DOCSLIB.ORG

Regional Planning Guidance for the South East (RPG 9)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Regional Planning Guidance for the South East (RPG 9) Published by The Stationery Office and available from: The Stationery Office (mail, telephone and fax orders only) PO Box 29, Norwich NR3 1GN General enquiries/Telephone orders 0870 600 5522 Fax orders 0870 600 5533 www.thestationeryoffice.com The Stationery Office Bookshops 123 Kingsway, London WC2B 6PQ 020 7242 6393 Fax 020 7242 6394 68-69 Bull Street, Birmingham B4 6AD 0121 236 9696 Fax 0121 236 9699 33 Wine Street, Bristol BS1 2BQ 0117 926 4306 Fax 0117 929 4515 9-21 Princess Street, Manchester M60 8AS 0161 834 7201 Fax 0161 833 0634 16 Arthur Street, Belfast BT1 4GD 028 9023 8451 Fax 028 9023 5401 The Stationery Office Oriel Bookshop 18-19 High Street, Cardiff CF1 2BZ 029 2039 5548 Fax 029 2038 4347 71 Lothian Road, Edinburgh EH3 9AZ 0870 606 5566 Fax 0870 606 5588 The Stationery Office’s Accredited Agents (see Yellow Pages) and through good booksellers £18 GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR THE SOUTH EAST GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR EAST OF ENGLAND GOVERNMENT OFFICE FOR LONDON Regional Planning Guidance for the South East (RPG 9) March 2001 London: The Stationery Office Government Office for the South East Bridge House 1 Walnut Tree Close Guildford GU1 4GA Telephone 01483 884824 or 882516 Internet service http://www.go-se.gov.uk/infor/planning-HTML © Crown copyright 2001 Copyright in the typographical arrangement and design vests in the Crown. Extracts of this publication may be made for non-commercial in-house use, subject to the source being acknowledged. Applications for reproduction should be made in writing to The Copyright Unit, Her Majesty’s Stationery Office, St Clements House, 2-16 Colegate, Norwich NR3 1BQ. ISBN 0 11753562 1 Printed in Great Britain for The Stationery Office on material containing 75% post-consumer waste and 25% ECF pulp. March 2001 TJ003602 C15 03/01 9385 14315 Contents Chapter Page 1 Introduction ......................................................................................................... 3 2 Context ................................................................................................................ 5 3 Vision and Key Development Principles .............................................................. 9 4 Core Strategy for the Region ............................................................................. 13 5 Quality of Life in Town and Country ................................................................... 18 6 Environmental Strategy and the Countryside .................................................... 31 7 The Regional Economy ..................................................................................... 39 8 Housing ............................................................................................................. 47 9 Regional Transport Strategy .............................................................................. 55 10 Supply and Development of Other Infrastructure – Water, Waste and Energy ... 72 11 Minerals............................................................................................................. 81 12 Sub-Regional Areas .......................................................................................... 85 13 Implementation, Monitoring and Review ............................................................ 98 Maps 1 The South East Region in Context................................................................... 103 2 Core Strategy .................................................................................................. 104 3 Communications (studies) ............................................................................... 105 4 Environment .................................................................................................... 106 5 Economic Development ................................................................................... 107 6 Administrative Areas........................................................................................ 108 Annex List of Planning Policy Guidance Notes and .................................................... 109 other documents referred to in the text 1 Chapter 1 Introduction 1.1 This Regional Planning Guidance for the South East (RPG9) is provided by the Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and the Regions. It covers the period up to 2016 setting the framework for the longer term future. This guidance supersedes the Regional Planning Guidance for the South East issued in March 1994, which covered the period up to 2011. 1.2 The primary purpose of this guidance is to provide a regional framework for the preparation of local authority development plans and, in London, for the Mayor’s Spatial Development Strategy. Throughout this guidance ‘South East’ refers to the Greater London area and the areas covered by the shire county, unitary and district councils for Bedfordshire, Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, East Sussex, Essex, Hampshire, Hertfordshire, the Isle of Wight, Kent, Oxfordshire, Surrey and West Sussex. 1.3 The other purpose of this guidance is to provide the spatial framework for other strategies and programmes. These include the preparation of local transport plans by local authorities, the regional strategies of the South East of England Development Agency (SEEDA) and East of England Development Agency (EEDA), and the strategies prepared by the Mayor of London including those for economic development and transport. 1.4 This guidance takes account of Government policies as set out in Planning Policy Guidance Notes (PPGs), Minerals Planning Guidance Notes (MPGs), circulars and other Government statements including White Papers. A list is included in the Annex and includes the new PPG11 (Regional Planning) published in October 2000. This RPG should be read in conjunction with the more detailed existing guidance contained in: • Thames Gateway Planning Framework (RPG9a) issued in 1995; • Strategic Guidance for London Planning Authorities (RPG3) issued in 1996 (to be superseded by the Mayor’s Spatial Development Strategy); and • Strategic Planning Guidance for the River Thames (RPG3b/9b) issued in 1997. 1.5 All parts of this guidance must be taken into account by local planning authorities in preparing their development plans and may be material to decisions on individual planning applications and appeals. Preparation of Regional Planning Guidance 1.6 SERPLAN issued A Sustainable Development Strategy for the South East for consultation as Draft RPG9 in December 1998. This was the subject of a Public Examination held by an independent Panel, whose report was published in October 1999. After due consideration of the Panel’s recommendations as well as all the representations made on the Draft RPG, the Secretary of State issued his Proposed Changes to Draft RPG9 and Reasons for the Proposed Changes in March 2000. These were the subject of public consultation over a twelve week period, as a result of which the Secretary of State made further changes which are incorporated in this final guidance. 3 1.7 The process of preparation of this guidance by SERPLAN began prior to the publication of draft Planning Policy Guidance on Regional Planning, Draft PPG11 (Regional Planning) in February 1999. As a result, this guidance, in its present form, does not fully accord with the advice in PPG11 on the scope and format of RPG. In particular, it is insufficiently regionally specific in places and therefore resorts to references to national policy. In order to develop regional policy in a number of aspects, further work will be required as part of the updating and review process. The Secretary of State expects early reviews of this RPG, with advice from the new regional planning bodies, particularly in respect of: • Retail strategy (chapter 5); • Tourism, including links with sport, recreation and cultural facilities (chapter 7); • Housing provision and distribution in the light of monitoring and the results of urban capacity studies and potential growth area studies (chapter 8); • Regional transport strategy (chapter 9); • Waste and renewable energy (chapter 10); • Minerals (chapter 11); and • Monitoring (chapter 13). Regional Planning Bodies and the Mayor of London 1.8 Throughout this guidance reference is made to ‘Regional Planning Bodies and the Mayor of London’. These bodies have responsibility for implementation, monitoring and review of this guidance. They include SERPLAN who are the existing Regional Planning Body, the new Mayor of London and the organisations which will assume responsibility for regional planning in the Government Office regions for the South East and East of England once SERPLAN is wound up in March 2001. Bedfordshire, Essex and Hertfordshire will be joined with Cambridgeshire, Norfolk and Suffolk in a new East of England regional planning body, and the South East of England Regional Assembly will become the new regional planning body for the Government Office South East region. 1.9 The Mayor of London is preparing a Spatial Development Strategy for London. Future reviews of RPG for the Eastern and South East regions are to be based on Government Office boundaries. However, given the economic, transportation and social interdependence of London and the wider South East Region, pan-regional co-ordination arrangements have been agreed between the Greater London Authority and the new regional planning bodies for the South East and East of England regions. 4 Chapter 2 Context 2.1 With around 18.1 million people the South East has the largest regional population in the UK. At its heart lies London, a world city with a population
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Post-Medieval and Modern Resource Assessment
    THE SOLENT THAMES RESEARCH FRAMEWORK RESOURCE ASSESSMENT POST-MEDIEVAL AND MODERN PERIOD (AD 1540 - ) Jill Hind April 2010 (County contributions by Vicky Basford, Owen Cambridge, Brian Giggins, David Green, David Hopkins, John Rhodes, and Chris Welch; palaeoenvironmental contribution by Mike Allen) Introduction The period from 1540 to the present encompasses a vast amount of change to society, stretching as it does from the end of the feudal medieval system to a multi-cultural, globally oriented state, which increasingly depends on the use of Information Technology. This transition has been punctuated by the protestant reformation of the 16th century, conflicts over religion and power structure, including regicide in the 17th century, the Industrial and Agricultural revolutions of the 18th and early 19th century and a series of major wars. Although land battles have not taken place on British soil since the 18th century, setting aside terrorism, civilians have become increasingly involved in these wars. The period has also seen the development of capitalism, with Britain leading the Industrial Revolution and becoming a major trading nation. Trade was followed by colonisation and by the second half of the 19th century the British Empire included vast areas across the world, despite the independence of the United States in 1783. The second half of the 20th century saw the end of imperialism. London became a centre of global importance as a result of trade and empire, but has maintained its status as a financial centre. The Solent Thames region generally is prosperous, benefiting from relative proximity to London and good communications routes. The Isle of Wight has its own particular issues, but has never been completely isolated from major events.
    [Show full text]
  • Front Matter (PDF)
    GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF LONDON MEMOIR No. 2 GEOLOGICAL RESULTS OF PETROLEUM EXPLORATION IN BRITAIN I945-I957 BY NORMAN LESLIE FALCON, M.A.F.1K.S. (CHIEF GEOLOGIST, THE BRITISH PETROLEUM COMPANY LIMITED) AND PERCY EDWARD KENT, D.Sc., Ph.D. (GEOLOGICAL ADVISER, BP EXPLORATXON [CANADA]) LONDON 4- AUGUST, I960 LIST OF PLATES PLATE I, FIG. 1. Hypothetical section through Kingsclere and Faringdon borings. (By R. G. W. BRU~STRO~) 2. Interpretative section through Fordon No. 1. Based on seismic reflection and drilling results, taking into account the probability of faulting of the type exposed in the Howardian Hills Jurassic outcrop. II. Borehole sections in West Yorkshire. (By A. P. TERRIS) III. Borehole sections in the Carboniferous rocks of Scotland. IV. Type column of the Upper Carboniferous succession in the Eakring area, showing lithological marker beds. (By M. W. STI~O~C) V. Structure contour map of the Top Hard (Barnsley) Seam in the Nottinghamshire and Derbyshire Coalfield. Scale : 1 inch to 2 miles. LIST OF TABLES Data from exploration wells, 1945-1957, m-- TABLE I. Southern England and the South Midlands II. The East Midlands III. East and West Yorkshire IV. Lancashire and the West Midlands V. Scotland LIST OF FIGURES IN THE TEXT Page Fig. 1. General map of areas explored to the end of 1957 6 2. Arreton : gravity residuals and reflection contours . 8 Ashdown : seismic interpretation of structure after drilling. Depths shown are of Great Oolite below sea,level 9 4. Mesozoic borehole sections in southern England 10 5. Faringdon area : gravity residuals and seismic refraction structure 14 6.
    [Show full text]
  • Partnership for South Hampshire – Statement of Common Ground 1
    Partnership for South Hampshire – Statement of Common Ground 1. Introduction 2. Background 3. Content a. a short written description and map showing the location and administrative areas covered by the statement, and a brief justification for these area(s); b. the key strategic matters being addressed by the statement, for example meeting the housing need for the area, air quality etc.; c. the plan-making authorities responsible for joint working detailed in the statement, and list of any additional signatories (including cross-referencing the matters to which each is a signatory); d. governance arrangements for the cooperation process, including how the statement will be maintained and kept up to date; e. if applicable, the housing requirements in any adopted and (if known) emerging strategic policies relevant to housing within the area covered by the statement; f. distribution of needs in the area as agreed through the plan-making process, or the process for agreeing the distribution of need (including unmet need) across the area; g. a record of where agreements have (or have not) been reached on key strategic matters, including the process for reaching agreements on these; and h. any additional strategic matters to be addressed by the statement which have not already been addressed, including a brief description how the statement relates to any other statement of common ground covering all or part of the same area. 4. Signatories 1. Introduction 1.1. The Partnership for South Hampshire (PfSH) – formerly the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) – was originally formed in 2003. It is a partnership of district and unitary authorities, together with a county council and national park authority, working together to support the sustainable economic growth of the South Hampshire sub-region.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Communities in Hampshire Masterplanning for Delivery Peter Frankum – Savills Urban Design Studio
    Building communities in Hampshire Masterplanning for delivery Peter Frankum – Savills Urban Design Studio savills.com Content The Hampshire context . The pressure for growth . Emerging solutions . Historic growth of settlements . Local identity Implementation . Examples Lessons learnt Hampshire context Basingstoke Andover Winchester Southampton Eastleigh Fareham Havant Gosport Portsmouth urban centres The challenge – the pressure for growth Understanding the place and delivering quality The challenge • Pressure for growth • Getting the right design response • Hampshire specific and local identity • Responding to local issues • Understanding constraints • Obtaining local buy in/ ownership • Ensuring quality is a priority • Viable and sustainable change • Quality places – the lasting legacy Typical issues • Setting out clear evidence based advice • Quality of skills/ resources in placemaking • Available, clear and constructive guidance • Ensuring development should respond to site and context • Avoid one solution fits all policies and designs • Poorly designed places (unwelcoming) • Poor access to transport, facilities, jobs • Unviable development areas • Avoiding short-term development and places • Is quality still a priority over other pressures for development? ‘…there is no there there….’ Gertrude Stein The pressure for growth in Hampshire Policy and housing delivery Local Plans •38% of LPAs in Hampshire have a post NPPF plan •Current adopted plans have a total housing requirement of 6,068 •Average housing delivery across Hampshire over
    [Show full text]
  • Peat Database Results Hampshire
    Baker's Rithe, Hampshire Record ID 29 Authors Year Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 6926 1041 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Preserved timbers (oak and yew) on peat ledge. One oak stump in situ. Peat layer 0.15-0.26 m deep [thick?]. Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available -1 m OD Yes Notes 14C details ID 12 Laboratory code R-24993/2 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description [-1 m OD] Oak stump Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3735 ± 60 BP 2310-1950 cal. BC Notes Stump BB Bibliographic reference Allen, M. and Gardiner, J. 2000 'Our changing coast; a survey of the intertidal archaeology of Langstone Harbour, Hampshire', Hampshire CBA Research Report 12.4 Coastal peat resource database (Hazell, 2008) Page 1 of 86 Bury Farm (Bury Marshes), Hampshire Record ID 641 Authors Year Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 Location description Deposit location SU 3820 1140 Deposit description Deposit stratigraphy Associated artefacts Early work Sample method Depth of deposit 14C ages available Yes Notes 14C details ID 491 Laboratory code Beta-93195 Sample location Depth of sample Dated sample description SU 3820 1140 -0.16 to -0.11 m OD Transgressive contact. Age (uncal) Age (cal) Delta 13C 3080 ± 60 BP 3394-3083 cal. BP Notes Dark brown humified peat with some turfa. Bibliographic reference Long, A., Scaife, R. and Edwards, R. 2000 'Stratigraphic architecture, relative sea-level, and models of estuary development in southern England: new data from Southampton Water' in ' and estuarine environments: sedimentology, geomorphology and geoarchaeology', (ed.s) Pye, K.
    [Show full text]
  • 129 Stoke Road, Gosport, PO12
    129 Stoke Road, Gosport, PO12 1SD Investment Summary Gosport is an established coastal town situated on a peninsular to the west of Portsmouth Harbour and the city of Portsmouth. Located 0.5 miles west of Gosport town centre and 6.3 miles south of junction 11 of the M27. Let to the substantial 5A 1 Dun & Bradstreet covenant of Waitrose Limited until 16th July 2025 (5.83 years unexpired). Waitrose have been in occupation since 1973. Passing rent of £220,000 per annum (£9.19) with a fixed uplift to £250,000 (£10.44) in July 2020. Large site area of 0.88 acres. Potential to consider long term redevelopment of the site, subject to necessary planning consent. The adjoining building 133 Stoke Road has permission under permitted development to be converted to 18 one-bedroom residential flats. We are instructed to seek offers in excess of £2,500,000 (Two Million Five Hundred Thousand Pounds), subject to contract and exclusive of VAT. A purchase at this level reflects anet initial yield of 8.27%, a reversionary yield of 9.40% (July 2020) and after purchaser costs of 6.38%. 129 Stoke Road, Gosport, PO12 1SD Petersfield M3 A32 A3057 Eastleigh A3 M27 B3354 Droxford SOUTHAMPTON South Downs AIRPORT National Park M271 B2150 Location A32 A334 SOUTHAMPTON Hedge End Gosport is a coastal town in South Hampshire, situated on a A3(M) Wickham peninsular to the west of Portsmouth Harbour and the city of Waterlooville Portsmouth to which it is linked by the Gosport Ferry. Hythe M27 A326 A27 The town is located approximately 13 miles south west of Fareham A27 Portsmouth, 19 miles south east of Southampton and 6 miles south Havant Titchfield Portchester Cosham east of Fareham.
    [Show full text]
  • Introducing a South Hampshire Green Belt
    Rpep INTRODUCING A SOUTH HAMPSHIRE GREEN BELT Exploring the socioeconomic and environmental value ubtitle: use to expand on main title – up to 90 characters or about two lines New Economics Foundation Introducing a South Hampshire Green Belt Introducing a South Hampshire Green Belt Exploring the socioeconomic and environmental value Published June 2020 Authors: William Davies, Jasmeet Phagoora Client: CPRE Hampshire, The Countryside Charity The consultancy of the New Economics Foundation, NEF Consulting helps put new economics into practice with people and the planet at the heart of decision-making. The New Economics Foundation is the UK’s leading think . tank promoting social, economic, and environmental justice to transform the economy so that it works for people and the planet. The contents of this report can be shared freely within the organisation named above as the client. Please contact us if you would like to publish the report, or extracts from it, on a website or in any other way. Unless explicitly agreed otherwise, all publishing rights remain with NEF Consulting. NEF Consulting Limited New Economics Foundation 10 Salamanca Place, London SE1 7HB www.nefconsulting.com Tel: 020 7820 6300 2 Introducing a South Hampshire Green Belt CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ...................................................................................................... 5 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................. 7 What is a Green Belt and why is it important?
    [Show full text]
  • The Primary Care Pharmacy Team Wish You a Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year
    The Primary Care Pharmacy Team Wish You a Merry Christmas And a Happy New Year This bulletin contains information about the following topics: Page 1. Reminder to patients – Christmas prescription requests 2 2. Have you updated your NHS Choices profile for Xmas 2 3. Controlled Drugs Requisitions forms 3 4. CD prescribing – recommended quantity 3 5. Provision of current pharmacy email address 3 6. Patient Returned Medicines 4 7. New member of Primary Care Pharmacy Team 4 8. Useful Contacts 5 1 Reminder to patients – Christmas prescriptions requests The Christmas and New Year period is one of the busiest of the year. Please help patients by making sure that you remind them to request their repeat prescription in plenty of time to ensure that they do not run out of medication over the holiday period. Have you updated your NHS Choices profile with your Christmas opening hours? NHS Choices is the online presence for the NHS, providing the public with access to searchable databases of NHS providers to help them locate their nearest healthcare provider, including community pharmacies. As such your NHS Choices profile may provide the first impression of your pharmacy to members of the public and so it is vital to ensure it is kept up-to- date, and that you have updated the profile with regular opening hours. It is also worth adding in any variations to those hours, such as reminders of which days you will be closed over Christmas and the New Year holiday period. Don’t forget, utilising this free resource could also help promote your pharmacy by letting potential patients know of the services you offer as well as other useful information such as car parking arrangements.
    [Show full text]
  • Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a Resource Assessment
    Neolithic to Early Bronze Age Buckinghamshire: a resource assessment Inheritance Mobility Although Neolithic populations are thought to have had continued mobility, more and more evidence for Neolithic settlement has come to light. In Buckinghamshire the most important evidence comes from excavations in advance of the construction of Eton Rowing Course (ERC) and the Maidenhead to Windsor and Eton Flood Alleviation Scheme (MWEFAS), mainly in the parish of Dorney in South Bucks on the Thames. The evidence points to intensive use of the area by people in the Early Neolithic but it is not certain that it represents year-round sedentary occupation rather than seasonal re-use (Allen et al 2004). Other evidence does point to continued mobility, such as the artefact scatters at Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham (Mitchell 2004) and East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990) for example, reflecting visits over a long period of time. Persistent places Mesolithic persistent places continue to have meaning for Early and later Neolithic populations. These persistent places include East Street, Chesham (Collard 1990, 18) and Late Neolithic to Early Bronze Age activity at Chessvale Bowling Club nearby (Halsted 2006, 23-8). Another persistent place seems to have been the lower reaches of the River Colne. Recent excavations at the Sanderson Site, Denham (Halsey 2005) continued the activity from nearby Three Ways Wharf, Uxbridge (Lewis 1991). Other persistent places include the attractive river valley location at Bancroft in Milton Keynes (Williams 1993, 5), and Scotsgrove Mill, Haddenham, where the River Thame meets one of its tributaries (Mitchell 2004, 1). These persistent places may have been the basis of evolving ideas about land tenure.
    [Show full text]
  • Towards an International City of Culture
    Towards an International City of Culture Southampton City Council Arts and Heritage Strategic Vision Executive Summary This Strategic Vision defines Southampton City Council’s strategic role regarding Arts and Heritage provision within the wider context of the City of Southampton Strategy towards 2026, council priorities, the Southampton Heritage and Arts People initiative (SHAPe), and the sub-regional Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH). Southampton is a thriving and growing city with a diverse and dynamic population. However, these developments are in pockets and other parts of the city (economically, physically, socially) remain significantly deprived. We want to transform Southampton from being a gateway to a place of destination where people want to visit, put down roots and engage in community. The City has a fantastic opportunity over the next twenty years to transform its cultural offer and create an overall vibrant cultural soul, a sense of identity and uniqueness that connects people to each other and to Southampton as place. Its rich cultural makeup, internationally important heritage story and nationally dynamic arts and creative scene provide an inspirational resource for exploitation. The significance of Southampton within the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) regional development area will ensure that this potential can be realised particularly within the context of Living Places. Culture is critical to Southampton’s economic development, health and wellbeing and the creation of an attractive image of the city as a place in which people want to live, work and play. Without a vibrant cultural soul, Southampton becomes a divided, anonymous, modern and transient settlement with little civic pride or unique sense of place, and without an attractive, sustainable and stimulating environment that people value.
    [Show full text]
  • South Hampshire Strategy a Framework to Guide Sustainable Development and Change to 2026
    South Hampshire Strategy A framework to guide sustainable development and change to 2026 October 2012 South Hampshire Strategy | October 2012 Foreword Economic development, skills, housing and many other issues cut across local authority boundaries, so it makes sense to address them in partnership across South Hampshire. By doing that, we will help maximise economic growth, bring about a renaissance of Portsmouth, Southampton and other urban areas, and ensure affordable family homes and good quality jobs for all. This document articulates the vision for South Hampshire‟s future and sets out the strategy to align policies, actions and decisions with that overall vision. It has been prepared by the Partnership for Urban South Hampshire (PUSH) with the close involvement of the Leaders, chief executives and other officers of all ten authorities which are wholly or partly within the PUSH area. It is an aspirational document which echoes the PUSH Economic Development Strategy in seeking a step change in South Hampshire‟s economic growth in a managed, sustainable way, with the growth shared by all communities. It reflects PUSH‟s track record of innovation in areas such as skills, housing and spatial planning, and underlines the credibility of the Partnership‟s submission to Government under the „Unlocking growth in cities‟ initiative. This is not a statutory plan; rather it provides a framework to inform and support the preparation of statutory local plans and the future review/roll forward of those which are already adopted. Its preparation jointly by the PUSH authorities largely fulfils the „duty to cooperate‟ on planning issues which is placed on them by the Localism Act.
    [Show full text]
  • South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034)
    South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy (2017 - 2034) Adopted March 2017 (Updated July 2018) South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy 2017 - 2034 Contents Figure i: South Hampshire part of the PUSH Sub-Region: ......................................................................... 1 1. Introduction...................................................................................................................................... 2 1.1 Background and Purpose of the South Hampshire Green Infrastructure Strategy ........................... 2 1.2 The Benefits of a Green Infrastructure Approach ......................................................................... 5 2. Drivers for a strategic GI approach ................................................................................................... 12 2.1 National Planning Policy ........................................................................................................... 12 2.2 25 Year Environment Plan ........................................................................................................ 14 2.3 PUSH Spatial Position Statement 2016 ...................................................................................... 14 2.4 Solent, New Forest and River Itchen European Protected Sites ................................................... 17 2.5 Protected Landscapes .............................................................................................................. 19 3. A GI Strategy for South Hampshire ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]