DOCSLIB.ORG

A Reference Is Indexed According to Its Important, Or "Key" the Following Number Is the Series Number

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A Reference Is Indexed According to Its Important, Or 235 Index A reference is indexed according to its important, or "key" The following number is the series number. In this case, 27 words. represents a reference from Memoir 27. Three columns are to the left of the keyword entries. The first The last column entry is the page number in this volume where column, a letter entry, represents the AAPG book series from the reference will be found. which the reference originated. In this case, M stands for Memoir Note: This index is set up for single-line entry. Where entries Series. Every five years, AAPG merges all its indexes together, exceed one line of type, the line is terminated. (This is especially and the letter M will differentiate this reference from those of the evident with manuscript titles, which tend to be long and descrip­ AAPG Studies in Geology Series (S) or from the AAPG Bulletin tive.) The reader sometimes must be able to realize keywords, (B). although commonly taken out of context. M 27 190 ABU DHABI, PLEISTOCENE AEOLIANITE M 27 123 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 194 ABU DHABI, PLEISTOCENE AEOLIANITE M 27 128 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 161 ABU DHABI, QUATERNARY CRUSTS M 27 179 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 157 ABU DHABI,QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS M 27 81 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 158 ABU DHABI, QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS M 27 115 BAHAMAS, PLEISTOCENE DUNES M 27 119 ABU DHABI, QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS M 27 127 BAHAMAS, PLEISTOCENE DUNES M 27 23 ACRITARCHS M 27 161 BAHAMAS, QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS M 27 34 AGGLUTINATING FORAMS M 27 185 BAYS LIMESTONE, VIRGINIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 47 AJAX LIMESTONE, AUSTRALIA, CAMBRIAN M 27 176 BAYS LIMESTONE, VIRGINIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 112 ALABAMA, JURASSIC, SMACKOVER FORMATION M 27 4 BAYS LIMESTONE, VIRGINIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 3 ALGAE,HOLOCENE M 27 206 BECRAFT LIMESTONE, NEW YORK, DEVONIAN M 27 11 ALGAE, CHAROPHYTES, GREEN M 27 77 BECRAFT LIMESTONE, NEW YORK, DEVONIAN M 27 7 ALGAE, HALIMEDA, GREEN M 27 174 BEEKMANTOWN LIMESTONE, MARYLAND, ORDOVICIAN M 27 3 ALGAL BODIES, BLUE-GREEN M 27 90 BELEMNITE ROSTRUMS M 27 183 ALGAL BORINGS M 27 35 BELIZE, HOLOCENE, CORAL-RUBBLE M 27 193 ALGAL BORINGS M 27 18 BELIZE, HOLOCENE, PLANKTON M 27 127 ALGAL BORINGS, OOIDS M 27 59 BELIZE, HOLOCENE BACK-REEF BEACH SANDS M 27 47 ALGAL CRUST, BLUE-GREEN M 27 218 BELIZE, HOLOCENE BEACH SEDIMENTS M 27 190 ALGAL CRUSTS M 27 96 BELIZE, HOLOCENE CORAL RUBBLE M 27 4 ALGAL ENCRUSTATION, BLUE-GREEN M 27 158 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 13 ALGAL ENCRUSTING, RED M 27 101 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 9 ALGALFRAGMENT,DASYCLADACEAN,GREEN M 27 183 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 13 ALGAL FRAGMENT, DOLOMITE REPLACEMENT, RED M 27 159 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 12 ALGAL GRAIN, GONIOLITHON, RED M 27 51 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 10 ALGAL GRAINS, PHYLLOID M 27 60 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 131 ALGAL GRAINS, RED M 27 61 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 3 ALGAL MAT, LAMINATED, BLUE-GREEN M 27 60 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 6 ALGAL NODULE, TUBULES EXAMPLE M 27 32 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 189 ALGAL ONCOLITE, BLUE-GREEN M 27 37 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 6 ALGAL STROMATOLITE, BLUE-GREEN M 27 25 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 4 ALGAL STROMATOLITE, BLUE-GREEN M 27 21 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 211 ALLENTOWN DOLOMITE, PENNSYLVANIA, CAMBRIAN M 27 81 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 89 AMMONITES M 27 83 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 134 ANHYDRITE, REPLACEMENT M 27 95 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 60 ANNULARIS, ARAGONITIC M 27 82 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 157 ARAGONITE CEMENTS M 27 38 BELIZE, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS, PYRGO SP. M 27 158 ARAGONITE CEMENTS M 27 59 BELIZE, PLEISTOCENE, BACK-REEF LIMESTONES M 27 189 ARAGONITE CRUST, CEMENTS M 27 160 BELIZE, QUATERNARY SEDIMENTS M 27 60 ARAGONITIC ANNULARIS M 27 69 BELL CANYON FORMATION, TEXAS, PERMIAN M 27 33 ARENACEOUS FORAMS M 27 17 BERMUDA RISE, EOCENE, DEEP-WATER OOZE M 27 18 ATCO FORMATION, TEXAS, CRETACEOUS M 27 139 BERMUDA RISE, EOCENE DEEP-WATER OOZE M 27 17 ATCO FORMATION, TEXAS, CRETACEOUS M 27 184 BIOEROSION, SPONGE M 27 176 ATHENS LIMESTONE, VIRGINIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 68 BIOHERMAL MOUND, KANSAS, MISSISSIPPIAN M 27 223 AUSTIN GROUP, TEXAS, CRETACEOUS M 27 4 BIOLITHITE M 27 193 AUSTIN GROUP, TEXAS, CRETACEOUS M 27 176 BIOLITHITE, RED ALGAL M 27 220 AUSTIN GROUP, TEXAS, CRETACEOUS M 27 177 BIOMICRITE M 27 47 AUSTRALIA, CAMBRIAN, AJAX LIMESTONE M 27 178 BIOMICRITE, PACKED M 27 205 AUSTRIA, CRETACEOUS, GMUNDEN FLYSCH M 27 175 BIOMICRITES M 27 34 AUSTRIA, CRETACEOUS LIMESTONE M 27 164 BIOSPARITE, CRINOID M 27 124 AUSTRIA, EOCENE, OBERAUDORF SCHICHTEN M 27 178 BIOSPARITE, POORLY-WASHED M 27 177 AUSTRIA, EOCENE, OBERAUDORF SCHICHTEN M 27 164 BIOSPARITE, POROUS M 27 164 AUSTRIA, TRIASSIC, DACHSTEIN LIMESTONE M 27 167 BIOSPARITES M 27 3 AUSTRIA, TRIASSIC DACHSTEIN LIMESTONE M 27 173 BIOSPARITES M 27 131 AVON PARK LIMESTONE, FLORIDA, EOCENE M 27 34 BISERIAL FORAMS M 27 194 AVON PARK LIMESTONE, FLORIDA, EOCENE M 27 200 BLACK RIVER LIMESTONE, PENNSYLVANIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 219 AVON PARK LIMESTONE, FLORIDA, EOCENE M 27 222 BLACK RIVER LIMESTONE, PENNSYLVANIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 59 BACK-REEF BEACH SANDS, BELIZE, HOLOCENE M 27 206 BLACK RIVER LIMESTONE, PENNSYLVANIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 59 BACK-REEF LIMESTONES, BELIZE, PLEISTOCENE M 27 '173 BLACK RIVER LIMESTONE, PENNSYLVANIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 157 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE BEACHROCK M 27 75 BLACK RIVER LIMESTONE, PENNSYLVANIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 189 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE BEACHROCK M 27 72 BLACK RIVER LIMESTONE, PENNSYLVANIA, ORDOVICIAN M 27 117 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 118 BLOYD FORMATION, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIAN M 27 127 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 116 BLOYD FORMATION, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIAN M 27 183 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 167 BLOYD FORMATION, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIAN M 27 127 BAHAMAS, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 35 BLOYD FORMATION, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIAN Downloaded from http://pubs.geoscienceworld.org/books/book/chapter-pdf/3839086/9781629811994_backmatter.pdf by guest on 26 September 2021 236 M 27 96 BLOYD FORMATION, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIAN M 27 144 CLINTON FORMATION, PENNSYLVANIA, SILURIAN M 27 86 BLOYD FORMATION, OKLAHOMA, PENNSYLVANIAN M 27 140 COAMO SPRINGS LIMESTONE, PUERTO RICO, EOCENE M 27 3 BLUE-GREEN ALGAL BODIES M 27 131 COAMO SPRINGS LIMESTONE, PUERTO RICO, EOCENE M 27 47 BLUE-GREEN ALGAL CRUST M 27 13 COAMO SPRINGS LIMESTONE, PUERTO RICO, EOCENE M 27 4 BLUE-GREEN ALGAL ENCRUSTATION M 27 12 COAMO SPRINGS LIMESTONE, PUERTO RICO, EOCENE M 27 3 BLUE-GREEN ALGAL MAT, LAMINATED M 27 33 COAMO SPRINGS LIMESTONE, PUERTO RICO, EOCENE M 27 189 BLUE-GREEN ALGAL ONCOLITE M 27 55 COBLESKILL LIMESTONE, NEW YORK, SILURIAN M 27 4 BLUE-GREEN ALGAL STROMATOLITE M 27 19 COCCOLITH, RHABDOLITH M 27 6 BLUE-GREEN ALGAL STROMATOLITE M 27 168 COCCOLITHS M 27 78 BONE SPRING LIMESTONE, TEXAS, PERMIAN M 27 17 COCCOLITHS, GOLDEN-BROWN ALGAE M 27 32 BONE SPRING LIMESTONE, TEXAS, PERMIAN M 27 18 COCCOSPHERE M 27 183 BORINGS, ALGAL M 27 ]53 COLLOPHANE FRAGMENTS M 27 193 BORINGS, ALGAL M 27 9 COLOMBIA, CRETACEOUS, LIMESTONE M 27 184 BORINGS, SPONGE M 27 107 COLORADO, CRETACEOUS, DAKOTA GROUP M 27 ]83 BORINGS, SUBTIDAL M 27 108 COLORADO, CRETACEOUS, DAKOTA SANDSTONE M 27 184 BORINGS VS. BURROWS, EXAMPLE M 27 177 COLORADO, CRETACEOUS, GREENHORN LIMESTONE M 27 76 BRACHIOPODS, PSEUDOPUNCTATE M 27 36 COLORADO, CRETACEOUS, GREENHORN LIMESTONE M 27 76 BRACHIOPOD, PUNCTATE M 27 105 COLORADO, OLIGOCENE, CREEDE FORMATION M 27 76 BRACHIOPOD GRAINS M 27 11 COLORADO, PENNSYLVANIAN, MINTURN FORMATION M 27 78 BRACHIOPOD SPINES M 27 10 COLORADO, PENNSYLVANIAN, MINTURN FORMATION M 27 72 BRACHIOPODS M 27 207 COMPACTION AFTER CEMENTATION M 27 75 BRACHIOPODS M 27 139 CONOCOCHEAGUE LIMESTONE, VIRGINIA, CAMBRIAN M 27 77 BRACHIOPODS, PSEUDOPUNCTATE M 27 141 CONOCOCHEAGUE LIMESTONE, VIRGINIA, CAMBRIAN M 27 50 BROWNSPORT GROUP, TENNESSEE, SILURIAN M 27 26 CONODONTS M 27 71 BRYOZOAN FROND M 27 27 CONODONTS M 27 67 BRYOZOANS M 27 141 COPPER RIDGE DOLOMITE, VIRGINIA, CAMBRIAN M 27 70 BRYOZOANS, CRYPTOSOME M 27 140 COPPER RIDGE DOLOMITE, VIRGINIA, CAMBRIAN M 27 68 BRYOZOANS, FENESTRATE M 27 139 COPPER RIDGE DOLOMITE, VIRGINIA, CAMBRIAN M 27 69 BRYOZOANS, FENESTRATE M 27 63 CORAL LIMESTONE, ENGLAND, CARBONIFEROUS M 27 71 BRYOZOANS, MODERN ENCRUSTERS M 27 164 CORAL LIMESTONE, ENGLAND, MISSISSIPPIAN M 27 2] BUDA LIMESTONE, TEXAS, CRETACEOUS M 27 36 CORAL SEA, HOLOCENE OOZE M 27 185 BURROWS, FILLED M 27 90 CORAL SEA, HOLOCENE SEDIMENTS M 27 184 BURROWS VS. BORINGS, EXAMPLE M 27 41 CORALLIAN SERIES, ENGLAND, JURASSIC M 27 12 CALCARENITE, MUSCAT, OMAN, TERTIARY M 27 59 CORALS, SCLERACTINIAN M 27 49 CALCAREOUS SPONGES M 27 61 CORALS, SCLERACTINIAN M 27 21 CALCISPHERES M 27 62 CORALS, COLONIAL, RUGOSE M 27 48 CALCISPONGES M 27 61 CORALS, SILICIFIED, TABULATE M 27 164 CALCITE, FIBROUS M 27 62 CORALS, SOLITARY, RUGOSE M 27 159 CALCITE CEMENTS M 27 63 CORALS, SOLITARY, RUGOSE M 27 217 CALCITE-FILLED INTERPARTICLE POROSITIES M 27 35 CORAL-RUBBLE, BELIZE, HOLOCENE M 27 124 CALCLITHITE, EXTRACLASTS M 27 143 CRAIE GRISE, NETHERLANDS, CRETACEOUS M 27 177 CALCLITHITES, POLYMICT M 27 105 CREEDE FORMATION, COLORADO, OLIGOCENE M 27 119 CALICHE M 27 153 CRETACEOUS, SAN CARLOS FORMATION, TEXAS M 27 189 CALICHE, LAMINATED M 27 18 CRETACEOUS, ATCO FORMATION, TEXAS M 27 189 CALICHE CRUST, TEXAS, QUATERNARY M 27 17 CRETACEOUS, ATCO FORMATION, TEXAS M 27 25 CALIFORNIA, JURASSIC, FRANCISCAN FORMATION M 27 223 CRETACEOUS, AUSTIN GROUP, TEXAS M 27 23 CALIFORNIA, JURASSIC, POINT SAL OPHIOLITE M 27 193 CRETACEOUS, AUSTIN GROUP, TEXAS M 27 24 CALIFORNIA, JURASSIC, POINT SAL OPHIOLITE M 27 220 CRETACEOUS, AUSTIN GROUP, TEXAS M 27
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Spatial Variation in Predation in the Plio-Pleistocene Pinecrest Beds, Florida, USA
    Spatial Variation in Predation in the Plio-Pleistocene Pinecrest Beds, Florida, USA Frank L. Forcino, Holly J. Hurding-Jones, and Emily S. Stafford No. 4 Eastern Paleontologist 2019 EASTERN PALEONTOLOGIST Board of Editors ♦ The Eastern Paleontologist is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes articles focusing on the Brian Axsmith, University of South Alabama, paleontology of eastern North America (ISSN Mobile, AL 2475-5117 [online]). Manuscripts based on studies Richard Bailey, Northeastern University, Boston, outside of this region that provide information on MA aspects of paleontology within this region may be David Bohaska, Smithsonian Institution, Wash- considered at the Editor’s discretion. ington, DC ♦ Manuscript subject matter - The journal wel- Michael E. Burns, Jacksonville State University, comes manuscripts based on paleontological Jacksonville, AL discoveries of terrestrial, freshwater, and marine Laura Cotton, Florida Museum of Natural His- organisms and their communities. Manuscript tory, Gainesville, FL subjects may include paleozoology, paleobotany, Dana J. Ehret, New Jersey State Museum, Tren- micropaleontology, systematics/taxonomy and ton, NJ specimen-based research, paleoecology (includ- Robert Feranec, New York State Museum, Al- ing trace fossils), paleoenvironments, paleobio- bany, NY geography, and paleoclimate. Steven E. Fields, Culture and Heritage Museums, ♦ It offers article-by-article online publication Rock Hill, SC for prompt distribution to a global audience. Timothy J. Gaudin, University of Tennessee, ♦ It offers authors the option of publishing large Chattanooga, TN files such as data tables, and audio and video Richard Michael Gramly, American Society for clips as online supplemental files. Amateur Archaeologists, North Andover, MA ♦ Special issues - The Eastern Paleontologist Russell Graham, College of Earth and Mineral welcomes proposals for special issues that are Sciences, University Park, PA based on conference proceedings or on a series Alex Hastings, Virginia Museum of Natural His- of invitational articles.
    [Show full text]
  • Cretaceous Boundary in Western Cuba (Sierra De Los Órganos)
    GEOLOGICA CARPATHICA, JUNE 2013, 64, 3, 195—208 doi: 10.2478/geoca-2013-0014 Calpionellid distribution and microfacies across the Jurassic/ Cretaceous boundary in western Cuba (Sierra de los Órganos) RAFAEL LÓPEZ-MARTÍNEZ1, , RICARDO BARRAGÁN1, DANIELA REHÁKOVÁ2 and JORGE LUIS COBIELLA-REGUERA3 1Instituto de Geología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad Universitaria, Delegación Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México D.F., México; [email protected] 2Comenius University, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Geology and Paleontology, Mlynská dolina G, 842 15 Bratislava, Slovak Republic; [email protected] 3Departamento de Geología, Universidad de Pinar del Río, Martí # 270, Pinar del Río, C.P. 20100, Cuba (Manuscript received May 21, 2012; accepted in revised form December 11, 2012) Abstract: A detailed bed-by-bed sampled stratigraphic section of the Guasasa Formation in the Rancho San Vicente area of the “Sierra de los Órganos”, western Cuba, provides well-supported evidence about facies and calpionellid distribution across the Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary. These new data allowed the definition of an updated and sound calpionellid biozonation scheme for the section. In this scheme, the drowning event of a carbonate platform displayed by the facies of the San Vicente Member, the lowermost unit of the section, is dated as Late Tithonian, Boneti Subzone. The Jurassic/Cretaceous boundary was recognized within the facies of the overlying El Americano Member on the basis of the acme of Calpionella alpina Lorenz. The boundary is placed nearly six meters above the contact between the San Vicente and the El Americano Members, in a facies linked to a sea-level drop. The recorded calpionellid bioevents should allow correlations of the Cuban biozonation scheme herein proposed, with other previously published schemes from distant areas of the Tethyan Domain.
    [Show full text]
  • Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED the Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 Million Years Ago) PARADISE ISLAND
    Exhibit Specimen List FLORIDA SUBMERGED The Cretaceous, Paleocene, and Eocene (145 to 34 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Avon Park Formation, Dolostone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with echinoid sand dollar fossil (Periarchus lyelli); specimen from Florida Geological Survey Avon Park Formation, Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; with organic layers containing seagrass remains from formation in shallow marine environment; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Upper), Limestone from Eocene time; Jackson County, Florida; with foraminifera; specimen from Florida Geological Survey Ocala Limestone (Lower), Limestone from Eocene time; Citrus County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection OTHER Anhydrite, Evaporite from early Cenozoic time; Unknown location, Florida; from subsurface core, showing evaporite sequence, older than Avon Park Formation; specimen from Florida Geological Survey FOSSILS Tethyan Gastropod Fossil, (Velates floridanus); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimen from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Barge Canal spoil island, Levy County, Florida; specimens from Tanner Collection Echinoid Sea Biscuit Fossils, (Eupatagus antillarum); In Ocala Limestone from Eocene time; Mouth of Withlacoochee River, Levy County, Florida; specimens from John Sacha Collection PARADISE ISLAND The Oligocene (34 to 23 million years ago) FLORIDA FORMATIONS Suwannee
    [Show full text]
  • Paleontological Resources at Grand Teton National Park, Northwestern Wyoming Vincent L
    University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report Volume 22 22nd Annual Report, 1998 Article 7 1-1-1998 Paleontological Resources at Grand Teton National Park, Northwestern Wyoming Vincent L. Santucci National Park Service William P. Wall Georgia College and State University Follow this and additional works at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/uwnpsrc_reports Recommended Citation Santucci, Vincent L. and Wall, William P. (1998) "Paleontological Resources at Grand Teton National Park, Northwestern Wyoming," University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report: Vol. 22 , Article 7. Available at: http://repository.uwyo.edu/uwnpsrc_reports/vol22/iss1/7 This Grand Teton National Park Report is brought to you for free and open access by Wyoming Scholars Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in University of Wyoming National Park Service Research Center Annual Report by an authorized editor of Wyoming Scholars Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Santucci and Wall: Paleontological Resources at Grand Teton National Park, Northwest PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES AT GRAND TETON NATIONAL PARK, NORTHWESTERN WYOMING + VINCENT L. SANTUCCI+ NATIONAL PARK SERVICE KEMMERER + WY WILLIAM P. WALL+ DEPARTMENT OF BIOLOGY GEORGIA COLLEGE AND STATE UNIVERSITY MILLEDGEVILLE + GA + ABSTRACT landscape, and though the last great ice masses melted 15 ,000 years ago, some re-established small Paleontological resources occur throughout glaciers still exist. the formations exposed in Grand Teton National Park. A comprehensive paleontological survey has This report provides a preliminary not been attempted previously at Grand Teton assessment of paleontological resources identified at National Park. Preliminary paleontologic resource Grand Teton National Park. data is given in this report in order to establish baseline data.
    [Show full text]
  • Surface Geology Wind/Bighorn River Basin Wyoming and Montana
    WYOMING STATE GEOLOGICAL SURVEY Plate I Thomas A. Drean, State Geologist Wind/Bighorn Basin Plan II - Available Groundwater Determination Technical Memorandum Surface Geology - Wind/Bighorn River Basin SWEET GRASS R25E R5E R15E R30E R10E R20E MONTANA Mm PM Jsg T7S KJ !c Pp Jsg KJ water Qt Surface Geology Ti ! Red Lodge PM DO PM PM Ts Ts p^r PM N ^r DO KJ DO !c Wind/Bighorn River Basin Tts Mm water Mm Ti Ti ^r DO Kmt Ti LOCATION MAP p^r ^r ^r Qt WYOMING Wyoming and Montana Kf Qt Ti p^r !c p^r PM 0 100 250 Miles Tts ^r PM DO Ti Jsg MD Ts Ti MzPz Kmv !Pg Qt compiled DO DO Tts Ts Taw DO DO DO water Qt Kc PM ^r Twl Qt Ob O^ by ^r Mm DO !c MD MONTANA Thr Ti Kc Qr Klc p^r Kmv Kc : # Ts ^r : O^ Nikolaus Gribb, Brett Worman, # Ts # water : PM Taw # Kf : PM !cd : Ket Qb Taw Qu Twp Thr # Ki Twl 345 P$Ma : Thr O^ Qa KJg Tfu : Jsg ^r Qu : :: # Kl (! KJk : Qr Qls Tomas Gracias, and Scott Quillinan Qb : Thr Ts Taw # Tfu 37 PM Kft: : # :: T10S Qls # Thr : # ^r Kc (! Kft Kmt # :::::: p^r :: : Qu KJk Kc MD Taw DO Qu # p^r Qg :: Km KJ WYOMING Taw Ti : Kl 2012 Thr : Qb # # # Qg : water DO Qls ::: !c !Pg !cd MDO water water Kc Qa :::::: :: Kmt ::: : Twl 90 : Ti Ts Qu Qa Qg Kmv !Pcg Mm KJk : Qg : 212 : Qu Qg £¤ Kmv KJ ¨¦§ Tts Taw p^r ^r # Kl : Kf Kf 338 Ob !cd Qu Qu Ttp # (! : : : p^r ::: !Pg O^ MD P$Ma Thr : Qa # DO Km Qls 343 ^r Qls Taw : Qb Qg Qls Qa Km Jsg water (! : Qb # !cd ^r Kc BighornLake : MD # Taw Qa Qls Qt MD A′ MD MD Qg Twl !Pg Qu Qb Tii # Twp ^r water MzPz Qg Tfu Kl ::: Taw Taw Twp Qls : Qt Kmv Qa Ob P$Ma : Thr Qa # Tcr ^r water Qa Kft # Qt O^
    [Show full text]
  • Cuatrociénegas Basin, Mexico
    Identifying origins of and pathways for spring waters in a semiarid basin using He, Sr, and C isotopes: Cuatrociénegas Basin, Mexico B.D. Wolaver1,*, L.J. Crossey2,*, K.E. Karlstrom2,*, J.L. Banner3,*, M.B. Cardenas3,*, C. Gutiérrez Ojeda4,*, and J.M. Sharp, Jr.3,* 1Bureau of Economic Geology, University of Texas at Austin, 10100 Burnet Road, Austin, Texas 78758, USA 2Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, University of New Mexico, MSCO3-2040, 1 University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131, USA 3Department of Geological Sciences, University of Texas at Austin, 1 University Station, Austin, Texas 78712-0254, USA 4Instituto Mexicano de Tecnología del Agua (IMTA), Paseo Cuauhnáhuac 8532, Colonia Progreso, 62550 Jiutepec, Morelos, México ABSTRACT mantle-derived He (to 23% of the total He) species (Hendrickson et al., 2008; Fig. 2). ≤ –1 and CO2 (pCO2 10 atm). Mantle degas- Springs have varied spatial distribution and geo- He, C, and Sr isotopes are used to infer sing is compatible with the thinned North chemistry. Spring vents are often obscured by spring sources in a water-stressed area. American lithosphere, as shown in tomo- valley-fi ll alluvium, but high-discharge springs Spring-water origins and pathways in the graphic images. Sr isotopes in both Cuatro- generally issue directly from fractures in Creta- Cuatrociénegas Basin are revealed by linking ciénegas Basin springs and spring-deposited ceous carbonate rocks. Other springs are located structure and geochemistry via regionally travertine (87Sr/86Sr = 0.707428–0.707468) at the base of alluvial fans (Wolaver and Diehl, extensive fault networks. This study presents indicate that carbonate rocks of the regional 2011).
    [Show full text]
  • The Late Jurassic Tithonian, a Greenhouse Phase in the Middle Jurassic–Early Cretaceous ‘Cool’ Mode: Evidence from the Cyclic Adriatic Platform, Croatia
    Sedimentology (2007) 54, 317–337 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3091.2006.00837.x The Late Jurassic Tithonian, a greenhouse phase in the Middle Jurassic–Early Cretaceous ‘cool’ mode: evidence from the cyclic Adriatic Platform, Croatia ANTUN HUSINEC* and J. FRED READ *Croatian Geological Survey, Sachsova 2, HR-10000 Zagreb, Croatia Department of Geosciences, Virginia Tech, 4044 Derring Hall, Blacksburg, VA 24061, USA (E-mail: [email protected]) ABSTRACT Well-exposed Mesozoic sections of the Bahama-like Adriatic Platform along the Dalmatian coast (southern Croatia) reveal the detailed stacking patterns of cyclic facies within the rapidly subsiding Late Jurassic (Tithonian) shallow platform-interior (over 750 m thick, ca 5–6 Myr duration). Facies within parasequences include dasyclad-oncoid mudstone-wackestone-floatstone and skeletal-peloid wackestone-packstone (shallow lagoon), intraclast-peloid packstone and grainstone (shoal), radial-ooid grainstone (hypersaline shallow subtidal/intertidal shoals and ponds), lime mudstone (restricted lagoon), fenestral carbonates and microbial laminites (tidal flat). Parasequences in the overall transgressive Lower Tithonian sections are 1– 4Æ5 m thick, and dominated by subtidal facies, some of which are capped by very shallow-water grainstone-packstone or restricted lime mudstone; laminated tidal caps become common only towards the interior of the platform. Parasequences in the regressive Upper Tithonian are dominated by peritidal facies with distinctive basal oolite units and well-developed laminate caps. Maximum water depths of facies within parasequences (estimated from stratigraphic distance of the facies to the base of the tidal flat units capping parasequences) were generally <4 m, and facies show strongly overlapping depth ranges suggesting facies mosaics. Parasequences were formed by precessional (20 kyr) orbital forcing and form parasequence sets of 100 and 400 kyr eccentricity bundles.
    [Show full text]
  • Sedimentologic, Stable Isotopic, and Paleomagnetic Analysis of Laramide Synorogenic Strata: Unroofing of the Beartooth Range, Montana and Wyoming
    Western Washington University Western CEDAR WWU Graduate School Collection WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship 2012 Sedimentologic, stable isotopic, and paleomagnetic analysis of Laramide synorogenic strata: unroofing of the Beartooth Range, Montana and Wyoming Austin S. Hart Western Washington University Follow this and additional works at: https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet Part of the Geology Commons Recommended Citation Hart, Austin S., "Sedimentologic, stable isotopic, and paleomagnetic analysis of Laramide synorogenic strata: unroofing of the Beartooth Range, Montana and Wyoming" (2012). WWU Graduate School Collection. 203. https://cedar.wwu.edu/wwuet/203 This Masters Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the WWU Graduate and Undergraduate Scholarship at Western CEDAR. It has been accepted for inclusion in WWU Graduate School Collection by an authorized administrator of Western CEDAR. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Sedimentologic, stable isotopic, and paleomagnetic analysis of Laramide synorogenic strata: unroofing of the Beartooth Range, Montana and Wyoming By Austin S. Hart Accepted in Partial Completion of the Requirements for Degree Master of Science Kathleen L. Kitto, Dean of the Graduate School ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Chair, Dr. Christopher A. Suczek Dr. Elizabeth R. Schermer Dr. Russell F. Burmester Master’s Thesis In presenting this thesis in partial fulfillment of the requirements for a master’s degree at Western Washington University, I grant to Western Washington University the non‐exclusive royalty‐free right to archive, reproduce, distribute, and display the thesis in any and all forms, including electronic format, via any digital library mechanisms maintained by WWU. I represent and warrant this is my original work, and does not infringe or violate any rights of others.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix 1 – Environmental Predictor Data
    APPENDIX 1 – ENVIRONMENTAL PREDICTOR DATA CONTENTS Overview ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Climate ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................................... 3 Land Use and Land Cover ..................................................................................................................................................... 3 Soils and Substrate .................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................................. 10 References ................................................................................................................................................................................ 12 1 OVERVIEW A set of 94 potential predictor layers compiled to use in distribution modeling for the target taxa. Many of these layers derive from previous modeling work by WYNDD1, 2, but a
    [Show full text]
  • Remarks on the Tithonian–Berriasian Ammonite Biostratigraphy of West Central Argentina
    Volumina Jurassica, 2015, Xiii (2): 23–52 DOI: 10.5604/17313708 .1185692 Remarks on the Tithonian–Berriasian ammonite biostratigraphy of west central Argentina Alberto C. RICCARDI 1 Key words: Tithonian–Berriasian, ammonites, west central Argentina, calpionellids, nannofossils, radiolarians, geochronology. Abstract. Status and correlation of Andean ammonite biozones are reviewed. Available calpionellid, nannofossil, and radiolarian data, as well as radioisotopic ages, are also considered, especially when directly related to ammonite zones. There is no attempt to deal with the definition of the Jurassic–Cretaceous limit. Correlation of the V. mendozanum Zone with the Semiforme Zone is ratified, but it is open to question if its lower part should be correlated with the upper part of the Darwini Zone. The Pseudolissoceras zitteli Zone is characterized by an assemblage also recorded from Mexico, Cuba and the Betic Ranges of Spain, indicative of the Semiforme–Fallauxi standard zones. The Aulacosphinctes proximus Zone, which is correlated with the Ponti Standard Zone, appears to be closely related to the overlying Wind­ hauseniceras internispinosum Zone, although its biostratigraphic status needs to be reconsidered. On the basis of ammonites, radiolarians and calpionellids the Windhauseniceras internispinosum Assemblage Zone is approximately equivalent to the Suarites bituberculatum Zone of Mexico, the Paralytohoplites caribbeanus Zone of Cuba and the Simplisphinctes/Microcanthum Zone of the Standard Zonation. The C. alternans Zone could be correlated with the uppermost Microcanthum and “Durangites” zones, although in west central Argentina it could be mostly restricted to levels equivalent to the “Durangites Zone”. The Substeueroceras koeneni Zone ranges into the Occitanica Zone, Subalpina and Privasensis subzones, the A.
    [Show full text]
  • A Palaeobiological Window Into the Lower Cretaceous Cupido Formation: Puerto México Section, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
    Carnets Geol. 18 (8) E-ISSN 1634-0744 DOI 10.4267/2042/68182 A palaeobiological window into the Lower Cretaceous Cupido Formation: Puerto México section, Nuevo Leon, Mexico Felipe TORRES DE LA CRUZ 1 Elizabeth CHACÓN-BACA 1, 2 Yesica Edith GÓMEZ-MANCHA 1 Tomás COSSÍO-TORRES 1 Abstract: A rich geobiological record of Cretaceous biotic and abiotic interactions around the proto- Gulf of Mexico has been preserved in the massive Cupido carbonate platform, i.e., in a sedimentary se- quence that represents a depositional period of approximately 15 Myr. This work documents lateral fa- cies variation on a dip slope reef from a new outcrop in the upper part of the Cupido Formation in the state of Nuevo Leon, Mexico. The measured transect is correlated with a stratigraphic column logged in a nearby section. The preserved fossil biota represents marginal reef facies dominated by abundant rudist shells such as Douvillelia skeltoni, Toucasia sp., Offneria sp., and Amphitrocoelus sp. associated with relatively large colonial corals (with diameters up to 25 cm) like Stelidioseris sp. and to a lesser extent, with stromatoporoids. Benthic foraminifers (miliolids and textularids) with associated dasycla- dalean algae such as Salpingorella sp. and Terquemella spp. dominate the microfossiliferous content in wackestones to packstones. This facies is overlain by a thin (15-30 cm) stromatolite horizon at the upper end of the measured section. This locality represents a new paleobiological and taphonomic win- dow into one of the most extensive carbonate platform system developed along the margin of the Gulf of Mexico during the Cretaceous. Key-words: • Cretaceous; • Cupido Formation; • Puerto Mexico; • rudists; • corals; • stromatoporoids Citation: TORRES DE LA CRUZ F., CHACÓN-BACA E., GÓMEZ-MANCHA Y.E.
    [Show full text]
  • SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology
    SEPM Society for Sedimentary Geology 4111 S Darlington Phone: 918-610-3361 Suite 100 Fax: 918-621-1685 Tulsa, Oklahoma 74135 www.sepm.org USA This PDF Content is made available by SEPM—Society for Sedi- mentary Geology for non-commercial use. This file does contain security features to prevent changing, copying items or printing the document. Additional restrictions and information can be found below. ———————–———————————————————- Connect to other SEPM publications below. www.sepm.org to learn more about the Society, membership, conferences and other publications www.sepm.org/bookstore/storehome.htm for purchase other SEPM Book Publications. www.sepmonline.org to access both Book and Journals online. ————————————————–——————————- Copyright not claimed on content prepared by wholly by U.S. government employees within scope of their employment. Individual scientists are granted permission, without fees or fur- ther requests to SEPM, to use a single figure, a single table, and/or a brief paragraph of text in subsequent works. To make unlimited copies of items in SEPM publications for noncommercial use in classrooms to further education and science without fees please contact SEPM. This file may not be posted to any other Web site. SEPM provides this and other forums for the presentation for the of diverse opinions and positions by scientists globally. Ideas in this publications do not necessarily reflect the official position of the Society. CONTROLS ON CYCLOSTRATIGRAPHY OF LOWER CRETACEOUS CARBONATES AND EVAPORITES, CUPIDO AND COAHUILA PLATFORMS, NORTHEASTERN MEXICO CHRISTOPH LEHMANN1*, DAVID A. OSLEGER2, AND ISABEL P. MONTANÄ EZ2 1 Department of Earth Sciences, University of California, Riverside, California 92521, U.S.A.
    [Show full text]