DAVID MAIER Department of Computer Science Portland
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
The Relationship Between Institutional Common Ownership, Marketing, and Firm Performance
What if Your Owners Also Own Other Firms in Your Industry? The Relationship between Institutional Common Ownership, Marketing, and Firm Performance John Healey 1 Ofer Mintz 2 May 2021 Forthcoming in International Journal of Research in Marketing (IJRM) 1 John Healey ([email protected]) is Assistant Professor of Marketing, A.B. Freeman School of Business, Tulane University, New Orleans, LA. 2 Ofer Mintz ([email protected]) is Senior Lecturer and Associate Head (External Engagement) of the Marketing Department at the UTS Business School, and Research Associate at the UTS Australia-China Relations Institute, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia. Both authors contributed equally to the paper and are listed alphabetically. They are grateful for detailed feedback provided by Peter Danaher and Gerard Hoberg, and participants at the University of Adelaide, and at the 2017 UTS Marketing Discipline Group Research Camp, 2018 Winter American Marketing Association, 2018 Theory and Practice in Marketing, 2018 Marketing Science, and 2019 Marketing Meets Wall Street conferences. Further, they thank Yang Wang for her help with database programming. What if Your Owners Also Own Other Firms in Your Industry? The Relationship between Institutional Common Ownership, Marketing, and Firm Performance Abstract The growth in institutional holdings of public firms has led to increased interest in the concept of common ownership, in which the same investor owns stakes in multiple firms within the same industry. Economic theory suggests that common ownership could affect firm performance, but little empirical research has examined the nature of this effect or how a firm’s extant marketing potentially relates to this effect. -
List of Marginable OTC Stocks
List of Marginable OTC Stocks @ENTERTAINMENT, INC. ABACAN RESOURCE CORPORATION ACE CASH EXPRESS, INC. $.01 par common No par common $.01 par common 1ST BANCORP (Indiana) ABACUS DIRECT CORPORATION ACE*COMM CORPORATION $1.00 par common $.001 par common $.01 par common 1ST BERGEN BANCORP ABAXIS, INC. ACETO CORPORATION No par common No par common $.01 par common 1ST SOURCE CORPORATION ABC BANCORP (Georgia) ACMAT CORPORATION $1.00 par common $1.00 par common Class A, no par common Fixed rate cumulative trust preferred securities of 1st Source Capital ABC DISPENSING TECHNOLOGIES, INC. ACORN PRODUCTS, INC. Floating rate cumulative trust preferred $.01 par common $.001 par common securities of 1st Source ABC RAIL PRODUCTS CORPORATION ACRES GAMING INCORPORATED 3-D GEOPHYSICAL, INC. $.01 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common ABER RESOURCES LTD. ACRODYNE COMMUNICATIONS, INC. 3-D SYSTEMS CORPORATION No par common $.01 par common $.001 par common ABIGAIL ADAMS NATIONAL BANCORP, INC. †ACSYS, INC. 3COM CORPORATION $.01 par common No par common No par common ABINGTON BANCORP, INC. (Massachusetts) ACT MANUFACTURING, INC. 3D LABS INC. LIMITED $.10 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common ABIOMED, INC. ACT NETWORKS, INC. 3DFX INTERACTIVE, INC. $.01 par common $.01 par common No par common ABLE TELCOM HOLDING CORPORATION ACT TELECONFERENCING, INC. 3DO COMPANY, THE $.001 par common No par common $.01 par common ABR INFORMATION SERVICES INC. ACTEL CORPORATION 3DX TECHNOLOGIES, INC. $.01 par common $.001 par common $.01 par common ABRAMS INDUSTRIES, INC. ACTION PERFORMANCE COMPANIES, INC. 4 KIDS ENTERTAINMENT, INC. $1.00 par common $.01 par common $.01 par common 4FRONT TECHNOLOGIES, INC. -
Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing
Emerging Technologies Multi/Parallel Processing Mary C. Kulas New Computing Structures Strategic Relations Group December 1987 For Internal Use Only Copyright @ 1987 by Digital Equipment Corporation. Printed in U.S.A. The information contained herein is confidential and proprietary. It is the property of Digital Equipment Corporation and shall not be reproduced or' copied in whole or in part without written permission. This is an unpublished work protected under the Federal copyright laws. The following are trademarks of Digital Equipment Corporation, Maynard, MA 01754. DECpage LN03 This report was produced by Educational Services with DECpage and the LN03 laser printer. Contents Acknowledgments. 1 Abstract. .. 3 Executive Summary. .. 5 I. Analysis . .. 7 A. The Players . .. 9 1. Number and Status . .. 9 2. Funding. .. 10 3. Strategic Alliances. .. 11 4. Sales. .. 13 a. Revenue/Units Installed . .. 13 h. European Sales. .. 14 B. The Product. .. 15 1. CPUs. .. 15 2. Chip . .. 15 3. Bus. .. 15 4. Vector Processing . .. 16 5. Operating System . .. 16 6. Languages. .. 17 7. Third-Party Applications . .. 18 8. Pricing. .. 18 C. ~BM and Other Major Computer Companies. .. 19 D. Why Success? Why Failure? . .. 21 E. Future Directions. .. 25 II. Company/Product Profiles. .. 27 A. Multi/Parallel Processors . .. 29 1. Alliant . .. 31 2. Astronautics. .. 35 3. Concurrent . .. 37 4. Cydrome. .. 41 5. Eastman Kodak. .. 45 6. Elxsi . .. 47 Contents iii 7. Encore ............... 51 8. Flexible . ... 55 9. Floating Point Systems - M64line ................... 59 10. International Parallel ........................... 61 11. Loral .................................... 63 12. Masscomp ................................. 65 13. Meiko .................................... 67 14. Multiflow. ~ ................................ 69 15. Sequent................................... 71 B. Massively Parallel . 75 1. Ametek.................................... 77 2. Bolt Beranek & Newman Advanced Computers ........... -
Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Architectures
NEW DIRECTIONS I Scalable Shared-Memory Multiprocessor Architectures New coherence schemes scale beyond single-bus-based, shared-memory architectures. This report describes three research efforts: one multiple-bus-based and two directory-based schemes. Introduction Shreekant Thakkar, Sequent Computer Systems Michel Dubois, University of Southern California Anthony T. Laundrie and Gurindar S. Sohi, University of Wisconsin-Madison There are two forms of shared-memory the bus as a broadcast medium to maintain interconnection. The following “coher- multiprocessor architectures: bus-based coherency; all the processors “snoop” on ence properties” form the basis for most of systems such as Sequent’s Symmetry, the bus to maintain coherent information in these schemes: Encore’s Multimax, SGI’s Iris, and Star- the caches. The protocols require the data Sharing readers. Identical copies of a dent’s Titan; and switching network-based in other caches to be invalidated or updated block of data may be present in several systems such as BBN’s Butterfly, IBM’s on a write by a processor if multiple copies caches. These caches are called readers. RP3, and New York University’s Ultra. of the modified data exist. The bus pro- Exclusive owners. Only one cache at a Because of the efficiency and ease of the vides free broadcast capability, but this - time may have permission to write to a shared-memory programming model, feature also limits its bandwidth. block of data. This cache is called the these machines are more popular for paral- New coherence schemes that scale be- owner. lel programming than distributed multi- yond single-bus-based, shared-memory processors such as NCube or Intel’s iPSC. -
Lacrosse Footwear, Inc
LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC. NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS To Be Held April 27, 2009 To: The Shareholders of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.: NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the annual meeting of shareholders of LaCrosse Footwear, Inc. will be held on Monday, April 27, 2009, at 3:00 P.M., Eastern Time, at LaCrosse Footwear, Inc.’s Distribution Center, 5352 Performance Way, Whitestown, Indiana, 46075 for the following purposes: 1. To elect three directors to hold office until the 2012 annual meeting of shareholders and until their successors are duly elected and qualified; 2. To consider and act upon such other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. The close of business on February 27, 2009, has been fixed as the record date for the determination of shareholders entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. A proxy for the meeting and a proxy statement are enclosed herewith. By Order of the Board of Directors LACROSSE FOOTWEAR, INC. David P. Carlson Secretary Portland, Oregon March 27, 2009 Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting of Shareholders to Be Held on April 27, 2009. Pursuant to new rules promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or the SEC, we have elected to provide access to our proxy materials both by sending you this full set of proxy materials, including a notice of annual meeting, and 2008 Annual Report to Shareholders, and by notifying you of the availability of our proxy materials on the Internet. -
Candidate for President (1 July 2018 – 30 June 2020) Jack Davidson
Candidate for President (1 July 2018 – 30 June 2020) Jack Davidson Professor of Computer Science University of Virginia Charlottesville, VA U.S.A. BIOGRAPHY Education and Employment • B.A.S. (Computer Science) Southern Methodist University, 1975; M.S. (Computer Science) Southern Methodist University, 1977; Ph.D. (Computer Science) University of Arizona, 1981. • University of Virginia, Professor, 1982–present. • President, Zephyr Software, 2001–present. • Princeton University, Visiting Professor, 1992–1993. • Microsoft Research, Visiting Researcher, 2000–2001. • Programmer Analyst III, University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas, 1993–1997. ACM and SIG Activities • ACM member since 1975. • ACM Publications Board Co-Chair, 2010–present; ACM Publications Board member, 2007–2010. • ACM Student Chapter Excellence Award Judge, 2010–2017. • ACM Student Research Competition Grand Finals Judge, 2011–2017. • Associate Editor, ACM TOPLAS, 1994–2000. Associate Editor, ACM TACO, 2005–2016. Member of SIGARCH, SIGBED, SIGCAS, SIGCSE, and SIGPLAN • SIGPLAN Chair, 2005–2007. • SIGPLAN Executive Committee, 1999–2001, 2003–2005. • SGB Representative to ACM Council, 2008–2010. • SGB Executive Committee, 2006–2008. Awards and Honors • DARPA Cyber Grand Challenge Competition, 2nd Place, $1M prize (2016) • ACM Fellow (2008). • IEEE Computer Society Taylor L. Booth Education Award (2008). • UVA ACM Student Chapter Undergraduate Teaching Award (2000). • NCR Faculty Innovation Award (1994). Jack Davidson’s research interests include compilers, computer architecture, system software, embedded systems, computer security, and computer science education. He is co-author of two introductory textbooks: C++ Program Design: An Introduction to Object Oriented Programming and Java 5.0 Program Design: An Introduction to Programming and Object-oriented Design. Professionally, he has helped organize many conferences across several fields. -
David C. Parkes John A
David C. Parkes John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, Harvard University, 33 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA www.eecs.harvard.edu/~parkes December 2020 Citizenship: USA and UK Date of Birth: July 20, 1973 Education University of Oxford Oxford, U.K. Engineering and Computing Science, M.Eng (first class), 1995 University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia, PA Computer and Information Science, Ph.D., 2001 Advisor: Professor Lyle H. Ungar. Thesis: Iterative Combinatorial Auctions: Achieving Economic and Computational Efficiency Appointments George F. Colony Professor of Computer Science, 7/12-present Cambridge, MA Harvard University Co-Director, Data Science Initiative, 3/17-present Cambridge, MA Harvard University Area Dean for Computer Science, 7/13-6/17 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Harvard College Professor, 7/12-6/17 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Gordon McKay Professor of Computer Science, 7/08-6/12 Cambridge, MA Harvard University John L. Loeb Associate Professor of the Natural Sciences, 7/05-6/08 Cambridge, MA and Associate Professor of Computer Science Harvard University Assistant Professor of Computer Science, 7/01-6/05 Cambridge, MA Harvard University Lecturer of Operations and Information Management, Spring 2001 Philadelphia, PA The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Research Intern, Summer 2000 Hawthorne, NY IBM T.J.Watson Research Center Research Intern, Summer 1997 Palo Alto, CA Xerox Palo Alto Research Center 1 Other Appointments Member, 2019- Amsterdam, Netherlands Scientific Advisory Committee, CWI Member, 2019- Cambridge, MA Senior Common Room (SCR) of Lowell House Member, 2019- Berlin, Germany Scientific Advisory Board, Max Planck Inst. Human Dev. Co-chair, 9/17- Cambridge, MA FAS Data Science Masters Co-chair, 9/17- Cambridge, MA Harvard Business Analytics Certificate Program Co-director, 9/17- Cambridge, MA Laboratory for Innovation Science, Harvard University Affiliated Faculty, 4/14- Cambridge, MA Institute for Quantitative Social Science International Fellow, 4/14-12/18 Zurich, Switzerland Center Eng. -
Acm Council on Women Hails Innovator in Information Retrieval
Contact: Virginia Gold 212-626-0505 [email protected] ACM COUNCIL ON WOMEN HAILS INNOVATOR IN INFORMATION RETRIEVAL Microsoft Research’s Dumais Changed the Way People Search for Information NEW YORK, April 8, 2014 – ACM-W (the Association for Computing Machinery’s Council on Women in Computing) today named Susan T. Dumais of Microsoft Research as the 2014-2015 Athena Lecturer. Dumais introduced novel algorithms and interfaces for interactive retrieval that have made it easier for people to find, use and make sense of information. Her research, at the intersection of human-computer interaction and information retrieval, has broad applications for understanding and improving searching and browsing from the Internet to the desktop. The Athena Lecturer award celebrates women researchers who have made fundamental contributions to computer science. It includes a $10,000 honorarium provided by Google Inc. “Dumais has helped us understand that the search is not the end goal,” said Mary Jane Irwin, who heads the ACM-W awards committee. “Her focus is on understanding when and why people search, and presenting results in context to help integrate those results into the larger search process. Her sustained contributions have shaped the thinking and direction of human-computer interaction and information retrieval, and influenced generations of student interns through collaborative projects with academic and industry partners.” Dumais’ initial research demonstrated that different people use different vocabulary to describe the same thing, and that this mismatch limits the success of traditional keyword-based information retrieval methods. To build search systems that avoided the vocabulary problem, she and her colleagues invented Latent Semantic Indexing (LSI). -
ACM JDIQ) October 31, 2006
PROPOSAL FOR A NEW ACM PUBLICATION: ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality (ACM JDIQ) October 31, 2006 Contacts for the proposed ACM Journal of Data and Information Quality (ACM JDIQ) Dr. Yang Lee Phone and email: MIS-EIC (617) 373-5052 Associate Professor (617) 739-9367 (fax) College of Business Administration [email protected] Northeastern University 214 Hayden Hall 360 Huntington Avenue Boston, MA 021115-5000 Dr. Stuart Madnick Phone and email: CS-EIC (617) 253-6671 J N Maguire Professor of Information Technology and (617) 253-3321 (fax) Professor of Engineering Systems [email protected] Massachusetts Institute of Technology Room E53-321 Cambridge, MA 02142 Dr. Elizabeth Pierce Phone and email: Managing Editor (501) 569-3488 Associate Professor (501) 569-7049 (fax) Department of Information Science [email protected] University of Arkansas at Little Rock ETAS Building, Room 258 2801 South University Avenue Little Rock, Arkansas 72204 1. JUSTIFICATION 1.1 Background for this Proposal Today’s organizations are increasingly investing in technology to collect, store, and process vast volumes of data. Even so, they often find themselves stymied in their efforts to translate this data into meaningful insights that can be used to improve business processes and to make better decisions. The reasons for this difficulty can often be traced to issues of quality. These involve both technical issues, such as that the data collected may be inconsistent, inaccurate, incomplete, or out-of-date as well as the fact that many organizations lack a cohesive strategy across the enterprise to ensure that the right stakeholders have the right information in the right format at the right place and time. -
The Evolution of the Computerized Database
The Evolution of the Computerized Database Nancy Hartline Bercich Advisor: Dr. Don Goelman Completed: Spring 2003 Department of Computing Sciences Villanova University Villanova, Pennsylvania U.S.A. Database History What is a database? Elsmari and Navathe [ELS00] define a database as a collection of related data. By this definition, a database can be anything from a homemaker’s metal recipe file to a sophisticated data warehouse. Of course, today when we think of databases we seldom think of a simple box of cards. We invariably think of computerized data and their DBMS (database management systems). Non Computerized Databases My first experience with a serious database was in 1984. Asplundh was installing Cullinet’s IDMS/R™ (Integrated Relational Data Management System) manufacturing system in the company’s three manufacturing facilities. When first presented with the idea of a computerized database keeping track of inventory and the manufacturing process, the first plant manager’s response was, “ Why do we need that? We already have a system. We already have a method for keeping track of our inventory and manufacturing process and we like our method. Why change it?” He retrieved, from a metal filing cabinet, several boxes containing thousands of index cards. Each index card recorded data on a specific part, truck, manufacturing process or supplier. He already had a database, a good database that quite possibly predated the modern computer. In the end our task we easy. We simply mechanized his existing database. Flat File Storage Before the advent of modern database technology computerized data was primarily stored in flat files of varying formats, ISAM (Indexed Sequential Access Method) and VSAM (Virtual Storage Access Method) being two of the more common file formats of the time. -
SIGCHI Executive Committee Meeting Notes 2014/10
SIGCHI EC agenda Honolulu, Hawaii, USA October 911, 2014 October 9 Gerrit van der Veer, Allison Druin, Philippe Palanque, Rob Jacob, Fred Sampson, Gary Olson, Scooter Morris, Patrick Kelley, Zhengjie Liu, Ashley Cozzi, John Thomas, Jonathan Lazar, Dan Olsen Apologies: Elizabeth Churchill, Jenny Preece, John Karat, Jofish Kaye, Kia Hook, Tuomo Kujala Various Issues: ● Sig Governing Board retiree task force (and JohnT’s suggestion) ○ Draft from Jonathan Grudin, Ron Baecker, John Thomas: Seniors for CHI, CHI for Seniors Ron Baecker, Jonathan Grudin, John Thomas Gerrit to send email to ECDONE Gerrit needs some feedback to bring to SIG Governing Board ● One of the SIGs have been developing “Playing cards of notable women in computing” This will be a kickstarter project, launching very soon (at Grace Hopper?) Details: http://www.cs.duke.edu/csed/wikipedia/cards.html Big: http://www.cs.duke.edu/csed/wikipedia/notableWomenWebPoster.jpg ● Publishing the minutes from the *May* Toronto meeting ○ Allison to work with Fred on redoing Students and Leaders: ● Scholarships ○ Gary Marsden Honoring: ■ Work with/collaborate with University and check with Family ■ Gary Olson to lead this effort & will involve others (Matt Jones, Susan Dray) ○ NEED Conference Scholarships for all SIGCHI sponsored Conferences ■ Scooter to take it to the CMC ● Mentoring ○ John T to chair: Create a lightweight policy for mentoring proposal Allison & Scooter to helpDONE ● Awards ○ Actually looking for nominations (CHI Academy + others) – Nov 15th ○ Patrick to share this info with the rest of the SIGCHI community through social media ○ Rob & Dan to find out awards status from Loren ■ Two Turing awards continuing forward ■ Several ACM Fellows continuing forward ■ This is starting to operate organically within the community. -
Xjoin: a Reactively-Scheduled Pipelined Join Operator
Bulletin of the Technical Committee on DaØa EÒgiÒeeÖiÒg June 2000 Vol. 23 No. 2 IEEE Computer Society Letters LetterfromtheEditor-in-Chief......................................................David Lomet 1 LetterfromtheSpecialIssueEditor......................................................Alon Levy 2 Special Issue on Adaptive Query Processing DynamicQueryEvaluationPlans:SomeCourseCorrections?..............................Goetz Graefe 3 Adaptive Query Processing: Technology in Evolution . ......Joseph M. Hellerstein, Michael J. Franklin, Sirish Chandrasekaran, Amol Deshpande, Kris Hildrum, Sam Madden, Vijayshankar Raman, Mehul A. Shah 7 Adaptive Query Processing for Internet Applications . ............................................... .....................Zachary G. Ives, Alon Y. Levy, Daniel S. Weld, Daniela Florescu, Marc Friedman 19 XJoin: A Reactively-Scheduled Pipelined Join Operator . Tolga Urhan and Michael J. Franklin 27 ADecisionTheoreticCostModelforDynamicPlans..................................Richard L. Cole 34 A Dynamic Query Processing Architecture for Data Integration Systems. ...............................................Luc Bouganim, Franc¸oise Fabret, and C. Mohan 42 Announcements and Notices kcÓÚeÖ ICDE’2001 Call for Papers . .............................................................bac Editorial Board TC Executive Committee Editor-in-Chief Chair David B. Lomet Betty Salzberg Microsoft Research College of Computer Science One Microsoft Way, Bldg. 9 Northeastern University Redmond WA 98052-6399 Boston, MA 02115