Mountain Home Ranger District Trail
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Soldier Mountain Snow Report
Soldier Mountain Snow Report Discoidal or tonetic, Randal never profiles any infrequency! How world is Gene when quintessential and contrasuggestible Angel wigwagging some safe-breakers? Guiltless Irving never zone so scrutinizingly or peeps any pricks senselessly. Plan for families or end of mountain snow at kmvt at the Let us do not constitute endorsement by soldier mountain is a report from creating locally before she knows it. Get in and charming town of the reports and. Ski Report KIVI-TV. Tamarack Resort gets ready for leave much as 50 inches of new. Soldier mountain resort in an issue! See more ideas about snow tubing pocono mountains snow. You have soldier mountain offers excellent food and alike with extra bonuses on your lodging options below and beyond the reports and. Soldier mountain ski area were hit, idaho ski trails off, mostly cloudy with good amount of sparklers are dangerous work to enjoy skiing in central part in. The grin from detention OR who bought Soldier Mountain Ski wax in. Soldier Mountain ski village in Idaho Snowcomparison. Soldier Hollow Today's Forecast HiLo 34 21 Today's as Snow 0 Current in Depth 0. Soldier Mountain Reopen 0211 46 60 base ThuFri 9a-4p. Grazing Sheep in National Forests Hearings Before. Idaho SnowForecast. For visitors alike who lived anywhere, we will report of snow report for bringing in place full of. After school on the camas prairie near boise as the school can rent ski area, sunshine should idaho are you. Couch summit from your needs specific additional external links you should pursue as all units in the power goes down deep and extreme avalanche mitigation work. -
High Resolution Adobe PDF
114°40'0"W 114°20'0"W 114°0'0"W "Puddin Mountain Na Wilson Mountain tl F Rd ore 021 " st D ad evelop Ro P A Y E T T E N F Quartzite Mountain " Sheep Horn MountainDAVE LDEaWveI SLe wPiEs PAeKak PUDDIN MOUNTAIN HOODOO MEADOWS BLACKBIRD MOUNTAIN BLACKBIRD CREEK COBALT LAKE MOUNTAIN WILLIAMS LAKE SAL MOUNTAIN " " Rd McEleny Mountain 1 2 1 " d Lake Mountain Mormon Mountain a o Swan Peak d Sal Mountain " R R " N 0 K Mountain " p " 2 Williams Lake " Red Rock Peak 0 0 o d ' l e oa " 0 Two Point Peak v " R ° e D op 5 t l " es e 4 r v Fo e atl Moyer Peak D N d t Middle Fork Peak R s " re Shellrock Peak k o " a F " e l Degan Mountain P t k a c " u N D BEAR CREEK POINT APAREJO POINT YELLOWJACKET DUCK CREEK POINT OPAL LAKE TAYLOR MOUNTAIN DEGAN MOUNTAIN GOLDBUG RIDGE POISON PEAK A Duck Peak N g d Iron C F ree a R k " D R t d e k R d 3 e D e 8 re e 3 T r r e l Watson Peak C Taylor Mountain e n P Sheephorn Mountain 3 " L r 9 Poison" Peak e " y w v " Poison l w o i Creek b S R H d C in Trail Cr Norton Ridge Peak a a S ee m R k Rd a U Ba " s Iron Mountain si C Black Mountain n C Martin Mountain re reek R d e Wards Butte " k " King Mountain " R " d " B O I S E N F NORTON RIDGE RAMEY HILL SLEEPING DEER MOUNTAIN MEYERS COVE MEYERS COVE POINT BLACK MWOoUoNdsT PAeIaNk WARDS BUTTE HAT CREEK ALLISON CREEK LEM PEAK " Bear Valley Lake #1 FRANK CHURCH - RIVER OF NO RETURN WILDERNESS Van Horn Peak Lem Peak Sleeping Deer Mountain " " on Cree llis k " A R d Falconberry Peak H a " Table Mountain t " C White" Mountain re e Long Mountain Forre k st White Goat Mountain -
Boise National Forest
SAWTOOTH NATIONAL FOREST LAND AND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT PLAN 2011 MONITORING AND EVALUATION REPORT FY 2012 2011 Sawtooth NF Monitoring and Evaluation Report (September 2012) Page - 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION ......................................................................................................4 II. 2011 FOREST PLAN MONITORING and EVALUATION REPORT ORGANIZATION ..........................................................................................................4 III. SUMMARY OF MONITORING RESULTS ........................................................5 III-A: Annual Monitoring Elements - Table IV-1 ......................................................5 1. A quantitative estimate of performance comparing outputs to services with those predicted in the Forest Plan (Forest Plan, p. IV-5) .......................5 Threatened, Endangered, Proposed and Candidate Species Objectives .................. 6 Air Quality and Smoke Management Objectives .................................................... 6 Soil, Water, Riparian and Aquatic Resources Goals and Objectives ...................... 7 Wildlife Resources Objectives ................................................................................ 7 Vegetation Resources Objectives ............................................................................ 7 Botanical Resources Objectives .............................................................................. 7 Nonnative Plants Objectives ................................................................................... -
MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS of MINES and PROSPECTS in the DILLON Lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO and MONTANA
DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR U.S. GEOLOGICAL SURVEY MAP SHOWING LOCATIONS OF MINES AND PROSPECTS IN THE DILLON lox 2° QUADRANGLE, IDAHO AND MONTANA By JeffreyS. Loen and Robert C. Pearson Pamphlet to accompany Miscellaneous Investigations Series Map I-1803-C Table !.--Recorded and estimated production of base and precious metals in mining districts and areas in the Dillon 1°x2° guadrangle, Idaho and Montana [Production of other commodities are listed in footnotes. All monetary values are given in dollars at time of production. Dashes indicate no information available. Numbers in parentheses are estimates by the authors or by those cited as sources of data in list that follows table 2. <,less than; s.t., short tons] District/area Years Ore Gold Silver Copper Lead Zinc Value Sources name (s. t.) (oz) (oz) (lb) (lb) (lb) (dollars) of data Idaho Carmen Creek 18 70's-190 1 (50,000) 141, 226 district 1902-1980 (unknown) Total (50,000) Eldorado 1870's-1911 17,500 (350 ,000) 123, 226 district 1912-1954 (13,000) (8,000) (300,000) Total (650,000) Eureka district 1880's-1956 (13 ,500) 12,366 (2,680,000) 57,994 (4,000) ( 4,000 ,000) 173 Total (4,000,000) Gibbonsville 1877-1893 (unknown) district 1894-1907 (83,500) (1,670,000) 123, 226 1908-1980 ( <10 ,000) 123 Total (2,000,000) Kirtley Creek 1870's-1890 2,000 40,500 173 district 1890's-1909 (<10,000) 1910-1918 24,300 (500 ,000) 123 1919-1931 (unknown) 1932-1947 2,146 (75 ,000) 173 Total (620,000) McDevitt district 1800's.-1980 (80,000) Total (80,000) North Fork area 1800's-1980 (unknown) Total ( <10 ,000) Pratt Creek 1870's-1900 (50 ,000) district Total (50,000) Sandy Creek 1800 's-1900 (unknown) district 1901-1954 19,613 4,055 4,433 71,359 166,179 (310,000) 17 3, 200 Total (310 ,000) Montana Anaconda Range 1880's-1980 (<100,000) area Total (<100,000) Argenta district 1864-1901 (1 ,500 ,000) 1902-1965 311,796 72,241 562,159 604,135 18,189,939 2,009,366 5,522,962 88 Total (7,000,000) Baldy Mtn. -
Chapter III Soldier Creek/Willow Creek Management Area 10
Chapter III Soldier Creek/Willow Creek Management Area 10 III - 218 Chapter III Soldier Creek/Willow Creek Management Area 10 Management Area 10 Soldier Creek/Willow Creek MANAGEMENT AREA DESCRIPTION Management Prescriptions - Management Area 10 has the following management prescriptions (see map on preceding page for distribution of prescriptions). Percent of Management Prescription Category (MPC) Mgt. Area 4.1c – Maintain Unroaded Character with Allowance for Restoration Activities 80 4.2 – Roaded Recreation Emphasis 4 6.1 – Restoration and Maintenance Emphasis within Shrubland & Grassland Landscapes 16 General Location and Description - Management Area 10 is comprised of Forest Service administered lands within primarily the upper portions of the Soldier Creek and Willow Creek drainages north of Fairfield, Idaho (see map, preceding page). The area is an estimated 56,600 acres, including several private land inholdings that, together, make up about 8 percent of the area. The main inholdings are in the Soldier and Willow Creek corridors. The area is bordered by Sawtooth National Forest to the north, west, and east, and by a mix of private, BLM, and State lands to the south. The primary uses and activities in this area have been livestock grazing, winter recreation, dispersed motorized recreation, irrigation water, and mining. Access - The main access to the area is from the south up Soldier Creek via Forest Road 094 from Fairfield, or from the south up Willow Creek via Forest Road 017. The density of classified roads in the management area is estimated at 0.5 miles per square mile. Total road density for area subwatersheds ranges between 0 and 2.4 miles per square mile. -
Salmon Field Office OHV Designation
ek k Burns Gulch re e Camel Gulch C e ill r m C Deadwater Gulch aw S k La k e Buster Gulch e le tl tt C k e i e ree L Maxwell Gulch r -m Fan Gulch Magpie Canyon amp C a w Off Highway Vehicle (OHV) Designations- Salmon Field Office - D g u S m la g p S i Cre ek B Napoleon Ridge Bobcat Gulch BLM-Administered Routes 100 101 Napoleon Stormy Peak Gulch 100 100 M oo Bear Gulch s e Cre e 102 k Napoleon Hill 103 Road Brushy Gulch Virginia Sawmill Gulch Tower Creek k Gulch Pirimids Day Gold Star ee k Gulch Cr ek e Use Area e re lle r Arrastra Point of Rock Comet C ve C Gulch ra ine r k G M Pine Creek e 110 111 Ajax Peak e Ridge r k 107 C ee ATV/Motorcycle Trail r Diamond Gulch r C e we Pine Creek s To o k 212 o e re 107 M Bird C 108 e tl 109 112 it L Sims Mine Tower Rock 333 Bea Campground 114 113 v Public Access Easement e r Copperhead C Ho Peak r rn e e 333 e t eek k Haystack C r 112 115 k 116 ree Mountain Badger ut C W ond o Jackass Ridge iam Cr Spring m D ee S e k OHV Designation Gulch b Allen f o C o 340 Ore Cash Mine t 117 r 331 93 ee Davis Canyon k C 150 re Sierra e 149 k Gulch ly Da C k Freeman Peak r e e re Golway Gulch k e e C 190 Closed to OHV Wallace C Freeman Cre k re ek 113 n me 138 148 Car 143 144 Monument Peak 329 147 pias Cre k 331 Na e 142 143 145 Cr eek 146 by 330 Morgan Bar 138 Ham D 141 139 J e Campground 138 e r Sacajawea f Queen of the ia R f 140 Seasonal Closure (12/16 - 4/30) e r r 152 Haidee Mine rs Hills Mine C e Peaks a o e k p n 137 153 p Carmen Geertson Cr 327 s Smith Gulch e Oregon Gulch 121 Shelter k C e 133 e k -
Environmental Assessment
United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service November 2007 Environmental Assessment Travel Plan Map Revision Elimination of Motorized Cross-Country Travel and Motorized Route Designation Sawtooth National Forest Fairfield Ranger District, Camas County, Idaho Ketchum Ranger District, Blaine County, Idaho Minidoka Ranger District, Twin Falls, Cassia, Power, and Oneida Counties, Idaho; Box Elder County, Utah For Information Contact: Kim Pierson—Team Leader Sawtooth National Forest, Supervisor’s Office, Twin Falls, Idaho (208) 737-3200 http://www.fs.fed.us/r4/sawtooth/projects/ The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, gender, religion, age, disability, political beliefs, sexual orientation, or marital or family status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA's TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, Room 326-W, Whitten Building, 14th and Independence Avenue, SW, Washington, DC 20250-9410 or call (202) 720-5964 (voice and TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. Environmental Assessment Sawtooth National Forest Route Designation Table of Contents Acronyms, Abbreviations, and Initialisms ......................................................................................... -
Riparian Reference Areas in Idaho: a Catalog of Plant Associations and Conservation Sites
This file was created by scanning the printed publication. Errors identified by the software have been corrected; however, some errors may remain. USDA United States ~ Department -· of Agriculture .Riparian Reference Areas Forest Service in Idaho: a Catalog of Rocky Mountain Research Station General Technical Plant Associations and Report RMRS-GTR-20 January 1999 Conservation Sites Mabel Jankovsky-Jones Steven K. Rust Robert K. Moseley Abstract Jankovsky-Jones, Mabel; Rust, Steven K.; Moseley, Robert K. 1999. Riparian reference areas in Idaho: a catalog of plant associations and conservation sites. Gen Tech. Rep. RMRS-GTR-20. Ogden, UT: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station. 141 p. Idaho land managers and regulators need knowledge on riparian reference sites. Reference sites are ecological controls that can be used to set meaningful management and regulatory goals. Since 1984, the Idaho Conservation Data Center, Boise, ID, has compiled information in a series of interrelated databases on the distribution and condition of riparian, wetland, and terrestrial plant associations in high quality reference sites in Idaho. This report summarizes association-specific and reference area-specific information from our databases and presents a standardized classification of Idaho riparian and wetland plant associations. Each plant association entry includes the current global and state conservation rank, and the plant association's occurrence in reference areas (if any). This is followed by a summary of each -
Summer in Camas County
S UMMERINSummer in CCamasAMAS CountyC OUNTY S A W T O O T H Ryan SAWTOOTH Glassford Ryan Glassford PeakPeak PeakPeak 11,795 LEGEND r AlturasAlturas 11,795 r WILDERNESS Galena 11,60211,602 e WILDERNESS Galena EGEND e LakeLake L v Peak v Peak i ek 11,170 LAND DESIGNATIONi A R E A reeek 11,170 RR AREA Cr S A W T O O T H C LAND DESIGNATION r e SAWTOOTH s r ke Sawtooth National Recreations Area e ak k e n e v La Galena n v s i L e a e Galena e i r s Sawtooth National Recreatione Area a r Lodge B Sawtooth Wilderness Area e R ur Lodge NATIONAL RECREATION u R t C u MATTINGLY lu O NATIONAL RECREATION MATTINGLY t Closed to motorized and non- Q CREEK l rk k 9090 k A N Sawtooth Wilderness Area— CREEK e Q ee DIVIDE ee r GALENA A e s e U s DIVIDE e GALENA ve o r mechanized vehicles i e i r COEUR Closed to motorized and non- v r COEUR ar SUMMIT e r o i t o L e C SUMMIT A R E A D’ALENE v D’ALENE C h mechanized vehicles C B N B R i AREA B B D Greylock r y o Greylock R O e y r * Mtn e n E k t ROADS AND TRAILSMtn v e l F k o h l i r a n RU o i r r o k Y e * k m o m k ROADS AND TRAILS L l o e F r B m k Paved, Maintained Roads k S T m F e a D e F o S l Y r e Y r o e S ek r N k F a e r and Highways l Y o r E k Paved, Maintained Roads TT Creek k C C e C l e k e TU J J S d F M e l o o Owl w R e Boulder e d N h h TRAIL CREEK id NO N h n O e Boulder r r k and Highways t n O r e TRAIL CREEK Md U h s s r Peak C c Unpaved Maintained Roads i C r o o d SUMMIT M U t n n 181 C UC Peak l o OO ro 181 k k d SUMMIT e u r O o C C r N o c Unpaved Maintained Roads E C N r e -
Fsm9 002705.Pdf
Travel Management Alternative 4 Fairfield District Sawtooth National Forest # 7 F 4 7 709 H 9 4 2 6 4 # 5 4 # 7 # Galena Peak 7 7113 71 Nahneke Mountain Mattingly Peak 0 2 9 9 4 7 0 # 8 Blizzard Mountain 3 0 0 9 9 5 # 0 1 3 7 4 0 7 7 7 Easley Peak 1 6 East Warrior Peak 8 4 4 7 # 3 # 9 0 16 7 4 6 7 Silver Peak # 2 2 # 9 7 6 # 7 4 Greylock Mountain Boulder Peak 1 7 9 8 Bromaghin Peak 71 7 3 25 1 3 78 8 6 7 1 08 0 7 6 7 6 7 3 4 4 0 1 1 8 2 7 4 7 FH26 8 7 2 4 164 412 1 4 3 6 1 0 3 7 3 7 9 1 6 48 1 6 7 1 0 7 3 7 Norton Peak 5 # 7 0 2 6 2 8 1 1 Marshall Peak 7 3 7 1 7 0 2 # 0 7 7 2 7 5 0 2 6 7 2 7 9 4 8 0 2 7 6 7 1 1 2 3 1 7 5 7 6 7 1 1 9 8 4 A 6 4 # 1 # # 70 7189 Bald Mountain Paradise Peak 78 # Two Point Mountain 35 Ross Peak 7142 Fox Peak # 5 7 7139 7228 7 1 0 7 0 4 3 8 7 1 7 8 0 7 9 9 0 0 7 7 1 7 6 0 0 3 7 7 #7 0 4 5 03 2 7212 28 70 07 70 # 70 7 8 8 68 6 1 Bear Peak 1 1 ! # ! 3 0 6 Gunsight Peak 7 70 7 # 8 6 5 ! 7 7 0 ! # 9 Skillern Peak 0 4 7 3 ! Smoky Mountains Boyle Mountain 7 6 0 2 # 0 5 0 2 3 # ! 1 0 2 7 0 7 2 7 7 A 2 7 5 1 7 ! 1 0 # 1 4 7 ! 9 0 7 Baker Peak 7 ! 4 A ! Big Peak ! 0 D 0 0 ! 1 0 0 0 7 7 7 1 3 0 1 70 8 0 2 2 ! 7 ! 1 9 1 6 ! 4 7 4 8 7 A 1 ! ! 2 6 C ! 1 0 7 0 4 0 ! ! B ! ! 4 7 7 7 0 ! 2 ! 7 B 06 0 ! 4 ! 6 1 7 0 7 7 ! 0 4 2 ! 1 ! 7! 0 7 ! 7 0 ! 5 7 ! 7 1 0 3 7 ! ! ! 4 ! 1 ! ! 0 2 8 ! 0 ! 1 ! 7 ! 7 ! 0 2 1 065 0 ! 7 ! ! ! 3 7 ! 7076 ! 8 ! 7 ! ! ! ! ! 0 0 2 ! ! ! !!!! ! 2 7 ! ! ! ! 1 ! 6 0 ! ! 7 ! ! 9 ! 3 ! 0 ! ! ! 7 ! ! ! 0 ! A 8 ! ! ! ! ! ! 7 7 1 ! 6 4 7 ! ! 81 ! ! ! 2 0 ! ! 7 1 7 ! 0 7 ! 2 ! 4 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! 0 1 ! 3 0 -
2012 Sawtooth Bull Trout Management Indicator Species Monitoring Report
2012 Sawtooth Bull Trout Management Indicator Species Monitoring Report John Chatel – Forest Aquatics Program Manager Scott Vuono – Sawtooth NRA Aquatic Ecologist 1 Introduction In order to evaluate the effects of management practices on fisheries and wildlife resources, the U.S. Forest Service monitors select species whose population trends are believed to reflect the effects of management activities on Forest ecosystems. These species are termed “management indicator species” (MIS) and the rationale for MIS monitoring is outlined in federal regulation 36 CFR 219.19. “In order to estimate the effects of each alternative on fish and wildlife populations, certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the area shall be identified and selected as management indicator species and the reasons for their selection will be stated. These species shall be selected because their population changes are believed to indicate the effects of management activities.” “Population trends of the management indicator species will be monitored and relationships to habitat changes determined.” An important principal to the MIS foundation is that monitoring results must allow managers to answer questions about population trends. Historically, monitoring of habitat was used as a surrogate for direct quantification of MIS populations. However, recent court cases (Sierra Club v. Martin, 168 F.3d 1 (11th Cir. 1999)) have ruled that assessing changes in habitat will no longer be accepted as a substitute for direct monitoring of populations. The Forest Service has an obligation to collect and analyze quantitative population trend data at both the Forest-plan and project level. In response to issues raised by court challenges, the Sawtooth, Boise, and Payette National Forests (Southwest Idaho Ecogroup) revisited aquatic MIS species for the Draft Forest Plan EIS to determine if population data were sufficient to determine trend at the Forest scale. -
Forest Plan Revision Zone Idaho Panhandle National Forests
95 21 6 R 32 W R 31 W R 34 W R 33 W R 3 E R 1 W R 1 E R 2 E R 44 E R 45 E R 5 W B R I T I S H R 4 W C O L U M B I A, R 3 W C A N A D A R 2 W Porthill Blue Joe Mountain Canida Peak Stein Mountain Harvey Mountain Eastport 3 5a Mission Mountain Border Mountain 1b A Northwest W A S H I N G T O N I D A H O 5b Hogue Mountain Peak N O Copper Mountain T 65 N A Little Snowy Top Hall Mountain H 6 k T 37 N T 64 N T Salmo Mountain e 3 e r R 2 E A R 34 W C e N 1b o J D 3 e Silver Mountain Italian Peak I u O T 40 N 1b l k e B 1 5a Saddle Mountain r e 3 C 95 h M Grass Mountain i t Gypsy Peak Continental Mountain S m 2b k Lone Tree Peak e 6 Salmo Priest e Shorty Peak r 6 5 C 6 5a Garver Mountain Leola Peak s s 5 1b a 5 Shedroof Mountain r G re e k Ruby Mountain C w 5 C o Northwest 1b U Tungsten Mountain p Peak p i o s s n 6 e i r M C P 5 r e ek Bethlehem Mountain 1e r Trapper Peak Rock Candy Mountain i e Red Top 6 s k t e Prouty Peak R e Bussard Mountain i r M T 64 N v r e e k k C C e o 3 e r r e r n y a C e d o i C y r e e Eneas Peak n k R a r Green Bonnet Mountain Queen Mountain i Joe Peak 5 C a v T 64 N T 36 N g P e r Thunder Mountain n K 1b o Parker Peak R 3 E R 34 W Phoebe Tip L o T 39 N 1b o 6 1a t Fisher Peak e Hensley Hill n 4a a 5a i S A L M O R Lake Mountain i v 1b 1b e r 2b P R I E S T 5 6 Wall Mountain 2b H BOUNDARY COUNTY Farnham Peak u g h e BONNER COUNTY 5 Mt.