Financial Aspects in the Re-Use of Ancillary Buildings At
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
University of Pennsylvania ScholarlyCommons Theses (Historic Preservation) Graduate Program in Historic Preservation 1999 What to Do with the Barn?: Financial Aspects in the Re-Use of Ancillary Buildings at Three Non-Profit Historic Sites as Non- Interpretive, Revenue Generating Entities: A Look into Historic Bartram's Gardens, Lyndhurst, and Shelburne Farms Nicholas Moses Corrette University of Pennsylvania Follow this and additional works at: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses Part of the Historic Preservation and Conservation Commons Corrette, Nicholas Moses, "What to Do with the Barn?: Financial Aspects in the Re-Use of Ancillary Buildings at Three Non-Profit Historic Sites as Non-Interpretive, Revenue Generating Entities: A Look into Historic Bartram's Gardens, Lyndhurst, and Shelburne Farms" (1999). Theses (Historic Preservation). 500. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/500 Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Corrette, Nicholas Moses (1999). What to Do with the Barn?: Financial Aspects in the Re-Use of Ancillary Buildings at Three Non-Profit Historic Sites as Non-Interpretive, Revenue Generating Entities: A Look into Historic Bartram's Gardens, Lyndhurst, and Shelburne Farms. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This paper is posted at ScholarlyCommons. https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/500 For more information, please contact [email protected]. What to Do with the Barn?: Financial Aspects in the Re-Use of Ancillary Buildings at Three Non-Profit Historic Sites as Non-Interpretive, Revenue Generating Entities: A Look into Historic Bartram's Gardens, Lyndhurst, and Shelburne Farms Disciplines Historic Preservation and Conservation Comments Copyright note: Penn School of Design permits distribution and display of this student work by University of Pennsylvania Libraries. Suggested Citation: Corrette, Nicholas Moses (1999). What to Do with the Barn?: Financial Aspects in the Re-Use of Ancillary Buildings at Three Non-Profit Historic Sites as Non-Interpretive, Revenue Generating Entities: A Look into Historic Bartram's Gardens, Lyndhurst, and Shelburne Farms. (Masters Thesis). University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA. This thesis or dissertation is available at ScholarlyCommons: https://repository.upenn.edu/hp_theses/500 mm- UNIVERSITY^ PENNSYLVANIA. LIBRARIES ; ^ WHAT TO DO WITH THE BARN? FINANCIAL ASPECTS IN THE RE-USE OF ANCILLARY BUILDINGS AT THREE NON-PROFIT HISTORIC SITES AS NON-INTERPRETIVE, REVENUE GENERATING ENTITIES: A LOOK INTO HISTORIC BARTRAM'S GARDENS, LYNDHURST, AND SHELBURNE FARMS Nicholas Moses Corrette A THESIS in Historic Preservation Presented to the Faculties of The University of Pennsylvania in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE 1999 Roger Joif/ne Jameson, Adjunct Associate Professor, Senior Lecturer, Pels Center of Government Advisor Reader G. De CCng, (— Graduate Group Chairman Of ^ j.tBRARiES ^. ACKNOWLEDGMENTS This page offers me the rare opportunity to thank the people who are responsible for bringing me to this point. Without them I would not be the person I am now. I have been raised in a family that values history, especially family history. I dedicate this work to my parents Ray and Linda; my grandparents; aunts, great aunts and uncles; and the rest of the family. I also would like to thank my educators: Renbrook Faculty, Watkinson Faculty, University of Rhode Island faculty; and University of Vermont Faculty. I would further like to dedicate this to my friends in Vermont I had to leave, we all knew it had to happen. I need also to thank the faculty at the University of Pennsylvania, who form an invaluable resource to the preservation community. Additionally I would like to thank the administrators of the three sites I have been working with during the writing of this thesis: from The John Bartram Association, Martha Wolf; at Lyndhurst, Susanne B. Pandich; and at Shelburne Farms Resources, Alec Webb. quae nocent, docent u TABLE OF CONTENTS Acknowledgments iii List of Figures iv Chapter 1 Introduction 1 Chapter 2 Historic Bartram's Gardens 8 Chapter 3 Lyndhurst 21 Chapter 4 Shelburne Farms 33 Chapter 5 Conclusions 46 Index 62 Bibliography 64 Appendix A Historic Bartram's Garder\s 72 Barn Renovation Plans, Dagit Saylor Barn Renovation Plans, James Dart Appendix B Lyndhurst 88 Map of Lyndhurst grounds by Ward Carpenter, 1873 Draft Request for Proposal: Catering Services Coach Barn Fee Schedule and Contract Appendix C Shelburne Farms 100 Map of Shelburne Farms Inn and Coach Barn Long Range Plan Statement of Revenues and Expenses by Division Consolidated Statement of Revenues and Expenses 111 LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 Exterior of Historic Bartram's Gardens 8 Figure 2 Seed House at Historic Bartram's Gardens 13 Figure 3 Bartram Stable and Carriage Barn 14 Figure 4 Bartram's Gardens Barn showing construction 15 Figure 5 Lyndhurst, HABS drawing 21 Figure 6 Funding sources for Lyndhurst Carriage Barn renovation 26 Figure 7 Carriage House at Lyndhurst from courtyard 28 Figure 8 The Greenhouse at Lyndhurst 29 Figure 9 The Gaming PaviUon at Lyndhurst 30 Figure 10 The Dock at Mount Vernon 32 Figure 11 Blueprint of Shelburne House 33 Figure 12 The Farm Barn at Shelburne Farms 36 Figure 13 The Breeding Barn at Shelburne Farms 37 Figure 14 The Old Dairy at Shelburne Farms 38 Figure 15 The Coach Barn at Shelburne Farms 39 Figure 16 John Bartram Association Income 52 Figure 17 Lyndhurst Income 54 Figure 18 Shelburne Farms Resources Income 56 Figure 19 Comparative Income Levels 57 Figure 20 Comparative Income, Expenditures, Endowment 58 Figure 21 Capitalization 59 Figure 22 Historic photo of barn complex. Historic Bartram's Gardens 72 Figure 23 Historic photo of barn complex, Lyndhurst 88 Figure 24 Historic photo of Coach Barn, Shelburne Farms 100 IV Chapter One: Introduction ^ This thesis examines some issues relating to the reuse of ancillary structures on three non-profit historic sites; most specifically, the financial aspects of the reuse. Many historic sites in the United States have multiple buildings, and they have the need to raise money, add to programming goals, and keep some sort of promise to the future generations to preserve the site. The overarching premise I have made concerns the historic nature of the buildings themselves. The assumption is that many historic sites cannot afford to maintain these buildings to an historically accurate standard without altering their original use. But how are the modifications to be paid for? How responsive must the buildings be with regard to the overall finances of the non-profit organization? And, finally, is there a conflict with the mission of a not-for-profit when engaging in for- profit commerce? These are some of the major issues I intend to explore. Traditionally an historic site was thought to be just the public rooms of the main structure. Museums would show the parlors and the best bed chamber as representative of the lives of the inhabitants. In recent decades, however, visitors have demonstrated to the museum community that they are also interested in the "service sections" of the house. Many sites have responded, as has Biltmore House and Gardens, by adding expanded tours. ' http://www. biltmore. com (April 1999):Biltmore Estate admission ticket includes: a self-guided visit through four floors of Biltmore House, including living and entertainment areas, the Kitchens, indoor recreation areas, and servants' quarters; a self-guided visit to Biltmore's many acres of gardens and walking trails. Another tour of the winery is also available. 2 This has proven very successful for Biltmore.^ Additionally there has long been an interest in the landscape tour of the grounds. Many sites offer self- guided tours with an accompanying brochure.^ Preservationists are now faced with ancillary buildings that supported the large sites functionally in their historical context, and the expectation that they will be interpreted or reused today. To reuse in this context is to recapture an original function,"^ perhaps with a new purpose that will also support the overall program at the site. Unused ancillary buildings can be thought of as financial burdens to a site, or worse, ignored, and allowed to deteriorate for lack of interest or use. New uses for old buildings may include conference centers, gift shops, curatorial offices, restaurants or catering facilities - to name but a few of the most obvious choices. It is thought that the highest and best use for a building is the purpose for which it was originally designed and used. A museum interpretation of original use is a common and accepted substitute. This works well enough for houses,^ but it falls short in a real world scenario for historic bams and other secondary buildings. The problem is inherent to many historic sites. - "Biltmore Estate: As the Century Turns", William A. V. Cecil, Jr., Chief Executive Director, Biltmore Estate. Presentation given on December 5, 1998, at American House Museums in the 21st Century Symposium held at the Athenaeum of Philadelphia (to be published in 1999 on the Athenaeum's web site at http://www.libertynet.org/athena/ ). ^ Patricia M O'Donnell, "Relating Integrity to Interpretation" Cultural Recourse Management (1994 No.7): pp. 12-15. ^ What I mean here is not the actual original function physically, but generally, as the relationship of the hierarchy of buildings on any sort of estate, that the barns and other structures are second to the main house, and serve as support for them. So it is the role of the building, rather than the specific functions that were historically performed there. Defining the role of ancillary buildings on large historic sites is not a new problem, and currently it may not be adequately solved. It is hoped that the information gathered herein may be of some use to sites that are in the process of deciding how to make the best use of their ancillary buildings by looking at three cases where efforts have been made, and the results that have been seen thus far.