Reticular Lamina and Basilar Membrane Vibrations in Living Mouse Cochleae
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in living mouse cochleae Tianying Rena,1, Wenxuan Hea, and David Kempb aOregon Hearing Research Center, Department of Otolaryngology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239; and bUniversity College London Ear Institute, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, United Kingdom Edited by Mario A. Ruggero, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL, and accepted by Editorial Board Member Peter L. Strick July 1, 2016 (received for review May 9, 2016) It is commonly believed that the exceptional sensitivity of mamma- (Fig. 1 A and B and Materials and Methods). The results from this lian hearing depends on outer hair cells which generate forces for study do not demonstrate the commonly expected cochlear local amplifying sound-induced basilar membrane vibrations, yet how feedback but instead indicate a global hydromechanical mecha- cellular forces amplify vibrations is poorly understood. In this study, nism for outer hair cells to enhance hearing sensitivity. by measuring subnanometer vibrations directly from the reticular lamina at the apical ends of outer hair cells and from the basilar Results membrane using a custom-built heterodyne low-coherence interfer- Vibrations of the Reticular Lamina and Basilar Membrane in Sensitive ometer, we demonstrate in living mouse cochleae that the sound- Cochleae. Vibrations of the reticular lamina and basilar membrane induced reticular lamina vibration is substantially larger than the measured from a sensitive cochlea are presented in Fig. 1 C–J. basilar membrane vibration not only at the best frequency but Below 50 dB sound pressure level (SPL) (0 dB SPL = 20 μPa), the surprisingly also at low frequencies. The phase relation of reticular basilar membrane vibration increased with frequency and reached lamina to basilar membrane vibration changes with frequency by up the maximum at ∼48 kHz (best frequency) and then decreased, to 180 degrees from ∼135 degrees at low frequencies to ∼-45 de- forming a sharp peak (Fig. 1C). The peak became broader and grees at the best frequency. The magnitude and phase differences shifted toward low frequencies as the sound level increased. The between reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations are ab- ratios of the basilar membrane displacement to the malleus dis- sent in postmortem cochleae. These results indicate that outer hair placement at low sound levels confirm the best frequency of NEUROSCIENCE cells do not amplify the basilar membrane vibration directly through ∼48 kHz (Fig. 1E). The peak ratio decreased from >100 to ∼3as a local feedback as commonly expected; instead, they actively vi- the sound level increased from 20 to 80 dB SPL, indicating ∼30-dB brate the reticular lamina over a broad frequency range. The outer nonlinear compression. The overlapping curves at frequencies hair cell-driven reticular lamina vibration collaboratively interacts below 35 kHz (Fig. 1E) indicate the linear growth at low fre- with the basilar membrane traveling wave primarily through the quencies. The basilar membrane vibration phase (referred to as the cochlear fluid, which boosts peak responses at the best-frequency malleus phase) decreased with frequency (Fig. 1G). Data in Fig. 1 location and consequently enhances hearing sensitivity and frequency C E selectivity. and demonstrate the high sensitivity, sharp tuning, and non- linearity of basilar membrane responses to ultrasonic sounds in the cochlea | outer hair cells | hearing | cochlear amplifier | interferometry living mouse cochlea, which are similar to previous measurements in squirrel monkeys (19), gerbils (20–23), chinchillas (17, 24, 25), guinea pigs (26–28), and mice (7, 29, 30). s the auditory sensory organ, the mammalian cochlea is able By contrast, the displacement of the reticular lamina vibration to detect soft sounds at levels as low as ∼20 μPa, equivalent to A (Fig. 1D) was substantially larger than that of the basilar mem- eardrum vibrations of <1-pm displacement (1), which is >100-fold brane vibration. At 20 dB SPL, reticular lamina vibrations were smaller than the diameter of a hydrogen atom. The cochlea’sre- the greatest approximately at the same frequency as the best markable sensitivity is commonly attributed to a micromechanical frequency of the basilar membrane (∼48 kHz). Notably, the peak feedback system, which amplifies soft sounds using forces gen- erated by outer hair cells (2–10). In addition to active bundle movements (2), mammalian outer hair cells are capable of Significance changing their lengths in response to electrical stimulation in vitro (11–14). This electromechanical force production is termed outer The remarkable sensitivity of mammalian hearing depends on hair cell electromotility or somatic motility, which is produced by auditory sensory outer hair cells, yet how these cells enhance the the membrane protein, prestin (15). Transgenic mice without hearing sensitivity remains unclear. By measuring subnanometer prestin or with altered prestin suffer from severe hearing loss vibrations directly from motile outer hair cells in living inner ear, (4, 16). Targeted inactivation of prestin over well-defined cochlear we demonstrate that outer hair cells do not directly amplify the segments dramatically reduces the traveling wave’speakresponse basilar membrane vibration by local feedback as commonly (17). Recent micromechanical measurements in sensitive living expected; instead, they actively vibrate the reticular lamina over a broad frequency range. The outer hair cell-driven reticular lamina mouse cochleae showed (18) that electrical stimulation of outer vibration interacts with the basilar membrane traveling wave hair cells induces vigorous vibrations of the reticular lamina at the through the cochlear fluid, resulting in maximal vibrations at the apical surfaces of the outer hair cells. Whereas this experiment best-frequency location, consequently enhancing hearing sensi- demonstrates that outer hair cells are capable of generating sub- tivity. This finding advances our knowledge of mammalian hear- stantial forces to vibrate cochlear microstructures in vivo, the lack ingandmayleadtostrategiesforrestoringhearinginpatients. of frequency selectivity of the electrically induced reticular lamina vibration, however, is inconsistent with the sharp tuning of the Author contributions: T.R. designed research; T.R. and W.H. performed research; T.R., W.H., basilar membrane vibration. Because electrical stimulation is not a and D.K. analyzed data; and T.R., W.H., and D.K. wrote the paper. natural stimulus of the auditory system, we here investigate how The authors declare no conflict of interest. acoustically induced reticular lamina vibrations interact with bas- This article is a PNAS Direct Submission. M.A.R. is a Guest Editor invited by the Editorial ilar membrane vibrations in sensitive living mouse cochleae, using Board. a custom-built scanning heterodyne low-coherence interferometer 1To whom correspondence should be addressed. Email: [email protected]. www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1607428113 PNAS Early Edition | 1of6 Downloaded by guest on September 29, 2021 nonlinear compression. Surprisingly, displacements of the reticular lamina at frequencies far below the best frequency were also ∼10- fold greater than those of the basilar membrane (Fig. 1D). Dis- placement ratios of the reticular lamina to the malleus in Fig. 1F show a peak magnitude of ∼1,000 at low sound levels, which is larger than that of the basilar membrane (Fig. 1E). With an in- crease in sound level from 20 to 80 dB SPL, the peak magnitude decreased by ∼45 dB for the reticular lamina vibration (Fig. 1F) and by ∼30 dB for the basilar membrane vibration (Fig. 1E). The phase responses of the reticular lamina (Fig. 1H) were similar to those of the basilar membrane (Fig. 1G). Ratios of the reticular lamina to basilar membrane displacement greater than one (Fig. 1I) confirm that the reticular lamina vi- brated more than the basilar membrane at all frequencies and sound levels. Near 48 kHz, 30-dB SPL tone-induced reticular lamina vibration was approximately sevenfold greater than that of the basilar membrane. This difference decreased with sound level and approached one at 80 dB SPL. At a given sound level, the magnitude ratio decreased with frequency up to ∼48 kHz. The magnitude ratio curves also shifted toward low frequencies with the sound level increase. Surprisingly, the largest-magnitude ratios occurred at frequencies far below the best frequency and at high sound levels, which likely resulted from the saturation near the best frequency. The phase difference of >90 degrees in Fig. 1J indicates that the reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrated approximately in opposite directions at frequencies below 15 kHz. The lack of substantial phase difference near 48 kHz, however, demonstrates that the reticular lamina and the basilar membrane moved in the same direction at the best frequency. Vibrations of the Reticular Lamina and Basilar Membrane in Insensitive Cochleae. Under postmortem conditions, the basilar membrane and reticular lamina vibrations (blue lines in Fig. 2 A and B) showed decreased magnitude near the best frequency, peak shift toward low frequencies, and linear growth with the sound level. In contrast with the lack of substantial postmortem change in basilar membrane vibration at frequencies below 30 kHz in Fig. 2A,the reticular lamina displacements decreased by ∼10-fold (or 20 dB) over the same frequency range (Fig. 2B). These postmortem magnitude