ISB: Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

ISB: Atlas of Florida Vascular Plants Longleaf Pine Preserve Animal List Arachnid Mollusk Araneidae Spotted Orbweaver Spider Neoscona domiciliorum Ampullariidae Florida Apple Snail Pomacea paludosa Araneidae Black and Yellow Agriope Argiope aurantia Lycosidae Rabid wolf spider Rabidosa rabida Fish Pisauridae Shoreline Fishing Spider Dolomedes triton Amiidae Mudfish Amia calva Pisauridae Slender Nursery Web Spider Pisaurina undulata Centrarchidae Bluegill Lepomis macrochirus Salticidae Regal Jumping Spider Phidippus regius Centrarchidae Largemouth Bass Micropterus salmoides Tetragnathidae Long Jawed Orb Weaver Tetragnatha sp. Amphibian Insect Bufonidae Oak toad Anaxyrus quercicus Acrididae Lubber Grasshopper Romalea microptera Bufonidae Southern Toad Anaxyrus terrestris Acrididae Elegant Grasshopper Dichromorpha elegans Hylidae Southern Cricket Frog Acris gryllus Bibionidae Lovebug Plecia nearctica Hylidae Green Treefrog Hyla cinerea Cicadellidae Leafhopper Paraulacizes irrorata Hylidae Pinewoods Tree Frog Hyla fermoralis Curculionidae Red bay Ambrosia Beetle Xyleborus glabratus Hylidae Little Grass Frog Pseudacris ocularis Flatidae Flatid Leafhopper Metcalfa pruinosa Ranidae Pig Frog Lithobates grylio Formicidae Dolichoderine Ant Dorymyrmex sp. Formicidae Fire Ant Solenopsis invicta Reptile Gryllidae Field Cricket Gryllus sp. Colubridae Southern Black Racer Coluber constrictor Hesperiidae Twin-spot Skipper Oligoria maculata Colubridae Eastern Indigo Snake Drymarchon couperi Hesperiidae Tawny-edged Skipper Polites themistocles Colubridae Florida water snakeNerodia fasciata pictiventris Hesperiidae Whirlabout Polites vibex Crocodylidae Alligator Alligator mississippiensis Hesperiidae Long-tailed Skipper Urbanus proteus Emydidae Florida Cooter Pseudemys floridana Hesperiidae Southern Broken-Dash Wallengrenia otho Emydidae Florida Box Turtle Terrapene carolina bauri Nymphalidae Gulf Fritillary Agraulis vanillae Kinosternidae Striped Mud Turtle Kinosternon baurii Nymphalidae White Peacock Anartia jatrophae Kinosternidae Common Musk Turtle Sternotherus odoratus Nymphalidae Viceroy Limenitis archippus Polychrotidae Green Anole Anolis carolinensis Papilionidae Tiger Swallowtail Papilio glaucus Teiidae Six-lined RacerunnerCnemidophorus sexlineatus Papilionidae Palamedes Swallowtail Papilio palamedes Testudinidae Gopher Tortoise Gopherus polyphemus Papilionidae Eastern Black Swallowtail Papilio polyxenes Viperidae Eastern Diamondback Crotalus adamanteus Papilionidae Spicebush Swallowtail Papilio troilus Viperidae Dusky Pigmy RattlesnakeSistrurus miliarius barbouri Papilionidae Zebra Swallowtail Protographium marcellus Pieridae Barred Yellow Eurema daira Bird Pieridae Cloudless Sulphur Phoebis sennae Accipitridae Red-shouldered Hawk Buteo lineatus Pseudophasmatidae Two-striped walking stick Anisomorpha buprestoides Accipitridae Swallow Tailed Kite Elanoides forficatus Tabanidae Horse Fly Tabanus sp. Accipitridae Bald Eagle Haliaeetus leucocephalus Tettigoniidae Wingless Meadow Katydid Odontoxiphidium apterum Alcedinidae Belted Kingfisher Megaceryle alcyon Bird Continued Mammal Ardeidae Great Blue Heron Ardea herodias Cervidae White-tailed Deer Odocoileus virginianus Ardeidae Cattle Egret Bubulcus ibis Felidae Domestic Cat Felis domesticus Caprimulgidae Common Nighthawk Chordeiles minor Felidae Florida Bobcat Felis rufus Cardinalidae Northern Cardinal Cardinalis cardinalis Leporidae Eastern Cottontail Sylvilagus floridanus Cathartidae Turkey Vulture Cathartes aura Muridae Florida Mouse Podomys floridanus Cathartidae Black Vulture Coragyps atratus Mustelidae River Otter Lutra canadensis Certhiidae Blue-gray Gnatcatcher Polioptila caerulea Procyonidae Raccoon Procyon lotor Ciconiidae Wood Stork Mycteria americana Suidae Wild Hog Sus scrofa Columbidae Common Ground Dove Columbina passerina Ursidae Florida Black Bear Ursus americanus floridanus Columbidae Mourning Dove Zenaida macroura Corvidae American Crow Corvus brachyrhynchos Emberizidae Bachman's Sparrow Aimophila aestivalis Emberizidae Eastern Towhee Pipilo erythrophthalmus Odontophoridae Northern Bobwhite Colinus virginianus Updated 10/2013 Paridae Tufted Titmouse Baeolophus bicolor Parulidae Pine Warbler Dendroica pinus Parulidae Common Yellowthroat Geothlypis trichas Parulidae Northern Parula Parula americana Phasianidae Wild Turkey Meleagris gallopavo Picidae Pileated Woodpecker Dryocopus pileatus Picidae Red-bellied Woodpecker Melanerpes carolinus Picidae Red-headed Woodpecker Melanerpes erythrocephalus Picidae Downy Woodpecker Picoides pubescens Regulidae Ruby-Crowned Kinglet Regulus calendula Sittidae Brown-headed Nuthatch Sitta pusilla Strigidae Barred Owl Strix varia Troglodytidae Carolina Wren Thryothorus ludovicianus Turdidae Eastern Bluebird Sialia sialis Turdidae American Robin Turdus migratorius Tyrannidae Great Crested Flycatcher Myiarchus crinitus Vireonidae Yellow-throated Vireo Vireo flavifrons Vireonidae White-eyed Vireo Vireo griseus Vireonidae Red-eyed Vireo Vireo olivaceus.
Recommended publications
  • Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden
    Oak Woodland Litter Spiders James Steffen Chicago Botanic Garden George Retseck Objectives • Learn about Spiders as Animals • Learn to recognize common spiders to family • Learn about spider ecology • Learn to Collect and Preserve Spiders Kingdom - Animalia Phylum - Arthropoda Subphyla - Mandibulata Chelicerata Class - Arachnida Orders - Acari Opiliones Pseudoscorpiones Araneae Spiders Arachnids of Illinois • Order Acari: Mites and Ticks • Order Opiliones: Harvestmen • Order Pseudoscorpiones: Pseudoscorpions • Order Araneae: Spiders! Acari - Soil Mites Characteriscs of Spiders • Usually four pairs of simple eyes although some species may have less • Six pair of appendages: one pair of fangs (instead of mandibles), one pair of pedipalps, and four pair of walking legs • Spinnerets at the end of the abdomen, which are used for spinning silk threads for a variety of purposes, such as the construction of webs, snares, and retreats in which to live or to wrap prey • 1 pair of sensory palps (often much larger in males) between the first pair of legs and the chelicerae used for sperm transfer, prey manipulation, and detection of smells and vibrations • 1 to 2 pairs of book-lungs on the underside of abdomen • Primitively, 2 body regions: Cephalothorax, Abdomen Spider Life Cycle • Eggs in batches (egg sacs) • Hatch inside the egg sac • molt to spiderlings which leave from the egg sac • grows during several more molts (instars) • at final molt, becomes adult – Some long-lived mygalomorphs (tarantulas) molt after adulthood Phenology • Most temperate
    [Show full text]
  • Box Turtles July 2017
    The HERP Project, Herpetology Education in Rural Places and Spaces In Awe of Nature: Treasuring Terrestrial Turtles By Ann Berry Somers, Catherine Matthews, and Lacey Huffling The Herp Project is supported by the National Science Foundation, Grant No. DRL-1114558. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this manuscript are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation. Treasuring Terrestrial Turtles Before starting a project like the one described in this curriculum, contact your state wildlife resources commission or state division of fish and game to see what permits you need to work with box turtles. I. Project Description This curriculum was developed by The HERP (Herpetology Education in Rural Places and Spaces) Project to introduce participants to the wonders of nature and science through the study of box turtles (Terrapene spp.). The curriculum was developed over several years of working with high school students in our Herpetological Research Experience (HRE) residential program. Feel free to modify this curriculum as needed. In our program, participants are introduced to turtle biology as well as to The Box Turtle Connection (BTC), our long-term mark/recapture box turtle study in North Carolina. The BTC is designed to follow temporal trends in population size and structure (sex, age class) as well as the health and condition of individual box turtles from numerous sites across North Carolina. The data collected are important to help scientists determine if box turtles need special conservation measures to maintain their populations and thrive in their natural habitat. Our box turtle studies are enhanced by use of Boykin Spaniel dogs to locate and retrieve box turtles and use of radio tracking to determine activity ranges for male and female box turtles.
    [Show full text]
  • Arachnids (Excluding Acarina and Pseudoscorpionida) of the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge, Oklahoma
    OCCASIONAL PAPERS THE MUSEUM TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY NUMBER 67 5 SEPTEMBER 1980 ARACHNIDS (EXCLUDING ACARINA AND PSEUDOSCORPIONIDA) OF THE WICHITA MOUNTAINS WILDLIFE REFUGE, OKLAHOMA JAMES C. COKENDOLPHER AND FRANK D. BRYCE The Wichita Mountains are located in eastern Greer, southern Kiowa, and northwestern Comanche counties in Oklahoma. Since their formation more than 300 million years ago, these rugged mountains have been fragmented and weathered, until today the highest peak (Mount Pinchot) stands only 756 meters above sea level (Tyler, 1977). The mountains are composed predominantly of granite and gabbro. Forests of oak, elm, and walnut border most waterways, while at elevations from 153 to 427 meters prair­ ies are the predominant vegetation type. A more detailed sum­ mary of the climatic and biotic features of the Wichitas has been presented by Blair and Hubbell (1938). A large tract of land in the eastern range of the Wichita Moun­ tains (now northeastern Comanche County) was set aside as the Wichita National Forest by President McKinley during 1901. In 1905, President Theodore Roosevelt created a game preserve on those lands managed by the Forest Service. Since 1935, this pre­ serve has been known as the Wichita Mountains Wildlife Refuge. Numerous papers on Oklahoma spiders have been published (Bailey and Chada, 1968; Bailey et al., 1968; Banks et al, 1932; Branson, 1958, 1959, 1966, 1968; Branson and Drew, 1972; Gro- thaus, 1968; Harrel, 1962, 1965; Horner, 1975; Rogers and Horner, 1977), but only a single, comprehensive work (Banks et al., 1932) exists covering all arachnid orders in the state. Further additions and annotations to the arachnid fauna of Oklahoma can be found 2 OCCASIONAL PAPERS MUSEUM TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY in recent revisionary studies.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Survey of Four Longleaf Pine Preserves
    A SURVEY OF THE MOTHS, BUTTERFLIES, AND GRASSHOPPERS OF FOUR NATURE CONSERVANCY PRESERVES IN SOUTHEASTERN NORTH CAROLINA Stephen P. Hall and Dale F. Schweitzer November 15, 1993 ABSTRACT Moths, butterflies, and grasshoppers were surveyed within four longleaf pine preserves owned by the North Carolina Nature Conservancy during the growing season of 1991 and 1992. Over 7,000 specimens (either collected or seen in the field) were identified, representing 512 different species and 28 families. Forty-one of these we consider to be distinctive of the two fire- maintained communities principally under investigation, the longleaf pine savannas and flatwoods. An additional 14 species we consider distinctive of the pocosins that occur in close association with the savannas and flatwoods. Twenty nine species appear to be rare enough to be included on the list of elements monitored by the North Carolina Natural Heritage Program (eight others in this category have been reported from one of these sites, the Green Swamp, but were not observed in this study). Two of the moths collected, Spartiniphaga carterae and Agrotis buchholzi, are currently candidates for federal listing as Threatened or Endangered species. Another species, Hemipachnobia s. subporphyrea, appears to be endemic to North Carolina and should also be considered for federal candidate status. With few exceptions, even the species that seem to be most closely associated with savannas and flatwoods show few direct defenses against fire, the primary force responsible for maintaining these communities. Instead, the majority of these insects probably survive within this region due to their ability to rapidly re-colonize recently burned areas from small, well-dispersed refugia.
    [Show full text]
  • SPIDERS of WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Orrey P. Young Southern Field Crop Insect Management Laboratory USDA-ARS, P.O. Box
    Young, O . P., T. C . Lockley and G . B . Edwards . 1989 . Spiders of Washington County, Mississippi . J . Arachnol ., 17 :27-41 . SPIDERS OF WASHINGTON COUNTY, MISSISSIPPI Orrey P. Young Southern Field Crop Insect Management Laboratory USDA-ARS, P.O. Box 346 Stoneville, Mississippi 38776 USA Timothy C. Lockley Imported Fire Ant Station USDA-APHIS-PPQ 3505 25th Avenue Gulfport, Mississippi 39501 USA and G. B. Edwards Florida State Collection of Arthropods Division of Plant Industry Florida Dept. Agric. & Cons . Serv. P.O. Box 1269 Gainesville, Florida 32602 USA ABSTRACT Over a seven-year period, approximately 35,000 spiders representing 26 families, 133 genera, and 234 species were captured in Washington County, Mississippi, by pitfall, sweepnet, vacuum, bag, and hand. Specimens were collected in 10 different habitat types and in four vegetational strata . Old-field habitats yielded the most species (152) and residential lawns the fewest (14) . Considering all habitats sampled, the ground layer produced 111 species, the herbaceous strata 133, the shrub layer 49, and the tree strata 30 species . The sweepnet method of capture obtained 128 species, pitfall 95, hand 61, vacuum 53, and bagging 19 species. The largest number of species were obtained in spring and early summer (maximum of 125 in May), with the fewest in mid-winter (Jan . = 24) . Twenty-one species were considered abundant, 51 common, 67 uncommon, and 95 rare . Additions to the state list of Dorris (1972) number 102 species, for a new state total of 364 species . A comparison with the North American fauna and with other surveys indicates that Washington County is underrepresented both in cursorial forms active on the soil surface and web-spinning forms typical of undisturbed habitats .
    [Show full text]
  • Notes on Neotropical Proconiini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae), IV: Lectotype Designations of Aulacizes Amyot &
    Arthropod Systematics & Phylogeny 105 64 (1) 105–111 © Museum für Tierkunde Dresden, ISSN 1863-7221, 30.10.2006 Notes on Neotropical Proconiini (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae: Cicadellinae), IV: lectotype designations of Aulacizes Amyot & Audinet-Serville species described by Germar and revalidation of A. erythrocephala (Germar, 1821) GABRIEL MEJDALANI 1, DANIELA M. TAKIYA 2 & RACHEL A. CARVALHO 1 1 Departamento de Entomologia, Museu Nacional, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Quinta da Boa Vista, São Cristóvão, 20940-040 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil [[email protected]] 2 Center for Biodiversity, Illinois Natural History Survey, 1816 S. Oak Street, Champaign, IL 61820, USA [[email protected]] Received 17.iii.2005, accepted 22.viii.2006. Available online at www.arthropod-systematics.de > Abstract Lectotypes are designated for the sharpshooter species Aulacizes erythrocephala (Germar, 1821) and A. quadripunctata (Germar, 1821) based on recently located specimens from the Germar collection. The former species is reinstated from synonymy of the latter one and is redescribed and illustrated based on specimens from Southeastern Brazil. The male and female genitalia are described for the fi rst time. The two species are similar morphologically, but they can be easily distinguished from each other, as well as from the other species of the genus, by their color patterns. > Key words Membracoidea, Aulacizes quadripunctata, leafhopper, sharpshooter, taxonomy, morphology, Brazil. 1. Introduction This is the fourth paper of a series on the taxonomy redescribed and illustrated. One sharpshooter type of the leafhopper tribe Proconiini in the Neotropical located in the Germar collection (Homalodisca vitri- region. The fi rst three papers included descriptions of pennis (Germar, Year 1821)) was previously designated two new species and notes on other species in the tribe by TAKIYA et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Pine Island Ridge Management Plan
    Pine Island Ridge Conservation Management Plan Broward County Parks and Recreation May 2020 Update of 1999 Management Plan Table of Contents A. General Information ..............................................................................................................3 B. Natural and Cultural Resources ...........................................................................................8 C. Use of the Property ..............................................................................................................13 D. Management Activities ........................................................................................................18 E. Works Cited ..........................................................................................................................29 List of Tables Table 1. Management Goals…………………………………………………………………21 Table 2. Estimated Costs……………………………………………………………….........27 List of Attachments Appendix A. Pine Island Ridge Lease 4005……………………………………………... A-1 Appendix B. Property Deeds………….............................................................................. B-1 Appendix C. Pine Island Ridge Improvements………………………………………….. C-1 Appendix D. Conservation Lands within 10 miles of Pine Island Ridge Park………….. D-1 Appendix E. 1948 Aerial Photograph……………………………………………………. E-1 Appendix F. Development Agreement………………………………………………….. F-1 Appendix G. Plant Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge……………………………… G-1 Appendix H. Wildlife Species Observed at Pine Island Ridge ……... …………………. H-1 Appendix
    [Show full text]
  • Contact Chemoreception Guides Oviposition of Two Lauraceae-Specialized Swallowtail Butterflies (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae)
    Vol. 7 No. 2 2000 FRANKFATER and SCRIBER: Chemoreception and Oviposition in Papilio 33 HOLARCTIC LEPIDOPTERA, 7(2): 33-38 (2003) CONTACT CHEMORECEPTION GUIDES OVIPOSITION OF TWO LAURACEAE-SPECIALIZED SWALLOWTAIL BUTTERFLIES (LEPIDOPTERA: PAPILIONIDAE) CHERYL FRANKFATER1 and J. MARK SCRIBER Dept. of Entomology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA ABSTRACT.- Females of Papilio iroilus Linnaeus and Papilio palamedes Drury (Lepidoptera: Papilionidae), two closely related swallowtail butterflies, oviposit almost exclusively on a few woody plant species in the family Lauraceae. While geographic patterns of preference differ among Lauraceae species, the butterflies rarely oviposit on any plant species outside the Lauraceae.The role of host plant chemistry in stimulating oviposition was assessed by extracting the preferred host foliage of the respective butterfly species, spraying the extracts and fractions on various substrates, and assessing oviposition relative to controls. P. troilus and P. palamedes were stimulated to oviposit on filter paper or non-host leaves sprayed with polar extracts of their primary host plants, indicating clearly that leaf chemistry, detectable as contact chemosensory cues, plays a significant role in their oviposition choices. Dependence on chemical oviposition elicitors found only in the foliage of the host plants may explain the behavioral fidelity to Lauraceae shown by these two oligophagous butterflies. KEY WORDS: behavior, Florida, Michigan, Nearctic, North America, Ohio, oviposition behavior, Papilio. The swallowtail butterflies, Papilio palamedes Drury and P. 1983, 1988, 1989; Nishida and Fukami, 1989; Honda, 1986, 1990; troilus Linnaeus, recognize a very restricted range of plant taxa as Oshugi etal., 1991; Papaj et al., 1992; Sachdev-Gupta et al., 1993; hosts, ovipositing exclusively on a few species within the Lauraceae.
    [Show full text]
  • Museum of Natural History
    p m r- r-' ME FYF-11 - - T r r.- 1. 4,6*. of the FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehr Volume 40, No. 1, pf 1-176 1997 == 46 1ms 34 i " 4 '· 0?1~ I. Al' Ai: *'%, R' I.' I / Em/-.Ail-%- .1/9" . -_____- UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA GAINESVILLE Numbers of the BULLETIN OF THE FLORIDA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY am published at irregular intervals Volumes contain about 300 pages and are not necessarily completed in any one calendar year. JOHN F. EISENBERG, EDITOR RICHARD FRANZ CO-EDIWR RHODA J. BRYANT, A£ANAGING EMOR Communications concerning purchase or exchange of the publications and all manuscripts should be addressed to: Managing Editor. Bulletin; Florida Museum of Natural Histoty, University of Florida P. O. Box 117800, Gainesville FL 32611-7800; US.A This journal is printed on recycled paper. ISSN: 0071-6154 CODEN: BF 5BAS Publication date: October 1, 1997 Price: $ 10.00 Frontispiece: Female Florida panther #32 treed by hounds in a laurel oak at the site of her first capture on the Florida Panther National Wildlife Refuge in central Collier County, 3 February 1989. Photograph by David S. Maehr. THE COMPARATIVE ECOLOGY OF BOBCAT, BLACK BEAR, AND FLORIDA PANTHER IN SOUTH FLORIDA David Steffen Maehri ABSTRACT Comparisons of food habits, habitat use, and movements revealed a low probability for competitive interactions among bobcat (Lynx ndia). Florida panther (Puma concotor cooi 1 and black bear (Urns amencanus) in South Florida. All three species preferred upland forests but ©onsumed different foods and utilized the landscape in ways that resulted in ecological separation.
    [Show full text]
  • Black Swallowtail, Papilio Polyxenes
    A Horticulture Information article from the Wisconsin Master Gardener website, posted 10 July 2015 Black swallowtail, Papilio polyxenes The black swallowtail – also called the eastern black swallowtail or American swallowtail, and a variety of other colloquial names such as parsley worm – is a common butterfl y found throughout much of North America. Papilio polyxenes is one of many species in the largest genus in the butterfl y family Papilionidae (swallowtails). It ranges from southern Canada to northern South America, but is most common east of the Rocky Mountains. There are several subspecies that occur in Mexico, Central America and South America. It has been designated as the state butterfl y of Oklahoma. Adult black swallowtails are usually found in open areas, such as Black swallow tail is a common butterfl y thoughout eastern North America. fi elds, meadows, parks, wetlands, prairies and sunny backyards. Females tend to be larger than the males, with a wingspan of 3¼ to 4¼ inches. The wings are black with yellow, blue, orange and red markings. On the upper surface there are two rows of yellow spots along the edges, with a powdery iridescent blue area between the two rows and a red eyespot (red circle with a The male blackswallowtail has more black bulls-eye) near noticable yellow and less blue on the wings. the margin of each hind wing. The yellow spots are typically large and bright and the blue not very prominent on males, while females have smaller and lighter colored yellow spots but a prominent The female black swallowtail has more blue area (although some blue and less yellow on the wings.
    [Show full text]
  • California Agriculture Detector Dog Team Program, Annual Report
    Cooperative Agreement #17-8506-1165-CA CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF FOOD AND AGRICULTURE CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURE DETECTOR DOG TEAM PROGRAM Annual Report July 1, 2017 - June 30, 2018 Pictured: Northern California USPS NDDTC class. This is the first year that the NDDTC provided the USPS training class and validation test that was developed for California. Picture courtesy of Laura McCready in Sacramento County. CONTENTS Purpose of Cooperative Agreement #17-8506-1165-CA ................................................................................... 3 Work Plan Activities Performed by the CDFA ...................................................................................................... 3 Work Plan Activities Performed by County Agricultural Commissioners.......................................................... 3 Replacements and Additions .................................................................................................................................. 4 Summary of Dog Team Interceptions at Parcel Facilities .................................................................................. 4 USPS Progress ......................................................................................................................................................... 5 Graph 3: California Dog Teams - Pest Interception Totals per Facility Type.............................................. 5 Graph 4: Comparison of Marked vs. Unmarked Parcel Interceptions by Parcel Facility ............................ 6 Significant Pest Interceptions
    [Show full text]
  • The Spatial Ecology of the Eastern Box Turtle (Terrapene Carolina Carolina) in a Fragmented Landscape in Southeast Tennessee, Hamilton County
    THE SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF THE EASTERN BOX TURTLE (TERRAPENE CAROLINA CAROLINA) IN A FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE IN SOUTHEAST TENNESSEE, HAMILTON COUNTY By Mark J. Dillard Thomas P. Wilson David A. Aborn UC Foundation Associate Professor of Associate Professor of Biology Biology Committee Member Committee Chair Bradley R. Reynolds Senior Lecturer of Environmental Science Committee Member THE SPATIAL ECOLOGY OF THE EASTERN BOX TURTLE (TERRAPENE CAROLINACAROLINA) IN A FRAGMENTED LANDSCAPE IN SOUTHEAST TENNESSEE, HAMILTON COUNTY By Mark J. Dillard A Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of the University of Tennessee at Chattanooga in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements of the Degree of Master of Science: Environmental Science The University of Tennessee at Chattanooga Chattanooga, Tennessee December 2016 ii Copyright © 2016 By Mark John Dillard All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT The landscape throughout the range of the Eastern Box turtle (Terrapene carolina carolina) has been altered significantly since the late 1880s by habitat fragmentation. In this study, the spatial ecology and seasonal movement patterns of the Eastern Box turtle in contrasting habitat types are investigated. Eastern Box turtles had home ranges that averaged (mean = 3.77 ± 2.82 ha, minimum convex polygon) in size among individuals. There was no significant difference between mean annual home range size and movement patterns between males and females; however, home range size for male turtles was larger during the summer versus spring activity season (P = 0.02). At the landscape level, turtles used eastern deciduous forest and successional habitats and they selected sites with ample ground and canopy cover. These findings can be used to better conserve the habitats and populations of the Eastern Box turtle.
    [Show full text]