DOCSLIB.ORG

UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Re-Inventing Hoodia

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Re-Inventing Hoodia UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA Los Angeles Re-inventing Hoodia: Patent Law, Epistemic Citizenship, and the Making of Difference in South Africa A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree Doctor of Philosophy in Women’s Studies by Laura Ann Foster 2012 © Copyright by Laura Ann Foster 2012 ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION Re-inventing Hoodia: Patent Law, Epistemic Citizenship, and the Making of Difference in South Africa by Laura Ann Foster Doctor of Philosophy in Women’s Studies University of California, Los Angeles, 2012 Professor Sandra Harding, Chair This dissertation examines the patenting of biological materials derived from Indigenous San peoples’ knowledge of Hoodia gordonii in Southern Africa. Contributing to feminist science studies, transnational feminisms, and feminist socio-legal studies, this research asks how differences of gender, race, and indigeneity shape and are shaped by struggles over patent ownership, access and benefit sharing, and commercial bioprospecting. In particular, it conducts an ethnographic account of how Hoodia gordonii circulates and changes meaning through colonial botanical sciences, patent law rules, ethno-pharmaceutical research, and benefit sharing. This produces understandings of how Hoodia gordonii and Indigenous San peoples’ knowledge and identity are-co-produced, while new modes of citizenship are emerging. It argues that Hoodia patent law struggles produce difference and inequality, while engendering potential pathways for Indigenous San economic and political recognition, through two inter-related processes. One is through the oscillation of elastic nature/culture binaries as ii Hoodia (and San identities) are re-invented through various discursive formations. The nature/culture binary is an important conceptual analytic. Feminist scholars have shown how women, people of color, and Indigenous peoples have historically been constructed as closer to nature and thus excluded from culture. This project shows how individuals and groups making claims for rights (e.g., patent ownership, benefit sharing contracts, and bioprospecting permits) deploy, disrupt, and/or refigure nature/culture binaries through narratives of indigeneity, race, and gender. Second is through the emergence of new expressions of what I call “epistemic citizenship.” This refers to the ways in which privileges and responsibilities are being granted in unequal ways based upon whose knowledge matters most to neoliberal economies. To be sure, citizenship has always been linked to knowledge and power. Yet, this research contends that lines of inclusion and exclusion within the nation-state are being drawn in new ways through the expanding regulation and control of knowledge. iii This dissertation of Laura Ann Foster is approved. Richard L. Abel Carole Browner Christine A. Littleton Sandra Harding, Committee Chair University of California, Los Angeles 2012 iv DEDICATION PAGE This dissertation is dedicated to the many San men and women who continue to struggle for rights of self-determination. v TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF FIGURES ........................................................................................................................ x ACKNOWLEDGMENTS ............................................................................................................. xi VITA............................................................................................................................................ xiv Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 1 I. Inquiry and Synopsis ............................................................................................................ 3 II. Contextualizing Hoodia....................................................................................................... 6 III. Theoretical Interventions ................................................................................................... 8 A. Biopolitics ..................................................................................................................... 8 B. Difference.................................................................................................................... 14 C. Citizenship................................................................................................................... 20 IV. Dissertation Overview ..................................................................................................... 26 V. Locating the San................................................................................................................ 33 A. Practices of Naming.................................................................................................... 34 B. Colonial Representations............................................................................................. 36 C. Apartheid Representations .......................................................................................... 40 D. San Governance .......................................................................................................... 42 E. San Identity and Development .................................................................................... 46 VI. Conclusion ....................................................................................................................... 48 Chapter One. Situating Feminisms, Patent Law, and the Public Domain .................................... 49 I. Conceptions of the Public Domain..................................................................................... 57 A. Open Public Domain................................................................................................... 60 B. Hybridized Public Domain.......................................................................................... 67 C. Protective Public Domain............................................................................................ 82 D. Egalitarian Public Domains ........................................................................................ 94 II. Situated Public Domains ................................................................................................. 126 III. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 137 vi Chapter Two. Studying Hoodia: A Feminist Ethnographic Account of the Circulations of Hoodia gordonii.......................................................................................................................... 139 I. Multi-sited, Ethnographic Research of Circulations ........................................................ 144 A. Multi-sited Ethnographies and New Legal Realism ................................................. 144 B. Personal and Professional Circulations..................................................................... 146 C. Tracing the Circulations of Hoodia........................................................................... 149 D. Challenges to Conventional Ethnographic, Socio-legal, and Science Studies Methods..................................................................................................................... 150 II. Opening up the “Data” .................................................................................................... 166 A. Fracturing and Suturing Data through Coding Practices .......................................... 167 B. Memo Writing, Reflexivity, and Ethnographic Fieldnotes....................................... 169 C. Situational Maps........................................................................................................ 173 III. Theoretical/Methodological Frameworks...................................................................... 176 A. Science and Technology Studies–Feminist Science Studies .................................... 177 B. Socio-legal Studies: Critical Race Theory and Feminist Legal Theory.................... 182 IV. Conclusion ..................................................................................................................... 201 Chapter Three. Encountering Hoodia: The Historical Construction and Classification of Hoodia gordonii in Relation to the San ...................................................................................... 203 I. Encountering Hoodia........................................................................................................ 206 A. Producing Colonial Science...................................................................................... 208 B. Co-producing Stapeliads and San Bushmen ............................................................. 212 C. Authoring, Discovering Hoodia ................................................................................ 215 II. Classifying Hoodia.......................................................................................................... 221 A. Recording the Hoodia Genus .................................................................................... 225 B. Expanding the Hoodia Genus.................................................................................... 229 III. Molecularizing Hoodia .................................................................................................. 236 A. Molecular Styles of Thought..................................................................................... 237 B.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • What Is So Special About Intangible Property? the Case for Intelligent Carryovers Richard A
    University of Chicago Law School Chicago Unbound Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics Economics 2010 What Is So Special about Intangible Property? The Case for intelligent Carryovers Richard A. Epstein Follow this and additional works at: https://chicagounbound.uchicago.edu/law_and_economics Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Richard A. Epstein, "What Is So Special about Intangible Property? The asC e for intelligent Carryovers" (John M. Olin Program in Law and Economics Working Paper No. 524, 2010). This Working Paper is brought to you for free and open access by the Coase-Sandor Institute for Law and Economics at Chicago Unbound. It has been accepted for inclusion in Coase-Sandor Working Paper Series in Law and Economics by an authorized administrator of Chicago Unbound. For more information, please contact [email protected]. CHICAGO JOHN M. OLIN LAW & ECONOMICS WORKING PAPER NO. 524 (2D SERIES) What Is So Special about Intangible Property? The Case for Intelligent Carryovers Richard A. Epstein THE LAW SCHOOL THE UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO August 2010 This paper can be downloaded without charge at: The Chicago Working Paper Series Index: http://www.law.uchicago.edu/Lawecon/index.html and at the Social Science Research Network Electronic Paper Collection. WHAT IS SO SPECIAL ABOUT INTANGIBLE PROPERTY? THE CASE FOR INTELLIGENT CARRYOVERS by Richard A. Epstein* ABSTRACT One of the major controversies in modern intellectual property law is the extent to which property rights conceptions, developed in connection with land or other forms of tangible property, can be carried over to different forms of property, such as rights in the spectrum or in patents and copyrights.
    [Show full text]
  • Tree of Life Marula Oil in Africa
    HerbalGram 79 • August – October 2008 HerbalGram 79 • August Herbs and Thyroid Disease • Rosehips for Osteoarthritis • Pelargonium for Bronchitis • Herbs of the Painted Desert The Journal of the American Botanical Council Number 79 | August – October 2008 Herbs and Thyroid Disease • Rosehips for Osteoarthritis • Pelargonium for Bronchitis • Herbs of the Painted Desert • Herbs of the Painted Bronchitis for Osteoarthritis Disease • Rosehips for • Pelargonium Thyroid Herbs and www.herbalgram.org www.herbalgram.org US/CAN $6.95 Tree of Life Marula Oil in Africa www.herbalgram.org Herb Pharm’s Botanical Education Garden PRESERVING THE FULL-SPECTRUM OF NATURE'S CHEMISTRY The Art & Science of Herbal Extraction At Herb Pharm we continue to revere and follow the centuries-old, time- proven wisdom of traditional herbal medicine, but we integrate that wisdom with the herbal sciences and technology of the 21st Century. We produce our herbal extracts in our new, FDA-audited, GMP- compliant herb processing facility which is located just two miles from our certified-organic herb farm. This assures prompt delivery of freshly-harvested herbs directly from the fields, or recently HPLC chromatograph showing dried herbs directly from the farm’s drying loft. Here we also biochemical consistency of 6 receive other organic and wildcrafted herbs from various parts of batches of St. John’s Wort extracts the USA and world. In producing our herbal extracts we use precision scientific instru- ments to analyze each herb’s many chemical compounds. However, You’ll find Herb Pharm we do not focus entirely on the herb’s so-called “active compound(s)” at fine natural products and, instead, treat each herb and its chemical compounds as an integrated whole.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent Law: a Handbook for Congress
    Patent Law: A Handbook for Congress September 16, 2020 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46525 SUMMARY R46525 Patent Law: A Handbook for Congress September 16, 2020 A patent gives its owner the exclusive right to make, use, import, sell, or offer for sale the invention covered by the patent. The patent system has long been viewed as important to Kevin T. Richards encouraging American innovation by providing an incentive for inventors to create. Without a Legislative Attorney patent system, the reasoning goes, there would be little incentive for invention because anyone could freely copy the inventor’s innovation. Congressional action in recent years has underscored the importance of the patent system, including a major revision to the patent laws in 2011 in the form of the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. Congress has also demonstrated an interest in patents and pharmaceutical pricing; the types of inventions that may be patented (also referred to as “patentable subject matter”); and the potential impact of patents on a vaccine for COVID-19. As patent law continues to be an area of congressional interest, this report provides background and descriptions of several key patent law doctrines. The report first describes the various parts of a patent, including the specification (which describes the invention) and the claims (which set out the legal boundaries of the patent owner’s exclusive rights). Next, the report provides detail on the basic doctrines governing patentability, enforcement, and patent validity. For patentability, the report details the various requirements that must be met before a patent is allowed to issue.
    [Show full text]
  • Patent and Trademark Cases Stephen Mcjohn
    Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Volume 9 Article 1 Issue 4 January Spring 2011 Top Tens in 2010: Patent and Trademark Cases Stephen McJohn Recommended Citation Stephen McJohn, Top Tens in 2010: Patent and Trademark Cases, 9 Nw. J. Tech. & Intell. Prop. 1 (2011). https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/njtip/vol9/iss4/1 This Perspective is brought to you for free and open access by Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property by an authorized editor of Northwestern Pritzker School of Law Scholarly Commons. NORTHWESTERN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY AND INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY Top Tens in 2010: Patent and Trademark Cases Stephen McJohn January 2011 VOL. 9, NO. 4 © 2011 by Northwestern University School of Law Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Copyright 2011 by Northwestern University School of Law Volume 9, Number 4 (January 2011) Northwestern Journal of Technology and Intellectual Property Top Tens in 2010: Patent and Trademark Cases By Stephen McJohn* ¶1 The following are notable intellectual property decisions for patent and trademark in 2010 in the United States. Notable copyright and trade secret cases will be examined in a subsequent article. Viewed across doctrinal lines, some interesting threads emerge involving the scope of protection, the amount of secondary liability, and ownership of the intellectual property rights. ¶2 The scope of protection was at issue in both areas. Bilski v. Kappos marked a shift from using technical tests for patent subject matter to relying on the basic exclusions against patents on laws of nature, physical phenomena, or abstract ideas.1 Ass’n for Molecular Pathology v.
    [Show full text]
  • A Sui Generis Regime for Traditional Knowledge: the Ulturc Al Divide in Intellectual Property Law J
    Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review Volume 15 | Issue 1 Article 3 Emerging Scholars Series: A Sui Generis Regime for Traditional Knowledge: The ulturC al Divide in Intellectual Property Law J. Janewa OseiTutu University of Pittsburgh School of Law Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr Part of the Intellectual Property Commons Repository Citation J. Janewa OseiTutu, Emerging Scholars Series: A Sui Generis Regime for Traditional Knowledge: The Cultural Divide in Intellectual Property Law, 15 Intellectual Property L. Rev. 147 (2011). Available at: http://scholarship.law.marquette.edu/iplr/vol15/iss1/3 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Journals at Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Marquette Intellectual Property Law Review by an authorized administrator of Marquette Law Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. EMERGING SCHOLARS SERIES* A SUI GENERIS REGIME FOR TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE: THE CULTURAL DIVIDE IN INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW J. JANEWA OSEITUTU** ABSTRACT .................................................................................................... 149 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................... 150 I. THE TRADITIONAL KNOWLEDGE QUESTION ..................................... 158 A. The Backlash against TRIPS ...................................................... 158 B. What Is Traditional Knowledge? ...............................................
    [Show full text]
  • TAXON:Hoodia Ruschii SCORE:-1.0 RATING:Low Risk
    TAXON: Hoodia ruschii SCORE: -1.0 RATING: Low Risk Taxon: Hoodia ruschii Family: Apocynaceae Common Name(s): hoodia Synonym(s): NA Assessor: Chuck Chimera Status: Assessor Approved End Date: 6 May 2015 WRA Score: -1.0 Designation: L Rating: Low Risk Keywords: Succulent, Spiny, Medicinal, Fly-Pollinated, Wind-Dispersed Qsn # Question Answer Option Answer 101 Is the species highly domesticated? y=-3, n=0 n 102 Has the species become naturalized where grown? 103 Does the species have weedy races? Species suited to tropical or subtropical climate(s) - If 201 island is primarily wet habitat, then substitute "wet (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High tropical" for "tropical or subtropical" 202 Quality of climate match data (0-low; 1-intermediate; 2-high) (See Appendix 2) High 203 Broad climate suitability (environmental versatility) y=1, n=0 n Native or naturalized in regions with tropical or 204 y=1, n=0 y subtropical climates Does the species have a history of repeated introductions 205 y=-2, ?=-1, n=0 ? outside its natural range? 301 Naturalized beyond native range y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2), n= question 205 n 302 Garden/amenity/disturbance weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 303 Agricultural/forestry/horticultural weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 304 Environmental weed n=0, y = 2*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 305 Congeneric weed n=0, y = 1*multiplier (see Appendix 2) n 401 Produces spines, thorns or burrs y=1, n=0 y 402 Allelopathic 403 Parasitic y=1, n=0 n 404 Unpalatable to grazing animals
    [Show full text]
  • Intangible Takings Susan Eisenberg
    Vanderbilt Law Review Volume 60 | Issue 2 Article 13 3-2007 Intangible Takings Susan Eisenberg Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr Part of the Intellectual Property Law Commons, and the Property Law and Real Estate Commons Recommended Citation Susan Eisenberg, Intangible Takings, 60 Vanderbilt Law Review 667 (2019) Available at: https://scholarship.law.vanderbilt.edu/vlr/vol60/iss2/13 This Note is brought to you for free and open access by Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Vanderbilt Law Review by an authorized editor of Scholarship@Vanderbilt Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. NOTES Intangible Takings INTRODU CTION .................................................................... 668 II. THE LEGAL CONTEXT OF INTANGIBLE TAKINGS .................. 673 A. ConstitutionalProtection of Private Property......... 673 1. Defining Property in the Takings Clause .... 674 2. Absence of Qualifying Test for Intangible Property Interests ........................................ 676 B. TraditionalLaw Affords No Property Interest in Phone N um bers ................................................... 676 1. FCC Rules Governing Ownership of Phone N um bers ....................................................... 676 2. Contract Law ................................................ 678 3. Intellectual Property Law ............................ 679 C. Denial of Protective Rights Produces Incongruous Law ....................................................
    [Show full text]
  • [PDF] Intangible Property Section of Uniform Administrative
    § 3019.35 7 CFR Ch. XXX (1–1–06 Edition) the equipment shall be subject to the (2) Authorize others to receive, repro- provisions for federally-owned equip- duce, publish, or otherwise use such ment. data for Federal purposes. (d) (1) In addition, in response to a § 3019.35 Supplies and other expend- Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) re- able property. quest for research data relating to pub- (a) Title to supplies and other ex- lished research findings produced under pendable property shall vest in the re- an award that were used by the Federal cipient upon acquisition. If there is a Government in developing an agency residual inventory of unused supplies action that has the force and effect of exceeding $5000 in total aggregate law, the Federal awarding agency shall value upon termination or completion request, and the recipient shall pro- of the project or program and the sup- vide, within a reasonable time, the re- plies are not needed for any other fed- search data so that they can be made erally-sponsored project or program, available to the public through the pro- the recipient shall retain the supplies cedures established under the FOIA. If for use on non-Federal sponsored ac- the Federal awarding agency obtains tivities or sell them, but shall, in ei- the research data solely in response to ther case, compensate the Federal Gov- a FOIA request, the agency may charge ernment for its share. The amount of the requester a reasonable fee equaling compensation shall be computed in the the full incremental cost of obtaining same manner as for equipment.
    [Show full text]
  • Cop13 Analyses Cover 29 Jul 04.Qxd
    IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices at the 13th Meeting of the Conference of the Parties Bangkok, Thailand 2-14 October 2004 Prepared by IUCN Species Survival Commission and TRAFFIC Production of the 2004 IUCN/TRAFFIC Analyses of the Proposals to Amend the CITES Appendices was made possible through the support of: The Commission of the European Union Canadian Wildlife Service Ministry of Agriculture, Nature and Food Quality, Department for Nature, the Netherlands Federal Agency for Nature Conservation, Germany Federal Veterinary Office, Switzerland Ministerio de Medio Ambiente, Dirección General para la Biodiversidad (Spain) Ministère de l'écologie et du développement durable, Direction de la nature et des paysages (France) IUCN-The World Conservation Union IUCN-The World Conservation Union brings together states, government agencies and a diverse range of non-governmental organizations in a unique global partnership - over 1 000 members in some 140 countries. As a Union, IUCN seeks to influence, encourage and assist societies throughout the world to conserve the integrity and diversity of nature and to ensure that any use of natural resources is equitable and ecologically sustainable. IUCN builds on the strengths of its members, networks and partners to enhance their capacity and to support global alliances to safeguard natural resources at local, regional and global levels. The Species Survival Commission (SSC) is the largest of IUCN’s six volunteer commissions. With 8 000 scientists, field researchers, government officials and conservation leaders, the SSC membership is an unmatched source of information about biodiversity conservation. SSC members provide technical and scientific advice to conservation activities throughout the world and to governments, international conventions and conservation organizations.
    [Show full text]
  • Potential for Domestication and Commercialization of Hoodia and Opuntia Species in Botswana
    African Journal of Biotechnology Vol. 7 (9), pp. 1199-1203, 2 May, 2008 Available online at http://www.academicjournals.org/AJB ISSN 1684–5315 © 2008 Academic Journals Review Potential for domestication and commercialization of Hoodia and Opuntia species in Botswana Tibe, O.1*, Modise, D. M.2 and Mogotsi, K. K.1 1Faculty of Agriculture, Botswana College of Agriculture, P/Bag 0027, Gaborone. Botswana. 2College of Agriculture and Environmental Sciences, University of South Africa, P.O. Box 392, Tshwane, 0003, South Africa. Accepted 10 April, 2007 The species Hoodia (Apocynaceae) and Opuntia (prickly pear) (Cactaceae) are highly efficient in water use and belong to the Crassulacean Acid Metabolism (CAM) group of plants. These plant species are quite abundant in Botswana especially in the Kalahari Desert, prickly pear being the most dominant even though they have received very little commercial attention in the country. Elsewhere in the world, prickly pear has multiple uses such as their utilisation in the pharmaceutical industry, as a source of food and drink for animals in the rural communities, and are important in the weaving and clothing industry. Other important uses of the species are manufacturing of paper, making of toothpicks, needles, pins and for numerous essential products. Recently the world has been introduced to Hoodia gordonii or curorri that works as a natural appetite suppressant. This paper reviews the potential uses of Opuntia and Hoodia spp, identifies the important species used by communities in Botswana and recommends protocols and instruments for research, cultivation, and commercialization of these species in the country. Key words: Commercialisation, communities, domestication Hoodia, Opuntia.
    [Show full text]
  • Certified Nursery
    CERTIFIED NURSERY Sustainable Bioresources, LLC #BRN: 0482 94-1707 Wakea Ave. Naalehu, HI 96772 VALID FROM YEAR 2016 Contact: Edward Rau PHONE: (808) 339-7325 Date Inspected: 1/8/2016 Island: Hawaii Date Inventory Reviewed: 1/20/2016 Plant Genus Pot Sizes Caralluma foetida 3.5", 5", 6", 1 gal, bareroot rooted cuttings, unrooted cuttings Cynanchum perrieri (Swallow wort) 3.5", 5", 6", bareroot rooted cuttings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia currorii 3.5", 5", 6", 8", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia currorii subsp. currorii 3.5", 5",6", 8", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia gordonii 3.5", 5",6", 8", 1Gal, 2Gal, bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia gordonii cultivar "HGNC" = "HGNC1" 3.5", 5", 8", 10",bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia gordonii HGNC X Hoodia spp. hybrids 2.5", 3.5", 5", 6", 8", 10", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted ("HCNGX- and HGNC" series cultivars) cuttings Hoodia gordonii HGNC2BX X Hoodia spp. 2.5", 3.5", 5", 6", 8", 10", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted hybrids ("HGNC2BX-" series cultivars) cuttings Hoodia gordonii X Hoodia spp. ("HGPPX-" series 2.5", 3.5", 5", 6", 8", 10", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted tetraploid hybrid cultivars) cuttings Hoodia gordonii X Hoodia spp. hybrids ("HGX-" 2.5", 3.5", 5", 6", 8", 10", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted series cultivars) cuttings Hoodia grandis 3.5", 5",6", 8", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia juttae 3.5", 5", 6", 8", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia juttae X Hoodia spp. hybrids ("HJX-" 2.5", 3.5", 5", 6", 8", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings series cultivars) Hoodia macrantha 3.5", 5", 6", 8", bareroot cuttings and seedlings, unrooted cuttings Hoodia macrantha X Hoodia spp.
    [Show full text]
  • Stapeliads, Morphology and Pollination, Welwitchia 5
    Morfologija in opra{evanje stapelijevk Stapeliads, morphology and pollination Iztok Mulej Matija Strli~ Stapelijevke so so~nice s ~udovitimi cvetovi in Stapeliads are succulents with beautiful flowers vonjem, ki ga taki cvetovi ne zaslu`ijo. Raz{irjene with a smell that does not match their beauty at so ve~inoma v Afriki, dotikajo se Evrope, v Aziji all. Distributed mainly in Africa, a few species can pa imajo tudi precej predstavnikov. Cvetovi so also be found in Europe, and quite a few in Asia. nekaj posebnega, ne samo po bizarni lepoti am- Their flowers are unique, not only due to the pak tudi po zgradbi. Prav tako je tudi opra{itev bizarre beauty, but also due to the unusual repro- samosvoja, saj podobne ne najdemo nikjer drug- ductive structures. Even the pollination mecha- je v rastlinskem svetu. nism has no parallel in the plant kingdom. Klju~ne besede: Keywords: stapelijevke, Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae, Stapeliads, Apocynaceae, Asclepiadoideae, mor- morfologija, opra{evanje. fology, pollination. Stapeliads, which are stem succulents, belong World" is the title of the web pages of Jerry to the family Apocynaceae and subfamily As- Barad from New Jersey, USA. The title says clepiadoideae. Until recently, they were everything. The flowers have a beauty and placed into the Asclepiadaceae family. The colour that can only be compared with or- stem shapes are very similar in most genera, chids. And they also share another character- but when they bloom, the beauty of the flow- istic. The pollen mass is fused in a wax pollen ers is striking as well as their unpleasant sack - pollinium, which is transferred by pol- smell! "Stapeliads, Orchids of the Succulent linators to the style.
    [Show full text]