DOCSLIB.ORG

George Grey's Whalers

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
George Grey's Whalers George Grey’s whalers Part 1: Report on Kalbarri Site Inspection,16 October 2005 Part 2: Report on the Site Survey and Excavation 23–27 January 2006 Picture of one of Grey’s Whalers on the beach taken from Grey’s Journals of Two Expeditions of Discovery in Northwest and Western Australia, During the Years 1837, 38 and 39 Edited by Jennifer Rodrigues Report—Department of Maritime Archaeology Western Australian Museum, No. 210 2006 © Department of Maritime Archaeology, Western Australian Museum Table of Contents List of Figures iii List of Tables iv PART 1: Report on Kalbarri Site Inspection,16 October 2005 1 Acknowledgements 2 Abstract 2 Introduction 2 Historical background associated with the area 2 Grey and his exploration of the northwest coast 2 From Bernier to Dorre Island 3 From Dorre Island to the Gascoyne 4 From the Gascoyne to Bernier Island 4 Landing at Gantheume Bay 6 Initial discovery of main site 8 Location of site 9 Artefacts recovered from the site (1995–2005) 12 Other sites in close proximity 13 Registration of artefacts 16 Environment 17 General information of area 17 Threats to the site 17 Significance assessment 17 Discussion 18 Recommendations 18 Administration and correspondence 18 Appendix 1. News article featured in The Geraldton Guardian, 14 October 2005 19 Part 2: Report on the Site Survey and Excavation 23–27 January 2006 21 Acknowledgements 22 Technical data 23 Introduction 23 Site description 23 Administration 23 Preliminary search and survey 26 Site conditions 27 Metal detecting 27 Survey 28 Excavations 29 Trench 1 29 Trench 2 31 Post excavation 31 Registration of artefacts 32 Materials recovered during search, survey and excavations 32 Materials recovered outside of excavations 32 Photographs of finds 37 i Artefact analysis 38 Associated sites 38 Assessment of site significance 40 (i) Archaeological and historical 40 (ii) Scientific 40 (iii) Educational 40 (iv) Recreational 40 (v) Cultural 41 Site identification comments 41 Legislative issues 42 Recommendations 42 References 43 Appendix 1. Survey data 43 Appendix 2. DGPS recordings 44 Appendix 3. Kalbarri artefact registration from January 2006 expedition 45 Appendix 4. Waypoints for targets 200m south of excavation site 45 ii List of figures Figure 1. The district and River Glenelg on the north-west coast of Australia, 4 from the surveys of Captain George Grey (Governor of South Australia) taken in 1838. Figure 2. Map and Chart of the west coast of Australia from Swan River to Shark 5 Bay, including Houtman Abrolhos and Port Grey, from the surveys of Captain Grey, Wickham, King and from other official documents. Figure 3. Site of collapsed section where finds were recovered, looking east 7 (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). Figure 4. Cut within sand dune where Mr Finlay found lead shot, looking east 7 (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). Figure 5. Location of Kalbarri in Western Australia. 8 Figure 6. Area where Mr McDonnell found more lead shot and a lead fitting in 9 October 2005 (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). Figure 7. View main site, looking SW towards Blue Hole (Photo: Jen 10 Rodrigues). Figure 8. Pathway to beach accessed from car park, looking west (Photo: Jen 10 Rodrigues). Figure 9. Modern mooring chain, stretching seaward (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). 11 Figure 10. Close up view of chain links (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). 11 Figure 11. Lead shot recovered in 1995, total weight: 1415.5 g (UNID 4603) 12 (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). Figure 12. Samples from UNID 4603, showing ‘moulding’ marks (Photo: Jen 12 Rodrigues. Figure 13. Shot recovered in October 2005, total weight: 74.2 g (Photo: Jen 13 Rodrigues). Figure 14. Samples from UNID 4604, showing evidence of sprues (Photo: Jen 13 Rodrigues). Figure 15. Striations along the edge of the lead fitting (UNID 4605) (Photo: Jen 14 Rodrigues). Figure 16. Lead fitting weighing approximately 10.5 kg (UNID 1605) (Photo: 14 Jen Rodrigues). Figure 17. Bones 1 site, looking west (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). 15 Figure 18. Bones 2 site, looking north (Photo: Jen Rodrigues). 15 Figure 19. Close up view of Bones 2 site, close up looking north (Photo: Jen 16 Rodrigues). Figure 20. Aerial photograph showing site, Kalbarri and the Murchison River. 24 Figure 21. Looking at the site from sea. 24 Figure 22. Search and survey over reef. 25 Figure 23. Search and survey over reef. 25 Figure 24. Search and survey over reef. 26 Figure 25. Site before excavations. 27 Figure 26. Metal detecting around the foredune. 28 Figure 27. Visual transits of the site. 29 iii Figure 28. Recording with the DGPS. 30 Figure 29. Surveying with Total Station. 30 Figure 30. Survey points. 31 Figure 31. Total station coordinates showing Trench 1 and 2 within the blow 32 out. Figure 32. Total station coordinates showing the shape of the swale where the 32 site was located. Figure 33. Excavating Trench 1. 33 Figure 34. Trench 1, facing east. 33 Figure 35. Trench 1, facing south. 34 Figure 36. Profile of lead shot positions in Trench 1. 34 Figure 37. Sand fill in trench 1. 35 Figure 38. Tench 1 towards the left of image. 35 Figure 39. Trench 1, facing south. 36 Figure 40. The site after re-vegetation. 36 Figure 41. Lead shot, KG 4610. 37 Figure 42. Lead shot, KG 4611. 37 Figure 43. Lead shot, KG 4612. 37 Figure 44. Lead shot, KG 4613. 37 Figure 45. Lead shot, KG 4614. 37 Figure 46. Lead shot, KG 4617. 37 Figure 47. Lead shot, KG 4615. 37 Figure 48. Timber fragments, KG 4616. 38 Figure 49. Copper nail, KG 4619. 38 Figure 50. Iron fragments, KG 4618. 38 Tables Table 1. Artefact registration details. 16 iv Part 1 Report on Kalbarri Site Inspection,16 October 2005 ‘Attack of natives near Hanover Bay’, from a sketch by Captain George Grey. 1 Acknowledgements Thanks are due to Mr Mike McDonnell for accompanying a museum staff and assistant archaeologist to the site and providing information about his finds and metal detecting results. Mr McDonnell also showed the museum staff two other sites in close proximity, which contained remains of bones. In addition, Mr Ted King provided details of the finds and proffered other information that he felt could be related to certain features and artefacts discovered at the site. Mr Gary Finlay, the original finder, confirmed details of his earlier find. Ms Kelly Fleming, PhD candidate at University of Western Australia, assisted with the inspection. Research Chemist Ms Vicki Richards from the Department of Materials Conservation (Western Australian Museum), provided advice on the material identification and corrosion process of the lead fitting. Abstract Finders in Kalbarri, Western Australia, discovered lead shot as well as a lead fitting in the sand dunes of one of the local beaches. These were believed to be associated with the explorer George Grey who was wrecked in the vicinity in 1839. In October 2005, the site was inspected by a staff from the Department of Maritime Archaeology, Western Australian Museum, as a result of this discovery, which was reported to the Department. Two other sites, which contained bone fragments, were also recorded because these were in close proximity to the site where the archaeological finds were first discovered. Introduction A museum staff from the Department of Maritime Archaeology, Western Australian Museum, inspected a site in Kalbarri, Western Australia, on 16 October 2005. Three local residents from Kalbarri had recovered a large number of lead shot and a lead fitting between 1995 and 2005. The purpose of this inspection was to record the site, collect the artefacts from the finders, gather as much information as possible as well as obtain a GPS position of the site. The finds are of interest to the Museum because of their possible association with the George Grey expedition of 1839, although this has yet to be confirmed absolutely. Historical background associated with the area GREY AND HIS EXPLORATION OF THE NORTHWEST COAST After a long delay of nearly five months, Grey was finally able to leave Fremantle on 17 February 1839 aboard the 302-ton American whaler Russel in order to continue on his exploration of the Western Australian coast including areas of the country lying behind it. He obtained three whaleboats for this task along with a party of 11 support staff, which included a surgeon. Grey’s decision to procure three whaleboats was a precaution in the event an accident occurred which reduced the number of boats. The main objectives of the expedition was to obtain information on the real state of north western Australia, its resources, and the course and direction of its rivers and mountain ranges. It was also to familiarise the natives with the British name and character, to search for and record all information regarding the natural productions of the country, and all details that might bear upon its capabilities for colonisation or the reverse; as well as to collect specimens of its natural history (Grey, 1841: 4). Grey also intended to continue his examination of the section of the coast left unvisited southward of his depot, as far as Gantheume Bay (Grey, 1841: 330). Grey planned to land at a point northward of Shark Bay with a supply of provisions sufficient for five months. His intention was to establish a provision depot on an island 2 there so as to use that as a base point from which he and his team could carry out their operations of examining undiscovered areas of the bay (Grey, 1841: 329). On 25 February, Grey and his team along with their boats, food and other supplies, were disembarked on Bernier Island in Shark Bay. By the early morning of the following day, the men had finished burying their stores.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia
    Port Related Structures on the Coast of Western Australia By: D.A. Cumming, D. Garratt, M. McCarthy, A. WoICe With <.:unlribuliuns from Albany Seniur High Schoul. M. Anderson. R. Howard. C.A. Miller and P. Worsley Octobel' 1995 @WAUUSEUM Report: Department of Matitime Archaeology, Westem Australian Maritime Museum. No, 98. Cover pholograph: A view of Halllelin Bay in iL~ heyday as a limber porl. (W A Marilime Museum) This study is dedicated to the memory of Denis Arthur Cuml11ing 1923-1995 This project was funded under the National Estate Program, a Commonwealth-financed grants scheme administered by the Australian HeriL:'lge Commission (Federal Government) and the Heritage Council of Western Australia. (State Govenlluent). ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The Heritage Council of Western Australia Mr lan Baxter (Director) Mr Geny MacGill Ms Jenni Williams Ms Sharon McKerrow Dr Lenore Layman The Institution of Engineers, Australia Mr Max Anderson Mr Richard Hartley Mr Bmce James Mr Tony Moulds Mrs Dorothy Austen-Smith The State Archive of Westem Australia Mr David Whitford The Esperance Bay HistOIical Society Mrs Olive Tamlin Mr Merv Andre Mr Peter Anderson of Esperance Mr Peter Hudson of Esperance The Augusta HistOIical Society Mr Steve Mm'shall of Augusta The Busselton HistOlical Societv Mrs Elizabeth Nelson Mr Alfred Reynolds of Dunsborough Mr Philip Overton of Busselton Mr Rupert Genitsen The Bunbury Timber Jetty Preservation Society inc. Mrs B. Manea The Bunbury HistOlical Society The Rockingham Historical Society The Geraldton Historical Society Mrs J Trautman Mrs D Benzie Mrs Glenis Thomas Mr Peter W orsley of Gerald ton The Onslow Goods Shed Museum Mr lan Blair Mr Les Butcher Ms Gaye Nay ton The Roebourne Historical Society.
    [Show full text]
  • Pilbara–Gascoyne
    Pilbara–Gascoyne 11 Pilbara–Gascoyne ...................................................... 2 11.5 Surface water and groundwater ....................... 26 11.1 Introduction ........................................................ 2 11.5.1 Rivers ................................................... 26 11.2 Key information .................................................. 3 11.5.2 Flooding ............................................... 26 11.3 Description of the region .................................. 4 11.5.3 Storage systems ................................... 26 11.3.1 Physiographic characteristics.................. 6 11.5.4 Wetlands .............................................. 26 11.3.2 Elevation ................................................. 7 11.5.5 Hydrogeology ....................................... 30 11.3.3 Slopes .................................................... 8 11.5.6 Water table salinity ................................ 30 11.3.4 Soil types ............................................... 9 11.5.7 Groundwater management units ........... 30 11.3.5 Land use ............................................. 11 11.6 Water for cities and towns ............................... 34 11.3.6 Population distribution .......................... 13 11.6.1 Urban centres ....................................... 34 11.3.7 Rainfall zones ....................................... 14 11.6.2 Sources of water supply ....................... 34 11.3.8 Rainfall deficit ....................................... 15 11.6.3 Geraldton ............................................
    [Show full text]
  • R.E. Bush, Gascoyne Explorer and Pastoralist
    R.E. BUSH, GASCOYNE EXPLORER AND PASTORALIST by C.W.M. Cameron , Robert Edwin (most frequently referred to as R.E.) Bush, first interested me whenI wasresearching Frank Wittenoom. They wereofthesame age, andfriends from the time Bush came to Western Australia untiltheyboth diedwithina few months of each other, in 1939. A section in the Wittenoom book represented mostof what I knewof him until by courtesy of hisgranddaughter, Miss Tessa Bush, I received a copyofsome early journals, written to his family. Thejourneys described were at the start of his Western Australian life, a start fromwhichhe became a prosperous pastoralist and a public citizen and thenretired to England to bea countrygentleman, keeping up the tradition hisancestors hadmaintained in Gloucestershire for 400 years. Robert Bush wasbornin 1855 anddiedin 1939, having made his last of thirteen trips to W.A. in 1938. There are therefore a few who wouldremember hislater visits to W.A., but nonehis arrival in 1877. What no doubt attracted the young man of twenty-two to try his luck in W.A. was that his father, Lt. Col. Robert Bush. was in charge ofthe96thInfantry guarding theyoung Swan River settlement in the 1840s, returning to Bristol in 1851. At the age of ten young Robert Edwin went as a day boy to the new public school, Clifton College, at Bristol. There his chiefclaim to remembrance seems to havebeen that he was Captain of the school cricket and later played for Gloucestershire from 1874-7 in the time of the famous Grace brothers. This had its own results for W.A. Bush had a boarder friend at Clifton, Thomas Souther Lodge.
    [Show full text]
  • Distribution, Diet and Potential Ecological Impacts of the Introduced Mozambique Mouthbrooder Oreochromis Mossambicus Peters (Pisces: Cichlidae) in Western Australia
    Journal of the Royal Society of Western Australia, 90: 203–214, 2007 Distribution, diet and potential ecological impacts of the introduced Mozambique mouthbrooder Oreochromis mossambicus Peters (Pisces: Cichlidae) in Western Australia M G Maddern1, D L Morgan&HSGill Centre for Fish & Fisheries Research, School of Biological Sciences and Biotechnology, Murdoch University, WA, 6150, Australia 1Current address: School of Animal Biology (M092), Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Sciences, The University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, Western Australia, 6009, Australia [email protected] Manuscript received June 2007; accepted December 2007 Abstract Oreochromis mossambicus is a highly successful invader of aquatic ecosystems due to its adaptable life history, trophic flexibility, ability to tolerate extreme and often unfavourable environmental conditions and maternal care of offspring. Upon introduction to areas outside of its natural range, these characteristics often give O. mossambicus a competitive advantage over indigenous fishes. Accordingly, O. mossambicus may have deleterious impacts on aquatic communities. Since nonindigenous O. mossambicus populations were first observed in Western Australia in the Gascoyne/Lyons River system (ca 25°S) in 1981, the species has spread north to the Lyndon and Minilya Rivers (ca 23°S), and south to the Chapman River (ca 28°S). There is a high probability of further range expansions of this cichlid in Western Australia due to natural dispersal and human-mediated translocation. Adult and juvenile O. mossambicus consumed primarily detritus and vegetal matter, though juveniles collected from the Gascoyne River were carnivorous. There was no demonstrable dietary overlap between O. mossambicus and the carnivorous and omnivorous sympatric species in the Chapman and Gascoyne Rivers.
    [Show full text]
  • Flood Watch Areas
    ! Daly Sir Graham Pine Moore River Flood Watch Area No. Flood Watch Area No. ! Creek Island ! Ashburton River 12 Middle Onslow Coast 9 Osborne Flood Watch Areas Bigge Island Avon River 24 Pilbara Coastal Rivers 7 ! Kalumburu Island Ka!therine ! Western Australia Blackwood River 30 Preston River 29 Bamyili ! Busselton Coastal Rivers 31 Coronation Adolphus Salt Lakes District Rivers 20 Island Island Collie River 28 Augustus 1 Sandy Desert 10 Island De Grey River 8 ! Wyndham South Coastal Rivers 32 East Kimberley Rivers 2 ! South West District Rivers 33 Koolan Kununurra Fitzroy River 4 Island Sturt Creek District 5 Fortescue River 11 2 NT Swan River 25 Dunmarra Gascoyne River 15 3 ! ! Tanami Desert 6 Mount Greenough River 19 Barnett ! Warburton District Rivers 18 Warmun ! (Turkey Kalkarindji Harvey River 27 Derby ! Elliott West Kimberley Rivers 3 3 Creek) ! Lyndon-Minilya Rivers 13 Broome Western Desert 14 ! Looma Halls Moore and Hill Rivers 22 ! Fitzroy Renner 4 Creek Wooramel River 16 Bidyadanga Crossing ! ! Lajamanu Springs Murchison River 17 ! ! I n d i a n Community Murray River 26 Yarra Yarra Lakes District 21 (Lagrange) ! Larrawa ! O c e a n North Kimberley Rivers 1 Nullarbor District Rivers 23 ! Warrego 5 ! ! Sandfire Balgo Tennant Port Hill Creek ! Pardoo ! Hedland ! Barrow Island ! Karratha 6 Dampier ! ! ! Whim Creek Marble Roebourne Bar ! 7 Telfer ! Onslow 8 ! ! Pannawonica Exmouth ! 10 9 Munjina ! Gorge Cotton Yuendumu Nanutarra ! ! Creek ! ! Tom Coral ! ! Price 11 ! Lyndon Papunya Bay ! ! ! Newman ! Paraburdoo Alice 12 Springs
    [Show full text]
  • ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES of the GASCOYNE-ASHBURTON REGION Peter Austin 1
    ABORIGINAL LANGUAGES OF THE GASCOYNE-ASHBURTON REGION Peter Austin 1. INTRODUCTION1 This paper is a description of the language situation in the region between the Gascoyne and Ashburton Rivers in the north-west of Western Australia. At the time of first white settlement in the region, there were eleven languages spoken between the two rivers, several of them in a number of dialect forms. Research on languages of the locality has taken place mainly in the past thirty years, after a long period of neglect, but details of the past and present linguistic situation have been emerging as a result of that research. The paper includes an annotated bibliography of the Aboriginal languages traditionally spoken in the area 2. HISTORICAL BACKGROUND The first explorations by Europeans in the north-west of Western Australia were maritime voyages concerned with coastal exploration. As early as 1818, Captain P.P. King had reported on the coast east of Exmouth Gulf and between 1838 and 1841 Captains Wickham and Stokes had discovered the mouth of the Ashburton River (Webb & Webb 1983:12). On 5th March 1839 Lieutenant George Grey came upon the mouth of the Gascoyne River and during his explorations encountered Aborigines. He reported that (Brown 1972:83): “they spoke a dialect very closely resembling that of the natives of the Swan River”. Further contact between Gascoyne-Ashburton language speakers and Europeans came in the 1850’s with inland explorations. In 1858 Francis Gregory explored the Gascoyne River and the Lyons River north as far as Mount Augustus (Green 1981:97-8, Webb & Webb 1983:11, Brown 1972:86).
    [Show full text]
  • Recreational Use Management Plan
    Recreational Use Management Plan Iron Ore Mine and Downstream Processing, Cape Preston, Western Australia Mineralogy Pty Ltd October 2006 Recreational Use Management Plan Prepared for Mineralogy Pty Ltd Prepared by Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd Level 1, 629 Newcastle Street, PO Box 81, Leederville 6902, Western Australia T +61 8 9281 6100 F +61 8 9281 6295 www.maunsell.com ABN 20 093 846 925 October 2006 74300904.06 © Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd 2006 The information contained in this document produced by Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd is solely for the use of the Client identified on the cover sheet for the purpose for which it has been prepared and Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd undertakes no duty to or accepts any responsibility to any third party who may rely upon this document. All rights reserved. No section or element of this document may be removed from this document, reproduced, electronically stored or transmitted in any form without the written permission of Maunsell Australia Pty Ltd. Recreational Use Management Plan G:\74300904.06\doc\rep\2006_10_Recreational Use MP_Maunsell.doc Revision I October 2006 Quality Information Document Recreational Use Management Plan Ref 74300904.06 Date October 2006 Prepared by Jamie Shaw Reviewed by Stephen Clark Revision History Authorised Revision Revision Details Date Name/Position Signature Stephen Clark Senior Principle I 24/10/06 Final Environmental Engineer Recreational Use Management Plan G:\74300904.06\doc\rep\2006_10_Recreational Use MP_Maunsell.doc Revision I October 2006 Table of Contents 1.0
    [Show full text]
  • The Importance of Western Australia's Waterways
    The Importance of Western Australia's Waterways There are 208 major waterways in Western Australia with a combined length of more than 25000 km. Forty-eight have been identified as 'wild rivers' due to their near pristine condition. Waterways and their fringing vegetation have important ecological, economic and cultural values. They provide habitat for birds, frogs, reptiles, native fish and macroinvertebrates and form important wildlife corridors between patches of remnant bush. Estuaries, where river and ocean waters mix, connect the land to the sea and have their own unique array of aquatic and terrestrial flora and fauna. Waterways, and water, have important spiritual and cultural significance for Aboriginal people. Many waterbodies such as rivers, soaks, springs, rock holes and billabongs have Aboriginal sites associated with them. Waterways became a focal point for explorers and settlers with many of the State’s towns located near them. Waterways supply us with food and drinking water, irrigation for agriculture and water for aquaculture and horticulture. They are valuable assets for tourism and An impacted south-west river section - salinisation and erosion on the upper Frankland River. Photo are prized recreational areas. S. Neville ECOTONES. Many are internationally recognised and protected for their ecological values, such as breeding grounds and migration stopovers for birds. WA has several Ramsar sites including lakes Gore and Warden on the south coast, the Ord River floodplain in the Kimberley and the Peel Harvey Estuarine system, which is the largest Ramsar site in the south west of WA. Some waterways are protected within national parks for their ecosystem values and beauty.
    [Show full text]
  • Assessing the 2021 Gascoyne River Flood at Carnarvon Preliminary Report
    Government of Western Australia Department of Water and Environmental Regulation Assessing the 2021 Gascoyne River flood at Carnarvon Preliminary report June 2021 Assessing the 2021 Gascoyne River flood at Carnarvon Preliminary report Department of Water and Environmental Regulation June 2021 Department of Water and Environmental Regulation Prime House, 8 Davidson Terrace Joondalup Western Australia 6027 Locked Bag 10 Joondalup DC WA 6919 Phone: 08 6364 7000 Fax: 08 6364 7001 National Relay Service 13 36 77 dwer.wa.gov.au © Government of Western Australia June 2021 FIRST 115932 This work is copyright. You may download, display, print and reproduce this material in unaltered form only (retaining this notice) for your personal, non-commercial use or use within your organisation. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the Department of Water and Environmental Regulation. Acknowledgements This report was prepared by Simon Rodgers, Lauren Greening, Andrew Watson with assistance from staff in the Mid-West Gascoyne region. Contact information For more information about this report, please contact: Simon Rodgers Supervising Engineer, Flood Risk Science (08) 6364 6923 [email protected] Assessing the 2021 Gascoyne River flood at Carnarvon Contents Summary ................................................................................................................... vii 1 Background ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • A Report on the Gascoyne River Catchment Following the 2010/11 Flood Events
    Research Library Resource management technical reports Natural resources research 5-2012 A report on the Gascoyne River catchment following the 2010/11 flood ve ents P A. Waddell P W.E Thomas Paul A. Findlater Follow this and additional works at: https://researchlibrary.agric.wa.gov.au/rmtr Part of the Agriculture Commons, Hydrology Commons, Natural Resources Management and Policy Commons, Soil Science Commons, and the Water Resource Management Commons Recommended Citation Waddell, P A, Thomas, P W, and Findlater, P A. (2012), A report on the Gascoyne River catchment following the 2010/11 flood events. Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western Australia, Perth. Report 382. This report is brought to you for free and open access by the Natural resources research at Research Library. It has been accepted for inclusion in Resource management technical reports by an authorized administrator of Research Library. For more information, please contact [email protected]. A report on the Gascoyne River catchment following the 2010/11 flood events RESOURCE MANAGEMENT TECHNICAL REPORT 382 ISSN 1039-7205 Resource Management Technical Report 382 A report on the Gascoyne River catchment following the 2010/11 flood events PA Waddell, PWE Thomas and PA Findlater May 2012 Cover picture: Gascoyne River mouth sediment plume – 10.00 am, 22 December 2010. Image processed and enhanced by Landgate, Satellite Remote Sensing Services; Erosion cell. Photo: P Waddell; Flooding through Carnarvon horticultural district. Source: Unknown. Disclaimer While all reasonable care has been taken in the preparation of the information in this document, the Chief Executive Officer of the Department of Agriculture and Food and its officers and the State of Western Australia accept no responsibility for any errors or omissions it may contain, whether caused by negligence or otherwise, or for any loss, however caused, arising from reliance on, or the use or release of, this information or any part of it.
    [Show full text]
  • Dirk Hartog Island Return to 1616
    Dirk Hartog Island Return to 1616 In October 2016, the Dirk Hartog Island National Park Sheep were declared eradicated in June 2016 and no Ecological Restoration Project, Return to 1616, is on goats, other than collared Judas goats, were found track to achieve its aim of eradicating feral animals during aerial goat monitoring programs in February and begin returning native animals after mid-2018. and June 2016. Nor have any un-collared goats been caught on automated cameras at water points this Ten species of small mammals and a bird species year. that once occurred on the island will be reintroduced over 12 years, beginning in 2018: the western barred It is likely that the 14 remaining Judas goats are the bandicoot, boodie, Shark Bay mouse, greater stick- only goats left on the island. They will be removed nest rat, western thick-billed grasswren, woylie, if no further goats are found during the next two heath mouse, desert mouse, mulgara, dibbler and aerial monitoring operations in November 2016 and chuditch. Two additional mammal species that may February 2017. There will be several follow up aerial have previously inhabited Dirk Hartog Island will also monitoring programs after removal of the Judas be brought there to help their species survive - the goats, and automated cameras will continue to be rufous hare-wallaby and banded hare-wallaby. monitored until eradication is declared. Restoration of Dirk Hartog Island’s ecology was There now appear to be no cats south of the cat- underway before the Return to 1616 project officially proof fence, and little cat sign north of the fence since began in 2012.
    [Show full text]
  • Shark Bay Bandicoot Management (Preliminary Report Subject to Further Sensitivity Testing)
    Shark Bay Bandicoot Management (Preliminary report subject to further sensitivity testing) Population modelling for optimising strategies for the Shark Bay bandicoot translocation program phase 1 – Dirk Hartog Island and Mt. Gibson July 2019 Biodiversity and Conservation Science Recommendations Based on our Population Viability Analysis (PVA) models it appears that Shark Bay bandicoots (SBB, formerly western barred bandicoots) are well suited for a translocation program. Our modelling predicts that survival probabilities are relatively high for all source populations unless survival and reproduction is reduced by, for example, an environmental stochastic event on average once every 5 years. In the absence of any further supplementation, long-term (50 years) predicted survival probabilities of both Dirk Hartog Island and Mt. Gibson populations fall below that of their source populations. This is likely driven by smaller populations in our models not surviving environmental stochasticity. Although SBBs are well adapted to surviving harsh environmental conditions, we recommend ongoing monitoring of translocated populations. Reinforcement from source populations, along with other mitigation measures, may improve survival probabilities. The final report will provide recommendations regarding optimal supplementation strategies given realistic logistical constraints. The final report will also recommend the smallest translocated population size required to maximise the probability of long-term survival of all translocated populations. In the models, population growth is restricted by a stochastic environmental event that reduces survival to 35% and reproduction by 80% occurring at a frequency of 1 in 5 years compared to a frequency of 1 in 10 years. Of the source populations, Faure Island shows greatest sensitivity to the greater frequency, which is likely driven by the bottleneck through Heirisson Prong and compounded by its smaller population size.
    [Show full text]