Pca-Firearms-Report-2003.Pdf

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Pca-Firearms-Report-2003.Pdf Police Complaints Authority Review of shootings by police in England and Wales from 1998 to 2001 THORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY Y REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW ICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW THORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW CE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS CE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY NTS AUTHORITY REVIEWPOLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY RE HORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW CE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW E COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AU HORITY REVIEW E COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS E COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW TS AUTHORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY ORITY REVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS AUTHORITY REVIEW EVIEW POLICE COMPLAINTS Police Complaints Authority Review of shootings by police in England and Wales from 1998 to 2001 Report to the Secretary of State for the Home Department by the Police Complaints Authority pursuant to S. 79(1) of the Police Act 1996 Ordered by The House of Commons to be printed 30 January 2003 HC.313 Sir, I have the honour to submit to you, in accordance with Section 79(1) of the Police Act 1996, a report requested by the Secretary of State into shootings by police in England and Wales from 1998 to 2001. I am, Sir Your obedient servant Sir Alistair Graham Chairman, Police Complaints Authority The Rt Hon David Blunkett, MP Secretary of State for the Home Department Preface This review was prepared by Alan Bailey1 (External Consultant to the PCA on the police use of firearms), Dr David Best (Head of Research at the PCA) and the two Deputy Chairmen of the PCA, Ian Bynoe and Wendy Towers. The constitution of the group was selected to ensure that expertise and experience in police use of firearms was combined with research expertise and with the managerial and policy perspective of the PCA membership. Additional input on individual cases and matters of technical expertise were obtained as required in the process of conducting the review. The authors would like to thank all those who contributed to the review by participating in interviews, providing written submissions, reviewing and editing earlier drafts of the report and by providing expert input around particular issues that arose during its preparation. Our thanks must also go to Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Constabulary, the Association of Chief Police Officers and Professor Geoffrey Alpert, University of South Carolina, for commenting on a number of drafts of the report. The review has used the available evidence to identify key issues for the police service from both individual cases and from a synthesis of the 24 cases included in the review. The methods have been mutually generative in that the questions addressed using statistical analyses have been based on simple data frequencies and the questions elicited from the expert analysis of cases. Although the methods are statistically sound, they are based on restricted data, and we see this work as the first stage in developing a comprehensive picture – a picture which will require, as we have recommended, a commitment to data collection and analysis from the police forces to this work. In particular, it is critical that firearms units collate more satisfactory information on incidents in which shots are not fired as a comparison group for contextualising the data collated in the review. The conclusions reached are extremely positive and would indicate that firearms units in England and Wales are highly professional. On the other hand, for lessons to be learned in a police service that is critical and reflective, it is essential that the review process is ongoing and based on sound empirical foundations. The recommendations from the Burrows review have not been implemented according to systematic criteria across forces and it is this process of review, revision and evaluation that is at the heart of the recommendations made in the current report. 1 Alan Bailey was a police officer for 30 years. During this time, he performed the roles of Authorised Firearms Officer, Tactical Advisor and Silver Firearms Commander. From 1998 until 2001 he was Head of the National Operations Faculty at Bramshill Police Staff College. He holds academic degrees in the management of firearms operations and has given expert witness evidence on firearms practice in criminal trials. Police Complaints Authority 1 Contents Preface 1 List of Tables 4 Glossary 5 Executive summary 6 Chapter One: Introduction 12 Chapter Two: Aims, rationale and method 20 Chapter Three: Family and key informant interviews 24 Chapter Four: Summaries of the cases included in the review 29 Chapter Five: Quantitative analysis of the 24 cases included in the review 56 Chapter Six: Learning the lessons 69 A. Management of the incident 73 B. Characteristics of the individuals shot 98 C. Post-incident issues 101 Chapter Seven: Conclusion 114 References 115 Appendix 1: Review recommendations 117 Appendix 2: Standardised pro forma used for analysis of PCA case files 124 Police Complaints Authority 3 List of tables Table 1: Classification of incidents in the Burrows Report 13 Table 2: Relationship between deployments, operations and police discharge of weapons between 1997 and 2001 21 Table 3: Summary of the cases involved in the review 58 Table 4: Possible explanatory factors in each of the 20 cases for which reports were available 59 Table 5: Analysis of shootings within the review classified as ‘rational’ 61 Table 6: Analysis of shootings within the review classified as ‘irrational’ 62 Table 7: Summary of the criminal and disciplinary proceedings and inquest verdicts from each of the review cases 67 Table 8: Number of incidents and number of authorised firearms officers in England and Wales, and in the MPS, 1997–2001 (Source – HMIC) 71 Table 9: Rates of shootings as a function of relevant demographic factors comparing the MPS and other forces in England and Wales 87 Table 10: Police shootings per 1,000 firearms operations in the MPS and other metropolitan forces 88 Table 11: Dates for the key events in the 20 cases in the review for which the investigation had been completed 102 4 Police Complaints Authority Glossary ACC Assistant Chief Constable ACPO Association of Chief Police Officers APA Association of Police Authorities ARV Armed Response Vehicle CPS Crown Prosecution Service ECHR European Convention on Human Rights ECtHR European Court of Human Rights FLO Family Liaison Officer HMIC Her Majesty’s Inspectors of Constabulary HRA Human Rights Act 1998 IO Investigating Officer IPCC Independent Police Complaints Commission MPS Metropolitan Police Service NGO Non Governmental Organisation NLEMF National Law Enforcement Memorial Fund PCA Police Complaints Authority PCCG Police Community Consultative Group PNC Police National Computer Principal officers Those officers who have fired or whose actions have altered the course of events at the scene of the shooting incident PSDB Police Scientific Development Branch PTSD Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder SIO Senior Investigating Officer SO19 Metropolitan Police Service Tactical Firearms Department Police Complaints Authority 5 Executive summary Background and Method This review was commissioned by the Rt Hon. John Denham MP, Minister of State at the Home Office under Section 79(1) of The Police Act 1996, with terms of reference requiring a review of: • The planning, control and conduct of operations; • The way in which the concerns of the bereaved families were addressed, and how they were kept informed of the progress of the investigation; and • The training and skill needs of the police officers involved in such operations, particularly at command level. The report follows a previous (unpublished) report examining the discharge of firearms by police between 1991 and 1993, known as the “Burrows Report” (ACPO in consultation with the PCA), which reviewed a total of 23 incidents referred to the PCA (eight of which were fatal). Seven of the incidents resulted from robberies, nine from domestic disputes and seven from ‘other incidents’, which did not lend to a natural classification. In three of the robberies, at least two of the domestic incidents and at least one of the other incidents, shots were fired by the suspect. Burrows concluded that the number of instances that could be regarded as ‘suicides by cop’ and the prevalence of alcohol, drugs and mental health factors among those shot were major concerns for the police. The more recent policy context for the review is the ACPO Manual of Guidance on Police Use of Firearms (January 2001), which takes into account Article 2 of the ECHR. This states that: “everyone’s right to life shall be protected by law”. Section 2.1 of the Manual provides that: “In deciding whether the action was ‘necessary in a democratic society’ it will be necessary to consider whether the action: a. fulfilled a pressing social need, and b. pursued a legitimate aim, and c. there was a reasonable relationship of proportionality between the means employed and the aim pursued.” 6 Police Complaints Authority The current review spans the period before and immediately after the introduction of the Act and seeks to address the broader question of what lessons have been learned, both since the Burrows Report and across the period under review. The review will outline each of the 24 firearms incidents, 11 fatal, referred to the PCA for supervision and accepted by the Authority between January 1998 and November 2001 in an attempt to address this question and those posed by the terms of reference outlined above. The methodology employed involved a combination of documentary analysis of the PCA case files supplemented by expert analysis, key informant interviews and information from some of the families of the 11 individuals who died as a result of the police shootings during this period. Results The forces involved in the cases were: • Metropolitan Police Service (11 cases); • Merseyside (3 cases); • Devon and Cornwall (2 cases); and • West Yorkshire, Bedfordshire, Surrey, Gwent, West Midlands, West Mercia, Derbyshire, Sussex (1 case each).
Recommended publications
  • Agenda Document for Sussex Police and Crime Panel, 05/10/2018 10:30
    Public Document Pack Sussex Police and Crime Panel Members are hereby requested to attend the meeting of the Sussex Police and Crime Panel, to be held at 10.30 am on Friday, 5 October 2018 at County Hall, Lewes. Tony Kershaw Clerk to the Police and Crime Panel 27 September 2018 Webcasting Notice Please note: This meeting will be filmed for live or subsequent broadcast via East Sussex County Council’s website on the internet – at the start of the meeting the Chairman will confirm that the meeting is to be filmed. Generally the public gallery is not filmed. However, by entering the meeting room and using the public seating area you are consenting to being filmed and to the possible use of those images and sound recordings for webcasting and/or training purposes. The webcast will be available via the link below: http://www.eastsussex.public-i.tv/core/. Agenda 10.30 am 1. Declarations of Interest Members and officers must declare any pecuniary or personal interest in any business on the agenda. They should also make declarations at any stage such an interest becomes apparent during the meeting. Consideration should be given to leaving the meeting if the nature of the interest warrants it. If in doubt contact Democratic Services, West Sussex County Council, before the meeting. 10.35 am 2. Minutes (Pages 5 - 16) To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting on 29 June (cream paper). 10.40 am 3. Urgent Matters Items not on the agenda which the Chairman of the meeting is of the opinion should be considered as a matter of urgency.
    [Show full text]
  • Greater Manchester Police
    WEST MIDLANDS POLICE JOB DESCRIPTION POST TITLE: Chief Firearms Instructor Band E LPU/DEPARTMENT: Operations Firearms Unit RESPONSIBLE TO: Chief Superintendent Operations Department RESPONSIBLE FOR: Sergeant, Constable and Police Staff Firearms Instructors; Business Support Manager; Armourer. AIM OF JOB: Management of the Firearms Training Unit in WMP. Management of training for all AFOs & Firearms Commanders VETTING LEVEL: SC level MAIN DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES MANAGING STAFF ▪ Manage and develop staff within the unit. ▪ Manage Policy Compliance Unit. ▪ Maintain an awareness of staff welfare needs. ▪ Monitor the supervision of officers and police staff receiving training. ▪ Monitor the delivery of training. ▪ Manage staff performance ,ensuring that annual and interim meetings take place and objectives are agreed and actioned. ▪ Identify strengths, weaknesses and training needs. ▪ Implement and monitor the West Midlands Police Equal Opportunities Policy with regard to managing staff and provision of services. 1 | P a g e Version 1.2 April 2015 ADMINISTRATION ▪ To oversee the collation and production of performance and statistical returns. ▪ To be responsible for the management of devolved budgets. ▪ To represent the force at local, regional and national conferences where applicable to the post holder ▪ To provide reports and comprehensive working papers including making recommendations for improvements or amendments to systems within the department. ▪ Plan and prepare annual Firearms Training plan. ▪ Ensure compliance with College of Policing Firearms Training Licensing requirements and submission of annual Quality Assurance Management Systems documentation. ▪ Evaluate all firearms refresher training. Signing of all Risk Assessments. ▪ Evaluate all firearm training - new learning ▪ Process paper work and maintain records of training given utilising computer data base system JML Chronicle.
    [Show full text]
  • Taser EQIA Appendix 4
    APPENDIX FOUR GLOSSARY OF TERMS ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ACPO - Association of Chief Police Officers AEP: Attenuating Energy Projectile AFO - Authorised Firearms Officer: An Authorised Firearms Officer (AFO) is a police officer attached to Special Operations Branch or an Armed Response Vehicle (ARV) Unit who has been selected and trained in the use of firearms in policing operations. The officer will have reached the required level of competency in weapon handling, tactical knowledge, shooting skills and judgement as required by the Chief Constable. An authorised firearms officer will undergo an intensive 11- week training programme, which covers the following; Specialist unarmed close quarter combat Advanced Firearms ARV Interception tactics Advanced Driving Course Tactical Pursuit Driving Bronze Commander First Aid Training (this includes training in a defibrillator which is carried in the Armed Response Vehicle) ARV - Armed Response Vehicle An Armed Response Vehicle (ARV) is the terminology used for a patrol car which is used by authorised firearms officers to respond to a spontaneous firearms incident. BRC – Belfast Regional Control Bronze Commander- A Bronze commander is a police officer who has been trained as a bronze commander and who, at the scene of a firearms incident, is responsible for the implementation of the Silver Commander’s plan by the use of appropriate tactics within a geographical or functional area of responsibility CAJ - Committee on the Administration of Justice CAT - Committee Against Torture Gold, Silver and Bronze Command Structure An effective command structure has three levels, Strategic, Tactical and Operational. These command functions are commonly referred to as Gold, Silver and Bronze respectively.
    [Show full text]
  • Officer and Staff Safety Review
    Officer and Staff Safety Review A review of the arrangements to secure the safety of police officers and police staff engaged in frontline policing Contributors Workstream leads and chapter authors Published by the National Police Chiefs’ Inspector Kio Bozorgi – Officer and staff Council and the College of Policing safety threat analysis Chief Superintendent Ian Drummond- Steering group Smith – Officer and staff safety Lead: Chief Constable Charlie Hall – equipment Hertfordshire Inspector Andy Harding – Taser and less Chair: Chief Constable Alan Pughsley – lethal weapons Kent Inspector Nick Sutcliffe and Inspector Chief Constable Giles York – Sussex Bruce Collett – Personal safety training Chief Constable Andy Rhodes – Inspector James Turner and Samuel Lancashire Slater – Criminal justice process Chief Constable Andy Marsh – Avon and Chief Inspector Zoe Mainey – Welfare Somerset support for officers and staff Deputy Chief Constable Bernie O’Reilly – Dr Paul Quinton and Dr Oliver Clark- College of Policing Darby – Existing evidence base Rachel Tuffin – College of Policing Acknowledgements Project team We wish to put on record our sincere Project lead: Superintendent Amanda appreciation and thanks to all police Tillotson – Kent forces who provided data to this project, Deputy project lead and report lead and to the following who gave advice author: Dr William Keating-Jones – and support: Sussex Prof Ben Bradford, Dr Joan Donnelly, Matt Johnston, Dr Arabella Kyprianides, Chief Inspector Melita Worswick, Dr Scott Wolfe, Thomas Wright and Dr Julia Yesberg. © College of Policing Limited (2020) All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, modified, amended, stored in any retrieval system or transmitted, in any form or by any means, without the prior written permission of the College or as expressly permitted by law.
    [Show full text]
  • Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 66 February 23, 2021 Opus 2
    Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 66 February 23, 2021 Opus 2 - Official Court Reporters Phone: +44 (0)20 3008 5900 Email: [email protected] Website: https://www.opus2.com February 23, 2021 Manchester Arena Inquiry Day 66 1 Tuesday, 23 February 2021 1 the coming into effect of that plan in July 2012? 2 (10.15 am) 2 A. I was, yes. 3 MR GREANEY: Sir, good morning. I’m sorry we are starting 3 Q. Still dealing with matters of background, in 2012 when 4 a few minutes later than even the delayed start today; 4 you joined the unit, how many inspectors were there 5 there was a good reason for that. The gentleman in the 5 in the firearms unit? 6 witness box is someone that we heard a good deal about 6 A. There were eight in total , sir . 7 yesterday, it ’s Inspector Simon Lear, and I will ask 7 Q. Sir, for your information, I ’m in the first statement of 8 that he be sworn by Andrew, please. 8 Inspector Lear at paragraph 2. 9 INSPECTOR SIMON LEAR (sworn) 9 So there were eight inspectors? 10 Questions from MR GREANEY 10 A. Yes. 11 MR GREANEY: Would you begin, please, by telling us what 11 Q. Over time, was there any impact upon the number of 12 your full name is? 12 inspectors within the unit? 13 A. Simon Andrew Lear. 13 A. Over the next couple of years, sir , it went down from 14 Q. Are you an inspector with Greater Manchester Police? 14 eight to five and then finished at three.
    [Show full text]
  • Devon and Cornwall Police Guidelines
    NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED DEVON & CORNWALL C O N S T A B U L A R Y Force Policy & Procedure Guideline POLICE USE OF FIREARMS: POLICY AND OPERATIONAL Reference Number D83 Policy Version Date 15 July 2005 Review Date 1 May 2006 Policy Ownership: Crime Department Portfolio Holder: Assistant Chief Constable (O) Links or overlaps with other policies: D73 Negotiators D84 Police Use of Firearms : Training D144 Police Dogs & their use D147 TPAC D241 Post Incident Procedures (Firearms) D242 Use of Handheld Digital Recorders DEVON & CORNWALL CONSTABULARY POLICY & PROCEDURES D83 POLICE USE OF FIREARMS: POLICY AND OPERATIONAL VERSION DATED 15/07/05 1.0 POLICY IDENTIFICATION 1.1 This policy has been drafted in accordance with the principles of Human Rights legislation, Race Relations (Amendment) Act 2000 and Freedom of Information Act 2000. Public disclosure is approved unless where otherwise indicated and justified by relevant exemptions. 15/07/05 Force Publication Scheme NOT PROTECTIVELY MARKED 2.0 POLICY STATEMENTS/INTENTIONS (FOIA – OPEN) 2.1 This guideline outlines the Firearms Strategy for the Devon & Cornwall Constabulary. It sets out how and by whom the strategy will be delivered as well as giving guidance on specific operational circumstances. 3.0 INTRODUCTION (FOIA – OPEN) 3.1 It is the policy of the Devon & Cornwall Constabulary, at all incidents involving the police use of firearms to comply with the guidelines detailed in the ACPO Manual of Guidance on the Police Use of Firearms. 3.2 In keeping with the Manual of Guidance, the underlying principle for the interpretation of this guideline should be the application of common sense, reinforced by teamwork.
    [Show full text]
  • London Bridge Inquests Day 4A July 5, 2019 Opus 2 International
    London Bridge Inquests Day 4A July 5, 2019 Opus 2 International - Official Court Reporters Phone: 0203 008 6619 Email: [email protected] Website: https://www.opus2.com July 5, 2019 London Bridge Inquests Day 4A 1 Friday, 5 July 2019 1 A. That’s correct . 2 (10.21 am) 2 Q. And you appreciate that you are here to give evidence 3 (In the absence of the jury) 3 about what you saw and what you did on the night of 4 MR HOUGH: Sir, before we hear from our witnesses for today, 4 3 June 2017? 5 may I say this : all four of them are subject of 5 A. That’s correct , yes. 6 anonymity and special measures orders. 6 Q. And you made two witness statements and I think you have 7 THE CHIEF CORONER: Yes. 7 copies of them there, and our references for those are 8 MR HOUGH: Which is why access to this room has been 8 {WS0082} and {WS0082A} and if you need to refer to those 9 controlled , and why our first witness is in the same 9 you may do so, and we may bring parts up on the screen 10 position in court as the witnesses were yesterday. 10 and I may refer to them as well. 11 The orders are, in short, that each of these 11 A. Thank you. 12 witnesses will be referred to by their designated 12 Q. You are a constable in the Metropolitan Police Service , 13 pseudonym. While each of them is giving evidence no 13 you have been for eight years; is that right? 14 question may be asked which might lead to their 14 A.
    [Show full text]
  • Connecticut Must Inform Officer Immediately: NO Connecticut CCW Links May Issue (See Must Inform Section)
    Connecticut Must Inform Officer Immediately: NO Connecticut May Issue (See Must Inform Section) CCW Links State CCW Site State Firearm Laws Summary of State Firearm Laws (From OLF 1/31/2020) Instructions to Applicants CT Certified Instructors State Firearm FAQs Hunting Gun Laws FAQs State Statutes State Admin Rules Firearms & CCW Brochure 11/17 Note: Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, Idaho, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, State Attorney General Maine, Montana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Hampshire, Oklahoma, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Vermont, West Virginia and Secretary of State Wyoming have "Permitless Carry". Anyone who can legally possess a firearm may carry in these states without a Permit/License. Check each Age to Carry a Firearm In Other States states page for information on age and other restrictions that may apply. North Dakota has “Permitless Carry” for Residents only. Last Updated: 9/1/2021 Permits/Licenses This State Honors Listed Below Connecticut does not honor any other states Permit/Licenses. Though Connecticut law states “May Issue” Connecticut operates more like a “Shall Issue” state if you meet all the requirements. Connecticut also is “Shall Issue” for Non Residents if you meet the qualifications. Notice: CT just passed very restrictive gun laws. CT residents and anyone planning on carrying in CT should read the Bill. Also read the “Chemical Sprays/Stun Gun/Higher Capacity Magazine Laws” section below. You can read OLR’s Bill Analysis of SB1160 by going Here. How to Apply for a Permit Residents You must go to the Police Department or First Selectman of the town and get the application. Not available online.
    [Show full text]
  • 7. PAM Minutes
    19 July 2019 PERFORMANCE & ACCOUNTABILITY MEETING DATE: 19 July 2019 LOCATION: Office of the Sussex Police & Crime Commissioner, Sackville House, Lewes PRESENT: Police & Crime Commissioner – Katy Bourne (KB) Chief Executive Officer – Mark Streater (MS) Deputy Chief Constable – Jo Shiner (JS) Assistant Chief Constable – Dave Miller (DM) Communications Manager – Natalie McFall (audio recording) Head of Performance – Graham Kane (retrospective minutes) POLICE OFFICER AND PCSO RECRUITMENT UPDATE Earlier this year, I asked local people to help fund 250 more police officers, 100 more Police Community Support Officers (PCSOs) and 50 more specialist police staff – a total increase of 400 officers and staff compared to last year. A. How is this recruitment progressing? B. What is Sussex Police doing to ensure that serving police officers, staff and PCSOs understand the increases that the Force is working to achieve? JS confirmed that recruitment is progressing “really well” and stated that the Force is “on track” to achieve the additional police officers, PCSOs and specialist staff by March 2023. Sussex Police had an intake of 72 police officers in July 2019 who will be posted to the policing divisions in October for tutoring ahead of them achieving Independent Patrol in January 2020. Further intakes of 24 and 72 are planned in December 2019 and March 2020, respectively. Another 13 individuals have been recruited through the ‘Police Now – National Graduate Leadership Programme’ and will be in Force from early September 2019. The Deputy Chief Constable reflected positively on the most recent police officer recruitment campaign that opened in June 2019. A total of 1,073 applications were received from a diverse range of applicants including: more than 40% from female applicants; approximately 10% identifying themselves as bisexual, gay or lesbian and circa 6% of candidates declaring their ethnicity as Black, Asian and Minority Ethnic.
    [Show full text]
  • 310 Firearms
    Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake Law Enforcement Policy Manual Firearms Policy Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake Law Enforcement Policy Manual 310 Firearms 310.1 FIREARMS PURPOSE AND SCOPE This policy provides guidelines for Department-approved firearms, the safe and legal carrying of firearms, firearms maintenance, and firearms training. This policy does not apply to issues related to the use of firearms that are addressed in the Use of Force or Officer-Involved Shootings and Deaths policies. This policy only applies to those members who are authorized to carry firearms. 310.2 FIREARMS POLICY The Unified Police Department of Greater Salt Lake (UPD) will equip its members with firearms to address the risks posed to the public and department members by violent and sometimes well- armed persons. The Department will ensure firearms are appropriate and in good working order and that relevant training is provided. 310.3 ON-DUTY FIREARMS Officers shall be armed at all times with an approved primary duty pistol while on duty, except: A. When entering a jail, prison, or other secure building or area. B. When excused due to the nature of an assignment. C. When excused by the Sheriff or Division Commander/Administrator. 310.4 OFF-DUTY WEAPONS AVAILABILITY Full Time off-duty officers will always have an authorized firearm readily available. However, an off-duty officer may be in many situations when the carrying of a firearm is impractical, imprudent, or impossible. Satisfying the requirement to have a firearm “readily available” will depend upon the situation, activity, and location of the officer.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide on Firearms Licensing Law
    Guide on Firearms Licensing Law October 2014 Contents Ministerial foreword 1. An overview – frequently asked questions on firearms licensing .......................................... 5 2. Definition and classification of firearms and ammunition ...................................................... 8 3. Prohibited weapons and ammunition .................................................................................. 19 4. Expanding ammunition ........................................................................................................ 29 5. Restrictions on the possession, handling and distribution of firearms and ammunition .... 31 6. Exemptions from the requirement to hold a certificate ....................................................... 38 7. Young persons ..................................................................................................................... 49 8. Antique firearms ................................................................................................................... 55 9. Historic handguns ................................................................................................................ 58 10. Firearm certificate procedure ............................................................................................... 71 11. Shotgun certificate procedure ............................................................................................. 85 12. Assessing suitability ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Agenda Document for Sussex Police and Crime Panel, 29/01/2021 10:30
    Public Document Pack Sussex Police and Crime Panel Members are hereby requested to attend a virtual meeting of the Sussex Police and Crime Panel to be held at 10.30 am on Friday, 29 January 2021. Note: In accordance with regulations in response to the current public health emergency, this meeting will be held virtually with members in remote attendance. Public access is via webcasting. The meeting will be available to watch live via the Internet at this address: http://www.eastsussex.public-i.tv/core/ Tony Kershaw Clerk to the Police and Crime Panel 21 January 2021 Agenda 10.30 am 1. Declarations of Interest (Pages 5 - 6) Declarations of interest, in relation to any item, should be made by members at the start of the meeting. If not, members should confirm/re-confirm their interests at the beginning of an item. Interests usually/previously declared are included in the table attached. 10.35 am 2. Minutes of the Previous Meeting (Pages 7 - 20) To confirm the minutes of the previous meeting on 25 September 2020 (cream paper). 10.40 am 3. Urgent Matters Items not on the agenda which the Chairman of the meeting is of the opinion should be considered as a matter of urgency. 10.40 am 4. Public and Panel Questions to the Commissioner and Panel (Pages 21 - 24) Written questions may be submitted by members of the public up to two weeks in advance of a meeting. The Chairman of the Panel or the Commissioner will be invited to provide a response by noon of the day before the meeting.
    [Show full text]