DOCSLIB.ORG

The Complete Undergraduate Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Complete Undergraduate Handbook 2017-2018 The Undergraduate Handbook [FULL LENGTH VERSION] The School of Physics and Astronomy http://www.physics.manchester.ac.uk/study/under graduate/undergraduatehandbook/ [email protected] University of Manchester Contents A. Academic Staff List – School of Physics and Astronomy ................................................................................................................................................. 1 B. Who’s Who? School Teaching and Learning Academic Team ......................................................................................................................................... 1 C. School Teaching and Learning Support Team ................................................................................................................................................................ 2 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 The School Buildings...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Master's and Bachelor's Degrees.................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Degree Programmes Available ....................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Academic Year .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 2 1.5 Communication with students ....................................................................................................................................................................... 3 1.6 Student Services Centre................................................................................................................................................................................. 3 1.7 Health and Safety Induction........................................................................................................................................................................... 3 2a. Competencies required for undergraduates completing a degree programme in the School of Physics and Astronomy .................................................. 4 2b. Aims and Objectives for Teaching and Learning .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Outcomes for all undergraduate programmes in physics ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.2 Aims and Learning Outcomes distinctive to particular degree programmes ...................................................................................................... 7 2.3 Aims and Learning Outcomes of Lectures, Tutorials, Laboratory Work and Workshops ..................................................................................... 8 2.4 Learning outcomes for Laboratory ................................................................................................................................................................10 2.5 General Papers ............................................................................................................................................................................................12 2.6 Physics with Study in Europe students: Report on Year Abroad .......................................................................................................................13 3. Student Support Welfare and Guidance ......................................................................................................................................................................14 3.1 Personal Tutors ...........................................................................................................................................................................................14 3.2 Disability Advisory and Support Service .........................................................................................................................................................14 3.3 University Support Services..........................................................................................................................................................................14 3.4 Tutors and Tutorials ....................................................................................................................................................................................14 3.5 Contact with other Academic Staff (refer to Staff Lists in sections A. and B.) ...................................................................................................15 3.6 References...................................................................................................................................................................................................15 3.7 Peer Assisted Study Sessions (PASS) ..............................................................................................................................................................15 3.8 Careers Service ............................................................................................................................................................................................15 3.9 Student Work and Attendance ......................................................................................................................................................................15 3.10 Student Ill-Health and Assessment ..............................................................................................................................................................16 4. Course Review ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................18 4.1 The School Board .........................................................................................................................................................................................18 4.2 Physics Students Representatives Committee ................................................................................................................................................18 4.3 The Teaching and Learning Committee ..........................................................................................................................................................18 4.4 The Laboratory Committee ...........................................................................................................................................................................18 4.5 Teaching Quality and Lecture Allocation Group ..............................................................................................................................................18 4.6 Year Tutors ..................................................................................................................................................................................................19 4.7 Year Laboratory Tutors .................................................................................................................................................................................19 4.8 National Student Survey (NSS) ......................................................................................................................................................................19 4.9 External Examiners’ Reports .........................................................................................................................................................................19 5. Learning Resources ....................................................................................................................................................................................................20 5.1 The University of Manchester Library ............................................................................................................................................................20 5.2 Physics Help Service .....................................................................................................................................................................................20 5.3 Blackboard (https://online.manchester.ac.uk) ...............................................................................................................................................20 5.4 Computing Facilities in the School .................................................................................................................................................................21 6. Structure of Degree Programmes by Year and Semester...............................................................................................................................................22 First Year – Semester 1 ..............................................................................................................................................................................................23
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Philippa Hartley Title Abstract
    Philippa Hartley Title Cosmic telescopes: witnessing the emission mechanism of radio quiet quasars Abstract The quasar model has reached relative maturity: we know that light is emitted at great power across the electromagnetic spectrum from the active nuclei of distant galaxies, where violent accretion processes release huge amounts of energy from gravitational stores. We observe that, in some quasars, matter falling onto the central black hole is funnneled into dramatic jets, emitting radio light across galactic distances. Over cosmic history the quasar population peaked in unison with star formation activity, leading us to suspect the role of quasars in the quenching of star-formation. Missing from the picture, however, is a full understanding of how such feedback processes manifest in the vast majority of quasars: those objects with very little radio emission. In these 'radio-quiet' quasars, jets appear to be absent, and it is possible that the faint radio signal that we do detect is the result either of smaller-scale AGN activity, of continued star formation, or of both. Only by undestanding the source of this very faint emission can we fully understand the quasar stage of galaxy evolution. This talk presents findings using strong gravitational lenses as 'cosmic telescopes' that magnify distant source structure, allowing us to resolve these intriguing objects to the sub-parsec scale. Philippa Hartley SKA Organisation, Jodrell Bank Observatory, Cheshire, SK11 9FT, UK +44 (0)161 306 9600 · [email protected] RESEARCH INTERESTS
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the Radionet3 Networking Activity
    REPORT ON THE RADIONET3 NETWORKING ACTIVITY TITLE: LOFAR SCIENCE WEEK 2014 A JOINT MEETING COMBINING THE “2014 LOFAR COMMUNITY SCIENCE WORKSHOP” AND A SEPARATE, RELATED SYMPOSIUM ON “FIRST SCIENCE WITH LOFAR’S FIRST ALL-SKY SURVEY” DATE: 7 APRIL – 11 APRIL 2014 TIME: ALL DAY LOCATION: AMSTERDAM, THE NETHERLANDS MEETING WEBPAGE http://www.astron.nl/lofarscience2014/ HOST INSTITUTE: ASTRON (NETHERLANDS INSTITUTE FOR RADIO ASTRONOMY) PARTICIPANTS NO: 105 (COMMUNITY WORKSHOP) / 62 (SURVEY WORKSHOP) MAIN LEADER: ASTRON Project supported by the European Commission Contract no.: 283393 REPORT: 1. Agenda of the meeting The final programmes for both of the workshops are reproduced in their entirety in Appendix A. The programs and presentations are also available from the conference website. 2. Scientific Summary The LOFAR Science Week for 2014 was held April 7-11, 2014 in Amsterdam, NL and brought together roughly 120 members of the LOFAR science community. The week began on Monday afternoon with a LOFAR Users Meeting, open to the whole LOFAR community, organized by ASTRON and intended to provide a forum for users to both learn about the status of the array as well as provide feedback. Members of ASTRON gave updates on the current operational status, ongoing developments, and plans for the coming year. Representative users from the community were also invited to share their personal experiences from using the system. Robert Pizzo and the Science Support team were on hand to answer questions and gathered a lot of good feedback that they will use to improve the user experience for LOFAR. The User’s Meeting was followed on Tuesday by a two day LOFAR Community Science Workshop where nearly 120 members of the LOFAR collaboration came together to present their latest science results and share ideas and experiences about doing science with LOFAR.
    [Show full text]
  • Planck 2011 Conference the Millimeter And
    PLANCK 2011 CONFERENCE THE MILLIMETER AND SUBMILLIMETER SKY IN THE PLANCK MISSION ERA 10-14 January 2011 Paris, Cité des Sciences Monday, January 10th 2011 13:00 Registration 14:00 Claudie Haigneré (Présidente of Universcience) Welcome Planck mission status, Performances, Cross-calibration Jan Tauber (ESA) - Jean-Loup Puget (IAS Orsay) - Reno Mandolesi (INAF/IASF Bologna) Introduction Session chair: François Pajot 14:20 François Bouchet (Institut d'Astrophysique de Paris) 30+5' HFI data and performance (invited on Planck early paper) 14:55 Marco Bersanelli (University of Milano) 30+5' LFI data and performance (invited on Planck early paper) 15:30 Ranga Chary (IPAC Caltech) 30+5' Planck Early Release Compact Source Catalogue (invited on Planck early paper) 16:05 Coffee break 16:30 Goran Pilbratt (European Space Agency) 20+5' The Herschel observatory (invited) Radio sources 16:55 Bruce Partridge (Haverford College) 25+5' Overview (invited) 17:25 Luigi Tofolatti (Universidad de Oviedo) 20+5' Planck radio sources statistics (invited on Planck early paper) 17:50 Francisco Argueso (Universidad de Oviedo) 15+5' A Bayesian technique to detect point sources in CMB maps 18:10 Anna Scaife (Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies) 15+5' The 10C survey of Radio Sources - First Results 18:30 End of day 1 19:00 Welcome reception at the Conference Center Tuesday, January 11th 2011 Radio sources (continued) Session chair: Bruce Partridge 9:00 Anne Lahteenmaki (Aalto University Metsahovi Radio Observatory) 20+5' Planck observations of extragalactic radio
    [Show full text]
  • Probing Galaxy Halos Using Background Polarized Radio Sources
    Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Master’s thesis in Physics and Astronomy ANTON NILSSON Department of Earth and Space Sciences CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson Department of Earth and Space Sciences Radio Astronomy and Astrophysics group Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson © Anton Nilsson, 2016. Supervisor: Cathy Horellou, Department of Earth and Space Sciences Examiner: Cathy Horellou, Department of Earth and Space Sciences Department of Earth and Space Sciences Radio Astronomy and Astrophysics group Chalmers University of Technology SE-412 96 Gothenburg Telephone +46 31 772 1000 Cover: Polarized emission of the radio source J133920+464115 at Faraday depth +20.75 rad m−2 in grayscale. The contours show the total intensity. Typeset in LATEX Printed by Chalmers Reproservice Gothenburg, Sweden 2016 iv Probing galaxy halos using background polarized radio sources Anton Nilsson Department of Earth and Space Sciences Chalmers University of Technology Abstract Linearly polarized radio emission from synchrotron sources undergoes Faraday ro- tation when passing through a magneto-ionized medium. This might be used to search for evidence of ionized halos around galaxies, using polarized radio sources as a probe. In this thesis I analyze the polarization properties of background radio sources from the Taylor et al. (2009) catalog based on observations with the Very Large Array, and correlate these to the angular separation between the radio sources and foreground galaxies. I find a decrease in the amount of polarized radio sources near the galaxies, interpreting this as radio sources being depolarized by galaxy halos.
    [Show full text]
  • OTFM for Fast Mapping & Rapid Data Products
    OTFM for fast mapping & rapid data products Steven T. Myers (NRAO) for the VLASS team 1 B&E Caltech July 2016 The VLA Sky Survey (VLASS) On-the-fly Mosaicking (OTFM) for efficient fast mapping of the sky and pipelines for rapid genera=on of Data Products … wherein we elucidate the sundry benefits of using the recently upgraded Karl G. Jansky Very Large Array to survey large areas of the sky to discover new transient phenomena and illuminate heretofore hidden explosions throughout the Universe, and to explore cosmic magnetism h0ps://science.nrao.edu/science/surveys/vlass 2 B&E Caltech July 2016 Why a new VLA Sky Survey? A New VLA deserves a New Sky Survey https://science.nrao.edu/science/surveys/vlass • Expanded (bandwidth, time resolution) capabilities of Jansky VLA • 20 years since previous pioneering VLA sky surveys – NVSS 45” 1.4GHz (84MHz) 450µJy/bm (2932hrs) 30Kdeg2 2Msrcs – FIRST 5” 1.4GHz (84MHz) 150µJy/bm (3200hrs) 10.6Kdeg2 95Ksrcs • Preparing the way for a new generation of surveys – ASKAP and MeerKAT – SKA phase 1 – new O/IR surveys (i/zPTF, PanSTARRS,DES,LSST), X-ray (eROSITA) • Science Proposal and survey definition by community Survey Science Group (SSG) following AAS 223 workshop in Jan 2014 – community review and approval in March 2015 3 B&E Caltech July 2016 VLASS Survey Science Group A Survey For the Whole Community Proposal Authors: Table 8: VLASS Proposal Contributors, Including VLASS White Paper Authors F. Abdalla, Jose Afonso, A. Amara, David Bacon, Julie Banfield, Tim Bastian, Richard Battye, Stefi A. Baum, Tony Beasley, Rainer Beck, Robert Becker, Michael Bell, Edo Berger, Rob Beswick, Sanjay Bhat- nagar, Mark Birkinshaw, V.
    [Show full text]
  • Prospects for Weak Lensing Studies with New Radio Telescopes
    PROSPECTS FOR WEAK LENSING STUDIES WITH NEW RADIO TELESCOPES MICHAEL L. BROWN Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, School of Physics & Astronomy, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester M13 9PL I consider the prospects for performing weak lensing studies with the new generation of radio telescopes that are coming online now and in the future. I include a description of a proposed technique to use polarization observations in radio weak lensing analyses which could prove extremely useful for removing a contaminating signal from intrinsic alignments. Ultimately, the Square Kilometre Array promises to be an exceptional instrument for performing weak lensing studies due to the high resolution, large area surveys which it will perform. In the nearer term, the e-MERLIN instrument in the UK offers the high sensitivity and sub-arcsec resolution required to prove weak lensing techniques in the radio band. I describe the Su- perCLASS survey – a recently accepted e-MERLIN legacy programme which will perform a pioneering radio weak lensing analysis of a supercluster of galaxies. 1 Weak lensing in the radio band Weak gravitational lensing is the coherent distortion in the images of faint background galaxies due to gravitational light deflection caused by intervening (dark) matter distributions. On the very largest scales, the effect traces the large scale structure of the Universe and is known as cosmic shear. The vast majority of weak lensing surveys to date have been conducted in the optical bands since large numbers of background galaxies are required in order to measure the small (∼ a few %) distortions. However, a new generation of powerful radio facilities is now imminent which makes weak lensing in the radio band a viable alternative.
    [Show full text]
  • Square Kilometre Array: Processing Voluminous Meerkat Data on IRIS
    SQUARE KILOMETRE ARRAY :PROCESSING VOLUMINOUS MEERKAT DATA ON IRIS Priyaa Thavasimani Anna Scaife Faculty of Science and Engineering Faculty of Science and Engineering The University of Manchester The University of Manchester Manchester, UK Manchester, UK [email protected] [email protected] June 1, 2021 ABSTRACT Processing astronomical data often comes with huge challenges with regards to data management as well as data processing. MeerKAT telescope is one of the precursor telescopes of the World’s largest observatory Square Kilometre Array. So far, MeerKAT data was processed using the South African computing facility i.e. IDIA, and exploited to make ground-breaking discoveries. However, to process MeerKAT data on UK’s IRIS computing facility requires new implementation of the MeerKAT pipeline. This paper focuses on how to transfer MeerKAT data from the South African site to UK’s IRIS systems for processing. We discuss about our RapifXfer Data transfer framework for transferring the MeerKAT data from South Africa to the UK, and the MeerKAT job processing framework pertaining to the UK’s IRIS resources. Keywords Big Data · MeerKAT · Square Kilometre Array · Telescope · Data Analysis · Imaging Introduction The Square Kilometre Array (SKA) will be the world’s largest telescope, but once built it comes with its huge data challenges. The SKA instrument sites are in Australia and South Africa. This paper focuses on the South African SKA precursor MeerKAT, in particular on its data processing, calibration, and imaging using the UK IRIS resources. MeerKAT data are initially hosted by IDIA (Inter-University Institute for Data-Intensive Astronomy; [1]), which itself provides data storage and a data-intensive research cloud facility to service the MeerKAT science community in South Africa.
    [Show full text]
  • Data Science for Physics and Astronomy Lightning Talks Data Science for Physics & Astronomy Classification of Transients Catarina Alves
    Data science for Physics and Astronomy Lightning talks Data science for Physics & Astronomy Classification of transients Catarina Alves PhD @ Supervisors: ● Prof Hiranya Peiris ● Dr Jason McEwen [email protected] Supervised Learning Classification Unbalanced data Non representative data catarina-alves Catarina-Alves Unsupervised Learning Real time classification Anomaly detection Large datasets 2 Data science for Physics & Astronomy Adrian Bevan Particle physics experimentalist with a keen interest in DS & AI Parameter estimation: ● 2 decades of likelihood fitting experience spanning NA48, BaBar and ATLAS experiments; currently using ML on the ATLAS and MoEDAL experiments @ LHC. ● Latest relevant work: https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rsta.2019.0392 Machine learning: ● Broad interest in algorithms: domains of validity to understand what to use when and why to optimise the use of algorithms for a given problem domain. Have used SVMs, BDTs, MLPs, CNNs, Deep Networks, KNN for analysis work. ● Working on understanding why algorithms make a given inference or decision based on input feature space (explainability and interpretability). ● Want to explore unsupervised learning and bayesian networks when an appropriate problem presents itself. Have taught or currently teach data science and machine learning undergrad and grad courses. [email protected] 3 Data science for Physics & Astronomy David Berman 4 Data science for Physics & Astronomy Richard Bielby 5 Data science for Nachiketa Chakraborty Physics & Astronomy
    [Show full text]
  • The Very Small Array: Latest Results and Future Plans
    The Very Small Array: latest results and future plans Keith Grainge Astrophysics Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge Rencontres de Moriond, 31 March 2004 OVERVIEW The Very Small Array (VSA) • Current primordial observations • The S-Z effect • Planned upgrades to the instrument • Future science at high ` • Summary • 1 THE VSA CONSORTIUM Cavendish Astrophysics Group Roger Boysen Tony Brown Chris Clementson Mike Crofts Jerry Czeres Roger Dace Keith Grainge (PM) Mike Hobson (PI) Mike Jones Rüdiger Kneissl Katy Lancaster Anthony Lasenby Klaus Maisinger Ian Northrop Guy Pooley Vic Quy Nutan Rajguru Ben Rusholme Richard Saunders Richard Savage Anna Scaife Jack Schofield Paul Scott (Former PI) Clive Shaw Anze Slosar Angela Taylor David Titterington Elizabeth Waldram Brian Wood Jodrell Bank Observatory Colin Baines Richard Battye Eddie Blackhurst Pedro Carreira Kieran Cleary Rod Davies Richard Davis Clive Dickinson Yaser Hafez Mark Polkey Bob Watson Althea Wilkinson Instituto de Astrofísica de Canarias Jose Alberto Rubiño-Martin Carlos Guiterez Rafa Rebolo Lopez Pedro Sosa-Molina Ricardo Genova-Santos 2 THE VERY SMALL ARRAY (VSA) Sited on Observatorio del Teide, Tenerife • 14 antennas 91 baselines • ) Observing frequency ν = 26 36 GHz; bandwidth ∆ν = 1:5 GHz • − Compact configuration: 143 mm horns; ` = 150 800; ∆` 90 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2000 – Sept 2001 Extended configuration: 322 mm horns; ` = 300 1800; ∆` 200 (without • − ≈ mosaicing); Sept 2001 – present 3 COMPARISON WITH OTHER CMB EXPERIMENTS Different systematics from “single-dish” experiments: • – negligible pointing error – negligible beam uncertainty Different from other CMB interferometers (DASI, CBI): • – RT survey and dedicated source subtraction 2-element interferometer remove effect of extragalactic point sources ) – tracking elements rather than comounted can apply fringe rate filter to remove unwanted signals.
    [Show full text]
  • Full White Paper
    LIGO SCIENTIFIC COLLABORATION VIRGO COLLABORATION Document Type LIGO–T1400054 VIR-0176A-14 The LSC-Virgo White Paper on Gravitational Wave Searches and Astrophysics (2014-2015 edition) The LSC-Virgo Search Groups, the Data Analysis Software Working Group, the Detector Characterization Working Group and the Computing Committee WWW: http://www.ligo.org/ and http://www.virgo.infn.it Processed with LATEX on 2014/11/21 The LSC-Virgo White Paper on Gravitational Wave Searches and Astrophysics Contents 1 The LSC-Virgo White Paper on Data Analysis 4 1.1 Searches for Signals from Compact Binary Coalescences . .5 1.2 Searches for Generic Transients, or Bursts . .7 1.3 Searches for Continuous Wave Signals . .9 1.4 Searches for Stochastic Gravitational Wave Backgrounds . 11 1.5 Characterization of the Detectors and their Data . 13 1.6 Data Calibration . 15 1.7 Hardware Injections . 16 1.8 Computing and Software . 17 2 Previous Accomplishments (2013-2014) 19 2.1 Burst Working Group . 19 2.2 Compact Binary Coalescences Working Group . 19 2.3 Continuous Waves Group . 20 2.4 Stochastic Group . 21 2.5 Detector Characterization . 21 3 Search Plans for the Advanced Detector Era 23 3.1 All-Sky Burst Search . 24 3.2 Search For Binary Neutron Star Coalescences . 29 3.3 Search for Stellar-Mass Binary Black Hole Coalescences . 37 3.4 Search For Neutron Star – Black Hole Coalescences . 45 3.5 Search for GRB Sources of Transient Gravitational Waves . 57 3.6 Search for Intermediate Mass Black Hole Binary Coalescences . 64 3.7 All-sky Searches for Isolated Spinning Neutron Stars .
    [Show full text]
  • BINGO: HI Intensity Mapping Using a Novel Single-Dish Radio Telescope
    BINGO: HI Intensity Mapping using a novel single-dish radio telescope Tianyue Chen (on behalf of the BINGO collaboration) Supervisors: Prof. Clive Dickinson Prof. Richard Battye Prof. Ian Browne Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics The University of Manchester Nov 2016, Durban, South Africa Introduction • Era of “precision cosmology” Planck Collaboration, 2013, XV • ΛCDM model works very well • Cosmological parameters - ~1% precision (mostly from CMB) • The future - testing and refining this model: • New cosmological probes (e.g., BAOs) • Combining multiple probes Baryon Acoustic Oscillations (BAOs) • What is it? Acoustic waves imprinted on CMB Imprint on all matter in the Universe • Why BAO? Precisely known acoustic scale D= 147.4±0.3 Mpc Standard ruler --- Universe expansion vs. redshift --- Constrain dark energy • Requirement? Limited by statistics --- require large sample size (HI) Intensity Mapping in a nut-shell • What is Intensity Mapping Keywords: Emission line Large scale structure fluctuations Unresolved individual galaxies • Benefits Relatively cheap and efficient 3D information --- 2D angular size + 1D redshift (obs. Freq.) HI - Good tracer of mass on LSS Large beam on the sky (~1 deg) contains large number of galaxies The HI (21cm) power spectrum Battye et al 2013 Intensity Mapping with SKA Single-dish (“autocorrelation”) mode -- lower z, more sensitive! Bull et al. (2015) BINGO Concept BAOs In Neutral Gas Observations • Key Specifications: • Dish diameter : 40 m • Resolution: ~2/3 deg • Frequency range : 960 - 1260 MHz (z=0.12-0.48)
    [Show full text]
  • Superclass – II. Photometric Redshifts and Characteristics of Spatially Resolved Μjy Radio Sources
    MNRAS 495, 1724–1736 (2020) doi:10.1093/mnras/staa657 Advance Access publication 2020 April 2 SuperCLASS – II. Photometric redshifts and characteristics of spatially resolved μJy radio sources Sinclaire M. Manning ,1‹ Caitlin M. Casey ,1 Chao-Ling Hung ,2 Richard Battye ,3 Michael L. Brown,3 Neal Jackson,3 Filipe Abdalla ,4 Scott Chapman,5 Downloaded from https://academic.oup.com/mnras/article/495/2/1724/5815091 by University College London user on 09 December 2020 Constantinos Demetroullas,3,6 Patrick Drew ,1 Christopher A. Hales,7,8 Ian Harrison ,3,9 Christopher J. Riseley ,10,11,12 David B. Sanders 13 and Robert A. Watson3 1Department of Astronomy, The University of Texas at Austin, 2515 Speedway Boulevard Stop C1400, Austin, TX 78712, USA 2Physics Department, Manhattan College, 4513 Manhattan College Pkwy, Bronx, NY 10471, USA 3Jodrell Bank Centre for Astrophysics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, University College London, Gower Place, London WC1E 6BT, UK 5Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, NS B3H 4R2, Canada 6Cyprus University of Technology, Archiepiskopou Kyprianou 30, Limassol 3036, Cyprus 7National, Radio Astronomy Observatory, P.O. Box 0, Socorro, NM 87801, USA 8School of Mathematics, Statistics and Physics, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK 9Department of Physics, University of Oxford, Denys Wilkinson Building, Keble Road, Oxford OX1 3RH, UK 10Dipartimento di Fisica e Astronomia, Universita` degli Studi di Bologna, via P. Gobetti 93/2, I-40129 Bologna, Italy 11INAF – Istituto di Radioastronomia, via P. Gobetti 101, I-40129 Bologna, Italy 12CSIRO Astronomy and Space Science, P.O.
    [Show full text]