DOCSLIB.ORG

Translating for Linguistic Minorities: Translation Policy in the United Kingdom

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 ADVERTIMENT. L'accés als continguts d'aquesta tesi doctoral i la seva utilització ha de respectar els drets de la persona autora. Pot ser utilitzada per a consulta o estudi personal, així com en activitats o materials d'investigació i docència en els termes establerts a l'art. 32 del Text Refós de la Llei de Propietat Intel·lectual (RDL 1/1996). Per altres utilitzacions es requereix l'autorització prèvia i expressa de la persona autora. En qualsevol cas, en la utilització dels seus continguts caldrà indicar de forma clara el nom i cognoms de la persona autora i el títol de la tesi doctoral. No s'autoritza la seva reproducció o altres formes d'explotació efectuades amb finalitats de lucre ni la seva comunicació pública des d'un lloc aliè al servei TDX. Tampoc s'autoritza la presentació del seu contingut en una finestra o marc aliè a TDX (framing). Aquesta reserva de drets afecta tant als continguts de la tesi com als seus resums i índexs. ADVERTENCIA. El acceso a los contenidos de esta tesis doctoral y su utilización debe respetar los derechos de la persona autora. Puede ser utilizada para consulta o estudio personal, así como en actividades o materiales de investigación y docencia en los términos establecidos en el art. 32 del Texto Refundido de la Ley de Propiedad Intelectual (RDL 1/1996). Para otros usos se requiere la autorización previa y expresa de la persona autora. En cualquier caso, en la utilización de sus contenidos se deberá indicar de forma clara el nombre y apellidos de la persona autora y el título de la tesis doctoral. No se autoriza su reproducción u otras formas de explotación efectuadas con fines lucrativos ni su comunicación pública desde un sitio ajeno al servicio TDR. Tampoco se autoriza la presentación de su contenido en una ventana o marco ajeno a TDR (framing). Esta reserva de derechos afecta tanto al contenido de la tesis como a sus resúmenes e índices. WARNING. Access to the contents of this doctoral thesis and its use must respect the rights of the author. It can be used for reference or private study, as well as research and learning activities or materials in the terms established by the 32nd article of the Spanish Consolidated Copyright Act (RDL 1/1996). Express and previous authorization of the author is required for any other uses. In any case, when using its content, full name of the author and title of the thesis must be clearly indicated. Reproduction or other forms of for profit use or public communication from outside TDX service is not allowed. Presentation of its content in a window or frame external to TDX (framing) is not authorized either. These rights affect both the content of the thesis and its abstracts and indexes. UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 GABRIEL GONZÁLEZ NÚÑEZ TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM DOCTORAL THESIS Supervised by Dr. Anthony Pym and Dr. Reine Meylaerts Intercultural Studies Group Department of English and German Studies Leuven 2014 UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 Para mi bienamada percanta, porque nunca me amuró y me da lo mejor de su vida UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 Acknowledgments It is a tricky exercise to acknowledge the help of everyone who lent a hand in one way or another in my putting together this study. So many people contributed in so many different ways, that I fear despite my best efforts, someone will always be left out. Even so, I would be ungrateful not to recognize the many helpers I had along the way. So here we go: To begin with, I wish to extend special thanks to my family. To my siblings, whose visits to Europe gave me a welcome respite from my daily tasks. To my parents, who have given me their unconditional support in all my endeavors, including this one, and who have laid the foundation upon which my house is built. To my two tireless daughters, who constantly remind me with their we-couldn’t-care-less-about-your-thesis playfulness that my life’s most important work happens within the walls of the home. To my wife, for being the anchor in my stormy nights and the motor behind everything that has any worth in my life, ever since that day in December 2008 until forever. And finally, I wish to thank God, whom I have learned to call Padre, with all that entails. Next, I should not fail to recognize the needed contributions made here and there by support personnel at OSE, ECMI, URV, and KU Lueven. I would highlight among them the support of Inge Petré (at the Facutly of Arts’ financial cell), Steven Dewallens (at CETRA and the research unit), Myriam Witvrouw (with TIME at KU Leuven’s R&D), Karen Vandemeulebroucke and Lieve Behiels (back-to-back doctoral coordinators), Stefan Derouck (at the central library’s Interlibrary Loan), and Ester Torres (at URV’s Intercultural Studies Group). I would also give thanks to a number of individuals who made the time I spent at KU Leuven quite amicable, especially Maud Gonne, Esmaeil Haddadian, and Nicodème Niyongabo. I also enjoyed the social and academic support of the other Marie Curie Actions fellows: Carlos Teixeira, Marta Miquel, Wine Tesseur, and Sara Ramos Pinto. And then there was my buddy Troy Munro, who single-handedly saved my bibliography despite being busy with his own doctoral work. I am also grateful for a number of professors who offered advise along the way. Some of this happened in the context of CETRA, where I would point to Peter Flynn, José Lambert, Franz Pöchhacker, Dirk Delabastita, and Miriam Shlesinger (RIP) in particular. And some happened in the context of TIME, where I would point to Yves Gambier and Christina Schaeffner. There were a number of individuals who read early, cumbersome drafts of parts of this thesis and offered their constructive feedback: José María Arraiza (at the OSCE), Tove Malloy (at ECMI), Federica Prina (at ECMI), Rita Baeten (at OSE), and Andrew Chesterman (who read almost the whole thing from his home in Finland). I thank them for their insights and encouragement. I also wish to thank the three members of my doctoral committee: Fernand de Varennes, Anthony Pym, and Reine Meylaerts. Fernand de Varennes was kind enough to join without even having heard of me or this project, and his feedback was always insightful, always welcome. Anthony Pym and Reine Meylaerts are also the supervisors of this thesis, and they were a constant source of support from day one. I am particularly grateful to Anthony Pym for pointing me in the direction of KU Leuven and for sticking with me until the very end, despite having the busiest schedule in all of TS. I am especially grateful to Reine Meylaerts, who took a chance on me by choosing me for this project, advised me regularly (even weekly or more), guided me on everything from managing the university’s labyrinth to the content of every page in this thesis, and is just a really cool person. A hartelijk thanks to her. UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 Professor Anthony Pym President European Society for Translation Studies URV. Av. Catalunya 35 43002 Tarragona, Spain [email protected] April 20, 2013 I hereby certify that the present study “Translating for Linguistic Minorities: Translation Policy in the United Kingdom”, presented by Gabriel González Núñez for the award of the degree of Doctor, has been carried out under the supervision of myself at the Department of English and German Studies of the Rovira i Virgili University, and by Dr.Reine Meylaerts of the KU Leuven, and that it fulfills all the requirements for the award of Doctor. Tarragona, April 20, 2013. UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 Reine Meylaerts Faculty of Arts KU Leuven Blijde-Inkomststraat 21 Bus 3310 3000 Leuven, Belgium April 20, 2013 I hereby certify that the present study “Translating for Linguistic Minorities: Translation Policy in the United Kingdom”, presented by Gabriel González Núñez for the award of the degree of Doctor, has been carried out under the supervision of myself at the Research Unit Translation Studies, Faculty of Arts of the KU Leuven and that it fulfills all the requirements for the award of Doctor. Leuven, May 25, 2014. UNIVERSITAT ROVIRA I VIRGILI TRANSLATING FOR LINGUISTIC MINORITIES: TRANSLATION POLICY IN THE UNITED KINGDOM. Gabriel González Núñez Dipòsit Legal: T 1681-2015 Abstract: In contemporary Europe, state languages come in contact with a tapestry of immigrant languages and a set of ever more legitimized regional or minority languages. In this context, policymakers are faced with changing demographics and attitudes about rights and integration. Current research on language policies as they pertain to integration largely overlooks the role of translation. This thesis hopes to shed light on this oft-overlooked area.
Recommended publications
  • Legal and Regulatory Approaches to Rehabilitation Planning

    Legal and Regulatory Approaches to Rehabilitation Planning

    International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health Review Legal and Regulatory Approaches to Rehabilitation Planning: A Concise Overview of Current Laws and Policies Addressing Access to Rehabilitation in Five European Countries Aditi Garg 1,*, Dimitrios Skempes 1,2 and Jerome Bickenbach 1,2 1 Department of Health Sciences and Medicine, University of Lucerne, Frohburgstrasse 3, 6002 Luzern, Switzerland; [email protected] (D.S.); [email protected] (J.B.) 2 Swiss Paraplegic Research, Guido A. Zäch Str. 4, 6207 Nottwil, Switzerland * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-519-239-5295 Received: 6 May 2020; Accepted: 5 June 2020; Published: 18 June 2020 Abstract: Background: The rising prevalence of disability due to noncommunicable diseases and the aging process in tandem with under-prioritization and underdevelopment of rehabilitation services remains a significant concern for European public health. Over recent years, health system responses to population health needs, including rehabilitation needs, have been increasingly acknowledging the power of law and formal written policies as strategic governance tools to improve population health outcomes. However, the contents and scope of enacted legislation and adopted policies concerning rehabilitation services in Europe has not been synthesized. This paper presents a concise overview of laws and policies addressing rehabilitation in five European countries. Methods: Publicly available laws, policies, and national action plans addressing rehabilitation issues of Sweden, Italy, Germany, the Netherlands and the United Kingdom were reviewed and descriptive documents analyzed. Actions found in national health policies were also evaluated for compliance with the key recommendations specified in the World Health Organization’s Rehabilitation 2030: Call for Action.
  • Health Service Commissioners Act 1993

    Health Service Commissioners Act 1993

    Changes to legislation: There are outstanding changes not yet made by the legislation.gov.uk editorial team to Health Service Commissioners Act 1993. Any changes that have already been made by the team appear in the content and are referenced with annotations. (See end of Document for details) ELIZABETH II c. 46 Health Service Commissioners Act 1993 1993 CHAPTER 46 An Act to consolidate the enactments relating to the Health Service Commissioners for England, for Wales and for Scotland with amendments to give effect to recommendations of the Law Commission and the Scottish Law Commission. [5th November 1993] F1Be it enacted by the Queen’s most Excellent Majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the Lords Spiritual and Temporal, and Commons, in this present Parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same, as follows:— Annotations: Amendments (Textual) F1 Act repealed (S.) (23.10.2002) by 2002 asp 11, s. 25(1), Sch. 6 para. 14 (with savings in Sch. 7); S.S.I. 2002/467, art. 2 Modifications etc. (not altering text) C1 Act applied (1.4.1999) by S.I. 1999/686, art. 5(1), Sch. Pt. II Act applied (with modifications)(1.4.1999) by S.I. 1999/726, art. 5(1)(2), Sch. Pt. II Act applied (6.4.2001) by S.I. 2001/137, art. 5, Sch. Pt. II Act applied (S.) (31.3.2002) by S.S.I. 2002/103, art. 6, Sch. Pt. II (with art. 4(4)) Act applied (S.) (27.6.2002) by S.S.I. 2002/305, art.
  • ECONOMY of the UNITED KINGDOM. Wikipedia. June 2013

    ECONOMY of the UNITED KINGDOM. Wikipedia. June 2013

    Economy of the United Kingdom - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Create account Log in Article Talk Read Edit Economy of the United Kingdom From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected from UK economy) Main page Contents The United Kingdom has the sixth-largest national economy in the world Economy of the United Kingdom Featured content measured by nominal GDP and eighth-largest measured by purchasing Current events power parity (PPP), and the third-largest in Europe measured by nominal Random article GDP and the second-largest in Europe measured by PPP. The UK's GDP Donate to Wikipedia per capita is the 22nd-highest in the world in nominal terms and 22nd- highest measured by PPP. The British economy comprises (in descending Interaction order of size) the economies of England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Help Ireland. About Wikipedia [13] Community portal The UK has one of the world's most globalised economies. London is [14][15][16] Recent changes the world's largest financial centre alongside New York and has [17] Contact Wikipedia the largest city GDP in Europe. As of December 2010 the UK had the third-largest stock of both inward and outward foreign direct Canary Wharf business district in London Toolbox investment.[18][19] The aerospace industry of the UK is the second- or third- Rank 6th (nominal) / 8th (PPP) (2nd in Europe) Print/export largest national aerospace industry, depending upon the method of Pound sterling (GBP) measurement.[20][21] The pharmaceutical industry plays an important role in Currency Languages the UK economy and the country has the third-highest share of global Fiscal year 6 April – 5 April pharmaceutical R&D expenditures (after the United States and Trade European Union, OECD and World Trade Organization Български Japan).[22][23] The British economy is boosted by North Sea oil and gas organisations Català reserves, valued at an estimated £250 billion in 2007.[24] The UK is Statistics Česky currently ranked seventh in the world in the World Bank's Ease of Doing GDP 2012 (PPP): $2.375 trillion (9th, 2nd in Cymraeg Europe).
  • How Can the Lens of Human Rights Provide a New Perspective on Drug Control and Point to Different Ways of Regulating Drug Consumption?

    How Can the Lens of Human Rights Provide a New Perspective on Drug Control and Point to Different Ways of Regulating Drug Consumption?

    How can the lens of human rights provide a new perspective on drug control and point to different ways of regulating drug consumption? A thesis submitted to The University of Manchester for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Faculty of Humanities 2015 Melissa L. Bone School of Law Table of Contents Index of Tables……………………………………………………………………..….5 Table of Cases………………………………………….………………………………6 Table of Statutes, Treaties and Legislative Instruments……………………………....10 List of Abbreviations…………………………………………………………………15 Abstract………………………………………………...…………………………….18 Candidate’s Declaration and Copyright Statement…………………………………...19 Acknowledgements…………………………………...……………………………...20 Introduction………………………………………………………………..…………22 Chapter 1: Understanding the origin and value of human rights and psychoactive consumption………………………………………………………………………….32 1.1 What are human rights and where have they come from?………..……………….33 1.2 Human right foundations and the question of importance…………...……………36 1.3 The grounds for human rights…………………………………………….………42 1.3.1 ‘The universalist challenge’…………………………………………..46 1.4 The origin and value of human psychoactive consumption……………………….49 1.5 Conclusion……………………………………………………………..…………54 Chapter 2: Understanding how human rights can address the drug policy binary: the conflict between the interests of the State and the interests of the individual………….55 2.1 Defining ‘the State’……………………………………………………...………..56 2.2 Identifying four ‘typical philosophical positions and the binary which underpins them……………………………………………………………….………………….62
  • Key Dates in Tobacco Regulation 1962 — 2020

    Key Dates in Tobacco Regulation 1962 — 2020

    Key dates in tobacco regulation 1962 — 2020 16 Further information about the early history of tobacco is available at: www.tobacco.org/History/history.html 1962 The first Royal College of Physicians (RCP) report, "Smoking and Health", was published. It received massive publicity. The main recommendations were: restriction of tobacco advertising; increased taxation on cigarettes; more restrictions on the sales of cigarettes to children, and smoking in public places; and more information on the tar/nicotine content of cigarettes. For the first time in a decade, cigarette sales fell. The Tobacco Advisory Committee (subsequently Council, and now known as the Tobacco Manufacturers’ Association) - which represents the interests of the tobacco industry - agreed to implement a code of advertising practice for cigarettes which was intended to take some of the glamour out of cigarette advertisements. The code was based on the former ITA code governing cigarette advertisements on TV (before they were removed in 1964, with the co-operation of the ITA) 1964 The US Surgeon General produced his first report on "Smoking and Health". Its conclusions corroborated those of the RCP and the US Surgeon General has produced annual reports since 1967 on the health consequences on smoking. Doll and Hill published the results of a nationwide prospective survey on "mortality in relation to smoking: 10 years' observations in British Doctors". Between 1951 and 1964 about half the UK's doctors who smoked gave up and there was a dramatic fall in lung cancer incidence among those who gave up as opposed to those who continued to smoke. 1965 After considerable debate, the government used the powers vested in it under the terms of the 1964 Television Act to ban cigarette advertisements on television.
  • PLACE-NAMES of FLINTSHIRE

    PLACE-NAMES of FLINTSHIRE

    1 PLACE-NAMES of FLINTSHIRE HYWEL WYN OWEN KEN LLOYD GRUFFYDD 2 LIST A. COMPRISES OF THE NAMED LOCATIONS SHOWN ON THE ORDNANCE SURVEY LANDRANGER MAPS, SCALE 1 : 50,000 ( 2009 SELECTED REVISION ). SHEETS 116, 117, 126. 3 PLACE-NAMES NGR EARLY FORM(S) & DATE SOURCE / COMMENT Abbey Farm SJ 0277 The Abby 1754 Rhuddlan PR Plas newydd or Abbey farm 1820 FRO D/M/830. Plas Newydd or Abbey Farm 1849 FRO D/M/804. Aberduna SJ 2062 Dwi’n rhyw amau nad yw yn Sir y Fflint ? Aberdunne 1652 Llanferres PR Aberdynna 1674 “ “ Aberdynne 1711 “ “ Aberdinna 1726 “ “ Aber Dinna 1739 “ “ Aberdyne 1780 “ “ Aberdine 1793 “ “ Abermorddu SJ 3056 Abermoelduy 1378 CPR,1377-81, 233. Aber mole (sic) 1587 FRO, D/GW/1113. Aber y Moel du 1628 BU Bodrhyddan 719. Abermorddu 1771 Hope PR Abermorddu 1777 Hope PR Abermordy 1786 Hope PR Abermorddu 1788 Hope PR Abermordy 1795 Hope PR Abermorddy 1795 John Evans’ Map. Abermordey 1799 Hope PR Abermorddu 1806 Hope PR Abermorddy 1810 Hope PR Abermorddu 1837 Tithe Schedule Abermorddu 1837 Cocking Index, 13. Abermorddu 1839 FHSP 21( 1964 ), 84. Abermorddu 1875 O.S.Map. [ Cymau ] Referred to in Clwyd Historian, 31 (1993 ), 15. Also in Hope Yr : Aber-ddu 1652 NLW Wigfair 1214. Yr Avon dhŷ 1699 Lhuyd, Paroch, I, 97. Yr Aberddu 1725 FHSP, 9( 1922 ), 97. Methinks where the Black Brook runs into the Alun near Hartsheath ~ or another one? Adra-felin SJ 4042 Adravelin 1666 Worthenbury PR Radevellin 1673 Worthenbury PR Adrevelin 1674 Worthenbury PR Adafelin 1680 Worthenbury PR Adwefelin, Adrefelin 1683 Worthenbury PR Adavelin 1693 Worthenbury PR Adavelin 1700 Worthenbury PR Adavelen 1702 Worthenbury PR 4 Adruvellin 1703 Bangor Iscoed PR Adavelin 1712 Worthenbury PR Adwy’r Felin 1715 Worthenbury PR Adrefelin 1725 Worthenbury PR Adrefelin 1730 Worthenbury PR Adravelling 1779 Worthenbury PR Addravellyn 1780 Worthenbury PR Addrevelling 1792 Worthenbury PR Andravalyn 1840 O.S.Map.(Cassini) Aelwyd-uchaf SJ 0974 Aelwyd Ucha 1632 Tremeirchion PR Aylwyd Ucha 1633 Cwta Cyfarwydd, 147.
  • Brexit: Britain Has Spoken… Or Has It?

    Brexit: Britain Has Spoken… Or Has It?

    Brexit: Britain has spoken… or has it? Nicholas Donaldson, Nora Donaldson & Grace Yang Nicholas Donaldson, Nora Donaldson and Grace Yang explore issues in the design and analysis of the Brexit referendum The “Brexit” referendum on the United Kingdom’s membership of the European Union (EU) took place on 23 June 2016. The result was essentially 52-48 in favour of Leave, as the observed proportion of Leavers was 51.9%. On this basis, statements like “the majority of the UK chose to leave the EU” or “the British people have voted to leave the European Union” or “the will of the British people is…” have pervaded political discourse and newspaper articles. However, all those statements are untrue or – at best – unproven. If 100% of voters had turned out to vote, then there would have been complete information about the opinion of the UK voting population in the Brexit referendum, but this is not the case: the turnout rate was only about 72%, which means that only 37% of the eligible British electorate chose Leave. With turnout at 72%, Leave would needed to have won 69% of the vote to claim the majority of the British public was on its side with certainty. But since any statement about the whole population made on the basis of a subset carries with it an element of uncertainty, one should be compelled to perform the best possible analysis to deduce the views of the whole population from the subset. The uncertainty element should be part of the analysis. In a recent paper, What does the data of the Brexit referendum really say?1, the authors address two fundamental issues.
  • Spatial and Social Mobility in England and Wales: Moving out to Move On?

    Spatial and Social Mobility in England and Wales: Moving out to Move On?

    DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13437 Spatial and Social Mobility in England and Wales: Moving Out to Move On? Franz Buscha Emma Gorman Patrick Sturgis JULY 2020 DISCUSSION PAPER SERIES IZA DP No. 13437 Spatial and Social Mobility in England and Wales: Moving Out to Move On? Franz Buscha University of Westminster Emma Gorman University of Westminster and IZA Patrick Sturgis London School of Economics and Political Science JULY 2020 Any opinions expressed in this paper are those of the author(s) and not those of IZA. Research published in this series may include views on policy, but IZA takes no institutional policy positions. The IZA research network is committed to the IZA Guiding Principles of Research Integrity. The IZA Institute of Labor Economics is an independent economic research institute that conducts research in labor economics and offers evidence-based policy advice on labor market issues. Supported by the Deutsche Post Foundation, IZA runs the world’s largest network of economists, whose research aims to provide answers to the global labor market challenges of our time. Our key objective is to build bridges between academic research, policymakers and society. IZA Discussion Papers often represent preliminary work and are circulated to encourage discussion. Citation of such a paper should account for its provisional character. A revised version may be available directly from the author. ISSN: 2365-9793 IZA – Institute of Labor Economics Schaumburg-Lippe-Straße 5–9 Phone: +49-228-3894-0 53113 Bonn, Germany Email: [email protected] www.iza.org IZA DP No. 13437 JULY 2020 ABSTRACT Spatial and Social Mobility in England and Wales: Moving Out to Move On?* Social mobility—the extent to which social and economic position in adulthood is facilitated or constrained by family origins—has taken an increasingly prominent role in public and policy discourse.
  • Health and Care Bill Explanatory Notes

    Health and Care Bill Explanatory Notes

    HEALTH AND CARE BILL EXPLANATORY NOTES What these notes do These Explanatory Notes relate to the Health and Care Bill as introduced in the House of Commons on 6 July 2021 (Bill 140). • These Explanatory Notes have been prepared by the Department of Health and Social Care in order to assist the reader of the Health and Care Bill and to help inform debate on it. They do not form part of the Health and Care Bill and have not been endorsed by Parliament. • These Explanatory Notes explain what each part of the Health and Care Bill will mean in practice; provide background information on the development of policy; and provide additional information on how the Health and Care Bill will affect existing legislation in this area. • These Explanatory Notes might best be read alongside the Health and Care Bill. They are not, and are not intended to be, a comprehensive description of the Health and Care Bill. Bill 140–EN 58/2 Table of Contents Subject Page of these Notes Overview of the Health and Care Bill 10 Policy Background 11 Merging NHS England, Monitor and NHS Trust Development Authority 11 Mandate and financial directions to NHS England 12 Funding for service integration 14 The NHS Payment Scheme 14 Capital spending limits over Foundation Trusts 15 New NHS Trusts 16 Integrated Care Boards and Integrated Care Partnerships 17 Triple Aim 17 Duty to Cooperate 18 Joint Appointments 18 Joint Committees 18 Collaborative Commissioning 18 Secretary of State’s duty to report on workforce systems 19 Abolition of LETBs 20 Information 20 Secretary of State
  • The United Kingdom; Geography by Tom Castle • in Full, the Name We Give to the UK Is; • the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

    The United Kingdom; Geography by Tom Castle • in Full, the Name We Give to the UK Is; • the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland

    The United Kingdom; Geography by Tom Castle • In full, the name we give to the UK is; • The United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. • The UK uses the Union Jack flag to represent all 4 countries. THE UNITED KINGDOM • There are 3 countries within ‘Great Britain’ • ENGLAND • SCOTLAND • WALES • People from Great Britain are? GREAT BRITAIN • England is the largest of the countries within the United Kingdom. • It uses the Saint George’s Cross flag • What would you call someone from England? ENGLAND • Scotland is north of England. • It uses the Saint Andrew’s Cross flag, also known as the Saltire. • People from Scotland are: SCOTLAND • Wales is in the west, between England and Northern Ireland. • It uses the Red Dragon flag. • And, people from Wales are called: WALES • Within Ireland, there are 2 countries; • Northern Ireland • The Republic of Ireland IRELAND • Northern Ireland is part of the United Kingdom. • The Republic of Ireland is a separate state and is not part of the United Kingdom. • People from Northern Ireland? • People from the Republic? • Remember that ‘Northern’ is important, because it is a different nationality to Irish. IRELAND • The Union Jack is made up of the St. George, Saltire and Irish Saint Patrick flag. • The Saint Patrick is Northern Ireland’s old flag. It was used when the countries of the Union Jack were separate. • The Welsh flag is not part of the Union Jack. This is because England and Wales were 1 country before the Union Jack was created, so used the St George’s Cross. THE UNION JACK 1.
  • GDP, UK Regions and Countries: April to June 2020

    GDP, UK Regions and Countries: April to June 2020

    Statistical bulletin GDP, UK regions and countries: April to June 2020 Quarterly economic activity within the countries of the UK (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and the nine English regions (North East, North West, Yorkshire and The Humber, East Midlands, West Midlands, East of England, London, South East, and South West). Contact: Release date: Next release: Laura Requena 1 February 2021 May 2021 [email protected] +44 (0)1633 456085 Table of contents 1. Other pages in this release 2. Main points 3. Analysis of regional gross domestic product (GDP) growth 4. GDP growth by main industrial sector for the English regions and Wales 5. GDP, UK regions and countries data 6. Glossary 7. Measuring the data 8. Strengths and limitations 9. Related links Page 1 of 10 1 . Other pages in this release Methodology used to produce these estimates GDP in Scotland, published by the Scottish Government GDP in Northern Ireland, published by the Northern Ireland Statistics and Research Agency 2 . Main points In Quarter 2 (Apr to June) 2020, all four countries in the UK showed negative growth in gross domestic product (GDP): Scotland fell by 19.4%, followed by England, which fell 19.0%, Wales fell by 15.1% and Northern Ireland fell by 13.6%. Wales' growth in Quarter 2 2020 was negative 15.1%; this follows a fall in Quarter 1 (Jan to Mar) of negative 2.4%. Of the nine English regions, the largest negative growth in Quarter 2 2020 was the West Midlands with negative 21.0%, whilst the smallest decline came from London, at negative 16.6%.
  • GDP, UK Regions and Countries: January to March 2020

    GDP, UK Regions and Countries: January to March 2020

    Statistical bulletin GDP, UK regions and countries: January to March 2020 Quarterly economic activity within the countries of the UK (England, Wales, Scotland and Northern Ireland) and the nine English regions (North East, North West, Yorkshire and The Humber, East Midlands, West Midlands, East of England, London, South East, and South West). Contact: Release date: Next release: Laura Requena 9 November 2020 January 2021 [email protected] +44 (0)1633 456085 Notice 9 November 2020 We have delayed the production of the annual regional accounts measures of gross domestic product (GDP), gross value added (GVA) and gross disposable household income (GDHI) to support the production of additional coronavirus (COVID-19) statistics. We plan to publish annual regional GDP and balanced GVA in May 2021 rather than December 2020. Following this, the next publication of regional GDHI is now planned for September 2021. These delays only affect annual estimates of regional GDP and outputs that use these estimates. Quarterly GDP statistics presented in this bulletin are not affected. Data are for Quarter 1 (Jan to Mar) 2012 onwards. As earlier data are constrained to the annual regional accounts estimates (consistent with Blue Book 2019), data for earlier periods will not align to the Blue Book 2020- consistent Quarterly national accounts, published on October 2020. A consistent time series will be published in the quarterly country and regional GDP release in May 2021. Page 1 of 11 Table of contents 1. Other pages in this release 2. Main points 3. Analysis of regional GDP growth 4. GDP growth by main industrial sector for the English regions and Wales 5.