DOCSLIB.ORG

Targhee National Forest Targhee National Forest LIST of ACRONYMS USED in the REVISED FOREST PLAN

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Targhee National Forest Targhee National Forest LIST of ACRONYMS USED in the REVISED FOREST PLAN United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Intermountain Region Targhee National Forest Targhee National Forest LIST OF ACRONYMS USED IN THE REVISED FOREST PLAN AMP Allotment Management Plan AMS Analysis of The Management Situation AOP Annual Operating Plan (Annual Plan of Operations) ASQ Allowable Sale Quantity ATV All Terrain Vehicle AUM Animal Unit Month BLM Bureau of Land Management C&H Cattle and Horse (Allotment) DFC Desired Future Condition EM Ecosystem Management GIS Geographic Information System GYCC Greater Yellowstone Coordinating Committee IDT Interdisciplinary Team IGBC Interagency Grizzly Bear Committee IGBG Interagency Grizzly Bear Guidelines INFISH Inland Native Fish Strategy MBF Thousand Board Feet MIS Management Indicator Species MIST Minimum Impact Suppression Tactics MMBF Million Board Feet NEPA National Environmental Policy Act NFMA National Forest Management Act NRCS Natural Resources Conservation Service OHV Off-Highway Vehicle PACFISH Anadromous Fish Habitat and Watershed Conservation Strategy PAOT Persons At One Time PFC Properly Functioning Condition ROD Record of Decision ROS Recreation Opportunity Spectrum RPD Rangeland Project Decision RVD Recreation Visitor Day S&G Sheep and Goat (Allotment) T&E Threatened and Endangered VQO Visual Quality Objective WFUD Wildlife and Fish User Day REVISED FOREST PLAN for the TARGHEE NATIONAL FOREST Intermountain Region R-4 April 1997 Lead Agency USDA - Forest Service Targhee National Forest PO BOX208 St Anthony, ID 83445 Responsible Official Dale N Bosworth Intermountain Region USDA Forest Service 324 25th Street Ogden, UT 84401 For Further Information Contact JerryB Reese Targhee National Forest PO Box208 St Anthony, ID 83445 (208) 624-3151 (208) 624-4049 (fax) This Rewed Earest Plan was prepared according to Secretary of Agriculture regulations (36 CFR 219), which are based on the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act of 1976 (NFMA) This Revised Forest Plan was developed in accordance with regulations (40 CFR 1500) for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) A detailed Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) has been prepared as required by NEPA and 36 CFR 219 If any particular provision of this Revised Plan, or the application of the action to any person or circum- stances, is found to be invalid, the remainder of the proposed action and the application of that provision to other persons or circumstances shall not be affected The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, and marital or familial status (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs ) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (braille, large print, audiotape, etc ) should contact the USDA Office of Communications at (202) 720-2791 To file a complaint, write the Secretary of Agriculture. U S Department of Agriculture, Washington, D C 20250, or call 1-800-245-6340 (voice) or (202) 720-1127 (TDD) USDA is an equal opportunity em- ployer Please recycle this document when it IS ready to be discarded TABLE OF CONTENTS Table of Contents Contents-I List of Figures Contents-2 Chapter I Forest Plan Revision Introduction Purpose of the Forest Plan Revision 1-1 Revision Structure 1-2 Location of the Forest 1-3 Chapter II Summary of the Analysis of the Management Situation Introduction 11-1 Purpose of Preparing an AMS 11-1 Primary Emphasis of the Plan 11-1 Results of Monitoring 11-1 Public Interaction and DFC 11-2 New Information 11-3 Need for Change 11-3 Chapter 111 Forestwide Standards and Guidelines, St section Direction, i Management Prescriptions Introduction 111-2 Part 1 - Forestwide Standards and Guidelines 111-4 Part 2 - Subsection Descriptions and Direction 111-34 Lemhi/Medicine Lodge Subsection (M332Ek) 111-38 Centennial Mountains Subsection (M332Ea) 111-42 Island Park Subsection (M331Aa) 111-46 Madison-Pitchstone Plateaus Subsection (M331Ab) 111-50 Teton Range Subsection (M331Db) 111-54 Big Hole Mountains Subsection (M331Dk) 111-58 Caribou Range Mountains Subsection (M331Di) 111-62 Part 3 - Management Prescriptions 111-65 Chapter IV Implementation Forest Timber Schedule 1v-1 Chapter V Monitoring and Evaluation Introduction v-1 Relationship to Other Monitoring Activities v-1 Types of Monitoring v-1 Items to be Monitored v-2 Monitoring and the Budget v-2 Monitoring Item Summary v-3 How the Monitoring Information Will be Used v-5 Contents - 1 Appendix A - National Direction Relevant to Land and Resource Management A- 1 Appendix B - U S Fish and Wildlife Service Biological Opinion 6-1 Literature Cited, References R-1 Glossary G-1 LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1-1 Vicinity Map of Targhee National Forest on a National Scale 1-4 FIGURE 1-2 Vicinity Map of the Targhee National Forest and the Surrounding Area 1-5 FIGURE 111-1 Subsection Overlay on the Targhee National Forest and the Surrounding Area 111-36 FIGURE 111-2 Targhee National Forest Principal Watersheds 111-37 FIGURE 111-3 Lemhi/Medicine Lodge Subsection (M332Ek) 111-39 FIGURE 111-4 Centennial Mountains Subsection (M332Ea) 111-43 FIGURE 111-5 Island Park Subsection (M331Aa) 111-47 FIGURE 111-6 Madison-Pitchstone Plateaus Subsection (M331Ab) 111-51 FIGURE 111-7 Teton Range Subsection (M331Db) 111-55 FIGURE 111-8 Big Hole Mountains Subsection (M331Dk) 111-59 FIGURE 111-9 Caribou Range Mountains Subsection (M331Di) 111-63 Contents - 2 Chapter Revised Forest Plan 1n traduction -- I CHAPTER I FOREST PLAN REVISION INTRODUCTION a PURPOSE OF THE LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN (FOREST PLAN REVISION) This Revised Forest Plan (Revision, or Plan) guides all natural resource management activities and establishes management standards for the Targhee National Forest (hereinafter referred to as "the Forest") The Revision embodies the provisions of the Forest and Rangeland Renewable Resources Planning Act (RPA) as amended by the National Forest Management Act (NFMA), Endangered Spe- cies Act (ESA), and other guiding documents The forestwide standards and guidelines, subsection direction and management prescriptions state the Revision's management direction, however, the project outputs, services, and rates of implementation are dependent on the annual budgeting process The Forest Plan will be revised every 10-15years, or sooner should conditions or demands significantly change Development of the Revision occurs within the overall framework of both National and Regional Plan- ning The Revision and accompanying Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) are "tiered to the Inter- mountain Regional Guide Regional planning is a two-way street that helps convey direction from Na- tional to the Forest level, and helps transmit information from the Forest to the National level The Regional Guide establishes standards and guidelines, and resolves Regional issues During the Revision process, alternatives were developed, analyzed, compared, and a preferred alter- native selected This Revision is based on the "selected alternative" displayed in the accompanying Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) The planning process and analysis procedures used in devel- oping this Revised Plan, as well as the other management alternatives that were considered, are de- scribed or referenced in the EIS In the development of the alternatives, estimates were made based on a broad averages, as to the various activities and resulting outputs of implementingthat alternative These estimates were used to compare alternatives and to arrive at the preferred alternative Actual outputs may vary slightly from those displayed in the preferred alternative, however, the intent of the preferred alternative will be met Revised Forest Plan direction serves as an "umbrella" for the environmental analysis for proposed projects at the Forest and Ranger District levels Future environmental analyses for those projects will refer to this Plan, the accompanying EIS, and related documents wherever possible (the travel plan will be implemented by a separate decision based on the EIS associated with this Plan) Analysis and decision documents will be developed for project level activities not specifically described in this Plan and will concentrate on issues unique to the project Landscape or watershed analysis is one means of implementing Revised Forest Plan direction It is not a process independent of the Plan, but fits under the Plan "umbrella" This process evaluates ecologi- cal, social, and economic conditions-present and historical-at a geographic scale between the entire Targhee National Forest and a much smaller individual project area It generally assesses conditions at a watershed (such as Camas Creek) or subsection (such as Centennial Mountains) scale This assess- ment precedes analysis and decision-making on individual project proposals in the landscape analysis area Subsequent site-specific project analyses use the broader scale analysis to set the context for the proposed activities and their anticipated results Most projects will not be preceded by a landscape analysis because it is an intense analysis process a However, landscape analysis may be helpful for w - identifying and evaluating ecosystems in properly functioning condition and systems at risk, - providing baseline data and information for project planning, - understanding the role of historical processes and patterns within which current management actions
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Stenapa Newsletter
    STENAPA NEWSLETTER ST. EUSTATIUS NATIONAL PARKS OFFICE Her Royal Highness Princess Beatrix of the Netherlands visit- ed the St Eustatius National Parks Foundation (STENAPA) E v e n t s Office on Friday, December 13th. The Princess came from 2020 Made in Statia where On-site Manager, Adam Mitchell, spoke with her about the Reforestation Project. Read more about Marine Park the Reforestation Project on page 5. Info Series Annual Cleanup 2019 in a few words... ICCD We would say that it was a year of new faces and fresh approaches. Several staff members joined the team at the beginning of the year. Kids A nature agreement with the government was signed mid year as Summer Club the previous Director Clarissa Buma said goodbye to the team. Tak- Lionfish Fry ing up the reins of Director was biologist Erik Boman who was im- mediately tasked with upgrading operations from the injection of And MORE! funds released by the nature agreement. New board members also joined our ranks with Dr. Dorette Courtar becoming our Board Pres- Miriam C. Schmidt ident. Botanical Garden Continue reading our newsletter to see what the Parks, Garden, Re- Bird watching forestation Project and Education/Outreach have been up to! Birthdays Family Reunions The STENAPA Team Graduation Erik Boman Director Movie Nights Jessica Berkel Marine Park Manager School trips Francois Mille Marine Park Ranger Marit Pistor Marine Park Ranger Team Building Ervin Arnaud Botanical Garden Ranger Rupnor Redan Terrestrial Ranger Weddings Achsah Mitchell Education and Outreach Officer Workshops Adam Mitchell On-site Manager (ReforeStatia) $75 [$25 returned if Philippa King Reforestation Ranger left in a good state] NATIONAL MARINE PARK Unlike larger islands, St Eustatius is able to protect all of our surrounding waters with the National Ma- rine Park (up to a depth of 30 m).
    [Show full text]
  • Water Storage Projects Committee Meeting Materials | August 8, 2013
    Henrys Fork Basin Study Update Idaho Water Resource Board Water Storage Projects Committee \ uA H o ~ ~ " Cynthia Bridge Clark ; "~ O:Jo August 8, 2013 "' <l'tsou1<C Background • State Authorization: • House Joint Memorial No 8 • Senate Bill 1511 approved by 2008 Idaho Legislature • Comprehensive State Water Plan • Federal Authority: • Department of Interior’s WaterSmart Program – Basin Study Program • Undertake comprehensive studies in cooperation with local partners • Basin Study MOA executed in March 2011 (IWRB and USBOR) • Study objectives: Identify additional water supplies and improvements in water management through surface storage, managed recharge, water marketing, and conservation, while sustaining environmental quality. Study Area • Henrys Fork Watershed (3,300 sq mi) – Parts of Fremont, Madison and Teton counties. • Four major subbasins – Upper Henrys Fork, Lower Henrys Fork, Teton River, and Fall River • Land use – forestland, rangeland, irrigated cropland, dryland agriculture and other urban developments • Fish & Wildlife – populations of native Yellowstone cutthroat trout, nonnative rainbow trout, and brown trout Variety of large and small mammals and birds Water Supply • Surface water supply Henrys Fork River largest tributary of the Snake The total Henrys Fork watershed discharge is 2.5 million af/yr under natural, unregulated conditions - Falls River contributes 700,000af/yr - Teton River contributes over 600,000 af/yr 1.6 million af/yr is discharged after the Henrys Fork basin diversions, seepage and evapotranspiration
    [Show full text]
  • LIFE on the FRONTLINE 2018 a Global Survey of the Working Conditions of Rangers PROJECT TEAM Mike Belecky, Rohit Singh & William Moreto
    REPORT 2018 LIFE ON THE FRONTLINE 2018 A global survey of the working conditions of rangers PROJECT TEAM Mike Belecky, Rohit Singh & William Moreto SPECIAL THANKS Rob Parry-Jones, Mike Baltzer, Drew McVey & Alain Ononino LAYOUT, DESIGN & ILLUSTRATION Catalyze COVER PHOTO © Greg Armfield / WWF © Simon Rawles / WWF-UK Published in October 2018 Disclaimer: The responses provided by rangers in this survey do not necessarily represent the position of WWF. 2 | Life on the Frontline CONTENTS Forewords 1 Dedication to Rangers 3 Executive Summary 5 The Ranger Survey In Context 7 Methodology Summary 9 Country Survey Sites 11 Global Overview 13 Africa 27 South Asia 39 Southeast Asia 51 Further Regional Comparison 63 China / Russia Tiger Landscape Case Study 65 Latin America Preview Survey 66 Recommendations 67 Acknowledgements 69 Life on the Frontline | 3 Forewords Sustainable Development Goal 15 aims to wildlife, the ILO will host a sectoral meeting on promoting decent work “protect, restore and promote sustainable use and safety and health in forestry in 2019. of terrestrial ecosystems, [and] sustainably manage forests.” When adopting this Goal To mark the centenary of the ILO in 2019, the International Labour among only 17 Sustainable Development Conference has decided to adopt a Convention and a Recommendation Goals, the international community on violence and harassment in the workplace, which is a main concern recognized that it must take action to protect of this report. During the first discussions in 2018, the workers’ the ecosystems that are home to more than representatives pointed out that violence at work may stem from public servants’ interaction with third parties, especially in dealing with 80 per cent of the terrestrial species of animals.
    [Show full text]
  • Trumpeter Swan Survey of the Rocky Mountain Population Winter 2012
    Trumpeter Swan Survey of the Rocky Mountain Population Winter 2012 Acknowledgements Personnel who conducted the survey are listed in Appendix C. The survey is a collaborative effort among Red Rock Lakes NWR, Migratory Birds and State Programs -- Mountain-Prairie Region of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Southeast Idaho National Wildlife Refuge Complex, National Elk Refuge, Harriman State Park, Idaho Department of Fish and Game, Grand Teton National Park, Yellowstone National Park, Wyoming Game and Fish Department, Ruby Lake NWR, Malheur NWR, and the Shoshone-Bannock Tribes. Additionally, R. Cavallaro, M. Wackenhut, D. Christopherson, K. Cameron, and R. Lonsinger, assisted with counts in Idaho. S. Patla, N. Cadwell, D. Smith, M. St. Louis, and K. Cutting provided information and narratives used to develop this document; conclusions are attributable only to the author. TRUMPETER SWAN SURVEY of the ROCKY MOUNTAIN POPULATION WINTER 2012 U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Migratory Birds and State Programs Mountain-Prairie Region Lakewood, Colorado May 1, 2012 4 Abstract.B Observers counted 6,331 swans (white birds and cygnets) in the Rocky Mountain Population of trumpeter swans during late January and early February 2012, which was an 11% increase from the 5,712 counted during winter 2011. The number of white birds (4,783) increased by 9% from the 2011 counts while the number of cygnets (1,028) experienced a 22% decrease. In the tri-state area, the number of total swans increased for Idaho (59%) and decreased for Montana (- 33%) and Wyoming (-19%) from counts in 2011. The number of birds wintering in areas near restoration flocks increased by 18% from 2011 and was the highest count since 1996.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ranger School
    The Ranger School State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry Wanakena, New York The SUNY-ESF Ranger School in Wanakena, N.Y., offers students a unique educational experience in a spectacular natural setting. The Ranger School, part of the State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry (ESF), confers the associate in applied science (A.A.S.) degree. The A.A.S. degree can open doors to forest technology, natural resources conservation or land surveying technology careers or it can serve as a hands-on, experience-based step toward a bachelor of science degree. The Ranger School’s one-plus-one plan allows students to complete their first- year degree requirements at the college of their choice, including ESF’s Syracuse campus if admitted as a first-year student. The second-year degree requirements are completed at The Ranger School. Many graduates continue on to complete a bach- elor’s degree program at the ESF Syracuse campus or other colleges and universities. The 2,800-acre campus, located in the heart of the six million-acre Adirondack Park, supports the field-based, hands-on education which is a hallmark of The Ranger School experience. Students learn to use equipment and tools specific to their academic program. The main campus building houses state-of-the-art facilities including classrooms, conference room, library, drafting lab and computer lab. Students also live in the building sharing comfortable residence hall rooms, eating and socializing in the dining center and spending their free time in the enter- tainment and recreation areas.
    [Show full text]
  • Forest Processes 3Rd - 4Th Grade Field Trip Preparing for Your Trip
    National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glacier National Park Forest Processes 3rd - 4th Grade Field Trip Preparing For Your Trip 1 National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Glacier National Park Table of Contents Forest Processes 3rd-4th Grade Field Trip Read this FIRST! Dear Teacher ...................................................................................................... 3 Glacier’s Education Goals ................................................................................ 3 Suggested 5-Day Lesson Sequence around Field Trip ................................. 4 Preparing for Your Lesson 1- Pre-Visit- Mature Forest Mime ..................................................... 5 Field Trip Lesson 2- Pre-Visit- Old Growth Forest Mural ............................................. 8 Field Trip Information Field Trip- Objectives and Vocabulary ......................................................... 10 Field Trip- Schedule for the Day and Standards Alignment ..................... 11 Field Trip- Tips for a Successful Field Trip ................................................... 12 Field Trip- Chaperon Guidelines to Share with Parents ............................ 13 Field Trip- Sample Evaluation of Ranger and How Day Went ................. 14 Field Trip- Sample Ranger Evaluation of Class and How Day Went ........ 15 After Your Field Trip Lesson 3- Post- Visit- Forest Poems .............................................................. 16 Appendix Additional Teacher Background Information .............................................
    [Show full text]
  • Wildland Urban Interface Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared For: Elk Creek Fire Protection District Conifer, Colorado
    Wildland Urban Interface Community Wildfire Protection Plan Prepared for: Elk Creek Fire Protection District Conifer, Colorado Submitted By: Anchor Point Boulder, Colorado September 2005 TABLE OF CONTENTS PURPOPSE....................................................................................................................................................... 1 GOALS AND OBJECTIVES ............................................................................................................................... 1 OTHER DESIRED OUTCOMES ......................................................................................................................... 1 UNDERSTANDING THIS DOCUMENT ....................................................................................................... 3 THE NATIONAL FIRE PLAN ............................................................................................................................ 3 STUDY AREA PROFILE ................................................................................................................................ 5 VALUES......................................................................................................................................................... 10 PRIORITIZED VALUES TO BE PROTECTED ................................................................................................... 10 CURRENT RISK SITUATION...................................................................................................................... 13 FIRE REGIME AND
    [Show full text]
  • Junior Ranger Activity Book, National Park of American Samoa
    National Park of American Samoa Paka Fa’asao o Amerika Samoa Junior Ranger Activity Book This Book Belongs to (O le Tusi Lenei a) ______________________________________________ Name (Igoa) Age (Tausaga) Become a Junior Ranger Hello! (Talofa!) ThisJunior Ranger Activity Book is a great way to have fun and learn about the National Park of American Samoa and the National Park Service. It’s also a way that you can help park rangers take care of this very special place. Ages 5 and under: Complete 3 Activities Ages 6 to 9: Complete 6 Activities Ages 10 and up: Complete 8 Activities National Park of American Samoa When you finish, take your activity book to the visitor center to get your Paka Fa’asao o Amerika Samoa This certifies that certificate and badge. If you don’t finish your book while you’re here, you can mail it to us. We’ll check it and send your book back to you along with _______________________________________________________________________________has completed the required activities and is granted the title of Junior Ranger Official Park Stamp your certificate and badge. ___________________________________________ Junior Ranger Signature ___________________________________________ Junior Ranger Pledge Park Ranger Signature Mail it to: As a Junior Ranger, I promise to explore, learn about, and help protect the National Park of American Samoa and all national parks. Protecting the parks means I will share what I have learned with others and “leave no trace” by staying on trails and picking up trash. By reducing, reusing, and recycling, I pledge to be a friend to national parks and to our planet Earth.
    [Show full text]
  • Historic Resource Study
    Historic Resource Study Minidoka Internment National Monument _____________________________________________________ Prepared for the National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Seattle, Washington Minidoka Internment National Monument Historic Resource Study Amy Lowe Meger History Department Colorado State University National Park Service U.S. Department of the Interior Seattle, Washington 2005 Table of Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………………… i Note on Terminology………………………………………….…………………..…. ii List of Figures ………………………………………………………………………. iii Part One - Before World War II Chapter One - Introduction - Minidoka Internment National Monument …………... 1 Chapter Two - Life on the Margins - History of Early Idaho………………………… 5 Chapter Three - Gardening in a Desert - Settlement and Development……………… 21 Chapter Four - Legalized Discrimination - Nikkei Before World War II……………. 37 Part Two - World War II Chapter Five- Outcry for Relocation - World War II in America ………….…..…… 65 Chapter Six - A Dust Covered Pseudo City - Camp Construction……………………. 87 Chapter Seven - Camp Minidoka - Evacuation, Relocation, and Incarceration ………105 Part Three - After World War II Chapter Eight - Farm in a Day- Settlement and Development Resume……………… 153 Chapter Nine - Conclusion- Commemoration and Memory………………………….. 163 Appendixes ………………………………………………………………………… 173 Bibliography…………………………………………………………………………. 181 Cover: Nikkei working on canal drop at Minidoka, date and photographer unknown, circa 1943. (Minidoka Manuscript Collection, Hagerman Fossil
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 15: Wildland Fire
    Chapter 15: Wildland Fire When Everglades National Park was established in 1947, the long-standing NPS policy was to suppress all wildfires in parks, whether caused by lightning or human activity. The NPS was not alone in this; at the time, fire suppression was standard pol- icy for all federal government land managers. NPS fire policies had been developed in the forests of the western states and for the most part echoed the policies of the U.S. Forest Service. The geology and vegetation of South Florida, as well as the region’s cultural attitudes and practices regarding fire, differed sharply from the western experi- ence. Additionally, combating fires with traditional techniques exposed Everglades fire fighters to considerable hardship and danger, because of the region’s solution holes, exposed limestone rock, sawgrass, palmetto, muck, and insects. All of these factors produced a relationship with fire at Everglades National Park that was unique within the Service. The park played a key role in the evolution of national wildland fire pol- icies. Research done in the Everglades by park biologist Dr. Bill Robertson Jr. in the 1950s added much to the general understanding of the role of fire in ecosystems and led to the park’s program of prescribed burning, the first such program in the NPS. The Everglades fire experience then helped to shape what historian Stephen J. Pyne has called fire’s “cultural revolution” in the 1960s and thereafter. In this revolution, the idea that fires should be prevented whenever possible and always fought when they broke out gave way to an understanding that: 1) fire was a part of the natural order, 2) some fires should be allowed to burn, and 3) prescribed burns were often beneficial.
    [Show full text]
  • Regulations Governing the Public Use of Washington State Parks
    PARK RULES Regulations Governing the Public Use of Washington State Parks Washington State Parks and Recreation Commission Table of Contents Page Chapter 352-32 WAC Public Use of State Park Areas (04/20/2016) .......................................................................................... 1 Chapter 352-12 WAC Moorage and Use of Marine and Inland Water Facilities (11/20/2008) ........................................................................................ 26 Chapter 352-20 WAC Use of Motor Driven Vehicles in State Parks–Parking Restrictions–Violations (11/30/2005) ........................................................................................ 28 Commission Policy/Procedure 65-13-1 Use of Other Power-Driven Mobility Devices by Persons with Disabilities at State Park Facilities (Commission Action date: 8/8/2013) .................................................. 30 Chapter 352-37 WAC Ocean Beaches (06/24/2016) ........................................................................................ 40 Chapter 352-32 Chapter 352-32 WAC PUBLIC USE OF STATE PARK AREAS WAC DISPOSITION OF SECTIONS FORMERLY 352-32-010 Definitions. CODIFIED IN THIS CHAPTER 352-32-01001 Feeding wildlife. 352-32-011 Dress standards. 352-32-020 Police powers granted to certain employees. [Order 35, 352-32-030 Camping. § 352-32-020, filed 7/29/77; Order 9, § 352-32-020, 352-32-037 Environmental learning centers (ELCs). filed 11/24/70.] Repealed by WSR 82-07-076 (Order 352-32-040 Picnicking. 56), filed 3/23/82. Statutory Authority: RCW 43.51.040. 352-32-045 Reservations for use of designated group facilities. 352-32-035 Campsite reservation. [Statutory Authority: RCW 352-32-047 Special recreation event permit. 43.51.040(2). WSR 95-14-004, § 352-32-035, filed 352-32-050 Park periods. 6/21/95, effective 7/22/95. Statutory Authority: RCW 352-32-053 Park capacities.
    [Show full text]
  • Columbia River Basin Climate Impact Assessment Final Report
    RECLAMATION Managing Water in the West West-Wide Climate Risk Assessment Columbia River Basin Climate Impact Assessment Final Report \ / --~-- U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Pacific Northwest Regional Office March 2016 Mission Statements The U.S. Department of the Interior protects America’s natural resources and heritage, honors our cultures and tribal communities, and supplies the energy to power our future. The mission of the Bureau of Reclamation is to manage, develop, and protect water and related resources in an environmentally and economically sound manner in the interest of the American public. Photographs on front cover: The shrub-steppe around Grand Coulee Dam, parched desert soil, a crop field with rain clouds, and snow covered mountain peaks. These images represent the varied ecosystems in the Columbia River Basin. West-Wide Climate Risk Assessment Columbia River Basin Climate Impact Assessment Final Report Prepared for United States Congress Prepared by U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation Policy and Administration Denver, Colorado March 2016 Notes Regarding this West-Wide Climate Risk Assessment – Impact Assessment The Columbia River Basin Impact Assessment is a reconnaissance-level assessment of the potential hydrologic impacts of climate change in the Columbia River Basin. For this study, it was necessary to isolate the impacts of climate change from other changes that may occur within the basin. Therefore, Reclamation has assumed that current water operations by all water management entities in the Columbia River Basin would continue unchanged in the future. This assessment does not consider any operational changes that may or may not be made by basin stakeholders in the future and does not reflect the position of any entity regarding future operational changes.
    [Show full text]