DOCSLIB.ORG

Refco, Inc. Securities Litigation 05-CV-8626-First Amended

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Refco, Inc. Securities Litigation 05-CV-8626-First Amended UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK _____________________________________ : MASTER FILE NO. : 05 Civ. 8626 (GEL) In re REFCO, INC. SECURITIES : LITIGATION : JURY TRIAL DEMANDED : ____________________________________ : FIRST AMENDED CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT BERNSTEIN LITOWITZ BERGER GRANT & EISENHOFER P.A. & GROSSMANN LLP Stuart M. Grant (SG-8157) Max W. Berger (MB-5010) James J. Sabella (JS-5454) John P. Coffey (JC-3832) 45 Rockefeller Center, 15th Floor John C. Browne (JB-0391) New York, NY 10111 Noam N. Mandel (NM-0203) Telephone: (646) 722-8500 Jeremy P. Robinson Facsimile: (646) 722-8501 1285 Avenue of the Americas - and - New York, NY 10019 Telephone: (212) 554-1400 Megan D. McIntyre Facsimile: (212) 554-1444 Jeff A. Almeida Christine M. Mackintosh Jill Agro Chase Manhattan Centre 1201 North Market Street Wilmington, DE 19801 Telephone: (302) 622-7000 Facsimile: (302) 622-7100 Attorneys for Lead Plaintiffs RH Capital Associates LLC and Pacific Investment Management Company LLC and Co-Lead Counsel for the Putative Class TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. NATURE OF THE ACTION ...............................................................................1 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ...........................................................................6 III. PARTIES AND RELEVANT NON-PARTIES ...................................................8 A. Plaintiffs ....................................................................................................8 B. The Company .........................................................................................10 C. The Defendants .......................................................................................12 1. The Bennett Shell-Entity Defendants .........................................12 2. The Refco-Affiliated Defendants................................................13 3. The Officer Defendants...............................................................13 4. Defendant Trosten.......................................................................17 5. Defendant Grant ..........................................................................18 6. The Audit Committee Defendants ..............................................18 7. The Defendants Affiliated with Thomas H. Lee Partners...........20 8. Grant Thornton............................................................................23 9. The Underwriter Defendants.......................................................23 10. Defendant BAWAG....................................................................31 IV. CLASS ALLEGATIONS ...................................................................................33 V. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS PERTINENT TO CLAIMS FOR RELIEF UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT .....................................................................36 A. Historical Background Regarding the Company....................................36 B. The THL Partner Defendants’ Investment and the 2004 Recapitalization.......................................................................................38 i C. The Bond Offering..................................................................................41 1. The Offering Memorandum........................................................43 (a) The Financial Statements in the Offering Memorandum Contained Untrue Statements of Material Facts .............................................................44 (b) The Description of Customer Receivables and Related-Party Transactions in the Offering Memorandum Contained Untrue Statements and Omissions of Material Fact.............................................52 (c) The Offering Memorandum Misrepresented the Reasons for the Company’s Purported Success..............54 (d) The Offering Memorandum Misrepresented the Company’s Ability to Access the Cash It Needed to Service Its Debt...........................................................55 (e) The Offering Memorandum Misrepresented That the Company Had Taken Adequate Steps to Protect Itself From the Risk of Customer Defaults .....................57 (f) The Offering Memorandum Misrepresented That the Company Maintained Excess Regulatory Capital ....59 (g) The Offering Memorandum Failed to Disclose BAWAG’s Full Ownership Interest in Refco Group......60 2. The Bond Road Show.................................................................61 3. The Bond Registration Statement ...............................................62 D. The August 2005 Initial Public Offering ................................................68 1. The IPO Registration Statement .................................................69 (a) The Financial Statements in the IPO Registration Statement Contained Untrue Statements of Material Facts ................................................................................70 (b) Description of Customer Receivables and Related- Party Transactions in the IPO Registration Statement Contained Untrue Statements and Omissions of Material Fact...................................................................79 ii (c) The IPO Registration Statement Misrepresented That the Company Had Taken Adequate Steps to Protect Itself From the Risk of Customer Defaults.........81 (d) The IPO Registration Statement Misrepresented That The Company Maintained Excess Regulatory Capital.............................................................................82 (e) The IPO Registration Statement Failed to Disclose BAWAG’s Full Ownership Interest in Refco Group......84 E. The Truth Begins to Emerge and the Company Collapses .....................84 VI. THE COMPANY’S VIOLATIONS OF GAAP .................................................89 VII. GRANT THORNTON’S VIOLATIONS OF AUDITING STANDARDS .......94 A. Violations of General Standards .............................................................95 B. Violations of Standards of Fieldwork .....................................................96 C. Violations of Reporting Standards........................................................101 D. Violations of CFTC Rules and Regulations..........................................102 VIII. DEFENDANTS’ NEGLIGENCE.....................................................................103 A. The Offering Memorandum and the Bond Registration Statement ......103 B. The IPO Registration Statement ...........................................................105 IX. ALLEGATIONS PERTAINING TO CONTROL PERSON LIABILITY ......107 A. The Officer Defendants.........................................................................107 B. Refco Holdings and the Bennett Trust..................................................110 C. Robert C. Trosten..................................................................................112 D. The THL Partner Defendants................................................................113 E. The THL Individual Defendants...........................................................115 F. The Audit Committee Defendants ........................................................117 G. BAWAG .......................................................................................119 iii X. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT............................122 COUNT ONE....................................................................................................122 COUNT TWO...................................................................................................125 COUNT THREE...............................................................................................130 COUNT FOUR .................................................................................................133 COUNT FIVE...................................................................................................137 COUNT SIX .....................................................................................................139 COUNT SEVEN ...............................................................................................144 COUNT EIGHT................................................................................................146 XI. DEFENDANTS’ FRAUDULENT SCHEME..................................................148 A. Origins of the Scheme...........................................................................149 B. Bennett Becomes CEO and, With the Aid of Maggio and Others, Transfers Uncollectible Receivables Off Refco’s Books .....................153 C. Refco Engages In a Series of Fraudulent “Round About” Transactions to Conceal the Receivable At Each Financial Period End ....................154 1. The Financial Statements Closest in Time to The Bond Offering and IPO Were Materially Misstated by Virtue of Transactions with BAWAG and Customer X...........................155 i. The February 2002 Transaction....................................158 ii. The February 2003 Transaction....................................161 iii. The February 2004 Transaction....................................162 iv. The May 2004 Transaction...........................................164 v. The August 2004 Transaction.......................................165 vi. The November 2004 Transaction..................................167 vii. The December 2004 Transaction..................................168 iv viii. The February 2005 Transaction....................................169 ix. The May 2005 Transaction...........................................170 x. The August 2005 Transaction.......................................171 2. The Fraudulent Transactions with
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Collapse of MF Global: Summary & Analysis
    The Collapse of MF Global: Summary & Analysis By: Cause of Action Introduction Less than two years after Jon Corzine became CEO of MF Global Holdings, Ltd., the international commodities broker filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under Chapter 11 on October 31, 2011 – fittingly enough on Halloween, the most frightening day of the year, as MF Global’s brokerage customers would soon discover. The company’s failure has since been blamed on a risky trading strategy that Corzine introduced to increase revenues in the face of MF Global’s declining core business. Corzine effectively engineered a more than $6 billion bet on the sovereign debt of Ireland, Italy, Spain, Portugal and Belgium through the use of a financial transaction commonly referred to as a “Repo to Maturity” (RTM). Although Corzine was prescient in betting that European sovereign debt would not default, margin calls by MF Global’s counterparties ultimately overwhelmed the company and triggered a classic liquidity crisis. By the time the tailspin had reached its natural conclusion, $1.6 billion of customer funds were missing due to sloppy bookkeeping and mismanagement. As a financial services holding company, MF Global Holdings has a number of subsidiaries throughout the world. MF Global, Inc. (MFGI) was the company’s U.S.-based futures commission merchant (FCM) and registered broker-dealer, subject to regulation by both the CFTC and SEC. MFGI was also a designated primary dealer in U.S. Treasury securities. MF Global’s UK-based subsidiary (MFGUK) was instrumental in the vast majority of the trades the firm embarked. A traditional bankruptcy trustee has been appointed to oversee the liquidation of MF Global Holdings, the parent company, while the Securities Investor Protection Corporation has appointed its own trustee to liquidate MFGI, the FCM/broker-dealer.
    [Show full text]
  • The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Exact Name of Registrant As Specified in Its Charter) Delaware 13-4019460 (State Or Other Jurisdiction of (I.R.S
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 Commission File Number: 001-14965 The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-4019460 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 85 Broad Street 10004 New York, N.Y. (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) (212) 902-1000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class: Name of each exchange on which registered: Common stock, par value $.01 per share, and attached Shareholder New York Stock Exchange Protection Rights Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange 6.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D 5.793% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Normal Automatic Preferred Enhanced New York Stock Exchange Capital Securities of Goldman Sachs Capital
    [Show full text]
  • MF Global Collapse FIA International Futures Industry Conference Things Happen March 13-16, 2012 at Boca Boca Raton Resort & Club
    New Era for Wheat Futures | Kospi Explosion on Eurex | Dodd-Frank Update JANUARY 2012 | V22.N1 Washington Examines MF Global Collapse FIA International Futures Industry Conference Things Happen March 13-16, 2012 at Boca Boca Raton Resort & Club 1976 The first FIA International Futures Industry Conference is held in 1978 The first Commodity Futures Trading Commission Chairman Innisbrook. The conference moves to the Boca Raton Hotel and Club in 1979 William T. Bagley delivers his first major address to the futures industry. where it remains for the next 32 years with the exception of one year in Miami (1980) when the hotel is under renovation. 1985 Robert Rubin, Goldman Sachs, predicts that the futures industry could suffer “if stock index futures trading at some point really upends trading on the New York Stock Exchange … it will resurrect the 1983 John Damgard’s first Boca as president latent view of futures activity as socially useless speculation and that of the Futures Industry Association. will cause us a lot of trouble in the regulatory arena.” 1989 Chicago Board of Trade unveils “Aurora”, an electronic trading system that 1993 CME Chairman Jack Sandner puts forth a plan to tries to simulate the pit on a trading screen; create a financial super agency to replace the Commodity traders will use a pointing device known as Futures Trading Commission and the Securities and a “mouse”. Exchange Commission. 1995 Two weeks after the demise of Barings Bank, FIA assembles a panel 1996 International futures regulators from 14 jurisdictions sign a on the crisis and establishes FIA Global Task Force on Financial Integrity to Declaration on Cooperation and Supervision of International Futures make recommendations that would enhance the protection of the assets of Exchanges and Clearing Organizations—49 international foreign market participants.
    [Show full text]
  • 2005 Form 10-K
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended November 25, 2005 Commission File Number: 001-14965 The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-4019460 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. employer incorporation or organization) identification no.) 85 Broad Street New York, N.Y. 10004 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code) (212) 902-1000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class: Name of each exchange on which registered: Common stock, par value $.01 per share, and attached Shareholder New York Stock Exchange Protection Rights Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange 6.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C Medium-Term Notes, Series B, 0.25% Exchangeable Notes due 2007; American Stock Exchange Index-Linked Notes due 2013; Index-Linked Notes due April 2013; Index-Linked Notes due May 2013; Index-Linked Notes due July 2010; and Index-Linked Notes due 2011 Medium-Term Notes, Series B, 7.35% Notes due 2009; 7.80% Notes due New York Stock Exchange 2010; Floating Rate Notes due 2006; and Floating Rate Notes due 2008 Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Mfglobalstaffreport111512.Pdf
    STAFF REPORT PREPARED FOR REP. RANDY NEUGEBAUER, CHAIRMAN SUBCOMMITTEE ON OVERSIGHT & INVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE ON FINANCIAL SERVICES 112TH CONGRESS NOVEMBER 15, 2012 “The goal here is not to be a prop trader. … I don’t think that we will be in a risk- taking position, substantial enough to have it be the kind of thing that the rating agencies would say ‘holy cow, these guys got a different business strategy’ than what we told them we had.” -Jon Corzine, May 20, 2010 Contents Preface ............................................................................................................................................. 1 The Subcommittee’s Investigation ........................................................................................................... 3 MF Global Prior to Jon Corzine’s Arrival ...................................................................................... 5 Company Origin and Growth .................................................................................................................... 5 The Man Group Spins Off MF Global ........................................................................................................ 6 Unauthorized Trading Incident Shatters Investor Confidence ................................................................. 7 Efforts to Restore Investor Confidence Falter .......................................................................................... 9 A New Strategy Stalls .............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • In Re MF Global Holdings Limited Securities Litigation 11-CV-07866
    Case 1:11-cv-07866-VM Document 330 Filed 08/20/12 Page 1 of 238 I UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ; COURT sov SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------x Civil Action No. 1:11 -cv-07866-VM IN RE MF GLOBAL HOLDINGS LIMITED SECURITIES LITIGATION : CONSOLIDATED AMENDED SECURITIES CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT --------------------- x JURY TRIAL DEMANDED THIS DOCUMENT RELATES TO: : ECF CASE All Securities Actions (DeAngelis v. Corzine) ---------------------x Case 1:11-cv-07866-VM Document 330 Filed 08/20/12 Page 2 of 238 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. NATURE AND SUMMARY OF THE ACTION .............................................................. 2 II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE ......................................................................................... 7 III. PARTIES ............................................................................................................................ 8 A. Plaintiffs..................................................................................................................8 B. Individual Defendants ........................................................................................... 10 1. Officer Defendants .................................................................................... 10 2. Director Defendants .................................................................................. 11 C. Underwriter Defendants ........................................................................................ 14 IV. FACTUAL BACKGROUND ..........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Recommendations for Best Practices in Order Entry and Transmission of Exchange-Traded Futures and Options Transactions
    Recommendations for Best Practices in Order Entry and Transmission of Exchange-Traded Futures and Options Transactions For Public Release: March 15, 2001 National Futures Association and Futures Industry Institute February 2, 2001 Honorable James E. Newsome Acting Chairman Commodity Futures Trading Commission 1155 21st Street, N.W. Washington, DC 20581 Dear Acting Chairman Newsome: On behalf of the National Futures Association and the Futures Industry Institute, we are pleased to forward to you the enclosed Recommendations for Best Practices in Order Entry and Trans- mission of Exchange-Traded Futures and Options Transactions (“Report”). Approximately one year ago, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“Commission”) directed us to undertake an “industry-wide study of issues associated with order transmission and entry procedures for exchange-traded futures and options and the diligent supervision of the order transmission and order entry process by commodity professionals.”1 Consistent with that charge, the recommendations contained in this Report represent the collective efforts of a wide cross-section of the exchange-traded futures and options community. An Advisory Committee of senior representatives of the deriva- tives industry provided critical guidance to the members of our study team in developing and implementing the study plan. In addition, four Expert Panels, one representing end-users and the other three comprised of individuals with expertise in operations, technology and compliance, generously shared their knowledge with us, allowing us to appreciate more fully the practical implica- tions of the various international trading modalities and regulatory structures, as well as assisting us in developing the recommenda- tions set forth in this Report.
    [Show full text]
  • Refco: Estate Complaint FINAL AS FILED
    IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS COUNTY DEPARTMENT, LAW DIVISION MARC S. KIRSCHNER, ) as Trustee of the Refco Litigation Trust, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) -vs- ) Case No. _________ ) GRANT THORNTON LLP, MAYER, ) BROWN, ROWE & MAW, LLP, ERNST & ) YOUNG U.S. LLP, ) PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS LLP, ) Jury Trial Demanded CREDIT SUISSE SECURITIES (USA) LLC ) (f/k/a CREDIT SUISSE FIRST BOSTON ) LLC), BANC OF AMERICA SECURITIES ) LLC, DEUTSCHE BANK SECURITIES ) INC., PHILLIP R. BENNETT, SANTO C. ) MAGGIO, ROBERT C. TROSTEN, TONE N. ) GRANT, REFCO GROUP HOLDINGS, ) INC., LIBERTY CORNER CAPITAL ) STRATEGIES, LLC, WILLIAM T. PIGOTT, ) EMF FINANCIAL PRODUCTS, LLC, EMF ) CORE FUND, LTD., DELTA FLYER FUND, ) LLC, ERIC M. FLANAGAN, INGRAM ) MICRO, INC., CIM VENTURES, INC., ) BECKENHAM TRADING CO. INC., ) ANDREW KRIEGER, COAST ASSET ) MANAGEMENT, LLC (f/k/a COAST ASSET ) MANAGEMENT LP), CS LAND ) MANAGEMENT, LLC, and CHRISTOPHER ) PETITT, ) ) Defendants. ) COMPLAINT This action is brought by Marc S. Kirschner (the “Trustee”), the Court-approved Trustee for the Refco Litigation Trust (the “Trust”), as the duly authorized representative to commence all claims and causes of action formerly owned by the bankruptcy estates of Refco Inc. and certain of its direct and indirect subsidiaries (collectively, “Refco” and, individually or collectively, the “Company”), including Refco Group Ltd., LLC (“RGL”) and Refco Capital Markets, Ltd. (“RCM”), against defendants Grant Thornton LLP (“GT”), Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP (“MB”), Ernst & Young U.S. LLP (“E&Y”), PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (“PwC”), Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (f/k/a Credit Suisse First Boston LLC) (“Credit Suisse”), Banc of America Securities LLC (“BAS”), Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (“Deutsche”), Phillip R. Bennett (“Bennett”), Santo C.
    [Show full text]
  • United States Bankruptcy Court Southern District of New York
    UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x : In re: : Chapter 11 : Refco Inc., et al., : Case No. 05-60006 (RDD) : Debtors. : (Jointly Administered) : - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - x DISCLOSURE STATEMENT WITH RESPECT TO AMENDED JOINT CHAPTER 11 PLAN OF REFCO INC. AND CERTAIN OF ITS DIRECT AND INDIRECT SUBSIDIARIES J. Gregory Milmoe Luc A. Despins Sally McDonald Henry Susheel Kirpalani J. Gregory St. Clair Dennis C. O'Donnell SKADDEN, ARPS, SLATE, MEAGHER MILBANK, TWEED, HADLEY & McCLOY LLP & FLOM LLP One Chase Manhattan Plaza Four Times Square New York, New York 10005 New York, New York 10036-6522 (212) 530-5000 (212) 735-3000 Attorneys for the Official Committee of Unsecured Attorneys for Refco Inc., et al. Creditors of Refco Inc., et al. David S. Rosner Andrew K. Glenn Jeffrey R. Gleit KASOWITZ, BENSON, TORRES & FRIEDMAN LLP 1633 Broadway New York, New York 10019 (212) 506-1700 Attorneys for the Additional Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Refco Inc., et al. THIS IS NOT A SOLICITATION OF ACCEPTANCE OR REJECTION OF THE PLAN. ACCEPTANCES OR REJECTIONS MAY NOT BE SOLICITED UNTIL A DISCLOSURE STATEMENT HAS BEEN APPROVED BY THE BANKRUPTCY COURT. THIS DISCLOSURE STATEMENT IS BEING SUBMITTED FOR APPROVAL BUT HAS NOT BEEN APPROVED BY THE COURT. Dated: New York, New York October 6,13, 2006 INTRODUCTION The following introduction is only a general overview, which is qualified in its entirety by, and should be read in conjunction with, the more detailed discussions, information and financial statements and notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this disclosure statement (the "Disclosure Statement") and the Amended Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Refco Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • MF Global 2009 Annual Report
    capture your market 2009 Annual Report This is a relationship business. Our focus never wavers from our clients and what they are trying to achieve. Whether it’s cash, futures or options, foreign exchange, commodities or fixed income markets, our clients trust that MF Global is working for them. Our message is simple: We capture our clients’ markets— wherever they are, whatever they trade. 1 Financial Highlights in millions, except for per share data FISCAL YEAR ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 2008 2007 Execution-only commissions $ 381.1 $ 486.2 $ 386.5 Cleared commissions 1,261.3 1,528.6 1,280.0 Principal transactions (1) 287.7 333.3 299.6 Net interest income 377.2 503.8 351.1 Net revenue (1) 1,371.7 1,687.7 1,378.7 Pre-tax income (1) $ 98.6 $ 300.9 $ 227.6 Net income (1) $ 57.8 $ 199.8 $ 147.7 Earnings (loss) per share (1) $ 0.47 $ 1.57 $ 1.16 (1) Information is presented on an adjusted basis, which is a non-GAAP measure. For a reconciliation of non-GAAP measures with the comparable GAAP measures, please see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 31, 2009. 2 Letter to Shareholders Bernard W. Dan Chief Executive Officer Dear Shareholders, Fiscal 2009 was a year of tremendous change for MF Global. As we are all aware, the broader financial landscape underwent a significant transformation. After years of operating in a climate that fostered growth, the world quickly was forced to confront new and difficult dynamics.
    [Show full text]
  • 2007 Form 10-K
    UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM 10-K ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 For the fiscal year ended November 30, 2007 Commission File Number: 001-14965 The Goldman Sachs Group, Inc. (Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) Delaware 13-4019460 (State or other jurisdiction of (I.R.S. Employer incorporation or organization) Identification No.) 85 Broad Street 10004 New York, N.Y. (Zip Code) (Address of principal executive offices) (212) 902-1000 (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code) Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: Title of each class: Name of each exchange on which registered: Common stock, par value $.01 per share, and attached Shareholder New York Stock Exchange Protection Rights Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series A Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange 6.20% Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series B Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series C Depositary Shares, Each Representing 1/1,000th Interest in a Share of New York Stock Exchange Floating Rate Non-Cumulative Preferred Stock, Series D 5.793% Fixed-to-Floating Rate Normal Automatic Preferred Enhanced New York Stock Exchange Capital Securities of Goldman Sachs Capital
    [Show full text]
  • Report of the Trustee's Investigation and Recommendations
    James B. Kobak, Jr. Christopher K. Kiplok Jeffrey R. Coleman Vilia B. Hayes Sarah L. Cave HUGHES HUBBARD & REED LLP One Battery Park Plaza New York, New York 10004 Telephone: (212) 837-6000 Facsimile: (212) 422-4726 Attorneys for James W. Giddens, Trustee for the SIPA Liquidation of MF Global Inc. UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK In re MF GLOBAL INC., Case No. 11-2790 (MG) SIPA Debtor. Report of the Trustee’s Investigation and Recommendations TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Executive Summary .............................................................................................................1 A. Introduction ..............................................................................................................1 B. Summary Of Events .................................................................................................5 II. MF Global Structure: Governance, Key Departments, And Personnel .............................15 A. Corporate Structure ................................................................................................16 B. The Boards of Directors And Senior Management................................................17 C. Treasury, Finance, Treasury Operations, Operations, And Regulatory .................19 1. Treasury and Treasury Operations .............................................................20 2. Finance and Financial Regulatory Group ..................................................21 3. Operations ..................................................................................................23
    [Show full text]