Mt. Tamalpais
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Lagunitas Creek Floodplain and Riparian Enhancement Design
COASTAL CONSERVANCY Staff Recommendation May 26, 2016 LAGUNITAS CREEK FLOODPLAIN AND RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT DESIGN Project No. 16-020-01. Project Manager: Joel Gerwein RECOMMENDED ACTION: Authorization to disburse up to $490,578 to Turtle Island Restoration Network to produce design plans, prepare permit applications and provide environmental compliance for restoration of floodplain coho salmon rearing habitat on a one mile reach of Lagunitas Creek, Olema, Marin County. LOCATION: Olema, Marin County PROGRAM CATEGORY: Integrated Coastal and Marine Resources Protection EXHIBITS Exhibit 1: Project Location Maps Exhibit 2: Site Photographs Exhibit 3: Project Letters RESOLUTION AND FINDINGS: Staff recommends that the State Coastal Conservancy adopt the following resolution pursuant to Section 31220 of the Public Resources Code: “The State Coastal Conservancy hereby authorizes the disbursement of an amount not to exceed $490,578 (four hundred ninety thousand five hundred and seventy-eight dollars) to Turtle Island Restoration Network (TIRN) to produce design plans, prepare permit applications and provide environmental compliance for a floodplain restoration project to improve coho salmon rearing habitat along a one mile reach of Lagunitas Creek floodplain near the community of Olema, Marin County, subject to the condition that prior to the disbursement of any funds for the project, TIRN shall submit for the review and approval of the Conservancy’s Executive Officer a workplan, schedule and budget, and the names and qualifications of any contractors for the project.” Staff further recommends that the Conservancy adopt the following findings: “Based on the accompanying staff report and attached exhibits, the State Coastal Conservancy hereby finds that: Page 1 of 12 LAGUNITAS CREEK FLOODPLAIN AND RIPARIAN ENHANCEMENT 1. -
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS
NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS OCTOBER 2005 HISTORICAL OCCURRENCE OF COHO SALMON IN STREAMS OF THE CENTRAL CALIFORNIA COAST COHO SALMON EVOLUTIONARILY SIGNIFICANT UNIT Brian C. Spence Scott L. Harris Weldon E. Jones Matthew N. Goslin Aditya Agrawal Ethan Mora NOAA-TM-NMFS-SWFSC-383 U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Marine Fisheries Service Southwest Fisheries Science Center NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), organized in 1970, has evolved into an agency which establishes national policies and manages and conserves our oceanic, coastal, and atmospheric resources. An organizational element within NOAA, the Office of Fisheries is responsible for fisheries policy and the direction of the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS). In addition to its formal publications, the NMFS uses the NOAA Technical Memorandum series to issue informal scientific and technical publications when complete formal review and editorial processing are not appropriate or feasible. Documents within this series, however, reflect sound professional work and may be referenced in the formal scientific and technical literature. Disclaimer of endorsement: Reference to any specific commercial products, process, or service by trade name, trademark, manufacturer, or otherwise does not constitute or imply its endorsement, recommendation, or favoring by the United States Government. The views and opinions of authors expressed in this document do not necessarily state or reflect those of NOAA or the United States Government, and shall not be used for advertising or product endorsement purposes. NOAA Technical Memorandum NMFS This TM series is used for documentation and timely communication of preliminary results, interim reports, or special purpose information. -
Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning
Scanned for KRIS State of California The Resources Agency Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing LAGUNITAS CREEK, Marin County STREAM EVALUATION REPORT 86-2 APRIL 1986 IFIM study site near Tocaloma at about 35 cfs. IFIM study site near Gallager Ranch at about 22 cfs. ERRATA Page i Author Gary E. Smith2 Page 2 Paragraph 2, 14th line to Syncaris, it seems probable that the proposed summer and early Page 32 Recommendations, 3.a., first line If Nacasio Reservoir inflow during the preceeding month is Inside of back cover, photo caption, third line and deepened pools and Department of Fish and Game Stream Evaluation Report Report No. 86-2 Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing, Lagunitas Creek, Marin County April, 1986 Gordon K. Van Vleck George Deukmejian Jack C. Parnell Secretary for Resources Governor Director The Resources Agency State of California Department of Fish and Game Instream Flow Requirements, Anadromous Salmonids Spawning and Rearing Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, I/ By Gary E. Smith 2 Abstract The Instream Flow Incremental Methodology was used to assess steelhead and coho salmon spawning and rearing streamflow/habitat relationships and requirements in Lagunitas Creek, Marin County, California. The annual flow regime developed considers individual species life stage needs. Approximately 37% of the average annual runoff is identified as being needed for spawning and rearing purposes. Typically, natural summer flows need augmentation and natural winter flows more than meet fishery needs. 1_/ Stream Evaluation Report No. 86-2, April 1986. Stream Evaluation Program. 2/ Environmental Services Division, Sacramento, California -ii- TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Abstract................................... -
Circumambulation Pilgrimages Around Iona, Mount Tamalpais and Labyrinths
Dominican Scholar Faculty Authored Books and Book Contributions Faculty and Staff Scholarship 10-27-2017 Circling Centre, Finding Our Way Home: Circumambulation Pilgrimages around Iona, Mount Tamalpais and Labyrinths Cindy Pavlinac Department of Art, Art History and Design, Dominican University of California, [email protected] Survey: Let us know how this paper benefits you. Recommended Citation Pavlinac, Cindy, "Circling Centre, Finding Our Way Home: Circumambulation Pilgrimages around Iona, Mount Tamalpais and Labyrinths" (2017). Faculty Authored Books and Book Contributions. 131. https://scholar.dominican.edu/books/131 This Contribution to a Book is brought to you for free and open access by the Faculty and Staff Scholarship at Dominican Scholar. It has been accepted for inclusion in Faculty Authored Books and Book Contributions by an authorized administrator of Dominican Scholar. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Circling Centre, Finding Our Way Home: Circumambulation Pilgrimages around Iona, Mount Tamalpais and Labyrinths Cindy Pavlinac Introduction Pilgrimage requires a journey. Humans are walkers, traversing the landscape seeking adventure and home. Walking pilgrimages along historic routes and concentrated journeys in a labyrinth all involve circling a centre. Places of natural grandeur have long attracted those undertaking journeys to sites of magic, prophecy, safety, hope and the supernatural. The landscape informs the journey and pilgrims notice things that can only be revealed by walking through that specific landscape. The boundaries between inner and outer landscape become blurred as the pilgrim enters an expanded relationship to the self. Walking engages the body while freeing the mind for deep contemplation and potential transformation. Following a labyrinth, a nature trail, or a saint’s footsteps requires surrendering control and trusting the journey. -
Lagunitas Creek Watershed Sediment Reduction And
CONSOLIDATED PROPOSAL FOR COASTAL NONPOINT SOURCE PROJECTS (GRANT AGREEMENT NO. 04-155-552-2) FINAL PROJECT REPORT Prepared by Marin Municipal Water District Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed Friends of Novato Creek Southern Sonoma County Resource Conservation District Sonoma Ecology Center In partnership with North Bay Watershed Association May 2008 Acknowledgements The following individuals and consultants provided valuable review, comments, construction and oversight of the various project elements and studies completed under this project: Consultants and Contractors Pacific Watershed Associates Harold Appleton, Prunuske Chatham, Inc. Kathie Lowrey, Prunuske Chatham, Inc Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program Sonoma Ecology Center County of Sonoma, GIS Dept. Laurel Collins, Watershed Sciences Gina Cuclis, Cuclis PR Funding for this project was provided by the State Water Resources Control Board under the Proposition 13 Coastal Nonpoint Source Pollution Control Grant Program with matching funds and in-kind contributions from the North Bay Watershed Association, California State Coastal Conservancy, the California Department of Fish and Game, Marin Municipal Water District, Friends of Corte Madera Creek Watershed, Ross Valley Sanitation District, Marin County Stormwater Pollution Prevention Program, Town of San Anselmo, Marin Conservation Corps, Friends of Novato Creek, Southern Sonoma County Resource Conservation District, Sonoma Ecology Center, landowners and citizens in Petaluma & San Antonio Creek watersheds, and numerous volunteer efforts throughout the project area. Final Report Consolidated Concept Proposal for Nonpoint Source Projects, Greater San Pablo Bay Area Grant Agreement No. 04-155-552-2 Table of Contents Page A. Project Summary……………………………………………………………….. 1 B. Project Location ……………………………………………...………………… 2 C. Project Performance …………………….…………………………….…...… 7 1. San Anselmo Creek Park: Riprap Removal and Restoration Project Planning and Implementation…………………………..…… 7 Project Performance..…………………………………………………. -
DRAFT City of Santa Cruz Habitat Conservation Plan Conservation
DRAFT City of Santa Cruz Habitat Conservation Plan Conservation Strategy for Steelhead and Coho Salmon August 10, 2011 DRAFT HCP Fisheries Conservation Strategy Page 2 Table of Contents 1. Introduction ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2. Approach to the Conservation Strategy .................................................................................... 10 3. Biological Goals and Objectives .................................................................................................. 13 4. Avoidance and Minimization Measures ..................................................................................... 15 4.1. Water Supply Operations ...................................................................................................... 15 4.1.1. Water Diversions ............................................................................................................ 15 4.1.1.1. Minimizing the effects of City Diversions ............................................................. 16 4.1.1.2. Rationale for Developing Instream Flow Targets ............................................... 18 4.1.1.3. Liddell Spring Diversion .......................................................................................... 21 4.1.1.4. Reggiardo Creek Diversion .................................................................................... 24 4.1.1.5. Laguna Creek Diversion ........................................................................................ -
Spring Wildflower Adventures in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area
Spring Wildflower Adventures in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area Author’s Note: This article “Spring Wildflower Adventures in the Greater San Francisco Bay Area” is also a chapter in my travel guidebook/ebookNorthern California Travel: The Best Options. Parallel coverage of nature in Northern California occurs in my latest travel guidebook/ebookNorthern California History Travel Adventures: 35 Suggested Trips. All my travel guidebooks/ebooks on California can be seen on myAmazon Author Page. By Lee Foster The refreshing opportunity for spring wildflower adventures makes mid-March to mid-May a joyous annual travel time in the San Francisco Bay Area. Each year’s bloom time will vary, due to the rain amount, daily temperatures, and cloud cover vs sun. Call ahead to the locations (see phones at end of this article) to be assured that your visit time will be optimal for bloom. Wildflowers please the fortunate viewer in many ways. Golden carpets of the small goldfields flowers or abundant clusters of poppies delight the eye and lift the spirit. More delicate and less revealing flowers, especially the Douglas iris, reward a searcher in the shadier woodlands. Highly specialized dashes of color, such as red larkspur, add punch to the green tapestry of spring. The variety in wildflowers stuns the imagination. Identifying wildflowers can excite some detective passion. The first reality is simply to enjoy the flowers. But knowing their names and collecting a personal record of memories in seeing them can be an enriching experience. Start with brochures available at some wildflower parks. Move on to Helen Sharsmith’s bookSpring Wildflowers of the San Francisco Bay Region. -
Angel Island Angel Island Geography Location San Francisco Bay Coordinates 37°52
Angel Island Angel Island Geography Location San Francisco Bay Coordinates 37°52′N 122°26′W / 37.86°N 122.43°W Area 1.2 sq mi (3.1 km2) Elevation 788.76 ft (240.41 m) Highest point Mount Caroline Livermore Country United States State California County Marin County City and County of San Francisco Demographics Population 57 Density 18.35/km2 (47.5/sq mi) Additional information California Historical Landmark Reference #: 529 Angel Island is an island in San Francisco Bay offering expansive 360° views of the San Francisco skyline, the Marin County Headlands and Mount Tamalpais. The entire island is included within Angel Island State Park and is administered by California State Parks. The island, a California Historical Landmark, has been used for a variety of purposes, including military forts, a US Public Health Service Quarantine Station, and a US Bureau of Immigration inspection and detention facility. The Angel Island Immigration Station on the northeast corner of the island, where officials detained, inspected, and examined approximately one million immigrants, has been designated a National Historic Landmark. Contents Geography History Fort McDowell Immigration station Angel Island State Park Ecology 2008 fire Access Geography Port of Angel Island Angel Island is the second largest island in area of the San Francisco Bay (Alameda is the largest). The island is so large that on a clear day, Sonoma and Napa can be seen from the north side of the island; San Jose can be seen from the south side of the island. The highest point on the island, almost exactly at its center, is Mount Caroline Livermore at a height of 788 feet (240 m). -
Lagunitas Creek
ORDER: WR 95-17 LAGUNITAS CREEK Order Amending Water Rights and Requiring Changes in Water Diversion Practices to Protect Fishing Resources and to Prevent Unauthorized Diversion and Use of Water October 26,1995 STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY STATE OF CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD In the Matter of ) ) FISHERY PROTECTION AND WATER ) RIGHT ISSUES OF LAGUNITAS CREEK ) ORDER: WR 95-17 ) Involving Water Right Permits 5633, ) SOURCE: Lagunitas 9390, 2800 and 18546 of Marin ) Creek Municipal Water District) ) (Applications 9892, 14278, 17317, ) COUNTY: Marin and 26242), ) ) Water Right Permits 19724 and 19725 ) (Applications 25062 and 35079) and ) Diversion of Water Under Claim of ) Pre-1914 Appropriative Water Rights ) by North Marin Water District, and ) ) Water Right License 4324 ) (Application 13965) and Diversion ) of Water Under Claim of Riparian ) Right by Waldo Giacomini ) ) ORDER AMENDING WATER RIGHTS AND REQUIRING CHANGES IN WATER DIVERSION PRACTICES TO PROTECT FISHERY RESOURCES AND TO PREVENT UNAUTHORIZED DIVERSION AND USE OF WATER TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE 1.0 INTRODUCTION ...................................................... 1 2.0 BACKGROUND......................................................... 3 2.1 Description of Watershed .................................. 3 2.2 Hydrology (Precipitation and Streamflow) .................. 6 2.3 History of Development in the Watershed .................... 8 2.4 Summary of Water Right Claims .............................. 8 2.5 Expansion of Kent Lake (Chronology of Events) .................................................... 10 2.6 Complaints by Marin Municipal Water District and Trout Unlimited ............................. 12 2.7 Fish and Game Code Provisions ............................... 12 2.7.1 Fish and Game Code Section 5937.................... 12 2.7.2 Salmon, Steelhead Trout and Anadromous Fisheries Program Act ................ 12 2.8 Authority of State Water Resources Control Board ............................................ -
Major Streams and Watersheds of West Marin D
3 1 Chilen o Va lle t y S R d I D St 80 Major Streams and Watersheds of West Marin d R San Anto o ni i o n R o d t Sa n n A A nton io Rd n a S 1å3 4 6 91 d R s West Marin Schools e y e Marshall P R etal t 1, BOLINAS-STINSON SCHOOL (BOLINAS) L um P a a R a k d m e WALKER CREEK lu vi ta 2, BOLINAS-STINSON SCHOOL (STINSON) lle Pe R S d t a 3, INVERNESS ELEM. SCHOOL t WATERSHED e R ou te 4, LAGUNITAS ELEM. SCHOOL 1 Eastshore W ils 5, LINCOLN ELEM. SCHOOL S on t H a å5 ill t R e d 6, MARIN SCHOOL OF THE ARTS R o u 4 t SOULAJULE RESERVOIR 7, NICASIO ELEM. SCHOOL e 1 8, SAN GERONIMO VALLEY ELEM. SCHOOL 6 L 7 a k e v 9, SHORELINE HIGH SCHOOL il le R d 9 8 10, SHORELINE INDEPENDENT STUDY S h 3 o 7 re 11, TOMALES ELEM. SCHOOL li ne H w 12, TOMALES HIGH SCHOOL y 13, WALKER CREEK RANCH S h o 14, WEST MARIN ELEM. SCHOOL r e 7 l i 3 n y e a w H ar h San M in ig w D H y N r te ova U ta to n S B i lv t 0 d e S d 6 n t a L S te s d 1 t a 7 R n v l o t o e u B 23 t m s e STAFFORD LAKE d 1 m H i o S o i g h A w th N d w e o e r a t va on to R y A d B 1 v R lv t G e d ran 0 a e S t A v ve 1 r m A h D lu t r n 7 De L o ta o ong rb e s Av a il e P H e s W v 3 S e A å 0 3 i y r e lo F b ra R n t ia c in D is o D P r g a St Hi hw k ate a 3 e y 1 B 1 vd 7 l l v 3 B 3 d 2 y 20 nd a la w w h o ig 6 R H 7 te ta N S o 41 v 43 Inverness a to B l y v LAGOON k d P t e s un 4 2 S 9 NICASIO RESERVOIR 0 Pt. -
Controlled Burns on the Urban Fringe, Mount Tamalpais, Marin County, California1
Controlled Burns on the Urban Fringe, Mount Tamalpais, Marin County, California1 Thomas E. Spittler2 Abstract: The California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology provided technical assistance to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection in assessing potential geologic hazards that could be affected by proposed prescribed burns on Mt. Tamalpais. This research yielded the following conclusions: (1) landsliding and surface erosion have contributed to the denudation of Mount Tamalpais; (2) Debris flows and surface erosion could affect property and the environment on and below the mountain; (3) The removal of chaparral will reduce the stability of the slopes; and (4) Prescribed burning may reduce the risk and lessen the destructive effects of wildfire and may therefore have significantly less impact on both landsliding and surface erosion than the probable wildfire event modeled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The last conclusion is based on the Fig 1 ocation map showing the boundaries of following considerations: controlled burns . L the Mount Tamalpais Vegetation Management Plan separated in time and space would expose area and its relation to urbanizing areas of smaller slope areas to the effects of rainfall Marin County. than would a wildfire; a hot wildfire would damage the soil much more than a cool controlled fire; slope-damaging fire-fighting measures, such as tractor-constructed fire The Marin County Fire Department, in trails, would not be needed for controlled cooperation with the California Department of burns; and areas of geologic concern, such as Forestry and Fire Protection, has developed a colluvial-filled hollows, will be included in plan to reduce the threat of catastrophic the development of the prescription for wildfires through the use of prescribed burns controlled burns on Mount Tamalpais. -
Evaluation of Coho and Steelhead Production in the San Geronimo Valley Headwaters of the Lagunitas Creek Watershed, 2006-2008
Evaluation of Coho and Steelhead Production in the San Geronimo Valley Headwaters of the Lagunitas Creek Watershed, 2006-2008 Prepared by Christopher Pincetich, Ph.D., SPAWN Watershed Biologist Todd Steiner, M.S., SPAWN Executive Director Paola Bouley, M.S., SPAWN Conservation Program Director Ssssssssssssssssss Salmon Protection Salmon Protection And Watershed Network And Watershed PO Box 370 • Forest Knolls, CA 94933 Network Ph. 415.663.8590 • Fax 415.663.9534 PO Box 400 • Forest www.SpawnUSA.org Knolls, CA 94933 i Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN) Evaluation of Coho and Steelhead Production in the San Geronimo Valley Headwaters of the Lagunitas Creek Watershed, 2006-2008 Table of Contents Abstract…………………………………………………………………………………………………...…1 Introduction……………………………………………………………….…………………….…………...1 Lagunitas Coho………………………………………….…………………………..……...…...1 Lagunitas Steelhead………………………………………….…………………….….…….....2 San Geronimo Valley Headwaters………………………………………….….………….....2 Salmon Protection and Watershed Network (SPAWN)………………...…..…………....2 Methods……………………………………………………………………………………………..…...…4 Smolt Trap Design and Location ………………………………………………...……...….4 Daily Monitoring………………………………………………………………………..…..……5 Data Analyses………………………………………………………………………………...…6 Fulton Condition Factor……………………………………………………………..……..…..6 Results……………………………………………………………………………………..……...….….…6 Coho Salmon………………………………………………………………………..…..…….…7 Steelhead……………………………………..……………………………………..…..………10 Other Aquatic Organisms ……………………………………..……………………..…...…14 Discussion……………………………………………………………………………………….……...…15