Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Update 2012

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Updated SFRA 2012 Watford Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume I Mar 2012 Update based on the SFRA for Watford Borough Council et al 1 [Dec 2007, Halcrow Group Limited 2] And on additional information on fluvial flooding from the Environment Agency based on the Strategic Modelling Study for the Upper Colne Area from 2011 [Halcrow Group Limited] Dacorum Borough Council St Albans City & District Council Three Rivers District Council Watford Borough Council Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Volume I 1 Original title: Dacorum Borough Council, St Albans City & District Council ,Three Rivers District Council, Watford Borough Council: Strategic Flood Risk Assessment, Volume I 2 2007 Report: from Halcrow Group Limited Windsor House Queensgate Britannia Road Waltham Cross Hertfordshire EN8 7NX Tel +44 (0)1992 707100 Fax +44 (0)1992 760594 www.halcrow.com Halcrow Group Limited has prepared this report in accordance with the instructions of their client, Dacorum Borough Council St Albans City & District Council Three Rivers District Council Watford Borough Council, for their sole and specific use. Any other persons who use any information contained herein do so at their own risk. Contents Amendment Record This report has been issued and amended as follows: Issue Revision Description Date Signed 1 0 Draft Final Report June 07 PLW, Halcrow 1 1 Draft Final Report August 07 PLW, Halcrow 2 0 Final Report August 07 PLW, Halcrow 1 Updated Report Feb 2012 PK, Watford Borough Council Contents The Updated SFRA 2012 Error! Bookmark not defined. Foreword 1 Executive Summary 4 1 Introduction 7 1.1 Overview 7 1.2 Study Area 7 2 SFRA Approach & Methodology 12 2.1 SFRA Aims 12 2.2 Outcomes of the SFRA Process 12 2.3 The Sequential Test 13 2.4 The Exception Test 15 2.5 Level 1 SFRA Methodology 16 2.6 Need for Level 2 SFRA 17 3 Policy Framework 19 3.1 Overview 19 3.2 Planning Policy Framework 19 3.3 National Policy 19 3.4 Regional Policy 21 3.5 Local Policy 23 3.6 Possible Funding Mechanisms 28 3.7 Summary 29 4 Data Collection and Review 30 4.1 Overview 30 4.2 Consultation Process 30 4.3 Environment Agency Flood Zone Maps 32 4.4 Detailed Hydraulic Modelling 33 4.5 Historical Flooding 34 4.6 Flood Defences 53 4.7 Topographical Data 56 4.8 Site-Specific Flood Risk Assessments - Developers 57 4.9 Flood Risk Management Strategies - Environment Agency 57 5 Strategic Flood Risk Mapping 63 5.1 Overview 63 5.2 Surface Water (Land Drainage) and Groundwater Flooding 66 5.3 Sewer Flooding 66 5.4 Climate Change 67 5.5 Residual Risk 69 5.6 Review of Indicative Sites 70 6 Flood Risk Management Policy Recommendations 71 6.1 Overview 71 6.2 Future Flood Alleviation Schemes 71 6.3 Policy Recommendations 72 6.4 Guidance to Developers 79 6.5 Sustainable Urban Drainage Systems 84 7 Flood Warning and Emergency Planning 88 7.1 Existing Flood Warning System 88 7.2 Future Improvements to Flood Warning 89 7.3 Emergency Planning Recommendations 89 8 Recommendations 91 8.1 Site Allocation Process 91 8.2 Additional Studies 91 8.3 Council Policy 92 8.4 Emergency Planning 92 8.5 Future Updates to the SFRA 93 9 Glossary 94 10 References 96 11 Appendices 97 Appendix A – PPS25 Overview 98 Appendix B – Data Register 99 Appendix C – Communication Plan 100 Appendix D – Model Review 101 Appendix E – Fluvial Flooding History 102 Appendix F – Sewer Flooding History 103 Appendix G – Indicative Sites 104 11 Addendum 104 Addendum - SFRA 2012 addendum with update on fluvial maps attached Tables Table 4-1 Estimated magnitudes/return period of the flood events in Wheathampstead 36 Table 4-2 Estimated return periods of flood events in Batford 36 Table 4-3 Environment Agency records of groundwater flooding 38 Table 4-4 Thames Water sewer flooding records over the last 10 years 51 Table 5-1 Flood Zone 3b (Functional Floodplain) mapping 64 Table 5-2 Flood Zone 3a (high probability) mapping 65 Table 5-3 Flood Zone 2 (medium probability) mapping 65 Table 5-4 Climate change guidance (from PPS25) 67 Table 5-5 Climate change mapping ( Future = 2025 – 2115, Present = 2007) 68 Table 5-6 Flood Zone classification of indicative sites 70 Figures Figure 2-1 Application of the Sequential Test – Source: Development and Flood Risk: A Practice Guide Companion ‘Living Draft’ 14 Figure 6-1 Guidance for developers for individual planning applications 80 The Updated SFRA 2012 Following upgrades to the flood defences on the River Colne and subsequent Regional Flood Risk Modelling by the Environment Agency new information became available for an update to the Strategic Flood Risk Assessment [SFRA] published in 2007. Beginning April 2012 Watford Borough Council decided to take these changes into account for an update of the flood plain boundaries for both rivers, River Colne and River Gade. This decision will be reflected in the Updated SFRA 2012 and the Council- wide available web map 3regarding ‘Flood History and Flood Risk’, based on the Corporate GIS database. This update had already been foreseen by the consultants that prepared the SFRA published in 2007: Recommendation For Future Updates from SFRA 2007: (p91 para. 8.5 ) ‘The SFRA should be retained as a ‘living’ document and reviewed on a regular basis in light of better flood risk information and emerging policy guidance. It is recommended that outputs from ‘The Upper Colne Strategic Flood Risk Mapping (Environment Agency 2008)’ is used to update future versions of the SFRA report and associated maps.’ Background At present based, on Watford Borough Council’s Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (2007), the Functional Floodplain (FRZ 3b) is based on a 1 in 20 year event for most areas that fall within the Gade catchment in Watford. However, due to historical flooding issues and continued flood risk in the Watford area, it was decided within the SFRA process, to reduce the risk of further development exacerbating flood risk in the Colne area, That means that the Upper River Colne and Mimmshall Brook area were modelled equivalent to a 1:50 year flood event, based on the 1 in 50 year approach used Doc No D4512 Rev 0: Date: August 2007, updated May 2012 1 in the Upper Colne Flood Risk Management Strategy (2005). Since 2005, this area including other tributaries, such as parts of River Gade has been re-modelled and updated flood risk information has become available. Why it needs updating The Upper Colne Strategic Flood Risk Mapping (Upper Colne SFRM, Environment Agency 2008) provides refined PPS25 Flood Zones for the Upper River Colne, and the rest of the Watford area. This Regional Flood Risk Modelling update was done for several reasons: • previous modelling for the Watford Borough Council area was piecemeal [i.e. stemming from different FRAs and modelling approaches]; • new flood defences have been built since the 2005 modelling for the Upper Colne Flood Risk Management Strategy and SFRA; and • the River Colne in the Watford area has very limited area of available flood plain and is seen as a strategic section of the River Colne in regard to flood management (it provides an areas for the storage/holding of flood waters which would otherwise move downstream to London and cause flooding there). There has been an upgrade to the flood defences in this area which is reflected in the Upper Colne SFRM 2008 study. This led to the modelling for this area being redone. The revised maps show differences in the flood risk boundaries for this area. However, as updates to Flood Risk Zones 2 and 3 boundaries are published regularly by the Environment Agency [EA] via Geostore and these updates to GIS flood maps had already been regular practice since about 2007/8. These maps are basically ‘living maps’ and related documents are known as ‘living documents’. Changes from the 2012 Update However, the extent of Flood Risk Zone 3b (the functional floodplain), in which uses are most restricted, is a local authority decision, based on data and options provided by the Environment Agency and had not been part of previous ‘living maps’ updates. Watford Borough decided to use a model from the EA Upper Colne SFRM Study to produce a defended 1 in 50 year outline for the River Colne and a defended 1 in 20 year Doc No D4512 Rev 0: Date: August 2007, updated May 2012 2 outline for the River Gade within the local authority’s area. This floodplain definition accounts as a technical update as it had previously been used. Further effects of the above change have been explained in the ‘Updated SFRA 2012’ addendum [in the back of this document including an indicative map showing FRZ 2, 3a and 3b for fluvial flooding]. Foreword The purpose of this Strategic Flood Risk Assessment (SFRA) study is to assess and map all forms of flood risk from groundwater, surface water, sewer and river sources, taking into account future climate change predictions, and use this as an evidence base to locate future development primarily in low flood risk areas. The outputs from the SFRA will help the Four Council’s to prepare sustainable policies for the long-term management of flood risk and improve existing emergency planning procedures. Issues of emergency planning, disaster recovery and climate change have been topping the news headlines this summer as a result of the devastating flooding which occurred in the Midlands, North East and Thames Region, following record levels of rainfall (worst affected areas were Sheffield, Hull, Gloucestershire and Oxfordshire and Berkshire). By comparison, the level of flood risk is lower within the study area, particularly along the chalk tributaries (Rivers Ver, Gade, Bulbourne and Chess).
Recommended publications
  • HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource

    HA16 Rivers and Streams London's Rivers and Streams Resource

    HA16 Rivers and Streams Definition All free-flowing watercourses above the tidal limit London’s rivers and streams resource The total length of watercourses (not including those with a tidal influence) are provided in table 1a and 1b. These figures are based on catchment areas and do not include all watercourses or small watercourses such as drainage ditches. Table 1a: Catchment area and length of fresh water rivers and streams in SE London Watercourse name Length (km) Catchment area (km2) Hogsmill 9.9 73 Surbiton stream 6.0 Bonesgate stream 5.0 Horton stream 5.3 Greens lane stream 1.8 Ewel court stream 2.7 Hogsmill stream 0.5 Beverley Brook 14.3 64 Kingsmere stream 3.1 Penponds overflow 1.3 Queensmere stream 2.4 Keswick avenue ditch 1.2 Cannizaro park stream 1.7 Coombe Brook 1 Pyl Brook 5.3 East Pyl Brook 3.9 old pyl ditch 0.7 Merton ditch culvert 4.3 Grand drive ditch 0.5 Wandle 26.7 202 Wimbledon park stream 1.6 Railway ditch 1.1 Summerstown ditch 2.2 Graveney/ Norbury brook 9.5 Figgs marsh ditch 3.6 Bunces ditch 1.2 Pickle ditch 0.9 Morden Hall loop 2.5 Beddington corner branch 0.7 Beddington effluent ditch 1.6 Oily ditch 3.9 Cemetery ditch 2.8 Therapia ditch 0.9 Micham road new culvert 2.1 Station farm ditch 0.7 Ravenbourne 17.4 180 Quaggy (kyd Brook) 5.6 Quaggy hither green 1 Grove park ditch 0.5 Milk street ditch 0.3 Ravensbourne honor oak 1.9 Pool river 5.1 Chaffinch Brook 4.4 Spring Brook 1.6 The Beck 7.8 St James stream 2.8 Nursery stream 3.3 Konstamm ditch 0.4 River Cray 12.6 45 River Shuttle 6.4 Wincham Stream 5.6 Marsh Dykes
  • Newsletter 2019 Winter

    Newsletter 2019 Winter

    WENDOVER ARM NEWS Newsletter of the Wendover Arm Trust 2019 Issue 3 Winter 2019 Wendover Arm News, 201 Contents Chairman’s Report 4 Balsam Bash 12 AGM 5 Work Party Schedules 13 Operations Report 6 Family Camp 14 Tidy Friday 10 The Last Cargo by Water from 16 Heygates Mill? Membership/ 11 100 Club Your contacts on the Trust Chairman Chris Sargeant Sales Director Bob Wheal [email protected] [email protected] Leanda Vice-Chairman Webmaster Clive Johnson Richardson [email protected] [email protected] Minutes Secretary and Hon. Secretary John Rowe Jenny Brice IWA Nominee [email protected] [email protected] Treasurer Clive Wilson Newsletter Editor Carol Williams [email protected] [email protected] Operations Director Tony Bardwell Purchasing Director Peter Lockett [email protected] [email protected] Publicity Director Nigel Williams Social Media Director Ben Grinsted [email protected] [email protected] Membership Leanda Katherine Deaney Fundraising Director Secretary Richardson [email protected] [email protected] Page 2 Wendover Arm News, Winter 2019 Trust Vacancies - Urgent Membership Secretary This entails maintaining and updating the database and records. Also receiving subscriptions. This can be done from your own home in just a few hours a week. Full training and handover will be given. Please contact Katherine Deaney for more information:
  • Written Evidence Submitted by Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative

    Written Evidence Submitted by Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative

    Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative WQR0011 Written evidence submitted by Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative 1. The Colne Valley Fisheries Consultative is based in the Colne Valley, Hertfordshire and represents fishery and conservation interests in the waterscapes of the River Colne, Mimmshall Brook, Upper Colne, Ellen Brook, R Ver, R Bulbourne, R Gade, R Chess, R Misbourne, Shires Ditch, Alder Bourne, Pymmes Brook, R Brent or Crane, Frays River, R Pinn, Bigley Ditch, Poyle Channel, Colne Brook, Wraysbury River, Bonehead Ditch, Duke of Northumberland’s River, Longford River, R Ash and the many lakes which hold water in the lands surrounding the rivers. 2. The rivers to the west of the catchment are all important chalk streams draining the Chilterns. The same chalk aquifer provides much of the water for consumption to Affinity Water, the supply company, and to Thames Water which has responsibility for waste water and sewage. 3. The Grand Union Canal runs into and out of the rivers Bulbourne, Gade and Colne and the whole system is a tributary of the River Thames. 4. Membership of the Consultative is open and presently it represents about forty angling clubs with local water holdings with a combined individual membership in the regions of 50,000. Many Londoners use the Colne Valley as their local wild place for angling, walking, sailing, boating, running and cycling with good communication links to and from the city. 5. The Consultative works in partnership with many stakeholders; the individual river groups, Herts & Middlesex Wildlife Trust, London Wildlife Trust, Colne Valley Regional Park, The Environment Agency, TW and AW, Angling Trust, Fish Legal, Wild Trout Trust and many others.
  • William Britton of Staines ………………………………

    William Britton of Staines ………………………………

    WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY JOURNAL _____________________ Vol. 30 No.2 June 2012 WEST MIDDLESEX FAMILY HISTORY SOCIETY Executive Committee Chairman Mrs. Pam Smith 23 Worple Road, Staines, Middlesex TW18 1EF [email protected] Secretary Richard Chapman Golden Manor, Darby Gardens Sunbury-on-Thames, Middlesex TW16 5JW [email protected] Treasurer Ms Muriel Sprott 1 Camellia Place, Whitton, Twickenham, Middlesex TW2 7HZ [email protected] Membership Mrs Betty Elliott Secretary 89 Constance Road, Whitton, Twickenham Middlesex TW2 7HX [email protected] Programme Mrs. Kay Dudman Co-ordinator 119 Coldershaw Road, Ealing, London W13 9DU Bookstall Manager Mrs. Margaret Cunnew 25 Selkirk Road, Twickenham, Middlesex TW2 6PS [email protected] Committee Members Claudette Durham, Dennis Marks, Joan Storkey Post Holders not on the Executive Committee Editor Mrs. Bridget Purr 8 Sandleford Lane, Greenham, Thatcham, Berks RG19 8XW [email protected] Projects Co-ordinator Brian Page 121 Shenley Avenue, Ruislip, Middlesex HA4 6BU Society Archivist Yvonne Masson Examiner Paul Kershaw Society Web site www.west-middlesex-fhs.org.uk Subscriptions All Categories: £12 per annum Subscription year 1 January to 31 December If you wish to contact any of the above people, please use the postal or email address shown. In all correspondence please mark your envelope WMFHS in the upper left-hand corner; if a reply is needed, a SAE must be enclosed. Members are asked to note that receipts are only sent by request, if return postage is included. Published by West Middlesex Family History Society Registered Charity No.
  • Observations on the Bourne Gutter 2014 Approx.)

    Observations on the Bourne Gutter 2014 Approx.)

    valley bottom from Bourne End to White Hill as valley gravels. Most likely these fluvial deposits are Late Devensian in age (26-12 ka Observations on the Bourne Gutter 2014 approx.). A synthesis of ideas and contemporary understanding of the hydrology in the area is detailed by Catt (2010, Chapter 9). In 2012 the summer was wet Nicholas Pierpoint and limited flow was observed in the Bourne Gutter from March The exceptionally high rainfall experienced in the flow in 2014, attempts to correlate local rainfall to April 2013. In the winter of southern England in the winter of 2014 has been data with corresponding flow periods, and for interest 2013/14 heavy rainfall resulted in well documented and described widely in the press. replicates some of the flow measurements documented full stream flow from the Banks For some in the Thames Valley this was traumatic. by Glennie (1960, 1962). Stream discharge data were Rise (SP 989051, Photo 1) all the However in west Hertfordshire it was interesting acquired using a Valeport Electromagnetic Flow Meter way to the confluence with the to see flow again in the Bourne Gutter, which flows at four stations. They were chosen to establish the flow River Bulbourne at Bourne End Photo 1. Banks Rise – pool/source of the Gutter. as a consequence of exceptional seasonal rainfall. contribution from Mounts Rise and identify if there (Photo 6). Chalk Rock is shown on Observational notes describing the extent of the flow was any contribution from the swallow-hole at Bottom the valley floor at Banks Rise on from 4 March to 23 April in 2013 were documented by Farm.
  • South West Hertfordshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    South West Hertfordshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment

    South West Hertfordshire Level 1 Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Final Report March 2019 www.jbaconsulting.com SWH Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Stage 1 i Fiona Hartland 8A Castle Street Wallingford Oxfordshire OX10 8DL Revision history Revision Amendments Issued to Ref/Date 2018s0161 SW Draft Report Three Rivers Hertfordshire District Council L1 SFRA v1.0 / Dacorum Borough 27/03/2018 Council St. Albans City and District Council Watford Borough Council Hertfordshire County Council Thames Water Canal and River Trust 2018s0161 SW Draft Report –DBC, SADC, Environment Hertfordshire TDC, WBC, CRT comments Agency L1 SFRA v2.0 / incorporated 20/03/2018 2018s0161 SW Final Draft Report – HCC Three Rivers Hertfordshire comments incorporated. District Council L1 SFRA v3.0 / Dacorum Borough 02/05/2018 Council St. Albans City and District Council Watford Borough Council Hertfordshire County Council Canal and River Trust 2018s0161 SW Final Report – Cumulative Three Rivers Hertfordshire Impacts Assessment District Council L1 SFRA v4.0 / (incorporating comments SWH Strategic Flood Risk Assessment Stage 1 i Revision Amendments Issued to Ref/Date from HCC and EA) and Dacorum Borough London Colney model Council outputs included St. Albans City and District Council Watford Borough Council Contract This report describes work commissioned by Claire May, on behalf of Three Rivers District Council, by an email dated 31 January 2018. Nathan Chapman, Emily Jones and Fiona Hartland of JBA Consulting carried out this work. Prepared by .............................
  • South Colne Sub-Area 3

    South Colne Sub-Area 3

    SOUTH COLNE DETAILED STRATEGIES SUB-AREA 3 South Colne character South Colne is characterised by flatter topography as the River Colne approaches its confluence with the Thames. Braided watercourses and flood meadows typify the landscape, which is dominated in aerial views by a series of large reservoirs, the product of historic gravel extraction industry in the area. The South West London Reservoirs are internationally significant for the populations of overwintering birds they support, some from as far afield as the Arctic. This area also includes Heathrow airport and the extensive associated transport infrastructure. In close proximity to the airport lie some significant heritage assets including Harmondsworth Barn, the largest timber- framed building in England. © Brian Robert Marshall CC Andreas Trepte, www.photo-natur.net Harmondsworth Barn River Colne flowing through Staines Moor Lakes and reservoirs important for SOUTH COLNE overwintering wildfowl DETAILED SUB-AREA 3 STRATEGIES © Stefan Czapski The Causeway at Staines Reservoir Ankerwycke Priory - home to the Ankerwycke Colne Brook at Wraysbury - important for Yew wildlife Colne & Crane valleys green infrastructure strategy 51 South Colne area strategy overview The strategy for South Colne and Heathrow associated opportunities for education and is to improve and repair the landscape and interpretation and new viewpoints. connectivity for people and wildlife, conserve INTERWOVEN RIVERS and enhance valuable ecological habitats and Water and biodiversity enhancements should aim promote access for all to new and improved to restore floodplains and focus on the benefits of RECREATION landscape destinations. natural landscapes to contribute to natural flood LOCAL + GLOBAL management in this low lying landscape. The Roads and other major infrastructure in this area Duke of Northumberland’s River and Longford WATER SPORTS create particular severance and impair the River close to Heathrow could be enhanced TRANSFORM quality of the user experience.
  • Heathrow Airport Expansion – Consultation Document

    Heathrow Airport Expansion – Consultation Document

    Page 1 HEATHROW AIRPORT EXPANSION – CONSULTATION DOCUMENT JUNE 2019 Page 2 Page 3 Table of contents page page page 1. Foreword 5 4. Construction 39 7. Managing the effects of expansion 71 4.1. Indicative construction programme 40 7.1. Air quality and odour 72 2. Introduction 6 Anticipated early works 40 7.2. Community 73 2.1. Heathrow today 6 DCO approval to runway opening 7.3. Health 74 (2021 to around 2026) 41 2.2. The background to Heathrow expansion 8 7.4. Noise 75 From runway opening (around 2026) 2.3. Our previous consultations 9 to approximately 115 mppa (around 2030) 42 7.5. Socio-economic and employment 80 2.4. This consultation 10 From approximately 115 mppa (around 2030) 7.6. Transport network users 81 to approximately 130 mppa (around 2035) 43 2.5. What happens next? 12 7.7. Biodiversity 82 From approximately 130 mppa (around 2035) to 7.8. Historic environment 83 approximately 142 mppa (around 2050) 44 3. Our Preferred Masterplan 14 7.9. Land quality 84 4.2. Construction and logistics management 45 3.1. Airfield 16 7.10. Landscape and visual impact 85 4.3. Managing the effects of construction 47 3.2. Terminals, satellites and aprons 18 7.11. Water environment 86 3.3. Roads and rail 20 5. Future operations 49 7.12. Carbon 88 3.4. Active travel 23 5.1. Runway alternation 51 7.13. Climate change 89 3.5. Water environment 24 5.2. Ban on scheduled night flights 56 7.14. Waste 90 3.6.
  • River Restoration and Chalk Streams

    River Restoration and Chalk Streams

    River Restoration and Chalk Streams Monday 22nd – Tuesday 23rd January 2001 University of Hertfordshire, College Lane, Hatfield AL10 9AB Organised by the River Restoration Centre in partnership with University of Hertfordshire Environment Agency, Thames Region Report compiled by: Vyv Wood-Gee Countryside Management Consultant Scabgill, Braehead, Lanark ML11 8HA Tel: 01555 870530 Fax: 01555 870050 E-mail: [email protected] Mobile: 07711 307980 ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 1 Seminar Proceedings CONTENTS Page no. Introduction 3 Discussion Session 1: Flow Restoration 4 Discussion Session 2: Habitat Restoration 7 Discussion Session 3: Scheme Selection 9 Discussion Session 4: Post Project Appraisal 15 Discussion Session 5: Project Practicalities 17 Discussion Session 6: BAPs, Research and Development 21 Discussion Session 7: Resource Management 23 Discussion Session 8: Chalk streams and wetlands 25 Discussion Session 9: Conclusions and information dissemination 27 Site visit notes 29 Appendix I: Delegate list 35 Appendix II: Feedback 36 Appendix III: RRC Project Information Pro-forma 38 Appendix IV: Project summaries and contact details – listed 41 alphabetically by project name. ____________________________________________________________________________ River Restoration and Chalk Streams Page 2 Seminar Proceedings INTRODUCTION Workshop Objectives · To facilitate and encourage interchange of information, views and experiences between people working with projects and programmes with strong links to chalk streams and activities or research that affect this environment. · To improve the knowledge base on the practicalities and associated benefits of chalk stream restoration work in order to make future investments more cost effective. Participants The workshop was specifically targeted at individuals and organisations whose activities, research or interests include a specific practical focus on chalk streams.
  • 0 Institute of Freshwater Ecology 2 610

    0 Institute of Freshwater Ecology 2 610

    Institute of Freshwater 0 Ecology C'1,741 2 610- MACROINVERTEBRATE SPECIES IDENTIFICATION - COLNE CATCHMENT Principal investigators: I D M Gunn BSc MSc CBiol MIBiol J H Blackburn BSc Report to The Environment Agency (Thames Region) - July 1997 . a . „.. - ,0 a...a- aP Ian % Natural Environment Research Council -NNW ISM- - Ma IMIMOMNII•1I•BIMIMI 1 1 1 Institute of Freshwater Ecology Edinburgh Laboratory, Bush Estate, Penicuik, Midlothian EH26 OQB, Scotland 1 Telephone 0131 445 4343; Fax 0131 445 3943 MACROINVERTEBRATESPECIES IDENTIFICATION - COLNE 1 CATCHMENT 1 1 Report to The Environment Agency (Thames Region) - July 1997 1 Principal.Investigators: I D M Gunn BSc MSc CBiolMIBiol 1 J H Blackburn BSc 1 TES Project No.: T04079a7 IFE Report No.: ED/T04079a711 1 Report use limitation In accordance with our normal practice, this report is for the sole use of the customer who contracted, in full or in part, the work reported here, and no responsibility is accepted to any third party for the whole or any part of the contents. Neither the whole nor any part of this report or any reference thereto may be included by a third party in any published document, circular or statement, nor published or referred to in any way without the form and context in which it appear being approved in writing by both the customer (or his representative) and the IFE. CONTENTS INTRODUCTION METHODS 2 2.1. Sample sorting 2 2.2. IvIacroinvertebrateidentification 2 2.3. Estimation of abundances 2 2.4. Threatened and rare taxa 3 RESULTS 4 LIST OF TAXONOMIC KEYS USED IN TAXA IDENTIFICATION 51 --- 0 WIMEMMMOM I.
  • Regional Flood Risk Assessment

    Regional Flood Risk Assessment

    London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal First Review August 2014 Contents Page Updating the January 2014 Consultation Draft 3 Executive Summary 4 Chapter 1 - Introduction 1.1 Wider Policy Background 5 1.2 The London Plan 6 1.3 The Sequential Test 8 1.4 How to use this RFRA 9 Chapter 2 - Overview of Flood Risk to London 2.1 Tidal Flood Risk 10 2.2 Fluvial Flood Risk 15 2.3 Surface Water Flood Risk 23 2.4 Foul Sewer Flood Risk 27 2.5 Groundwater Flood Risk 28 2.6 Reservoir Flood Risk 29 Chapter 3 – Spatial Implications of Flood Risk 3.1 Introduction 32 3.2 Specific Development Areas 33 3.3 Main Rail Network and Stations 47 3.4 London Underground & DLR Network 48 3.5 Main Road Network and Airports 49 3.6 Emergency Services 51 3.7 Schools 52 3.8 Utilities 53 3.9 Other Sites 55 Chapter 4 – Conclusions and Look Ahead 56 Appendix 1 List of Monitoring Recommendations 57 Appendix 2 Glossary 59 Appendix 3 Utility Infrastructure within Flood Risk Zones 60 Appendix 4 Comparison of Flood Risk Data with 2009 RFRA 66 Appendix 5 Flood Risk Maps Separate Document London Regional Flood Risk Appraisal – First Review – August 2014 page 2 of 66 Updating the January 2014 Consultation Draft This document represents an update of the draft, that was published in January 2014, in the light of a three-month consultation. Alongside further assistance by the Environment Agency, this final version of the First Review was also informed by responses the Mayor received from TfL as well as the London Boroughs of Richmond, Havering and Southwark (see Statement of Consultation provided separately).
  • COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE on the EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018

    COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE on the EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018

    COLNE VALLEY – LANDSCAPE ON THE EDGE Landscape Conservation Action Plan - March 2018 Chair of Landscape Partnership Lead Partner Colne Valley Park Community Interest Company Friends of the Colne Valley Park Spelthorne Natural History Society Front cover photo of Stockers Lake – Greg Townsend provide an essential project management tool for effective and efficient delivery. The partnership involved in preparing this LCAP considers it to be a compelling, innovative and realistic bid, with a range of projects which will connect people, biodiversity and access. ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ meets all the objectives of the Heritage Lottery Landscape The Landscape Partnership programme, run by the Heritage Lottery Partnership programme, with each of the projects proposed under the Fund, seeks to ‘conserve areas of distinctive landscape character’ and Scheme meeting at least one objective. promote a ‘holistic and balanced approach to the management of landscape heritage at a landscape scale’. Landscape Conservation Action Covering parts of Berkshire, Buckinghamshire, Greater London, Plans (LCAPs) required as part of this programme, provide the foundation Hertfordshire and Surrey, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’ will for planned work to benefit heritage, people and communities and are harness and stimulate organisations and communities across the area to needed in order to secure the Heritage Lottery Fund grant towards the support and sustain delivery. Residents and visitors will gain positive proposed work. perceptions about the area, will learn more about the landscape and feel more confident about exploring it. They will be supported to assist in Our LCAP, ‘Colne Valley – Landscape on the Edge’, comprises a suite of ‘shaping their place’, and feel more motivated to venture out and enjoy exciting projects (the Scheme), and seeks to: set these in the landscape the area, and to participate in efforts to improve and maintain it.