DOCSLIB.ORG

Teaching Stamina & Silent READING

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Teaching Stamina & Silent READING Teaching Stamina & Silent Reading in the Digital-Global Age Edited by Elfrieda H. Hiebert Teaching Stamina and Silent Reading in the Digital-Global Age EDITED BY Elfrieda H. Hiebert TextProject University of California, Santa Cruz Reading Essentials Original Series June 2015 TextProject, Inc. SANTA CRUZ, CALIFORNIA textproject.org ISBN: 978-1-937889-04-3 © 2015 Elfrieda H. Hiebert. Some rights reserved. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution- Noncommercial-No Derivative Works 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/us/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 171 Second Street, Suite 300, San Francisco, California, 94105, USA. “TextProject” and the TextProject logo are trademarks of TextProject, Inc. Cover photo (top) © istockphoto.com/CEFutcher. All rights reserved. Used under license. Cover photo (bottom) © istockphoto.com/CEFutcher. All rights reserved. Used under license. Contents FORWARD iii Striking the Right Balance: Why Silent and Extended Reading of Challenging Materials Matters Timothy Rasinski Preface vii Teaching Stamina and Silent Reading in the Digital-Global Age Elfrieda H. Hiebert I. UNDERSTANDING THE PROBLEM & THE CONSTRUCT CHAPTER 1 16 The Forgotten Reading Proficiency: Stamina In Silent Reading Elfrieda H. Hiebert CHAPTER 2 32 Eye Movements Make Reading Possible S. Jay Samuels, Elfrieda H. Hiebert, & Timothy Rasinski CHAPTER 3 58 Are Students Really Reading in Independent Reading Contexts? An Examination of Comprehension-Based Silent Reading Rate Elfrieda H. Hiebert, Kathleen M. Wilson & Guy Trainin II. INSTRUCTION AND PRACTICES THAT FOSTER STAMINA AND SILENT READING CHAPTER 4 79 Stretching Elementary Students in Complex Text: Why? How? When? Heidi Anne E. Mesmer i CHAPTER 5 100 The Relationship Between a Silent Reading Fluency Instructional Protocol on Students’ Reading Comprehension and Achievement in an Urban School Setting Timothy V. Rasinski, S. Jay Samuels, Elfrieda H. Hiebert, Yaacov Petscher, & Karen Feller CHAPTER 6 121 Exploring the Added Value of a Guided Silent Reading Intervention: Effects on Struggling Third-Grade Readers’ Achievement D. Ray Reutzel, Yaacov Petscher, & Alexandra N. Spichtig III: LOOKING AHEAD CHAPTER 7 147 Comprehension-Based Silent Reading Rates: What Do We Know? What Do We Need To Know? Elfrieda H. Hiebert, S. Jay Samuels, & Timothy V. Rasinski CHAPTER 8 169 Revisiting Silent Reading in 2020 and Beyond Elfrieda H. Hiebert, & D. Ray Reutzel ii FORWARD Striking the Right Balance: Why Silent and Extended Reading of Challenging Materials Matters Timothy Rasinski Kent State University ver the past dozen years or so, reading assessment and reading instruction itself increasingly have come to be defined primarily by oral reading, often for speed, and for very short periods Oof time. This evolution has been due to a number of factors. First, the curriculum-based measurement (CBM) approach to reading assessment reduced reading assessment to measures of reading rate over one-minute periods (Deno, 1985). Second, although the National Reading Panel (National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, 2000) identified reading fluency as a critical variable for proficient reading, the panel restricted fluency to oral reading. These developments, as well as others, have affected how reading is being taught. In many primary and intermediate classrooms around the country, oral reading is the predominant form of reading. Time is allocated to daily fluency instruction where students read a short passage repeatedly for the primary purpose of reading it faster. This practice is accompanied by regular assessments of students’ reading (as often as weekly in some classrooms) on the number of words students can read correctly in a minute on an instructional-level passage. These developments in reading instruction are based on a solid foundation of research and indeed I feel there is a legitimate place for them in the classroom. Reading rate as determined by CBMs and other similar one-minute readings of short passages is a good measure of word- recognition automaticity, a critical factor in comprehension. Oral reading experiences, especially authentic oral experiences, such as the recitation of poetry or the performance of a script, have been shown to improve reading fluency and overall reading proficiency. However, these are not the only instructional factors that must be considered for effective reading and reading instruction. Most reading done by adults is silent reading. As such, it is not Rasinski iii unreasonable to expect students to receive instruction and support in silent reading in their classrooms. Further, a fair amount of adult reading consists of lengthy texts. Again, therefore, it is not unreasonable to provide students with support and opportunities to read such texts on their own, primarily silently. Additionally, as adults we are occasionally called on to closely read material that we might consider difficult or challenging—for example, technical texts related to our profession or courses we may be taking, or even texts we read for our own pleasure and entertainment purposes that may be more challenging in nature. Certainly, giving students similar opportunities to read challenging material—with appropriate support—needs to be part of our reading instruction. Therefore, we may safely conclude that issues of silent reading fluency, stamina, and close reading of complex texts are foundational for proficiency in reading and success in various academic and technical fields. These issues are challenging for literacy scholars and educators alike. Each element is critical in its own right. Additionally, these elements interact with one another and other critical variables in the reading process. Despite their importance, however, silent reading, stamina, and complex texts are issues that, until recently, have not received sufficient scholarly attention. That is what this book is about. Dr. Elfrieda Hiebert is one of the few literacy scholars who has extensively studied issues of silent reading, stamina, and text complexity, and in this volume, she has assembled a collection of original and previously published papers that explore these vital issues in depth. This volume offers readers the opportunity to explore the conceptual nature of these issues and discover how exactly we may begin to go about providing students with the relevant instruction that will help them achieve success in these areas. The first four chapters explore just what stamina and silent reading mean. The notion of text complexity is embedded within these chapters, as readers must engage in silent reading with stamina in order to negotiate such texts successfully and efficiently. Here we are confronted with the reality of what happens in school-based reading instruction. To develop proficiency in reading, students need to practice reading. As Hiebert stresses in her opening chapter, many students simply do not spend enough time reading in school. Increasing the amount that students read silently in schools is one of the solutions explored in the second half of the volume. Other ways that students can be supported in developing silent reading stamina are explored in the final four chapters. These applications range from a computer-based instructional protocol iv Forward that requires minimal teacher input to an approach that relies on the teacher to provide scaffolding and support for silent reading. These chapters may provide foundational principles that educators and scholars can use in order to develop their own approaches to instruction that develop students’ silent reading stamina. Success in real world reading is not measured by how fast a person can orally read a short text. Rather, reading success is more likely to be an outcome of how well a person can engage in meaningful, close, silent readings of lengthy, complex, and challenging material for extended periods of time. This volume is a significant step in moving the literacy field, scholars, curriculum developers, and practitioners toward a deeper consideration and understanding of these critical issues. Rasinski v References Deno, S.L. (1985). Curriculum-based children to read: An evidence-based measurement: The emerging alternative. assessment of the scientific research Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219–232. literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication National Institute of Child Health and No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Human Development. (2000). Report of Government Printing Office. the National Reading Panel. Teaching vi Forward Preface Teaching Stamina and Silent Reading in the Digital-Global Age Elfrieda H. Hiebert TextProject & University of California, Santa Cruz he 21st century demands that individuals have a high level of literacy to successfully participate in the tasks of colleges, communities, and jobs. Nonetheless, many students in the United TStates are not attaining the necessary levels of literacy, according to the National Assessment of Educational Progress (National Center for Education Statistics, 2013). The assessment shows that approximately two-thirds of a grade cohort fail to attain the proficient level. Such poor performances are often traced to a lack of word recognition skills, and solutions have been designated to ameliorate this perceived gap (see California Board of Education, 2014). But evidence is strong that all but a small percentage of American students—approximately 2% of a grade
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Reading Inventory Technical Guide
    Technical Guide Using a Valid and Reliable Assessment of College and Career Readiness Across Grades K–12 Technical Guide Excepting those parts intended for classroom use, no part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher. For information regarding permission, write to Scholastic Inc., 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Scholastic Inc. grants teachers who have purchased SRI College & Career permission to reproduce from this book those pages intended for use in their classrooms. Notice of copyright must appear on all copies of copyrighted materials. Portions previously published in: Scholastic Reading Inventory Target Success With the Lexile Framework for Reading, copyright © 2005, 2003, 1999; Scholastic Reading Inventory Using the Lexile Framework, Technical Manual Forms A and B, copyright © 1999; Scholastic Reading Inventory Technical Guide, copyright © 2007, 2001, 1999; Lexiles: A System for Measuring Reader Ability and Text Difficulty, A Guide for Educators, copyright © 2008; iRead Screener Technical Guide by Richard K. Wagner, copyright © 2014; Scholastic Inc. Copyright © 2014, 2008, 2007, 1999 by Scholastic Inc. All rights reserved. Published by Scholastic Inc. ISBN-13: 978-0-545-79638-5 ISBN-10: 0-545-79638-5 SCHOLASTIC, READ 180, SCHOLASTIC READING COUNTS!, and associated logos are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Scholastic Inc. LEXILE and LEXILE FRAMEWORK are registered trademarks of MetaMetrics, Inc. Other company names, brand names, and product names are the property and/or trademarks of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Reading Proficiency at the Secondary Level
    BUILDING INTRODUCTION READING PROFICIENCY AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL A Guide to Resources Cynthia L. Peterson, Ph.D. David C. Caverly, Ph.D. Sheila A. Nicholson, M.S.Ed. Sharon O’Neal, Ph.D. Susen Cusenbary, M.Ed. Southwest Texas State University Southwest Educational Development Laboratory 211 East 7th Street Austin, TX 78701 ©Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, 2000. This guide is produced in whole or in part with funds from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, under contract #RJ96006801. The con- tent herein does not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Education, any other agency of the U.S. Govern- ment or any other source. You are welcome to reproduce Building Reading Proficiency at the Secondary Level and may distribute copies at no cost to recipients; please credit the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory as publisher. SEDL is an Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer and is committed to affording equal employment opportunities to all individuals in all employ- ment matters. Available in alternative formats. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iv INTRODUCTION 1 • How to Use the Guide 2 • How Resources Were Selected 3 PART I: PERSPECTIVES 6 • Struggling Secondary Readers: A Closer Look 6 • Informal Assessment 7 • Building Reading Proficiency at the Secondary Level 9 • Principles of Effective Reading Instruction 17 • Principles of Effective Professional Development 19 PART II: RESOURCES 22 • Five Questions Organize the Programs and Strategies 22 • Programs 23 • Strategies 23 • Definitions of Terms 70 PART III: PROCEDURES FOR COMPILING THE GUIDE 133 BIBLIOGRAPHY 136 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS his project was sponsored by South- • Dr. Shernaz García, The University of west Educational Development Lab- Texas at Austin oratory and prepared by a team of • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • FAR Interpretive Report Sample
    Interpretive Report by Steven G. Feifer, DEd, Rebecca Gerhardstein Nader, PhD, and PAR Staff Client Information Client name: Sample Client Client ID : LD Test date : 05/12/2017 Date of birth : 11/10/2009 Age : 7:6 Grade/Education: 2nd Gender : Female Examiner : Dr Williams This report is intended for use by qualified professionals only and is not to be shared with the student or any other unqualified persons. Sample Client Page 1 Interpretive Report 05/12/2017 Overview of This Report The Feifer Assessment of Reading (FAR) is an individually administered measure of reading ability normed for students in prekindergarten through college. The FAR contains individual tests of reading skills which are combined to form a Phonological Index (PI), a Fluency Index (FI), and a Comprehension Index (CI). The subtests which compose the PI assess phonological processing and decoding skills of words in isolation as well as in context. The FI is comprised of subtests that assess visual perception and orthographic processing of letters and words, as well as fluidity in pronouncing phonologically-irregular words. The CI contains subtests designed to assess the underlying factors involved in deriving meaning from print. The Mixed Index (MI), calculated by combining the PI and the FI, assesses for deficits in both phonological processing and orthographic processing skills. The FAR Total Index (TI), calculated by combining the PI, FI, and CI subtests, provides the most comprehensive and reliable assessment of overall reading proficiency. Each index score is expressed as a grade-corrected standard score scaled to a mean of 100 and a standard deviation of 15.
    [Show full text]
  • Subvocalization – Toward Hearing the Inner Thoughts of Developers
    2011 19th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension Subvocalization – Toward Hearing the Inner Thoughts of Developers Chris Parnin College of Computing Georgia Institute of Technology Atlanta, Georgia USA [email protected] Abstract—Some of the most fascinating feats of cognition any significant effects hoping to be found when evaluating are never witnessed or heard by others, yet they occur daily a new tool. With instrumentation data, experimenters have in the minds of software developers practicing their craft. recorded actions, but little context and must substitute cog- Researchers have desperately tried to glimpse inside, but with limited tools, the view into a developer’s internal mental pro- nitive measures such as cognitive effort or memory retention cesses has been dim. One available tool, so far overlooked but with metrics such as ratio of document navigations to edits widely used, has demonstrated the ability to measure the phys- or frequency of revisiting a method. Talk-aloud protocols, iological correlates of cognition. When people perform complex like surveys, rely on self-reporting and require considerable tasks, sub-vocal utterances (electrical signals sent to the tongue, manual transcription and analysis that garner valuable but lips, or vocal cords) can be detected. This phenomenon has long intrigued researchers, some likening sub-vocal signals to indefinite and inconsistent insight. the conduits of our thoughts. Recently, researchers have even Within the past few decades, modern research disci- been able to decode these signals into words. In this paper, plines, such as psychology and cognitive neuroscience, have we explore the feasibility of using this approach and report collectively embraced methods that measure physiological our early results and experiences in recording electromyogram correlates of cognition as a standard practice.
    [Show full text]
  • Exploring the Contemporary Educational Challenges and Impact of Influential Coaching Classes of English Language Learning in Pakistan
    Orient Research Journal of Social Sciences ISSN Print 2616-7085 June 2019, Vol.4, No.1 [31-44] ISSN Online 2616-7093 Exploring the Contemporary Educational Challenges and Impact of Influential Coaching Classes of English Language Learning in Pakistan Hassan Bin Zubair1 Ishtiaq Ahmad2 Dr. Iftikhar Haider Malik3 Abstract This research explores the structure, phenomenon and impact of coaching class on the academic scenario in connection with the shadow education system in Pakistan. It is assumed that coaching centers focus to apply better techniques to teach English as a second language (L2). This research analyzes all the positive and negative aspects of coaching classes on English language learning especially in secondary education. This study is qualitative in its nature and mode of presentation but most of the data has been collected in written and recorded form for more comprehensive results and findings. Data is collected through questionnaires and class observation in Pakistani public sector schools. It is observed that students are satisfied with the coaching centers and the education they are providing in the sense of learning of English as a second language. Findings of this research show that students and teachers pay more attention in coaching classes/centers than to their regular classes at school. The study has some important implications, Pakistan government should introduce the tight check and balance system to reduce the burden on the parents who pay hefty amount of fees to the coaching centers for the prosperous future of their children and the standards of the public sector schools should be raised so that the students will rely more on their regular classes at school.
    [Show full text]
  • Tutoring Center Effectiveness
    Erik Cooper Tutoring Center Effectiveness: The Effect of Drop-In Tutoring While tutoring as a whole has been demonstrated to improve student learning across a variety of subjects and age groups, there is little published evidence for the effectiveness of drop-in tutoring at the undergraduate level. This type of tutoring can be derided as homework help; however, it is clear from this study that students who made use of the Tutoring Center (TC) regularly gained more academically than simply help with an individual class. In fact students who visited the TC more than 10 times per quarter had ap- proximately 10% higher rates of persistence and approximately 0.2 points higher average GPA’s than students who infrequently visited or who do not visit the TC during their first year of college. hen reviewing the literature on academic support styles, thereW is considerable evidence for the effec- tiveness of traditional one-on-one tutoring where a single tutor meets regularly with a single student to improve the learning and understand- ing of the student (Cohen & Kulik, 1981; Hartman, 1990; Topping, 1996). However, many colleges and universities choose not to or cannot afford to make individual tutoring available to their students. Instead, tutoring centers or learning labs at many institutions provide tutoring support to a number of students simultaneously. While it is assumed that students receive the same or similar benefit from tutoring in a center as they would from individual tutoring, “there is a lack of conclusive evidence to provide the rationale for the widespread implementation of effective peer tutoring programs in college settings” (Lildren & Meier, 1991, p.69).
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Special Education Students with System 44™
    Foundation Paper Supporting Special Education Students with System 44™ System 44 is a foundational reading program designed for the most challenged struggling readers in Grades 3-12. Intentionally metacognitive, System 44 helps students understand that the English language is a finite system of 44 sounds and 26 letters that can be mastered. System 44 was designed for students in Grades 3-12 reading at a BR-400 Lexile ® level, including Special Education students and English-Language learners. OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM 44 PROGRAM System 44 is designed so that the teacher, technology, and texts work together to deliver highly engaging, comprehensive, research-based instructional content to the older struggling reader. Through a combination of teacher-led and software-based instruction, the System 44 student is guided along a systematic path from phonemic awareness to fluent reading. System 44 includes research-based features designed for the most challenged older readers: Computer-Based Screening and Placement The Scholastic Phonics Inventory (SPI) collects data on students’ decoding accuracy as well as fluency. This helps to identify students whose lack of decoding proficiency impedes comprehension. The SPI uses real, as well as nonsense words, which assess students’ ability to apply decoding skills to unfamiliar words. Adaptive Software The System 44 adaptive software delivers, direct, systematic, research-based phonics instruction to students. Multiple points of entry allow students to work at the appropriate level based on their performance on the SPI. Independent Reading Beginning readers will always have something to read with the System 44 program. The Decodable Digest includes two passages for every sound-spelling correspondence taught in the program.
    [Show full text]
  • Research Paper
    Research-Based Vocabulary WORDLY WISE 3000® 3rd Edition Books K–12 Kenneth Hodkinson and Sandra Adams (Books 2–12), Cheryl Dressler (Books K–1) By Lee Mountain For young children, one of the most effective ways to learn new words is to listen to read- alouds. Older children, on the other hand, learn many new words through independent reading. Whether children are pre-readers or already reading independently, there is a growing consensus among educators regarding the need for direct teaching of academic vocabulary in a systematic program. In fact, recent research has shown not only that it is important, but that it is important much earlier than was previously thought. This is especially true for children who come from disadvantaged backgrounds, many of whom enter school knowing far fewer words than their middle class peers. The words in the Wordly Wise 3000® series will expand the vocabularies and minds of today’s students. The Third Edition, which extends from kindergarten through high school, Wordly Wise 3000® is a kindergarten provides teachers with effective research-based lessons for direct instruction in vocabulary. through grade 12 vocabulary series that includes reproducible tests and Today’s educators are becoming increasingly aware of the benefits of a structured vocabulary curriculum. Thomas Gunning, author of Creating Literacy Instruction for All an online test generator. The entire Children, calls a planned program of vocabulary development “highly advisable,” and he program introduces over 3,000 suggests that a certain amount of time be set aside each week for vocabulary instruction: words, and exercises become more “A planned approach ensures that vocabulary instruction is given the attention it deserves.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Teaching Phonics and Phonemic Awareness Training To
    The Effect of Teaching Phonics and Phonemic Awareness Training to Adolescent Struggling Readers by Stephanie Hardesty Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education December 2013 Goucher College Graduate Programs in Education Table of Contents List of Tables i Abstract ii I. Introduction 1 Statement of the Problem 2 Hypothesis 3 Operational Definitions 3 II. Literature Review 6 Phonemic Awareness Training and Phonics 6 Reading Instruction in the High School Setting 7 Reading Remediation 10 Summary 13 III. Methods 14 Participants 14 Instrument 15 Procedure 16 IV. Results 19 V. Discussion 20 Implications 20 Threats to Validity 21 Comparison to Previous Studies 22 Suggestions for Future Research 24 References 25 List of Tables 1. Pre- and Post-SRI Test Results 19 i Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of teaching phonics and phonemic awareness training to adolescent struggling readers. The measurement tool was the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI). This study involved the use of a pretest/posttest design to compare data prior to the implementation of the reading intervention, System 44, to data after the intervention was complete (one to two years). Achievement gains were not significant, though results could be attributable to a number of intervening factors. Research in the area of high school reading remediation should continue given the continued disagreement over best practices and the new standards that must be met per the Common Core. ii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Advanced or proficient reading abilities are one of the primary yet essential skills that should be mastered by every student.
    [Show full text]
  • Research and the Reading Wars James S
    CHAPTER 4 Research and the Reading Wars James S. Kim Controversy over the role of phonics in reading instruction has persisted for over 100 years, making the reading wars seem like an inevitable fact of American history. In the mid-nineteenth century, Horace Mann, the secre- tary of the Massachusetts Board of Education, railed against the teaching of the alphabetic code—the idea that letters represented sounds—as an imped- iment to reading for meaning. Mann excoriated the letters of the alphabet as “bloodless, ghostly apparitions,” and argued that children should first learn to read whole words) The 1886 publication of James Cattell’s pioneer- ing eye movement study showed that adults perceived words more rapidly 2 than letters, providing an ostensibly scientific basis for Mann’s assertions. In the twentieth century, state education officials like Mann have contin- ued to voice strong opinions about reading policy and practice, aiding the rapid implementation of whole language—inspired curriculum frameworks and texts during the late 1980s. And scientists like Cattell have shed light on theprocesses underlying skillful reading, contributing to a growing scientific 3 consensus that culminated in the 2000 National Reading Panel report. This chapter traces the history of the reading wars in both the political arena and the scientific community. The narrative is organized into three sections. The first offers the history of reading research in the 1950s, when the “conventional wisdom” in reading was established by acclaimed lead- ers in the field like William Gray, who encouraged teachers to instruct chil- dren how to read whole words while avoiding isolated phonics drills.
    [Show full text]
  • Reading Fluency
    ß What is reading fluency? ß Why is fluency important? Reading ß What instruction helps students Fluency develop fluency? ß How can we adapt instruction for students with special needs? ß How can we monitor students’ progress in fluency? ©2002 UT System/TEA Effective Fluency Instruction and Progress Monitoring 1 Fluency: reading quickly, accurately, and with expression ß Combines rate and accuracy ß Requires automaticity Fluency ß Includes reading with prosody Rate + Accuracy Fluency Comprehension ©2002 UT System/TEA Effective Fluency Instruction and Progress Monitoring 2 Automaticity: ß Is quick, accurate recognition of letters and words Automaticity ß Frees cognitive resources to process meaning ß Is achieved through corrected practice ©2002 UT System/TEA Effective Fluency Instruction and Progress Monitoring 3 What does fluent reading sound like? Fluent Reading . Fluent reading flows. It sounds smooth, with natural pauses. ©2002 UT System/TEA Effective Fluency Instruction and Progress Monitoring 4 ß “Fluency provides a bridge between word recognition and comprehension.” —National Institute for Literacy (NIFL), Why Is 2001, p. 22 Reading ß Fluent readers are able to focus Fluency their attention on understanding Important? text. ß Because non-fluent readers focus much of their attention on figuring out words, they have less attention to devote to comprehension. ©2002 UT System/TEA Effective Fluency Instruction and Progress Monitoring 5 What ß How to decode words (in isolation and in Students connected text) Need to ß How to automatically
    [Show full text]
  • Developing Early Literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel I
    Developing Early Literacy REPORT OF THE NATIONAL EARLY LITERACY PANEL A Scientific Synthesis of Early Literacy Development and Implications for Intervention Developing Early Literacy REPORT OF THE NATIONAL EARLY LITERACY PANEL A Scientific Synthesis of Early Literacy Development and Implications for Intervention 2008 This publication was developed by the National Center for Family Literacy under a grant funded by Inter-agency agreement IAD-01-1701 and IAD-02-1790 between the Department of Health and Human Services and the National Institute for Literacy. It was peer reviewed and copy edited under a contract with RAND Corporation and designed under a contract with Graves Fowler Creative. The views expressed herein do not necessarily represent the policies of the National Institute for Literacy. No official endorsement by the National Institute for Literacy of any product, commodity, or enterprise in this publication is intended or should be inferred. The National Institute for Literacy, an agency in the Federal government, is authorized to help strengthen literacy across the lifespan. The Institute provides national leadership on literacy issues, including the improvement of reading instruction for children, youth, and adults by dissemination of information on scientifically based research and the application of those findings to instructional practice. Sandra Baxter, Director Lynn Reddy, Deputy Director The Partnership for Reading, a project administered by the National Institute for Literacy, is a collaborative effort of the National Institute for Literacy, the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the U.S. Department of Education, and the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services to make scientifically based reading research available to educators, parents, policy makers, and others with an interest in helping all people learn to read well.
    [Show full text]