How Sexually Dimorphic Are We? Review and Synthesis
Total Page：16
File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY 12:151–166 (2000) How Sexually Dimorphic Are We? Review and Synthesis MELANIE BLACKLESS, ANTHONY CHARUVASTRA, AMANDA DERRYCK, ANNE FAUSTO-STERLING,* KARL LAUZANNE, AND ELLEN LEE Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island ABSTRACT The belief that Homo sapiens is absolutely dimorphic with the respect to sex chromosome composition, gonadal structure, hormone lev- els, and the structure of the internal genital duct systems and external geni- talia, derives from the platonic ideal that for each sex there is a single, universally correct developmental pathway and outcome. We surveyed the medical literature from 1955 to the present for studies of the frequency of deviation from the ideal male or female. We conclude that this frequency may be as high as 2% of live births. The frequency of individuals receiving “cor- rective” genital surgery, however, probably runs between 1 and 2 per 1,000 live births (0.1–0.2%). Am. J. Hum. Biol. 12:151–166, 2000. © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Among primates, humans exhibit a mod- Money (1993) responded that he never made est sexual dimorphism with regard to char- such a claim. In fact, no well-documented acters such as body size or voice timbre overview of the frequency of intersex exists at (Fedigan, 1982). With respect to sex chro- present, and it is this lacuna that we address mosome composition, gonadal structure, in the present article. The question is of in- hormone levels, and the structure of the in- terest to students of human development, ternal genital duct systems and external medical practitioners, and human biologists, genitalia, however, we generally consider among others. Recently, the practice of surgi- Homo sapiens to be absolutely dimorphic. cally altering the genitals of intersexual in- Biologists and medical scientists recognize, fants to conform to assumptions about ab- of course, that absolute dimorphism is a solute dimorphism has been questioned (Fausto-Sterling, 1995/1996; Post, 1995/ Platonic ideal not actually achieved in the 1996; Sandberg, 1995/1996; Walcutt, 1995/ natural world. Nonetheless, the normative 1996; Diamond, 1996; Zucker, 1996; Dia- nature of medical science uses as an as- mond and Sigmundsen, 1997; Kessler, sumption, the proposition that for each sex 1998). Thus, both because of a theoretical there is a single, correct developmental interest in human sexual dimorphism and pathway. Medical scientists, therefore, de- medical questions about the treatment of in- fine as abnormal any deviation from bimo- tersexuals, it is important to provide a fre- dally distributed genitalia or chromosomal quency baseline for the varied events which composition (Conte and Grumbach, 1989). lead to intersexuality. If, however, one relinquishes an a priori be- lief in complete genital dimorphism, one can METHODS examine sexual development with an eye to- We surveyed the medical literature from ward variability rather than bimodality. 1955 to the present for studies of the fre- Conte and Grumbach (1989) list more than 25 diagnoses affecting sexual differ- entiation. While the incidence of some in- dividual medical syndromes is fairly well Contract grant sponsor: Office of University President Vartan established, the overall frequency of inter- Gregorian. *Correspondence to: Anne Fausto-Sterling, Department of sexuality is a matter of dispute. Fausto- Molecular and Cell Biology and Biochemistry, Brown Univer- Sterling (1993a,b) cited a figure attributed to sity, Providence, RI 02912. E-mail: [email protected] John Money that the frequency of intersexu- Received 5 November 1997; Revision received 10 December ality might be as high as 4% of live births, but 1998; Accepted 14 December 1998 © 2000 Wiley-Liss, Inc. PROD #M97083R2 152 M. BLACKLESS ET AL. quency of deviation from the ideal male or from an XX (female) or XY (male) chromo- female. For a few rare syndromes, we con- somal make-up. An XO condition produces sidered the literature which predates 1955. individuals with female external genitalia Our sources included population surveys, and streak gonads which are incapable of genetic studies, case surveys from indi- fetal or pubertal gonadal hormone synthesis vidual medical practitioners, and environ- and a variety of somatic alterations, while mental population studies. In addition to 47,XXX girls develop secondary sex charac- Medline as a starting point, government teristics at puberty and are sometimes fer- documents, bibliographies in textbooks, pre- tile (Buckton, 1983). XXY individuals diag- viously located review articles, and specific nosed with Klinefelter syndrome have ex- articles provided additional sources. We did ternal male genitalia, small testes, not exclude any articles which contained impaired spermatogenesis, and frequent gy- frequency estimates derived from an unse- necomastia. XXYY individuals are consid- lected population. Rather, where appropri- ered karyotypic variants of Klinefelter syn- ate we indicate the limitations of particular drome (Conte and Grumbach, 1989; Zinn et publications. al., 1993). XYY males are taller, on average, We define the typical male as someone than XY males, and commonly exhibit un- with an XY chromosomal composition, and derdeveloped testes (Vogel and Motulsky, testes located within the scrotal sac. The 1979). Recent work, however, suggests that testes produce sperm which, via the vas def- many 47,XXY and 47,XYY males are undi- erens, may be transported to the urethra agnosed because they present no symptoms and ejaculated outside the body. Penis which prompt a chromosomal analysis length at birth ranges from 2.5 to 4.5 cm (Flatau et al., 1975); an idealized penis has (Abramsky and Chapple, 1997). The cat- a completely enclosed urethra which opens egory of XX males, which involves the trans- at the tip of the glans. During fetal develop- location or deletion of a submicroscopic sec- ment, the testes produce the Mullerian in- tion of the sex determining region of the Y hibiting factor, testosterone, and dihy- chromosome, is morphologically and geneti- drotestosterone, while juvenile testicular cally heterogeneous (Lo´pez et al., 1995). activity ensures a masculinizing puberty. Table 1 summarizes the results of 17 The typical female has two X chromosomes, studies of the frequencies of XXYY, XX functional ovaries which ensure a feminiz- (male), 47,XXX, and XYY individuals at ing puberty, oviducts connecting to a uterus, birth. The total frequency ranges from 0.002 cervix and vaginal canal, inner and outer to 2.15/1,000 live births, with a mean of vaginal lips, and a clitoris, which at birth 0.639/1,000 and a standard deviation of ranges in size from 0.20 to 0.85 cm (Ober- 0.665. The mean/1,000 live births and stan- field et al., 1989). In this article, we ask how dard deviations for each of the non-XX, non- often development meets these exacting cri- XY chromosome compositions listed in teria for males and females. Table 1 are 0.155 (0.185) for XXYY, 0.05 The literature which reports the frequen- (0.019) for XX males, 0.47 (0.364) for 47, cies of syndromes that produce intersexual- XXX, and 0.639 (0.665) for XYY. ity varies in quality and quantity. In some In 24 different estimates of the frequency cases there are multiple surveys with large of Klinefelter syndrome (XXY), the inci- numbers replicated over many years and in dence ranges from 0 (out of 3,890 births) to many different geographical locations. In 2.13/1,000 births. The mean incidence for all others no data exist with which to estimate 24 studies is 0.922/1,000 live births with a frequency, while in still others the lack of standard error of 0.102 (Table 2). The 18 better data dictated reliance on one or a different estimates for the population fre- small number of reports of uncertain qual- quency of XO chromosome constitution are ity. In each case the available data are pre- shown in Table 3. The incidence ranges sented. The strength or weakness of an es- from 0.0 for five small studies (sample size timate is also indicated. of less than 3,993) to 1.67/1,000 live births. The mean is 0.369/1,000 live births, with a “SEX” CHROMOSOME COMPOSITION standard error of 0.111. Recent data show- Individuals with XXY, XO, XYY, XXYY, ing that not all Turner patients present XX males, and 47,XXX females comprise the with XO identifiable by traditional karyol- most frequently encountered deviations ogy suggest that the incidence calculated FREQUENCY OF INTERSEXUALITY 153 TABLE 1. Incidence of XXYY, XX(male), 47,XXX and XYY births in 17 published surveys* Total # Incidence/1,000 Location Year surveyed XXYY XX male 47,XXX XYY live births Method Reference Edinburgh 1964 20,725 1 11 0.575 Bsa Maclean et al., 1964 Geneva 1968 8,184 1 0.122 Bs Mikamo, 1968 London 1969 2,081 4 1.922 K Sergovich et al., 1969 New Haven 1970 4,366 3 3 1.374 K Lubs, 1970 Toronto 1974 73,229 1 2 2 0.068 Bs/K Bell, 1974 Moscow 1974 2,500 1 0.400 K Bochkov et al., 1974 Winnipeg 1975 13,939 5 7b 0.861 K Hamerton et al., 1975 Ontario 1976 930 2 2.150 K Lin et al., 1976 Denver 1976 40,371 12 0.297 Bs/K Goad et al., 1976 USA 1977 13,751 1 0.073 K Walzer et al., 1977 Tokyo 1978 12,319 3 0.244 K Higurasi et al., 1979 Edinburgh 1979 23,196 1 11 0.517 Bs/K Ratcliffe et al., 1979 Edinburgh 1980 3,993 3 4 0.002 K Buckton et al., 1980 USA 1982 19,675 25 0.001 K Schreinemacher et al., 1982 Telemark 1982 1,830 1 0.546 K Hansteen et al., 1982 Belgium 1988 77,000 32c 0.416 K Kleczkowska et al., 1988 Denmark 1991 34,910 5d 2 18 20b 1.289 K Nielsen, 1991 Average total/1,000 0.155 0.05 0.470 0.865 0.639 live births (SD) (0.185) (0.019) (0.364) (0.740) (0.665) *K, karyotype.