Probing planetary-mass primordial black holes with continuous gravitational waves

Andrew L. Miller,1, ∗ S´ebastienClesse,2, † Federico De Lillo,1 Giacomo Bruno,1 Antoine Depasse,1 and Andres Tanasijczuk1 1Universit´ecatholique de Louvain, B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium 2Service de Physique Th´eorique,Universit´eLibre de Bruxelles, Boulevard du Triomphe CP225, B-1050 Brussels, Belgium (Dated: May 25, 2021) Gravitational waves can probe the existence of planetary-mass primordial black holes. Considering −7 −2 a mass range of [10 − 10 ]M , inspiraling primordial black holes could emit either continuous gravitational waves, quasi-monochromatic signals that last for many years, or transient continuous waves, signals whose frequency evolution follows a power law and last for O(hours-months). We show that primordial black hole binaries in our galaxy may produce detectable gravitational waves for different mass functions and formation mechanisms. In order to detect these inspirals, we adapt methods originally designed to search for gravitational waves from asymmetrically rotating neutron stars. The first method, the Frequency-Hough, exploits the continuous, quasi-monochromatic nature of inspiraling black holes that are sufficiently light and far apart such that their orbital frequencies can be approximated as linear with a small spin-up. The second method, the Generalized Frequency- Hough, drops the assumption of linearity and allows the signal frequency to follow a power-law evolution. We explore the parameter space to which each method is sensitive, derive a theoretical sensitivity estimate, determine optimal search parameters and calculate the computational cost of all-sky and directed searches. We forecast limits on the abundance of primordial black holes within our galaxy, showing that we can constrain the fraction of dark matter that primordial black holes −5 −3 compose, fPBH, to be fPBH . 1 for chirp masses between [4 × 10 − 10 ]M for current detectors. −2 For the Einstein Telescope, we expect the constraints to improve to fPBH . 10 for chirp masses −4 −3 between [10 − 10 ]M .

I. INTRODUCTION However, different theories of PBH formation predict a vast range of masses that span several orders of magni- The rates, progenitor masses and low effective spins of tude, e.g. if curvature fluctuations at the origin of PBH the black hole mergers detected by LIGO/Virgo [1–14] formation are nearly scale invariant [22–24, 26, 36] – a have renewed interest in primordial black holes (PBHs) natural prediction of inflation – or come from a broad peak in the PBH power spectrum [37, 38]. The wide in the [1 − 100]M range [15–17]. There exists a vari- ety of PBH formation scenarios, e.g. the gravitational range of possible PBH masses underscores the need to collapse of inhomogeneities that can be generated during develop a variety of methods to probe the existence of inflation, reheating or phase transitions, that allow PBHs PBHs. to compose a fraction [17–20] or all of dark matter in the If the aforementioned theories are correct, the known Universe [15, 16, 21–26]. In addition to being responsible thermal history of the Universe would have left imprints for forming stellar-mass black holes, the collapse process in the PBH mass function [22, 36, 39, 40], independently may also have triggered Baryogenesis in the Universe in of the mechanism responsible for the pre-existing cur- pockets surrounding each PBH, and linked the observed vature fluctuations. In particular, the equation of state baryon-to-photon ratio to the abundance of PBHs at for- of the Universe varies at the Quantum Chromodynam- mation [27, 28]. We refer the reader to [29, 30] for reviews ics transition at ∼ 100 MeV, and at higher energies on PBHs and [31–33] for a summary of recent develop- ∼ 100 GeV when the standard model top quark, W ments. and Z bosons and Higgs boson became non-relativistic. Given the increasing interest for PBHs and novel stel- This transition induces transient variations of the over- density threshold leading to gravitational collapse, easing arXiv:2012.12983v2 [astro-ph.HE] 24 May 2021 lar models to explain the unexpected properties of black hole mergers (e.g. low spins, the masses of GW190814 PBH formation and resulting in two unique features in and GW190521), it is now crucial to find ways to exper- the mass function: (1) a high peak at the solar mass −5 imentally distinguish primordial and astrophysical black scale and (2) two bumps at ∼ 30M and ∼ 10 M . holes. In this context, detecting sub-solar black holes Such a mass function could explain a series of puzzling would almost certainly point to a primordial origin1. observations [21, 22], such as unexpected microlensing events, LIGO/Virgo black hole mergers, spatial corre- lations in the source-subtracted infrared and soft X-ray backgrounds, some properties of dwarf galaxies, and the ∗ [email protected] † [email protected] 1 See however [34, 35] for another sub-solar black hole formation channel, in a particular dark matter scenario, with specific spin predictions. 2 existence of super-massive black holes at high redshifts. the masses of the primordial black a priori, nor do we NANOGrav’s recent observation of a possible stochas- have particular electromagnetic observations to guide us, tic gravitational-wave background at nano-Hertz frequen- targeted searches [69], in which we correct exactly for the cies [41] may also hint a the existence of stellar [26, 42] phase evolution of the signal by knowing its sky location, or planetary-mass PBHs [43]. Moreover, the planetary- frequency and spin-up, are not possible But a directed mass range is specifically motivated by recent detections search [70–73] for PBHs pointing towards a known loca- of star and quasar microlensing events [44–48], suggest- tion, e.g. the galactic center, or where a high concentra- ing that PBHs or compact objects with masses between tion of PBHs could exist, is possible, in which we would −6 −5 10 M and 10 M make up a fraction of the dark search over a range of frequencies and spin-ups of these matter fPBH ∼ O(0.01). This fraction is more than ex- systems. Additionally, an all-sky search [61], where we pected for free-floating planets, but is consistent with assume no knowledge of the signal, is also plausible, since PBHs in the unified scenario presented in [22]. It has even PBHs could be inspiraling anywhere in the sky. Many been recently suggested that the hypothetical Planet 9 continuous-wave methods have already been adapted to −6 could be a PBH of mass ∼ 10 M [49] captured by search for gravitational waves from dark matter candi- the solar system, and detection strategies based on the dates, e.g. the axion, around black holes [74–76], and accretion of small Oort Cloud objects have been pro- dark matter particles that interact directly with the in- posed [50]. However all these observations and their terferometers [77–79]. For planetary-mass PBH insprials, derived limits are subject to large astrophysical uncer- we show that directed searches are more computationally tainties, for instance due to the clustering properties of feasible than all-sky ones, and are still astrophysically in- PBHs [20, 22, 51–54]. It is therefore important to find teresting. a complementary way to probe the existence of such ob- The paper is structured as follows: in section II we jects, and to distinguish PBHs from other sources. describe the expected signal and the accessible parameter In this paper, we show that LIGO/Virgo and the third space. We then explain in section III the main formation generation gravitational-wave detectors, e.g. Einstein channels for PBH mergers and evaluate how likely they Telescope [55–57], can detect gravitational waves from are to happen in the Milky Way. We report the methods nearby galactic PBH binaries. Because their expected to search for these signals in section IV. In section V, we merging rate is several orders of magnitudes larger than perform a sophisticated analysis of the methods, estimate stellar-mass binaries, we show that this novel method the computation time of directed and all-sky searches and could set new limits on the abundance of PBHs in the derive a theoretical estimate of the methods’ sensitivity. planetary-mass range. At such small masses, the inspiral Finally we make some concluding remarks in section VII. phase of the PBH mergers could last for potentially thou- sands years, or hours-months, depending on the chirp mass and orbital frequency. Therefore, from a data anal- II. GRAVITATIONAL WAVES FROM ysis point of view, the signal’s phase evolution is actually INSPIRALS: THE SIGNAL closer to that from asymmetrically rotating neutron stars than from canonical binary system signals. From most The inspiral of two black holes, many orbits away from neutron stars, we expect continuous gravitational waves, the innermost stable circular orbit, can be approximated quasi-monochromatic, quasi-infinite signals, arising from as two point masses in a circular orbit around their center a small deformation on the star’s surface [58–61] or from of mass (see section 4.1 of [66]), whose orbital frequency accretion from a companion star [62]. From newborn ωorb is given by Kepler’s law. When accounting for the neutron stars, we expect transient continuous gravita- loss of orbital energy due to gravitational-wave emission, tional waves, shorter signals, O(hours-days), whose fre- the distance between the two black holes decreases, which quency evolution follows a power law [63, 64]. Both signal means that ωorb increases. Equating the power lost due types are much simpler than those searched for in tra- to gravitational-wave emission with the rate of change of ditional matched filter and burst searches for compact the orbital energy of the system, and knowing that the binaries coalescences, e.g. [65]. Indeed, the inspiral or- gravitational-wave frequency fgw = πωorb we arrive at bital frequency can be modelled as a power law until the [66]: inner-most stable circular orbit, which, for these small masses, occurs at frequencies far outside of the detec- tor sensitivity band (see section II and [66]). Moreover, 96 GM5/3 f˙ = π8/3 f 11/3, (1) when the chirp mass is small enough, the power-law fre- gw 5 c3 gw quency evolution reduces to a linear frequency behavior in time. The simplicity of the signal phase evolution ˙ where fgw is the rate of change of the frequency (the spin- means that transient continuous-wave and continuous- up), M is the chirp mass of the system, c is the speed wave techniques [67, 68] can be applied to search for in- of light, and G is Newton’s gravitational constant. For spiraling planetary-mass PBHs. the most massive PBHs we consider, the gravitational- We can envision performing continuous-wave-like wave frequency at the innermost stable circular orbit is searches for inspiraling PBHs. Since we do not know O(MHz), ensuring that approximation of the inspiral as 3 a circular orbit, and therefore Equation 1 is valid for the full range of LIGO/Virgo frequencies. Equation 1 is a power law, with a braking index n = 11/3 and a constant of proportionality k:

96 GM5/3 −k ≡ π8/3 , (2) 5 c3 where we have written −k to be consistent with our nota- tion in section IV B. This type of signal can be searched for with techniques developed to detect transient con- tinuous waves lasting O(hours-days) that come from remnants of binary neutron star mergers or supernova [80, 81]. Transient continuous waves also follow power laws, but n = 5 or n = 7 for canonical gravitational-wave emission from a deformation [64] or r-modes [82–84], re- spectively, and f˙ is negative. Integrating Equation 1, we obtain the frequency evo- lution:

3 FIG. 1. Time before merger as a function of frequency and  − 8 8 8/3 chirp mass. The widely distributed signal durations in the f (t) = f 1 − kf (t − t ) , (3) gw 0 3 0 0 parameter space imply that different techniques are needed to probe the existence of PBHs at different masses. where t0 is a reference time for the gravitational-wave frequency f0 and t − t0 = tmerg is the time to merger. −5 We also solve equation 3 for tmerg: Only for very small PBH masses (< 2 × 10 M ) can continuous-wave search results actually be used to place constraints on PBH chirp masses. Therefore, continuous- −8/3 3 f −8/3 − f wave searches alone do not adequately cover the parame- t = 0 . (4) merg 8 k ter space associated with PBH mergers, meaning tran- sient continuous-wave methods are necessary to place With some modifications to the existing pipeline in [80], more stringent constraints on a wider range of PBH chirp we can search for signals that follow equation 3. masses. We must also consider the amplitude evolution of the signal over time, which differs from the continuous-wave case [66]: III. PRIMORDIAL BLACK HOLE MERGING RATES  5/3  2/3 4 GM πfgw(t) h(t) = , (5) PBH mergers are a possible source of transient contin- d c2 c uous waves and continuous waves. However, we wish to where d is the distance to the source. evaluate the rates at which these systems will merge to Due to their extremely small masses, PBHs are ex- determine the chance we have to actually see an event. pected to inspiral for very long times compared to typi- There are three possible formation channels of PBH bi- cal LIGO/Virgo binary black hole signals, potentially for naries that would imply different merger rates, which are described in detail in sections III A, III B and III C. months or years. tmerg is shown in Figure 1 as a func- tion of the frequency and chirp mass, which demonstrates We then introduce the considered PBH mass distribution that PBH inspirals are ideal candidates for continuous- functions in section III D, which have a direct impact on wave and transient continuous-wave searches. However, the inspiral rates. depending on the PBH masses, the spin-ups could fall outside of the range typically analyzed in continuous- wave searches [61]. Moreover if Equation 1 cannot be A. Primordial binaries approximated to be linear (see section V A), continuous- wave searches are blind to PBH mergers even if their Before matter-radiation equality in the early universe, spin-ups are small. if two PBHs formed sufficiently close to each other for In Figure 2, we plot the spin-ups associated with cer- their gravitational attraction to overcome the Hubble- tain chirp masses, with the gravitational-wave frequency Lemaˆıtreexpansion of the Universe [17, 85], they form a colored. Superimposed on this plot is the maximum binary whose orbital characteristics depend on the grav- spin-up for which continuous-wave methods search [61]. itational pull from other nearby PBHs. Eventually, the 4

but as shown later, continuous-wave methods are not sen- sitive enough to probe such low values of fPBH. We also note that depending on the PBH mass distribution, the process of rate suppression can be more complex and effi- cient, and therefore dependent, on the binary component masses. This dependence eventually leads to the domi- nance of the second PBH binary formation channel in clusters that we consider later. For planetary-mass mergers, the astrophysical range of continuous-wave searches does not exceed tens of kilopar- secs (see Section V D). One therefore needs to compute the merging rate in the Milky Way. For this purpose, we follow [16] and have assumed an Einasto dark matter halo profile [92], ρ FIG. 2. Spin-up as a function of chirp mass with orbital ρgal (r) = −2 , (7) DM 1/np frequency colored. A green line representing the maximum e2np[(r/r−2) −1] spin-up to which continuous-wave searches have considered is also plotted [61]. Colored points below the green line, mean- where r is the distance to the galactic center, r−2 ≈ 20 ing smaller spin-ups, represent possible masses of inspiral- kpc is the radius at which the logarithmic slope of the −3 −3 ing PBHs that can be probed with continuous-wave methods. profile equals −2 and ρ−2 ≡ ρ(r−2) ≈ 2 × 10 M pc , The maximum chirp mass of a PBH merger that we could de- and np = 4 is a parameter of the profile. Other pro- −4 tect with continuous-wave methods is ∼ 5 × 10 M . Tran- files (e.g. Navarro-Frenk-White - NFW) could have been sient continuous gravitational-wave methods are necessary to considered but without significantly impacting our pre- exhaustively constrain larger PBH chirp masses. dictions. These binaries are formed before galaxy for- mation and so their merging rates only depend on their number density, which is because more black holes in a binary is sufficiently stable and it takes of the order of halo would facilitate the capture of a lone primordial one. the age of the Universe for the two black holes to merge. But binary formation depends only on the total number Assuming that the PBH spatial separation at forma- of black holes existing, not on the local PBH number tion is purely Poissonian, the cosmological merging rate density. With the profile in equation (7), we can then today is approximately given by [86–89]: compute the expected merging rate within our galactic halo, towards the galactic center or in the solar system cos dτ Rprim ≡ vicinity, using the simple relation d ln m1d ln m2 6  −32/37 1.6 × 10 53/37 m1 + m2 Z gal ! gal/GC/sol cos ρ ≈ 3 fsupfPBH DM Gpc yr M Rprim = Rprim × dV, (8) ρ¯DM  −34/37 m1m2 × 2 f(m1)f(m2) , (6) (m1 + m2) whereρ ¯DM is the mean cosmological dark matter density today. For the galactic rate (Rgal ), we considered a vol- where τ is the rate per unit of logarithmic mass of the prim ume of 50 kpc radius; for the galactic center rate (RGC ), two binary black hole components m and m , f prim 1 2 PBH we considered the central region with a 0.1 kpc radius is the dark matter density fraction made of PBHs and that spans an arc of about ten degrees in the sky, simi- f(m) is the density distribution of PBHs normalized to lar to the directional sensitivity in targeted searches with one (R f(m)d ln m = 1). We have included a suppres- LIGO/Virgo. For the solar system vicinity rate (Rsol ), sion factor f [90] that effectively takes into account prim sup i.e. at a distance of 8 kpc from the galactic center, we as- a rate suppression due to the gravitational influence of sumed a constant dark matter density of 2M pc−3, con- early forming PBH clusters [86, 91]. The importance of sistent with the galactic dark matter profile, i.e. 3.3×105 this effect is still uncertain for general PBH mass func- larger than the cosmological dark matter density today. tions. We consider 0.001 . fsup ≤ 1 as a plausible range when fPBH & 0.1 and no suppression (fsup ≈ 1) when 0.005 . fPBH . 0.1, which is motivated by N-body sim- 2 ulations [86] . For lower values of fPBH, the suppression highly suppressed compared to previous calculations [25], an ef- factor becomes lower than one (see e.g. Eq. 2.38 of [86]), fect due to the variation of the Misner-Sharp mass as a function of the Universe expansion that is relevant to calculate the binary collapse time, as long as the binary does not belong to a virial- ized halo. If these results are correct, only binary formation by 2 Nevertheless, when our analysis was almost terminated, a new tidal capture in dense PBH clusters would be relevant for our study has claimed that the rates for primordial binaries are analysis. 5

By integrating equation 8 with the dark matter halo pro- GW190521 with one object in the pair-instability mass file of equation 7, we obtain the following rates: gap, and for other events whose black hole masses were around 30M , while being consistent with LIGO/Virgo gal −8 cos Rprim ≈ 2.2 × 10 × Rprim, (9) sub-solar rate limits [90]. We consider this value as our GC −13 cos benchmark model. Such a value of Rclust. is also mo- Rprim ≈ 1.1 × 10 × Rprim, (10) tivated theoretically when accounting for the enhanced  d 3 Rsol ≈ 1.4 × 10−21 × Rcos , (11) clustering induced by Poisson fluctuations in the initial prim pc prim PBH spatial distribution. This effect introduces a new term in the matter power spectrum, and according to where d is the considered maximal distance of the PBH the extended Press-Schechter formalism, the fraction of binary. Based on Equations 9–11 and the particular inhomogeneities that collapse into halos of mass below mass functions that will be described in section III D, 107M is close to unity for significant values of f , as planetary-mass PBH binaries can reach a yearly rate PBH pointed out in [93] in a different context. Combined with larger than one. Furthermore, for small values of the the low relaxation time of low-mass sub-halos, this sets a chirp mass, one eventually probes lower orbital frequen- natural clustering scale for which one can naturally have cies and the continuous waves are emitted long before R ∼ [100 − 1000]. the binary merger, which can last for many years in the clust. In addition to calculating the merging rates for primor- same frequency band. Therefore the number of primor- dial binaries, we can use equations (9) and (11) for an dial PBH binaries can be larger than one even if the cor- estimation of the rates from PBH clusters in the entire responding merging rate is R  1 yr−1. This number prim galactic halo or in the vicinity of the solar system. For is approximately given by planetary-mass PBH binaries with a mass ratio close to unity, these merging rates are a few orders of magnitudes N gal/GC/sol ≈ Rgal/GC/sol × t . (12) prim prim merg lower than for primordial binaries. However, these rates are boosted for very low mass ratios, for instance if the B. Capture in primordial black hole halos main black hole component has a stellar-mass while the secondary object has a planetary mass. This boost is even more important if there is a peak in the PBH mass The second possible binary formation channel is function at stellar masses, as expected from the thermal through dynamical capture in dense PBH halos [15, 16]. history of the Universe (see Section III D). For this bi- As any other dark matter candidate, PBHs are expected nary formation channel, we will thus focus on the mass to form halos during cosmic history. Their clustering function accounting for the thermal history. properties determine the corresponding merging rate, which can be O(1−100) yr−1 Gpc−3 for a standard Press- Schechter halo mass function [15]. For realistic extended C. Capture in the Galactic Center mass functions, the abundance, size and evolution of PBH clusters is impacted by several effects: the Pois- Dense PBH clusters in the galactic center are prob- sonian noise at formation, heavy PBH seeds, the shape ably unstable and tidally disrupted by the interactions of the primordial power spectrum, the dynamical heat- with the central super-massive black hole and/or other ing of clusters, hierarchical mergers, cluster evaporation, clusters. It is therefore expected that the PBH density etc. These effects can either boost or suppress the PBH distribution is smoother and follows the dark matter den- merging rates, which are thus largely model-dependent. sity profile, given by equation 7. In the galactic center, Nevertheless, the mass dependence of the rates should re- one has main a typical signature of mergers in clusters. The cos- mological merging rates are approximately given by [90] GC 4n −3 8 ρDM ≈ ρ−2e ≈ 6M pc ≈ 1.8 × 10 ρ¯DM , (14) dτ Rcos ≡ capt d ln m d ln m whereρ ¯DM is the mean cosmological dark matter density 1 2 today. Let us nevertheless notice that the dark matter (m + m )10/7 ≈ R f f(m )f(m ) 1 2 ,(13) density in the galactic center depends on the shape and clust. PBH 1 2 5/7 (m1m2) parameters of the profile. The rate at which binaries form where R is an effective scaling factor that incor- through tidal capture depends on the square of the local clust. PBH density RGC ∝ (ρGC )2 and scales nonlinearly with porates the PBH clustering properties. As discussed capt DM GC −11/7 above, the value of Rclust. is uncertain and model de- the mean relative black hole velocity Rcapt ∝ vrel . pendent, and yet LIGO/Virgo black hole merging rates We can therefore relate the galactic center rate to the can be explained if PBHs constitute a significant frac- cosmological rate of binary formation in clusters through: tion of dark matter. Furthermore, for fPBH = 1, a value −1 −3 Rclust. ≈ 400yr Gpc explains well the rates inferred −11/7 from the recent events GW190425 and GW190814 with (ρGC )2V GC  vGC  RGC ≈ DM rel × Rcos , (15) capt clust 3 clust capt one suspected object in the black hole mass gap, from ρDM ρ¯DMGpc vrel 6

clust GC where ρDM is the density of PBH clusters and V is the considered volume in the galactic center. A value of −1 −3 Rclust ≈ 400yr Gpc corresponds to a cluster density clust 8 of ρDM = 6 × 10 ρ¯DM for a mean relative velocity of clust vrel = 2 km/s. The dynamics in the galactic center is a complex process, but the magnitudes of relative velocities GC should be of order vrel ∼ 10km/s, which leads us to an estimate the expected PBH capture rate:

GC −12 cos Rcapt ∼ 3 × 10 × Rcapt. (16) This estimate is order-of-magnitude, given the different astrophysical uncertainties. Equation 16 implies that the ratio between the galactic center and cosmological rates is roughly one order of magnitude larger for tidal cap- ture than for primordial binary formation, which par- FIG. 3. PBH mass distribution normalized to fPBH = 1, tially compensates for a lower value of Rcos compared for Case 2. This model includes the equation of state re- capt duction effects at the Quantum Chromodynamics transition to Rcos . prim on PBH formation for primordial power spectra with indices ns = 0.95/0.96/0.97 (yellow, red and blue curves). D. Primordial black hole mass functions

The distribution of PBH masses, a.k.a. the PBH mass reduction of the number of relativistic degrees of freedom function, remains largely unknown. We do not expect in the early Universe, following [22]. The resulting PBH a monochromatic mass function (i.e. all PBHs with a mass function is displayed in Figure 3. This spectral single mass) because even in the limiting case of black index is compatible with observational limits and could hole formation due to a sharp peak in the primordial give evidence of PBHs in LIGO/Virgo observations, in power spectrum, PBHs would acquire a wider distribu- particular the masses and rates of the recent mergers tion due to effects related to the critical collapse. And GW190425 and GW190814 with fPBH = 1 (and fsup ∼ for a broad mass function covering the planetary and the 0.01) [90]. Moreover, a value ns & 0.98 or ns . 0.95 stellar-mass ranges, one expects features [22, 36] coming would lead to an overproduction of light or heavy black from the thermal history of the Universe and the tran- holes respectively. Using the full mass distribution, we sient variations of the equation of state that occur when have computed the expected merging rate as a function the different species (e.g. the Higgs boson, top quark, of the binary chirp mass, dτ/d log M, which does not W and Z bosons, protons, neutrons, and pions) become only include equal-mass binaries but also binaries with lower mass ratios. The limits on this scenario are set on non-relativistic. Still, the exact shape depends on the ¯ p underlying primordial power spectrum. the parameter combination fPBH ≡ fPBH fsup. For these reasons, we consider two cases for the PBH For both agnostic and thermal PBH mass functions, mass function: we plot the merging rates and the number of expected Case 1 - Agnostic mass function: For a given PBH binaries as a function of the chirp mass of a PBH bi- ˜ p mass mPBH, we let f(mPBH) ≡ fPBHf(mPBH) fsup be nary system in left- and right-hand panels of figure 4, a free model parameter and consider only almost equal- respectively. These curves assume that dark matter is mass mergers that produce the highest strain, giving a entirely composed of PBHs (fPBH = 1), though they can merging rate” be rescaled for other assumptions of this fraction sim- 2 ply by multiplying by fPBH. The rates for PBH binaries 6  −0.86 cos 1.7 × 10 ˜ mPBH with lower chirp masses are higher compared to those for Rprim(mPBH) ≈ 3 f(mPBH) . Gpc yr M higher chirp masses assuming an agnostic mass function, −4 (17) but exhibit a small peak around 10 M when using the The merging rate roughly scales as 1/mPBH and so one thermal mass function. expects light PBHs to merge more often than heavy ones. It is worth understanding whether the rates of PBH This case can represent sharp peaks in the power spec- mergers at particular distances are detectable with cur- trum, or can be used to estimate an upper bound on the rent and future gravitational-wave detectors. Figure 5 abundance at a given mass of PBHs with an arbitrary shows merger rates (colored) as a function of the dis- mass function. tance reach and the PBH chirp mass. Superimposed on Case 2 - Thermal mass function: The primordial this plot are the solid lines that give the sensitivities, power spectrum of curvature fluctuations at the origin calculated in section V D, of LIGO/Virgo and Einstein of PBH formation is nearly scale-invariant, with a spec- Telescope at particular frequencies to these mergers, and tral index ns = 0.97. We include the features in the mass dashed lines that give the distance at which we would be distribution due to thermal history and the progressive able to detect one PBH inspiraling binary assuming that 7

FIG. 4. Left: Merging rates in the galactic halo (blue lines) and galactic center (red lines) for fPBH = 1, from primordial binaries in Case 1 (dashed lines) and Case 2 (solid lines), and tidal capture in Case 2 (dotted-dashed lines). Right: Expected number of binaries, for the same models and cases, for two typical gravitational-wave frequencies, 10 Hz and 50 Hz, corresponding to the maximal astrophysical range of Einstein Telescope (upper lines) and LIGO/Virgo (lower lines). The rates and number of 2 sources for different PBH fractions are obtained by rescaling by fPBH.

PBHs compose 10% or 100% of dark matter. When the IV. SEARCH METHODS solid line is above the dashed line (of the same color), we are able to detect an inspiraling PBH signal. Our analy- Though there are many different formation channels sis method will be explained in the following sections of for PBHs, our data analysis methods are not explicitly the paper. sensitive to them. Rather, we first endeavor to find a power-law or quasi-monochromatic signals from a par- ticular inspiral, and use that information to derive the rates and to forecast limits on the fraction of dark mat- ter that PBHs could compose. In this way, our analysis is independent of how PBHs form, though in the case of a detection, our results can be interpreted in the context of a wide variety of formation models based on different mass functions. The analysis begins with time-domain strain data. From this data, we take Fast Fourier Transforms of differ- ent durations, TFFT [94, 95], estimate the background us- ing an auto-regressive method, equalize the power spec- trum and select local maxima above a certain threshold θthr = 2.5, chosen as a compromise between sensitiv- ity and computational cost [94]. This process allows us to form a time/frequency “peakmap”, as shown in the left-hand plot of figure 6. The color represents the equal- ized power spectra at each time in a particular frequency band. There is a very strong simulated inspiral signal FIG. 5. PBH merging rates within a sphere of radius d cen- due to an injected inspiraling PBH binary system. These tered on the solar system, for Case 1 with f = 1. The PBH peakmaps are the input to the two methods described colored solid lines represent LIGO/Virgo-O2 (red) and Ein- stein Telescope (ET) sensitivities at 50 Hz and 10 Hz, re- in this section. One method is the Frequency-Hough spectively, for the analyses methods described later in sec- transform that has been designed to detect signals whose tion V D. Dashed and dash-dotted lines correspond to one frequency evolution is linear, discussed in section IV A; binary inspiral at fPBH = 1 and fPBH = 0.1, respectively, for the other is the Generalized Frequency-Hough transform, LIGO/Virgo-O2 (red) at 50 Hz and ET (yellow) at 10 Hz. which is conceptually similar to the Frequency-Hough When the solid curves go above the dashed or dash-dotted transform, but can detect any signal whose frequency lines, we can claim that one binary inspiral at a particular evolution follows a power law, which is explained in chirp mass and distance could be detected by LIGO/Virgo or section IV B. Finally in section IV C, we describe the Einstein Telescope. post-processing steps taken after the Frequency-Hough or Generalized Frequency-Hough is run, which involve 8

1−n selecting significant candidates in each detector and per- where we have also written x0 = f0 . Now, points in forming coincidences between them. the time/x plane are mapped to lines in the x0/k plane, and these two variables translate directly back to f0 and ˙ f0, and therefore M. For inspiraling PBHs, these pa- A. Frequency-Hough Transform rameters allow us to calculate the chirp mass and the gravitational-wave frequency at a particular time before The Frequency-Hough transform [96] searches for con- coalescence. tinuous waves from asymmetrically rotating neutron Note that to transition from searches for neutron stars stars by mapping points in the detector time/frequency spinning down to inspiraling PBHs spinning up, the only plane to lines in the source’s frequency/spin-down plane. modification necessary is to allow k → −k in equation This transformation is done for each sky position. First, 19. the time/frequency peakmap is corrected for the relative The Generalized Frequency-Hough has been developed motion of the earth and source, and then the Frequency- and applied to a search for a long-lived remnant of Hough is performed. The signal model is a Taylor series GW170817 [72] and as a follow-up tool to a machine expansion of the frequency in time, neglecting nonlinear learning-based search for the same system [97]. Though terms: the signal durations analyzed are shorter than canonical continuous waves, the Generalized Frequency-Hough re- quires a large amount of computational power because ˙ f = f0 + f(t − t0), (18) the number of points in the grid in k becomes large in certain portions of the parameter space. These limita- where f is the frequency at time t in the input tions will be discussed further in section V. time/frequency map, and f0 is the intrinsic source fre- We demonstrate that the Generalized Frequency- quency at time t0. As long as the second order spin-down ¨ Hough transform can recover a signal from two inspi- parameter f is small and the observation time is not too raling PBHs. A signal is injected in Hanford data with long, this term can be safely neglected in continuous-wave −3 ¨ parameters f0 = 144.655 Hz with M = 1.0 × 10 M searches, though recently f has been used in a directed for a duration of 20520 s. The peakmap and its General- search [71]. The Frequency-Hough has proven to be very ized Frequency-Hough Transform are shown in left- and sensitive to potential continuous-wave sources anywhere right-hand panels of figure 6, respectively. After the Gen- in the sky [61] and towards the galactic center [70]. eralized Frequency-Hough transform, the signal is well- localized to one x0 and k bin. To create the peakmap, we used T = 32 s. B. Generalized Frequency-Hough Transform FFT

Recently the Frequency-Hough was adapted to search C. Post-processing for signals that last O(hours-days), in which a power-law model for the frequency evolution in time is assumed [80], as opposed to a linear one: We summarize how we determine significant candi- dates, which is done in the same way as in [80, 96]. Af- ter we run either the Frequency-Hough or Generalized f˙ = −kf n, (19) Frequency-Hough transforms, we calculate a detection statistic called the critical ratio (CR), which depends on and its integral over time is: the number count y in a particular x/k bin and the mean µ and standard deviation σ of the Hough map:

f0 f(t) = 1 . (20) n−1
n−1 y − µ 1 + k(n − 1)f (t − t0) CR = . (23) 0 σ Adapting the Frequency-Hough to search for power-law On the basis of the number count and CR, significant signals amounts to transforming the frequencies in the candidates are selected uniformly in f and k. This pro- input time/frequency map first in the following way: cess is repeated for each detector in the network. Then, coincidences are done between the significant candidates x = f 1−n. (21) returned by each detector. If the candidates’ Euclidean distance in the x/k plane is less than three bins away, the Once we have changed coordinates (by substituting equa- candidates are in coincidence and require further study. tion 21 into equation 20), the signal’s frequency evolution This coincidence distance dcoin is defined as: becomes linear in the new space: r |x − x | |k − k | d = 2 1 + 2 1 , (24) x = x0 + k(n − 1)(t − t0), (22) coin δx δk 9

(a) (b)

FIG. 6. The left-hand plot shows the peakmap (time/frequency map), created with TFFT = 32 s, of a strong, rapidly evolving signal, which is the input to the Generalized Frequency-Hough transform. The right-hand plot shows the output of the Generalized Frequency-Hough transform, which is a histogram in the f0/k space of the source. The injection parameters are −22 −6 −8/3 −3 −12 −5/3 h0 = 1 × 10 , f0 = 144.655 Hz, x0 = 1.734 × 10 Hz , M = 10 M , and k = −5.797 34 × 10 Hz . The recovered candidate is in the same bin as the injection.

where x1/ x2 and k1/k2 are the candidate’s parameters can assume the signal’s frequency evolution is linear, for returned by the analysis of the data from detectors 1 and different choices of search parameters. In section V B, we 2, and δx and δk are the bin sizes in x and k, respectively. derive the optimal choice of TFFT and the time to observe To deeply analyze these candidates, we perform the Tobs as a function of the source parameter space, assum- follow-up, described extensively in [80, 96]. From the ing that the source/earth Doppler effect can be corrected initial analysis we have an estimation of the frequency for perfectly. We then explore the computing costs for at a reference time, and the chirp mass. With these directed and all-sky searches for PBH mergers in section two parameters, we know (almost) exactly the frequency V C. Finally we derive an expression for the theoretical evolution of the signal given in equation (3). We can sensitivity of this search in section V D. then correct for the signal’s phase evolution in the time domain, effectively making it monochromatic, and then take longer TFFT to determine if the signal’s CR in- A. Linear approximation versus power law creases. If a coincident candidate does not follow this behavior, we veto it. Because continuous-wave signals are quasi- monochromatic and quasi-infinite, we can integrate over years of data to dig deeply into in the noise and V. ANALYSIS OF SEARCH METHODS provide strong constraints on the presence of asym- metrically rotating neutron stars in our galaxy [61]. The methods presented in section IV have been applied However, the methods to search for power laws are not and tested extensively on canonical continuous-wave and nearly as sensitive as continuous-wave methods, since transient continuous-wave signals from isolated neutron the Fast Fourier Transform lengths they can take are stars. Though the frequency evolution of the signal from limited by significantly higher spin-downs (O(10−3) PBH mergers is governed by the same equations as that Hz/s vs. O(10−9) Hz/s), and the signal lasts for a for neutron stars, the analysis scheme has to be different, shorter duration (hours/days vs. years). It is therefore primarily because the system reaches its maximum spin- worthwhile to ask: for which observation times is the up at the end of its life, not the beginning, in contrast to spin-up in equation 1 essentially constant, meaning that spinning down neutron stars. Our methods also work in the frequency evolution is linear in time? In this way, we two different regimes: one looks for quasi-monochromatic would be able to combine continuous-wave and transient frequencies, the other looks for power laws. Understand- continuous-wave techniques and cover the full parameter ing the ideal technique to use as a function of the param- space with the optimal sensitivity. Here, we define that eter space is important to ensure optimal sensitivity to- the linear approximation succeeds when the difference in wards PBH inspirals. We therefore explain in section V A frequencies calculated in equations 18 and 3 are within the regions of the source parameter space for which we one frequency bin δf = 1/TFFT. 10

Figure 7 shows, for four different Fast Fourier Trans- for the mass range of PBH systems we consider, and de- form lengths TFFT assuming a maximum observation termined, for each set of parameters, the optimal TFFT time of one year, the times at which the linear approxima- and Tobs to use in a search. These choices are shown tion fails, tfail, in the gravitational-wave frequency/chirp in figure 8, fixing a maximum observation time of one mass parameter space. Typical continuous-wave searches year. For small chirp mass at low frequencies, the signal employ TFFT = 1024 − 8192 s [61], while searches for is essentially monochromatic and close to a fully coher- transient continuous waves use TFFT = 1 − 16 s [72]. It ent analysis can be performed (bottom left-hand corner is clear that a significant portion of the parameter space of figure 8) if computational cost were not a concern. is not covered by continuous-wave searches, motivating However, for most of the parameter space, semi-coherent the use of other methods to look for PBHs. White space analyses such as the Frequency-Hough and Generalized in each plot corresponds to parameters for which the lin- Frequency-Hough are necessary. Additionally, we see in ear approximation never fails during the maximum ob- the top-right hand corner that it is better to cut off the servation time of one year. Above the green line corre- observation time at, say, one hour and use TFFT ∼ 20 sponds to points in the parameter space for which Tobs s, than to continue to analyze data for longer periods of exceeds the time to coalescence. The linear approxima- time, which would require a smaller TFFT. tion fails for more portions of the parameter space for greater TFFT because the corresponding frequency bin is smaller. At smaller chirp masses, more of the parameter C. Computational cost and search design space is accessible to continuous-wave methods because of the small-enough spin-up during the observation time. There are two major contributors to the computational load of this search: (1) the grid we construct in k, corre- sponding essentially to a grid in chirp mass, and (2) the B. Cutoff time to observe grid we construct in the sky. The first point is relevant only for signals for which the linear approximation fails, In targeted continuous-wave searches, it is best to ob- but the second one is important for both signals that fol- serve for as long as possible so that we can take longer low both equation 3 and equation 18. We perform an and longer Fast Fourier Transforms, further isolating the estimation for a directed search and an all-sky search. signal and reducing noise to one smaller and smaller fre- quency bin. In transient continuous-wave searches, the signal does not last forever, and the spin-downs we con- 1. Directed search sider are typically orders of magnitude higher than those in continuous-wave searches, which limits the TFFT we For a directed search, for each combination of f0 and can take and therefore our sensitivity. M, we extract a frequency band whose width is de- For PBH signals, the spin-up increases with time as termined by the signal evolution during the observation seen in equation 1, which means that the corresponding time: fmin = f0; fmax = f(Tobs), and create a peakmap. TFFT we can take decreases, since we choose TFFT such Each point in the parameter space fmin, fmax,TFFT,Tobs that the power due to a signal with a particular spin-up f˙ determines a grid in k, which relates to the chirp mass. ˙ is confined to one frequency bin: fTFFT < 1/(2TFFT) → This grid in k is constructed such that the power due q ˙ to an inspiraling binary is confined to one x/k bin when TFFT < 1/ 2f. If we think about the sensitivity S of a moving from M to M+δM, where δM is a small change search in the following way [98]: in the chirp mass that relates to the spacing in k. See equations 21-24 in [80] for more details on this grid. h(f) 1/4 1/4 Using the optimal parameters in figure 8, we esti- S ∝ p Tobs TFFT , (25) Sn(f) mate the computational cost as a function of the fre- quency/chirp mass parameter space for a search in 50 there should exist optimal Tobs and TFFT based on the Hz bands. For each chirp mass in each frequency band, frequency evolution of the signal and the noise power we evaluate the duration of the signal and the maximum spectral density of the detector Sn(f) that maximizes spin-up. We then check to see if the frequency evolution S. More concretely, if we imagine a PBH system with is nonlinear, and exclude signals whose durations are less f0 = 20 Hz, the system will spin up into better and than 1 second or that have spin-ups greater than 1 Hz/s. better frequency bands (lower values of Sn), gain in am- The results are shown in figure 9, where each point cor- plitude (higher values of h(f)) over more and more time responds to a Generalized Frequency-Hough transform (greater Tobs) but with smaller TFFT. And eventually, being performed for a 50 Hz frequency band tuned to the signal will cross the bucket region in LIGO/Virgo that particular chirp mass. To determine the computa- and actually enter bands in which the detector sensitiv- tional time required, we ran the Generalized Frequency- ity becomes worse. Therefore, observing for long periods Hough on a peakmap that spanned 50 Hz and 5.5 hours. when TFFT is small may not give us a gain in sensitivity. The primary computational burden of the Generalized We investigated the interplay between these parameters Frequency-Hough are two for-loops, one over the number 11

(a) (b)

(c) (d)

FIG. 7. This figure shows the maximum time that we can observe for to detect a PBH inspiral as a function of the initial frequency and chirp mass of the system, assuming the linear approximation in equation 18 holds. These plots assume a maximum observation time of one year and TFFT = 16, 128, 1024, 8192 s, which represent typical transient continuous-wave and continuous-wave search choices. Above the green line on each plot represents the parameter space for which the observation time exceeds the time to coalescence, while white space indicates parameters for which the linear approximation never fails during the observation time. As TFFT increases, the linear approximation fails for more points in the parameter space (corresponding to less white space) because the frequency bin is smaller. of time steps and one over the number of points in the We note that the computational cost in figure V C 1 k grid. In this case, the total number of iterations was is idealistic because it assumes a fixed sky location; in around 2 million, and the Generalized Frequency-Hough practice, the position of a particular source of gravita- ran in about 140 seconds on one Quad-Core Intel Core tional waves is known with a degree of uncertainty, so it i7, so the time per iteration is around 50 µs . We then is possible that depending on TFFT, that more sky points determined the number of total iterations required as a will be necessary even for a directed search. In this case, function of the chirp mass and frequency, and multiplied the parameter space will have to be limited, but based on these numbers by the time per iteration. The results are the limits forecast in section VI, we do not expect to be shown in figure 9. We must also account for the fact able to place constraints on inspirals with very low chirp that the computation time corresponding to most points masses, which also turn out to be the most computation- in figure 9 is for a specific analysis duration that is less ally heavy part of a directed or all-sky search. than a year, Therefore in total, the computational time required for one Quad-Core Intel Core i7 is around 3400 The search design is then clear: we divide the 20-2000 days. When divided on ∼ 2000 cores, after peakmaps Hz band of our detectors in sub-bands that depend on have been created, a directed search can be performed in the chirp mass and frequency evolution of the expected only a few days. signals in that sub-band, and create time/frequency peakmaps with different TFFT and Tobs (these specific 12

FIG. 8. Source parameter space with optimal TFFT colored FIG. 9. We show the computational cost to perform the Gen- for particular observation times drawn as green contour lines. eralized Frequency-Hough in a directed search as a function We impose that the signal cannot spin-up by more than 1 of the source parameter space. We assume a known sky posi- Hz/s and cannot reach a frequency greater than 2048 Hz. tion, so the only limit on the observation time or TFFT comes The optimal choices for TFFT and Tobs do not behave linearly from the source’s intrinsic properties (its lifetime, its spin-up, at high frequencies, emphasizing the need for optimizing the etc.). The computational cost varies greatly across this space, choice of these two parameters. Moreover it is clear that for with more “transient” signals requiring a lot less time than lower frequencies and lower chirp masses, we should observe more “continuous” ones. White space in the bottom left-hand for longer with higher TFFT, which is consistent with the fact corner appears because for those parameter points, the linear that signals in that portion of the parameter space are more approximation to equation (3), equation (18), is valid. There similar to continuous waves than transient continuous waves. are not any points in the right-hand corner because systems To create this plot, we use the advanced LIGO/Virgo sensitiv- with these frequencies and chirp masses would either spin-up ity curves to determine Sn, and evaluate S for a range of Tobs too quickly (f˙ > 1 Hz/s) or merge too quickly (Tobs < 1 s). and TFFT at each point f0 and M in the parameter space, We observe a maximum as a “yellow” curve because we fix the and plot the combination of TFFT and Tobs that maximizes observation time to be at most one year, and at points below S. this curve, the Fast Fourier Transform time is increasing, thus resulting in a decrease in computational time. Based on our estimates, on 2000 Quad-Core Intel Core i7 cores in parallel, values are shown in figure 8). For each peakmap, we run a directed search using the Generalized Frequency-Hough on the Generalized Frequency-Hough, and then follow the one detector’s data would take only a few days. post-processing steps in section IV C. If we explore a portion of the parameter space in which the signal is linear, we can use the original Frequency- transient signals, the spin-up is high and TFFT << 1024 Hough, and also employ Band Sampled Data files [95], s. While a short TFFT does not imply a good sensitiv- which are more suited to situations in which the signal ity, it does limit the number of sky bins necessary to spans a narrow frequency band. Within this data analy- search over. Sky localization in the first stage of an all- sky search for PBHs is therefore poor compared to stan- sis framework, we can easily change TFFT to values that dard continuous-wave searches, but the coarseness of our exceed the TFFT chosen in the Short Fast Fourier Trans- form Databases.” sky-grid makes this search more tractable. A detailed explanation of the construction of a sky grid for an all-sky search is presented in [96]. Here we highlight the important parts relevant for our estimation 2. All-sky search of the computational cost. We first define the maximum frequency shift induced by the Doppler effect as: For the all-sky search, we must account for the Doppler shift due to the relative motion of the earth and source. v In continuous-wave searches, the Doppler shift requires B = orb f, (26) c that a shorter TFFT be taken relative to those presented in figure 8 to confine the frequency modulations to one where vorb is the earth’s velocity around the sun. B frequency bin. Furthemore TFFT is frequency-dependent is also known as the Doppler band, with the following because the Doppler shift is larger at higher frequencies number of frequency bins in it ND: [96]. To estimate the computational cost of an all-sky search, we require that TFFT < 1024 s, which implies a reasonable number of sky patches to search over [69]. B N = . (27) Because much of the parameter space is dominated by D δf 13

The number of sky points Nsky in the grid related to ND fers from that due to an asymmetrically rotating neutron by: star. We can then rewrite equations 31 and 32 in [80] as:

2 Nsky = 4πN , (28) 2/3 D h(ti) = Af(ti) = AFi, (29) where we have set the sky overresolution factor K = 1 sky where F = f(t )2/3: (see equation 43 in [96] for more details on this factor). i i For the chirp mass and frequency parameter space, we calculate ND based on TFFT in figure 8, ensuring 4 GM5/3 π 2/3 TFFT < 1024 s, and histogram the values of ND in fig- A = . (30) ure 10(a). This histogram shows that the sky grid in d c2 c most parts of the parameter space does not contain that many points, relative to standard continuous-wave all- Then the formula for the minimum detectable A is the sky searches. Indeed, we find that a total of O(107) sky same as for transient continuous-wave searches, which we points are necessary to be searched over to cover a chirp rewrite here for completeness: −7 −2 mass range [10 − 10 ]M over 20 − 2000 Hz. Based on the estimation in section V C 1 (which is essentially an estimate for a fixed sky location), it is computationally r !−1/2 4.02 N X F 2 infeasible to do a full, comprehensive all-sky search for A = i min 1/2 1/4 TFFT Sn(fi) PBH binaries, unless the parameter space is restricted to N θthr i higher chirp mass signals. 1/4 p (1 − p ) r √  To understand where this large number of sky points 0 0 −1 × 2 CRthr − 2erfc (2Γ) , (31) comes from, we show in figure 10(b) how the sky points p1 are distributed as a function of ND and M. The greatest contribution to the number of sky points comes from the where θthr is the threshold for peak selection selection lowest chirp masses considered at the lowest frequencies. in the whitened spectra, p0 is the probability of select- We therefore conclude that an all-sky search covering the ing a peak above the threshold θthr if the data contains −θ −2θ −3θ full parameter space is not feasible. only noise, p1 = e thr − 2e thr +e thr , CRthr is the threshold on the critical ratio we use to select candidates in the final Frequency-Hough map, and Γ is the chosen D. Theoretical sensitivity confidence level. The minimum detectable strain at a given confidence We determine an analytic expression for the theoretical level can be obtained from equation 31 using a suitable 2/3 sensitivity of our method to search for inspiraling PBHs. “frequency” (indeed h0,min = Amin · frequency ). We This section is in fact a generalization of the sensitivity use the initial frequency f0. estimate in [80]. There are a couple of differences in the interpretation We assume the signal is periodic but whose frequency of equation 31 when compared to the neutron star case: and amplitude vary in time. A semi-coherent analysis (1) the Fi are frequencies that are increasing with time, is based on the condition that in each data segment, of not decreasing, and (2) TFFT should now be fixed by the length TFFT, the signal frequency and amplitude are ap- maximum spin-up of the signal which will be at the end proximately constant. In particular, the frequency does time of the analysis (or the time at which equation 1 fails not shift more than one frequency bin. to model the inspiral). The same procedure in [80] can be followed, noting that The maximum distance reach dmax is now obtained by the amplitude evolution is given by equation 5, which dif- combining equations 30 and 31:

1/2  5/3 2/3 2 !  −1/4 s GM π  TFFT X F p0(1 − p0) θthr d = 0.995 √ i √ . (32) max c2 c T S (f ) Np2 −1
obs i n i 1 CRthr − 2erfc (2Γ)

The braking index n = 11/3 enters into equation 32 strain amplitude induced on the detector as a function through the frequency dependence in Fi. For different of frequency. For lower chirp masses, h0 is lower, but choices of observation time and chirp mass, we will have we can integrate for longer times because the signal is different maximum distance reaches. more “continuous” than those for higher chirp masses. Figure 11(a) shows how observation time affects the For higher chirp masses, the signals are transient, lasting 14

(a) (b)

FIG. 10. Left: a histogram of ND, the number of frequency bins in each Doppler band, is shown for a hypothetical all-sky search −7 −2 over the parameter space 20-2000 Hz for M = [10 , 10 ]M . Most values of ND are small because most of the parameter space results in more transient signals, which require shorter TFFT. The lowest chirp masses tend to produce the longest-lived signals, with the lowest spin-ups, which then allow for higher TFFT and therefore many more frequency bins in the Doppler band. Right: the number of sky points is plotted as a function of ND, with the chirp mass colored. The greatest contributors to the number of sky points in the grid come from the smallest chirp masses at the lowest frequencies in the search parameter space.

(a) (b)

FIG. 11. The left-hand plot shows the minimum detectable amplitude h0 at 90% confidence as a function of gravitational-wave −5 −4 −3 frequency in 50 Hz bands, with the log of the signal duration colored, for three chirp masses: M = [10 , 10 , 10 ]M . The right-hand plot shows the distance reach at 90% confidence as a function of gravitational wave frequency, with the corresponding TFFT colored. We fix the maximum duration of a signal to be equal to the fiducial observation time of one year, though the durations of signals at different frequencies can be less than one year. TFFT is chosen based on the spin-up of the signal at the end of observation time, hence it varies with frequency. In both plots, the curves from top to bottom correspond to decreasing chirp mass. for much shorter amounts of time, but are intrinsically of constraints we can place on the PBH mass fraction, stronger, though they induce smaller strains on the detec- which will be discussed in section VI. tor because they do not last as long. The scenario that is truly better must be weighted by the probability of Figure 11(b) shows the maximum distance reach for PBH mergers as a function of chirp mass and the kinds different chirp masses as a function of frequency. Addi- tionally, TFFT is colored, which shows how the spin-up of 15 the inspiraling system affects the sensitivity of the search. For longer signals, the distance reach is smaller, but the strain sensitivity is actually better, because we can use longer TFFT and observe for longer times. However, PBH systems with greater chirp mass can actually be seen far- ther away from us, even though they induce a smaller strain on the detector, because the theoretical distance reach is proportional to M5/3.

VI. LIMITS ON PBH ABUNDANCE

FIG. 12. Expected limits on the dark matter fraction made of We forecast limits on the fraction of dark matter that PBHs as a function of the chirp mass, for primordial binaries could be composed of PBHs. Based on figure 11(b) in Case 1 - agnostic mass function - (solid lines) and Case and equation 32, we calculate the expected constraint on 2 - thermal mass function - (dashed lines), and for binaries f such that at a particular distance and frequency, formed through tidal capture in Case 2 (dotted-dashed lines). PBH The different colors represent the limits from galactic binaries we would obtain one event for a specific merging rate (gal), from the galactic center (GC) and in the solar system scenario in a given observation time. We show such lim- vicinity (sol. sys.), for the expected sensitivities of advanced its in Figure 12, and find that LIGO/Virgo can already LIGO/Virgo and ET. The dotted elliptic region represents −5 constrain fPBH . 1 at chirp masses between 4×10 M constraints from the Optical Gravitational Lensing Experi- −3 and 10 M , within solar system vicinity (up to 2 kpc ment (OGLE) and the Subaru Hyper Suprime-Cam (HSC) distance), or from the galactic center. Farther away bi- [44] for comparison. naries in the galactic halo may also be probed with the method. We also find that Einstein Telescope will be −6 −2 able to set limits between 10 and 10 M , with op- VII. CONCLUSIONS −2 −4 −3 timal limits fPBH . 10 between 10 and 10 M . The most interesting limits are obtained for primordial In this paper we presented the first adaptation of binaries, whose merger rates are however controversial. continuous-wave methods to directly detect inspiraling For binaries formed by tidal capture, a relevant limit can planetary-mass binaries, and performed new calculations only obtained for galactic binaries with ET sensitivity. for the rates of these inspirals for different PBH mass Our constraints are complementary to those in [99], in functions. Our work shows that if such PBHs make up which the imprint in the stochastic gravitational-wave most of the dark matter, it is possible to probe a wide pa- background due to PBH mergers is calculated for PBH −8 rameter space of PBH chirp masses with continuous-wave masses of [10 , 1]M . −6 −3 techniques, between 10 and 10 M . In current and Continuous waves are therefore promising probes of future observation runs of LIGO/Virgo, we will be able sub-solar PBHs that will complement star, quasar and to place constraints, or even make a detection, of PBH supernovae microlensing searches. In particular, ET will inspirals within our galaxy, if they exist. We have also −6 −5 probe the interesting region between 10 and 10 M , forecast some expected constraints on the fraction that in which a series of microlensing events have been dis- PBHs compose of dark matter, assuming different mass covered in OGLE observations towards the galactic cen- functions, formation mechanisms and distances from us. −2 ter [44], suggesting fPBH ∼ 10 in this range. Out- We have shown that traditional continuous-wave meth- side of this range, other microlensing limits exist, but ods alone are not suited to probe an important fraction they rely on the assumption that PBHs are uniformly of the possible PBH inspiral parameter space. Tran- distributed in the galactic halo. These limits can also sient continuous-wave techniques, developed originally to be evaded if instead PBHs are clustered [22]. This case search for post-merger remnants of supernova or binary is the most relevant one for gravitational-wave observa- neutron star mergers, are in fact quite effective to search tions, and clustering plays a crucial role in the determi- for PBHs at galactic distances. The combination of both nation of PBH merging rates. Continuous waves could methods, however, is ideal: continuous-wave techniques therefore help to disentangle the different effects linked can see very near to us, at very low PBH chirp masses, to PBH clustering. While microlensing surveys towards while transient continuous-wave methods can see farther the Magellanic clouds or M31 set limits on the uniform out, for higher chirp masses. fraction of PBHs, continuous waves will probe PBHs in In the future we plan to run a real search on data from clusters, which make the two methods complementary to LIGO/Virgo’s third observation run using the method each other. and search design presented here, pointing towards the 16 galactic center. de Louvain (CISM/UCL) and the Consortium des We have fully characterized this method: we have the- Equipements´ de Calcul Intensif en F´ed´erationWallonie oretically estimated its sensitivity, determined an ideal Bruxelles (CECI)´ funded by the Fond de la Recherche way to run a search by weighing gains in observation Scientifique de Belgique (F.R.S.-FNRS) under conven- time against losses in sensitivity due to a rapidly spin- tion 2.5020.11 and by the Walloon Region. ning up signal, assessed the computational cost of both This research has made use of data, software and/or a directed and an all-sky search, and characterized the web tools obtained from the Gravitational Wave Open accessible parameter space in terms of our analysis pa- Science Center (https://www.gw-openscience.org/ ), a rameters. service of LIGO Laboratory, the LIGO Scientific Collab- It is worth noting that the adaption of continuous-wave oration and the Virgo Collaboration. LIGO Laboratory techniques is not just limited to the current detection and Advanced LIGO are funded by the United States era. Indeed, our work will have implications for PBH National Science Foundation (NSF) as well as the Sci- inspiral detection in ET that will probe smaller chirp ence and Technology Facilities Council (STFC) of the masses (lower frequencies) and lower abundances than United Kingdom, the Max-Planck-Society (MPS), and LIGO/Virgo currently can. Moreover, LISA will come the State of Niedersachsen/Germany for support of the online within 15 years, and since many sources detectable construction of Advanced LIGO and construction and by LISA are expected to be long-lived and have extremely operation of the GEO600 detector. Additional support small spin-ups, our methods can also be applied to find for Advanced LIGO was provided by the Australian Re- continuous waves from binary white dwarfs, inspiraling search Council. Virgo is funded, through the European supermassive black holes, etc. Characterizing the LISA Gravitational Observatory (EGO), by the French Centre sources to which our method can be sensitive is the sub- National de Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), the Italian ject of future work. Istituto Nazionale della Fisica Nucleare (INFN) and the Dutch Nikhef, with contributions by institutions from Belgium, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Japan, ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Monaco, Poland, Portugal, Spain. We also wish to acknowledge the support of the INFN- We would like to thank the continuous wave and dark CNAF computing center for its help with the storage and matter groups within the LIGO/Virgo collaboration, as transfer of the data used in this paper. well as Bernard Whiting and Cristiano Palomba, for very useful discussions. We thank the anonymous referees for their comments, We would also like to thank the Rome Virgo group for which have improved the paper. the tools necessary to perform these studies: the Short We would like to thank all of the essential workers who Fast Fourier Transform Databases and the Band Sample put their health at risk during the COVID-19 pandemic, Data structures, and for developing the methods used without whom we would not have been able to complete here. Additionally we would like to thank Luca Rei for this work. managing data transfer between Rome, CNAF and Lou- A.L.M. is a beneficiary of a FSR Incoming Post- vain. doctoral Fellowship. F.D.L. is supported by a FRIA Computational resources have been provided by the grant from the Fonds de la Recherche Scientifique FNRS, supercomputing facilities of the Universit´e catholique Belgium.

[1] J. Aasi, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Abernathy, [5] B. P. Abbott et al., “GW151226: Observation of Gravita- K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, P. Addesso, R. Ad- tional Waves from a 22-Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Co- hikari, et al., “Advanced ligo,” Classical and quantum alescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, no. 24, p. 241103, gravity, vol. 32, no. 7, p. 074001, 2015. 2016. [2] F. Acernese, M. Agathos, K. Agatsuma, D. Aisa, [6] B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170104: Observation of a 50- N. Allemandou, A. Allocca, J. Amarni, P. Astone, Solar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence at Redshift G. Balestri, G. Ballardin, et al., “Advanced virgo: a 0.2,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 118, no. 22, p. 221101, 2017. second-generation interferometric gravitational wave de- [Erratum: Phys.Rev.Lett. 121, 129901 (2018)]. tector,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 32, no. 2, [7] B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170814: A Three-Detector Ob- p. 024001, 2014. servation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Black [3] B. Abbott et al., “Observation of Gravitational Waves Hole Coalescence,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 119, no. 14, from a Binary Black Hole Merger,” Phys. Rev. Lett., p. 141101, 2017. vol. 116, no. 6, p. 061102, 2016. [8] B. P. Abbott et al., “GW170608: Observation of a 19- [4] B. Abbott et al., “Binary Black Hole Mergers in the first solar-mass Binary Black Hole Coalescence,” Astrophys. Advanced LIGO Observing Run,” Phys. Rev. X, vol. 6, J., vol. 851, no. 2, p. L35, 2017. no. 4, p. 041015, 2016. [Erratum: Phys.Rev.X 8, 039903 [9] B. P. Abbott et al., “GWTC-1: A Gravitational-Wave (2018)]. Transient Catalog of Compact Binary Mergers Observed 17

by LIGO and Virgo during the First and Second Observ- [28] B. Carr, S. Clesse, and J. Garc´ıa-Bellido, “Primordial ing Runs,” Phys. Rev., vol. X9, no. 3, p. 031040, 2019. black holes from the QCD epoch: Linking dark matter, [10] R. Abbott et al., “GW190412: Observation of a Binary- baryogenesis and anthropic selection,” Mon. Not. Roy. Black-Hole Coalescence with Asymmetric Masses,” Phys. Astron. Soc., vol. 501, no. 1, pp. 1426–1439, 2021. Rev. D, vol. 102, no. 4, p. 043015, 2020. [29] B. Carr, F. Kuhnel, and M. Sandstad, “Primordial Black [11] B. Abbott et al., “GW190425: Observation of a Compact Holes as Dark Matter,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 94, no. 8, Binary Coalescence with Total Mass ∼ 3.4M ,” Astro- p. 083504, 2016. phys. J. Lett., vol. 892, no. 1, p. L3, 2020. [30] B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, “New [12] R. Abbott et al., “GW190814: Gravitational Waves from cosmological constraints on primordial black holes,” the Coalescence of a 23 Solar Mass Black Hole with a 2.6 Phys. Rev. D, vol. 81, p. 104019, 2010. Solar Mass Compact Object,” Astrophys. J., vol. 896, [31] B. Carr, K. Kohri, Y. Sendouda, and J. Yokoyama, no. 2, p. L44, 2020. “Constraints on Primordial Black Holes,” 2 2020. [13] R. Abbott et al., “GW190521: A Binary Black Hole arXiv:2002.12778. Merger with a Total Mass of 150 M ,” Phys. Rev. Lett., [32] B. Carr and F. Kuhnel, “Primordial Black Holes as Dark vol. 125, no. 10, p. 101102, 2020. Matter: Recent Developments,” Ann. Rev. Nucl. Part. [14] R. Abbott et al., “Properties and Astrophysical Im- Sci., pp. 170:14.1–14.40, 6 2020. plications of the 150 M Binary Black Hole Merger [33] A. M. Green and B. J. Kavanagh, “Primordial Black GW190521,” Astrophys. J., vol. 900, no. 1, p. L13, 2020. Holes as a dark matter candidate,” J. Phys. G, vol. 48, [15] S. Bird, I. Cholis, J. B. Mu˜noz, Y. Ali-Ha¨ımoud, no. 4, p. 4, 2021. M. Kamionkowski, E. D. Kovetz, A. Raccanelli, [34] C. Kouvaris, P. Tinyakov, and M. H. Tytgat, “Nonpri- and A. G. Riess, “Did LIGO detect dark matter?,” mordial solar mass black holes,” Physical Review Letters, Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 116, no. 20, p. 201301, 2016. vol. 121, no. 22, p. 221102, 2018. [16] S. Clesse and J. Garc´ıa-Bellido,“The clustering of mas- [35] B. Dasgupta, R. Laha, and A. Ray, “Low Mass Black sive Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter: mea- Holes from Dark Core Collapse,” Phys. Rev. Lett., suring their mass distribution with Advanced LIGO,” vol. 126, no. 14, p. 141105, 2021. Phys. Dark Universe, vol. 15, pp. 142–147, 2017. [36] C. T. Byrnes, M. Hindmarsh, S. Young, and M. R. S. [17] M. Sasaki, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, Hawkins, “Primordial black holes with an accurate QCD “Primordial Black Hole Scenario for the Gravitational- equation of state,” JCAP, vol. 1808, no. 08, p. 041, 2018. Wave Event GW150914,” Phys. Rev. Lett., [37] S. Clesse and J. GarcAa-Bellido,˜ “Massive Primordial vol. 117, no. 6, p. 061101, 2016. [erratum: Black Holes from Hybrid Inflation as Dark Matter and Phys. Rev. Lett.121,no.5,059901(2018)]. the seeds of Galaxies,” Phys. Rev., vol. D92, no. 2, [18] Y. Ali-Haimoud, E. D. Kovetz, and M. Kamionkowski, p. 023524, 2015. “Merger rate of primordial black-hole binaries,” Phys. [38] J. M. Ezquiaga, J. Garcia-Bellido, and E. Ruiz Morales, Rev. D, vol. 96, no. 12, p. 123523, 2017. “Primordial Black Hole production in Critical Higgs In- [19] A. Hall, A. D. Gow, and C. T. Byrnes, “Bayesian anal- flation,” Phys. Lett. B, vol. 776, pp. 345–349, 2018. ysis of LIGO-Virgo mergers: Primordial vs. astrophys- [39] J. C. Niemeyer and K. Jedamzik, “Near-Critical Grav- ical black hole populations,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 102, itational Collapse and the Initial Mass Function of Pri- p. 123524, 2020. mordial Black Holes,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 80, pp. 5481– [20] V. De Luca, V. Desjacques, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, 5484, 1998. “The clustering evolution of primordial black holes,” [40] K. Jedamzik, “Primordial black hole formation during JCAP, vol. 11, p. 028, 2020. the QCD epoch,” Phys. Rev., vol. D55, pp. R5871–5875, [21] S. Clesse and J. Garc´ıa-Bellido,“Seven hints for primor- 1997. dial black hole dark matter,” Physics of the Dark Uni- [41] Z. Arzoumanian et al., “The NANOGrav 12.5 yr Data verse, vol. 22, pp. 137–146, 2018. Set: Search for an Isotropic Stochastic Gravitational- [22] B. Carr, S. Clesse, J. Garc´ıa-Bellido, and F. K¨uhnel, wave Background,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 905, no. 2, “Cosmic conundra explained by thermal history and p. L34, 2020. primordial black holes,” Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 31, [42] V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ae, “Did NANOGrav see a p. 100755, 2021. signal from primordial black hole formation?,” Phys. Rev. [23] K. Jedamzik, “Primordial Black Hole Dark Matter and Lett., vol. 126, no. 5, p. 051303, 2021. the LIGO/Virgo observations,” JCAP, vol. 09, p. 022, [43] G. Dom`enech and S. Pi, “NANOGrav Hints on Planet- 2020. Mass Primordial Black Holes,” 10 2020. [24] K. Jedamzik, “Consistency of Primordial Black Hole [44] H. Niikura, M. Takada, S. Yokoyama, T. Sumi, and Dark Matter with LIGO/Virgo Merger Rates,” Phys. S. Masaki, “Constraints on Earth-mass primordial black Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 5, p. 051302, 2021. holes from OGLE 5-year microlensing events,” Phys. [25] C. Boehm, A. Kobakhidze, C. A. J. O’hare, Z. S. C. Rev., vol. D99, no. 8, p. 083503, 2019. Picker, and M. Sakellariadou, “Eliminating the LIGO [45] M. R. S. Hawkins, “The signature of primordial black bounds on primordial black hole dark matter,” JCAP, holes in the dark matter halos of galaxies,” Astron. As- vol. 03, p. 078, 2021. trophys., vol. 633, p. A107, 2020. [26] V. De Luca, G. Franciolini, and A. Riotto, “NANOGrav [46] S. Bhatiani, X. Dai, and E. Guerras, “Confirmation of Data Hints at Primordial Black Holes as Dark Matter,” planet-mass objects in extragalactic systems,” The As- Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 126, no. 4, p. 041303, 2021. trophysical Journal, vol. 885, no. 1, p. 77, 2019. [27] J. GarcAa-Bellido,˜ B. Carr, and S. Clesse, “A com- [47] M. Hawkins, “SDSS J1004+4112: the case for a galaxy mon origin for baryons and dark matter,” 4 2019. cluster dominated by primordial black holes,” Astron. arXiv:1904.11482. Astrophys., vol. 643, p. A10, 2020. 18

[48] P. Mr´oz, A. Udalski, J. Skowron, R. Poleski, T. Dent, S. Fairhurst, et al., “The pycbc search for grav- S. Koz lowski, M. K. Szyma´nski, I. Soszy´nski, itational waves from compact binary coalescence,” Clas- L.Wyrzykowski, P. Pietrukowicz, K. Ulaczyk, et al., “No sical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 33, no. 21, p. 215004, large population of unbound or wide-orbit jupiter-mass 2016. planets,” Nature, vol. 548, no. 7666, pp. 183–186, 2017. [66] M. Maggiore, Gravitational Waves: Volume 1: Theory [49] J. Scholtz and J. Unwin, “What if Planet 9 is a Pri- and Experiments, vol. 1. Oxford University Press, 2008. mordial Black Hole?,” Phys. Rev. Lett., vol. 125, no. 5, [67] K. Riles, “Recent searches for continuous gravitational p. 051103, 2020. waves,” Modern Physics Letters A, vol. 32, no. 39, [50] A. Siraj and A. Loeb, “Searching for Black Holes in p. 1730035, 2017. the Outer Solar System with LSST,” Astrophys. J. Lett., [68] M. Sieniawska et al., “Continuous waves from neutron vol. 898, no. 1, p. L4, 2020. stars: current status and prospects,” Universe, vol. 5, [51] J. Garc´ıa-Bellidoand S. Clesse, “Constraints from mi- no. 11, p. 217, 2019. crolensing experiments on clustered primordial black [69] B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, S. Abraham, F. Acer- holes,” Phys. Dark Univ., vol. 19, pp. 144–148, 2018. nese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, R. Adhikari, V. Adya, C. Af- [52] J. Calcino, J. Garcia-Bellido, and T. M. Davis, “Updat- feldt, et al., “Searches for gravitational waves from known ing the MACHO fraction of the Milky Way dark halowith pulsars at two harmonics in 2015–2017 ligo data,” The improved mass models,” Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., Astrophysical Journal, vol. 879, no. 1, p. 10, 2019. vol. 479, no. 3, pp. 2889–2905, 2018. [70] O. J. Piccinni, P. Astone, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, [53] K. M. Belotsky, V. I. Dokuchaev, Y. N. Eroshenko, E. A. G. Intini, I. La Rosa, P. Leaci, S. Mastrogiovanni, Esipova, M. Y. Khlopov, L. A. Khromykh, A. A. Kirillov, A. Miller, and C. Palomba, “Directed search for continu- V. V. Nikulin, S. G. Rubin, and I. V. Svadkovsky, “Clus- ous gravitational-wave signals from the galactic center in ters of primordial black holes,” Eur. Phys. J. C, vol. 79, the advanced ligo second observing run,” Physical Review no. 3, p. 246, 2019. D, vol. 101, no. 8, p. 082004, 2020. [54] M. Trashorras, J. Garc´ıa-Bellido,and S. Nesseris, “The [71] J. Aasi, B. Abbott, R. Abbott, T. Abbott, M. Aber- clustering dynamics of primordial black boles in N-body nathy, F. Acernese, K. Ackley, C. Adams, T. Adams, simulations,” Universe, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 18, 2021. P. Addesso, et al., “Searches for continuous gravitational [55] M. Punturo et al., “The third generation of gravita- waves from nine young supernova remnants,” The Astro- tional wave observatories and their science reach,” Class. physical Journal, vol. 813, no. 1, p. 39, 2015. Quant. Grav., vol. 27, p. 084007, 2010. [72] B. P. Abbott et al., “Search for gravitational waves from [56] S. Hild, M. Abernathy, F. Acernese, P. Amaro-Seoane, a long-lived remnant of the binary neutron star merger N. Andersson, K. Arun, F. Barone, B. Barr, M. Bar- GW170817,” The Astrophysical Journal, vol. 875, p. 160, suglia, M. Beker, et al., “Sensitivity studies for third- Apr 2019. generation gravitational wave observatories,” Classical [73] D. Keitel, G. Woan, M. Pitkin, C. Schumacher, B. Pearl- and Quantum Gravity, vol. 28, no. 9, p. 094013, 2011. stone, K. Riles, A. G. Lyne, J. Palfreyman, B. Stappers, [57] M. Maggiore et al., “Science Case for the Einstein Tele- and P. Weltevrede, “First search for long-duration tran- scope,” JCAP, vol. 03, p. 050, 2020. sient gravitational waves after glitches in the Vela and [58] E. L. Osborne and D. I. Jones, “Gravitational waves from Crab pulsars,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, no. 6, p. 064058, magnetically-induced thermal neutron star mountains,” 2019. Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., vol. 494, no. 2, pp. 2839– [74] M. Isi, L. Sun, R. Brito, and A. Melatos, “Directed 2850, 2020. searches for gravitational waves from ultralight bosons,” [59] G. Ushomirsky, C. Cutler, and L. Bildsten, “Deforma- Physical Review D, vol. 99, no. 8, p. 084042, 2019. tions of accreting neutron star crusts and gravitational [75] C. Palomba, S. D’Antonio, P. Astone, S. Frasca, G. In- wave emission,” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronom- tini, I. La Rosa, P. Leaci, S. Mastrogiovanni, A. L. Miller, ical Society, vol. 319, no. 3, pp. 902–932, 2000. F. Muciaccia, et al., “Direct constraints on the ultra- [60] Johnson-McDaniel et al., “Maximum elastic deforma- light boson mass from searches of continuous gravita- tions of relativistic stars,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 88, tional waves,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 123, no. 17, p. 044004, Aug 2013. p. 171101, 2019. [61] B. Abbott et al., “All-sky search for continuous gravita- [76] S. D’Antonio, C. Palomba, P. Astone, S. Frasca, G. In- tional waves from isolated neutron stars using Advanced tini, I. La Rosa, P. Leaci, S. Mastrogiovanni, A. Miller, LIGO O2 data,” Physical Review D, vol. 100, no. 2, F. Muciaccia, et al., “Semicoherent analysis method to p. 024004, 2019. search for continuous gravitational waves emitted by ul- [62] A. L. Watts, B. Krishnan, L. Bildsten, and B. F. Schutz, tralight boson clouds around spinning black holes,” Phys- “Detecting gravitational wave emission from the known ical Review D, vol. 98, no. 10, p. 103017, 2018. accreting neutron stars,” Monthly Notices of the Royal [77] H.-K. Guo, K. Riles, F.-W. Yang, and Y. Zhao, “Search- Astronomical Society, vol. 389, no. 2, pp. 839–868, 2008. ing for dark photon dark matter in ligo o1 data,” Com- [63] P. D. Lasky et al., “The braking index of millisecond munications Physics, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–7, 2019. magnetars,” The Astrophysical Journal Letters, vol. 843, [78] A. Pierce, Z. Zhang, Y. Zhao, et al., “Dark photon dark no. 1, p. L1, 2017. matter produced by axion oscillations,” Physical Review [64] N. Sarin, P. D. others Lasky, L. Sammut, and G. Ashton, D, vol. 99, no. 7, p. 075002, 2019. “X-ray guided gravitational-wave search for binary neu- [79] A. L. Miller et al., “Probing new light gauge bosons tron star merger remnants,” Physical Review D, vol. 98, with gravitational-wave interferometers using an adapted no. 4, p. 043011, 2018. semicoherent method,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 103, no. 10, [65] S. A. Usman, A. H. Nitz, I. W. Harry, C. M. Biwer, p. 103002, 2021. D. A. Brown, M. Cabero, C. D. Capano, T. Dal Canton, [80] A. Miller, P. Astone, et al., “Method to search for long 19

duration gravitational wave transients from isolated neu- GW190814: Two candidate mergers of primordial black tron stars using the Generalized Frequency-Hough trans- holes from the QCD epoch,” 7 2020. arXiv:2007.06481. form,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 98, p. 102004, Nov 2018. [91] V. Vaskonen and H. Veerm¨ae, “Lower bound on the [81] M. Oliver, D. Keitel, and A. M. Sintes, “Adaptive tran- primordial black hole merger rate,” Physical Review D, sient hough method for long-duration gravitational wave vol. 101, no. 4, p. 043015, 2020. transients,” Physical Review D, vol. 99, no. 10, p. 104067, [92] U. Haud and J. Einasto, “Galactic models with massive 2019. corona I. Method,” Astron. Astrophys., vol. 223, pp. 89– [82] A. Mytidis, M. Coughlin, and B. Whiting, “Constrain- 94, 1989. ing the r-mode saturation amplitude from a hypothetical [93] A. Kashlinsky, “LIGO gravitational wave detection, pri- detection of r-mode gravitational waves from a newborn mordial black holes and the near-IR cosmic infrared back- neutron star: Sensitivity study,” The Astrophysical Jour- ground anisotropies,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 823, no. 2, nal, vol. 810, no. 1, p. 27, 2015. p. L25, 2016. [83] A. Mytidis et al., “Sensitivity study using machine learn- [94] P. Astone, S. Frasca, and C. Palomba, “The short fft ing algorithms on simulated r-mode gravitational wave database and the peak map for the hierarchical search signals from newborn neutron stars,” Physical Review D, of periodic sources,” Classical and Quantum Gravity, vol. 99, no. 2, p. 024024, 2019. vol. 22, no. 18, p. S1197, 2005. [84] B. J. Owen, L. Lindblom, C. Cutler, B. F. Schutz, A. Vec- [95] O. Piccinni, P. Astone, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, G. In- chio, and N. Andersson, “Gravitational waves from hot tini, P. Leaci, S. Mastrogiovanni, A. Miller, C. Palomba, young rapidly rotating neutron stars,” Physical Review and A. Singhal, “A new data analysis framework for the D, vol. 58, no. 8, p. 084020, 1998. search of continuous gravitational wave signals,” Classi- [85] T. Nakamura, M. Sasaki, T. Tanaka, and K. S. Thorne, cal and Quantum Gravity, vol. 36, no. 1, p. 015008, 2018. “Gravitational waves from coalescing black hole MACHO [96] P. Astone, A. Colla, S. D’Antonio, S. Frasca, and binaries,” Astrophys. J. Lett., vol. 487, pp. L139–L142, C. Palomba, “Method for all-sky searches of continuous 1997. gravitational wave signals using the Frequency-Hough [86] M. Raidal, C. Spethmann, V. Vaskonen, and H. Veerm¨ae, transform,” Physical Review D, vol. 90, no. 4, p. 042002, “Formation and evolution of primordial black hole bina- 2014. ries in the early universe,” Journal of Cosmology and [97] A. L. Miller, P. Astone, et al., “How effective is machine Astroparticle Physics, vol. 2019, no. 02, p. 018, 2019. learning to detect long transient gravitational waves from [87] A. D. Gow, C. T. Byrnes, A. Hall, and J. A. Peacock, neutron stars in a real search?,” Physical Review D, “Primordial black hole merger rates: distributions for vol. 100, no. 6, p. 062005, 2019. multiple LIGO observables,” JCAP, vol. 2001, no. 01, [98] S. Caride, R. Inta, B. J. Owen, and B. Rajbhandari, p. 031, 2020. “How to search for gravitational waves from r-modes of [88] L. Liu, Z.-K. Guo, and R.-G. Cai, “Effects of the sur- known pulsars,” Phys. Rev. D, vol. 100, p. 064013, Sep rounding primordial black holes on the merger rate of pri- 2019. mordial black hole binaries,” Physical Review D, vol. 99, [99] S. Wang, T. Terada, and K. Kohri, “Prospective con- no. 6, p. 063523, 2019. straints on the primordial black hole abundance from [89] B. Kocsis, T. Suyama, T. Tanaka, and S. Yokoyama, the stochastic gravitational-wave backgrounds produced “Hidden universality in the merger rate distribution by coalescing events and curvature perturbations,” Phys. in the primordial black hole scenario,” Astrophys. J., Rev. D, vol. 99, no. 10, p. 103531, 2019. [Erratum: vol. 854, no. 1, p. 41, 2018. Phys.Rev.D 101, 069901 (2020)]. [90] S. Clesse and J. Garcia-Bellido, “GW190425 and