DOCSLIB.ORG

Mating Systems and Sexual Dimorphism in Mass in Microtines

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mating Systems and Sexual Dimorphism in Mass in Microtines MATING SYSTEMS AND SEXUAL DIMORPHISMIN MASS IN MICROTINES R. BOONSTRA, B. S. GILBERT, AND C. J. KREBS Division of Life Sciences, ScarboroughCampus, Universityof Toronto, 1265 Military Trail, Scarborough,Ontario, Canada M1C 1A4 (RB) Kluane Lake ResearchStation, Mile 1054 Alaska Highway, Yukon,Canada Y1A 3 V4 (BSG) Departmentof Zoology,The Universityof BritishColumbia, 6270 UniversityBoulevard, Vancouver, B.C., Canada V6T 2A9 (CJK) Sexual dimorphismin body size is expected to vary as a function of mating system. Heske and Ostfeld (1990, J. Mammal.71:510-519) foundno differencein body-lengthdimorphism between the majorityof promiscuousand monogamousmicrotines. In five species we used body mass and in three species, length of body to test the robustnessof these findings. We found no significantdimorphism in length of body in any species, but significantdimorphism in body mass in all species, independentof mating system. We proposethat 1) mass rather than length is the measure needed to assess dimorphismin microtines,and 2) the bias in favor of large males should rank as follows with respect to mating system: facultative monogamy= polygyny > promiscuity> obligate monogamy. Key words: Microtus, sexual dimorphism,mating systems, body mass Sexual dimorphism is expected to occur rank as follows with respect to mating sys- when one sex competes for access to the tem: polygynous > promiscuous > monog- other (Darwin, 1871). In mammals, where amous. In contrast, in a comparative study the dominant mating system is polygyny on microtine species of the generaMicrotus (Kleiman, 1977) and where males do the and Clethrionomys, Heske and Ostfeld competing, they may obtain an advantage (1990) found the following rankingwith re- by being large (Reiss, 1989). Emlen and Or- spect to sexual dimorphism:polygynous > ing (1977) predictedthat the greaterthe po- promiscuous= monogamous.None of their tential for multiple-mate monopolization, monogamous species and only one of 12 the more intenseintrasexual selection should promiscuous species showed male-biased be and hence the greater the tendency for sexual dimorphism. Two of the promiscu- polygyny. Thus, knowledge of the mating ous species showed female-biasedsexual di- system should allow one to predict the de- morphism. These results are counter-intu- gree of sexual dimorphism: in polygynous itive and we believe they are incorrect mating systems, where one male has exclu- becauselength of body ratherthan mass was sive access to multiple females, selection used as a measure of sexual dimorphism. should cause dimorphism to be greatest;in a promiscuousmating system, whereno one METHODS male exclusive access to a may gain female, evidence to examine sex- should be and in We used two lines of dimorphism less; finally, ual in microtines.To avoid a where each dimorphism drawing monogamous mating system, conclusionsfrom comparisons in whichdifferent male has exclusive access to only one fe- aged cohortswere included,both our tests in- male, dimorphism should be minimal. volved examiningonly animalsthat had over- Therefore,the expectation is that sexual di- wintered.First, a populationof Microtuspenn- morphism (male/female body size) would sylvanicuswas intensivelylive-trapped at the J. Mamm., 74(1):224-229, 1993 224 February1993 BOONSTRAET AL.-SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN MICROTINES 225 onset of breedingand the mass of males and pennsylvanicus,is known to have a mating femalesdetermined. The majordisadvantage of system with female territorialityand male usingmass from live-trapped animals to assess promiscuity (Boonstra and Rodd, 1983; is thatthe of dimorphism earlystages pregnancy Madison, 1980; Ostfeld et al., 1988; Web- cannotbe detectedand hencemay makemales ster and Heske and Ost- and femalesmore similarthan are. Brooks, 1981), yet they really feld's results indicate that this However,if dimorphismwere to be found in (1990) spe- spiteof thisbias, it wouldonly serve to strength- cies is monomorphic with respect to length. en the conclusionthat the sexes weredifferent Fig. 1 shows the distributionof body masses withrespect to mass.From March to May 1983, of field-capturedvoles on 30 March 1983, a dense population of M. p. pennsylvanicuswas excludingobviously pregnantfemales. Males live-trappedweekly for 2 days/weekat a sitenear (X = 47.9 g, SD 6.09, n = 105) were sig- Toronto,Ontario, and females were removed near nificantlyheavier than females (X = 39.9 g, theend of pregnancyto allowparturition to occur SD 4.91, n = 86)(t = 9.86, d.f = 189, P < in the laboratory.Thus, we knewthe pregnancy 0.0001). The male:femaleratio is thus 1.20:1 statusof most femalesand hencewere able to compared with that of between 0.99:1 and minimizethe effectof pregnancyon bodymass. 1.04:1 for the three subspecies obtained by Breedinghad not occurredthe previouswinter and sincealmost no animalssurvived to breed Heske and Ostfeld (1990). Our study thus in 2 differentyears (Cockburn, 1988), the voles indicated a pronouncedsexual dimorphism presentin Marchmust have been born in the in this promiscuous species. Second, signif- previoussummer and autumnand thus were icant sexual dimorphism in mass, but not similarin age. Whentrapping started in March length, occurred in all species examined only 10%of themales were in breedingcondition throughautopsy (Table 1). Thus, males were and none of the females were pregnant. By 30 significantlyheavier than females in all spe- March, 96% of the males were in breedingcon- cies independent of mating system. These ditionand 6%of the femaleswere pregnant.No results are similar to those found by Dews- other females had a litter before 14 April. bury et al. (1980) in a laboratory study of Second,we collectedsamples of four species animals in three species of Mi- of voles and performedautopsies, thus allowing equal-aged crotus. us to subtractthe contribution of pregnancyto body mass in females. In the southern Yukon, Therefore,we believe that Heske and Ost- we obtainedsnap-trap samples ofM. oeconomus, feld (1990) used the wrong index to assess M. pennsylvanicus,and C. rutilus from 1974- sexual dimorphism in microtines. All stud- 1977(see Krebsand Wingate, 1985 for details). ies that we know of in microtines indicate Only overwinteredanimals collected in spring mass is the crucial measure and the consis- (April-June)were included in the analysisand tent result is that heavier males are domi- springsamples were pooled. In southernBritish nant or have greaterbreeding success than we obtaineda of over- Columbia, largesample lighter males (Kawata, 1988; Sheridanand winteredM. townsendiifrom 6 Marchto 29 April Turnerand 1974 1976for de- Tamarin, 1988; Iverson, 1973). usinglive-traps (see Boonstra, none of these studies mea- tails).In bothstudies, plusuterine mass Unfortunately, embryo sured of so weretaken in pregnantfemales and this was sub- length body, a similar assess- tractedfrom total mass to obtain body mass ment is not possible. Other species of mam- comparableto thatof males.In theformer study, mals show the same advantage of being lengthof body(excluding length of tail)and body heavier (e.g., Mus musculus-Franks and masswere recorded; in thelatter study only body Lenington, 1986; Cervuselaphus-Clutton- masswas recorded. Brock et al., 1982; Sciurus vulgaris-Wau- ters and Dhondt, 1989). It is likely that the RESULTS AND DISCUSSION differences in the relationship between length Our two methods to assess sexual di- and body mass in males and females do morphism were consistent and showed the not occur until puberty, but thereafter an- same result. First, the meadow vole, drogenic and estrogenic hormones act to dif- M.. 226 JOURNALOF MAMMALOGY Vol74, No. 1 MICROTUS 16 PENNSYLVANICUS U MALES FEMALES 12. [ c u 30 35 4 I45 50 55 60 65 BODY WEIGHTS - g FIG.1.--Distribution of body mass of a populationof M. pennsylvanicusfrom southern Ontario on 30 March1985. ferentiate between the sexes (Glucksmann, found by Heske and Ostfeld (1990), but also 1974; Widdowson, 1976; Wilson and Fos- contraryto our prediction that polygynous ter, 1985). Androgens working in conjunc- species should have the largestmales. Why? tion with growthhormone are known to have The generalityof our conclusions could be an additional anabolic effecton protein syn- strengthenedby includingmore specieswith thesis, causing increasedprotein deposition various mating systems. However, we pro- to all partsof the body, especiallyto skeletal pose that for microtines, a largersample of muscle and cartilage. Our results indicate species will show the followingtrend in sex- that in adult breeding microtines, length of ual dimorphism with respect to mating sys- body is similar in both sexes, but males are tem: facultative monogamy = polygyny > more robust. promiscuity > obligate monogamy. A mo- The most pronounced sexual dimor- nogamous and a polygynousmating system phism in mass occurred in M. townsendii, are closely related if the males can switch a species that primarily is monogamous between either tactic and thus selection (Lambin and Krebs, 1991). The least-pro- should operate to give largermales a com- nounced sexual dimorphism in mass oc- petitive advantage if polygyny is a possi- curredin C rutilus,a promiscuous species, bility. Monogamyis known to occurin three which Heske and Ostfeld (1990) found to Microtusspecies, but in at least two of them exhibit female-biased sexual dimorphism. it is facultative. Lambin and Krebs (1991) Thus, our rankingof sexual dimorphism in found that althoughmonogamy was the pre- mass relative to mating system was
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Courtship Behavior in the Dwarf Seahorse, Hippocampuszosterae
    Copeia, 1996(3), pp. 634-640 Courtship Behavior in the Dwarf Seahorse, Hippocampuszosterae HEATHER D. MASONJONESAND SARA M. LEWIS The seahorse genus Hippocampus (Syngnathidae) exhibits extreme morpho- logical specialization for paternal care, with males incubating eggs within a highly vascularized brood pouch. Dwarf seahorses, H. zosterae, form monoga- mous pairs that court early each morning until copulation takes place. Daily behavioral observations of seahorse pairs (n = 15) were made from the day of introduction through the day of copulation. Four distinct phases of seahorse courtship are marked by prominent behavioral changes, as well as by differences in the intensity of courtship. The first courtship phase occurs for one or two mornings preceding the day of copulation and is characterized by reciprocal quivering, consisting of rapid side-to-side body vibrations displayed alternately by males and females. The remaining courtship phases are restricted to the day of copulation, with the second courtship phase distinguished by females pointing, during which the head is raised upward. In the third courtship phase, males begin to point in response to female pointing. During the final phase of courtship, seahorse pairs repeatedly rise together in the water column, eventually leading to females transferring their eggs directly into the male brood pouch during a brief midwater copulation. Courtship activity level (representing the percentage of time spent in courtship) increased from relatively low levels during the first courtship phase to highly active courtship on the day of copulation. Males more actively initiated courtship on the days preceding copulation, indicating that these seahorses are not courtship-role reversed, as has previously been assumed.
    [Show full text]
  • Mate Choice | Principles of Biology from Nature Education
    contents Principles of Biology 171 Mate Choice Reproduction underlies many animal behaviors. The greater sage grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). Female sage grouse evaluate males as sexual partners on the basis of the feather ornaments and the males' elaborate displays. Stephen J. Krasemann/Science Source. Topics Covered in this Module Mating as a Risky Behavior Major Objectives of this Module Describe factors associated with specific patterns of mating and life history strategies of specific mating patterns. Describe how genetics contributes to behavioral phenotypes such as mating. Describe the selection factors influencing behaviors like mate choice. page 882 of 989 3 pages left in this module contents Principles of Biology 171 Mate Choice Mating as a Risky Behavior Different species have different mating patterns. Different species have evolved a range of mating behaviors that vary in the number of individuals involved and the length of time over which their relationships last. The most open type of relationship is promiscuity, in which all members of a community can mate with each other. Within a promiscuous species, an animal of either gender may mate with any other male or female. No permanent relationships develop between mates, and offspring cannot be certain of the identity of their fathers. Promiscuous behavior is common in bonobos (Pan paniscus), as well as their close relatives, the chimpanzee (P. troglodytes). Bonobos also engage in sexual activity for activities other than reproduction: to greet other members of the community, to release social tensions, and to resolve conflicts. Test Yourself How might promiscuous behavior provide an evolutionary advantage for males? Submit Some animals demonstrate polygamous relationships, in which a single individual of one gender mates with multiple individuals of the opposite gender.
    [Show full text]
  • The Significance of Mating System and Nonbreeding Behavior to Population and Forest Patch Use by Migrant Birds1
    The Significance of Mating System and Nonbreeding Behavior to Population and Forest Patch Use by Migrant Birds1 Eugene S. Morton2 and Bridget J. M. Stutchbury3 ________________________________________ Abstract Why Migrants are Lost from Migratory birds are birds of two worlds, breeding in Fragments: The Role of their the temperate zone then living as tropical birds for Extra-Pair Mating Systems most of the year. We show two aspects of this unique Extra-pair mating systems characterize temperate zone biology that are important considerations for their breeding birds (Stutchbury and Morton 1995). Both conservation. First, habitat selection for breeding must males and females leave territories to pursue copula- include their need for extra-pair mating opportunities. tions with neighbors (Stutchbury 1998). The increase Second, non-breeding distributions in tropical latitudes in reproductive output in males successful in this pur- are poorly known. Both geographic distribution and suit is considerable (Stutchbury et al. 1997). Females over-wintering habitat are much more limited than choose better males by leaving their own territory to generally thought, suggesting that many species may copulate with neighboring males (Neudorf el al. 1997). be in more danger of population limitation there than The extra-pair mating system of the well studied presently thought. Tropical population limitation can Hooded Warbler (Wilsonia citrina) is typical of most result in migratory birds being eliminated from forest temperate zone birds but especially for long distance fragments, not due to fragmentation per se but to the migrants (Birkhead 1998, Chuang et al. 1999, Stutch- need for extra-pair mating opportunities. bury et al. 2005).
    [Show full text]
  • Factors Influencing the Diversification of Mating Behavior of Animals
    International Journal of Zoology and Animal Biology ISSN: 2639-216X Factors Influencing the Diversification of Mating Behavior of Animals Afzal S1,2*, Shah SS1,2, Afzal T1, Javed RZ1, Batool F1, Salamat S1 and Review Article Raza A1 Volume 2 Issue 2 1Department of zoology, university of Narowal, Pakistan Received Date: January 28, 2019 Published Date: April 24, 2019 2Department of zoology, university of Punjab, Pakistan DOI: 10.23880/izab-16000145 *Corresponding author: Sabila Afzal, Department of zoology, University of Punjab, Pakistan, Email: [email protected] Abstract “Mating system” of a population refers to the general behavioral strategy employed in obtaining mates. In most of them one sex is more philopatric than the other. Reproductive enhancement through increased access to mates or resources and the avoidance of inbreeding are important in promoting sex differences in dispersal. In birds it is usually females which disperse more than males; in mammals it is usually males which disperse more than females. It is argued that the direction of the sex bias is a consequence of the type of mating system. Philopatry will favor the evolution of cooperative traits between members of the sedentary sex. It includes monogamy, Polygyny, polyandry and promiscuity. As an evolutionary strategy, mating systems have some “flexibility”. The existence of extra-pair copulation shows that mating systems identified on the basis of behavioral observations may not accord with actual breeding systems as determined by genetic analysis. Mating systems influence the effectiveness of the contraceptive control of pest animals. This method of control is most effective in monogamous and polygamous species.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Systems, Sperm Competition, and the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism in Birds
    Evolution, 55(1), 2001, pp. 161±175 MATING SYSTEMS, SPERM COMPETITION, AND THE EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL DIMORPHISM IN BIRDS PETER O. DUNN,1,2 LINDA A. WHITTINGHAM,1 AND TREVOR E. PITCHER3 1Department of Biological Sciences, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, P.O. Box 413, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53201 2E-mail: [email protected] 3Department of Zoology, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario, M5S 3G5, Canada Abstract. Comparative analyses suggest that a variety of factors in¯uence the evolution of sexual dimorphism in birds. We analyzed the relative importance of social mating system and sperm competition to sexual differences in plumage and body size (mass and tail and wing length) of more than 1000 species of birds from throughout the world. In these analyses we controlled for phylogeny and a variety of ecological and life-history variables. We used testis size (corrected for total body mass) as an index of sperm competition in each species, because testis size is correlated with levels of extrapair paternity and is available for a large number of species. In contrast to recent studies, we found strong and consistent effects of social mating system on most forms of dimorphism. Social mating system strongly in¯uenced dimorphism in plumage, body mass, and wing length and had some effect on dimorphism in tail length. Sexual dimorphism was relatively greater in species with polygynous or lekking than monogamous mating systems. This was true when we used both species and phylogenetically independent contrasts for analysis. Relative testis size was also related positively to dimorphism in tail and wing length, but in most analyses it was a poorer predictor of plumage dimorphism than social mating system.
    [Show full text]
  • Redalyc.Mating Behavior and Female Accompaniment in the Whiptail
    Biota Neotropica ISSN: 1676-0611 [email protected] Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Brasil Barros Ribeiro, Leonardo; Gogliath, Melissa; Fernandes Dantas de Sales, Raul; Xavier Freire, Eliza Maria Mating behavior and female accompaniment in the whiptail lizard Cnemidophorus ocellifer (Squamata, Teiidae) in the Caatinga region of northeastern Brazil Biota Neotropica, vol. 11, núm. 4, 2011, pp. 363-368 Instituto Virtual da Biodiversidade Campinas, Brasil Available in: http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=199122242031 How to cite Complete issue Scientific Information System More information about this article Network of Scientific Journals from Latin America, the Caribbean, Spain and Portugal Journal's homepage in redalyc.org Non-profit academic project, developed under the open access initiative Biota Neotrop., vol. 11, no. 4 Mating behavior and female accompaniment in the whiptail lizard Cnemidophorus ocellifer (Squamata, Teiidae) in the Caatinga region of northeastern Brazil Leonardo Barros Ribeiro1,2,3,5, Melissa Gogliath1,4, Raul Fernandes Dantas de Sales1,4 & Eliza Maria Xavier Freire1,2,4 1Laboratório de Herpetologia, Departamento de Botânica, Ecologia e Zoologia, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Av. Senador Salgado Filho, 3000, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, CEP 59072-970, Natal, RN, Brasil 2Programa Regional de Pós-graduação em Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Av. Senador Salgado Filho, 3000, Campus Universitário Lagoa Nova, CEP 59072-970, Natal, RN, Brasil 3Centro de Conservação e Manejo de Fauna da Caatinga – CEMAFAUNA-CAATINGA, Universidade Federal do Vale do São Francisco – UNIVASF, Campus Ciências Agrárias, Colegiado de Ciências Biológicas, Rod. BR 407, Km 12, Lote 543, s/n, C1, CEP 56300-990, Petrolina, PE, Brasil 4Programa de Pós-graduação em Psicobiologia, Departamento de Fisiologia, Centro de Biociências, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Norte – UFRN, Av.
    [Show full text]
  • POLYGYNANDRY in the DUSKY PIPEFISH <I>
    UC Irvine UC Irvine Previously Published Works Title POLYGYNANDRY IN THE DUSKY PIPEFISH SYNGNATHUS FLORIDAE REVEALED BY MICROSATELLITE DNA MARKERS. Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/14f2j0rs Journal Evolution, 51(5) ISSN 0014-3820 Authors Jones, Adam G Avise, John C Publication Date 1997-10-01 DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1997.tb01484.x License https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ 4.0 Peer reviewed eScholarship.org Powered by the California Digital Library University of California Evolution, 51(5),1997, pp. 1611-1622 POLYGYNANDRY IN THE DUSKY PIPEFISH SYNGNATHUS FLORIDAE REVEALED BY MICROSATELLITE DNA MARKERS ADAM G. JONES1 AND JOHN C. AVISE Department of Genetics, University of Georgia. Athens, Georgia 30602 Abstract.-In the dusky pipefish Syngnathus floridae, like other species in the family Syngnathidae, 'pregnant' males provide all post-zygotic care. Male pregnancy has interesting implications for sexual selection theory and the evolution of mating systems. Here, we employ microsatellite markers to describe the genetic mating system of S. floridae, compare the outcome with a previous report of genetic polyandry for the Gulf pipefish S. scovelli, and consider possible associations between the mating system and degree of sexual dimorphism in these species. Twenty-two pregnant male dusky pipefish from one locale in the northern Gulf of Mexico were analyzed genetically, together with subsamples of 42 embryos from each male's brood pouch. Adult females also were assayed. The genotypes observed in these samples document that cuckoldry by males did not occur; males often receive eggs from multiple females during the course of a pregnancy (six males had one mate each, 13 had two mates, and three had three mates); embryos from different females are segregated spatially within a male's brood pouch; and a female's clutch of eggs often is divided among more than one male.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mating System of the Brown Bear Ursus Arctos
    Mammal Rev. 2012, Volume 42, No. 1, 12–34. Printed in Singapore. REVIEW The mating system of the brown bear Ursus arctos Sam M. J. G. STEYAERT*† Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Street 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria, and Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences Pb. 5003 NO-1432 Ås, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Anders ENDRESTØL*† Department of Animal and Aquacultural Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences Pb. 5003 NO-1432 Ås, Norway, and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, Gaustadalléen 21 NO-0349 Oslo, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Klaus HACKLÄNDER Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Street 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria. E-mail: [email protected] Jon E. SWENSON Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences Pb. 5003 NO-1432 Ås, Norway, and Norwegian Institute for Nature Research, NO-7485 Trondheim, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] Andreas ZEDROSSER Institute of Wildlife Biology and Game Management, Department of Integrative Biology and Biodiversity Research, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Gregor-Mendel-Street 33, 1180 Vienna, Austria, and Department of Ecology and Natural Resource Management, Norwegian University of Life Sciences Pb. 5003 NO-1432 Ås, Norway. E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACTmam_184 12..34 1. Research on mating systems and reproductive strategies is valuable for providing ethological knowledge, important for the management and conservation of a species, and in a broader sense, important for biodiversity conservation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dynamics of Male Brooding, Mating Patterns, and Sex Roles in Pipefishes and Seahorses (Family Syngnathidae)
    Evolution, 57(6), 2003, pp. 1374±1386 THE DYNAMICS OF MALE BROODING, MATING PATTERNS, AND SEX ROLES IN PIPEFISHES AND SEAHORSES (FAMILY SYNGNATHIDAE) ANTHONY B. WILSON,1,2 INGRID AHNESJOÈ ,3 AMANDA C. J. VINCENT,4,5 AND AXEL MEYER1,6 1Department of Biology, University of Konstanz, 78457 Konstanz, Germany 3Department of Animal Ecology, Evolutionary Biology Centre, Uppsala University, NorbyvaÈgen 18D, S-752 36 Uppsala, Sweden 4Department of Biology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec H3A 1B1, Canada 6E-mail: [email protected] Abstract. Modern theory predicts that relative parental investment of the sexes in their young is a key factor responsible for sexual selection. Seahorses and pipe®shes (family Syngnathidae) are extraordinary among ®shes in their remarkable adaptations for paternal care and frequent occurrences of sex-role reversals (i.e., female-female competition for mates), offering exceptional opportunities to test predictions of sexual selection theory. During mating, the female transfers eggs into or onto specialized egg-brooding structures that are located on either the male's abdomen or its tail, where they are osmoregulated, aerated, and nourished by specially adapted structures. All syngnathid males exhibit this form of parental care but the brooding structures vary, ranging from the simple ventral gluing areas of some pipe®shes to the completely enclosed pouches found in seahorses. We present a molecular phylogeny that indicates that the di- versi®cation of pouch types is positively correlated with the major evolutionary radiation of the group, suggesting that this extreme development and diversi®cation of paternal care may have been an important evolutionary innovation of the Syngnathidae.
    [Show full text]
  • 'Polygynous' Mammal: Mating System Variation in Neotoma Fuscipes
    Animal Behaviour 77 (2009) 449–455 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Animal Behaviour journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/yanbe Another genetically promiscuous ‘polygynous’ mammal: mating system variation in Neotoma fuscipes M.B. McEachern a,*, Richard L. McElreath b,1, Dirk H. Van Vuren a,2, John M. Eadie a,2 a Department of Wildlife Fish and Conservation Biology, University of California, Davis b Department of Anthropology, University of California, Davis article info Polygyny is widely thought to be the dominant mating system in mammals. However, more recent Article history: genetic work casts doubt on this view. Variation in mating systems has been found in both males and Received 29 July 2008 females within and across mammalian species. The causes and consequences of mating system variation Initial acceptance 4 September 2008 have important implications for understanding the population and evolutionary dynamics of species. To Final acceptance 17 October 2008 better understand mating system variation, both in mammals and more generally, this study analyses Published online 6 December 2008 genetic mating system variation in dusky-footed woodrats, Neotoma fuscipes. Contrary to expectation, MS. number: A08-00486 there was little support for polygyny at the genetic level. Instead, the study populations were charac- terized by promiscuity and monogamy, in both males and females. At higher densities, variance in the Keywords: numbers of mates and offspring were higher in breeding males than in females, as is often observed. dusky-footed woodrat However, this trend was reversed in low-density, coniferous forest habitat. Model selection revealed that genetic mating system the best model of successfully mated pairs includes population density, operational sex ratio and indi- monogamy Neotoma fuscipes vidual pairwise distances as predictors.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Systems and Sexual Selection in Male-Pregnant Pipefishes And
    Mating Systems and Sexual Selection in Male-Pregnant Pipefishes and Seahorses: Insights from Microsatellite-Based Studies of Maternity A. G. Jones and J. C. Avise In pipefishes and seahorses (family Syngnathidae), the males provide all postzy- gotic care of offspring by brooding embryos on their ventral surfaces. In some species, this phenomenon of male ‘‘pregnancy’’ results in a reversal of the usual direction of sexual selection, such that females compete more than males for ac- cess to mates, and secondary sexual characteristics evolve in females. Thus the syngnathids can provide critical tests of theories related to the evolution of sex differences and sexual selection. Microsatellite-based studies of the genetic mating systems of several species of pipefishes and seahorses have provided insights into important aspects of the natural history and evolution of these fishes. First, males of species with completely enclosed pouches have complete confidence of paternity, as might be predicted from parental investment theory for species in which males invest so heavily in offspring. Second, a wide range of genetic mating systems have been documented in nature, including genetic monogamy in a sea- horse, polygynandry in two species of pipefish, and polyandry in a third pipefish species. The genetic mating systems appear to be causally related to the intensity of sexual selection, with secondary sex characters evolving most often in females of the more polyandrous species. Third, genetic studies of captive-breeding pipe- fish suggest that the sexual selection gradient (or Bateman gradient) may be a substantially better method for characterizing the mating system than previously available techniques. Finally, these genetic studies of syngnathid mating systems have led to some general insights into the occurrence of clustered mutations at microsatellite loci, the utility of linked loci in studies of parentage, and the use of parentage data for direct estimation of adult population size.
    [Show full text]
  • Mating Behavior and Chemical Communication in the Order Hymenoptera
    P1: FXY November 15, 2000 11:58 Annual Reviews AR119-02 Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2001. 46:31–78 Copyright c 2001 by Annual Reviews. All rights reserved MATING BEHAVIOR AND CHEMICAL COMMUNICATION IN THE ORDER HYMENOPTERA M. Ayasse,1 R. J. Paxton,2 and J. Tengo¨3 1Institute of Zoology, Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria; e-mail: [email protected] 2Institute of Zoology, University of Tubingen,¨ D-72076 Tubingen,¨ Germany 3Ecological Research Station, Uppsala University, S-38693 Farjestaden,¨ Sweden Key Words sex pheromones, mating strategies, chemistry, behavior, chemical mimicry ■ Abstract Insects of the order Hymenoptera are biologically and economically important members of natural and agro ecosystems and exhibit diverse biologies, mat- ing systems, and sex pheromones. We review what is known of their sex pheromone chemistry and function, paying particular emphasis to the Hymenoptera Aculeata (pri- marily ants, bees, and sphecid and vespid wasps), and provide a framework for the functional classification of their sex pheromones. Sex pheromones often comprise multicomponent blends derived from numerous exocrine tissues, including the cuti- cle. However, very few sex pheromones have been definitively characterized using bioassays, in part because of the behavioral sophistication of many Aculeata. The rel- ative importance of species isolation versus sexual selection in shaping sex pheromone evolution is still unclear. Many species appear to discriminate among mates at the level of individual or kin/colony, and they use antiaphrodisiacs. Some orchids use hymenopteran sex pheromones to dupe males into performing pseudocopulation, with extreme species specificity. CONTENTS Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2001.46:31-78.
    [Show full text]