Joint Programme 6.1 – Transition From

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Joint Programme 6.1 – Transition From JOINT PROGRAMME 6.1 – TRANSITION FROM HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT End-of-Programme Evaluation Final Report submitted to UNDP Tanzania by Lovemore M. Zinyama and Slaus Mwisomba July 2011 CONTENTS page ACRONYMS iii EXECUTIVE SUMMARY v 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1 1.1 Background to the Joint Programme 6.1 1 1.2 Expected Results of the Joint Programme 6.1 1 1.3 UN Delivering as One (DaO) 3 1.4 Purpose of the Evaluation 4 1.5 Structure of the Report 5 2.0 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 6 2.1 Introduction 6 2.2 Review of Documents 6 2.3 Evaluation Work Plan 6 2.4 Development of Data Collection Tools 7 2.5 Interviews with Key Informants 8 2.6 Field Visits to Activity Sites 8 2.7 Focus Group Discussions with Community Leaders and Beneficiaries 9 2.8 Limitations of the Evaluation 9 3.0 KEY OUTPUTS OF THE JOINT PROGRAMME 6.1 11 3.1 Introduction 11 3.2 Key Outputs of the Joint Programme 6.1 11 3.2.1 Education 11 3.2.2 Health 14 3.2.3 Land Use Planning 16 3.2.4 Capacity Development in the LGAs 17 3.2.5 Child Protection 18 3.2.6 Water, Sanitation and Hygiene (WASH) 18 3.2.7 Border and Migration Controls 19 3.3 Where was the JP 6.1 Less Successful? 20 4.0 PROGRAMME RELEVANCE, EFFICIENCY, IMPACTS, SUSTAINABILITY AND PARTNERSHIPS 21 4.1 Introduction 21 4.2 Relevance of the JP 6.1 21 4.3 Programme Efficiency and Effectiveness 23 4.4 Programme Outcomes/Impacts 26 4.4.1 Programme Impacts on the Quality of Health Services 26 4.4.2 Programme Impacts on the Quality of Education 27 4.4.3 Programme Impacts on WASH 28 4.4.4 Protection of Vulnerable Groups 29 4.4.5 Programme Impacts on LGA Capacity for Planning, M&E and Gender Mainstreaming 30 4.4.6 Programme Impacts on Migration Procedures and Controls 31 4.5 Sustainability of Programme Outputs and Outcomes 32 i 4.6 Partnerships and Coordination 34 4.6.1 National and Regional Level Coordination 34 4.6.2 One UN Joint Team 34 4.6.3 Cluster Working Groups 36 4.6.4 District and Regional Level Coordination 37 4.6.5 Overall Assessment of DaO under the JP 6.1 37 4.7 Cross-cutting Issues 38 5.0 CONCLUSION, LESSONS LEARNED AND RECOMMENDATIONS 42 5.1 Conclusion 42 5.2 Lessons Learned 42 5.3 Recommendations 43 5.3.1 Recommendation for the GoT 44 5.3.2 Recommendations for the UN in Tanzania 44 APPENDICES 1: Terms of Reference 46 2: Work Plan 55 3: Evaluation Matrix 58 4: Persons Interviewed 64 5. Key Outputs of the Joint Programme 6.1, by District and Cluster 67 TABLES 1: JP 6.1 objectives and key results 2 2: JP 6.1 coordination meetings of the One UN Joint Team held in Kigoma 35 TEXT BOXES 1: Who is the beneficiary? - Mkugwa Girls High School, Kibondo District 22 2: Programme relevance - Lugufu Girls Secondary School, Kigoma District 23 3: Programme efficiency – “Delivering as One” requires commitment, inter-agency communication and coordination 25 4: Programme impact - land use planning in Nyakaiga Village, Karagwe District 31 5: Sustainability of programme outputs - challenges of implementing the new primary school curriculum 33 ii ACRONYMS ACSEE Advanced Certificate of Secondary Education Examination AIDS Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome CCRO Certificate of Customary Right of Occupancy CFSVA Comprehensive Food Security and Vulnerability Analysis CHMT Council Health Management Team CVL Certificate of Village Land DaO Delivering as One DC District Commissioner DED District Executive Director DHMT District Health Management Team DRC Democratic Republic of Congo EIA Environmental Impact Assessment EPI Expanded Programme on Immunization FACE Fund Authorisation and Certification of Expenditure FAO Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations FDC Folk Development College GoT Government of Tanzania HIV Human Immuno-deficiency Virus HMIS Health Management Information System HRBA Human Rights Based Approach ILO International Labour Organisation IMCI Integrated Management of Childhood Illnesses IOM International Organisation for Migration IP Implementing Partner JP Joint Programme JSC Joint Steering Committee LED Local Economic Development LGA Local Government Authority LGRP Local Government Reform Programme MA Managing Agent M&E Monitoring and Evaluation MCH Maternal and Child Health MDA Ministry, Department, Agency MDG Millennium Development Goal MoU Memorandum of Understanding MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework MVC Most Vulnerable Children NPA Norwegian People’s Aid NSGRP National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (MKUKUTA) NWT Northwestern Tanzania OPD Outpatients Department PHC Primary Health Care PITC Provider-Initiated HIV Testing and Counselling PMTCT Prevention of Mother-to-Child Transmission of HIV PMO-RALG Prime Minister’s Office – Regional Administration & Local Government PUN Participating UN agency RAS Regional Administrative Secretary RBM Results based management iii RC Regional Commissioner RHMT Regional Health Management Team SIDO Small Industries Development Organisation TOR Terms of Reference TOT Training of Trainers TTC Teacher Training College UN United Nations UNCDF United Nations Capital Development Fund UNDAF United Nations Development Assistance Framework (2007-2010) UNDAP United Nations Development Assistance Plan (July 2011 – June 2015) UNDP United Nations Development Programme UNEP United Nations Environment Programme UNESCO United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation UNHCR United Nations High Commission for Refugees UNICEF United Nations Children’s Fund UNIDO United Nations Industrial Development Organisation VTC Vocational Training Centre WASH Water, sanitation and hygiene WFP World Food Programme WHO World Health Organisation iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Background to the Joint Programme 6.1 Northwestern Tanzania (NWT) has historically hosted refugees from Burundi, Rwanda and the DRC fleeing from internal conflicts in their countries from as early as 1972. Their number peaked during the mid-1990s when there were over 500,000 refugees in 13 camps spread across the two regions of Kigoma and Kagera. The large-scale humanitarian operation, established in response to the massive refugee influxes, has had an impact on the social and economic development of the area. As the withdrawal of humanitarian support would have considerable repercussions and consequences on the local economy of the districts that hosted the refugee camps, a joint UN programme which aimed at supporting the Regional and Local Government Authorities to address the transition from the humanitarian aid environment to sustainable development was developed during 2007-2008. It had been planned to start in July 2008, but actual implementation only started in January 2009. The Joint Programme 6.1 was implemented in the five districts of Kigoma, Kasulu, Kibondo (in Kigoma Region), Ngara and Karagwe (in Kagera Region). In addition to district- specific activities, the programme also provided capacity development support at the district and regional levels in both Kigoma and Kagera Regions. The three-year programme ended on 30 June 2011. The JP 6.1 was organised around three thematic clusters which were aligned to the Government of Tanzania (GoT)’s development goals as defined in its National Strategy for Growth and Reduction of Poverty (MKUKUTA, the KiSwahili acronym). The strategy identifies three major clusters, viz (i) growth and reduction of income poverty; (ii) improvement in the quality of life and social well-being, and (iii) good governance. An internal division of labour provided for selected Participating UN agencies (PUNs) to coordinate activities within these clusters in line with their areas of technical expertise. The selected cluster lead agency was responsible for consolidating cluster work plans, progress reports, and requests for funds, in collaboration with other PUNs and Implementing Partners (IPs) in the cluster that it was coordinating. As the three-year programme was coming to an end, UNDP, as the Managing Agent, contracted two independent external consultants to conduct an end-of-programme evaluation of the JP 6.1. 2. Purpose of the Evaluation The purpose of the evaluation was to assess the achievements (outputs and outcomes) of the Joint Programme 6.1 in Northwestern Tanzania since its commencement. More specifically, the evaluation aimed to: (i) assess the appropriateness, relevance, effectiveness, efficiency, impact and sustainability of the JP 6.1 outputs and achievements; and (ii) identify lessons learned and draw conclusions which could inform other interventions and which could contribute to decision making processes of the UN, Government of Tanzania (GoT) and other development partners. v 3. Evaluation Methodology The evaluation was conducted during the months of May and June 2011. A multi- pronged approach was used for information gathering, including Reviewing key programme documents; Development of data collection tools (evaluation matrix, interview guides and focus group discussion guides); Conducting interviews with key informants in the PUNs and the participating LGAs and MDAs, both in Dar es Salaam and in the two regions of Kigoma and Kigera; Conducting focus group discussions with community leaders and beneficiaries in the five districts; and Field visits to some of the activity sites in all five districts. 4. Key Outputs of the Joint Programme 6.1 Despite problems and delays experienced at the beginning, the programme has produced remarkable outputs that are already benefiting the communities and local authorities in the two regions. The major outputs of the programme are summarised in the following paragraphs. Outputs for Enhancing the Quality of Education: Construction of new buildings and rehabilitation of existing structures at the former refugee camps and their conversion into five new secondary schools, together with support facilities such as water, solar power, latrines, dormitories, dining rooms, kitchens and staff houses. The schools have also been provided with libraries, laboratories and science kits. Three of the schools were already operational at the time of the evaluation while the other two were expected to enrol students in time for the 2011-2012 school year.
Recommended publications
  • Appeals 11 2016 -Scale-Up-Support-To-Burundian-Refugees-In-Tanzania
    Appeal Tanzania Scale Up Emergency Response to Burundian refugee crisis in Tanzania – TZA161 Appeal Target: US$ 2,998,470 Balance Requested: US$ 2,998,470 Nairobi, November 16 2016 Dear Colleagues, Now more than a year since Burundi’s current crisis began, more than 160,000 men, women and children remain in refugee camps in Tanzania and are unable to return home. The situation inside Burundi continues to worsen. A low intensity urban conflict is spreading progressively from Bujumbura to other provinces, resulting in targeted assassinations, torture, harassments and abuses.1 Coupled with an economic collapse brought on by the conflict, this makes it virtually impossible for displaced Burundians to return home safely. Hundreds of refugees from Burundi are still entering in Tanzania every day while 140,448 Burundian refugees are currently living in Nyarugusu, Nduta and Mtendeli camps in Kigoma region. As many informants from UNHCR, INGOs and refugee leaders suggest, a quick solution to the current political crisis in Burundi and the short-term repatriation of refugees are unlikely. The current refugee situation is developing into a protracted crisis that will plausibly last for several years. The likely scenario of an extended presence in Tanzania is changing and increasing the needs of the refugees. Basic requirements need to be provided ensuring a comprehensive long term self-reliance strategy. Given the likelihood that the refugee crisis is becoming protracted, this must be done in ways that also promote social cohesion among refugees and their Tanzanian neighbours, as well as recently arrived Burundians and long-staying refugees who had fled other regional conflicts.
    [Show full text]
  • Burundian Refugees in Western Tanzania, It Can Be Expected That Such Activities Would Take Place
    BURUNDIAN REFUGEES IN TANZANIA: The Key Factor to the Burundi Peace Process ICG Central Africa Report N° 12 30 November 1999 PROLOGUE The following report was originally issued by the International Crisis Group (ICG) as an internal paper and distributed on a restricted basis in February 1999. It incorporates the results of field research conducted by an ICG analyst in and around the refugee camps of western Tanzania during the last three months of 1998. While the situation in Central Africa has evolved since the report was first issued, we believe that the main thrust of the analysis presented remains as valid today as ever. Indeed, recent events, including the killing of UN workers in Burundi and the deteriorating security situation there, only underscore the need for greater attention to be devoted to addressing the region’s unsolved refugee problem. With this in mind, we have decided to reissue the report and give it a wider circulation, in the hope that the information and arguments that follow will help raise awareness of this important problem and stimulate debate on the best way forward. International Crisis Group Nairobi 30 November 1999 Table of Contents PROLOGUE .......................................................................................................................................... I I. INTRODUCTION......................................................................................................................... 1 II. REFUGEE FLOWS INTO TANZANIA.......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Kigoma Airport
    The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment July 2008 In Association With : Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Ltd Belva Consult Limited Corinthian House, PO Box 7521, Mikocheni Area, 17 Lansdowne Road, Croydon, Rose Garden Road, Plot No 455, United Kingdom CR0 2BX, UK Dar es Salaam Tel: +44(02) 08604 8999 Tel: +255 22 2120447 Fax: +44 (02)0 8604 8877 Email: [email protected] Fax: +255 22 2120448 Web Site: www.fsnow.co.uk Email: [email protected] The United Republic of Tanzania Ministry of Infrastructure Development Tanzania Airports Authority Feasibility Study and Detailed Design for the Rehabilitation and Upgrading of Kigoma Airport Preliminary Design Report Environmental Impact Assessment Prepared by Sir Frederick Snow and Partners Limited in association with Belva Consult Limited Issue and Revision Record Rev Date Originator Checker Approver Description 0 July 08 Belva KC Preliminary Submission EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. Introduction The Government of Tanzania through the Tanzania Airports Authority is undertaking a feasibility study and detailed engineering design for the rehabilitation and upgrading of the Kigoma airport, located in Kigoma-Ujiji Municipality, Kigoma region. The project is part of a larger project being undertaken by the Tanzania Airport Authority involving rehabilitation and upgrading of high priority commercial airports across the country. The Tanzania Airport Authority has commissioned two companies M/S Sir Frederick Snow & Partners Limited of UK in association with Belva Consult Limited of Tanzania to undertake a Feasibility Study, Detail Engineering Design, Preparation of Tender Documents and Environmental and Social Impact Assessments of seven airports namely Arusha, Bukoba, Kigoma, Tabora, Mafia Island, Shinyanga and Sumbawanga.
    [Show full text]
  • Referral Transit Time Between Sending and First-Line Receiving Health Facilities: a Geographical Analysis in Tanzania
    Research BMJ Glob Health: first published as 10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001568 on 17 August 2019. Downloaded from Referral transit time between sending and first-line receiving health facilities: a geographical analysis in Tanzania Michelle M Schmitz, 1 Florina Serbanescu,1 George E Arnott,1 Michelle Dynes,1 Paul Chaote,2 Abdulaziz Ally Msuya,3 Yi No Chen1 To cite: Schmitz MM, ABSTRACT Summary box Serbanescu F, Arnott GE, Background Timely, high-quality obstetric services et al. Referral transit time are vital to reduce maternal and perinatal mortality. We What is already known? between sending and first- spatially modelled referral pathways between sending line receiving health facilities: Strengthening obstetric inter-facility referral sys- and receiving health facilities in Kigoma Region, Tanzania, ► a geographical analysis in tems in developing countries, including reducing de- identifying communication and transportation delays to Tanzania. BMJ Global Health lays due to inadequate transportation and unreliable timely care and inefficient links within the referral system. 2019;4:e001568. doi:10.1136/ communication, increases access to timely, appro- Methods We linked sending and receiving facilities to bmjgh-2019-001568 priate obstetric and neonatal care. form facility pairs, based on information from a 2016 Handling editor Seye Abimbola Health Facility Assessment. We used an AccessMod cost- What are the new findings? friction surface model, incorporating road classifications ► About 57.8% of facility pairs in Kigoma did not refer Additional material is ► and speed limits, to estimate direct travel time between to facilities providing higher levels of care. published online only. To facilities in each pair. We adjusted for transportation view please visit the journal ► When accounting for communication and transpor- online (http:// dx.
    [Show full text]
  • Report on the State of Pastoralists' Human Rights in Tanzania
    REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] Cover Picture: Maasai warriors dancing at the initiation ceremony of Mr. Kipulelia Kadege’s children in Handeni District, Tanga Region, April 2006. PAICODEO Tanzania Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark 1 REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ HUMAN RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 [Area Surveyed: Handeni, Kilindi, Bagamoyo, Kibaha, Iringa-Rural, Morogoro-Rural, Mvomero, Kilosa, Mbarali and Kiteto Districts] PARAKUIYO PASTORALISTS INDIGENOUS COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ORGANISATION-(PAICODEO) Funded By: IWGIA, Denmark i REPORT ON THE STATE OF PASTORALISTS’ RIGHTS IN TANZANIA: SURVEY OF TEN DISTRICTS OF TANZANIA MAINLAND 2010/2011 Researchers Legal and Development Consultants Limited (LEDECO Advocates) Writer Adv. Clarence KIPOBOTA (Advocate of the High Court) Publisher Parakuiyo Pastoralists Indigenous Community Development Organization © PAICODEO March, 2013 ISBN: 978-9987-9726-1-6 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ..................................................................................................... vii FOREWORD ........................................................................................................................viii Legal Status and Objectives of PAICODEO ...........................................................viii Vision ......................................................................................................................viii
    [Show full text]
  • KASULU – MANYOVU [300.1 Km] ROAD UPGRADE PROJECT
    Language: English Original: English PROJECT: MULTINATIONAL: RN3: RUMONGE – RUTUNGA - BUJUMBURA SECTION [77.6 km] AND KABINGO – KASULU – MANYOVU [300.1 km] ROAD UPGRADE PROJECT COUNTRIES: BURUNDI AND TANZANIA ESIA SUMMARY FOR THE PROPOSED UPGRADING OF NYAKANAZI – KASULU – MANYOVU ROAD (KASULU-KABINGO – KASULU ROAD SECTION AND KIBONDO BYPASS, 202 KM) TO BITUMEN STANDARD IN KASULU, KIBONDO AND KAKONKO DISTRICTS, KIGOMA REGION. Date: June 2018 Team Leader: J. NDIKUMWAMI, Senior Transport Engineer, PICU.1/COBI Co-Team Leader: J. B AGUMA, Principal Transport Economist, RDGE.4 P. KANYIMBO, Regional Integration Coordinator, RDGE0 Preparation Team E&S Team Members: P. HORUGAVYE, Environmental and Social Coordinator, RDGC/SNSC.0 E.B. KAHUBIRE, Social Development Officer, RDGE4 /SNSC 1 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. The Government of the United Republic of Tanzania with the assistance from African Development Bank (AfDB) intends to upgrade/ construct Nyakanazi – Kasulu – Manyovu road section (291km) to bitumen Standard. The project is being implemented by East Africa Community (EAC) through Tanzania Roads Agency (TANROADS). TANROADS is an Executive Agency under the Ministry of Works, Transport, and Communication; established under the Executive Agencies Act in 2000, with the duty of maintaining and developing trunk and regional road network in Tanzania Mainland. This section will of the road upgrading will constitute widening, realignment and paving of the existing Kasulu – Kabingo Road, including Kasulu and Kibondo Town Link Roads and construction of the nonexistent Kibondo bypasss Road (27.9km) by Asphalt Concrete (AC) for both carriageway and shoulders New cross drainage structures will be constructed to replace the existing structures as they are hydraulically inadequate.
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES KASULU TOWN COUNCIL COUNCIL PROFILE PREPARED BY, TOWN DIRECTORS OFFICE, P.O. BOX 475, KASULU FOREWORD Kasulu Town Council forms a part of Kigoma Region, the region that is situated at the extreme Western part of the Republic of Tanzania. Kasulu Town Council is a new Local Government Authority established with effect from 1st July, 2011 through Parliamentary letter signed in Dodoma on 19th April, 2012 under the Local Government (Urban Authorities) ACT (Cap 288). Kasulu Town Council covers total area of 878.8 Km² approximately 11.5% of the total area of District. According to 2012 Population and Housing Census the total population of Kasulu Town Council was 208,244 having an annual population growth rate of 2.4% per annum which is below national average growth rate of 2.7%. The life expectancy of people estimated to reach 52 years. In 2017 total population is approximated to 234,462. Kasulu Town Council is a land for investment found in the North -Eastern part of Kigoma Region. It is a junction with linking roads to Kibondo, Uvinza and Buhigwe districts respectively. The people of Kasulu Town Council widening the markets through International business exchange with businessmen from the Republic of Burundi. Its natural geographical position, topography, soil fertility, favorable climatic conditions with reliable infrastructures, and to date the council is electrified by thermal power of 2.5MW that makes Kasulu Town to be the best option for investors. The Council is proud of production of food crops like maize, beans, banana and cassava just to name the few, and cash crops such as coffee and sunflower.
    [Show full text]
  • Socio-Economic Assessment in the Refugees Camps and Hosting Districts of Kigoma Region
    SOCIO-ECONOMIC ASSESSMENT IN THE REFUGEES CAMPS AND HOSTING DISTRICTS OF KIGOMA REGION Final report – 20 April 2018 Juliana Masabo, Senior Lecturer, University of Dar es Salaam Opportuna Kweka, Senior Lecturer, University of Dar es Salaam Clayton Boeyink, PhD Student, University of Edinburgh Jean-Benoît Falisse, Lecturer, University of Edinburgh CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF FORCED MIGRATION UNIVERSITY OF DAR ES SALAAM 1 [Title page picture: Nyarugusu refugee camp: 18.02.2018] EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents the socio-economic situation (livelihoods) of the refugees and host communities living in and around the camps of Nyarugusu, Nduta, and Mtendeli in the region of Kigoma. In line with a growing body of research on the economic lives of refugees (including in Western Tanzania), it describes the many attempts of the refugees to develop economic activities. It finds that, despite a challenging legal environment, their contribution to the economy of the region is positive. The refugees hosted are mostly Burundians who left their country from 2015. A majority seems to be “repeat” refugees who have already lived in Tanzania as refugees in the 1990s. Some were even displaced to Tanzania during the 1972 Hutu genocide in Burundi. Nyarugusu camp also hosts a strong Congolese contingent (84,418 refugees and asylum seekers as per UNHCR Tanzania Refugee Situation Statistical Report 28.02.2018). The camps are located in the poorest region of Tanzania, in three districts that struggle to attract investment in industry or other job-producing sectors and where international aid is a welcomed source of cash. The Kigoma region has a long history of hosting refugees from Burundi and Congo.
    [Show full text]
  • Revenue Studies for 8 Lgas in Kigoma
    REVENUE STUDIES FOR EIGHT LOCAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES IN KIGOMA REGION LOCAL INVESTMENT CLIMATE (LIC) APRIL 10, 2017 Dr.Victor George Dr. Alex Kira Dr. Elia John Mr. Sunga Mabeja, Mr. Salum Ntomola, Miss Claudia Maswe Miss Jesca Kitogoro and Mr. Daudi Mwasantaja i Executive Summary This study was conducted in order to draw detailed evidence to eight Kigoma Local Government Authorities (LGAs) namely; Kigoma Municipal Council, Kigoma District Council, Uvinza District Council, Kasulu District Council, Kasulu Town Council, Buhigwe District Council, Kibondo District Council, and Kakonko District Council on the best ways of increasing revenues without creating misunderstanding with private sector. Furthermore, the study assessed existing and potential sources of revenue for these LGAs. The study employed multiple methods of data collections ranging from document reviews to Key Informant Interviews. The following were the key study findings: • The structure of collection at LGAs own sources are dominated by two channels; the LGA itself and commissioned agencies. On the first channel, the LGA uses its own staff under the Municipal Director/District Executive Director (DED) with the support of Head of Departments1 and LGA staff members. On the second channel, the LGA tend to source and commission some of the revenue channels to agencies. • Revenue Collection Trend: It was observed that collections have been rising with time across the region. However, the trend varies and is inconsistency between LGAs. The study has found that there was an increasing trend on actual revenue collection for Kakonko, Kibondo and Uvinza District Councils, while there was a decreasing trend of revenue collection for Kasulu and Kigoma District Councils.
    [Show full text]
  • Kigoma Region Socio-Economic Profile
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA PRESIDENT’S OFFICE REGIONAL ADMINISTRATION AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS KIGOMA REGION SOCIO-ECONOMIC PROFILE AUGUST, 2016 i [Type text] Page SECTION I 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Geographical Location Kigoma Region is located in the Western part of Tanzania between latitudes 3.6 and 6.5 degrees South and longitudes 29.5 and 31.5 degrees East along the shores of Lake Tanganyika, the second deepest fresh water lake in the world. The capital municipality, which draws its name from the regional name Kigoma, has a wonderful natural beauty, nestled under the hills of the western arm of the Great Rift Valley on the edge of the Lake. In the wet season, the place is especially spectacular, with its emerald green and clear sparkling water. In the North, the region borders with Burundi and Kagera Region; it borders Shinyanga and Tabora in the East; Rukwa Region to the South and the Democratic Republic of Congo in the West. 1.2 Surface Area The total surface area of Kigoma region is 45,075 sq. km, out of this, 36,523 sq. km or 81 percent is land area while 8,552 sq. km or 19 percent is covered by water. Kigoma region surface area is about 4.8 percent of Tanzania mainland. On district basis, (as shown in Table 1) the largest proportion of the area is in Uvinza District Council followed by Kibondo District Council. Uvinza District Council covers 26.4 percent of the total regional area. The second is Kibondo District Council with 19.6 percent of the total regional area.
    [Show full text]
  • Final Project Completion Report
    CEPF SMALL GRANT FINAL PROJECT COMPLETION REPORT Organization Legal Name: NYAKITONTO YOUTH FOR DEVELOPMENT TANZANIA Participatory action to safeguard Malagarasi Ecosystem and enforce EIA to mitigate ongoing and emerging threats in Key Project Title: Biodiversity hotspot areas of the Malagarasi Basin System around Lake Tanganyika in Kigoma, Tanzania Date of Report: February 29, 2016 • Project Manager • RAMADHAN JOEL NKEMBANYI :Phone : +255765794896 Report Author and Contact • Email: [email protected] Information • [email protected] • Face book : www.facebook.com/ramadhan.joel or https://www.facebook.com/NYDT-Tanzania-Youth- Development CEPF Region: Eastern Afromontane hotspot. Strategic Direction: Strategic Direction 2.2 Improve the protection and management of the KBA network throughout the hotspot. Grant Amount: US $10,000 Project Dates: March 2015- February 29, 2016 Implementation Partners for this Project (please explain the level of involvement for each partner): The following are partners who contributed much in the implementation of this project:- ➢ GEJ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANCY LTD ✓ Through the fund from CEPF , GEJ ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTANCY LTD was hired by Nyakitonto youth for development Tanzania due to the signed contract , GEJ had the following activities. i. GEJ trained 13 NYDT Staff ( 8 males and 5 females) on the procedures of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental Audit (EA) and Environmental Act of 2004. ii. GEJ trained 30( 17 males and 13 females) Regional task force Team on the procedures of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental Audit (EA) and Environmental Act of 2004. iii. GEJ trained 30 District task force Team, on the procedures of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) Environmental Audit (EA) and Environmental Act of 2004.
    [Show full text]
  • United Republic of Tanzania Kigoma Youth Agricultural Development Organization
    UNITED REPUBLIC OF TANZANIA KIGOMA YOUTH AGRICULTURAL DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATION Project Title: TECHNICAL AND FINANCIAL PROPOSAL FOR ADVOCACY FOR SEXUAL REPRODUCTIOVE HEALTH RIGHTS IN KIGOMA REGION Project Duration: MAY, 2020- APRIL, 2021 AMOUNT REQUESTED TZS: 115,394,999/= EQUIVALENT TO U$ 49,961.03US DOLLAR Submitted by: KIYADO CONTACT PERSON LEOPOLD HENERIKO EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR P.O.BOX 137, KIBONDO TANZANIA Mobile: +255753364175 E-mail: [email protected] FEBRUARY,2020 1 BACKGROUND INFORMATION 1.0 BACKGROUND THE ORGANIZATION Kigoma Youth Agricultural Development Organization (KIYADO) is registered under the Non Governmental Organization Act Na.24 of 2002 under sub section 12. The official registration of the organization was done on 19th November, 2010 and certificate of registration number 6NGO/00004273 was given to commence its operations. The organization is also registered under and complying with various government Authorities including Tanzania Revenue Authority (TRA) as Pay as you earn tax payer with certificate number 129-935-928, LAPF pension Fund with certificate number PC 140 as a contributing employer and Workers compensation Fund with Registration Number 008365. See annex 3: Legal documents of KIYADO’s. KIYADO’s Mission is “To improve community livelihood through skills and knowledge empowerment for sustainable Development in Kigoma Region” and Vision statement of the organization “To be excellent organization contributing to rural community Social welfare improvement by 2030 in Kigoma Region and Tanzania”. Core program of the organization include: Rural livelihood (Youth, Women Leadership & Economic Empowerment, Youth Employability skills Development in informal and formal Sectors of economy, Reproductive Health and Sexual Reproductive Rights, Gender equality and Women Empowerment in priority agricultural Value chain, Environmental management, Governance and accountability, Childhood Development and rights to access to education opportunities.
    [Show full text]