DOCSLIB.ORG

THE CHRONOLOGY of VALENS' DEALINGS with PERSIA and ARMENIA, 364–378CE Noel Lenski the Best Chronology of Rome's Dealings W

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
THE CHRONOLOGY of VALENS' DEALINGS with PERSIA and ARMENIA, 364–378CE Noel Lenski the Best Chronology of Rome's Dealings W THE CHRONOLOGY OF VALENS’ DEALINGS WITH PERSIA AND ARMENIA, 364–378CE Noel Lenski Abstract: This article reexamines the chronology of foreign affairs on Rome’s eastern frontier during the reign of Valens. Questions of strategy are avoided in favor of a systematic treatment of the order and dating of events. Ammianus provides the basis for a narrative and a number of chronological indicators in passages at 27.12, 29.1, 30.1–2,and31.7. These are fleshed out with passages from the Armenian Epic Histories, Themistius, and the ecclesiastical historians. When brought into synergy with the chronological indicators of the Theodosian Code, this informa- tion is made to yield a datable order of events involving Persia, Armenia, Iberia, and the Saracens between 364 and 378. The best chronology of Rome’s dealings with Persia, Armenia and Iberia during the reign of Valens was established by Otto Seeck in 1906.1 Seeck based his conclusions on two series of winters listed in Ammianus’ narrative, the only narrative for the period to give us sound chronological indicators. Seeck combined his results from Ammianus with his chronological analysis of the Codex Theodosianus to fashion a largely convincing narrative for east Roman foreign policy during Valens’ reign in his Geschichte des Untergangs der antiken Welt.2 Most schol- 1 Otto Seeck, ‘Zur Chronologie und Quellenkritik des Ammianus’, Hermes 41 (1906) 481–539,at520–521, 523, 525. Important chronological observations were made already at J. Marquart, ‘Untersuchungen zur Geschichte von Eran’, Philologus 55 (1896) 213– 244,at219–227. Marquart himself drew extensively on the work of Henry F. Clinton, Fasti Romani (Oxford 1845) 460–492. The present article recreates the basis for the chronology used in chapter 4 of my Failure of Empire: Valens and the Roman State in the Fourth Century AD (Berkeley/Los Angeles/London 2002), which does not deal with questions of chronology in detail. It is drawn from appendix 2 of my 1995 Princeton dissertation, which it heavily revises and expands. The two Armenian sources used throughout, the Buzandaran Patmut’iwnk’ (Epic Histories, hereinafter BP), and the histories of Moses Khorenats’i (hereinafter MX) are quoted in the translations of Nina Garsoïan (tr. and comm.), The Epic Histories attributed to P’awstos Buzand (Buzandaran Patmut’iwnk’) (Cambridge, Mass. 1989) and Robert W. Thomson (tr. and comm.), Moses Khorenats’i History of the Armenians (Cambridge, Mass. 1978). 2 Otto Seeck, Geschichte des Untergangs der antiken Welt,vol.5 (4th ed.; Stuttgart 1921) 58–69 with 448–453.Ondifficulties of chronology in Ammianus more generally and on Ammianus’ tendency to date military campaigns by sequences of winters, very much in 96 noel lenski ars have since followed Seeck’s chronology which is without question the fundamental work on the problem,3 but many have not, especially because everyone since Seeck has treated chronology as secondary to larger arguments about foreign policy. The result is that a number of schemes have appeared, most of them less reliable than Seeck’s, though some contain important insights.4 Moreover, as we shall see, Seeck did not give full weight to sources other than Ammianus and the Codex. Thus, his scheme contains some important errors and remains unnec- essarily vague on a number of issues. Because the chronology has not the Greek historiographic tradition, see Timothy D. Barnes, Ammianus Marcellinus and the Representation of Historical Reality (Ithaca/London 1998) 43–53, 181–182. 3 Seeck is followed by G. Köhler, Untersuchungen zur Geschichte des Kaisers Valens (Diss. Jena 1925) 70–94; A. Solari, ‘Il non intervento nel conflitto tra la Persia e Valente’, RFIC 60 (1932) 352–358; Ernst Stein, J.R. Palanque, Histoire du bas-empire.vol.1: De l’état romain à l’état byzantin (284–476) (Paris 1959) 186–187 with 205–206; Wolfgang Seyfarth, Ammianus Marcellinus. Römische Geschichte,Teil4 (Berlin 1971) 322–324, 336–337, 348–350; André Piganiol, L’empire chrétien, 325–395 (rev. ed.; Paris 1972) 175–177; Roger C. Blockley, Ammianus Marcellinus. A Study of his Historiography and Political Thought (Brussels 1975) 62– 72; Alexander Demandt, Die Spätantike. Römische Geschichte von Diocletian bis Justinian, 284– 565 n. Chr., HdAW III.6 (Munich 1989) 119. Cf. Marie-Anne Marié, Ammien Marcellin. Histoire, Tome V, Livres XXVI–XXVIII (Paris 1984) 270–273. 4 Norman H. Baynes, ‘Rome and Armenia in the Fourth Century’, English Historical Review 25 (1910) 625–643, repr. in: Idem, Byzantine Studies and Other Essays (London 1955) 186–208,at636–642 establishes his own chronology based on the much less reliable narrative of BP. P. Pascal Asdourian, Die politischen Beziehungen zwischen Armenien und Rom von 190 v. Chr. bis 428 n. Chr.(Venice1911) 155–162 offers a chronology which comes closest to the one presented here, though he offers no explanations for the dates he assigns. A. Nagl, ‘Valens 3’, RE 2.7.2 (1948) 2097–2137,at2113–2117 combines elements from Seeck and Baynes. René Grousset, Histoire de l’Arménie des origines à 1071 (Paris 1973) 140–156 works with an extremely impressionistic chronology, also with no explanations for dates. R.H. Hewsen, ‘The Successors of Tiridates the Great: A Contribution to the History of Armenia in the Fourth Century’, Revue des Études Arméniennes n.s. 13 (1978–1979) 99–126 generates a chronology for the Armenian royal line that is directly relevant, basing his findings primarily on Moses Khorenats’i. Roger C. Blockley, ‘The Division of Armenia between the Romans and the Persians at the End of the Fourth Century AD’, Historia 36 (1987) 222–234,at225–229,andIdem,East Roman Foreign Policy. Formation and Conduct from Diocletian to Anastasius (Leeds 1992) 30–39 generally follows Seeck for the early years but establishes his own chronology using some input from Baynes, ‘Rome and Armenia’, for the last years of the reign. Bernhard Gutmann, Studien zur römischen Aussenpolitik in der Spätantike (364–395 n. Chr.) (Bonn 1991) 170–183 uses Seeck as a basis but relies heavily on Blockley, ‘The Division of Armenia’, and East Roman Foreign Policy for his chronology. Geoffrey Greatrex, ‘The Background and Aftermath of the Partition of Armenia in A.D. 387’, AHB 14 (2000) 35–48,andin turn Geoffrey Greatrex, Samuel N.C. Lieu, The Roman Eastern Frontier and the Persian Wars,PartIIAD363–630, A Narrative Sourcebook (London 2002) 21–28 offer a chronology that combines elements from Baynes, ‘Rome and Armenia’, Blockley, ‘The Division of Armenia’ and Idem, East Roman Foreign Policy..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian's “Great
    ABSTRACT RICE, CARL ROSS. Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy. (Under the direction of Prof. S. Thomas Parker) In the year 303, the Roman Emperor Diocletian and the other members of the Tetrarchy launched a series of persecutions against Christians that is remembered as the most severe, widespread, and systematic persecution in the Church’s history. Around that time, the Tetrarchy also issued a rescript to the Pronconsul of Africa ordering similar persecutory actions against a religious group known as the Manichaeans. At first glance, the Tetrarchy’s actions appear to be the result of tensions between traditional classical paganism and religious groups that were not part of that system. However, when the status of Jewish populations in the Empire is examined, it becomes apparent that the Tetrarchy only persecuted Christians and Manichaeans. This thesis explores the relationship between the Tetrarchy and each of these three minority groups as it attempts to understand the Tetrarchy’s policies towards minority religions. In doing so, this thesis will discuss the relationship between the Roman state and minority religious groups in the era just before the Empire’s formal conversion to Christianity. It is only around certain moments in the various religions’ relationships with the state that the Tetrarchs order violence. Consequently, I argue that violence towards minority religions was a means by which the Roman state policed boundaries around its conceptions of Roman identity. © Copyright 2016 Carl Ross Rice All Rights Reserved Diocletian’s “Great Persecutions”: Minority Religions and the Roman Tetrarchy by Carl Ross Rice A thesis submitted to the Graduate Faculty of North Carolina State University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts History Raleigh, North Carolina 2016 APPROVED BY: ______________________________ _______________________________ S.
    [Show full text]
  • Hadrian and the Greek East
    HADRIAN AND THE GREEK EAST: IMPERIAL POLICY AND COMMUNICATION DISSERTATION Presented in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Doctor of Philosophy in the Graduate School of the Ohio State University By Demetrios Kritsotakis, B.A, M.A. * * * * * The Ohio State University 2008 Dissertation Committee: Approved by Professor Fritz Graf, Adviser Professor Tom Hawkins ____________________________ Professor Anthony Kaldellis Adviser Greek and Latin Graduate Program Copyright by Demetrios Kritsotakis 2008 ABSTRACT The Roman Emperor Hadrian pursued a policy of unification of the vast Empire. After his accession, he abandoned the expansionist policy of his predecessor Trajan and focused on securing the frontiers of the empire and on maintaining its stability. Of the utmost importance was the further integration and participation in his program of the peoples of the Greek East, especially of the Greek mainland and Asia Minor. Hadrian now invited them to become active members of the empire. By his lengthy travels and benefactions to the people of the region and by the creation of the Panhellenion, Hadrian attempted to create a second center of the Empire. Rome, in the West, was the first center; now a second one, in the East, would draw together the Greek people on both sides of the Aegean Sea. Thus he could accelerate the unification of the empire by focusing on its two most important elements, Romans and Greeks. Hadrian channeled his intentions in a number of ways, including the use of specific iconographical types on the coinage of his reign and religious language and themes in his interactions with the Greeks. In both cases it becomes evident that the Greeks not only understood his messages, but they also reacted in a positive way.
    [Show full text]
  • Byzantium's Balkan Frontier
    This page intentionally left blank Byzantium’s Balkan Frontier is the first narrative history in English of the northern Balkans in the tenth to twelfth centuries. Where pre- vious histories have been concerned principally with the medieval history of distinct and autonomous Balkan nations, this study regards Byzantine political authority as a unifying factor in the various lands which formed the empire’s frontier in the north and west. It takes as its central concern Byzantine relations with all Slavic and non-Slavic peoples – including the Serbs, Croats, Bulgarians and Hungarians – in and beyond the Balkan Peninsula, and explores in detail imperial responses, first to the migrations of nomadic peoples, and subsequently to the expansion of Latin Christendom. It also examines the changing conception of the frontier in Byzantine thought and literature through the middle Byzantine period. is British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow, Keble College, Oxford BYZANTIUM’S BALKAN FRONTIER A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, – PAUL STEPHENSON British Academy Postdoctoral Fellow Keble College, Oxford The Pitt Building, Trumpington Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom The Edinburgh Building, Cambridge CB2 2RU, UK 40 West 20th Street, New York, NY 10011-4211, USA 477 Williamstown Road, Port Melbourne, VIC 3207, Australia Ruiz de Alarcón 13, 28014 Madrid, Spain Dock House, The Waterfront, Cape Town 8001, South Africa http://www.cambridge.org © Paul Stephenson 2004 First published in printed format 2000 ISBN 0-511-03402-4 eBook (Adobe Reader) ISBN 0-521-77017-3 hardback Contents List ofmaps and figurespagevi Prefacevii A note on citation and transliterationix List ofabbreviationsxi Introduction .Bulgaria and beyond:the Northern Balkans (c.–) .The Byzantine occupation ofBulgaria (–) .Northern nomads (–) .Southern Slavs (–) .The rise ofthe west,I:Normans and Crusaders (–) .
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient Rome and Early Christianity, 500 B.C.-A.D
    CHAPTER 6 • OBJECTIVE Ancient Rome and Early Trace the rise and fall of the Roman Empire, and analyze its impact on Christianity, 500 B.C.-A.D. 500 culture, government, and religion. Previewing Main Ideas Previewing Main Ideas Urge students to look for connections POWER AND AUTHORITY Rome began as a republic, a government in which elected officials represent the people. Eventually, absolute rulers between the three main ideas. For exam- called emperors seized power and expanded the empire. ple, point out that Rome’s rise to an Geography About how many miles did the Roman Empire stretch empire led to the spread of Christianity. from east to west? Emphasize the universality of human EMPIRE BUILDING At its height, the Roman Empire touched three desires for power and authority, as well continents—Europe, Asia, and Africa. For several centuries, Rome brought as for a spiritual connection. peace and prosperity to its empire before its eventual collapse. Geography Why was the Mediterranean Sea important to the Roman Empire? Accessing Prior Knowledge RELIGIOUS AND ETHICAL SYSTEMS Out of Judea rose a monotheistic, Ask students to list any ancient Romans or single-god, religion known as Christianity. Based on the teachings of that they can name (Possible Answers: Jesus of Nazareth, it soon spread throughout Rome and beyond. Julius Caesar, Mark Antony) and discuss Geography What geographic features might have helped or hindered the what they already know about them. spread of Christianity throughout the Roman Empire? Invite students to share their knowledge of early Christianity and Judaism. Tell them that Christianity comes from the INTERNET RESOURCES Greek word christos, meaning “messiah” • Interactive Maps Go to classzone.com for: or “savior.” • Interactive Visuals • Research Links • Maps • Interactive Primary Sources • Internet Activities • Test Practice Geography Answers • Primary Sources • Current Events • Chapter Quiz POWER AND AUTHORITY The Roman Empire stretched about 3,500 miles from east to west.
    [Show full text]
  • The Political and Military Aspects of Accession of Constantine the Great
    Graeco-Latina Brunensia 24 / 2019 / 2 https://doi.org/10.5817/GLB2019-2-2 The Political and Military Aspects of Accession of Constantine the Great Stanislav Doležal (University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice) Abstract The article argues that Constantine the Great, until he was recognized by Galerius, the senior ČLÁNKY / ARTICLES Emperor of the Tetrarchy, was an usurper with no right to the imperial power, nothwithstand- ing his claim that his father, the Emperor Constantius I, conferred upon him the imperial title before he died. Tetrarchic principles, envisaged by Diocletian, were specifically put in place to supersede and override blood kinship. Constantine’s accession to power started as a military coup in which a military unit composed of barbarian soldiers seems to have played an impor- tant role. Keywords Constantine the Great; Roman emperor; usurpation; tetrarchy 19 Stanislav Doležal The Political and Military Aspects of Accession of Constantine the Great On 25 July 306 at York, the Roman Emperor Constantius I died peacefully in his bed. On the same day, a new Emperor was made – his eldest son Constantine who had been present at his father’s deathbed. What exactly happened on that day? Britain, a remote province (actually several provinces)1 on the edge of the Roman Empire, had a tendency to defect from the central government. It produced several usurpers in the past.2 Was Constantine one of them? What gave him the right to be an Emperor in the first place? It can be argued that the political system that was still valid in 306, today known as the Tetrarchy, made any such seizure of power illegal.
    [Show full text]
  • The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) P.289
    HEATHER, PETER, The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion , Greek, Roman and Byzantine Studies, 27:3 (1986:Autumn) p.289 The Crossing of the Danube and the Gothic Conversion Peter Heather MMIANUS MARCELLINUS provides a detailed account of the re­ A lations between the Emperor Valens and the Goths during the period 367-378. But essentially because Ammianus does not mention it, there has been much controversy over the date of a Gothic conversion to Christianity ascribed in other sources to the reign of Valens. Equally, because the historians Socrates and So­ zomen link a civil war among the Goths to the conversion, it has also been unclear when this split might have taken place. It will be argued here that the primary accounts found in Socrates, Sozomen, and Eunapius can be reconciled with the secondary ones of Jordanes, Theodoret, and Orosius to suggest a Gothic conversion in 376. Fur­ ther, combined with Ammianus, they strongly indicate that Christian­ ity initially affected only elements of one Gothic group, the Tervingi, and was part of the agreement by which Valens allowed them to cross the Danube and enter the Empire in 376. It also becomes clear that the split too affected only the Tervingi, and occurred immediately before the crossing and conversion. This reconstruction in turn highlights the Huns' role in overturning the established order in Gothic society: their attacks first divided the Tervingi, who were unable to agree on an appropriate response, and prompted the larger group to seek asylum in the Empire and accept conversion to Christianity.
    [Show full text]
  • Calendar of Roman Events
    Introduction Steve Worboys and I began this calendar in 1980 or 1981 when we discovered that the exact dates of many events survive from Roman antiquity, the most famous being the ides of March murder of Caesar. Flipping through a few books on Roman history revealed a handful of dates, and we believed that to fill every day of the year would certainly be impossible. From 1981 until 1989 I kept the calendar, adding dates as I ran across them. In 1989 I typed the list into the computer and we began again to plunder books and journals for dates, this time recording sources. Since then I have worked and reworked the Calendar, revising old entries and adding many, many more. The Roman Calendar The calendar was reformed twice, once by Caesar in 46 BC and later by Augustus in 8 BC. Each of these reforms is described in A. K. Michels’ book The Calendar of the Roman Republic. In an ordinary pre-Julian year, the number of days in each month was as follows: 29 January 31 May 29 September 28 February 29 June 31 October 31 March 31 Quintilis (July) 29 November 29 April 29 Sextilis (August) 29 December. The Romans did not number the days of the months consecutively. They reckoned backwards from three fixed points: The kalends, the nones, and the ides. The kalends is the first day of the month. For months with 31 days the nones fall on the 7th and the ides the 15th. For other months the nones fall on the 5th and the ides on the 13th.
    [Show full text]
  • The Extension of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian and the Tetrarchy, 285-305Ce
    University of Central Florida STARS Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 2012 The Extension Of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian And The Tetrarchy, 285-305ce Joshua Petitt University of Central Florida Part of the History Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Masters Thesis (Open Access) is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. STARS Citation Petitt, Joshua, "The Extension Of Imperial Authority Under Diocletian And The Tetrarchy, 285-305ce" (2012). Electronic Theses and Dissertations, 2004-2019. 2412. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/etd/2412 THE EXTENSION OF IMPERIAL AUTHORITY UNDER DIOCLETIAN AND THE TETRARCHY, 285-305CE. by JOSHUA EDWARD PETITT B.A. History, University of Central Florida 2009 A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Arts in the Department of History in the College of Arts and Humanities at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Fall Term 2012 © 2012 Joshua Petitt ii ABSTRACT Despite a vast amount of research on Late Antiquity, little attention has been paid to certain figures that prove to be influential during this time. The focus of historians on Constantine I, the first Roman Emperor to allegedly convert to Christianity, has often come at the cost of ignoring Constantine's predecessor, Diocletian, sometimes known as the "Second Father of the Roman Empire". The success of Constantine's empire has often been attributed to the work and reforms of Diocletian, but there have been very few studies of the man beyond simple biography.
    [Show full text]
  • 21H.132S17 the Ancient World: Rome
    Crisis and Recovery Image by Bibi Saint- Pol. This image is in the public domain. Image by O.Mustafin. This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons. Source: Wikimedia Commons. From the Severan Dynasty to the Later Roman Empire 1 Septimius Severus AD 193 - 211 Image by Bibi Saint- Pol. This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons. 2 Le Glay, Marcel, Jean-Louis Voisin, Yann Le Bohec, et al. A History of Rome. 3rd edition. Wiley- Blackwell, 2005. © Wiley-Blackwell. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see https://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/. 3 Caracalla 198-209 w/ Severus 209-211 w/ Severus & Geta 211-217 alone Image by Marie -Lan Nguyen. Source: Wikimedia Commons. License CC BY. 4 Macrinus, 217-218 Image by Classical Numismatic Group, Inc. This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons. 5 Julia Maesa This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons. 6 Le Glay, Marcel, Jean-Louis Voisin, Yann Le Bohec, et al. A History of Rome. 3rd edition. Wiley- Blackwell, 2005. © Wiley-Blackwell. All rights reserved. This content is excluded from our Creative Commons license. For more information, see https://ocw.mit.edu/help/faq-fair-use/. 7 Elagabalus, AD 218-222 Image courtesy of Mary Harrsch on flickr. License CC BY -NC- SA. 8 Severus Alexander, AD 222-235 Image by Jastrow. This image is in the public domain. Source: Wikimedia Commons. 9 Aurelius Victor, Lives of the Emperors 24 The emperors after [Severus Alexander], more concerned with tyrannizing their subjects than subduing foreign peoples, and with warring among themselves, precipitated the Roman state into a steep decline.
    [Show full text]
  • GALERIUS, GAMZIGRAD and the POLITICS of ABDICATION Bill Leadbetter Edith Cowan University
    GALERIUS, GAMZIGRAD AND THE POLITICS OF ABDICATION Bill Leadbetter Edith Cowan University /DFWDQWLXV· pamphlet, the de mortibus persecutorum, is a curious survival. In one sense , its subject matter is given lustre by the reputation of the author. Lactantius was a legal scholar and Christian thinker of sufficient prominence, in the early fourth century, to be appointed tutRUWR&RQVWDQWLQH·VHOGHVWVRQ+H was also a polemicist of some wit and great Figure 1: Porphyry head of Galerius savagery. A rhetorican by training, his muse from Gamzigrad drew richly upon the scabrous vocabulary of villainy that seven centuries of speech-making had concocted and perfected. His portrayal of the emperor Galerius in the de mortibus has been influential, if not definitive, for generations of scholars LQWKHVDPHZD\WKDW7DFLWXV· poisonous portrait of Tiberius distorted any analysis of that odd, lonely, angry, bitter and unhappy man (eg: Barnes, 1976, 1981; also Odahl, 2004). /DFWDQLXV· Galerius is not merely bad, he is superlatively bad: the most evil man who ever lived («VHGRPQLEXVTXLfuerunt PDOLVSHLRU«9.1). A vast and corpulent man, he terrified all he encountered by his very demeanour. Despising rank (21.3) and scorning tradition (26.2), /DFWDQWLXV·*DOHULXVLVDERYHDOOIXQGDPHQWDOO\ foreign. Lactantius makes much of his origins as the child of Dacian peasant refugees who settled in the Roman side of the Danube after the Carpi had made Dacia too unpleasant for them (9.4). His Galerius, therefore, is at heart, a barbarian. He is an emperor from beyond the Empire, a monstrous primitive with a savage nature and an alien soul. Lactantius describes him at one point as an enemy of the Romanum nomen and asserts that Galerius intended to change WKHQDPHRIWKH(PSLUHIURP´5RPDQµWR´'DFLDQµ 27.8) and in general was ASCS 31 [2010] Proceedings: classics.uwa.edu.au/ascs31 an enemy of tradition and culture, preferring indeed the company of his pet bears to that of elegant aristocrats and erudite lawyers (21.5-6; 22.4) .
    [Show full text]
  • Ancient History, Rome
    4rome.qxd 4/14/04 2:33 AM Page 125 Ancient Rome Lesson 11 Rome: Republic to Empire OBJECTIVES Overview This lesson traces the history of Rome from its founding Students will be able to: myths through its kings, the republic, and the end of the republic. First, students hold a discussion on what a dictator • Explain the founding is. Then they read and discuss an article on the beginning of myths of Rome. Rome, the Roman Republic, and its transformation into an • Identify Cincinnatus, empire. Finally, in small groups, students role play members Julius Caesar, Cicero, and of a congressional committee deciding on whether the U.S. Augustus. Constitution should be amended to give the president greater • Describe the government powers in an emergency. of the Roman Republic, the checks on it, and its use of dictators. • Express a reasoned opin- STANDARDS ADDRESSED ion on whether the United States should adopt an California History–Social Science Standard 6.7: Students amendment to grant the analyze the geographic, political, economic, religious, president greater powers and social structures during the development of Rome. in an emergency. (1) Identify the location and describe the rise of the Roman Republic, including the importance of such mythi- cal and historical figures as Aeneas, Romulus and Remus, PREPARATION Cincinnatus, Julius Caesar, and Cicero. (2) Describe the government of the Roman Republic and its significance Handout 11A: Timeline of (e.g., written constitution and tripartite government, Ancient Rome—1 per student checks and balances, civic duty). Handout 11B: Map of the (4) Discuss the influence of Julius Caesar and Augustus in Roman Empire—1 per student Rome’s transition from republic to empire.
    [Show full text]
  • 4.1-Beginning of the Reign of Valentinian and Valens (364-371) Copyright 2018 Glen L
    4.1-Beginning of the Reign of Valentinian and Valens (364-371) Copyright 2018 Glen L. Thompson This document is provided for personal and educational use. It may not be used for commercial purposes without the permission of the copyright holder. Last updated: 6/6/2018 Socrates Sozomen Theodoret February 364 - Valentinian becomes Emperor 4.1.1 When the Emperor Jovian had died, as we have said, 6.6.2 When the troops arrived at Nicaea in Bithynia, 4.6.1 When the troops had learned of the emperor’s at Dadastana, in his own consulate and that of Varronian his they proclaimed Valentinian emperor. He was a good sudden death, they wept for the departed prince as if for son on the 17th of February, the army left Galatia and man and capable of holding the reins of the empire. a father and made Valentinian emperor in his place. It arrived at Nicaea in Bithynia in seven days’ march. There, was he who had struck the officer of the temple and was they unanimously proclaimed Valentinian emperor, on the sent to the castle. He was distinguished not only for his 25th of February, in the same consulate. courage, but also for prudence, temperance, justice, and 4.1.2 He was a Pannonian by race, a native of the city of great stature. Cibalis, and when he was entrusted with a military command, he displayed great skill in tactics. 4.1.3 Moreover, he had such a superior intellect, that he always seemed to exceed every degree of honor which he attained.
    [Show full text]