Copyright by Stephen Mark Caffey 2008

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Copyright by Stephen Mark Caffey 2008 Copyright by Stephen Mark Caffey 2008 The Dissertation Committee for Stephen Mark Caffey certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: An Heroics of Empire: Benjamin West and Anglophone History Painting 1764-1774 Committee: Susan Rather, Co-Supervisor Janice Leoshko, Co-Supervisor Michael Charlesworth Mia Carter Syed Akbar Hyder William Roger Louis An Heroics of Empire: Benjamin West and Anglophone History Painting 1764-1774 by Stephen Mark Caffey, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of the University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin May 2008 For Patricia Burnham Acknowledgments I wish to thank the following individuals for their generous support, without which this dissertation would have never materialized. I cannot articulate the magnitude of my appreciation of and admiration for co-supervisors Susan Rather and Janice Leoshko. They made a perfect team, gently guiding me back to the track when I derailed and offering just the right blend of criticism and encouragement. Committee members Michael Charlesworth, Akbar Hyder, Mia Carter and William Roger Louis brought a wealth of experience and expertise that helped me to broaden and deepen the scope of the project. I also benefited greatly from coursework and conversation with John Clarke, Penelope Davies, Joan Holladay, Estelle Lingo, Richard Shiff, Ann Reynolds, Linda Henderson, Cherise Smith, Steve Bourget and Persis Berlekamp. I am especially grateful to Neil Kamil, for so warmly welcoming me across campus and across disciplines; to Jeffrey Chipps Smith, whose well-timed dinner invitation in London spared me the ravages of malnutrition; and to Glenn Peers, whose sympathetic ear and calm optimism served as beacons of hope when I felt discouraged. I feel fortunate to have had Sigrid Knudsen’s help with visual resources. I am grateful to Foster Foreman for her enthusiastic interest in my topic. Among the myriad supporters from within the University of Texas, Ken Hale, Laura Schwartz, Allie De Leon, Amanda Butterfield and Maureen Howell made scholarly life much easier than it would have been without their help. Colleagues Rowena Houghton-Dasch, James v Lawrence, Katie Edwards, Lea Cline and Vanessa Paumen offered friendship and inspiration. Individuals and groups at various institutions facilitated my research. Those to whom I wish to express my sincerest gratitude include Pat Fox at the Harry Ransom Center; Sally Brooks at the Museum of London Library; Margaret Gray at Powis Castle; the students and faculty of Jadavpur University, Kolkata; Mark Pomeroy at the Royal Academy of Arts Library; Helen George at the British Library Asia Pacific and African Collections Prints and Drawings Department; Susan Stronge and Nick Barnard at the Victoria and Albert Museum; and the Viscount and Lady Windsor, Oakly Park. I also wish to extend my thanks to the Samuel H. Kress Foundation for their generous support of my work in London. For easing and enriching my time at the Courtauld Institute of Art, I wish to thank Deborah Swallow, Matthew Hunter, Sarah Monks, John Chu and Timothy Huw Davies. I am especially grateful to David Solkin, whose influence and inspiration defy quantification. Isolin Jorgensen, Simon Vaughan-Davies, Guy Cooper, Gordon Taylor, Janet Connell and Alex Connell brought many unexpected pleasures of friendship to my time in the United Kingdom. The opportunities afforded me by the Terra Foundation for American Art in funding a summer residency in Giverny gave my work a much-needed boost. I wish to thank Elizabeth Glassman and the other members of the Terra Foundation board and selection committee and Elizabeth Rossi for getting me to Giverny. Once there, I had the great honor and joy of meeting and working with a number of scholars and artists to vi whom I remain indebted in ways too numerous to express. Artists Elise Adibi, Karrie Hovey, Bertrand Derel, Veronika Tzekova and Anne and Patrick Poirier taught me so much about the heroism of making art. I am grateful to fellow historians Jessica Lee May, Jody Patterson, Rebecca Reynolds, Mathilde Arrivé and Jaime Correa for their insightful commentary and many difficult questions. Marc Simpson, Mignon Nixon and François Brunet offered invaluable guidance. For the generosity of spirit with which Barbara Zucker addressed my questions and righted my thinking, my gratitude abounds. Ewa Bobrowska-Jakubowksi’s help was invaluable, Miranda Fontaine guided and aided at every turn; I thank them both for their wonderful assistance. And for her time and attention and inspiration, I owe to Veerle Thielemans an incalculable debt of gratitude. Family and friends for whose encouragement and support I feel humbly grateful include Craig Hella Johnson, Kathleen Rice, Camille Cruz, Marie Krebs, Ian Fagerstrom, Eli Fagerstrom, Emma Lee Fagerstrom, Donna Thomas, Jacque Conn, Chris Cregeen, Russell Knotts, Mike Green, Dennis Ciscel, Adrian and Shirley Bailey, Kevin and Lynn Bailey, Michael and Andrea Bailey, Kayley Bailey, Brittany Bailey, Whitney Bailey and Mikey Bailey. Most especially, I want to thank Wayne Bailey for his unwavering patience, love and support throughout this process. vii An Heroics of Empire: Benjamin West and Anglophone History Painting 1764-1774 Publication No. Stephen Mark Caffey, Ph.D. The University of Texas at Austin, 2008 Co-Supervisors: Susan Rather and Janice Leoshko This dissertation interrogates correlations between imperial expansion and the history paintings produced for London audiences by the American-born artist Benjamin West (1738-1820) during his first decade in England (1764-1774). Within that ten-year span, Grand Manner academic history painting shaped and reflected the imperial anxieties that elite Britons experienced as a result of dramatic territorial gains, consolidations and losses in North America and South Asia. To follow the trajectory of history painting’s rise, relevance and obsolescence is to track Britons’ negotiation of their global status as a “free though conquering people.” As England’s pre-eminent history painter, West secured for himself a place within the discourses of the imperial self- imaginary by developing two types of iconographic program. First, the selective appropriation of narratives from classical antiquity allowed West and his patrons to inculcate their audiences with visual models for British imperial virtue. Advancing the viii cause of imperial self-ratification through classical narrative, West cast the English as the natural heirs to the Roman empire. The resulting images paralleled and buoyed contemporary textual discourses of empire and intersected with antiquarian collecting practices, both of which were based on the notion of modern British proprietorship of classical antiquity. Second, developing and refining a model introduced by Francis Hayman (1708-1776) at Vauxhall Pleasure Gardens in 1761, West contrived a pictorial format which introduced persons living and recently dead into a realm of visual expression formally reserved for characters from biblical and classical textual sources. Invoking some of history painting’s most familiar compositional and figural conventions, West recombined history painting, portraiture, landscape and genre to formulate the iconographically hybrid heroics of empire, complete with its own set of pictorial motifs through which West and his followers styled their subjects exemplars of classical imperial virtue. Imperial anxiety afforded history painting its short-lived relevance among English-speaking audiences during the second half of the eighteenth and first quarter of the nineteenth centuries, and imperial self-acceptance rendered that most highly-esteemed of artistic genres obsolete. Through the visual heroics of empire, Benjamin West established history painting as a viable form of Anglophone cultural production during his first decade in London. ix Table of Contents List of Illustrations xi Introduction 1 Chapter 1 – West’s First Heroics of Empire History Painting 33 Chapter 2 – Selective Appropriation: Classical and Renaissance Predicates for Modern Imperial Martial Virtue 95 Chapter 3 – Royal Patronage, Royal Academy, Modern Subjects 193 Chapter 4 – The Visual Heroics of Empire in the Private Realm 253 Conclusion 366 Illustrations 381 Appendix 445 Bibliography 465 Vita 543 x Illustrations Figure 1. Benjamin West, The Death of General Wolfe (1770) oil on canvas, 59 1/2” x 84 in” (151 x 213.5 cm). National Gallery of Canada, Ottawa. 381 Figure 2. Benjamin West, William Penn’s Treaty with the Indians (1771-1772) oil on canvas, 75 1/2” x 107 3/4” (192 x 273 cm). Pennsylvania Academy of the Fine Arts, Philadelphia. 381 Figure 3. Benjamin West, The Death of Lord Nelson (1806) oil on canvas, 70” x 96” (178 x 244 cm). Walker Art Gallery, Liverpool. 382 Figure 4. Benjamin West, Christ Healing the Sick (1811) oil on canvas, 108” x 168” (274 x 427 cm). Tate Britain, London. 382 Figure 5. Benjamin West, Lord Clive Receiving from the Mogul the Grant of the Duanney (1774) oil on canvas, c. 115” x 180” (292 x 457 cm). Earl of Plymouth, Oakly Park, Shropshire. 383 Figure 6. Benjamin West, General Johnson Saving a Wounded French Soldier from the Tomahawk of a North American Indian (1764) oil on canvas, 51” x 42” (129.5 x 106.5 cm). Derby Museum and Art Gallery, Derby. 383 Figure 7. Francis Hayman, Modello for The Surrender of Montreal to General Amherst (c. 1760) oil on canvas, 27 7/8” x 36” (70.8 x 91.4 cm). Beaverbrook Art Gallery, Fredericton, New Brunswick. 384 Figure 8. Francis Hayman, Modello for Lord Clive Receiving the Homage of the Nabob (c. 1761) oil on canvas, 40” x 50” (101.6 x 127 cm). National Portrait Gallery, London. 384 Figure 9. Apollo Belvedere, Roman copy of Greek original (late 4th century BCE) marble, 88” (223.5 cm) height. Vatican Museum, Rome. 385 Figure 10. Benjamin West, General Johnson Saving a Wounded French Officer from the Tomahawk of a North American Indian, detail. 385 Figure 11.
Recommended publications
  • Shearer West Phd Thesis Vol 1
    THE THEATRICAL PORTRAIT IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY LONDON (VOL. I) Shearer West A Thesis Submitted for the Degree of PhD at the University of St. Andrews 1986 Full metadata for this item is available in Research@StAndrews:FullText at: http://research-repository.st-andrews.ac.uk/ Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/10023/2982 This item is protected by original copyright THE THEATRICAL PORTRAIT IN EIGHTEENTH CENTURY LONDON Ph.D. Thesis St. Andrews University Shearer West VOLUME 1 TEXT In submitting this thesis to the University of St. Andrews I understand that I am giving permission for it to be made available for use in accordance with the regulations of the University Library for the time being in force, subject to any copyright vested in the work not being affected thereby. I also understand that the title and abstract will be published, and that a copy of the I work may be made and supplied to any bona fide library or research worker. ABSTRACT A theatrical portrait is an image of an actor or actors in character. This genre was widespread in eighteenth century London and was practised by a large number of painters and engravers of all levels of ability. The sources of the genre lay in a number of diverse styles of art, including the court portraits of Lely and Kneller and the fetes galantes of Watteau and Mercier. Three types of media for theatrical portraits were particularly prevalent in London, between ca745 and 1800 : painting, print and book illustration.
    [Show full text]
  • Benjamin West and His Visit to Lancaster
    BENJAMIN WEST AND HIS VISIT TO LANCASTER. By Hon. Charles I. Landis. How history is falsified by careless writers is proverbial. An illustration of this well-known fact will be seen in the recent History of Lancaster County, wherein it is stated that the first Court House built in Lancaster in Centre Square was of logs. See History of Lancaster County published in 1924 by Lewis Historical Publishing Co., Vol. 1, page 328. Of course, every one who has given the matter any attention knows that it was of brick, and if that chronicler would have read Witham Marshe's Journal—the Secretary of the Maryland Commissioners at the Indian Treaty with the Iroquois in 1744—, he would have found the Court House there described in every particular. Mr. Marshe says: "It is a pretty large brick building, two stories high." (See Egles Notes & Queries, Vol. 1, Third Series, p. 277.) Some years ago a writer in one of our newspapers said that it was of logs, and although the statement was fully refuted by Mr. F. R. Diffenderffer at the time, the historical lie still lived. I hope, however, that in the future we may have no more misrepresentation on this subject. And so I think it has been concerning Benjamin West and his early work. Many stories have been told about him, some of which are merely tradition and are not sustained by any proof; and some do not seem to have any foundation. I have thought it might be interesting to briefly present a few of them, together with certain facts as I have gathered them.
    [Show full text]
  • John Singleton Copley: Correspondence, 1766-1767
    1 JOHN SINGLETON COPLEY: CORRESPONDENCE, 1766-1767 The letters below reflect a critical phase in the career of John Singleton Copley 1738-1815), the most gifted of our native-born Colonial portraitists. In them one finds the beginning of his resolve to leave Boston for study abroad and some of the doubts that beset him before he finally sailed, never to return, in 1774. The pictures he sent to London via Captain R. G. Bruce were the famous Boy with a Squirrel, shown in 1766 at an exhibition of the Society of Artists, and a Little Girl, subsequently lost, which followed in 1767. The paintings were generally well received in London, but the criticism that they were too "liney," opaque, and lacking in "Due Subordination of the Parts," only strengthened Copley's discontent with the provincial city of his birth. Captain R. G. Bruce to Copley DEAR COPLEY, LONDON, 4TH AUGUST, 1766 Don't imagine I have forgot or neglected your Interest by my long Silence. I have delayed writing to You ever since the Exhibition, in order to forward the inclosed Letter from Mr. West, which he has from time to time promised me, but which his extreme Application to his Art has hitherto prevented his finishing. What he says will be much more conclusive to You than anything from me. I have only to add the general Opinions which were pronounced on your Picture when it was exhibited. It was universally allowed to be the best Picture of its kind that appeared on that occasion, but the sentiments of Mr.
    [Show full text]
  • 'The Little-Ingenious Garrick and the Ingenious Little Hogarth'
    Video transcript 'The little-ingenious Garrick and the ingenious little Hogarth' Robin Smith Honorary Professor of English, University College London and William Chubb Actor The Queen’s Gallery, Buckingham Palace Wednesday, 23 April 2014 ROBIN SIMON: In July 1746 the great actor David Garrick wrote a reply to an invitation from the reverend John Hoadly – [CAPTION: The Revd John Hoadly (right) detail from double portrait with Dr Maurice Greene, 1747, National Portrait Gallery] WILLIAM CHUBB: Your invitation to the Old Alresford I most cordially accept of and the little ingenious Garrick with the ingenious little Hogarth will get up on a horseblock. Mount a couple of quadrupeds, or one if it carries double and high away to the reverend Rigdom Funnydose there to be merry, facetious, mad and nonsensical. ' ROBIN SIMON: Well they were certainly facetious. The house party acted, at least to their great enjoyment, what was described as a little bawdy play by Garrick, entitled Rag-and-jaw – rag and jaw. At this stage I think I ought to make one thing clear about Georgian life and humour, it’s, well how shall we put it, very down to earth. And so if you wish you may put your hands over your ears now. Rag-and-jaw is a skit upon the relationship between Brutus and Cassius in Julius Caesar, only now of course inevitably the characters are Brute-arse and Cassy-arse. I didn't say that Georgian, Georgian hjour was subtle. <Footer addr ess> Accompanied by Lucius, oh sorry Loose-arse. Garrick played Cassy-arse and the reverend John Hoadly was Brute-arse.
    [Show full text]
  • Old Pendleton District Newsletter Volume 17 No
    JANUARYMEETING January21",7:30 PM CentralLibrary MeetingRoom Planningmeeting for 2003 EVERYONE WELCOME COME SHAREIDEAS! OLD PENDLETONDISTRICT NEWSLETTER VOLTJME17 NO. I January.2003 Published:.lanLrary.Irebruary, March, April, May, June,September, October, Novembcr. And December 2002OITFICtTRS PRESIDENT:CIIARLES IIEAD: E-MAIL: choochoo(@innova.net......864-639-3940 VICE-PRES:JAMES GRANGER: E-Mail: grangeribh)ao|.com.........864-306-8337 SECIRITT'ARY:LaMARR BROOKS-E-MAIl. :ltbrooks(a)inmrva.net. ... fl64-63 9- 1 60 1 TREAS: MA RCARIlT-f E SWAN K- E-MAI L-MarSwank(4ao l.co m. ..864-83 4-37 09 PLIBLICA'l'IONS:LaMARR BROOKS-E-MAIt.-ltbrooks(a)innova.net.tt64-639-I6U1 SOCIAL:EI-AINE GRANGER- E-MAIL-Fergus5OfrD,aol.com. ....864-306-11337 PUBI.ICITY:KEITII MtrRCK :E-MAIt,:Kmerckl/Djuno.com .....864-271-1353 S1'ATE RIr P RtrS EN'f A1'I V E- ANN E SHERI F F : E- MAt t. :S heriff.(4inno va. net NE W S L E ]' TE R- ED I T'O R- MA RG A RE T T E SW AN K rUUO;-UI]41'T]' 203McELHANEY ROAD. APT.25, TRAVELERS RES'[" S.C. 29690-1944 PLTIASIISEND DUES.MEMBERSHIP, ADDRESS CI'IANGF], ARTICLES TO: MARGAREI-TE SWANK. 203 McELHANEY RD" TRAVELERS REST.SC 29690 OLD PENDLETON DISTRICT CHAPTERHOME PAGE ON THE WEB http:i/o ldpend leton. home stead. com Correctionsor additionsto Old PendletonData Base: [email protected] SouthCarolina Genealogical Society on the Web: http://scgen.org NEW IvIEI\,IBERSHIPFOR THE YEAR 2003 Plansand ideaschzurge with useand it has beensuggested that we add E-mails,telephones, addresses and family researchto eachmember name.
    [Show full text]
  • International Journal of Scottish Literature ISSN 1751-2808
    international journal of scottish literature www.ijsl.stir.ac.uk ISSN 1751-2808 ISSUE FOUR, SPRING/SUMMER 2008 Editorial: Caribbean-Scottish Passages Gemma Robinson and Carla Sassi Making a way in the world In Scotland you can reach Guyana by taking the A81 north from Glasgow, or the A84 then A81 from the Crianlarich turnoff on the M80 Motorway at Stirling. Either way you’ll find Guyana – a garden centre in Aberfoyle, specialising in plants, garden arts and crafts sourced from around the world.[1] Robert, the owner, has visited the country before and chose the name as a way of keeping hold of the ‘rainforest connotation’ once back in a more temperate climate. He also recognises the shop’s curiosity value: ‘It would be like finding a shop called “Aberfoyle” in Georgetown, Guyana, although you’d be surprised at how many connections people tell you about’. Driving through Aberfoyle (population 576) on a Sunday afternoon, a Trinidadian, two Jamaicans and two Britons, turned a corner and saw this shop: it was a singular form of Caribbean-Scottish connection. What does it mean to track ‘Caribbean-Scottish passages’? Who is involved in making the passage between the Caribbean and Scotland, historically, culturally and politically? How can we understand the significance of these passages between nations, histories, art-forms, languages and literatures? These are some of the questions that animate this special issue, and the questions that our contributors pose and answer in the articles, art-work and occasional papers that follow. To think about the Caribbean and Scotland in the same horizon of vision is to recognise it as part of a shared world.
    [Show full text]
  • Rembrandt Peale, Charles Willson Peale, and the American Portrait Tradition
    In the Shadow of His Father: Rembrandt Peale, Charles Willson Peale, and the American Portrait Tradition URING His LIFETIME, Rembrandt Peale lived in the shadow of his father, Charles Willson Peale (Fig. 8). In the years that Dfollowed Rembrandt's death, his career and reputation contin- ued to be eclipsed by his father's more colorful and more productive life as successful artist, museum keeper, inventor, and naturalist. Just as Rembrandt's life pales in comparison to his father's, so does his art. When we contemplate the large number and variety of works in the elder Peak's oeuvre—the heroic portraits in the grand manner, sensitive half-lengths and dignified busts, charming conversation pieces, miniatures, history paintings, still lifes, landscapes, and even genre—we are awed by the man's inventiveness, originality, energy, and daring. Rembrandt's work does not affect us in the same way. We feel great respect for his technique, pleasure in some truly beau- tiful paintings, such as Rubens Peale with a Geranium (1801: National Gallery of Art), and intellectual interest in some penetrating char- acterizations, such as his William Findley (Fig. 16). We are impressed by Rembrandt's sensitive use of color and atmosphere and by his talent for clear and direct portraiture. However, except for that brief moment following his return from Paris in 1810 when he aspired to history painting, Rembrandt's work has a limited range: simple half- length or bust-size portraits devoid, for the most part, of accessories or complicated allusions. It is the narrow and somewhat repetitive nature of his canvases in comparison with the extent and variety of his father's work that has given Rembrandt the reputation of being an uninteresting artist, whose work comes to life only in the portraits of intimate friends or members of his family.
    [Show full text]
  • DID JOSHUA REYNOLDS PAINT HIS PICTURES? Matthew C
    DID JOSHUA REYNOLDS PAINT HIS PICTURES? Matthew C. Hunter Did Joshua Reynolds Paint His Pictures? The Transatlantic Work of Picturing in an Age of Chymical Reproduction In the spring of 1787, King George III visited the Royal Academy of Arts at Somerset House on the Strand in London’s West End. The king had come to see the first series of the Seven Sacraments painted by Nicolas Poussin (1594–1665) for Roman patron Cassiano dal Pozzo in the later 1630s. It was Poussin’s Extreme Unction (ca. 1638–1640) (fig. 1) that won the king’s particular praise.1 Below a coffered ceiling, Poussin depicts two trains of mourners converging in a darkened interior as a priest administers last rites to the dying man recumbent on a low bed. Light enters from the left in the elongated taper borne by a barefoot acolyte in a flowing, scarlet robe. It filters in peristaltic motion along the back wall where a projecting, circular molding describes somber totality. Ritual fluids proceed from the right, passing in relay from the cerulean pitcher on the illuminated tripod table to a green-garbed youth then to the gold flagon for which the central bearded elder reaches, to be rubbed as oily film on the invalid’s eyelids. Secured for twenty-first century eyes through a spectacular fund-raising campaign in 2013 by Cambridge’s Fitzwilliam Museum, Poussin’s picture had been put before the king in the 1780s by no less spirited means. Working for Charles Manners, fourth Duke of Rutland, a Scottish antiquarian named James Byres had Poussin’s Joshua Reynolds, Sacraments exported from Rome and shipped to London where they Diana (Sackville), Viscountess Crosbie were cleaned and exhibited under the auspices of Royal Academy (detail, see fig.
    [Show full text]
  • History and Antiquities of Stratford-Upon-Avon
    IL LINO I S UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA-CHAMPAIGN PRODUCTION NOTE University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Library Brittle Books Project, 2009. UNIVERSrryOF ILLINOIS-URBANA ' 3 0112 079790793 C) c)J U0 CI 0F 622-5 CV157 111STORY & ANTIQUITIES STR4TF RkDi U]PO~A I1 ONA"r III c iI1Pir . i r M t a r HISTORY AND ANTIQUITIES OF 5TJRATFORDJPONAVON: fO MPRISI N C A DESCRIPTION OF THlE COLLEGIATE CHURCH,7 THE LIFE OF SJL4KSPEAJRJ, AN Copies of several Documents relating to him anti his Pamniy never before printed; WITH A 13IOGt4PII1C4L SKETCH OF OTHER -V MJNENT CILIRACT2PS , Natives of, or who have resided in STRITFORD, To which, is added, a particular Account of THE- JUBILEE, Celebrated at Stratford, in Honour of our immortal Bard, BYT R. B. WIIELER. 0 gratum Musis, 0 nornen. amabile Plwcbo, Qtam sociarn adsciscant, Minicius atque Meles. Ac tibi, cara hospes, si mens divinior, et te Ignea SiKSPEARI muss ciere queat; Siste gradum; crebroquc oculos circum undique liectas, Pierii lae inontes, hec tOb Pindus erit. &ttatfouYon5ivbon: PRTNTED AND~ SOLD BY J. WARD; SOLD ALSO BYVLONGISAN AND CO.PATERNOSTERa ROW, LONDON'S WILKS AND CO. BIRIMINGHAM, AN!) BY MOST OTHER BOOKSELLERS IN TOWN AND COUNTIRY W2,2. Z3 cws;-7 PREFACE., FIE want of a work in some degree sifilar to the. res sent undertaking eatcouraged the publication of the follow4 ilig sheets, the'offspring oft afew leisure hours; and it is hoped that the world will, on an impartial perusal, make aflowanees for the imperfections, by reflecting as well upon the inexperieace of the Jiuvenile author, as that they were originally collected for"his own private information.
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Roman Empire
    EDITIONLAUSANNE Limited to one tbousand registered sets N0.4'7 THE DECLINEAND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE VOL. I1 THE HISTORY OF THE DECLINE AND FALL OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE BY EDWARD GIBBON EDITED BY J. B. BURY, M.A. WITH AN INTRODUCTION BY THE RT. HON. W. E. H. LECKY VOL. I1 NEW YORK FRED DE FAU & COMPANY PUBLISHERS COPYRIGHT,I+, FRED DE FAU & COMPANY. CONTENTS OF THE SECOND VOLUME PACE... LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS......... xu1 CHAPTER X The Emperors Decks. Gallus. Amilianus. Valerian. and Galliersur - The General Irruption of the Barbarians - The Thirty Tyrads A.D. 248-268 The Nature of the Subject .......i The Emperor Philip .........a 249 Services.Revolt. Victory. and Reign of the Emperor Decius . a 250 He marchesagainst the Goths ......3 Origin of the Goths from Scandinavia .....4 Religion of the Goths ........5 Institutions and Death of Odin .......6 Agreeable. but uncertainHypothesis concerning Odin . 6 Emigration of the Goths fromScandinavia into Prussia . 7 -from Prussia to theUkraine ...... 8 The Gothic Nation increases in its March .... 9 Distinction of the Germans and Sarmatians ....10 Description ofUkraine the ......10 The Goths invade the Roman Provinces .....11 250 Various Events of the Gothic War ... ..12 251 Decius revives the ofice of Censor in the Person of Valerian . 14 The Design Impracticable. and without Effect ....15 Defeat and Death of Decius and his Son .....16 251 Election of Gallus .........IS 252 Retreat of the Goths ....... 18 gallus purchases Peace by the Payment of an annual Tnbut; 18 Popular Discontent .........19 253 Victory and Revolt of Ahilianus ......20 Gallus abandoned and slain .......20 Valerian revenges the Death of Gallus .....21 Is acknowledged Emperor ........21 'i Character of Valerian ....
    [Show full text]
  • Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical ‘Governor’
    Early Theatre 11.2 (2008) Christopher Matusiak Christopher Beeston and the Caroline Office of Theatrical ‘Governor’ The decision in February 1637 to appoint Christopher Beeston (alias Hut- chinson) ‘Gouuernor of the new Company of the Kings & Queenes boyes’ crowned one of the busiest and most innovative careers in seventeenth-cen- tury commercial theatre.1 Beeston had emerged in the 1590s as a young per- former in the Chamberlain’s Men, notably acting with Richard Burbage, Wil- liam Kempe, and William Shakespeare in the first production of Ben Jonson’s Every Man in His Humour. For the better part of the next two decades, he managed the financial affairs of Queen Anne’s Men at the Red Bull and with that company’s assets at his disposal, particularly its valuable wardrobe, he oversaw the building of west London’s first playhouse in 1616 — the Cock- pit (or Phoenix) in Drury Lane. By 1636, Beeston had established himself as London’s pre-eminent theatrical entrepreneur, having led Queen Henri- etta Maria’s fashionable company for ten years and amassed an unpreced- ented personal treasury of playbooks, acting apparel, and other tiring house materials. However, in May of that year the worst outbreak of plague in three decades closed the theatres and suppressed business until the following October 1637. Under the stress of eighteenth months of enforced idleness, acting companies buckled, setting patents and personnel adrift. Among the casualties was Beeston’s relationship with the Queen’s Men. From his van- tage point at the competing Salisbury
    [Show full text]
  • Sources of Langham Local History Information 11Th C > 19Th C
    Langham in Rutland Local History Sources of Information Compiled by Nigel Webb Revision 2 - 11 November 2020 Contents Introduction 11th to 13th century 14th century 15th century 16th century 17th century 18th century 19th century Please select one of the above Introduction The intention of this list of possible sources is to provide starting points for researchers. Do not be put off by the length of the list: you will probably need only a fraction of it. For the primary sources – original documents or transcriptions of these – efforts have been made to include everything which might be productive. If you know of or find further such sources which should be on this list, please tell the Langham Village History Group archivist so that they can be added. If you find a source that we have given particularly productive, please tell us what needs it has satisfied; if you are convinced that it is a waste of time, please tell us this too! For the secondary sources – books, journals and internet sites – we have tried to include just enough useful ones, whatever aspect of Langham history that you might wish to investigate. However, we realise that there is then a danger of the list looking discouragingly long. Probably you will want to look at only a fraction of these. For many of the books, just a single chapter or a small section found from the index, or even a sentence, here and there, useful for quotation, is all that you may want. But, again, if you find or know of further especially useful sources, please tell us.
    [Show full text]