Final Revised Land and Resource Management Plan

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Final Revised Land and Resource Management Plan Unlted States Department of Agriculture Forest Sarvice Southern Region Januaty 1993 FINAL REVISED LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST Virginia West Virginia GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST THE REVISED LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN TABLE OF CONTENTS CHAPTER 1 .INTRODUCTION TO THE REVISED FOREST PIAN ........... 1-1 CHAPTER 2 .HOW THE REVISED PIAN ADDRESSES YOUR ISSUES Issue 1: Biodiversity ................................ 2.1 Issue 2. Below-Cost Timber Sales ....................... 2.12 Issue 3: Forest Access ............. ............2-17 Issue 4: All-Terrain Vehicle (ATV) Use .................... 2-20 Issue 5: Roadless Area Management ...................... 2.21 Issue 6 . Special Management Areas ..... ................2-23 Issue 7: Aesthetics ................................ 2-25 Issue 8 Vegetation Manipulation .... ................2-27 Issue 9. Resource Sustainability ....................... 2.30 Issue 10: Minerals ........ ........ ............2.33 Issue 11’ Gypsy Moth ...... ........ .......... 2-35 Issue 12: Adequacy of the Revision ...................2-37 Issue 13: The Mix of Goods and Services ..... ......... 2-38 CHAPTER 3 .MANAGEMENT OF THE FOREST Under the Preferred Alternative Introduction .................................... 3-1 AnOvelview ..................................... 3-1 Management Area 4 Special Interest Areas Research Natural Areas .............. 3-4 Management Area 5: Massanutten Mountain Sensitive Viewshed ....3.1 9 Management Area 6: The Appalachian Trail ................ 3-22 Management Area 7: Scenic Corridors and the Highlands Scenic Tour ........... 3-29 Management Area 8 Wildernessr/VildernessStudy .............3-35 Management Area 9: Remote Highlands ...................3.43 Management Area IO: Scenic Rivers & Recreational Rivers ........346 Management Area 11 . All-Terrain/Off-Highway Vehicle Routes ......3.54 Management Area 12. Developed Recreation ................3.61 Management Area 13: Dispersed Recreation Areas .............3.69 Management Area 14: Remote Habitat for Wildlife .............3.74 Management Area 15. Mosaics of Wildlife Habitat .............. 3-79 Management Area 16Early Successional Forested Habitats ....3.84 Management Area 17. Timber Production ...... ..... 3-88 Management Area 18 Riparian Areas (Streams and Shorelines) .3-92 Management Area 20 Administrative Sites, Utilty Corridors & Communications Sltes ....... ... .3-101 Management Area 21 : Special Management Areas ... .... 3-107 Management Area 22 HabltatSmall Gamewatchable Wildlife .3-117 Common Standards Aesthetics ............ ....... ....3-119 Air ...... ............. ...... .3-121 Caves .... ............. ....... .... .3-122 Cultural Resources ........ ...... .3-123 Fire ......... ................ 3-127 Grazing ....... ......... ....... .3-130 Integrated Pest Management ..... ..... .3-130 Law Enforcement ....... ........ .....3-139 Minerals ....... ...... ..... 3-140 Recreation. ....... ....... .3-141 Roads ......... ........ ..... .3-143 Soil and Water , I ...... ..... .3-143 Special Uses and Access Easements . ...... 3-149 Threatened, Endangered, and Sensltive Species . , , . 3-149 Timber ........ ...... ...... .3-150 Vegetation ....... ...... ...... .....3-I 57 Weeds ........................................ 3-157 Wildlife ....... ........ .... ,3-157 CHAPTER 4 - IMPLEMENTATION OF THE REVISED FOREST PLAN . .4-1 CHAPTER 5 - MONITORING AND EVALUATION .... ..... .....5-1 APPENDIX A - TIMBER SALE SCHEDULEFOTAL TIMBER SALE PROGRAM/ LANDS SUITABLE FOR TIMBER PRODUCTION ... .... A-1 APPENDIX B - LIST OF PROJECTS ........ ....... ....... B-1 APPENDIX C - INTERPRETATION PLAN ..... ...... .... c-1 APPENDIX D - EVALUATION OF CAVES ....... ....... ..... D-1 APPENDIX E - LANDS MANAGEMENT ...... ...... .... E-1 APPENDIX F - PROGRAM BUDGET DEVELOPMENT ..... .... F-1 APPENDIX G - ROAD STANDARDS ............. ...... .G-1 APPENDIX H - VEGETATION MANAGEMENT . ....... ..... H-1 APPENDIX I - ADOPTION OF RECREATION OPPORTUNITY SPECTRUM CLASSES AND VISUAL QUALITY OBJECTIVES ..... ....... 1-1 APPENDIX J - ADDITIONAL FOUR-WHEEL DRIVE ROADS ... ..... J-1 APPENDIX K - DEFINITION OF RIPARIAN AREA MANAGEMENT .... K-1 APPENDIX L - THREATENED, ENDANGERED, AND SENSITIVE (r€S) SPECIES ON THE FOREST ....... ...... ..... L-1 INTRODUCTION TO THE REVISED FOREST PLAN PURPOSE This Revised National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan: - Establishes natural resource management direction for the George Wash- ington National Forest (the Forest) for the next 10 to 15 years Forest multiple use goals and objectives are contained in Chapter 2 Forest standards are listed under 'Common Standards' in Chapter 3 - Explains, issue-by-issue, how the Revised Plan responds to issues that evolved from concerns of the public, concerns of other agencies, and concerns of Forest staff - Chapter 2. - Summarizes the management sltuation in terms of the existing resource conditions and the potentialfor resource development including the anticipated demand for goods and sewices from the Forest - Chapter 2 - Allocates twenty-four roadless areas to management areas which permit a range of uses - Chapter 2 and the management area map for Alternative 8A. - Speclfies what we would like the Forest to be -- physically, biologically -- as we work toward resolution of the issues Chapter 3 presents each management area and the standards that apply. This chapter includes oblectives designed to move the Forest toward Its desired future condition. - Determines what lands are available for leasable mineral development based on the objectives and desired future condition of dfferent management areas - Management Area Standards in Chapter 3. - Speclfies how the Revised Plan will be put into practice - Implementation in Chapter 4. Speclfies time-tables for reviewingthe Revised Plan, for updating It, for amending or revising It - Chapter 4. - Establishes a qualty control system that determines how well direction in the Revised Plan is carried out and determines the accuracy of outputs and effects projected in the Revised Plan - Monitoring and Evaluation in Chapter 5. - Identifies land that is sultable for timber production - Appendix A The National Forest Management Act requires that 'scheduled timber sales' using 1-1 Introduction to the Revised Plan even-aged and uneven-aged regeneration hawest methods be limited to lands that are classtied as sutable for timber production. - Establishes the Allowable Sale Quantrty (ASQ) and the Timber Sale Sched- ule - Appendix A The allowable sale quantity is the most timber volume that can be hawested during any decade on lands that are classtied as suitable for timber production The National Forest Management Act, the Code of Federal Regulations, and other guiding documents determined the content of this Revised Plan. Land allocations and standards set forth here constfiute the management direction the Forest will follow. The projected levels of forest products and services offered, however, and the associated time-frames are dependent on the amount of the budget allocated to the Forest annually. RELATIONSHIP This Revised Plan is a detailed description of the Forest Sewice preferred TO EIS alternative The procedures used in developing the Revised Plan and in analyz- ing all alternatives are described or referenced in the accompanying Environ- mental lmpact Statement (EIS). The Revised Plan incorporates management direction from four other environ- mental impact statements. 0 FinalEnvironmentallmpact Statement for Suppression of SouthernPine Beetle (USDA Forest Sewice - Southern Region, April 1987) 0 Final Environmental lmpact Statement as Supplemented [in] 7985 - USDA Gypsy Moth Suppression and Eradication Propcts (1 985); 0 FinalEnvironmental lmpact Statement-Appalachian lntegratedPest Manage- ment (AIPM) - Gypsy Moth Demonstration Project (1 989); 0 Final Environmentallmpact Statement - Vegetation Management in the Ap- palachian Mountains [USDA Forest Sewice - Southern Region, July 19891. The Revised Plan provides general, program-level direction for projects and activities on the six ranger districts of the Forest All must meet certain legal requirements that are discussed in Chapter 4 of this document. Introduction to the Revised Plan 1-2 FOREST The George Washington National Forest extends for 140 miles along the INFORMATION Appalachian Mountains of northwestern Virginia and adlacent West Virginia. The Forest includes approximately 956,000 acres of National Forest System Location land in 13 Virginia counties and approximately 105,000 acres in four counties in West Virginia -- a total of 1,061,000 acres. GEORGE WASHINGTON NATIONAL FOREST 1-3 Introduction to the Revised Plan Structure The Forest is divided into six ranger districts: the James River, Warm Springs, Pedlar, Deerfield, Diy River, and Lee ranger districts The Forest Supervisor’s Office is in downtown Harrisonburg, Virginia The Forest Management Team includes the Forest Supervisor, eight staff officers, and six district rangers. George Washington National Forest ADDITIONAL Supporting information is incorporated-by-referencein this document and in INFORMATION the accompanying Environmental Impact Statement. The information that AVAILABLE is incorporated-by-referenceis available for review at the Supervisor’s Office in Harrison Plaza, 101 North Main Street, Harrisonburg, Virginia The phone num- ber is (703)433-2491. Introduction to the Revised Plan 1-4 CHAPTER 2 HOW THE REVISED PUNADDRESSES YOUR ISSUES INTRODUCTION This chapter describes how
Recommended publications
  • Ultrarunning World Magazine Day! Great to Hear from Gary Dudney
    ROAD, TRACK & TRAIL MULTIDAY & ULTRA DISTANCE NEWS // ISSUE 31 30 / 2021 | Ultrarunning World 1 2 Ultrarunning World | 30 / 2021 Editorial e are happy to welcome new members to the team with Sarah Thi helping on the editorial side. Dan Walker has sent Wus several articles and we are grateful for his interesting and helpful insights drawn from the depths of his ultrarunning experience. Gareth Chadwick has been working on material for our next publication which will be a Special Edition on the Dartmoor Discovery. We are grateful to Emily Adams who has been reviewing books for us. As the covid situation abates Emily is focussing more on her work as a physiotherapist and on her own running, she is leaving us with a review of Lowri Morgan’s latest book Beyond Limits. Another member of our correspondent team, Leila Majewska, (now Thompson) has set up Tough Trails with her husband Mike and we are very happy to support them and their vision to bring new and challenging events to the Peak District and beyond. Their first event will be the INFERNO – Edale’s Ring of Hell Ultra, Half Marathon & 10k We have also crossed paths with Blended Trails, a running community specialising in pop up trail routes in the countryside based in Medstead, Hampshire. Founded by Ollie Steele-Perkins in the Spring of 2020, the community is growing from strength to strength and will be holding Ultrarunning World their first event, the Hattingley Half on July 24th 2021 and later this year April 2021 they are planning on an ultra and we look forward to hearing about what goes down in Medstead.
    [Show full text]
  • Signal Knob Northern Massanutten Mountain Catback Mountain Browns Run Southern Massanutten Mountain Five Areas of Around 45,000 Acres on the Lee the West
    Sherman Bamford To: [email protected] <[email protected] cc: Sherman Bamford <[email protected]> > Subject: NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage draft multi-species habitat conservation plan comments - attachments 2 12/13/2011 03:32 PM Sherman Bamford Forests Committee Chair Virginia Chapter – Sierra Club P.O. Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015 [email protected] (540) 343-6359 December 13, 2011 Regional Director, Midwest Region Attn: Lisa Mandell U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Ecological Services 5600 American Blvd. West, Suite 990 Bloomington, MN 55437-1458 Email: [email protected] Dear Ms. Mandell: On behalf of the Virginia Chapter of Sierra Club, the following are attachments to our previously submitted comments on the the NiSource Gas Transmission and Storage (“NiSource”) draft multi-species habitat conservation plan (“HCP”) and the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service (“Service”) draft environmental impact statement (“EIS”). Draft of Virginia Mountain Treasures For descriptions and maps only. The final version was published in 2008. Some content may have changed between 2007 and 2008. Sherman Bamford Sherman Bamford PO Box 3102 Roanoke, Va. 24015-1102 (540) 343-6359 [email protected] Virginia’s Mountain Treasures ART WORK DRAWING The Unprotected Wildlands of the George Washington National Forest A report by the Wilderness Society Cover Art: First Printing: Copyright by The Wilderness Society 1615 M Street, NW Washington, DC 20036 (202)-843-9453 Wilderness Support Center 835 East Second Avenue Durango, CO 81302 (970) 247-8788 Founded in 1935, The Wilderness Society works to protect America’s wilderness and to develop a nation- wide network of wild lands through public education, scientific analysis, and advocacy.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Area Ultra Runner List
    Baltimore Area Ultra Runner List The purpose of the Baltimore Area Ultra Runner (BAUR) List is to identify those individuals in the Baltimore Running Community that have completed running events greater than the traditional marathon distance (26.2 miles) and highlight their accomplishments. The BAUR List started in January 2010 and it is similar to a document compiled by the RASAC Running Club in Harford County, Maryland that focuses on members of their club. It is hoped that this list will identify those pioneers of distance running in the Baltimore Region and encourage others to participate in our sport. In 2014 the BAUR list expanded its geographic area to include runners in Central Maryland that asked to be included on this list. Criteria for inclusion into the Baltimore Area Ultra Runner List: 1. You must have finished at least 1 ultra race. This is any organized distance event greater than 26.2 miles in length. 2. Training runs do not count. 3. A- You must finish the race. You cannot dropout of a race and still have it count toward the list. B- However, if a race provides official credit for a partial distance covered in their official results as a separate event, this will be considered an official ultra finish. (i.e. Runners in the Umstead 100 Miler, completing at least 50 miles, are included in the Umstead 50 Mile Results) 4. Ranking is by total mileage completed. 5. Time and place in the running events are not considered. 6. Eligibility is not limited to Baltimore Road Runners Club members and BRRC membership is not required.
    [Show full text]
  • Management Areas
    MANA(~EMENT Management areas are "areas of the Forest with similar managerlnent objec- AR:EAS tives where compatible misnagement prescriptions1 are applield." The Re- vised Plan is based on a sysrem where lands managed to achieve complemen- tary objectives under the same standards2 are allocated to the same manage- ment area. Twenty-two maflagement areas were developed to ac(;ommodate the variety of desired manag ement activities, products, services, and conditions identified by the public. Eac h of the 14 alternatives considered in 'Ijet ail in the Final Environmental Impact Statement (FE IS) used a different combination of these management areas in achieving a distinct forest management theme. Appendix B of the FEIS comains a discussion of the 22 different management areas used in formulating th4~14 alternatives. The Revised Plan --a detailed and expanded version of the pr4~ferred alternative --utilizes 18 of the 22 manage- ment areas. Each of the 18 management areas is described in detail in the pages following, beginning with acres per management area in Table 3-1. Table ~S-1.Manaaement Area Acreaae bv Thousands of Acres ManagementArea Per Man~lgem4~nt PI~rcent of Unsuitable Suitable Arl~a Forest Acres' Acres' 4 ~)peciallnterest/Research Natural Areas 70 7% 70 5 Sensitive Viewsheds 10 1% 10 6 The Appalachian Trail ~I 1% 9 7 Scenic Corridors/Highland Scenic Tour 39 3% 27 12 8 Wildernessf'Nilderness Study 44 4% 44 9 Remote Highlands 141 13% 141 10 Scenic/Recreational Rivers B .8% 8 11 All-Terrain/Off Highway Routes 11 1% 8 3 12 Developed Recreation Areas 2 .2% 2 13 Dispersed Recreation Areas 42 4% 38 4 14 Remote Habitat for Wildlife 133 13% 85 48 15 Mosaics of Wildlife Habitat with Freedom from Continued Disturbance 331 31% 139 192 16 Early Successional Forested Habitat for Wildlife 39 3% 12 27 17 Timber Emphasis 91 9% 28 63 18 Riparian Areas with Ecological Widths 21 ~,b 20 1 20 Administrative Sites, Utility Corridors, and Communication Sites 4 .4% 4 21 Special Mgt.
    [Show full text]
  • Virginia & the Blue Ridge
    COMPLIMENTARY $2.95 2017/2018 YOUR COMPLETE GUIDE TO THE PARKS VIRGINIA & THE BLUE RIDGE ACTIVITIES • SIGHTSEEING • PRESERVATION EVENTS • TRAILS • HISTORY • MAPS • MORE OFFICIAL PARTNERS This summer, Yamaha launches a new Star motorcycle designed to help you journey further…than you ever thought possible. To see the road ahead, visit YamahaMotorsports.com/Journey-Further Some motorcycles shown with custom parts, accessories, paint and bodywork. Dress properly for your ride with a helmet, eye protection, long sleeves, long pants, gloves and boots. Yamaha and the Motorcycle Safety Foundation encourage you to ride safely and respect the environment. For further information regarding the MSF course, please call 1-800-446-9227. Do not drink and ride. It is illegal and dangerous. ©2017 Yamaha Motor Corporation, U.S.A. All rights reserved. WHO’S WHO AT THE PARK WELCOME The Blue Ridge Parkway, often Today, the Blue Ridge Parkway called “America’s Favorite Drive,” is one of the most visited is set against the spectacular national park units, with an Blue Ridge Mountains—so average of 16 million visits named for the bluish tint that a year! Commercial and resi- the mountains put off from a dential development, air and mixture of sunlight, forest and water quality issues, and lack fog. Construction commenced in of sufficient funding, however, 1935, in part, to connect Shenan- all threaten this valuable and doah National Park in Virginia with vulnerable corridor. In collaboration Great Smoky Mountains National Park with the National Park Service and several in North Carolina and Tennessee. Originally organizations, including land trust groups called the ‘Appalachian Scenic Highway,’ it from all states on the route, thousands was envisioned as the first elongated national are working diligently to ensure the park is park, providing the recently enamored auto- protected.
    [Show full text]
  • Greenway Plan
    The Central Shenandoah Valley Greenway Plan An Inventory and Natural Resource Assessment of the Central Shenandoah Region July 2004 The Central Shenandoah Valley Greenway Plan An Inventory and Natural Resource Assessment of the Central Shenandoah Region Covering: Augusta, Bath, Bridgewater, Broadway, Buena Vista, Craigsville, Dayton, Elkton, Glasgow, Goshen, Grottoes, Harrisonburg, Highland, Lexington, Monterey, Mount Crawford, Rockbridge, Rockingham, Staunton, Timberville and Waynesboro _________________________ Prepared by the Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission 112 MacTanly Place Staunton, VA 24401 July, 2004 The preparation of this plan was financed in part through a planning grant from the Virginia Department of Transportation’s Rural Transportation Planning Grant Program. The Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission is very thankful for the assistance of many people and organizations that contributed to and provided information for this document. They include: The Central Shenandoah Valley Greenway Committee Bill Blatter, City of Lexington Bill Kramer, Rockbridge Area Recreation Jean Clark, Lexington/Rockbridge Area Organization Tourism Development Roberta Lambert, Highland County Ronnie Coffey, Buena Vista Parks & Recreation Kyle O’Brien, Town of Broadway Sam Crickenberger, Rockbridge County Carolyn Pohowsky, Highland County Tim Crider, Town of Grottoes Chamber of Commerce George Dowrey, Town of Broadway John Sandridge, VDOT Paul Dressler, Bath County Jim Shaw, City of Waynesboro Brian Haluska, City of Waynesboro Tracey Shiflett, City of Buena Vista Drew Havens, Town of Glasgow Ron Sites, Augusta County Parks & Recreation Rhonda Henderson, Rockingham County Mike Solomon, Appalachian Trail Club Lee Hersch, City of Staunton Dave Soper, Milepost Zero Bob Holton, Town of Bridgewater Nancy Sorrells, Augusta County Hadley Jenner, Rockingham County Stacy Turner, City of Harrisonburg Organizations: Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation Upper Valley Regional Park Authority Friends of Blacks Run Virginia Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Citizens Task Force on National Forest Management 2428 Guilford Avenue Roanoke Virginia 24015
    Citizens Task Force on National Forest Management 2428 Guilford Avenue Roanoke Virginia 24015 March 11, 2010 Maureen Hyzer, Supervisor George Washington & Jefferson National Forests 5162 Valleypointe Parkway Roanoke, VA 24019 Re: COMMENTS ON GWNF DRAFT ISSUES Dear Forest Supervisor Hyzer: The Citizens Task Force on National Forest Management has the following preliminary comments responding to the Notice of Intent to revise the George Washington National Forest Land and Resource Management Plan which appeared in the Federal Register on March 10, 2010. We will provide more detailed comments later, but we believe it is important to bring to your attention at an early date some serious deficiency with the process you are following in revising the GWNF plan. As we note below, the appropriate remedy at this time is to withdraw the March 10 NOI and reissued it to focus only on scoping for public issues and give the dates for public meeting. The NOI says we should comment on documents that are contained on the GWNF web site. A cursory count shows 37 new documents for the public to review, plus scores of old documents---the exact number is irrelevant. Documents such as the draft plan components/proposed actions, alternatives, need for change/analysis of management situation, climate change discussion, and potential wilderness/roadless area evaluations should be reviewed by the public in the draft EIS/plan stage, after analysis has been conducted under the planning process set up under the 1982 regulations. The purpose of a NOI is to begin the scoping process for the public and to notice the public about scoping meetings.
    [Show full text]
  • Baltimore Area Ultra Runner List
    Baltimore Area Ultra Runner List The purpose of the Baltimore Area Ultra Runner (BAUR) List is to identify those individuals in the Baltimore Running Community that have completed running events greater than the traditional marathon distance (26.2 miles) and highlight their accomplishments. The BAUR List started in January 2010 and it is similar to a document compiled by the RASAC Running Club in Harford County, Maryland that focuses on members of their club. It is hoped that this list will identify those pioneers of distance running in the Baltimore Region and encourage others to participate in our sport. In 2014 the BAUR list expanded its geographic area to include runners in Central Maryland that asked to be included on this list. Criteria for inclusion into the Baltimore Area Ultra Runner List: 1. You must have finished at least 1 ultra race. This is any organized distance event greater than 26.2 miles in length. 2. Training runs do not count. 3. A- You must finish the race. You cannot dropout of a race and still have it count toward the list. B- However, if a race provides official credit for a partial distance covered in their official results as a separate event, this will be considered an official ultra finish. (i.e. Runners in the Umstead 100 Miler, completing at least 50 miles, are included in the Umstead 50 Mile Results) 4. Ranking is by total mileage completed. 5. Time and place in the running events are not considered. 6. Eligibility is not limited to Baltimore Road Runners Club members and BRRC membership is not required.
    [Show full text]
  • Places to Go for Photos
    Natural Places to Go for Photos LATE WINTER, EARLY SPRING Magnolia Gardens, Charleton, S.C. The garden swings into Spring around January 15th, with the first of thousands of daffodils and the dramatic bloom of the Flowering- Apricot. These heralds of Spring complement the already-blooming Camellias. Together, the excitement and anticipation of early Spring make January and February excellent months to visit. From mid-February to mid-March, the Garden is a riot of floral magnificence, with thousands of daffodils, flowering cherry and peach trees, and early- blooming Magnolias. Flowering shrubs, from quince to spirea, enliven the landscape. The azaleas usually peak in the latter half of March through the first half of April. APRIL/MAY Goshen Pass on Maury River, along scenic route 39 north and west of Lexington. Beautiful river with lots of trails in the area. Also good kayaking and fly fishing. Good in spring with “abundant” rhodo and native azalea; good in fall as well, with plenty of red maple and spicebush. Greenbrier River/Little Pigeon River in Smokies, from mid-April to end of May (See detailed Smokies list at end.) Just a mile or so into trail yields great photo opps. (400+ miles) Stillhouse Creek Road, off Plank Road east of Batesville: apple orchard that should be great when trees are in bloom. Pocosin Hollow Trail, at mile-marker 59.7 on Skyline Drive. Trail volunteers said that the trillium are fantastic in late April and the pink lady slippers are great in early May. Just across the stream there’s a large patch of slippers that shouldn’t be missed.
    [Show full text]
  • The Central Shenandoah Valley Greenway Plan
    The Central Shenandoah Valley Greenway Plan An Inventory and Natural Resource Assessment of the Central Shenandoah Region July 2004 The Central Shenandoah Valley Greenway Plan An Inventory and Natural Resource Assessment of the Central Shenandoah Region Covering: Augusta, Bath, Bridgewater, Broadway, Buena Vista, Craigsville, Dayton, Elkton, Glasgow, Goshen, Grottoes, Harrisonburg, Highland, Lexington, Monterey, Mount Crawford, Rockbridge, Rockingham, Staunton, Timberville and Waynesboro _________________________ Prepared by the Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission 112 MacTanly Place Staunton, VA 24401 July, 2004 The preparation of this plan was financed in part through a planning grant from the Virginia Department of Transportation’s Rural Transportation Planning Grant Program. The Central Shenandoah Planning District Commission is very thankful for the assistance of many people and organizations that contributed to and provided information for this document. They include: The Central Shenandoah Valley Greenway Committee Bill Blatter, City of Lexington Bill Kramer, Rockbridge Area Recreation Jean Clark, Lexington/Rockbridge Area Organization Tourism Development Roberta Lambert, Highland County Ronnie Coffey, Buena Vista Parks & Recreation Kyle O’Brien, Town of Broadway Sam Crickenberger, Rockbridge County Carolyn Pohowsky, Highland County Tim Crider, Town of Grottoes Chamber of Commerce George Dowrey, Town of Broadway John Sandridge, VDOT Paul Dressler, Bath County Jim Shaw, City of Waynesboro Brian Haluska, City of Waynesboro Tracey Shiflett, City of Buena Vista Drew Havens, Town of Glasgow Ron Sites, Augusta County Parks & Recreation Rhonda Henderson, Rockingham County Mike Solomon, Appalachian Trail Club Lee Hersch, City of Staunton Dave Soper, Milepost Zero Bob Holton, Town of Bridgewater Nancy Sorrells, Augusta County Hadley Jenner, Rockingham County Stacy Turner, City of Harrisonburg Organizations: Shenandoah Valley Battlefields Foundation Upper Valley Regional Park Authority Friends of Blacks Run Virginia Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • George Washington National Forest Hikes
    George Washington National Forest Hikes Hike 6: Big Schloss Length Difficulty Streams Views Solitude Camping 4.1 miles 2 stars N/A 5 stars 2 stars 4 stars Hike time: Approximately 4 hours depending on speed and stopping time Elevation Gain: 1,035 feet Hike Description: According to Hiking Upward (www.hikingupwawrd.com), Big Schloss is a relatively easy at only 4.4 miles and 1,000 vertical feet, it's the sister hike to Tibbet Knob which heads to the south from the same parking location. Leave the Wolf Gap Campground (near campsite #9) and start up the orange blazed Mill Mountain Trail to begin the steepest portion of the hike. The first mile has several switch backs before arriving at the ridge line of Mill Mountain. Once getting to the ridge line, turn left and continue following the now narrower trail as it follows the ridge before arriving at the junction of the Big Schloss Trail in 1.9 miles. Turn right onto the white blazed Big Schloss Trail for another 0.3 miles before crossing a wooden bridge that will take you to the overlook just 50 yards further along. Enjoy the view it's one of the best! To return, just retrace your route back to the Wolf gap Campground. Driving Directions: Follow 81 north to exit 279 –turn left on SR 675 follow to Columbia Furnace. After crossing Stony Creek immediately turn left to stay on SR 675. At the junction with SR 717 (3.1 miles from Columbia Furnace) bear right staying on SR 675.
    [Show full text]