DOCSLIB.ORG

Archaeological Sites Technical Study

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Archaeological Sites Technical Study Appendix K Archaeological Sites Technical Study In coordination with Oklahoma DOT Archaeological Sites Technical Study Prepared by July 2016 Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Service Type Descriptions .............................................................................................. 1-4 1.1.1 Conventional Rail .......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.2 Higher-Speed Rail ......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.3 High-Speed Rail ............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2 Alternative Descriptions ................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.1 No Build Alternative ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.2 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth ....................................... 1-6 1.2.3 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio ............................................. 1-7 1.2.4 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas .......................................................... 1-8 1.2.5 Station Cities ................................................................................................................. 1-9 2.0 Regulatory Requirements ........................................................................................................ 2-1 2.1.1 Federal Laws, Regulations, and Executive Orders ...................................................... 2-1 2.1.2 State Laws and Regulations ........................................................................................ 2-2 3.0 Evaluation Methods ................................................................................................................. 3-1 3.1 Data Sources ................................................................................................................... 3-1 3.2 Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 3-2 3.3 NRHP Significance Criteria ............................................................................................. 3-2 3.4 Service-Level Analysis ..................................................................................................... 3-2 4.0 Baseline/Affected Environment .............................................................................................. 4-1 4.1 EIS Study Area ................................................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Brief Prehistoric Cultural Background of Region .......................................................... 4-1 4.2.1 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth ....................................... 4-2 4.2.2 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio ........................................... 4-11 4.2.3 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas ........................................................ 4-14 4.3 Archaeological Sites ..................................................................................................... 4-17 5.0 Effects on Archaeological Sites ............................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 No Build Alternative ........................................................................................................ 5-3 5.2 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth ......................................... 5-3 5.2.1 Alternative N4A Conventional Rail ............................................................................... 5-3 5.3 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio ............................................... 5-4 5.3.1 Alternative C4A Higher-Speed Rail .............................................................................. 5-4 5.3.2 Alternative C4A High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-5 5.3.3 Alternative C4B Higher-Speed Rail .............................................................................. 5-6 5.3.4 Alternative C4B High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-6 5.3.5 Alternative C4C Higher-Speed Rail .............................................................................. 5-7 5.3.6 Alternative C4C High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-8 Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study July 2016 Archaeological Sites Technical Study Page iii TBG111814093418SCO Contents 5.4 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas ............................................................ 5-9 5.4.1 Alternative S4 Higher-Speed Rail ................................................................................. 5-9 5.4.2 Alternative S6 Higher-Speed Rail ............................................................................... 5-10 5.4.3 Alternative S6 High-Speed Rail .................................................................................. 5-10 6.0 Avoidance, Minimization, and Mitigation Strategies .............................................................. 6-1 7.0 Summary .................................................................................................................................. 7-1 8.0 References ............................................................................................................................... 8-1 9.0 Preparers .................................................................................................................................. 9-1 List of Figures 1-1: Build Alternatives ............................................................................................................................ 1-2 4-1: Index Map ..................................................................................................................................... 4-26 4-2: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 1 ................................... 4-27 4-3: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 2 ................................... 4-28 4-4: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 3 ................................... 4-29 4-5: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 4 ................................... 4-30 4-6: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 5 ................................... 4-31 4-7: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 6 ................................... 4-32 4-8: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 7 ................................... 4-33 4-9: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 8 ................................... 4-34 4-10: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 9 ................................. 4-35 4-11: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 10 .............................. 4-36 4-12: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 11 .............................. 4-37 4-13: Archaeological Cultural Resources within the EIS Study Area – Map 12 .............................. 4-38 List of Tables 1-1: Alternatives Carried Forward for Further Evaluation .................................................................... 1-3 1-2: Cities with Potential Stations ....................................................................................................... 1-10 4-1: Prehistoric Archaeological Site Types by Natural Region ............................................................. 4-1 4-2: Archaeological Sites in Oklahoma—Northern Section (presented north to south and west to east) .......................................................................................................................... 4-18 4-3: Archaeological Sites in Texas—Northern Section (presented north to south and west to east) ................................................................................................................................. 4-19 4-4: Archaeological Sites—Central Section (presented north to south, and west to east) ............. 4-20 4-5: Archaeological Sites—Southern Section (Alternatives S4 and S6 presented north to south and west to east) ............................................................................................................... 4-24 5-1: Summary of Archaeological Sites by Geographic Section ............................................................ 5-1 5-2: Summary of Archaeological Sites by Alternative ........................................................................... 5-1 7-1: Summary of Potential Intensity of Effects on Archaeological Sites ............................................. 7-2 Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study July 2016 Archaeological Sites Technical Study Page iv TBG111814093418SCO Abbreviations and Acronyms APE Area of Potential Effect CFR Code of Federal Regulations
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan
    U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan April2006 United States Department of the Interior FISH AND Wll...DLIFE SERVICE P.O. Box 1306 Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 In Reply Refer To: R2/NWRS-PLN JUN 0 5 2006 Dear Reader: The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) is proud to present to you the enclosed Comprehensive Conservation Plan (CCP) for the Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge (Refuge). This CCP and its supporting documents outline a vision for the future of the Refuge and specifies how this unique area can be maintained to conserve indigenous wildlife and their habitats for the enjoyment of the public for generations to come. Active community participation is vitally important to manage the Refuge successfully. By reviewing this CCP and visiting the Refuge, you will have opportunities to learn more about its purpose and prospects. We invite you to become involved in its future. The Service would like to thank all the people who participated in the planning and public involvement process. Comments you submitted helped us prepare a better CCP for the future of this unique place. Sincerely, Tom Baca Chief, Division of Planning Hagerman National Wildlife Refuge Comprehensive Conservation Plan Sherman, Texas Prepared by: United States Fish and Wildlife Service Division of Planning Region 2 500 Gold SW Albuquerque, New Mexico 87103 Comprehensive conservation plans provide long-term guidance for management decisions and set forth goals, objectives, and strategies needed to accomplish refuge purposes and identify the Service’s best estimate of future needs. These plans detail program planning levels that are sometimes substantially above current budget allocations and, as such, are primarily for Service strategic planning and program prioritization purposes.
    [Show full text]
  • Convention Grade 7
    Texas Historical Commission Washington-on-the-Brazos A Texas Convention Grade 7 Virtual Field Trip visitwashingtononthebrazos.com Learning Guide Grade 7 Childhood in the Republic Overview: A New Beginning for Texas Texas became Mexican territory in 1821 and the new settlers brought by Stephen F. Austin and others were considered Mexican citizens. The distance between the settlements and Mexico (proper), plus the increasing number of settlers moving into the territory caused tension. The settlers had little influence in their government and limited exposure to Mexican culture. By the time of the Convention of 1836, fighting had already Image “Reading of the Texas Declaration of broken out in some areas. The causes of some of this Independence,” Courtesy of Artie Fultz Davis Estate; Artist: Charles and Fanny Norman, June 1936 fighting were listed as grievances in the Texas Declaration of Independence. Objectives • Identify the key grievances given by the people of Texas that lead to the formation of government in the independent Republic of Texas • How do they compare to the grievances of the American Revolution? • How do they relate to the Mexican complaints against Texas? • How did these grievances lead to the formation of government in the Republic? • Identify the key persons at the Convention of 1836 Social Studies TEKS 4th Grade: 4.3A, 4.13A 7th Grade: 7.1 B, 7.2 D, 7.3C Resources • Activity 1: 59 for Freedom activity resources • Activity 2: Declaration and Constitution Causes and Effects activity resources • Extension Activity: Order
    [Show full text]
  • Culture, Recreation and Tourism
    Interim Report to the 85th Texas Legislature House Committee on Culture, Recreation & Tourism January 2017 HOUSE COMMITTEE ON CULTURE, RECREATION, & TOURISM TEXAS HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES INTERIM REPORT 2016 A REPORT TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES 85TH TEXAS LEGISLATURE RYAN GUILLEN CHAIRMAN COMMITTEE CLERK BEN WRIGHT Committee On Culture, Recreation, & Tourism JanuaryJanuary 10,4, 2017 2017 Ryan Guillen P.O. Box 2910 Chairman Austin, Texas 78768-2910 The Honorable Joe Straus Speaker, Texas House of Representatives Members of the Texas House of Representatives Texas State Capitol, Rm. 2W.13 Austin, Texas 78701 Dear Mr. Speaker and Fellow Members: The Committee on Culture, Recreation, & Tourism of the Eighty-fourth Legislature hereby submits its interim report including recommendations and drafted legislation for consideration by the Eighty-fifth Legislature. Respectfully submitted, _______________________ Ryan Guillen _______________________ _______________________ Dawnna Dukes, Vice Chair John Frullo _______________________ _______________________ Lyle Larson Marisa Márquez _______________________ _______________________ Andrew Murr Wayne Smith Dawnna Dukes Vice-Chairman Members: John Frullo, Lyle Larson, Marisa Márquez, Andrew Murr, Wayne Smith TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................................... 6 CULTURE, RECREATION, & TOURISM ................................................................................... 7 Interim Charge #1 ........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Ecoregions of Texas
    Ecoregions of Texas 23 Arizona/New Mexico Mountains 26 Southwestern Tablelands 30 Edwards Plateau 23a Chihuahuan Desert Slopes 26a Canadian/Cimarron Breaks 30a Edwards Plateau Woodland 23b Montane Woodlands 26b Flat Tablelands and Valleys 30b Llano Uplift 24 Chihuahuan Deserts 26c Caprock Canyons, Badlands, and Breaks 30c Balcones Canyonlands 24a Chihuahuan Basins and Playas 26d Semiarid Canadian Breaks 30d Semiarid Edwards Plateau 24b Chihuahuan Desert Grasslands 27 Central Great Plains 31 Southern Texas Plains 24c Low Mountains and Bajadas 27h Red Prairie 31a Northern Nueces Alluvial Plains 24d Chihuahuan Montane Woodlands 27i Broken Red Plains 31b Semiarid Edwards Bajada 24e Stockton Plateau 27j Limestone Plains 31c Texas-Tamaulipan Thornscrub 25 High Plains 29 Cross Timbers 31d Rio Grande Floodplain and Terraces 25b Rolling Sand Plains 29b Eastern Cross Timbers 25e Canadian/Cimarron High Plains 29c Western Cross Timbers 25i Llano Estacado 29d Grand Prairie 25j Shinnery Sands 29e Limestone Cut Plain 25k Arid Llano Estacado 29f Carbonate Cross Timbers 25b 26a 26a 25b 25e Level III ecoregion 26d 300 60 120 mi Level IV ecoregion 26a Amarillo 27h 60 0 120 240 km County boundary 26c State boundary Albers equal area projection 27h 25i 26b 25j 27h 35g 35g 26b Wichita 29b 35a 35c Lubbock 26c Falls 33d 27i 29d Sherman 35a 25j Denton 33d 35c 32a 33f 35b 25j 26b Dallas 33f 35a 35b 27h 29f Fort 35b Worth 33a 26b Abilene 32c Tyler 29b 24c 29c 35b 23a Midland 26c 30d 35a El Paso 24a 23b Odessa 35b 24a 24b 25k 27j 33f Nacogdoches 24d Waco Pecos 25j
    [Show full text]
  • Illustrated Flora of East Texas Illustrated Flora of East Texas
    ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS ILLUSTRATED FLORA OF EAST TEXAS IS PUBLISHED WITH THE SUPPORT OF: MAJOR BENEFACTORS: DAVID GIBSON AND WILL CRENSHAW DISCOVERY FUND U.S. FISH AND WILDLIFE FOUNDATION (NATIONAL PARK SERVICE, USDA FOREST SERVICE) TEXAS PARKS AND WILDLIFE DEPARTMENT SCOTT AND STUART GENTLING BENEFACTORS: NEW DOROTHEA L. LEONHARDT FOUNDATION (ANDREA C. HARKINS) TEMPLE-INLAND FOUNDATION SUMMERLEE FOUNDATION AMON G. CARTER FOUNDATION ROBERT J. O’KENNON PEG & BEN KEITH DORA & GORDON SYLVESTER DAVID & SUE NIVENS NATIVE PLANT SOCIETY OF TEXAS DAVID & MARGARET BAMBERGER GORDON MAY & KAREN WILLIAMSON JACOB & TERESE HERSHEY FOUNDATION INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT: AUSTIN COLLEGE BOTANICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF TEXAS SID RICHARDSON CAREER DEVELOPMENT FUND OF AUSTIN COLLEGE II OTHER CONTRIBUTORS: ALLDREDGE, LINDA & JACK HOLLEMAN, W.B. PETRUS, ELAINE J. BATTERBAE, SUSAN ROBERTS HOLT, JEAN & DUNCAN PRITCHETT, MARY H. BECK, NELL HUBER, MARY MAUD PRICE, DIANE BECKELMAN, SARA HUDSON, JIM & YONIE PRUESS, WARREN W. BENDER, LYNNE HULTMARK, GORDON & SARAH ROACH, ELIZABETH M. & ALLEN BIBB, NATHAN & BETTIE HUSTON, MELIA ROEBUCK, RICK & VICKI BOSWORTH, TONY JACOBS, BONNIE & LOUIS ROGNLIE, GLORIA & ERIC BOTTONE, LAURA BURKS JAMES, ROI & DEANNA ROUSH, LUCY BROWN, LARRY E. JEFFORDS, RUSSELL M. ROWE, BRIAN BRUSER, III, MR. & MRS. HENRY JOHN, SUE & PHIL ROZELL, JIMMY BURT, HELEN W. JONES, MARY LOU SANDLIN, MIKE CAMPBELL, KATHERINE & CHARLES KAHLE, GAIL SANDLIN, MR. & MRS. WILLIAM CARR, WILLIAM R. KARGES, JOANN SATTERWHITE, BEN CLARY, KAREN KEITH, ELIZABETH & ERIC SCHOENFELD, CARL COCHRAN, JOYCE LANEY, ELEANOR W. SCHULTZE, BETTY DAHLBERG, WALTER G. LAUGHLIN, DR. JAMES E. SCHULZE, PETER & HELEN DALLAS CHAPTER-NPSOT LECHE, BEVERLY SENNHAUSER, KELLY S. DAMEWOOD, LOGAN & ELEANOR LEWIS, PATRICIA SERLING, STEVEN DAMUTH, STEVEN LIGGIO, JOE SHANNON, LEILA HOUSEMAN DAVIS, ELLEN D.
    [Show full text]
  • Weird City: Sense of Place and Creative Resistance in Austin, Texas
    Weird City: Sense of Place and Creative Resistance in Austin, Texas BY Joshua Long 2008 Submitted to the graduate degree program in Geography and the Graduate Faculty of the University of Kansas in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Human Geography __________________________________ Dr. Garth Andrew Myers, Chairperson __________________________________ Dr. Jane Gibson __________________________________ Dr. Brent Metz __________________________________ Dr. J. Christopher Brown __________________________________ Dr. Shannon O’Lear Date Defended: June 5, 2008. The Dissertation Committee for Joshua Long certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: Weird City: Sense of Place and Creative Resistance in Austin, Texas ___________________________________ Dr. Garth Andrew Myers, Chairperson Date Approved: June 10, 2008 ii Acknowledgments This page does not begin to represent the number of people who helped with this dissertation, but there are a few who must be recognized for their contributions. Red, this dissertation might have never materialized if you hadn’t answered a random email from a KU graduate student. Thank you for all your help and continuing advice. Eddie, you revealed pieces of Austin that I had only read about in books. Thank you. Betty, thank you for providing such a fair-minded perspective on city planning in Austin. It is easy to see why so many Austinites respect you. Richard, thank you for answering all my emails. Seriously, when do you sleep? Ricky, thanks for providing a great place to crash and for being a great guide. Mycha, thanks for all the insider info and for introducing me to RARE and Mean-Eyed Chris.
    [Show full text]
  • Texas Blackland Prairies ECOREGION HANDBOOK August 2012
    TEXAS CONSERVATION ACTION PLAN Texas Blackland Prairies ECOREGION HANDBOOK August 2012 Citing this document: Texas Parks and Wildlife Department. 2012. Texas Conservation Action Plan 2012 – 2016: Texas Blackland Prairies Handbook. Editor, Wendy Connally, Texas Conservation Action Plan Coordinator. Austin, Texas. Contents SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................... 1 HOW TO GET INVOLVED ............................................................................................................................... 2 OVERVIEW ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 RARE SPECIES and COMMUNITIES .............................................................................................................. 14 PRIORITY HABITATS ..................................................................................................................................... 15 ISSUES ......................................................................................................................................................... 20 CONSERVATION ACTIONS ........................................................................................................................... 32 ECOREGION HANDBOOK FIGURES Figure 1. TBPR Ecoregion with County Boundaries .....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Texas-Oklahoma Passenger Rail Study Service-Level Draft
    Appendix K Archaeological Sites Technical Study In coordination with Oklahoma DOT Archaeological Sites Technical Study Prepared by July 2016 Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms ................................................................................................................... v 1.0 Introduction .............................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Service Type Descriptions .............................................................................................. 1-4 1.1.1 Conventional Rail .......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.2 Higher-Speed Rail ......................................................................................................... 1-4 1.1.3 High-Speed Rail ............................................................................................................. 1-4 1.2 Alternative Descriptions ................................................................................................. 1-5 1.2.1 No Build Alternative ...................................................................................................... 1-5 1.2.2 Northern Section: Oklahoma City to Dallas and Fort Worth ....................................... 1-6 1.2.3 Central Section: Dallas and Fort Worth to San Antonio ............................................. 1-7 1.2.4 Southern Section: San Antonio to South Texas .........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Archeological Journal of the Texas Prairie-Savannah 2011
    Archeological Journal of the Texas Prairie Savannah 1(1) ARCHEOLOGiCAL JOURNAL OF THE TEXAS PRAIRIE-SAVANNAH AN AJ CONSULTING PUBLICATION JESSE TODD, EDITOR VOLUME 1 NUMBER 1 APRIL 15, 2011 i Archeological Journal of the Texas Prairie Savannah 1(1) EDITORIAL POLICY This journal deals with articles from Texas Prairie-Savannah Region. However, articles from adjoining counties sometimes are included because of the potential cultural influence from people inhabiting archeological sites in those counties. The time frame for articles ranges from the Prehistoric to the Historic. Articles in the journal come from vocations and avocational archeologists as well as graduate students. Articles are left as much as possible in their original form. This is more of a compilation of papers than a journal formatted to the editor’s taste. The importance is getting out archeological information. IF YOU FEEL UNCOMFORTABLE ABOUT YOUR WRITING, DON’T. We have editors! What you say is more important. With your help, this will be a journal chock full of good information. Welcome and Thanks, Jesse and Antoinette Todd ii Archeological Journal of the Texas Prairie Savannah 1(1) TABLE OF CONTENTS Editorial Policy i Table of Contents ii Introduction by Jesse Todd and Lance K. Trask. 1 A Possible Association of Worked Flakes with Probosidean Bones near Lake Lavon, Collin County, Texas by Wilson W. Crook, III. 4 The Gilkey Hill Site (41KF42/41DL406): A Large Late Prehistoric Occupation in Dallas County, Texas. by Wilson W. Crook, III. 9 Archeological Investigations at the Gilkey Hill Site (41DL406), Dallas County, Texas by Jesse Todd, S.
    [Show full text]
  • ^ Y K' a " " Wfc Yy E Ti V'
    & " Wfc yy E 41 F N y o'1' I L B I ^ Y k' a " ti v' THE TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION MEDALLI(*N SUMMER 2017 ISSN 0890-7595 Vol. 55, No. III thc.texas.gov [email protected] TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION John L. Nau, Ill Chairman John W. Crain Vice Chairman Gilbert E. "Pete" Peterson Secretary Earl Broussard, Jr. Tom Perini Monica Burdette Robert K. Shepard Wallace B. Jefferson Daisy Sloan White Catherine McKnight Mark Wolfe FXP('Icti\/P Director Medalion STAFF Chris Florance Division Director Andy Rhodes Managing Editor Judy Jensen Sr. Graphic Design Coordinator thc.texas.gov Real places telling the real stories of Texas texastimetravel.com The Texas Heritage Trails Program's travel resnurre texashistoricsites.com The THC's 21 state historic properties thcfriends.org Friends of the Texas Historical Commissinn DE rcJTube @ Fast Facts These numbers show the significant economic impact of annual travel and heritage-related spending in Texas. C Source: Economic Impact of Historic Preservation in Texas, 2015 $58.4 $2.25 54,0 BILLION IN DIRECT BILLION IN HEPITAgr TIJRISM JOBS CREATED VISITOR SPENDING VIA HERITAGE TRAVEL 2 THE MEDALLION SUMMER 2017 TEXAS HISTORICAL COMMISSION Dear Friends, Now that the 85th Texas Legislature's regular session has I'd be remiss if I didn't mention that we will also be wrapped up, I'd like to share the impact it will have on making some challenging financial-planning decisions our agency and our valuable preservation partners across due to a budget reduction imposed on all state agencies. the state. We will continue to prioritize our efforts to efficiently invest in the historic buildings and cultural landscapes The Texas Historical Commission fared well during the that have defined Texas' special sense of place for centuries.
    [Show full text]
  • The People, Economy and Political Culture of Texas Part II
    For all its enormous range of space, climate and physical appearance, and for all the internal squabbles, contentions and strivings, Texas has a tight cohesiveness perhaps stronger than any other section of America. John Steinbeck gross state product (GSP): the total value of goods and services produced in a state in a year ... often simply referred to as GDP (gross domestic product), the term for national economies In 2016, the Texas GSP was $1.62 trillion. The Texas economy has been growing at a more rapid pace than the national economy. Texas’ GSP increased by an average of 3.7% annually between 2005 and 2015, nearly three times the US annual growth rate of 1.3%. Only North Dakota had greater economic growth during this period. One of the only things holding Texas back is the education rate among its labor supply. 1999-2011 Texas is the 10th largest economy in the world based on GDP. It is also an economy in transition. For most of Texas’s history, the state’s economy was based on the sale of agricultural commodities and raw materials. In the 19th century, cotton and cattle formed the basis of economic activity, and both are still important industries today. Texas has the most farms and the highest acreage in the US. It is ranked #1 for revenue generated from total livestock and livestock products. It is ranked #2 (behind California) for total agricultural revenue. Beef cattle production represents the largest single segment of Texas agriculture (56.7%), followed by cotton (14.6%). Ever since the discovery of oil, energy has been a dominant force politically and economically in Texas.
    [Show full text]
  • Collection Plan
    Table of Contents Executive Summary .......................................................................................................................5 Introduction ....................................................................................................................................6 Natural History Collection ............................................................................................................8 Collection Overview ....................................................................................................................8 Size ....................................................................................................................................................... 8 History of Collection ............................................................................................................................ 8 Types of Material .................................................................................................................................. 9 Required Permits ................................................................................................................................. 10 Collection Guidelines .................................................................................................................10 Associated Staff ..........................................................................................................................10 Paleontology & Geology Collection ............................................................................................11
    [Show full text]