPTION 1 I COVER SHEET SITE WORK PIER REPLACEMENT SITE 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN SITE 2 LOWER AREA SITE PLAN (EXISTING/DEMO) VICINITY MAP PROJECT LOCATION SITE 3 LOWER AREA SITE PLAN (SITE REVISIONS) SITE 4 LOWER AREA LAYOUT AND GRADING PLAN NORTH SITE 5 LOWER AREA UTIUTY PLAN (EXISTING/DEMO) NORTH SITE 6 LOWER AREA UTIUTY PLAN (REVISIONS) SITE 7 UPPER AREA SITE & UTILITY PLAN (EXISTING/DEMO) SITE 8 UPPER AREA SITE & UTILITY PLAN (REVISIONS) SITE 9 SEPTIC TANK AREA SITE PLAN (EXISTING/DEMO) SITE 10 SEPTIC TANK AREA SITE PLAN (REVISIONS) SITE 11 KIOSK SLAB PLAN, SECTIONS, AND DETAIL SITE 12 KIOSK ROOF DETAIL AND BRACKET DETAILS SITE 13 STAIRWAY PLAN AND SECTIONS SITE 14 DETAILS SITE 15 WATER AND SEWER DETAILS SITE 16 WATER AND SEWER DETAILS SITE 17 PUMP BASIN DETAILS COMFORT STATION cs 1 FOUNDATION PLANS (FIRST AND SECOND POURS) CS2 FOUNDATION SECTIONS CS3 FLOOR PLAN AND INTERNAL ELEVATIONS CS4 UNDER SLAB UTIUTY PLAN AND PLUMBING SCHEMATIC cs 5 ROOF PLAN CS6 ELECTRICAL PLAN, LEGEND, AND SCHEMATIC CS7 BUILDING SECTION CS8 BUILDING SECTION CS9 BUILDING SECTION cs 10 BUILDING SECTIONS r PARK OFFICE cs 11 ELEVATIONS PIER & FLOAT WORK
D ,_RESIDENCE PIER 1 PIER 2 1 ......
LATITUDE: 47° -15'-31" N 321158TH AVE. SW LAKEBAY, WA 983 49-9680 LONGITUDE: 12 2 °-45'-09 " W TOWNSHIP 21 N , RANGE1 W, SECTION 36 PIERCE COUNTY TAX PARCEL NUMBER 0021364000
CAD NO. PARKCODE-PROJECTCODE-YEAR-FILENAME DATE APP. INT. REVISIONS NO.
ACTION BY DATE DESIGNED BRL 09/04/18 DRAWN LAM 09/04/18 CHECKED (FIELD) LGL 09/04/18 CHECKED (HDQTS.)
PROJECT ENGINEER WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
PENROSE POINT STATE PARK
PIER REPLACEMENT
SITTS & HILL DEMOLITION PLAN ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL STRUCTURAL SURVEYING 4815 CENTER STREET | TACOMA, WA. 98409 C2.0 PHONE: (253) 474-9449 | FAX: (253) 474-0153 http://www.sitts-hill-engineers.com/
SCALE
SHEET 3 OF 15 PARKS FILE# CAD NO. PARKCODE-PROJECTCODE-YEAR-FILENAME DATE APP. INT. REVISIONS NO.
ACTION BY DATE DESIGNED BRL 09/04/18 DRAWN LAM 09/04/18 CHECKED (FIELD) LGL 09/04/18 CHECKED (HDQTS.)
PROJECT ENGINEER WASHINGTON STATE PARKS AND RECREATION COMMISSION
PENROSE POINT STATE PARK
PIER REPLACEMENT
SITTS & HILL SITE PLAN ENGINEERS, INC. CIVIL STRUCTURAL SURVEYING 4815 CENTER STREET | TACOMA, WA. 98409 C3.0 PHONE: (253) 474-9449 | FAX: (253) 474-0153 http://www.sitts-hill-engineers.com/
SCALE
SHEET 4 OF 15 PARKS FILE#