Transcendent Topologies

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transcendent Topologies Transcendent Topologies: Structuralism and Visual Writing tom hibbard LUNA BISONTE PRODS 2018 TRANSCENDENT TOPOLOGIES: STRUCTURALISM AND VISUAL WRITING © Tom Hibbard 2018 One and the same has lost us, one and the same has forgotten us ~ Paul Celan Cover and title page art © Jim Leftwich & John M. Bennett Book design by C. Mehrl Bennett & Tom Hibbard ISBN 978-1-938521-45-4 www.johnmbennett.net https://www.lulu.com/lunabisonteprods LUNA BISONTE PRODS 137 Leland Ave. Columbus, OH 43214 USA This collection of prose writings is respectfully dedicated to my cousin, Bill Dawes. TABLE OF CONTENTS Logos, Discourse, Daring, and the Geneology of the Visible (on Jim Leftwich, De Villo Sloan) ….……1 Writing on the Wall: Koppany, Hungary, and The Economy of Form………………………………………………9 Luc Fierens, Iconography and Flexibility, Is Mankind Burning…………………………………………..….…….…15 Reed Altemus, Planck and The Unblemished Logos of Transformation…………………………………...……19 Nico Vassilakis, Language as the Structure of Being…..…………………………………………………….……………21 David-Baptiste Chirot L’Amour Marxist, Presence in The Ontological Epoch…………………………………..25 Rain on Foreground-Background Street (on Guy Beining)………………………….………………………………….33 Difference, Diversity and The Infinite Trace.………………………………………………………………………………….37 Karl Kempton and “The Enigma of the Other”..………………………………………………………….………………….43 Visual Writing: Consciousness and Existence.…………………………………………………….………………………….51 Repetition and Variation: John M. Bennett, Quantum Difference & The Topographies of Meaning..57 The Land of Freedom: Michael Basinski’s HEKA……………………………………………………………..……………..67 Literature Nation, Maria Damon and Miekal And.……………………………………….…………………………………71 Freud and Visual Writing XTANT4……………………………………………………………….………………………………...79 Return of the Darkness: Vernon Frazer’s Avenue Noir.…………………………………………….…………………….83 Winter Imprint (on Wordsworth, Judith Goldman, and Jacques Derrida)……………………………………...87 Emile Nolde: Journey In Black.……………………………………………………………………………………………………….93 Visual Writing, Derrida and The Unreadable Being of The Dead Sea Scrolls……………………..……………97 Derek White and Wendy Collin Sorin: P.S. At Least We Died Trying……………………….…………………….105 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..………..109 Afterword by Jim Leftwich…………………………………………………………………………………………………………..111 LOGOS, DISCOURSE, DARING AND THE GENEALOGY OF THE VISIBLE: ATTEMPTING A STRAIGHTFORWARD INTRODUCTION “The physical world does not merely display arbitrary regularities; it is ordered in a very special manner.” - Paul Davies In Rethinking Globalism, Manfred Steger, in his introductory chapter writes, “Globalization researchers have increasingly turned toward historical issues, raising the particular question of whether globalization is primarily a modern phenomenon or a process that has unfolded for millennia.” As civilization begins a new millennium, it seems that consideration of these sorts of questions is worthwhile. What does the temporal vantage at this particular moment amidst the generations of humankind reveal to us, if anything, about the directions in which we are collectively traveling? What sorts of measurements, themes, finitudes, alterations are we able to detect? Examining the evolution of conceptualities and categories assesses the basic progress of various fields of study and especially revisions and advances in ways human beings think. Usually progress in specific fields of study parallels a general thematic progress in social patterns and philosophical understanding. Recently, certain influential writings have together demonstrated a sense of a new philosophical perspective under such headings as Postmodernism, Quantum Science, Relativity, Climate Change, Structuralism, Globalism. This perspective is found in such writings as Michel Foucault’s Madness and Civilization (1961, first published in a complete edition in English 2006), Emmanuel Levinas’ Totality and Infinity (1961), Henri Lefebvre’s Critique of Everyday Life Vol. II (1961), Jean Baudrillard’s The Illusion of the End (first published in the U.S. 1992), Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s anti-Oedipus (1972), Roland Barthes’ S/Z (1970), Gaston Bachelard’s The Poetics of Space (1958) and many more. But this new perspective, loosely outlined, could also include such books as Loren Eiseley’s Unexpected Universe (1964), Werner Heisenberg’s Physics and Philosophy (1958) and environmental writings such as James Lovelock’s Gaia (1979), Vandana Shiva’s Earth Democracy (2005) and Thomas Berry’s The Great Work (1999). All of these writers and works more or less share the use of such memes as, from Deleuze, “rarified nature of…space,” “unusual movements,” “new dimensions,” “revolutionary thresholds.” And not only is each statement in this way inseparable from a multiplicity that is both “rare” and regular, but each statement is itself a multiplicity, not a structure or a system. (1) In the reviews in this collection, the intent is an examination of certain artworks in the light of what is considered basically Structuralist terminology. But in most of the discussions here, the real engine of new terminologies and “a new way of thinking” is the variety of unprecedented spinning 1 vantages and viewpoints from which our planet imposes a radically unfamiliar, disorienting set of parameters. No longer do we have simple clear-cut frames of reference of up and down, north and south, winter and summer, but, rather, we have gravitational and nongravitational, finite and infinite, invisible and visible, the same and the Other, the Self and the Other, linear and nonlinear, Classical and Structural (or Quantum). We have incomprehensible measurements of contra- dictory phenomena about which we are able only to speculate and extrapolate as, for now, we remain infinitely alone in incomplete worlds where we have no strictly rational way of proving their existence. Foucault’s historical approach, in which he focuses on the ways speculative ideas “open up” evolving knowledge toward advanced strategies and more effective methodologies of caring, is greatly illuminating. He shows the way in which abstract study and thought come to manifest themselves as innovative visibility or visibilities, buildings and organizations, needed and beneficial in serving society. Foucault portrays this absorbing type of development in separate texts concerning three different well-recognized sectors of society: medicine, mental health and sexuality. Foucault’s Semiotext(e) tract The Politics of Truth also makes use of the historical approach. One of the most interesting fields of study today, in which Structuralism most certainly is relevant, is the search for the origins of the universe—a subject Foucault does not broach but many others do. Also, the search for the origins and meaning of language is a parallel area of consideration, in which the application of Structuralist ideas provides insightful questions and answers. Emmanuel Levinas speaks of “this bond between expression and responsibility, this ethical condition” that is “the essence of language.” With Levinas, heterogeneity and multiplicity are the condition of existence. Invisibility and visibility remain connected. Only allowing the Other brings the Self into being. Deleuze, discussing Foucault, states much the same thing. “The subject who sees is himself a place within visibility.” In the same way Levinas connects “expression and responsibility,” Deleuze connects “the articulable and the visible.” Visibility is the ultimate achievement of the complex discourse of Structuralism and globalism. Present or past, the visible is like the articulable: they are the object not of a phenomenology but of an epistemology. (2) Visibilities are not defined by sight but are complexes of actions and passions, actions and reactions, multisensorial examples, which emerge into the light of day. (3) Visual writing is not detachment from meaning, nor is it proof of the end of history. Rather, visual writing is an interrogation of “silence and response” as evidence of the relevance of the invisible and the imaginary. It is not an agenda but a means of perceiving a radically fundamental notion of reality. Visual writing is the result of a prolonged search for “presence” in an incomprehensible, infinite universe. Thus begins our study of the new art form of “visual writing.” 2 The Encoded Logos Around 1930, in England, the philosopher Ludwig Wittgenstein wrote: “Language is of interest to me as a phenomenon and not as a means to a particular end.” Although this is an early indication of the transformation language was undergoing at that time, others had done quite a bit of thinking on the subject somewhat earlier. In 1911, Ezra Pound, along with a new generation of artists, writers, musicians, sailed from U.S. shores to Europe to begin the journey of “modern poetry” and Modernism. With the idea of Imagism, Pound introduced into writing several important notions in terms of poetry that remain influential to this day, these notions being such things as vibrant factuality, no unnecessary words, fragmentation, artistic and historical types of composition and symbolic interactions and settings. The word “Imagism” first appeared in Pound’s introduction to his own book of poems, Riposts (1912). In Cathay (1915), ostensibly a collection of Chinese translations, Pound for all practical purposes introduced the idea of “objective correlatives.” This idea is captured in his brief 1913 poem In a Station of the Metro In a Station of the Metro The apparition of these faces in the crowd;
Recommended publications
  • The Title of This Paper Is ༾
    IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities Volume 4 – Issue 2 – Autumn 2017 The Title of This Paper Is ༛◌༾༶◌༙༑༒ On Asemic Writing and the Absence of Meaning Law Alsobrook Virginia Commonwealth University in Qatar Doha, Qatar Abstract Asemic writing is a wordless form of textual communication, with semantically open content left to the reader’s interpretation. By contrast, graphic designers are taught to conceive of text as image in order to compound meaning through graphic representation and typographic nuance. Graphic designers consider the linguistic container beyond its semantic substance, in effect, and attempt to expand the sematic load of language with visual modulation. Analogously, in Empire of Signs, Roland Barthes contemplates Japanese culture as a series of signs that exist in relative ataraxia with their signifying instance, where the alliance of sign and signification mingle as meditative components in a relative yin-yang balance as exemplified by the society within which they exit as philosophical constants. For Barthes, this notion confronts a Western temperament wherein a Platonic ideal seems to foment a continual search for the existence of pre-eminent signs that function as pinnacles of signification. However, when signs are devoid of intentional meaning, what can we glean from the mechanics of sign operations that attempt to establish and create, especially with regards to visual narrative and the heterotopic and temporal devices used by writers, artists and designers, a sense of “otherness?” This paper examines the heterotopic relationship of asemic writing as a mediated agent of narrative in our post-literate society. Key words: asemic, narrative, otherness, hypermediacy, heterotopia 5 IAFOR Journal of Arts & Humanities Volume 4 – Issue 2 – Autumn 2017 Introduction As a child, I loved the Sunday comics; a supplemental section of the weekend newspaper devoted to games, trivia, and of course, cartoons.
    [Show full text]
  • The Modernist Studies Association Conference 2018 “Graphic Modernisms” Hilton Columbus Downtown Columbus, OH November 8-11, 2018
    The Modernist Studies Association Conference 2018 “Graphic Modernisms” Hilton Columbus Downtown Columbus, OH November 8-11, 2018 Statement on Transgender Inclusion The Modernist Studies Association affirms and stands in support of the rights and dignity of our transgender and gender non-binary members and all other persons associated with our organization and conference. We believe that inclusivity, diversity, access, and equality are critical to the strength of our organization and the effectiveness of our academic mission. We are committed to maintaining a welcoming and inclusive organization where everyone can be their full self. This goal includes the practice of using individuals’ preferred name and pronoun reference when introducing speakers or citing their work or ideas. Special Events Plenary Sessions Plenary Session 1: A Conversation with Joe Sacco Thursday, 7:00pm - 8:15 pm Joe Sacco is an acclaimed graphic journalist and author of Palestine and Footnotes in Gaza, on the Israel-Palestine conflict, and Safe Area Gorazde and The Fixer, on the Bosnian War. He’s lived in Malta and the U.S., and has published additional pieces on blues music, war crimes, and Chechen refugees. His work has won the American Book Award, a Guggenheim Fellowship, and the Eisner Award. His recently published collaboration with Matt Hern and Am Johal, Global Warming and the Sweetness of Life, explores ecology and climate change in the tar sands region of Canada. Joe Sacco will be interviewed by Jared Gardner, Professor of English at Ohio State University and author of Projections: Comics and the History of 21st-century Storytelling (2012), The Rise and Fall of Early American Magazine Culture (2012), and Master Plots: Race and the Founding of an American Literature 1787-1845 (1998).
    [Show full text]
  • No Longer a Horizon, but Infinity”
    Suheyla Takesh INTRODUCTION: “No Longer a Horizon, but Infinity” In 1964 the Algerian weekly Révolution africaine published “Éléments pour un art nouveau” (Elements for a New Art), an essay by the painter Mohammed Khadda that contended with the role of the artist in post-independence Algeria and in the formation of a socialist state.1 In the text, Khadda argued for a function of art beyond propaganda or agitation.2 The history of painting, he wrote, had been one of successive revolutions and of a continuous liberation that eventually culminated in the emergence of abstraction, allowing painting to become an art unto itself, no longer reliant on a physical subject. In Khadda’s account, the birth of abstract art was tied to the moment Wassily Kandinsky created “the first nonrepresentational work” in 1910—most likely a reference to Untitled (Study for Composition VII, Première abstraction).3 Whether or not we attribute the beginning of abstraction to Kandinsky’s watercolor alone, discussing it prompted Khadda to make compelling observations about abstraction’s potential. “There was no longer a horizon, but infinity,” he wrote.4 Transcending the limits of represen- tation, of physical reality, and thereby the bounds of a metaphorical “horizon,” the artist would be able—in Khadda’s imagination—to tap into an infinite range of “creative” experiences and expand what art could achieve.5 The promise of nonobjective abstraction, purporting, as it does, values of multiplicity, plurality, and heterogeneity, would be to encourage a more genuine expression of individ- uality than had been hitherto possible. The place from which Khadda’s thoughts emerged is one that is shared across geographies of decolonization: a breaking away from the entrenched colonial vision and a questioning of what it means to formulate a distinct national identity.
    [Show full text]
  • Asemic Writing: Recent History and Ongoing Research Jim Leftwich
    asemic writing: recent history and ongoing research jim leftwich ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Jim Leftwich, Jan 27, 1998 (to Tim Gaze): A seme is a unit of meaning, or the smallest unit of meaning (also known as a sememe, analogous with phoneme). An asemic text, then, might be involved with units of language for reasons other than that of producing meaning. Tim Gaze preface to The Oxygen of Truth The word “asemic” means “having no semantic content.” November, 1999 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| from Wikipedia Asemic writing is a wordless open semantic form of writing. The word asemic means "having no specific semantic content". 1) Asemic writing is a wordless open semantic form of writing. When did asemic writing become wordless? Who made the decision? Why was it important for this kind of writing to be without words? Does the person who made this decision know that the definition is historically inaccurate? 2) The word asemic means "having no specific semantic content". When did the word "specific" get added to this definition? Who made the decision to add it? Why was it important that the semantic content not be specific? In this context, how is asemic writing different from polysemous writing, or ambiguous writing? Would it not be more accurate to define "asemic" as "having no semantic content"? Jim Leftwich 07.09.2015 ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||| Google Groups, ASEMIC On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 12:38 PM, Jim Leftwich <[email protected]> wrote: ​ ​ there is no such thing as asemic writing. in fact, there is no such thing as asemic anything. everything is readable, ie., can be and will be given meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Text Panel Taking Shape
    Taking Shape: Abstraction from the Arab World, 1950s–1980s Grey Art Gallery, New York University January 14–April 4, 2020 Main Text Panel and Individual Object Labels Main Text Panel Taking Shape: Abstraction from the Arab World explores mid-20th-century abstract art from North Africa, West Asia, and the Arab diaspora—a vast geographic expanse that encompasses diverse cultural, ethnic, linguistic, and religious backgrounds. Comprising nearly 90 works by artists from countries including Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Qatar, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the exhibition is drawn from the collection of the Barjeel Art Foundation based in Sharjah, UAE. The paintings, sculpture, drawings, and prints on view here reflect the wide range of nonfigurative art practices that flourished in the Arab world over the course of four decades. Decolonization, the rise and fall of Arab nationalisms, socialism, rapid industrialization, wars and mass migrations, and the oil boom transformed the region during this period. With rising opposition to Western political and military involvement, many artists adopted critical viewpoints, striving to make art relevant to their own locales. New opportunities for international travel and the advent of circulating exhibitions sparked cultural and educational exchanges that exposed them to multiple modernisms—including various modes of abstraction—and led them to consider their roles within an international context. The featured artists—a varied group of Arab, Amazigh (Berber), Armenian, Circassian, Jewish, Persian, and Turkish descent—sought to localize and recontextualize existing 20th-century modernisms, some forming groups to address urgent issues. Moving away from figuration, they mined the expressive capacities of line, color, and texture.
    [Show full text]
  • SPRING 2019 Coursebook
    SCHOOL COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY OF THE ARTS SPRING 2019 Coursebook Workshops Seminars Lectures Master Classes Updated: February 13, 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF COURSES BY DAY AND TIME WORKSHOPS 1 SEMINARS 2 LECTURES 5 MASTER CLASSES 6 COURSE DESCRIPTIONS SEMINARS 7 Translations Workshops 24 Hybrid Forms Lab 26 LECTURES 27 MASTER CLASSES 31 SPECIAL PROJECTS WORKSHOP 41 WORKSHOPS FICTION – OPEN (6 points) FICTION – THESIS (9 points)* Lynn Steger Strong Sam Lipsyte Tue., 10am-1pm Mon., 12:05pm-3:05pm Charles Bock Joshua Furst Tue., 12:05pm-3:05pm Mon., 3:10pm-6:10pm Paul La Farge Rivka Galchen Tue., 5:15pm-8:15pm Mon., 3:10pm-6:10pm Eli Gottlieb Ben Marcus Wed., 12:35pm-3:35pm Tue., 1:05pm-4:05pm Gary Shteyngart Binnie Kirshenbaum Wed., 3:40pm-6:40pm Wed., 3:40pm-6:40pm Anelise Chen Paul Beatty Fri., 10am-1pm Thu., 1:05pm-4:05pm Elissa Schappell Thu., 1:35pm-4:35pm Ben Metcalf Thu., 4:40pm-7:40pm POETRY – OPEN (6 points) NONFICTION – OPEN (6 points) Lynn Melnick Leslie Jamison Mon., 12:05pm-3:05pm Mon., 10am-1pm Major Jackson Morgan Jerkins Tue., 10am-1pm Mon., 10am-1pm Mark Bibbins Phillip Lopate Fri., 1:10pm-4:10pm Mon, 1:05pm-4:05pm Lis Harris POETRY – THESIS (9 points)* Tue., 1:05pm-4:05pm Richard Locke Alan Gilbert Tue., 2:10pm-5:10pm Tue., 4:30pm-7:30pm Michael Greenberg Dorothea Lasky Tue., 4:15pm-7:15pm Tue., 4:30pm-7:30pm Meghan Daum Timothy Donnelly Wed., 12:35pm-3:35pm Thu., 4:10pm-7:10pm Mitchell Jackson Shane McCrae Thu., 10am-1pm Thu., 10am-1pm *Second-Years only SEMINARS ——MONDAY—— ——TUESDAY—— Rob Spillman (FI) Monica Ferrell
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibition Didactics
    Taking Shape Abstraction from the Arab World, 1950s–1980s This exhibition explores mid-twentieth-century abstract art from North Africa, West Asia, and the Arab diaspora—a vast geographic expanse that encompasses diverse cultural, ethnic, linguistic, and religious backgrounds. Comprising nearly ninety works by artists from countries including Algeria, Egypt, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Qatar, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), the exhibition is drawn from the collection of the Barjeel Art Foundation based in Sharjah, UAE. The paintings, sculpture, drawings, and prints on view here reflect the wide range of nonfigurative art practices that flourished in the Arab world over the course of four decades. Decolonization, the rise and fall of Arab nationalisms, socialism, rapid industrialization, wars and mass migrations, and the oil boom transformed the region during this period. With rising opposition to Western political and military involvement, many artists adopted critical viewpoints, striving to make art relevant to their own locales. New opportunities for international travel and the advent of circulating exhibitions sparked cultural and educational exchanges that exposed artists to multiple modernisms—including various modes of abstraction—and led them to consider their roles within an international context. The artists featured in this exhibition—a varied group of Arab, Amazigh (Berber), Armenian, Circassian, Jewish, Persian, and Turkish descent—sought to localize and recontextualize existing twentieth-century modernisms, some forming groups to address urgent issues. Moving away from figuration, they mined the expressive capacities of line, color, and texture. Inspired by Arabic calligraphy, geometry, and mathematics, Islamic decorative patterns, and spiritual practices, they expanded abstraction’s vocabulary—thereby complicating its genealogies of origin and altering the viewer’s understanding of nonobjective art.
    [Show full text]
  • Issue Eight April 2017 (Poetry, Fiction & Art) SONIC BOOM
    SONIC BOOM ... for writing that explodes Issue eight April 2017 (Poetry, Fiction & Art) SONIC BOOM …for writing that explodes Issue Eight April 2017 (Poetry, Fiction & Art) Founder/Chief Editor: Shloka Shankar Poetry Editor: Shobhana Kumar Webmaster: Dwarakanathan Ravi Proofreader: Dishika Iyer Cover Art: ‘Five Birds’ by Phil Openshaw Copyright © Sonic Boom 2017 All rights revert to the authors/artists upon publication. For re-prints in future, please credit Sonic Boom as the original publisher. Works may not be reproduced in any manner or form without prior consent from the individual artists. http://sonicboomjournal.wixsite.com/sonicboom CONTENTS EDITORIAL 5 THE POETRY SHACK 6-17 The Year of the Dragon by Amber D. Tran 7 Underwater attraction by Eddie Donoghue 8 Theodicy by Gary Glauber 9 What Is Death? by Jennifer Met 10 A Sonnet from 555 by John Lowther 11 Story by Matt Dennison 12-13 Painting Diego’s Feet by P. C. Vandall 14 Pair of Dice by Robert Beveridge 15 Shopping for Pomelos at Central Market on Chinese New Year by Robert Flinn 16 Ida Sessions, Method Actress by Todd Mercer 17 PAPER LANTERNS 18-25 Michael Stinson Helen Buckingham Jay Friedenberg William Scott Galasso Ben Moeller-Gaa 19 Hansha Teki Marietta McGregor Elmedin Kadric Helen Buckingham Marianne Paul 20 David J. Kelly Nika Johannes S. H. Bjerg Christina Sng S. M. Kozubek Billy Antonio 21 Gabriel Bates Johannes S. H. Bjerg Hansha Teki Tom Montag David J. Kelly 22 Michael Dylan Welch Maeve O’Sullivan Elmedin Kadric Susan Beth Furst Gregory Longenecker Robert Kingston 23 Elmedin Kadric Marilyn Fleming Gabriel Bates Jennifer Hambrick Hansha Teki 24 Maria Corado Mark Gilbert Jennifer Hambrick Peter Jastermsky Susan Burch Marianne Paul 25 FICTION 26-31 Kenosis by Hansha Teki 27 Crowd Control by Jennifer Hernandez 28 A Discussion in Form by Jennifer Met 29 Keyholes by Johannes S.
    [Show full text]
  • Text for the Potential Uncovering of More Framing Poems
    Text for the Potential Uncovering of More Framing Poems Despite the fact that so many literary journals advertising their consideration of poetics in any form (experimental, edgy [sic], odd, visual) don’t, in fact, want anything to do with such poetry, it stands that the amount of work being created at this time which engages the possible limits of poetry, which hangs around the intersection of borderblur, is quite significant in mass. Whatever the quality of the work turns out to be, once it has spread through the veins of the creative class via print, or more likely websites and social media, if it has been presented as poetry, it is. That’s the way it works now. Very egalitarian. The breadth of permissiveness is both exciting and dulling. It means, at least in theory, the possibility of accessing formal approaches and territories of content without limit. That said, as I stand in my backyard and look down admiringly at my daughter’s chalk drawings/ writing/ scrawls I can’t conceive of any vast difference between her work and many other visual practices by poets and/or visual artists. Consider asemic writing, a practice in which the creator produces a text which does not engage an alphabet or other system of regulated symbols, but which, at least in theory, contains its content in the physicality of the mark, in the act of writing itself. Now, I remember, as a child, or at least I believe I remember, the act of writing and drawing before I had sufficient skill to produce the agreed upon symbols which transmit meaning.
    [Show full text]
  • Semiotic Review
    Semiotic Review 2: Monsters - article published March 2016 https://semioticreview.com/ojs/index.php/sr/article/view/25 Text, Image, Asemic: “Reading” Luigi Serafini’s Codex Seraphinianus as Paratextual Metalepsis Kane X. Faucher [email protected] Abstract: The task of this article is to situate the Codex Seraphinianus in a series of multiple frames, not least of which being that of the teratological (following Italo Calvino), but also that of the pre-linguistic or post-writing frame of asemic text. This combination is less a convergence of disparate themes, but rather a disciplined parallel reading with some intriguing points of overlap and intersection. It is my hope that bringing the asemic and teratological together that it may generate insights germane to both. Ultimately, however, we still must ask if the Codex can be read as a cipher (concealed meaning), or if it is truly asemic and thus “unreadable” in any conventional or systematic sense. Keywords: Luigi Serafini, Codex Seraphinianus, paratext, metalepsis “An order always and already concerns prior orders, which is why ordering is redundancy” (Deleuze and Guattari 1987, p.75) The task of this article is to situate the Codex Seraphinianus in a series of multiple frames, not least of which being that of the teratological (following Italo Calvino), but also that of the pre-linguistic or post-writing frame of asemic text. This combination is less a convergence of disparate themes, but rather a disciplined parallel reading with some intriguing points of overlap and intersection. It is my hope that bringing the asemic and teratological together that it may generate insights germane to both.
    [Show full text]
  • Collaborative Calligraphy: an Asemic Writing Performance
    Liminalities: A Journal of Performance Studies Vol. 13, No. 2 (2017) Collaborative Calligraphy: An Asemic Writing Performance Roland Buckingham-Hsiao Keywords: Chinese calligraphy (中國書法), performance writing (書寫藝術行為表演), asemic writing (非語意書寫), collaboration (協同), language game (語文遊戲). Have the idea in your head before you take up the brush. Design the composition only af- ter you have thoroughly considered it. Be very careful with the general shape and the spac- ing, and do not let the character tilt sideways. […] Do not spoil a character by over- pliancy, nor cause discomfort by imbuing it with quarrelsome feeling. Let all four sides be evenly proportioned and all parts co-ordinated. Short and long strokes must be calculated in relation to one another, and a compromise effected between the coarse and the fine. […] The animation and spirit of a character depend largely upon its proportioning. — Ou Yang Xun (歐陽詢) (557-641).1 1 Ou Yang Xun, The Book of Calligraphy, qtd. in Yee, Chinese Calligraphy, 145. ISSN: 1557-2935 <http://liminalities.net/13-2/calligraphy.pdf> Roland Buckingham-Hsiao Collaborative Calligraphy When one shews someone the king in chess and says: “This is the king”, this does not tell him the use of this piece—unless he already knows the rules of the game up to this last point... — Ludwig Wittgenstein (1889-1951).2 Background My research is concerned with Chinese calligraphy in a globalised context, ex- amining, among other things, the areas of signification available to non-readers of Chinese. In C.S. Pierce’s terms such
    [Show full text]
  • Art and Self Discovery the Call and Response of Making Art
    Georgia State University ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University Art and Design Theses Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design 8-11-2015 Art and Self Discovery The Call and Response of Making Art Cindy A. Taylor Georgia State University Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/art_design_theses Recommended Citation Taylor, Cindy A., "Art and Self Discovery The Call and Response of Making Art." Thesis, Georgia State University, 2015. https://scholarworks.gsu.edu/art_design_theses/197 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Ernest G. Welch School of Art and Design at ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. It has been accepted for inclusion in Art and Design Theses by an authorized administrator of ScholarWorks @ Georgia State University. For more information, please contact [email protected]. ART AND SELF DISCOVERY THE CALL AND RESPONSE OF MAKING ART by CYNTHIA A. TAYLOR Under the Direction of Melanie Davenport, PhD ABSTRACT This arts-based research study grows out of the examination of a lifelong practice of art making I dub Call and Response. Gaining insight through the research and exploration of doodling, automatic drawing and other surrealist techniques and ideas about perception, I not only better understood the development of my creative processes and strengthened my artistic voice, but learned how these practices could be beneficial in teaching and learning the visual arts in the k-12 classroom. INDEX WORDS: Call and Response, Automatism, Doodles, Archetypes, Perception, Pareidolia ART AND SELF DISCOVERY THE CALL AND RESPONSE OF MAKING ART by CYNTHIA A. TAYLOR A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Art Education in the College of Arts and Sciences Georgia State University 2015 Copyright by Cynthia A.Taylor 2015 ART AND SELF DISCOVERY THE CALL AND RESPONSE OF MAKING ART by CYNTHIA A.
    [Show full text]