DOCSLIB.ORG

Denial-Of-Service (Dos) Attacks

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Denial-Of-Service (Dos) Attacks Denial-of-Service (DoS) Attacks Chien-Chung Shen [email protected] Denial-of-Service (DoS) • Defined in NIST Computer Security Incident Handling Guide as “an action that prevents or impairs the authorized use of networks, systems, or applications by exhausting resources such as central processing units (CPU), memory, bandwidth, and disk space.” • Attempt to compromise availability by hindering or blocking completely the provision of some service • Attempt to exhaust some critical resource associated with the service • Example: flooding a Web server with many spurious requests that it is unable to respond to valid requests from users in a timely manner DoS Attacks • Potency steadily increases over time due to Internet bandwidth growth – 400 MBps (2000) -> 100 GBps (2010) -> 300 GBps (Spamhaus [http://www.theregister.co.uk/ 2013/03/27/spamhaus_ddos_megaflood/], 2013) – thousands of attacks each day – massive flooding attacks in 50 GBps are powerful enough to exceed bandwidth capacity of most intended targets • A form of attack on the availability of some service Categories of Resources 1. Network bandwidth relates to capacity of network links connecting a server to Internet (ISP) 2. System resources aims to overload or crash network handling software 3. Application resources typically involves valid requests, each of which consumes significant resources, thus limiting the ability of server to respond to requests from other users Example (1) DoS on Network Bandwidth • Network bandwidth related to capacity of links connecting server to ISP • More traffic arrives at ISP’s routers over higher- capacity links than links to server -> packets dropped at ISP routers • Malicious traffic generated by DoS attacks overwhelms legitimate traffic -> denying legitimate users access to server (2) DoS on System Resources • Overload/crash network handling software • Rather than consuming bandwidth with large volumes of traffic, – specific types of packets are sent that consume limited available resources • temporary buffer used to hold arriving packets • table of open connections: TCP SYN spoofing attack • similar memory data structures – packets whose structure triggers bugs in network handling software, causing it to crash: termed poison packet • ping of death and teardrop attacks target bugs in Windows 9x systems’ code than handles ICMP echo request and packet fragmentation (3) DoS on Application Resources • Attacks on specific application (e.g., Web server) typically involves valid requests each of which consumes significant resources • This then limits ability of server to respond to requests from other users • Aka, cyberslam, e.g., database queries • Requests that trigger bugs in server program, causing it to crash Classic DoS Attack (A) Flooding ping (ICMP echo request) • Aim to overwhelm the capacity of network connection to the target organization • Traffic can be handled by higher capacity links on the path, but packets are discarded as capacity decreases • Network performance is noticeably affected • Two disadvantages to attackers! • source of attack is identified unless a spoofed address is used • response packets back to attacker Source Address Spoofing • Use forged source addresses – usually via raw socket interface [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Raw_socket] on OS to make attacking systems harder to identify • Attacker use randomly selected, usually different, source addresses for each packet • Congestion would still occur in router connected to the final, lower capacity link • Response back to different “sources” triggering even more “error” packets from real hosts or ICMP “destination unreachable” packet from unknown hosts [backscatter traffic] • To identify source needs to query flow information through routers • Egree filtering – filtering on router to ensure source address (or at least source network address) is valid Classic DoS Attack (B) SYN spoofing • Attacks ability of server to respond to future connection requests by overflowing the tables used to manage such connections; thus legitimate users are denied access to server • An attack on system resources, specifically the network handling code in the operating system TCP 3-Way handshake • Reliable transport protocol over best-effort (unreliable) IP – sequence number – timeout and retransmission – Need to maintain state TCP SYN Spoofing • Attacker sends SYNs with spoofed source addresses • Server records states of TCP connection requests and respond SYN +ACK to “claimed” source addresses – for valid system at the forged address: it responds with RST to cancel unknown connection request; when server receives RST, it cancel connection request and remove saved state – for no system at forged address: no reply; server sends SYN+ACK several times • between when original SYN received and when server assumes connection failed, server is using one entry in TCP connection table • many forged connection requests -> many entries used Flooding vs. SYN Spoofing • Volume of network traffic – SYN spoofing is lower • How much lower? – high enough to keep TCP connection table full Flooding Attacks • Classified based on network protocol used • Aim to overload network capacity on some link to a server or server’s ability to handle/respond to traffic – valid traffic has low probability of surviving discard/accessing server • Virtually any type of network packet can be used • ICMP echo request – traditionally network administrators allow such packets into networks because ping is a useful network diagnostic tool • UDP – directed to some port number on the target system • TCP SYN – total volume of packets is aim of attack rather than system code (1) ICMP Flooding • Recently, ICMP echo requests Type Code description 0 0 echo reply (ping) are filtered by firewall 3 0 dest. network unreachable 3 1 dest host unreachable • As some ICMP packets are 3 2 dest protocol unreachable 3 3 dest port unreachable critical to the healthy operation 3 6 dest network unknown of Internet, filtering these 3 7 dest host unknown 4 0 source quench (congestion packets may degrade or break control - not used) 8 0 echo request (ping) normal Internet behavior 9 0 route advertisement 10 0 router discovery • e.g., ICMP destination 11 0 TTL expired unreachable and ICMP TTL 12 0 bad IP header expired (2) UDP Flood • Send UDP segment directly to some port #: e.g., 7 (echo service) • May use spoofed source addresses (3) TCP SYN Flood • Total volume of packets is aim of attack, rather than system code – SYN flooding vs. SYN spoofing • TCP connection requests with either real or spoofed source addresses Indirect Flooding Attacks • Flooding attacks are limited in total traffic volume generated on single system, where attacker is easier to trace • More sophisticated attacks involve multiple attackers • By directing attacks through intermediaries, attacker is distanced from target and harder to be located and identified 1. Distributed DoS attacks 2. Reflector attacks 3. Amplifier attacks Distributed DoS (DDoS) • Use of multiple systems to generate attack traffic • Attacker uses a flaw in OS or in a common application to gain access and installs their program on zombies (via automated infection tools) • Large collections of such systems under control of one attacker’s control can be created, forming a botnet Architecture of DDoS Attack Control hierarchy Example DDoS Tool • Tribe Flood network (TFN) and TFN2K – two-layer command architecture – launch ICMP/SYN/UDP flood – communicate via encrypted TCP/UDP/ICMP packets • IRC-based • HTTP-based • The best defense against being an unwitting participant in DDoS attack – prevent system from being compromised Reflector/Amplifier Attacks • In contrast to DDoS, where intermediaries are compromised nodes running attacker’s programs, reflector/amplifier attacks use network systems functioning normally • Attacker sends packet to server with spoofed source IP address (target); server responds to spoofed source IP address • When many packets sent to many servers with the same spoofed source address, the resulting flood responses overwhelm target’s link • Normal server are being used and their response is entirely conventional, attacks can be easier to deploy and harder to trace back to actual attacker Reflection Attacks • Attacker sends packets to a known service on the intermediary with a spoofed source address of the actual target system • When intermediary responds, the response is sent to the target, i.e., “reflects” the attack off intermediary (reflector) • Goal is to generate enough volumes of packets to flood the link to the target system without alerting the intermediary – use service that creates larger response packets than original request; e.g., DNS (UDP) • How to defend against these attacks? – block spoofed source packets DNS Reflection Attack • Between DNS and echo service (#7) – attacker sends query to DNS with spoofed IP source address (IP address of target): j.k.l.m – DNS responds to j.k.l.m:7 – target echoes back – DNS responds again, ……… Q: How reflector attacks are prevented ? A: network/host-based firewall rules to reject suspicious combination of source/destination ports TCP SYN Reflection Attack • Attacker sends SYN packets to spoofed source address (i.e., the target) to intermediaries • Intermediaries respond with SYN+ACK to spoofed source address (the target) • Target responds with RST for any that get through • Overwhelm target’s network link (not to exhaust its network handling resources) Amplification Attacks • A variant of reflection attacks, also involves sending
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Double Horizon Defense Design for Robust Regulation of Malicious Traffic
    University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Departmental Papers (ESE) Department of Electrical & Systems Engineering August 2006 A Double Horizon Defense Design for Robust Regulation of Malicious Traffic Ying Xu University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Roch A. Guérin University of Pennsylvania, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/ese_papers Recommended Citation Ying Xu and Roch A. Guérin, "A Double Horizon Defense Design for Robust Regulation of Malicious Traffic", . August 2006. Copyright 2006 IEEE. In Proceedings of the Second IEEE Communications Society/CreateNet International Conference on Security and Privacy in Communication Networks (SecureComm 2006). This material is posted here with permission of the IEEE. Such permission of the IEEE does not in any way imply IEEE endorsement of any of the University of Pennsylvania's products or services. Internal or personal use of this material is permitted. However, permission to reprint/republish this material for advertising or promotional purposes or for creating new collective works for resale or redistribution must be obtained from the IEEE by writing to [email protected]. By choosing to view this document, you agree to all provisions of the copyright laws protecting it. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/ese_papers/190 For more information, please contact [email protected]. A Double Horizon Defense Design for Robust Regulation of Malicious Traffic Abstract Deploying defense mechanisms in routers holds promises for protecting infrastructure resources such as link bandwidth or router buffers against network Denial-of-Service (DoS) attacks. However, in spite of their efficacy against bruteforce flooding attacks, existing outer-basedr defenses often perform poorly when confronted to more sophisticated attack strategies.
    [Show full text]
  • Speeding up Correlation Search for Binary Data
    Speeding up Correlation Search for Binary Data Lian Duan and W. Nick Street [email protected] Management Sciences Department The University of Iowa Abstract Finding the most interesting correlations in a collection of items is essential for problems in many commercial, medical, and scientific domains. Much previous re- search focuses on finding correlated pairs instead of correlated itemsets in which all items are correlated with each other. Though some existing methods find correlated itemsets of any size, they suffer from both efficiency and effectiveness problems in large datasets. In our previous paper [10], we propose a fully-correlated itemset (FCI) framework to decouple the correlation measure from the need for efficient search. By wrapping the desired measure in our FCI framework, we take advantage of the desired measure’s superiority in evaluating itemsets, eliminate itemsets with irrelevant items, and achieve good computational performance. However, FCIs must start pruning from 2-itemsets unlike frequent itemsets which can start the pruning from 1-itemsets. When the number of items in a given dataset is large and the support of all the pairs cannot be loaded into the memory, the IO cost O(n2) for calculating correlation of all the pairs is very high. In addition, users usually need to try different correlation thresholds and the cost of processing the Apriori procedure each time for a different threshold is very high. Consequently, we propose two techniques to solve the efficiency problem in this paper. With respect to correlated pair search, we identify a 1-dimensional monotone prop- erty of the upper bound of any good correlation measure, and different 2-dimensional monotone properties for different types of correlation measures.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining Web User Behaviors to Detect Application Layer Ddos Attacks
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE, VOL. 9, NO. 4, APRIL 2014 985 Mining Web User Behaviors to Detect Application Layer DDoS Attacks Chuibi Huang1 1Department of Automation, USTC Key laboratory of network communication system and control Hefei, China Email: [email protected] Jinlin Wang1, 2, Gang Wu1, Jun Chen2 2Institute of Acoustics, Chinese Academy of Sciences National Network New Media Engineering Research Center Beijing, China Email: {wangjl, chenj}@dsp.ac.cn Abstract— Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks than TCP or UDP-based attacks, requiring fewer network have caused continuous critical threats to the Internet connections to achieve their malicious purposes. The services. DDoS attacks are generally conducted at the MyDoom worm and the CyberSlam are all instances of network layer. Many DDoS attack detection methods are this type attack [2, 3]. focused on the IP and TCP layers. However, they are not suitable for detecting the application layer DDoS attacks. In The challenges of detecting the app-DDoS attacks can this paper, we propose a scheme based on web user be summarized as the following aspects: browsing behaviors to detect the application layer DDoS • The app-DDoS attacks make use of higher layer attacks (app-DDoS). A clustering method is applied to protocols such as HTTP to pass through most of extract the access features of the web objects. Based on the the current anomaly detection systems designed access features, an extended hidden semi-Markov model is for low layers. proposed to describe the browsing behaviors of web user. • Along with flooding, App-DDoS traces the The deviation from the entropy of the training data set average request rate of the legitimate user and uses fitting to the hidden semi-Markov model can be considered as the abnormality of the observed data set.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities
    THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS This PDF is available at http://nap.edu/12651 SHARE Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities DETAILS 390 pages | 6x9 | PAPERBACK ISBN 978-0-309-13850-5 | DOI 10.17226/12651 AUTHORS BUY THIS BOOK William A. Owens, Kenneth W. Dam, and Herbert S. Lin, editors; Committee on Offensive Information Warfare; National Research Council FIND RELATED TITLES Visit the National Academies Press at NAP.edu and login or register to get: – Access to free PDF downloads of thousands of scientific reports – 10% off the price of print titles – Email or social media notifications of new titles related to your interests – Special offers and discounts Distribution, posting, or copying of this PDF is strictly prohibited without written permission of the National Academies Press. (Request Permission) Unless otherwise indicated, all materials in this PDF are copyrighted by the National Academy of Sciences. Copyright © National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of CYBerattacK CapaBILITIes William A. Owens, Kenneth W. Dam, and Herbert S. Lin, Editors Committee on Offensive Information Warfare Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences Copyright National Academy of Sciences. All rights reserved. Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Gov- erning Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engi- neering, and the Institute of Medicine.
    [Show full text]
  • AUGUST 2005 43 Your Defense Is Offensive STEVE MANZUIK EDITOR ;Login: Is the Official WORKPLACE Rik Farrow Magazine of the [email protected] USENIX Association
    A UGUST 2005 VOLUME 30 NUMBER 4 THE USENIX MAGAZINE OPINION Musings RIK FARROWS Conference Password Sniffing ABE SINGER SYSADMIN The Inevitability of Xen JON CROWCROFT, KEIR FRASER, STEVEN HAND, IAN PRATT, AND ANDREW WARFIELD Secure Automated File Transfer MARK MCCULLOUGH SAN vs. NAS for Oracle: A Tale of Two Protocols ADAM LEVIN Practical Perl ADAM TUROFF ISPadmin ROBERT HASKINS L AW Primer on Cybercrime Laws DANI EL L. APPELMAN SECURITY Forensics for System Administrators SEAN PEISERT Your Defense Is Offensive STEVE MANZUIK WORKPLACE Marketing after the Bubble EMILY W. SALUS AND PETER H. SALUS BOOK REVIEWS Book Reviews RIK FAROWS USENIX NOTES SAGE Update DAVID PARTER ...and much more CONFERENCES 2005 USENIX Annual Technical Conference 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’05) 6th IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications (WMCSA 2004) The Advanced Computing Systems Association Upcoming Events INTERNET MEASUREMENT CONFERENCE 2005 4TH USENIX CONFERENCE ON FILE AND (IMC ’05) STORAGE TECHNOLOGIES (FAST ’05) Sponsored by ACM SIGCOMM in cooperation with USENIX Sponsored by USENIX in cooperation with ACM SIGOPS, IEEE Mass Storage Systems Technical Committee (MSSTC), OCTOBER 19–21, 2005, NEW ORLEANS, LA, USA and IEEE TCOS http://www.usenix.org/imc05 DECEMBER 14–16, 2005, SAN FRANCISCO, CA, USA http://www.usenix.org/fast05 ACM/IFIP/USENIX 6TH INTERNATIONAL MIDDLEWARE CONFERENCE 3RD SYMPOSIUM ON NETWORKED SYSTEMS NOVEMBER 28–DECEMBER 2, 2005, GRENOBLE, FRANCE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION (NSDI ’06) http://middleware05.objectweb.org
    [Show full text]
  • Funkhouser, C, Baldwin.S, Prehistoric Digital Poetry. Anarchaeologyof
    Prehistoric Digital Poetry MODERN AND CONTEMPORARY POETICS Series Editors Charles Bernstein Hank Lazer Series Advisory Board Maria Damon Rachel Blau DuPlessis Alan Golding Susan Howe Nathaniel Mackey Jerome McGann Harryette Mullen Aldon Nielsen Marjorie Perloff Joan Retallack Ron Silliman Lorenzo Thomas Jerry Ward Prehistoric Digital Poetry An Archaeology of Forms, 1959–1995 C. T. FUNKHOUSER THE UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA PRESS Tuscaloosa Copyright © 2007 The University of Alabama Press Tuscaloosa, Alabama 35487-0380 All rights reserved Manufactured in the United States of America Typeface: Minion ∞ The paper on which this book is printed meets the minimum requirements of American National Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials, ANSI Z39.48-1984. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data Funkhouser, Chris. Prehistoric digital poetry : an archaeology of forms, 1959–1995 / C. T. Funkhouser. p. cm. — (Modern and contemporary poetics) Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN-13: 978-0-8173-1562-7 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8173-1562-4 (cloth : alk. paper) ISBN-13: 978-0-8173-5422-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) ISBN-10: 0-8173-5422-0 (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Computer poetry—History and criticism. 2. Computer poetry—Technique. 3. Interactive multimedia. 4. Hypertext systems. I. Title. PN1059.C6F86 2007 808.10285—dc22 2006037512 Portions of I-VI by John Cage have been reprinted by permission of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass, pp. 1, 2, 5, 103, 435. Copyright © 1990 by the President and Fellows of Harvard College. To my comrades in the present and to cybernetic literary paleontologists of the mythic future “The poem is a machine,” said that famous man, and so I’m building one.
    [Show full text]
  • Sorted by Artist Music Listing 2005 112 Hot & Wet (Radio)
    Sorted by Artist Music Listing 2005 112 Hot & Wet (Radio) WARNING 112 Na Na Na (Super Clean w. Rap) 112 Right Here For You (Radio) (63 BPM) 311 First Straw (80 bpm) 311 Love Song 311 Love Song (Cirrus Club Mix) 702 Blah Blah Blah Blah (Radio Edit) 702 Star (Main) .38 Special Fade To Blue .38 Special Hold On Loosely 1 Giant Leap My Culture (Radio Edit) 10cc I'm Not In Love 1910 Fruitgum Company Simon Says 2 Bad Mice Bombscare ('94 US Remix) 2 Skinnee J's Grow Up [Radio Edit] 2 Unlimited Do What's Good For Me 2 Unlimited Faces 2 Unlimited Get Ready For This 2 Unlimited Here I Go 2 Unlimited Jump For Joy 2 Unlimited Let The Beat Control Your Body 2 Unlimited Magic Friend 2 Unlimited Maximum Overdrive 2 Unlimited No Limit 2 Unlimited No One 2 Unlimited Nothing Like The Rain 2 Unlimited Real Thing 2 Unlimited Spread Your Love 2 Unlimited Tribal Dance 2 Unlimited Twilight Zone 2 Unlimited Unlimited Megajam 2 Unlimited Workaholic 2% of Red Tide Body Bagger 20 Fingers Lick It 2funk Apsyrtides (original mix) 2Pac Thugz Mansion (Radio Edit Clean) 2Pac ft Trick Daddy Still Ballin' (Clean) 1 of 197 Sorted by Artist Music Listing 2005 3 Doors Down Away From The Sun (67 BPM) 3 Doors Down Be Like That 3 Doors Down Here Without You (Radio Edit) 3 Doors Down Kryptonite 3 Doors Down Road I'm On 3 Doors Down When I'm Gone 3k Static Shattered 3LW & P Diddy I Do (Wanna Get Close To You) 3LW ft Diddy & Loan I Do (Wanna Get Close To You) 3LW ft Lil Wayne Neva Get Enuf 4 Clubbers Children (Club Radio Edit) 4 Hero Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • A Defense Framework Against Denial-Of-Service in Computer Networks
    A DEFENSE FRAMEWORK AGAINST DENIAL-OF-SERVICE IN COMPUTER NETWORKS by Sherif Khattab M.Sc. Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, USA, 2004 B.Sc. Computer Engineering, Cairo University, Egypt, 1998 Submitted to the Graduate Faculty of the Department of Computer Science in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Pittsburgh 2008 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER SCIENCE This dissertation was presented by Sherif Khattab It was defended on June 25th, 2008 and approved by Prof. Rami Melhem, Department of Computer Science Prof. Daniel Moss´e,Department of Computer Science Prof. Taieb Znati, Department of Computer Science Prof. Prashant Krishnamurthy, School of Information Sciences Dissertation Advisors: Prof. Rami Melhem, Department of Computer Science, Prof. Daniel Moss´e,Department of Computer Science ii A DEFENSE FRAMEWORK AGAINST DENIAL-OF-SERVICE IN COMPUTER NETWORKS Sherif Khattab, PhD University of Pittsburgh, 2008 Denial-of-Service (DoS) is a computer security problem that poses a serious challenge to trustworthiness of services deployed over computer networks. The aim of DoS attacks is to make services unavailable to legitimate users, and current network architectures allow easy-to-launch, hard-to-stop DoS attacks. Particularly challenging are the service-level DoS attacks, whereby the victim service is flooded with legitimate-like requests, and the jamming attack, in which wireless communication is blocked by malicious radio interference. These attacks are overwhelming even for massively-resourced services, and effective and efficient defenses are highly needed. This work contributes a novel defense framework, which I call dodging, against service- level DoS and wireless jamming.
    [Show full text]
  • Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities
    PREPUBLICATION COPY – SUBJECT TO FURTHER EDITORIAL CORRECTION Technology, Policy, Law, and Ethics Regarding U.S. Acquisition and Use of Cyberattack Capabilities EMBARGOED FROM PUBLIC RELEASE UNTIL 1:00 p.m., April 29, 2009 except with express permission from the National Research Council. William A. Owens, Kenneth W. Dam, and Herbert S. Lin, editors Committee on Offensive Information Warfare Computer Science and Telecommunications Board Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS Washington, D.C. www.nap.edu THE NATIONAL ACADEMIES PRESS 500 Fifth Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20001 NOTICE: The project that is the subject of this report was approved by the Governing Board of the National Research Council, whose members are drawn from the councils of the National Academy of Sciences, the National Academy of Engineering, and the Institute of Medicine. The members of the committee responsible for the report were chosen for their special competences and with regard for appropriate balance. Support for this project was provided by the Macarthur Foundation under award number 04- 80965-000-GSS, the Microsoft Corporation under an unnumbered award, and the NRC Presidents’ Committee under an unnumbered award. Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this publication are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organizations that provided support for the project. International Standard Book Number-13: 978-0-309-XXXXX-X International Standard Book Number-10: 0-309-XXXXX-X Additional copies of this report are available from: The National Academies Press 500 Fifth Street, N.W., Lockbox 285 Washington, DC 20055 (800) 624-6242 (202) 334-3313 (in the Washington metropolitan area) Internet: http://www.nap.edu Copyright 2009 by the National Academy of Sciences.
    [Show full text]
  • Development of Internet Protocol Traceback Scheme for Detection of Denial-Of-Service Attack
    170 NIGERIAN JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENT, VOL. 16, NO. 4, DECEMBER 2019 Development of Internet Protocol Traceback Scheme for Detection of Denial-of-Service Attack O. W. Salami1*, I. J. Umoh2, E. A. Adedokun2 1 CAAS-DAC, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. 2Department of Computer Engineering, Ahmadu Bello University, Zaria, Nigeria. ABSTRACT: ABSTRACT: To mitigate the challenges that Flash Event (FE) poses to IP-Traceback techniques, this paper presents an IP Traceback scheme for detecting the source of a DoS attack based on Shark Smell Optimization Algorithm (SSOA). The developed model uses a discrimination policy with the hop-by-hop search. Random network topologies were generated using the WaxMan model in NS2 for different simulations of DoS attacks. Discrimination policies used by SSOA-DoSTBK for the attack source detection in each case were set up based on the properties of the detected attack packets. SSOA-DoSTBK was compared with a number of IP Traceback schemes for DoS attack source detection in terms of their ability to discriminate FE traffics from attack traffics and the detection of the source of Spoofed IP attack packets. SSOA-DoSTBK IP traceback scheme outperformed ACS-IPTBK that it was benchmarked with by 31.8%, 32.06%, and 28.45% lower FER for DoS only, DoS with FE, and spoofed DoS with FE tests respectively, and 4.76%, 11.6%, and 5.2% higher performance in attack path detection for DoS only, DoS with FE, and Spoofed DoS with FE tests, respectively. However, ACS-IPTBK was faster than SSOA-DoSTBK by 0.4%, 0.78%, and 1.2% for DoS only, DoS with FE, and spoofed DoS with FE tests, respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Malicious Bots : an Inside Look Into the Cyber‑Criminal Underground of the Internet / Ken Dunham and Jim Melnick
    An Inside Look into the Cyber-Criminal Underground of the Internet KEN DUNHAM JIM MELNICK Boca Raton London New York CRC Press is an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group, an informa business AN AUERBACH BOOK Auerbach Publications Taylor & Francis Group 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300 Boca Raton, FL 33487-2742 © 2009 by Taylor & Francis Group, LLC Auerbach is an imprint of Taylor & Francis Group, an Informa business No claim to original U.S. Government works Printed in the United States of America on acid-free paper 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 International Standard Book Number-13: 978-1-4200-6903-7 (Hardcover) This book contains information obtained from authentic and highly regarded sources. Reasonable efforts have been made to publish reliable data and information, but the author and publisher can- not assume responsibility for the validity of all materials or the consequences of their use. The authors and publishers have attempted to trace the copyright holders of all material reproduced in this publication and apologize to copyright holders if permission to publish in this form has not been obtained. If any copyright material has not been acknowledged please write and let us know so we may rectify in any future reprint. Except as permitted under U.S. Copyright Law, no part of this book may be reprinted, reproduced, transmitted, or utilized in any form by any electronic, mechanical, or other means, now known or hereafter invented, including photocopying, microfilming, and recording, or in any information storage or retrieval system, without written permission from the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 RVTEC Annual Meeting Network Security
    David Dittrich University of Washington UNOLS RVTEC Meeting, November 19, 2009 1. Reconnaissance (gather information about the target system or network) 2. Probe and attack (probe the system for weaknesses and deploy the tools) 3. Toehold (exploit security weakness and gain entry into the system) 4. Advanc ement (advance from an unprivileged account to a privileged account) 5. Stealth (hide tracks; install a backdoor) 6. Listening post (establish a listening post) 7. Takeover (expand control from a single host to other hosts on network) “Catapults and grappling hooks: The tools and techniques of information warfare,” IBM Systems Journal, Vol. 37, No. 1, 1998 http://www.research.ibm.com/journal/sj/371/boulanger.html Data Theft and Espionage (Industrial and National Security) Fraud Disruption of Operations Extortion Targeted “spam” with trojan horse, “lost” USB thumb drives in parking lots, etc. • Executable attachments • Media files, documents, embedded content • Key loggers or “root kits” installed • Data exfiltrated by POST or reverse tunnel through firewall Surplused equipment! http://www.computer.org/portal/cms_docs_security/security/v1n1/garfinkel.pdf Unauthorized access to steal data, media Phishing (social engineering via email) Key logging, or screen capture (attack virtual keyboards) HTTP POST interception Social engineering and exploiting trust Bypassing technical defenses Eluding capture through concealment Avoiding detection for long periods of time 1. Exploitation of remotely accessible vulnerabilities in the Windows LSASS (139/tcp) and RPC-DCOM Technical Exploits (445/t cp) services 2. Email to targets obtained from WAB except those containing specific substrings (e.g., “icrosof”, “ecur” , “.mil”, etc.) 3. Messaging AIM and MSN buddy list members with randomly formed sentence and URL 4.
    [Show full text]