DOCSLIB.ORG

Frank Ruda Where Is

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Frank Ruda Where Is Frank Ruda Where is „auprés de nous“? On Our Comradeship with the Absolute “Aucune vérité n’est vérité d’un rapport. Au contraire, une vérité est dé-rapporté ou déliée.” (A. Badiou)1 In Immanence of Truths Badiou refers several times, four times actually, and affirmatively to a formulation, a remark, well, to what Badiou calls a “beautiful formula” of Hegel.2 This formula has been employed by him before, not frequently, but sometimes, yet it was not referenced and thus did not appear in any of the two previous Being and Event volumes, nor on that account did it appear in his Theory of the Subject. The remark or beautiful formula that Badiou is referring to reads in its French version as follows: “l’absolu est auprés de nous”3, in English it reads – not unimportantly – the “absolute… is with us … all along”4 and in German it reads as follows: “wenn es, das Absolute nicht an und für sich schon bei uns wäre”.5 The statement is part of a larger conditional sentence that states that something would not be the case if the absolute were not already “bei uns”, “with us”, “auprés de nous”. And it obviously seems to make a lot of sense that in a book – in the Immanence of Truths – which is supposed to argue neither for the universality nor for the singularity but for the absoluteness of truths6 – that is something that can neither be derived from its universal that is generic structure alone, nor from its singularity and singular embeddedness into a specific historical situation but only from its truth-ness, so to speak, from its internal infinity – this formula occurs. It seems very pointed and fitting to refer to a formula which seeks to capture nicely what Badiou thus attempts to demonstrate in this third instalment of his philosophical enterprise: namely that the very truth-character of the fragmented product of a internally infinite practice that he calls truth-procedure and that materializes as what he now addresses as an oeuvre – at least in most cases7 – entails a claim, an index of its own absoluteness. 1 Alain Badiou, Vérité et sujet. 1987-1988, Paris 2017, 22. 2 Cf. Alain Badiou, L’immanence des vérités. L’être et l’événement, 3, Paris 2018, 44, 206, 415, 529. This formulation is from p. 415. 3 G.W.F. Hegel, La phénoménologie de l’esprit, trans. by B. Bourgeois, Paris 2006, 118. 4 G.W.F. Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, trans. by A.V. Miller, Oxford 1977, 47. 5 G.W.F. Hegel, Phänomenologie des Geistes, Frankfurt a.M. 1988, 69. 6 This series is what brings together the three volumes of the “Being and Event” trilogy. One might recognize in the category of absoluteness a specific way of addressing the complex dialectic between the finite and the infinite in a new way. Cf. Badiou, Immanence, 275 and also Alain Badiou, Le fini et l’infini, Paris 2010. 7 In most cases, since, as almost always on this level, things are different with the practice of mathematics, as Badiou indicates several times in Immanence of Truths. 1 And this must mean the following: If there is a truth procedure that in most cases will manifests as a finite, singular and specific oeuvre, for this very oeuvre holds, because it is the work of (a) truth, that it will have been absolute from the very beginning.8 And this is precisely what the reference to Hegel emphasizes. The passage Badiou refers to is from the Phenomenology of Spirit and more precisely from its introduction – so, not from the general preface to what Hegel at this point believed will become his system of philosophy. And in introducing the project of the Phenomenology, Hegel in this very passage argues that we simply cannot follow what he calls the “natural assumption”9. Since if we just follow our natural belief system, we believe that what is absolute could never be close by (us) but must be located somewhere distant. But even worse, not only does our nature tell us that the absolute is in distance to us, it also makes us believe that the absolute is an object. Naturally, we tend to reify the absolute. So, if we say that we want to access or think something absolute, we in our natural common sense understanding treat it as an object, an object of our thoughts for example. Hegel demonstrates that if we take the absolute to be an object, we assume that it is in a distance from us – and vice versa –, and we thereby cannot but also assume that what we need to do is to bridge the gap that separates us from the absolute. So, if we follow our natural assumption we take cognition or thought to be this very instrument that bridges the gap. And by making all these assumptions, we fall prey to an instrumentalist conception of thought. Thinking is now supposed to function like a tool by means of which we are supposed to be able to catch or capture the absolute, “like a bird caught by a lime-twig”10, as Hegel ironically remarks. Or, like a mouse in a mousetrap. But an absolute that we could easily trick and outwit, does not seem overly absolute. 8 It is clear that this idea has been present in Badiou’s work for longer. One may just think of the very concept of the sequence that he has been expounding for almost thirty years. In what way is it related to issues we are dealing with here? Not only is each new step or each evental progression – if one risks this nomenclature – in politics possible only by measuring the limitations of (the means of) the previously taken political forms available (for example as the October Revolution solved the problems of duration and geographical expendability that occurred with the organizational form employed by and in the Paris Commune). But this measurement must necessarily also imply – if what happened say in the Paris Commune was not simply not part of the truth procedure – that already what manifested in was also infinite and we now proceed to a new type of infinity. In this sense: “an idea is always the balance sheet of an anterior idea.” Badiou, Immanence, 480. 9 Hegel, Phenomenology of Spirit, 47. 10 Ibid. 2 And the absolute is neither bird nor mouse. As Hegel himself remarks it would rather laugh at our attempted ruse if – and here it comes – the absolute were not “bei uns”, “with us, in and for itself, all along”11. It does not laugh or look down at us because it will have been with us all along. What the English translation here makes at least difficult to see and hear, if it does not disperse it altogether, in rendering the “bei uns” as “with us”, is the that the German word “bei” has a spatial meaning, a spatial connotation. It thus clearly articulates that the relation that we have to the absolute – if it is a relation at all – is a spatial one. Our relation – if it is one – to the absolute is thus, different from what one might immediately assume from almost all standard renderings of Hegel, not a temporal or historical one. The French translation that Badiou uses highlights this spatial aspect more adequately than the English one and this might actually be one of the reasons why this formula, “l’absolu est auprés de nous”, is so beautiful.12 Because it points to our comradeship with the absolute – a comrade being literally he or she who shares the same room or space. But one should here immediately ask the following question: where precisely is the absolute if it is “bei uns”, “auprés de nous”? This is a question that one might not only raise when reading Badiou’s Immanence of Truths but also when reading Hegel. Where is “auprés de nous”, “bei uns”? This is a true, i.e. difficult question since the being “bei uns” of the absolute does not make it overly easy to locate it. To begin giving an answer negatively, what is clear is the following: being “bei uns” the absolute is for Hegel as well as for Badiou not simply ahead of us, before us, “vor uns”, or “avant nous”. It is not a point or endpoint, because it is not an object; neither target that we aim for nor finishing line that we envisage and that we just would so love to reach. Rather that the absolute is “bei uns”, “aupres de nous” indicates a more complex spatial setting. The “bei” in German rather means that the absolute is beside us, at our side; it is as if it were our neighbour – notre prochain – as if it were neighbouring, nearby, maybe close-by, “prés de nous”, or maybe even “proche de nous”, if we want to refer to a formulation that appears in one of the chapter titles of The Immanence of Truths.13 Hegel’s own formulation seems to indicate that we are bordering on the absolute as much as it is a bordering on as. The absolute and us – a borderline couple. 11 Ibid. 12 As it points out that the absolute is precisely the space where there are truths or more precisely and metaphorically, the place all possible form of multiple beings. Cf. Badiou, Immanence, 295. 13 Cf. Ibid., 391. 3 In my reading, one of the tasks and impressive achievements of Badiou’s Immanence of Truths is to demonstrate from what immanent perspective the absolute can be said to be close-by, “bei uns”.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • REVIEW Alain Badiou, Theory of the Subject (New York: Continuum, 2009)
    Tomas Marttila 2010 ISSN: 1832-5203 Foucault Studies, No. 10, pp. 173-177, November 2010 REVIEW Alain Badiou, Theory of the Subject (New York: Continuum, 2009), ISBN: 978-0826496737 (1) Badiou’s Post-Political Ontology of the Subject Alongside Jacques Ranciere, Jean-Luc Nancy, Gilles Deleuze and Claude Lefort, Alain Badiou is one of the most influential and productive French philosophers of our times. Contemporary French post-foundational philosophy is split into a Lacanian and a Heideggerian stream. The Lacanian stream is more relevant than ever today, as it has been predominant in the works of, amongst others, Ernesto Laclau, Slavoj Žižek and, more recently, Jason Glynos and Yannis Stavrakakis. Marchart has observed the ‘Heideggerian’ influence above all in the works of Alain Badiou, Gilles Deleuze, Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault.1 Alain Badiou’s Theory of the Subject (French: Théorie du Sujet), published for the first time in 1982, combines both La- canian and Heideggerian philosophy and, in this regard, reflects some of the most central philosophical ideas in recent French post-foundational philosophy. In today’s globalized post-cold-war neo-liberal world, the developments in communist China and the Soviet Union described in Theory of the Subject appear out of time. This anachronism does not, however, account for Badiou’s thought as such. Based on the works of Hegel, Hei- degger and Lacan, Theory of the Subject provides a universal ontology of the political subject. Despite its slightly misleading title, Theory of the Subject is a book about politics as a particular truth event, which makes the political subject appear as the promise of the truth to come.
    [Show full text]
  • Badiou Beyond Formalization? on the Ethics of the Subject
    FILOZOFIA ___________________________________________________________________________Roč. 72, 2017, č. 9 BADIOU BEYOND FORMALIZATION? ON THE ETHICS OF THE SUBJECT JAN-JASPER PERSIJN, Centre for the History of Philosophy and Continental Philosophy (HICO), Department of Philosophy and Moral Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium PERSIJN, J.-J.: Badiou beyond Formalization? On the Ethics of the Subject FILOZOFIA 72, 2017, No. 9, pp. 724-735 The paper addresses the tension between Badiou’s claim that his theory of the sub- ject must be considered first of all as a ‘formal’ theory, and a certain genealogical history of his notion of the subject. In the latter case, it seems that a very specific political experience has played a crucial role (at least) for Badiou in his early con- ception of the subject. More particularly, the paper addresses this tension from an ethical perspective. As for the claim repeatedly made in his work (that the subject poses in the first place a formal problem), one can identify an implicitly ethical disposition in the formalization itself. At the same time, there are several formula- tions in his writings that seem to exceed the formal level. The paper examines four concepts or formulations appearing in his three main books (Theory of the Subject, Being and Event, Logics of Worlds) that seem to express a more or less explicit ethical dimension, namely his theory of affects, the principle ‘to decide the unde- cidable’, the contrast between ‘fidelity’ and ‘confidence’ and Badiou’s answer to the question What is it to live? The paper’s aim is to pinpoint the difference be- tween the ethical stance implied in the formal description of Badiou’s theory of the subject and an explicit ‘ethics of the subject’.
    [Show full text]
  • A Musing with Alain Badiou À La 'Dialogue Between a Chinese
    Volume Four, Number One A Musing with Alain Badiou à la ‘Dialogue Between a Chinese Philosopher and a French Philosopher’,1 or, An Exercise in Self-Reference Kyoo Lee John Jay College, CUNY, NYC Free Badiou! The Same, Sex Problem in Alain Badiou on Love, and One Possible, Queer Solution from the Master Himself […] or Herself? 1 The event: ‘Alain Badiou: Dialogue between a Chinese Philosopher and French Philosopher’, 13 December 2014, The Educational Alliance, NYC. Badiou Studies 2 And “What is Love?” Alain Badiou asks and answers: Page | 124 […] The question of sex is the primary obscurity, a difference thinkable only at the cost of a laborious determination of identity that it puts to work. Let us add that contemporary philosophy addresses itself at all times to women. It might even be suspected that it is, as discourse, partly a strategy of seduction. Cogito Interruptus:3 Or subtraction, you mean? Besides, it is from the bias of love that philosophy touches upon the sexes, to the extent that it is to Plato that Lacan must look for what hold thought has over the love of transference. Such or any, as one might already know, truth is essentially an empty category for Badiou – it is produced, in Badiou’s own words, as a hole in knowledge, an unnameable element. It is essentially something which is indiscernible to either language or mathematical counting. Hence, Badiou’s recourse to a philosophy of foundations grounded on mathematical logic 2 Alain Badiou, “What is Love?,” UMBR (a), 1996, p.37. 3 Kyoo Lee, ‘Cogito Interruptus: The Epistolary Body in the Elisabeth-Descartes Correspondence, June 22, 1645-November 3, 1645’, philoSOPHIA 1.2 (2011), 173-94.
    [Show full text]
  • Six Political Philosophies in Search of a Virus: Critical Perspectives on the Coronavirus Pandemic
    LSE ‘Europe in Question’ Discussion Paper Series Six political philosophies in search of a virus: Critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic Gerard Delanty LEQS Paper No. 156/2020 May 2020 Editorial Board Dr Bob Hancké Dr Vassilis Monastiriotis Dr Sonja Avlijas Dr Cristóbal Garibay-Petersen Dr Pieter Tuytens Mr Toon Van Overbeke All views expressed in this paper are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the editors or the LSE. © Gerard Delanty Six political philosophies in search of a virus: Critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic Gerard Delanty * Abstract The Coronavirus (Covid-19) poses interesting questions for social and political thought. These include the nature and limits of the ethical responsibility of the state, personal liberty and collective interests, human dignity, and state surveillance. As many countries throughout the world declared states of emergency, some of the major questions in political philosophy become suddenly highly relevant. Foucault’s Writings on biopolitical securitization and Agamben’s notion of the state of exception take on a new reality, as do the classical arguments of utilitarianism and libertarianism. In this paper, I discuss six main philosophical responses to the pandemic, including provocative interventions made by Agamben, Badieu, and Zizek, Latour on the governance of life and death as Well as the Kantian perspective of Habermas on human dignity. Keywords: Agamben, Badieu, Utilitarianism, Habermas, libertarianism, Latour, nudge theory, Zizek, * School of Law, Politics and Sociology, University of Sussex Email: [email protected] Acknowledgments This is an expanded version of a short essay that appeared in the Hong Kong Review of Books in May 2020.
    [Show full text]
  • Briefings on Existence
    Briefings on Existence A Short Treatise on Transitory Ontology Alain Badiou TRANSLATED. LDITLD, AND WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY Norman Madarasz State University of New York Press Tins work is published with support from the French Ministry of Culture / National Book Center. Ouvrage public arec I'aide du Ministere fran^ais charge de la Culture’ / Centre national du livre. Originally published in France under the title Court Traitc d’ontologie transitoire Copyright: © 1998, Editions de Seuil All rights reserved English translation made by agreement with Editions du Seuil Published by State University of New York Press, Albany English translation © 2006 State University of New York All rights reserved Printed in the United States of America For information, address State University of New York Press 194 Washington Avenue, Suite 305, Albany, NY 12210-2384 Production by Diane Ganeles Marketing by Susan M. Petrie Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Badiou, Alain. [Court traite d'ontologie transitoire. English] Briefings on existence : a short treatise on transitory ontology / Alain Badiou ; translated, edited and with an introduction by Norman Madarasz. p. cm. — (SUNY series, intersections— philosophy and critical theory) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-7914-6803-6 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7914-6803-8 (hardcover : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-7914-6804-3 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-7914-6804-6 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Ontology. 1. Madarasz, Norman. II. Title. III. Intersections (Albany, NY) BD3 12.B3213 2006 I I I— dc22 2005033878 10 98765432 I I call “transitory ontology” the ontology unfolding between the sci­ ence of Being qua Being, that is, the theory of the pure manifold, and the science of appearing, that is, the logic of the consistency of actually presented universes.
    [Show full text]
  • Philosophy (PHIL) 1
    Philosophy (PHIL) 1 PHILOSOPHY (PHIL) PHIL 3000 Plato's Metaphysics (4 Credits) A systematic study of Plato's Middle and Late Period Dialogues that focuses on his arguments for the existence of abstract objects and the development of Plato's theory of Forms. Prerequisite: At least Junior standing or permission of instructor. PHIL 3003 Plato's Theory of Knowledge (4 Credits) A systematic investigation of Plato's treatments of knowledge throughout the dialogues with a focus on the theory of recollection, Forms as objects of knowledge, the relationship between the Forms and perceptual experience, and the challenges posed by notions of true and false belief. Prerequisites: At least Junior standing or permission of instructor. PHIL 3005 Cosmopolitics (4 Credits) This class will be a close reading of Plato's dialogue Timaeus, with a special focus on the cosmological, theological, and political dimensions of the text. PHIL 3010 Great Thinkers: Aristotle (4 Credits) A study of Aristotle's central theories and doctrines. Prerequisite: junior standing or instructor's permission. PHIL 3011 Great Thinkers: Virginia Woolf (4 Credits) In this course we will read Virginia Woolf as a philosopher. We will discuss her philosophy of nature, knowledge, art, politics, science, sensation, gender, and materialism throughout her fiction and non-fiction writings. PHIL 3023 Great Thinkers: Maimonides: Politics, Prophecy and Providence (4 Credits) Using "The Guide for the Perplexed" as our central text, we explore the complex philosophical ideas of Moses Maimonides (1135-1204), one of the central figures in medieval philosophy and Jewish thought. Our study includes analyses of his ideas on principles of faith, human perfection, intellectual vs.
    [Show full text]
  • THE EVENT in DELEUZE Alain Badiou
    PARRHESIA NUMBER 2 • 2007 • 37–44 THE EVENT IN DELEUZE Alain Badiou Translated by Jon Roffe1 Deleuze always paid tribute to Sartre as the figure who, during the thirties and forties, woke French philosophy from its academic slumbers. He considered the 1937 article, ‘The Transcendence of the Ego’, the origin of everything: why? It is because, in this text, Sartre proposes the idea—I am citing Deleuze—of ‘an impersonal transcendental field, having the form neither of a personal synthetic consciousness nor subjective identity—the subject, to the contrary, always being constituted.’2 I want to emphasise this remark of Deleuze’s all the more insofar as the motif of an impersonal transcendental field is dominant throughout my Greater Logic, where it is effectuated, in the finest technical detail, as a logic of appearance or worlds.3 Deleuze remarked also that Sartre had been prevented from thinking all of the consequences of his idea because he had attached the impersonal field to a (self)-consciousness. This is absolutely correct. We could also say: Sartre continued to believe in an auto-unification of the transcendental. He did not expose the subject to the alea of a pure Outside. Now, one of the names of the Outside is ‘event’. This is why the event, as that to which the power [puissance] of a thought is devoted, and/ or that from which this power proceeds, has, after Sartre, become a common term for the greater number of contemporary philosophers. Other than through the critique of the phenomenology of consciousness, this term has been transmitted to us, on the side of truth-procedures, by the lasting fragment—in the 20th century—of four entangled motifs: that, in politics, of Revolution; in love, of erotic liberation; in the arts, of performance; and in the sciences, of the epistemological break.
    [Show full text]
  • Download File
    Translating Revolution in Twentieth-Century China and France Diana King Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY 2017 © 2017 Diana King All rights reserved ABSTRACT Translating Revolution in Twentieth-Century China and France Diana King In “Translating Revolution in Twentieth-Century China and France,” I examine how the two countries translated each other’s revolutions during critical moments of political and cultural crisis (the 1911 Revolution, the May Fourth Movement (1919), the Cultural Revolution (1966-76), and May 1968 in France), and subsequently (or simultaneously), how that knowledge was mobilized in practice and shaped the historical contexts in which it was produced. Drawing upon a broad range of discourses including political journals, travel narratives, films and novels in French, English and Chinese, I argue that translation served as a key site of knowledge production, shaping the formulation of various political and cultural projects from constructing a Chinese national identity to articulating women’s rights to thinking about radical emancipation in an era of decolonization. While there have been isolated studies on the influence of the French Revolution in early twentieth-century China, and the impact of the Chinese Cultural Revolution on the development of French Maoism and French theory in the sixties, there have been few studies that examine the circulation of revolutionary ideas and practices across multiple historical moments and cultural contexts. In addition, the tendency of much current scholarship to focus exclusively on the texts of prominent French or Chinese intellectuals overlooks the vital role played by translation, and by non-elite thinkers, writers, students and migrant workers in the cross-fertilization of revolutionary discourses and practices.
    [Show full text]
  • Plato's Republic
    PLATO’S REPUBLIC PLATO’S REPUBLIC A Dialogue in Sixteen Chapters, with a Prologue and an Epilogue ALAIN BADIOU Translated by Susan Spitzer polity First published in French as La République de Platon © Librairie Arthème Fayard, 2012 This English edition © Polity Press, 2012 Polity Press 65 Bridge Street Cambridge CB2 1UR, UK Polity Press 350 Main Street Malden, MA 02148, USA All rights reserved. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purpose of criticism and review, no part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopy- ing, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. ISBN: 978-0-7456-6352-4 A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library. The publisher has used its best endeavours to ensure that the URLs for external websites referred to in this book are correct and active at the time of going to press. However, the publisher has no responsibility for the websites and can make no guarantee that a site will remain live or that the content is or will remain appropriate. Every effort has been made to trace all copyright holders, but if any have been inadvertently overlooked the publisher will be pleased to include any necessary credits in any subsequent reprint or edition. For further information on Polity, visit our website: www.politybooks.com CONTENTS 7/426 The numbers and letters in parentheses after each chapter title (e.g. 327a) refer to a division of the text into sections, each usually about ten lines long.
    [Show full text]
  • Editorial: Postanarchism
    Editorial: Postanarchism SAUL NEWMAN Postanarchism is emerging as an important new current in anarchist thought, and it is the source of growing interest and debate amongst anarchist activists and scholars alike, as well as in broader academic circles. Given the number of internet sites, discussion groups, and new books and journal publications appearing on postanarchism, it is time that the challenges it poses to classical anarchist thought and practice are taken more seriously. Postanarchism refers to a wide body of theory – encompassing political theory, philosophy, aesthetics, literature and film studies – which attempts to explore new directions in anarchist thought and politics. While it includes a number of different perspectives and trajectories, the central contention of postanarchism is that classical anarchist philosophy must take account of new theoretical directions and cultural phenomena, in particular, postmodernity and poststructuralism. While these theoretical categories have had a major impact on different areas of scholarship and thought, as well as politics, anarchism tends to have remained largely resistant to these developments and continues to work within an Enlightenment humanist epistemological framework1 which many see as being in need of updating. At the same time, anarchism – as a form of political theory and practice – is becoming increasingly important to radical struggles and global social movements today, to a large extent supplanting Marxism. Postanarchism seeks to revitalise anarchist theory in light of these new struggles and forms of resistance. However, rather than dismissing the tradition of classical anarchism, postanarchism, on the contrary, seeks to explore its potential and radicalise its possibilities. It remains entirely consistent, I would suggest, with the libertarian and egal- itarian horizon of anarchism; yet it seeks to broaden the terms of anti-authoritarian thought to include a critical analysis of language, discourse, culture and new modalities of power.
    [Show full text]
  • Being, Appearing, and the Platonic Idea in Badiou and Plato
    Open Philosophy 2019; 2: 599–613 Experience in a New Key Sandy Brander* Being, Appearing, and the Platonic Idea in Badiou and Plato https://doi.org/10.1515/opphil-2019-0044 Received August 03, 2019; accepted November 07, 2019 Abstract: This essay considers the ambiguous sense in which Badiou is a Platonist. It alleviates this ambiguity by considering how two characteristics of Platonism are treated in the metaphysics of Being and Event: (1) the split between being/appearing, and (2) Platonic Ideas. It considers how in Badiou and Plato’s metaphysics the treatment of both these characteristics of Platonism is comparable. Accordingly, it compares both such characteristics in relation to Being and Event and the Theaetetus and Phaedo, and, using concepts from each philosopher, explores three possible ways in which being/appearing and Platonic Ideas may be interrelated, thereby constituting a philosophy of experience. These explorations necessitate parallel consideration of how the sense in which Badiou is a Platonist is determinable by the interrelation of Platonic Ideas with being/ appearing in his metaphysics. It is determined that how being/appearing and Platonic Ideas interrelate in Badiou is markedly different from how they do so in Plato, making it questionable whether Badiou is a Platonist in this sense. However, it is indicated that an esoteric sense in which Badiou is a Platonist (the dialectic of the One and the multiple) has been considered throughout this essay, and that more such senses deserve consideration. Keywords: Platonism, idealism, ontology, count-as-one, multiple, set-theory The ‘Platonic gesture’1 which Badiou makes, against the rejection of Plato in particular and metaphysics in general by continental and analytic philosophers alike, might be interpreted as something of a pose.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction Christian SORACE, Ivan FRANCESCHINI, and Nicholas LOUBERE
    AFTERLIVES OF CHINESE COMMUNISM 1 Introduction Christian SORACE, Ivan FRANCESCHINI, and Nicholas LOUBERE ere we are in the twenty-first century, among the shipwrecks of utopian voyages, with faded maps to places that no longer exist. Maoist China seems Hlike one such place, with its dreams, aspirations, and terrors, erased under the shimmering miracle of capitalist development. But contemporary China is also a place of state-backed exploitation of labour that produces cheap commodities for global markets, including the electronic goods that have become the prostheses of modern life. The language of communism and class struggle has long been relegated to the past. When discussions of the staggering inequalities of wealth, corruption, and other adverse consequences of post-Maoist capitalism gain momentum, they are censored. Moreover, to read Marx and debate the legacy of Maoism in China is not permitted outside of highly circumscribed official channels—recently, it has even led to the repression and harassment of idealistic students who took Maoism at its word. The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) carefully guards its legacy and vocabulary of legitimation. Against what it labels as ‘historical nihilism’ (lishi xuwuzhuyi)—that is to say, the rogue circulation of concepts with the potential to inspire and incite new ways of being in the world—it presents a story of China’s triumph under CCP rule. This edited volume argues that there is much we can learn by revisiting the complicated and contested legacies of Chinese communism. The dogmatic reification of Chinese communism in China, and its Cold War vilification in liberal democracies, makes this critical excavation all the more necessary.
    [Show full text]