DOCSLIB.ORG

At Home in the World: Bridging the Gap Between Internationalization and Multicultural Education

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
At Home in the World: Bridging the Gap Between Internationalization and Multicultural Education Global Learning for All: The Fourth in a Series of Working Papers on Internationalizing Higher Education in the United States At Home in the World: Bridging the Gap Between Internationalization and Multicultural Education by Christa L. Olson, Rhodri Evans, and Robert F. Shoenberg Funded by the Ford Foundation AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION The Unifying Voice for Higher Education Global Learning for All: The Fourth in a Series of Working Papers on Internationalizing Higher Education in the United States At Home in the World: Bridging the Gap Between Internationalization and Multicultural Education by Christa L. Olson, Rhodri Evans, and Robert F. Shoenberg Funded by the Ford Foundation AMERICAN COUNCIL ON EDUCATION The Unifying Voice for Higher Education © June 2007 American Council on Education ACE and the American Council on Education are registered marks of the American Council on Education. American Council on Education One Dupont Circle NW Washington, DC 20036 All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Additional copies of this publication are available for purchase at www.acenet.edu/bookstore for $20.00 per copy, plus shipping and handling. Copies also may be purchased by contacting: ACE Fulfillment Service Department 191 Washington, DC 20055-0191 Phone: (301) 632-6757 Fax: (301) 843-0159 www.acenet.edu When ordering, please specify Item #311578. Table of Contents Foreword .................................................. iii Executive Summary ........................................... v Introduction ................................................ vii Our Choice of Language . viii Our Point of View . x Part One: Why Engage in This Work? .............................. 1 To Better Understand the Changing World Order . 1 To Equip a More Diverse Group of Students with International Skills and Knowledge . 3 To Improve Instruction and Advance Student Learning . 5 To Address Difficult Social Issues in the Institutional Context . 5 Part Two: Common Ground ..................................... 7 Shared Values, Shared Challenges . 7 Shared Nature of the Work . 8 Shared Learning Outcomes . 9 Part Three: Degrees of Separation ............................... 17 Diverging Histories . 17 Diverging Structures—Academic Units/Student Services . 19 Diverging Objectives or Motivations of Faculty and Students . 20 Potential Flashpoints . 21 Part Four: Bridging the Gap .................................... 27 Beginning a Conversation . 27 Engaging in Difficult Conversations. 30 Sustaining the Conversation. 31 Curricular Frameworks. 32 Part Five: Conclusion—What’s Next? Continuing the Dialogue ........... 33 Appendices Appendix A: Roundtable Attendees . 35 Appendix B: Roundtable Agenda. 37 References ................................................. 41 Foreword n 2003, with financial support from As part of a follow-up grant to evalu- the Ford Foundation, ACE launched ate the impact of the Global Learning for a national project to promote global All project at the participating institutions, learning at eight institutions that the Ford Foundation provided funding Iserve high numbers of minority, adult, for ACE to explore further the common and part-time students.1 During the course ground between internationalization and of the Global Learning for All project, it multicultural education. To accomplish this became apparent that campuses are host goal, ACE convened a two-day roundtable to multiple perspectives on what the terms in July 2006 that brought together leading internationalization and multicultural theorists and campus practitioners of inter- education mean. At some institutions, nationalization and multicultural education differences in philosophy among faculty (that is, faculty, chief diversity officers, and staff about how internationalization and chief international educators who and multicultural education should be are responsible for advancing multicul- defined and advanced resulted in tensions tural education and internationalization), that stymied efforts to promote either as well as presidents and chief academic initiative. While some saw the possibili- officers.2 (For a complete list of the ACE ties for synergy and mutual reinforcement roundtable participants, see Appendix A.) of internationalization and multicultural The agenda for the roundtable was education, others perceived that these shaped in part by an anonymous elec- two important educational concerns tronic survey disseminated prior to the differed on a conceptual level and, on meeting through various ACE networks. a practical level, that they competed for The survey sought input from campus attention and resources. The complex rela- practitioners of internationalization and tionship between internationalization and multicultural education on areas of multicultural education, and how institu- potential synergy, examples of successful tions attempt to institutionalize both cooperation, and perceived tensions and these concepts, have implications across potential barriers to greater collaboration all institutions. between internationalization and multicultural education. 1 California State University, Stanislaus; Cleveland State University (OH); College of Notre Dame of Maryland; Kennesaw State University (GA); Montgomery College (MD); Portland State University (OR); San Diego Community College District (CA); and St. Louis Community College at Forest Park (MO). 2 The views expressed in this essay do not necessarily reflect those of the roundtable participants. American Council on Education i i i The purpose of the meeting was to when exploring the overlap of these explore the conceptual frameworks under- two concepts, and possible strategies for lying internationalization and multicultural success. (For the full agenda of the ACE education and the relationship between roundtable, see Appendix B.) these two frameworks. The roundtable This essay builds on the roundtable sought to identify the convergent and meeting and draws upon ACE’s prior divergent goals of internationalization research and project experiences, particu- and multicultural education, issues that larly in the area of institutional transforma- institutional leaders should consider tional change. i v AT HOME IN THE WORLD Executive Summary his publication, the fourth in the tionalization and multicultural education Global Learning for All series, is share some common goals and charac- intended for institutional lead- teristics, such as enhancing cross-cultural ers, chief international educa- communication, there is disagreement tionT administrators, and chief diversity over how closely they can and should be officers, as well as faculty and staff across integrated and, if so, how. the institution who are engaged in educat- This essay contends that visible lead- ing about difference. It seeks to help ership and collaborative strategies that institutions launch conversations about transcend the historical divide between the overlap between internationalization internationalization and multicultural and multicultural education. After present- education are needed to ensure that ing diverse rationales for engaging in this students can live ethical, meaningful, and important work, this essay outlines the productive lives in an increasingly diverse common ground these areas share, the and complex world. While recognizing ways in which these areas diverge, and the differing views on this issue, this essay potential strategies for advancing conver- is built on the premise that multicultural sations that bridge the gap. education and internationalization can Available research does not provide complement and enhance each other. It is a consensus on what is meant by these not intended as an exhaustive account of concepts, beyond a general recognition internationalization or multicultural educa- that, in the U.S. context at least, multi- tion and the theories, conceptual frame- cultural education focuses largely on works, and paradigms that each embrace. domestic diversity, while internationaliza- Nor does this essay seek to provide defini- tion focuses on knowledge of cultures tive answers on matters of curriculum outside the United States, on relationships design or delivery. Instead, it aims to between nation-states, and on global be suggestive, highlighting possible trends and systems. Furthermore, although questions for discussion and areas for there is general acceptance that interna- further investigation. American Council on Education v Part one of this essay elaborates on underscores the need for strong institu- why institutional leaders need to engage tional leadership if a campus is to succeed their institutions in this important work, in achieving institutional change and including the changing world order as well student learning. Part three discusses how as changing national and student demo- the diverging histories, structures, motiva- graphics. Part two outlines the common tions, and limited knowledge of each area ground that these areas share, including help explain why so many thoughtful values, interdisciplinarity, pedagogy, and people in U.S. institutions are not already several learning outcomes. These areas engaged in a dialogue across these areas. also share challenges in how they are Potential flashpoints that may develop defined and because of their marginal during
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Introduction Multicultural Education Means Different Things to Different
    Introduction Multicultural education means different things to different people. However, the differences are not as great, confusing, or contradictory as some critics and analysts claim. Many of these differences are more semantic than substantive, a reflection of the developmental level in the field and the disciplinary orientation of advocates. One should expect people who have been involved in a discipline or educational movement for a long time to understand and talk about it differently from those who are new to it. Similarly, educators who look at schooling from the vantage point of sociology, psychology, or economics will have differing views of the key concerns of schooling. Yet, these disparate analysts may agree on which issues are the most critical ones. Such differences over means coupled with widespread agreement on substance are naturally found in discussions of multicultural education. But this diversity should not be a problem, especially when we consider that multicultural education is all about plurality. The field includes educational scholars, researchers, and practitioners from a wide variety of personal, professional, philosophical, political, and pedagogical backgrounds. Therefore, we should expect that they will use different points of reference in discussing ethnic diversity and cultural pluralism. Yet, when allowances are made for these differences, a consensus on the substantive components of multicultural education quickly emerges. Such agreement is evident in areas such as the key content dimensions, value priorities, the justification for multicultural education, and its expected outcomes. Only when these fundamentals are articulated do variations emerge. Some advocates talk about expected outcomes, while others consider the major determining factor to be the group being studied; the arena of school action is the primary focus for one set of advocates, and still others are most concerned with distinctions between theory and practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Mapping Multicultural Education
    Mapping Multicultural Education The Harvard community has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters Citation Levinson, Meira. 2010. Mapping Multicultural Education. In The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, ed. Harvey Siegel, 428-450. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press. Citable link http://nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:10860786 Terms of Use This article was downloaded from Harvard University’s DASH repository, and is made available under the terms and conditions applicable to Other Posted Material, as set forth at http:// nrs.harvard.edu/urn-3:HUL.InstRepos:dash.current.terms-of- use#LAA Mapping Multicultural Education Meira Levinson Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Education, ed. by Harvey Siegel.. Multicultural education is a conceptual mess. It stands in for people’s political aspirations, but has no independent meaning or value—despite its advocates’ pretences (and beliefs) to the contrary. This is not to say that the various meanings and values attached to multicultural education by its various proponents are themselves worthless; to the contrary, they are often both plausible and compelling. But these meanings and values neither derive from nor are clarified by the concept of “multicultural education” itself. Furthermore, “multicultural education” is saddled with so many different conceptions that it is inevitably self-contradictory both in theory and in practice; even in its most well-intentioned, assiduous, and effective implementation, it cannot simultaneously achieve all of the goals it is called upon to serve. Thus, I shall argue in this chapter, “multicultural education” has no independent identity or value beyond the various goals, practices, or content to which others attach it, and to know that an education is called “multicultural” is to know little if anything about its form, content, or aims.
    [Show full text]
  • Culturally Responsive Multicultural Education Mayra Ortiz St
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by Fisher Digital Publications St. John Fisher College Fisher Digital Publications Education Masters Ralph C. Wilson, Jr. School of Education 8-2012 Culturally Responsive Multicultural Education Mayra Ortiz St. John Fisher College How has open access to Fisher Digital Publications benefited you? Follow this and additional works at: http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/education_ETD_masters Part of the Education Commons Recommended Citation Ortiz, Mayra, "Culturally Responsive Multicultural Education" (2012). Education Masters. Paper 289. Please note that the Recommended Citation provides general citation information and may not be appropriate for your discipline. To receive help in creating a citation based on your discipline, please visit http://libguides.sjfc.edu/citations. This document is posted at http://fisherpub.sjfc.edu/education_ETD_masters/289 and is brought to you for free and open access by Fisher Digital Publications at St. John Fisher College. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Culturally Responsive Multicultural Education Abstract This paper identifies the many facets and importance of a multicultural/culturally responsive education. While a multicultural education affirms issues of identity and differences among people as a positive thing, it also uses this same lens to question and confront both historical and current issues of power and privilege in society. Today multicultural education strives to instruct teachers as to the ways in which culturally and linguistically diverse students learn and function in order for them to receive and experience the most diverse and culturally rich learning possible. Based in recognizing and accepting cultural differences, culturally responsive education is a pedagogy rooted not only in equality but also in fairness.
    [Show full text]
  • In Search of Best Practices for Multicultural Education: Empirical Evidence from the Forum BEVI Project Mary Beth Tabit James Madison University
    James Madison University JMU Scholarly Commons Dissertations The Graduate School Summer 2014 In search of best practices for multicultural education: Empirical evidence from the Forum BEVI Project Mary Beth Tabit James Madison University Follow this and additional works at: https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019 Part of the Psychology Commons Recommended Citation Tabit, Mary Beth, "In search of best practices for multicultural education: Empirical evidence from the Forum BEVI Project" (2014). Dissertations. 96. https://commons.lib.jmu.edu/diss201019/96 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the The Graduate School at JMU Scholarly Commons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations by an authorized administrator of JMU Scholarly Commons. For more information, please contact [email protected]. In Search of Best Practices for Multicultural Education: Empirical Evidence from the Forum BEVI Project Mary Beth Tabit A dissertation submitted to the Graduate Faculty of JAMES MADISON UNIVERSITY In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the degree of Doctor of Psychology Department of Graduate Psychology August 2014 Acknowledgements I would like to extend my sincere gratitude and appreciation to my dissertation chair, Craig Shealy, for his constant support, encouragement, and unwavering confidence in me throughout this process. I would also like to thank Lee Sternberger and Renee Staton, members of my dissertation committee, for their feedback and guidance over the past two years. Additionally, I am incredibly grateful for the contributions and support offered by Lisa Legault, Wenjuan Ma, and Kayan Phoebe Wan. I would also like to thank my family, friends, and future husband; to see the pride you all feel has made this worth it.
    [Show full text]
  • Approaches to Multicultural Education in Preservice Teacher Education Philosophical Frameworks and Models for Teaching
    Personal Perspective Approaches to Multicultural Education in Preservice Teacher Education Philosophical Frameworks and Models for Teaching Earl Bradford Smith Introduction a society with no distinct majority—one cally, linguistically, and socioeconomically characterized by multicultural enclaves, diverse students (Banks, 2000). Today’s startling classroom diversity enormously mixed, encompassing an array Few cases have come before the reflects a major United States demographic of races, cultures, and languages never nation’s Supreme Court that so directly af- shift. According to the U. S. Census Bureau, before seen in schools. fected the minds, hearts, and daily lives of by the year 2040, White non-Hispanics will Teachers face multiple and complex so many Americans as the 1954 landmark make up less than half of the school-aged issues that challenge many of their tradi- Civil Rights case of Brown v. Board of population. By the year 2010, Hispanics tional educational practices and assump- Education of Topeka (Ethridge, 1979). The are projected to account for 43% of United tions. For example, majority-minority cases’s outcome barred the segregation of States population growth. The Hispanic relations, long a focus of concern in urban students by race in public schools. This deci- school-aged population is predicted to in- classrooms, are at the very least reconfig- sion continues to be important to the educa- crease by 64% over the next 20 years. The ured and may, in fact, be moot. In many tion reform movement for two reasons: (a) proportion of school-aged population that schools, there is no longer a majority group; Constitutionally sanctioned racially diverse is Asian non-Hispanic was estimated at 4% in others, the traditional White dominant, classes exist as a result of integration, and in 2000 and is projected to rise to 6.6% by Black minority nature of the racial com- (b) The preparation of teachers to effectively 2025.
    [Show full text]
  • Multicultural Education As a Framework for Educating English Language Learners in the United States
    Peer-Reviewed Article International Journal of Multidisciplinary Perspectives in Higher Education Volume 4, Issue 1 (2019), pp. 22-35 https://www.ojed.org/jimphe Print ISSN 2474-2546 Online ISSN 2474-2554) __________________________________ Multicultural Education as a Framework for Educating English Language Learners in the United States Jerry L. Parker Southeastern Louisiana University, Hammond, Louisiana, United States Email: [email protected] Abstract This article discusses the value of Multicultural Education as a framework for guiding the teaching and learning process in post-secondary education. The focus centers on English Language Learners in the United States throughout all disciplines. An analysis of the five dimensions of Critical Multicultural Education (Banks, 2019) is given along with further commentary on key areas of focus to best guide both English Language Learners and native-born students to a better understanding of the course content and each other. The ideas from this article serve as a starting place for faculty members and higher education administrators from all over the world and across disciplines who seek to re-conceptualize their classrooms and/or the college or university experience to accommodate the ever- diversifying population of students via research in Multicultural Education. Keywords: multicultural education, foreign language education, English language learners, English as a second language __________________________________ Introduction As post-secondary (i.e., community college, trade school, four-year university, technical schools) classrooms become more diverse each year, a focus on multiculturalism, diversity, and inclusion in all areas is needed. Such a focus provides all students with an equitable and equal learning eXperience 22 and the tools to succeed in the classroom.
    [Show full text]
  • Understanding Sexual Prejudice Among Pre-Service Teachers
    Prairie Journal of Educational Research Volume 1 Issue 1 Article 4 2016 Preparing Educators for a Diverse World: Understanding Sexual Prejudice among Pre-Service Teachers Joelyn K. Foy Ph.D. Arkansas State University Newport, [email protected] Sheryl Hodge Ph.D. Kansas State University, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://newprairiepress.org/pjer Part of the Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, Curriculum and Instruction Commons, Curriculum and Social Inquiry Commons, Social and Philosophical Foundations of Education Commons, and the Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-No Derivative Works 4.0 License. Recommended Citation Foy, J. K., & Hodge, S. (2016). Preparing Educators for a Diverse World: Understanding Sexual Prejudice among Pre-Service Teachers. Prairie Journal of Educational Research, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.4148/2373-0994.1005 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by New Prairie Press. It has been accepted for inclusion in Prairie Journal of Educational Research by an authorized administrator of New Prairie Press. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Preparing Educators for a Diverse World: Understanding Sexual Prejudice among Pre-Service Teachers Abstract An important role of schooling in the U.S. is to prepare students for engagement in the diverse world. This means that education personnel must be aware of, acknowledge, and respect all dimensions of diversity, including gender and sexual diversity. Relatedly is the teacher's role in managing a safe and inclusive classroom climate for all students. Since school bullies frequently target gender and sexually diverse (GSD) students, K-12 teachers are required to manage their classroom culture so that bullying behavior toward all students, including GSD students, is stopped.
    [Show full text]
  • Multicultural Education and Ethnic Minorities in Hong Kong 53
    Migration and Language Education, 1 (2), 51–59 (2020) https://doi.org/10.29140/mle.v1n2.363 Multicultural education: How are ethnic minorities labelled and educated in post- handover Hong Kong? FANG GAO a JAN GUBE b a The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong b The Education University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong [email protected] [email protected] Abstract Using multicultural education as a lens, this article details the discursive formation of Hong Kong’s linguistic landscape with a focus on policy arrangements around teaching Chinese as a second language for non-Chinese ethnic minorities since the early 2000s. We pose two research questions: What are the identifiable policy trends in education for ethnic minorities? And how effective are the policy provisions in managing diversity and social justice for ethnic minorities in Hong Kong? The study draws upon documentary analysis to review existing local literature, which highlight the school admission, curriculum design, language teachers’ professional development practices, and assessment pertaining to the education of ethnic minority students. Our analysis reveals a narrow concentration of policies that focus exclusively on supporting ethnic minority students’ Chinese language learning regarded as the barrier to their advancement in education and an omission of other nonlinguistic, structural and ideological challenges and barriers. This barrier contributes to prejudices in school access, curriculum and assessment that function within an assimilationist integration framework. We call for policy measures that broaden the focus of multicultural education for ethnic minorities and that seek to manage ethnolinguistic diversity for equal citizenship rights in the Asian context. Keywords: multicultural education, ethnic minorities, Hong Kong handover Introduction The presence of diverse ethnicities in post-handover Hong Kong (since its return of sovereignty to China in 1997) has been a ground for discussion about its multicultural status.
    [Show full text]
  • Sustainability of Education: an Ecopedagogical Approach
    Journal of Sustainability Studies Volume 1 Issue 1 What is Sustainability Article 5 February 2018 Sustainability of Education: An Ecopedagogical Approach Gary Padgett University of North Alabama, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.una.edu/sustainabilityjournal Part of the Sustainability Commons Recommended Citation Padgett, G. (2018). Sustainability of Education: An Ecopedagogical Approach. Journal of Sustainability Studies, 1 (1). Retrieved from https://ir.una.edu/sustainabilityjournal/vol1/iss1/5 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by UNA Scholarly Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Journal of Sustainability Studies by an authorized editor of UNA Scholarly Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Padgett: Sustainability of Education: An Ecopedagogical Approach Sustainability of Education: An Ecopedagogical Approach Gary Padgett, Ph.D. University of North Alabama Policy Issues / Social Justice Education and Ecopedagogy Dr. Gary Padgett has earned a Ph.D. in Curriculum and Instruction and his research interests involve multicultural education, educational technology, social justice, and the history of education. He has worked in magnet schools, Title I schools, renaissance schools, and in tribal education systems. He is proud to have served as a Title I liaison and as a Title VII teacher representative. He is currently an Assistant Professor in Secondary Education at the University of North Alabama. Abstract This article is a call to action and further research. It also suggests that it is important to move from education about sustainability to the sustainability of education. In the tradition of Freire and Giroux, this article examines the commodification of education stakeholders and the impact this has on education.
    [Show full text]
  • Anti-Bias Multicultural Education Using Children's Literature
    St. Catherine University SOPHIA Masters of Arts in Education Action Research Papers Education 5-2019 Anti-Bias Multicultural Education Using Children’s Literature Rebecca Yates St. Catherine University Follow this and additional works at: https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed Part of the Bilingual, Multilingual, and Multicultural Education Commons, and the Early Childhood Education Commons Recommended Citation Yates, Rebecca. (2019). Anti-Bias Multicultural Education Using Children’s Literature. Retrieved from Sophia, the St. Catherine University repository website: https://sophia.stkate.edu/maed/306 This Action Research Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Education at SOPHIA. It has been accepted for inclusion in Masters of Arts in Education Action Research Papers by an authorized administrator of SOPHIA. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Running head: ANTI-BIAS MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION USING CHILDREN’S LITERATURE Anti-Bias Multicultural Education Using Children’s Literature Submitted on May 16, 2019 in fulfillment of final requirements for the MAED degree Rebecca Yates Saint Catherine University St. Paul, Minnesota Project Coach: Maggie McCaffrey Date: 5/16/2019 ANTI-BIAS MULTICULTURAL EDUCATION USING CHILDREN’S LITERATURE 2 Acknowledgements This work would not have been possible without the support of the administrators and parents at the school where this research was conducted. I am grateful to my advisor for this research project, Maggie McCaffrey, and my professors at St. Catherine University, Liv Christensen and Sarah Hassebroek. Countless thanks to Molly O'Shaughnessy, Liza Davis, and Montessori Center of Minnesota; your passion for Montessori education as a means of social change have inspired and guided me.
    [Show full text]
  • The Multicultural Learning Environment in the USA and the UK
    UNIVERZITA PALACKÉHO V OLOMOUCI FILOZOFICKÁ FAKULTA KATEDRA ANGLISTIKY A AMERIKANISTIKY The Multicultural Learning Environment in the USA and the UK Magisterská diplomová práce BARBORA FIALOVÁ Anglická filologie – Česká filologie Vedoucí práce: PhDr. Matthew Sweney, M.A. Olomouc 2011 Prohlášení Prohlašuji, že jsem tuto diplomovou práci vypracovala samostatně a uvedla úplný seznam citované a použité literatury. V Olomouci dne .................... ........................................... Vlastnoruční podpis 1 Appreciation I would like to thank PhDr. Matthew Sweney, M.A. for supervising my thesis, consultations and general support, to Joyce Kerr and Anna Gradkowska for providing me with information about the schools, for kind answers to my questions and for involving me in the observation of their classes. 2 List of contents Contents Page Annotation 4 Introduction 5 1. Immigration and multicultural societies 7 1.1 The phenomenon of migration and models of multiculturalism around the world 7 1.2 Immigration and the United States 12 1.3 Immigration and the United Kingdom 19 2. Multicultural education 25 2.1 The historical development of multicultural education in the USA 26 2.2 The history of multicultural education in the UK 32 2.3 Dimensions of multicultural education 38 3. USA: John Marshall High School, Los Angeles, California 40 3.1 History and general facts 40 3.2 System of education and policy 41 3.3 ESL classes 44 3.4 ESL class and the classroom interaction 48 3.5 John Marshall High School and the dropout rate 50 4. UK: Westgate
    [Show full text]
  • The Critical Multicultural Education Competencies of Preschool Teachers
    Journal of Education and Learning; Vol. 5, No. 3; 2016 ISSN 1927-5250 E-ISSN 1927-5269 Published by Canadian Center of Science and Education The Critical Multicultural Education Competencies of Preschool Teachers Yasemin Acar-Ciftci1 1 Child Development, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, Istanbul, Turkey Correspondence: Yasemin Acar-Ciftci, Child Development, Istanbul Yeni Yuzyil University, 34010, Istanbul, Turkey. Tel: 90-444-5001-1305. E-mail: [email protected] Received: April 25, 2016 Accepted: May 25, 2016 Online Published: June 27, 2016 doi:10.5539/jel.v5n3p258 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/jel.v5n3p258 Abstract The aim of this study is to determine the perceptions of preschool teachers regarding critical multicultural education competencies. The study is based on “Critical Multicultural Education Competency Model”. The sample of this descriptive research consists of 120 teachers employed at 56 kindergartens and 24 independent nursery classes in the 2014-2015 academic year. The research data is obtained using the “Critical Multicultural Education Competency Scale” (CMECS), which was developed by the researcher. The scale development is carried out with 421 teachers employed in various positions and at different branches in the province of Istanbul. The construct validity is examined by applying exploratory factor analysis and it is found that the scale displays a four-factor structure. The scale, which consists of 42 items, is composed of four sub-dimensions, namely awareness, knowledge, skill and attitude, and the scale can be used as a one-dimensional structure as well. The eligibility of the Critical Multicultural Education Competency Scale (CMECS) for this study is analyzed by looking at the reliability with item analysis.
    [Show full text]