DOCSLIB.ORG

Chapter 1 and 2-Introduction and Literature Review Copy

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Chapter 1 and 2-Introduction and Literature Review Copy SSStttooonnnyyy BBBrrrooooookkk UUUnnniiivvveeerrrsssiiitttyyy The official electronic file of this thesis or dissertation is maintained by the University Libraries on behalf of The Graduate School at Stony Brook University. ©©© AAAllllll RRRiiiggghhhtttsss RRReeessseeerrrvvveeeddd bbbyyy AAAuuuttthhhooorrr... Gender, Power, and Inequality: An Examination of the Causes and Consequences of Queer Intimate Partner Violence A Dissertation Presented by Bethany Marie Coston to The Graduate School in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology Stony Brook University August 2014 ! Stony Brook University The Graduate School Bethany Marie Coston We, the dissertation committee for the above candidate for the Doctor of Philosophy degree, hereby recommend acceptance of this dissertation. Michael Kimmel – Dissertation Advisor Distinguished Professor, Department of Sociology Melissa Forbis – Chairperson of Defense Assistant Professor, Department of Cultural Analysis and Theory Arnout van de Rijt – Associate Professor Department of Sociology Lisa Diedrich – Associate Professor Department of Cultural Analysis and Theory Stony Brook University This dissertation is accepted by the Graduate School Charles Taber Dean of the Graduate School ii! ! ! Abstract Gender, Power, and Inequality: An Examination of the Causes and Consequences of Queer Intimate Partner Violence by Bethany Marie Coston Doctor of Philosophy in Sociology Stony Brook University 2014 Violence is a not a new social phenomenon—at least, in the sense that violence has occurred throughout history between individuals, within communities, and practiced by institutions. But mainstream sociological studies of violence are all too often studies of men’s violence. This project is an attempt to challenge critically the specter of heteronormativity that haunts the theories and praxis of intimate partner violence (IPV). Under this preexisting framework, studies have focused on men’s violence against woman and used patriarchy as an explanation (i.e. the unequal distribution of gendered power, with men benefiting). However, I want to know if gender is still relevant theoretically or practically, particularly in cases where the partners are the same-sex or a woman is abusing a man. I ask, “if not gender, what?” This is the study of violence, queered. Within the project, I challenge the notion that patriarchy is a grand theory for explaining violence in relationships and propose a more nuanced conceptual tool. While men’s power and/or masculinity as power is important, other sources of privilege are, too—for instance, age, race ethnicity, nationality, or socioeconomic status. I use this critical, feminist intersectional frame to examine not only the prevalence of and risk factors for IPV, but also the structural inequalities in the detection and “treatment” of it: the homophobic, gender-normative, and racist healthcare system and the lacking protections for LGBT individuals and people of color; unequal access to affordable healthcare, the resulting negative health outcomes; and the myriad problematic approaches to educating and training agents of bureaucratic agencies on these issues. The hope is that with new insights from this project, there is a place for macro-level intervention (policy language, training of care providers, funding for specialized program and services, and so on). I demand an approach to ending intimate partner violence that is accountable to the interlocking systems of oppression and privilege, aimed at social justice for all people. iii! ! ! Dedication To Liz – without you, I would not have been able to mentally, or literally, finish this project. I am forever grateful to have you with me in this anti-violence, anti-assimilationist fight. To the 61 LGBTQH men and women who we know died at the hands of intimate partner from 2008-2012 – you did not die in vain. We know there are so many more of you. We will do better. iv ! ! v ! ! Table of Contents Signature Page ........................................................................................................... ii Abstract .................................................................................................................... iii Dedication ................................................................................................................ iv Frontispiece ............................................................................................................... v Table of Contents ..................................................................................................... vi List of Figures and Tables ........................................................................................ ix List of Abbreviations ................................................................................................. x Acknowledgements .................................................................................................. xi I. Introduction .......................................................................................................... 1 II. Review of the Literature ...................................................................................... 7 An Argument for a Historical Framework .......................................................... 7 History of Men’s Domestic Violence Against Women .................................... 11 History of Same-Sex Domestic Violence ......................................................... 19 History of Women’s Domestic Violence Against Men .................................... 32 Intimate Partner Violence as a Health Issue ...................................................... 48 Moving Research Forward ................................................................................ 55 Research Objectives .......................................................................................... 56 Contributions of Proposed Research ................................................................ 57 Roadmap for the Project ................................................................................... 58 III. Data & Methods ............................................................................................... 60 Framework ....................................................................................................... 60 Analysis ............................................................................................................ 60 Source of the Data ................................................................................. 60 Sample ................................................................................................... 61 Experience of Violence .......................................................................... 61 Reliability and Validity .................................................................................... 64 Limitations ............................................................................................ 65 IV. Intimate Partner Violence Adult Lifetime Risk Assessment ........................... 70 Research Objectives ....................................................................................... 71 Risk Factors ................................................................................................... 72 vi ! ! Individual Level .................................................................................... 72 Relationship Level ................................................................................ 73 Community Level ................................................................................. 74 Social Level .......................................................................................... 74 Methods ......................................................................................................... 74 Outcome Variables ................................................................................ 75 Predictor Variables ................................................................................ 76 Results ............................................................................................................ 78 Discussion ...................................................................................................... 86 Conclusion ..................................................................................................... 89 Appendix A. Tables ........................................................................................ 91 Appendix B. Model Fit Graphs ...................................................................... 92 V. Expanded Effects of Power and Inequality on Intimate Partner Violence ......... 94 Research Objectives ....................................................................................... 95 Including (but not limited to) Traditional Gender Norms ............................... 95 Methods ......................................................................................................... 98 Dependent Variables ............................................................................. 99 Independent Variables ........................................................................... 99 Control Variables ................................................................................ 100 Results .......................................................................................................... 101 Regression Analysis - Men .........................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Maltreatment in Residential Child Protection Care: a Review of the Literature
    Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience & Mental Health e-ISSN: 2585-2795 • Printed-ISSN: 2654-1432 DOI: 10.26386/obrela.v3i2.171 Maltreatment in residential child protection care: A review of the literature Fotine Konstantopoulou1 and Ioanna Mantziou2 1 Department of Psychiatry, Attikon University Hospital, Athnes, Greece 2 NGO The Smile of the Child, Greece Abstract The current literature review provides a conceptual and empirical framework for understanding child institution- al maltreatment. The challenges and vulnerabilities of children placed in alternative residential care are being ad- dressed. Research findings highlight the adversities children experience within residential care. Evidently, although residential settings are meant to protect and promote the wellbeing of children in danger, they expose them to mul- tiple risks including abusive experiences by peers and staff and eventually fuel the circle of abuse. Malpractices within care institutions include physically, psychologically and sexually abusive or neglectful practices. Non – institutional care is gradually gaining awareness along with the need to revolutionize family-based services. Keywords: Child protection, Residential care, System abuse, Structural Neglect, Deinstitutionalization, Family – based services Special Issue: “Sociocultural understanding of violence”, Quest Editor: Konstantina Sklavou Corresponding Author: Fotine Konstantopoulou, Psychologist M. A. Forensic Psychology, Attikon University Hospital, Department of Psychi- atry, [email protected] ,
    [Show full text]
  • Buchanan, Verity Redacted.Pdf
    City Research Online City, University of London Institutional Repository Citation: Buchanan, V. (2019). Spaces of subjugation, complicity and resistance: negotiating subjectivity, power and agency in the environments and contexts of everyday terror. (Unpublished Doctoral thesis, City, University of London) This is the accepted version of the paper. This version of the publication may differ from the final published version. Permanent repository link: https://openaccess.city.ac.uk/id/eprint/25275/ Link to published version: Copyright: City Research Online aims to make research outputs of City, University of London available to a wider audience. Copyright and Moral Rights remain with the author(s) and/or copyright holders. URLs from City Research Online may be freely distributed and linked to. Reuse: Copies of full items can be used for personal research or study, educational, or not-for-profit purposes without prior permission or charge. Provided that the authors, title and full bibliographic details are credited, a hyperlink and/or URL is given for the original metadata page and the content is not changed in any way. City Research Online: http://openaccess.city.ac.uk/ [email protected] Running head: SITUATED SELVES AND FAMILY ABUSE Relationally situated selves and abuse within the family: An ecological community psychology perspective Verity Buchanan A Portfolio Submitted for the Award of Doctorate in Counselling Psychology (DPsych) City, University of London Department of Psychology November 2019 TABLE OF CONTENTS ACKNOWLEDGMENTS 7 DECLARATION 8 PREFACE 9 REFERENCE LIST 11 PART ONE: QUALITATIVE RESEARCH STUDY 12 ABSTRACT 13 TERMINOLOGY 14 RESEARCH STUDY INTRODUCTION 15 1 CHAPTER ONE – CRITICAL LITERATURE REVIEW 18 1.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Surviving Strucured Abuse in Group Homes
    Victory 1 “All I wanted was someone to be there”: Surviving the Structured Abuse in Group Homes Olivia Victory California State University San Marcos Master of Arts in Sociological Practice May 2016 Thesis Committee: Kristin Bates, Ph.D., Chair Christopher Bickel, Ph.D Marisol Clark-Ibáñez, Ph.D. Victory 2 Table of Contents Section Page Abstract……………………………………………………………………... 3 Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………. 4 Introduction...……………………………………………………………….. 5 Statement of the Problem……………………………………….……………7 Historical Context of Residential Care Facilities……………………………11 Literature Review……………………………………………………………14 The Clinical Master Narrative……….………………………………15 Youth Experiences in Care…………………………………….….....19 Total Institutions……………...………………………………….…..25 Street-Level Bureaucrat………….…………………………………..28 Theory………………………………….…………………………………….33 Erving Goffman’s Total Institutions…………………………………33 Standpoint Theory……………………………………………………35 Methodology…………………………………….……………….…..............38 Reflexivity through Standpoint…….……………….…......................38 Overview of Methods……………………….………………………..39 Participants……………………………………………….…………..41 Procedures………………………………………………………...….42 Ethical Considerations…………………………………………..........44 Findings………………………………………………………………………45 Life Inside Structured Abuse…………..……………………………..45 Effect on Life……………………………………………………...….75 Taking Back Control………………………………………………….87 Transition into Adulthood…………………………………………….98 Conclusion………………………………………………………………..….105 Recommendations……………………………………………………………107 References…………………………………………………………………....111
    [Show full text]
  • Abuse and Femicide of the Older Woman
    Femicide Volume VIII FEMICIDE Volume VIII Abuse and Femicide of the Older Woman 亞太家庭組織 1 OFAP ISBN: 978-3-200-03012-1 Published by the Academic Council on the United Nations System (ACUNS) Vienna Liaison Office Email: [email protected] Web: www.acuns.org /wwwacunsvienna.org © November 2017 Academic Council on the United Nations System (ACUNS) Vienna Liaison Office Eighth Edition Copyright: All rights reserved. The contents of this publication may be freely used and copied for educational and other non- commercial purposes, provided that a reproduction is accompanied by an acknowledgement of the authors of the articles. Managing Editor: Helen Hemblade Publication Team: Markus Gerz, Mila Kirilova, Shira Appelboom, Melanie Kafka, Jasmine Adu-Atwere and Michael Platzer. Layout and design: Shirel Gertan Cover image: Painted by Professor Mitra Shahmoradi This publication was made possible by the generous financial contribution of the Karen E. Burke Foundation and the Organisation of the Families of Asia and the Pacific (OFAP). The Academic Council on the United Nations System (ACUNS) is a non-governmental organisation that stimulates and disseminates research on the United Nations, other international organisations and issues of global governance. ACUNS also promotes dialogue, regional cooperation and cultural exchange between academics, practitioners, civil society and students. The ACUNS Vienna Liaison Office has been active since 2007 and focuses primarily on human rights, equal opportunities for youth, death penalty, juvenile justice, femicide and other issues of concern to UN agencies. The ACUNS Vienna Team would like to express its gratitude to the Permanent Missions of Argentina, Belarus, Canada, Costa Rica, Ecuador, Guatemala, Italy, Nigeria, Norway, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain and Thailand; Thai Institute of Justice; Women Against Violence Europe (WAVE); Soroptomist International; European Cooperation in Science and Technology, Femicide across Europe (COST); Women’s Aid; and the Spanish Civil Society Observatory, feminicidio.net.
    [Show full text]
  • Issues in the Definition of Family Violence and Abuse
    01-Hines.qxd 9/30/2004 5:08 PM Page 1 1 Issues in the Definition of Family Violence and Abuse Women can verbally abuse you. They can rip your clothes off without even touching you, the way women know how to talk, converse. But men . weren’t brought up to talk as much as women do ...So it was a resort to violence, if I couldn’t get through to her by words . On some occasions she was the provoker. It didn’t call for physical abuse . [but] it did call for something. You know, you’re married for that long, if somebody gets antagonistic, you want to defend yourself. (Ptacek, 1998, p. 188) hat are your views on this case? If this man struck his wife when W she antagonized him, has he been abusive? How about his wife? If she verbally attacked him, put him down, tried to antagonize him with her words, was she also guilty of spousal abuse? Is one form of abuse (e.g., phys- ical aggression) more abusive than another form (e.g., verbal aggression)? What is the basis for your judgment? Does abusive behavior by one spouse justify retaliatory aggression? He always wanted to have sex. He was jealous and if he didn’t have sex with me every single day that means that I was with another guy and that was his theory. From the time I was 18, I had sex every single day for the first year we were married . [We] did it every day because he wanted to and I thought I had to.
    [Show full text]
  • Barriers to Building Financial Security for Survivors of Domestic Violence
    Barriers to Building Financial Security for Survivors of Domestic Violence Prepared for The Financial Clinic By Claire Boyce Sara Koliner Lacee Koplin Shuangyi (Issy) Sun Dan Trifone Joann Wong Workshop in Public Affairs Spring 2014 ©2014 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System All rights reserved. For additional copies: Publications Office La Follette School of Public Affairs 1225 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI 53706 www.lafollette.wisc.edu/publications/workshops.html [email protected] The Robert M. La Follette School of Public Affairs is a teaching and research department of the University of Wisconsin–Madison. The school takes no stand on policy issues; opinions expressed in these pages reflect the views of the authors. Table of Contents List of Figures .......................................................................................................... v Foreword ............................................................................................................... vi Acknowledgments ................................................................................................. vii Executive Summary .............................................................................................. viii Barriers to Financial Accounts .......................................................................................... viii Policy and Program Opportunities ................................................................................. viii Next Steps for the Financial Clinic ....................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • The Journal of Adult Protection
    The Journal of Adult Protection The Journal of Adult Protection Structural Discrimination and Abuse: COVID-19 and people in care homes in England and Wales Journal: The Journal of Adult Protection Manuscript ID JAP-12-2020-0050.R2 Manuscript Type: Research Paper elder abuse, COVID-19, Care homes, ageism, discrmination, structural Keywords: abuse Page 1 of 24 The Journal of Adult Protection 1 2 3 4 5 Structural Discrimination and Abuse: COVID-19 and people in care homes in 6 7 England and Wales 8 9 10 Jonathan Parker 11 The Journal of Adult Protection 12 13 14 15 16 17 Purpose 18 19 The purpose of this paper is to explore the significant and high death toll of COVID- 20 21 19 on care home residents and social care staff in England and Wales. These mortality 22 23 figures, alongside differential treatment of residents and staff during the pandemic, 24 25 are conceptualised as a form of structural abuse. Arguments are made for the 26 inclusion of structural abuse as a separate category of elder abuse. 27 28 29 Design/methodology/approach 30 31 32 This paper is predominantly conceptual but it also draws on available secondary data, 33 34 such as mortality statistics, media reports, and developing research. 35 36 37 Findings 38 39 40 The lack of appropriate personal protective equipment (PPE), paucity of guidance and 41 high mortality rate amongst care home staff and residents during the pandemic is 42 43 indicative of social discourses that, when underpinned by ageism, reflect structural 44 45 elder abuse.
    [Show full text]
  • Intersectionality, Power Relations and Abuse of Women with Physical Disabilities
    ØF-notat nr. 06/2010 Intersectionality, Power relations and Abuse of Women with Physical Disabilities Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Violence, Abuse and Trauma, San Diego, September 15-17 2008 av Vigdis Mathisen Olsvik ØF-notat nr. 06/2010 Intersectionality, Power relations and Abuse of Women with Physical Disabilities Paper presented at the 13th International Conference on Violence, Abuse and Trauma, San Diego, September 15-17 2008 av Vigdis Mathisen Olsvik Tittel: Intersectionality, Power relations and Abuse of Women with Physical Disabilities Forfattere: Olsvik, Vigdis Mathisen ØF-notat nr.: 06/2010 ISSN nr.: 0808-4653 Prosjektnummer: Prosjektnavn: Violence and Abuse against Women with Physical Disabilities Oppdragsgiver: The Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation and the Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies Prosjektleder: Olsvik, Vigdis Mathisen Referat: This paper which was presented at the 13th International Conference on Violence, Abuse and Trauma at San Diego on September 15-17 2008 illustrates the usefulness of the theoretical perspective of intersectionality in analyzing power relations in abusive situations with regard to women with physical disabilities. In part one of this paper, I introduce the concept of intersectionality as it has been applied by de los Reyes and Mulinari with regard to their research on power relations and inequality. In part two, I illustrate my use of the concept by some cases from my own qualitative study and present the results of the analysis of abuse in different social contexts. I close with some concluding remarks on the value of using the concept in analyzing power relations in abusive situations in general.
    [Show full text]
  • Family Types and Intimate-Partner Violence: a Historical Perspective∗
    Family Types and Intimate-Partner Violence: A Historical Perspective∗ Ana Tur-Prats† June 2015 Abstract This paper examines the historical origins of violence against women, in contrast to earlier literature, which focused only on short-term determinants. It analyses the relation- ship between traditional family patterns (stem versus nuclear) and intimate-partner vio- lence (IPV). Stem families are those in which one child stays in the parental household with spouse and children, so that at least two generations live together. I model the behavior of a traditional peasant family and show how coresidence with a mother-in-law increases a wife’s contribution to farmwork. This increased contribution is shown to potentially de- crease the level of violence, since the wife’s reduced productivity acts as a deterrent. In my empirical analysis I use Spanish data, as Spain offers IPV measures of the highest quality as well as a persistent geographical distribution of family types. Results show that areas where stem families were socially predominant in the past currently have a lower IPV rate. I con- trol for a large number of contemporary, historical, and geographical variables. To address causality, I use the stages and differences in the Christian conquest of the Iberian Peninsula (722-1492) as an instrument for the different family types. My instrumental variable results are consistent with my original findings. Keywords: Gender inequality, cultural norms, persistence, inheritance, coresidence, Christian con- quest. JEL Classification: D03, J12, N43, Z13. ∗ I thank Larbi Alaoui, Antonio Cabrales, Pierre-Andre´ Chiappori, Gordon Dahl, Mercedes Fernandez-Martorell,´ Christian Fons-Rosen, Enrique Garc´ıa-Bernal, Paola Giuliano, Nathan Nunn, Javier Ortega, Luigi Pascali, Imran Rasul, Pablo Salvador Coderch, Marcos Vera- Hernandez,´ Jordi Vidal-Robert, and Hans-Joachim Voth for insightful comments.
    [Show full text]
  • Whats Yours Is Mine
    ‘What’s yours is mine’ The different forms of economic abuse and its impact on women and children experiencing domestic violence Nicola Sharp October 2008 RESEARCH REPORT Acknowledgements This report is based on the dissertation I wrote in completion of the MA in Woman and Child Abuse at London Metropolitan University. I wish to thank Joanna Lovett and Maria Garner at the Child and Woman Abuse Studies Unit (CWASU) for their support in producing it. I am also grateful to the national domestic violence charity Refuge for allowing me to undertake this piece of research across their services and for publishing the findings. A particular thanks to Sue and Saiqa the ‘floating supporters’ for driving me from interview to interview. Above all a big thank you to everyone who filled in the economic abuse questionnaire and to Refuge’s service users who were willing to be interviewed – Nadine, Jas, Kelly, Zita, Rachel, Marie, Seon, Sally, Trixie, Izzie, Tina, Pamela, Sara, Mala, Ansar, Sobia, Irshad, Amber, Hana and Lea – you know who you are! Published by: Refuge 2008 Author: Nicola Sharp Copyright: Please credit the author when quoting from this document Contents Introduction. 4 Literature review . 7 Research design . 16 Research findings . 19 Discussion of research findings and conclusions . 35 Implications for policy and practice: recommendations . 41 Bibliography . 44 Appendices. Available online He wanted to control my bank account and money. His exact words were that he was the man and the man was supposed to be the head of the house. I was supposed to go to work and bring my money to him and whenever I needed something I was supposed to ask.
    [Show full text]
  • Employer Abuse, Worker Resistance, and the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
    University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law 1988 Employer Abuse, Worker Resistance, and the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Regina Austin University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship Part of the Civil Rights and Discrimination Commons, Inequality and Stratification Commons, Labor and Employment Law Commons, Law and Gender Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal History Commons, Race and Ethnicity Commons, Torts Commons, and the Work, Economy and Organizations Commons Repository Citation Austin, Regina, "Employer Abuse, Worker Resistance, and the Tort of Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress" (1988). Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law. 1311. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/faculty_scholarship/1311 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Scholarship at Penn Law by an authorized administrator of Penn Law: Legal Scholarship Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Fnl.;,-' ~ _ _plo · v} er; , _[L\ _,._ hl'j :.A ,.;: u ,'lne ~ ~~A J1 Vnrl ;. -~"' Pf·- ~ - ; pJ!._ ""- p"- ~ ~.!. s. t ance. ~ and th e T ort of In tentional Infliction o f iG'Lmonona · • ""n· J·LlS · t ress T he conventional Wis dom is that, in the workplace, abuse can be a legitima te instrument of worker comrol and an ap propriate form of dis­ cipline .1 By "abuse" I mean treatment tha;: is intentionally emotionally p<~inful, offensive, or insulting. Rebukes and reprimands are the very sort of "behavior that one would expect from a superior who is dissatis­ fied wi th his subordinate's p erformance.
    [Show full text]
  • Child and Vulnerable Adult Protection Policy
    Child and Vulnerable Adult Protection Policy Purpose and Scope This Policy exists to protect children and other vulnerable adults from abuse in the delivery of Kids Alive International (KAI) programmes. It affirms Hope for Kids International’s commitment to the safety and protection of children and vulnerable adults and to ensure that in our work we do not perpetuate or reinforce systematic or structural abuse and discrimination of children. This Policy outlines our guiding principles, roles, responsibilities, and approach towards implementation, which will ensure that this commitment is integrated into all areas of our work The Policy applies to anyone who represents (or is associated with) Hope for Kids International, including, but not limited to, staff, volunteers, partners (local NGO’s, affiliates, and government counterparts), contractors, donors, and board members. Introduction Since KAI oversees the activities of the various Kids Alive network partner programmes around the world, Hope for Kids International will abide in full with the policies adopted by KAI. We will also maintain a monitoring role to ensure that the KAI policies meet or exceed UK accepted best practice in regard to child and vulnerable adult protection. The May 2018 version of the KAI Child and Vulnerable Adult Protection Policy is included in full at Appendix A and, in our view, represents current best practice. For the sake of clarity, Hope for Kids International will ensure that all of its staff, missionaries, volunteers, teams, and trustees: • Have an up-to-date Disclosure & Barring Service (DBS) check upon commencing employment or service as a trustee (and then renewed every three years) or prior to engaging in voluntary work of team visits with Hope for Kids International; • Sign a “Code of Safe Conduct and Declaration” (included at the end of the KAI policy document) when a visit to a programme site is anticipated.
    [Show full text]