Research Paper

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Research Paper Research-Based Vocabulary WORDLY WISE 3000® 3rd Edition Books K–12 Kenneth Hodkinson and Sandra Adams (Books 2–12), Cheryl Dressler (Books K–1) By Lee Mountain For young children, one of the most effective ways to learn new words is to listen to read- alouds. Older children, on the other hand, learn many new words through independent reading. Whether children are pre-readers or already reading independently, there is a growing consensus among educators regarding the need for direct teaching of academic vocabulary in a systematic program. In fact, recent research has shown not only that it is important, but that it is important much earlier than was previously thought. This is especially true for children who come from disadvantaged backgrounds, many of whom enter school knowing far fewer words than their middle class peers. The words in the Wordly Wise 3000® series will expand the vocabularies and minds of today’s students. The Third Edition, which extends from kindergarten through high school, Wordly Wise 3000® is a kindergarten provides teachers with effective research-based lessons for direct instruction in vocabulary. through grade 12 vocabulary series that includes reproducible tests and Today’s educators are becoming increasingly aware of the benefits of a structured vocabulary curriculum. Thomas Gunning, author of Creating Literacy Instruction for All an online test generator. The entire Children, calls a planned program of vocabulary development “highly advisable,” and he program introduces over 3,000 suggests that a certain amount of time be set aside each week for vocabulary instruction: words, and exercises become more “A planned approach ensures that vocabulary instruction is given the attention it deserves. challenging for upper grades. Important words and techniques for learning words are taught systematically and in depth” (2003, p. 236). Research studies have established that even though children learn many words incidentally, they also need and profit from the direct teaching of vocabulary (Curtis, 1987; Petty, Herold, & Stoll, 1968). “It is important that teachers provide explicit and direct vocabulary instruction for all students” (Vacca et al., 2003, p. 308). Andrew Biemiller, of the Institute of Child Study in Toronto, recommends an increased emphasis on vocabulary instruction. With respect to the earliest grades, K and 1, Biemiller maintains that an exclusive emphasis on decoding without concurrent instruction in challenging vocabulary results in reading comprehension difficulties in the middle elementary years. For all students, Biemiller suggests “a teacher-centered and curriculum- structured approach to ensure adequate vocabulary development” (2001, p. 24). Wordly Wise 3000 embodies this approach. The Gap in Vocabulary Instruction The well-documented research of Hart and Risley (1995, 2003) points to a significant vocabulary gap among various groups of children by the age of three. This gap reflects how much parents talk to their children, with children of professional families having a working vocabulary of 1,116 words, those from working class families, 749 words, and those from lower socio-economic level families, just 525 words. Although the need to remedy this early gap has been apparent for many years, a series of recent studies finds that the gap is not being adequately filled. “The findings suggest many districts could be performance on state and national assessments. at a disadvantage in meeting the increased The Wordly Wise 3000 series was designed to requirements for vocabulary learning from the include a large percentage of words drawn from Common Core State Standards (CCSS), said a variety of standardized tests in order to help study co-author Susan B. Neuman, a professor in students succeed. educational studies specializing in early-literacy development at the University of Michigan in Ann The standards movement—especially the Arbor. Common Core State Standards—has raised the bar for all students, making vocabulary ‘Vocabulary is the tip of the iceberg: Words instruction essential, beginning as early as reflect concepts and content that students need kindergarten. Expectations are higher, and the “We have to stop thinking of to know,’ Ms. Neuman said. ‘This whole common curriculum is more challenging (Wixson & Dutro, vocabulary as a supplemental core will fall on its face if kids are not getting the 1998; Editorial Projects in Education, 2001). activity. We must put it where kind of instruction it will require’ (2013). The need is greater, therefore, for vocabulary it belongs, at the very core of the instruction for the many students who are curriculum.” In the past, vocabulary was often addressed struggling to pass the high-stakes tests based indirectly through a core reading, language arts, on the new standards. Wordly Wise 3000, Third or spelling program. Moreover, researchers in Edition, has been correlated with the Common the last century, such as Thorndike (1921, 1944), Core State Standards. Rinsland (1945), Fry (1957), and Dale & O’Rourke (1981), developed word lists and teachers’ word The research of the late Jeanne Chall and her books, suggesting which words to teach within colleagues showed a pressing need for direct these programs. Even today, word-frequency vocabulary instruction for many children. Those research is a building block of textbook programs researchers pointed out that, even after strong (Steinmetz, 1999; Harris & Jacobson, 1982). phonics instruction, children who are not exposed to broad vocabulary outside school No longer, however, can vocabulary instruction declined in reading comprehension between be treated as merely a subsection of reading, grades 3 and 7 because of their vocabulary language arts, and spelling programs. The limitations—the limits of their language (Chall, National Reading Panel (National Institute of Jacobs, & Baldwin, 1990). But research has also Child Health and Human Development, 2000) shown that those limits can be extended: Stahl identified five pillars as the basis for reading and Fairbanks (1986) established that direct instruction: phonological awareness, phonics, vocabulary instruction can significantly improve fluency, comprehension, and vocabulary. Among comprehension. In fact, vocabulary knowledge these topics, vocabulary is unique. The other is the most important factor in reading topics involve learning a finite number of skills comprehension (LaFlamme, 1997). or suggest a finite amount of practice. Only vocabulary acquisition is ongoing throughout life Better comprehension is one of the primary (Stahl, 2004). “Word knowledge is not known or benefits of the vocabulary curriculum of Wordly unknown as a letter name is; rather, knowledge Wise 3000. But the other benefits extend into about words and one’s ability to use vocabulary all areas of oral and written communication. is acquired incrementally (Dougherty Stahl, 2011). Vocabulary is also an avenue to better writing (Tompkins, 2003). Students are led to use the Vocabulary knowledge is essential for success on featured words from their Wordly Wise 3000 all of today’s high-stakes tests. Even if teachers lessons in their writing, as well as to comprehend do not emphasize word study for its own sake, them in reading. they are held accountable for their students’ 2 EPS LITERACY AND INTERVENTION According to Kenneth Hodkinson, the author Many of the words chosen are more of Wordly Wise 3000, Books 2 through 12, sophisticated words for known concepts, such “We have to stop thinking of vocabulary as a as release (let go), leap (jump), and delighted supplemental activity. We must put it where (happy). Other words, such as nation, decay, it belongs, at the very core of the curriculum” and reflect, name important new concepts. (2002, p. 4). In addition, because “A person with a larger vocabulary not only knows more words, but Choosing Words and Designing also knows more meanings for many words” Instruction and Activities for (Qian, 1999; Vermeer, 2001, as cited in Stahl & Wordly Wise 3000 Nagy, p. 13), Wordly Wise 3000 Books K and 1 introduce children to the notion of multiple Active participation in... Books K and 1 meanings. Thus, multiple meanings of familiar words such as row, ring, patch, trunk, and store discussions promotes the As noted above, children enter kindergarten with a are systematically taught. learning of vocabulary. wide range of vocabulary knowledge (Hart & Risley, 1995). For children who enter school with smaller Books 2 through 12 vocabularies, Wordly Wise 3000 Books K and 1 ensure exposure to a core of high-utility vocabulary When Kenneth Hodkinson speaks to teachers used frequently across domains. For children with around the country about his Wordly Wise 3000 larger vocabularies, more challenging words are series, he frequently gets inquiries about how he taught through a supplementary Extend and chose the words and what he considers important Challenge activity. In all cases, children learn words in vocabulary exercises. His answers show both his that are both developmentally appropriate and research orientation and his creativity. important for content-area reading comprehension Hodkinson’s starting point was the research by in later grades. Harris and Jacobson (1982) on word frequency in school readers and the grade level of a Cheryl Dressler has chosen the words for Wordly word’s first appearance. For example, consider Wise 3000 Books K and 1 in consultation Hodkinson’s reasoning regarding the words with two major references: The Living Word enormous
Recommended publications
  • Reading Inventory Technical Guide
    Technical Guide Using a Valid and Reliable Assessment of College and Career Readiness Across Grades K–12 Technical Guide Excepting those parts intended for classroom use, no part of this publication may be reproduced in whole or in part, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without written permission of the publisher. For information regarding permission, write to Scholastic Inc., 557 Broadway, New York, NY 10012. Scholastic Inc. grants teachers who have purchased SRI College & Career permission to reproduce from this book those pages intended for use in their classrooms. Notice of copyright must appear on all copies of copyrighted materials. Portions previously published in: Scholastic Reading Inventory Target Success With the Lexile Framework for Reading, copyright © 2005, 2003, 1999; Scholastic Reading Inventory Using the Lexile Framework, Technical Manual Forms A and B, copyright © 1999; Scholastic Reading Inventory Technical Guide, copyright © 2007, 2001, 1999; Lexiles: A System for Measuring Reader Ability and Text Difficulty, A Guide for Educators, copyright © 2008; iRead Screener Technical Guide by Richard K. Wagner, copyright © 2014; Scholastic Inc. Copyright © 2014, 2008, 2007, 1999 by Scholastic Inc. All rights reserved. Published by Scholastic Inc. ISBN-13: 978-0-545-79638-5 ISBN-10: 0-545-79638-5 SCHOLASTIC, READ 180, SCHOLASTIC READING COUNTS!, and associated logos are trademarks and/or registered trademarks of Scholastic Inc. LEXILE and LEXILE FRAMEWORK are registered trademarks of MetaMetrics, Inc. Other company names, brand names, and product names are the property and/or trademarks of their respective owners.
    [Show full text]
  • Building Reading Proficiency at the Secondary Level
    BUILDING INTRODUCTION READING PROFICIENCY AT THE SECONDARY LEVEL A Guide to Resources Cynthia L. Peterson, Ph.D. David C. Caverly, Ph.D. Sheila A. Nicholson, M.S.Ed. Sharon O’Neal, Ph.D. Susen Cusenbary, M.Ed. Southwest Texas State University Southwest Educational Development Laboratory 211 East 7th Street Austin, TX 78701 ©Southwest Educational Development Laboratory, 2000. This guide is produced in whole or in part with funds from the Office of Educational Research and Improvement, U.S. Department of Education, under contract #RJ96006801. The con- tent herein does not necessarily reflect the views of the Department of Education, any other agency of the U.S. Govern- ment or any other source. You are welcome to reproduce Building Reading Proficiency at the Secondary Level and may distribute copies at no cost to recipients; please credit the Southwest Educational Development Laboratory as publisher. SEDL is an Equal Opportunity/ Affirmative Action Employer and is committed to affording equal employment opportunities to all individuals in all employ- ment matters. Available in alternative formats. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION ACKNOWLEDGMENTS iv INTRODUCTION 1 • How to Use the Guide 2 • How Resources Were Selected 3 PART I: PERSPECTIVES 6 • Struggling Secondary Readers: A Closer Look 6 • Informal Assessment 7 • Building Reading Proficiency at the Secondary Level 9 • Principles of Effective Reading Instruction 17 • Principles of Effective Professional Development 19 PART II: RESOURCES 22 • Five Questions Organize the Programs and Strategies 22 • Programs 23 • Strategies 23 • Definitions of Terms 70 PART III: PROCEDURES FOR COMPILING THE GUIDE 133 BIBLIOGRAPHY 136 ACKNOWLEDGMENTS his project was sponsored by South- • Dr. Shernaz García, The University of west Educational Development Lab- Texas at Austin oratory and prepared by a team of • Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Supporting Special Education Students with System 44™
    Foundation Paper Supporting Special Education Students with System 44™ System 44 is a foundational reading program designed for the most challenged struggling readers in Grades 3-12. Intentionally metacognitive, System 44 helps students understand that the English language is a finite system of 44 sounds and 26 letters that can be mastered. System 44 was designed for students in Grades 3-12 reading at a BR-400 Lexile ® level, including Special Education students and English-Language learners. OVERVIEW OF THE SYSTEM 44 PROGRAM System 44 is designed so that the teacher, technology, and texts work together to deliver highly engaging, comprehensive, research-based instructional content to the older struggling reader. Through a combination of teacher-led and software-based instruction, the System 44 student is guided along a systematic path from phonemic awareness to fluent reading. System 44 includes research-based features designed for the most challenged older readers: Computer-Based Screening and Placement The Scholastic Phonics Inventory (SPI) collects data on students’ decoding accuracy as well as fluency. This helps to identify students whose lack of decoding proficiency impedes comprehension. The SPI uses real, as well as nonsense words, which assess students’ ability to apply decoding skills to unfamiliar words. Adaptive Software The System 44 adaptive software delivers, direct, systematic, research-based phonics instruction to students. Multiple points of entry allow students to work at the appropriate level based on their performance on the SPI. Independent Reading Beginning readers will always have something to read with the System 44 program. The Decodable Digest includes two passages for every sound-spelling correspondence taught in the program.
    [Show full text]
  • The Effect of Teaching Phonics and Phonemic Awareness Training To
    The Effect of Teaching Phonics and Phonemic Awareness Training to Adolescent Struggling Readers by Stephanie Hardesty Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Master of Education December 2013 Goucher College Graduate Programs in Education Table of Contents List of Tables i Abstract ii I. Introduction 1 Statement of the Problem 2 Hypothesis 3 Operational Definitions 3 II. Literature Review 6 Phonemic Awareness Training and Phonics 6 Reading Instruction in the High School Setting 7 Reading Remediation 10 Summary 13 III. Methods 14 Participants 14 Instrument 15 Procedure 16 IV. Results 19 V. Discussion 20 Implications 20 Threats to Validity 21 Comparison to Previous Studies 22 Suggestions for Future Research 24 References 25 List of Tables 1. Pre- and Post-SRI Test Results 19 i Abstract The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of teaching phonics and phonemic awareness training to adolescent struggling readers. The measurement tool was the Scholastic Reading Inventory (SRI). This study involved the use of a pretest/posttest design to compare data prior to the implementation of the reading intervention, System 44, to data after the intervention was complete (one to two years). Achievement gains were not significant, though results could be attributable to a number of intervening factors. Research in the area of high school reading remediation should continue given the continued disagreement over best practices and the new standards that must be met per the Common Core. ii CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION Advanced or proficient reading abilities are one of the primary yet essential skills that should be mastered by every student.
    [Show full text]
  • COMEDY CENTRAL Records Releases Ryan Stout's "Touche" Debut Digital Album on December 6
    COMEDY CENTRAL Records Releases Ryan Stout's "Touche" Debut Digital Album on December 6 NEW YORK, Nov. 21, 2011 /PRNewswire/ -- Ryan Stout tends to say the wrong thing – in exactly the right way. Or, maybe, it's the right thing in the wrong way! In any case, COMEDY CENTRAL Records releases Ryan Stout's debut digital album, "Touche" on Tuesday, December 6. Recorded live at Acme Comedy Company in Minneapolis, MN, "Touche" is packed with complex twists, unexpected turns, and sharp punch lines. Exploring morally repugnant subject matter with smart and sterile objectivity, Stout's delightful insincerity and self-righteousness make this digital album both witty and wicked. To assure his brand of "offensive humor" stays on an intellectual level, he generally keeps profanity out of his act, even while touching on such subjects as sexual assault and abortion in his own clever manner. Ryan Stout has toured the globe with his extremely well-crafted stand-up for more than ten years. When he was only 22 years old, he won first place in the Boston International Comedy Festival's Stand-up Comedy Competition. Many opportunities soon followed, including performances at "The Comedy Festival" in Las Vegas, at HBO's "U.S. Comedy Arts Festival" in Aspen, and at the prestigious "Just for Laughs" International Comedy Festival in Montreal. In the world of television, Stout has hosted various series and specials for MTV, including the iconic "MTV's Spring Break." He has appeared as a regular guest on "Chelsea Lately," made his late-night stand-up debut on "Conan,"
    [Show full text]
  • Bo Burnham Cd Zip
    Bo burnham cd zip click here to download Bo Burnham: Album: YouTube Songs: Genre: Comedy. The ImageCo Portfolio; 7 bo burnham words words words album zip bo burnham words words words. Request file Help How to download bo burnham word words words file to my device? 1. Click it and That's it, you're done amigo! bo burnham album rar zip. Bo Burnham Album Rar Zip >> www.doorway.ru e92b22f www.doorway.ru Or, You Cant Survive on Ideas Alone by Bo Burnham Zip. 30 MiB. Bo Burnham What Audio CD Nov 26, N-e-r-d avi. Avi gif. Hey Reddit, Really liked Bo Burnham's latest performance, loved track name, album name, genre) that mostly only includes the song bits. English. limit my search to r/boburnham Content must be related/relevant to Bo Burnham Do you have a zip version with individual tracks? All Bo Burnham. All the time. RULES. Content must be related/relevant to Bo Burnham. No hate speech. Any hatred and/or bigotry will be. Only putting this here as it looks like Bo will not be releasing a new album, but if he does end up releasing a Make Happy Album please please. Here you can download bo burnham album rar zip shared files: Bo Burnham I'm Bo www.doorway.ru3 www.doorway.ru Thank me later drake album rar zip www.doorway.ru ( A year later his next big hit, “I'm Bo Yo,” appeared on his self-titled album. The physical CD version included a bonus DVD of Burnham's first.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lexile Framework: Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful
    The Lexile Framework: Unnecessary and Potentially Harmful Stephen Krashen CSLA (California School Library Association) Journal 24(2): 25-26, 2001 The Lexile Framework attempts to solve a problem that doesn't exist. It is a readability formula that "stands firmly in the tradition of classic readability formulas" (Stenner, 1996, p. 23) that assigns reading levels to texts based on word frequency and sentence length. The Lexile Framework is intended to help teachers and librarians recommend supplementary reading that is at the right reading level: "For example, an eighth-grade girl who is interested in sports but is not reading at grade level might be able to handle a biography of a famous athlete. The teacher may not know, however, whether that biography is too difficult or too easy for the student. " All the teacher has to do is use the Lexile Framework on the text and the student and select a book at the right level. Then, "as the reader improves, new titles with higher text measures can be chosen to match the growing person (sic) measure, thus keeping the comprehension rate at the chosen level." (Stenner, 1996, p. 22). Not Necessary None of this is necessary, and it is probably harmful. There is a much easier way for readers to select texts: Are they comprehensible and interesting? It doesn't take long for a reader to determine this: All it takes is sampling a little of the text (reading it). Our eighth grader simply needs to have a look at a few biographies. Teachers and librarians can certainly help in text selection and they do this all the time, with great success.
    [Show full text]
  • Ela Best Standards
    Table of Contents Table of Contents .......................................................................................................................................... 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................................... 5 Standards Map ............................................................................................................................................ 10 Progression of Foundations Benchmarks .................................................................................................... 11 Spiraled Standards in a Vertical Progression .............................................................................................. 13 Kindergarten ........................................................................................................................................... 26 Foundational Skills ............................................................................................................................. 26 Reading ............................................................................................................................................... 27 Communication ................................................................................................................................... 29 Vocabulary .......................................................................................................................................... 32 Sample texts by
    [Show full text]
  • The Research Foundation for Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA)
    The Research Foundation for Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) The Core Knowledge Foundation Revised September, 2016 Anita S. McGinty, CCC-SLP, Ph.D ASEC Advisory, Founder Linda Bevilacqua Core Knowledge Foundation, President Executive Summary Core Knowledge Language Arts (CKLA) Program: Links to Research on Learning and Teaching The Common Core State Standards (CCSS) establish an ambitious vision for the K–12 education system. The standards demand that educational experiences, at every point along the developmental continuum, transparently and intentionally point children toward becoming “college and career ready.” Embedded within the language arts standards is a shift in how to approach reading and writing as developmental processes. The standards move away from reading and writing as discrete skills and toward reading and writing as language-based, lifelong developments that are tightly interwoven with children’s growing knowledge. Indeed, language arts in the context of the CCSS puts knowledge first, with a call for curricula that is “intentionally and coherently structured to develop rich content knowledge within and across grades (NGA Center for Best Practices and CCSS, 2010, p. 10, as quoted in Cervetti & Hiebert, 2015). A major shift within the CCSS is the emphasis on “developing knowledge for and through reading” (Cervetti & Hiebert, 2015). This makes the content of texts as important as other more traditional factors considered within the ELA blocks of young children, such as text levels or decodability. Although the CCSS establish a common focus on the integration of language arts instruction and knowledge building, common standards are not a guarantee that each effort at implementation will be equally effective.
    [Show full text]
  • T E CH N IC AL M an U AL— G R AD E S 3–12 9V.5.0
    TECHNICAL MANUAL—GRADES 3–12 REV. JULY. 24, 2019v.5.0 for READING ASSESSMENT PRESCRIPTIVE INSTRUCTIONAL DATA INSTRUCTIONAL PRESCRIPTIVE LEXIA® RAPIDTM ASSESSMENT Technical Manual for RAPID Version 5.0: Grades 3-12 © 2019 Lexia Learning, a Rosetta Stone Company. Lexia®, RAPID™, and other trademarks, names, and logos used herein are the property of Rosetta Stone Ltd. and/or its subsidiaries, and are registered and/or used in the United States and other countries. METAMETRICS® and LEXILE® are trademarks of MetaMetrics, Inc., and are registered in the United States and abroad. Additional trademarks included herein are the property of their respective owners. Information in this document is subject to change without notice and does not represent a commitment on the part of Lexia Learning Systems LLC. The software described in this document is furnished under a license agreement or non-disclosure agreement. The software may be used only in accordance with the terms of the agreement. It is against the law to copy the software on any medium except as specifically allowed in the license or non-disclosure agreement. No part of this manual may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and recording, for any purpose without the express written permission of Lexia Learning Systems LLC. www.lexialearning.com 300 Baker Avenue • Suite 320 • Concord, MA 01742 TECHNICAL MANUAL FOR RAPID V5.0: GRADES 3-12 tel: 800-435-3942 / 978-405-6200 fax: 978-287-0062 Contents Acknowledgments ................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Smart Language: Readers, Readability, and the Grading of Texts
    Smart Language Readers, Readability, and the Grading of Text William H. DuBay Impact Information Costa Mesa, California Copyright Smart Language: Readers, Readability, and the Grading of Text 25 January 2007 2007 William H. DuBay. All Rights Reserved. AbstraCt Smart Language gives a brief introduCtion to the adult literaCy surveys and the researCh on readaBility and the readaBility formulas. Readers' Comments Please send all Comments and suggestions regarding this doCument to: William DuBay Email: [email protected] WeBsite: http://www.impaCt-information.Com ISBN: 1-4196-5439-X To George R. Klare 1922—2006 Teacher, writer, sCientist, and friend Contents IntroduCtion ............................................................................................................... 1 Writing for the Right AudienCe ................................................................ 1 Writing for the Wrong AudienCe ............................................................. 2 What Is a Reading Grade Level? .............................................................. 4 What is ReadaBility? ................................................................................... 4 The ReadaBility Formulas ......................................................................... 6 How This Book is Organized .................................................................... 7 Part 1 How People Read ........................................................................................ 10 Chapter 1 The Adult LiteraCy Surveys ........................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Curriculum-Specific Text Readability Assessment Model for EFL Students in Korea
    LXPER Index: a curriculum-specific text readability assessment model for EFL students in Korea Bruce W. Lee1,2 Jason Hyung-Jong Lee1 1Research & Development Center 2Department of Computer & Information Science LXPER, Inc. University of Pennsylvania Seoul, South Korea Philadelphia, PA, USA Abstract—Automatic readability assessment is one of the most annually on English education in South Korea, and in Japan, it important applications of Natural Language Processing (NLP) in is much more [23]. Despite the amount of importance put in education. Since automatic readability assessment allows the fast English education in such countries, the automatic text selection of appropriate reading material for readers at all levels readability assessment method has not been in active use. This of proficiency, it can be particularly useful for the English is mostly because of the low level of accuracy of the traditional education of English as Foreign Language (EFL) students around the world. However, most readability assessment models are readability assessment formulas for use in an international EFL developed for the native readers of English and have low accu- curriculum, which we will prove later in this paper. racy for texts in non-native English Language Training (ELT) Previous work in automatic readability assessment has curriculum. We introduce LXPER Index, which is a readability assessment model for non-native EFL readers in the ELT focused on analyzing the generic features of a text. For curriculum of Korea. We also introduce the Text Corpus of the example, Flesch-Kincaid readability tests use variables like Korean ELT Curriculum (CoKEC-text), which is the first colle- total words, total sentences, and total syllables to identify the ction of English texts from a non-native country’s ELT curric- difficulty of a text [20].
    [Show full text]