DOCSLIB.ORG

Supporting CS Education Via Virtualization and Packages

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Supporting CS Education Via Virtualization and Packages Supporting CS Education via Virtualization and Packages Tools for Successfully Accommodating “Bring-Your-Own-Device” at Scale Andy Sayler, Dirk Grunwald, John Black, Elizabeth White, and Matthew Monaco University of Colorado Boulder, CO, USA <first>.<last>@colorado.edu ABSTRACT 1. INTRODUCTION Higher education is facing a paradigm shift in the owner- BYOD (Bring Your Own Device) has quickly become the ship and use of computer hardware. The school computer buzzword du jour in many IT circles. The term refers to the lab is no longer the primary place of student computer use. increasing prevalence of employee-owned hardware in tradi- Instead, students increasingly expect to use their own hard- tionally corporate-owned IT settings. Higher education is ware to complete their school assignments. This creates a not immune to this trend. Increasingly, students show up to challenge for computer science educators: we must now sup- college with their own laptops and expect to complete all of port a wide range of heterogeneous hardware without the their required assignments on these machines. We have ob- benefits of tight control over its use. To address this \Bring- served many recent students graduating without ever having Your-Own-Device" (BYOD) challenge, we leverage virtual- entered a school-owned computer lab or worked on a school- ization and software packaging systems to gracefully deploy owned computer. This creates a challenge for educators and and support a standardized development environment for the IT departments that support them: how do we ensure all core CS courses across a range of both school-owned and that students can successfully complete assignments on their student-owned computing devices. We have deployed and own machines? How can we guarantee a good experience evaluated our system for the previous two years at scale and doing so? And how can we achieve both of these objectives continue to actively use and develop it. It has effectively while adhering to budgetary limits, without prohibitive in- helped us support multiple classes comprising hundreds of creases in support staff hours and overhead? students with very limited IT staffing. We describe the de- In computer science, the issue is exacerbated by the pre- sign and management of our system, present our experience dominance of unfamiliar (at least to incoming students) ap- using our system, and discuss the lessons we've learned. We plications and operating systems. Like many universities, also provide data reflecting current student user experience our institution primarily uses a UNIX-derived development with our system. Our system has proven very effective in environment (GNU/Linux). While a Linux development en- addressing the student BYOD challenge in a manageable, vironment has many advantages (discussed below), the fact cost-efficient, and easy-to-use manner. that most students arrive without Linux installed on their computers poses a significant challenge. It is a non-trivial Categories and Subject Descriptors task to ensure students can run Linux, complete with a pre- configured suite of versioned compilers, debuggers, and edi- K.3.2 [Computers and Education]: Computer and Infor- tors to ensure uniform results across student, instructor, and mation Science Education grader machines, on their own hardware. The problem could likely be solved with sufficient hu- General Terms man resources: if we paired each student with an expe- rienced CS practitioner to help them setup a dual-boot, Management, Economics, Human Factors properly-configured development environment on their ma- chine, we could likely deploy and support a uniform environ- Keywords ment across a range of hardware; this is in fact the method BYOD, Virtual Machines, Education, Development Envi- traditionally used in many educational computing environ- ronment, Package Management, Tools, Best Practices ments. But in the age of shrinking budgets, growing teaching loads, and a push toward MOOC courses that can scale to thousands and tens of thousands of students, such a brute Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or force approach is simply not feasible in most situations. classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed Instead, we have leveraged existing off-the-shelf virtualiza- for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation tion and software management systems to create a common on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the virtual machine that is used across all of our core computer author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or science courses. This system allows us to provide students republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission with an easily deployable solution that allows them to com- and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]. SIGCSE’14, March 5–8, 2014, Atlanta, GA, USA. plete all of their CS work on their own machines without Copyright is held by the owner/author(s). Publication rights licensed to ACM. forcing them to significantly modify their existing setups. ACM 978-1-4503-2605-6/14/03 ...$15.00. Our approach has allowed us to support over eight-hundred http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2538862.2538928. undergraduate students, many with little to no prior CS First, VirtualBox is a true multi-platform hypervisor pro- experience, for the cost of a single part-time graduate stu- viding a single unified platform for Windows, OSX, and dent appointment. The primary contributions of this paper Linux. Unlike other products such as HyperV, Parallels, or are twofold: We demonstrate how VMs can be deployed en VMWare, VirtualBox allows us to support a single piece of masse with minimal staffing to provide a single standardized software across all common student platforms, reducing the department-wide development environment across both VM burden of supporting a range of student hardware and op- and lab machines. We also show how using centralized soft- erating systems. Second, VirtualBox is both Free and Open ware management tools can simplify and streamline the dis- Source; students do not have to pay to use it, and they are tribution and maintenance of such a common development able to analyze or modify the source code if they wish. This environment. avoids requiring students or departments to purchase extra software and does not require students to install software 2. USING VIRTUAL MACHINES on their personal machines that they have no means to vet or modify. Finally, VirtualBox has solid support for Linux Leveraging virtualization technology to provide a uniform guests. This made it easy for us to configure our guest OS development environment in an educational setting is not a to interact with VirtualBox in a manner that ensures an op- new idea. At our institution, for example, individual fac- timal experience, allowing us to support functions like copy- ulty have used virtual machines (VMs) in classes for ≈ 7 ing between the VM and host system, sharing files between years. For example, VMs have long proven useful in com- systems, automatically scaling display resolutions, etc. puter security courses, both for use as servers that students Atop the hypervisor, we deploy a virtual machine based can practice attacking, as well as for use as clients that come on the Ubuntu 12.04.3 Desktop OS [6] (the latest Long Term pre-installed with the necessary security tools [15]. We have Support Ubuntu Linux release). We opted for a GNU/Linux- also used VMs since 2006 in a computer systems course to based development environment for its robust support for a enable new pedagogic techniques. VMs have also proven variety of CS tools and software, its widespread industry useful in topics such as robotics [7] and SaaS [8]. These ad- appeal, and its free, open, and permissive licensing. We hoc, per-course VM deployments have a several downsides: opted to use Ubuntu due to its large support base in the they require students to install a separate (and often large) Linux community. Ubuntu also has a rich library of soft- VM image for each course, they require a separate VM sup- ware packages, meaning that required software (i.e. ruby, port stack for each course, and they require students to learn scala, python, gcc, etc) would be available with little ad- simple tasks on multiple unfamiliar systems. ditional work. Ubuntu also provides a five-year supported 2.1 Our Requirements product life-cycle and is designed to be fairly user-friendly To improve upon this situation, we have pursued the de- for new Linux users. velopment a standard department-wide development envi- Our VM image starts as a standard Ubuntu 12.04.3 install. ronment. Our goal was simple: provide students with an We then configure it to work optimally on the average stu- easy to install and use development environment that they dent system. We use disk images that provide up to 30GB of could use across all their CS courses. The development en- VM HD space using a disk format that expands on demand vironment should be available both on department lab ma- to minimize actual disk use on student host systems. We chines, and as a VM for use on student-owned machines (e.g. configure the system to use up to 2GB of RAM and up to 2 as a \lab in a box"). Underlying this goal were a number of CPU cores by default. We make a few minor modifications expectations and requirements from various stakeholders in to the system configuration directly (i.e. setting the desk- the education environment. top background to an image that includes information for From the student perspective, our solution had to: a) Run using and getting help with the VM), but for the most part, on a range of host systems; b) Be easy to install; c) Be the majority of the post-install VM config is handled auto- easy to use and maintain; d) Minimize side-effects on the matically using a series of software meta-packages we have host system; e) Provide a stable experience throughout the created (described below).
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Understanding Full Virtualization, Paravirtualization, and Hardware Assist
    VMware Understanding Full Virtualization, Paravirtualization, and Hardware Assist Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................1 Overview of x86 Virtualization..................................................................................2 CPU Virtualization .......................................................................................................3 The Challenges of x86 Hardware Virtualization ...........................................................................................................3 Technique 1 - Full Virtualization using Binary Translation......................................................................................4 Technique 2 - OS Assisted Virtualization or Paravirtualization.............................................................................5 Technique 3 - Hardware Assisted Virtualization ..........................................................................................................6 Memory Virtualization................................................................................................6 Device and I/O Virtualization.....................................................................................7 Summarizing the Current State of x86 Virtualization Techniques......................8 Full Virtualization with Binary Translation is the Most Established Technology Today..........................8 Hardware Assist is the Future of Virtualization, but the Real Gains Have
    [Show full text]
  • Enabling Intel® Virtualization Technology Features and Benefits
    WHITE PAPER Intel® Virtualization Technology Enterprise Server Enabling Intel® Virtualization Technology Features and Benefits Maximizing the benefits of virtualization with Intel’s new CPUs and chipsets EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Although virtualization has been accepted in most data centers, some users have not yet taken advantage of all the virtualization features available to them. This white paper describes the features available in Intel® Virtualization Technology (Intel® VT) that work with Intel’s new CPUs and chipsets, showing how they can benefit the end user and how to enable them. Intel® Virtualization Technology Goldberg. Thus, developers found it difficult Feature Brief and Usage Model to implement a virtual machine platform on Intel VT combines with software-based the x86 architecture without significant virtualization solutions to provide maximum overhead on the host machine. system utilization by consolidating multiple environments into a single server or PC. In 2005 and 2006, Intel and AMD, working By abstracting the software away from the independently, each resolved this by creat- underlying hardware, a world of new usage ing new processor extensions to the x86 models opens up that can reduce costs, architecture. Although the actual implemen- increase management efficiency, and tation of processor extensions differs strengthen security—all while making your between AMD and Intel, both achieve the computing infrastructure more resilient in same goal of allowing a virtual machine the event of a disaster. hypervisor to run an unmodified operating system without incurring significant emula- During the last four years, Intel has intro- tion performance penalties. duced several new features to Intel VT. Most of these features are well known, but others Intel VT is Intel’s hardware virtualization for may not be.
    [Show full text]
  • PCI DSS Virtualization Guidelines
    Standard: PCI Data Security Standard (PCI DSS) Version: 2.0 Date: June 2011 Author: Virtualization Special Interest Group PCI Security Standards Council Information Supplement: PCI DSS Virtualization Guidelines Information Supplement • PCI DSS Virtualization Guidelines • June 2011 Table of Contents 1 Introduction ....................................................................................................................... 3 1.1 Audience ................................................................................................................ 3 1.2 Intended Use .......................................................................................................... 4 2 Virtualization Overview .................................................................................................... 5 2.1 Virtualization Concepts and Classes ..................................................................... 5 2.2 Virtual System Components and Scoping Guidance ............................................. 7 3 Risks for Virtualized Environments .............................................................................. 10 3.1 Vulnerabilities in the Physical Environment Apply in a Virtual Environment ....... 10 3.2 Hypervisor Creates New Attack Surface ............................................................. 10 3.3 Increased Complexity of Virtualized Systems and Networks .............................. 11 3.4 More Than One Function per Physical System ................................................... 11 3.5 Mixing VMs of
    [Show full text]
  • Virtualization and Shared Infrastructure Data Storage for IT in Kosovo Institutions Gani Zogaj
    Rochester Institute of Technology RIT Scholar Works Theses Thesis/Dissertation Collections 2012 Virtualization and shared Infrastructure data storage for IT in Kosovo institutions Gani Zogaj Follow this and additional works at: http://scholarworks.rit.edu/theses Recommended Citation Zogaj, Gani, "Virtualization and shared Infrastructure data storage for IT in Kosovo institutions" (2012). Thesis. Rochester Institute of Technology. Accessed from This Master's Project is brought to you for free and open access by the Thesis/Dissertation Collections at RIT Scholar Works. It has been accepted for inclusion in Theses by an authorized administrator of RIT Scholar Works. For more information, please contact [email protected]. AMERICAN UNIVERSITY IN KOSOVO MASTER OF SCIENCE IN PROFESSIONAL STUDIES Virtualization and Shared Infrastructure Data Storage for IT in Kosovo institutions “Submitted as a Capstone Project Report in partial fulfillment of a Master of Science degree in Professional Studies at American University in Kosovo” By Gani ZOGAJ November, 2012 Virtualization and Shared Infrastructure Data Storage for IT in Kosovo institutions ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First, I would like to thank God for giving me health for completing my Master’s Degree studies. I would like to express my gratitude to my supervisor of capstone proposal, Bryan, for his support and for giving me suggestions and recommendations throughout the Capstone Project work. Finally, I would like to thank my wife, Shkendije, and my lovely daughters, Elisa and Erona, who I love so much, for their understanding while I was preparing the Capstone Project and I couldn’t spend enough time with them. 2 Virtualization and Shared Infrastructure Data Storage for IT in Kosovo institutions Table of Contents Figures and Tables………………………………………………….……………….……….……5 List of Acronyms………………………………………………………………....………….……6 Executive Summary……………………………………………………..………………...………8 Chapter 1…………………………………………………………………………...…………….11 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Oracle® Linux Virtualization Manager Getting Started Guide
    Oracle® Linux Virtualization Manager Getting Started Guide F25124-11 September 2021 Oracle Legal Notices Copyright © 2019, 2021 Oracle and/or its affiliates. This software and related documentation are provided under a license agreement containing restrictions on use and disclosure and are protected by intellectual property laws. Except as expressly permitted in your license agreement or allowed by law, you may not use, copy, reproduce, translate, broadcast, modify, license, transmit, distribute, exhibit, perform, publish, or display any part, in any form, or by any means. Reverse engineering, disassembly, or decompilation of this software, unless required by law for interoperability, is prohibited. The information contained herein is subject to change without notice and is not warranted to be error-free. If you find any errors, please report them to us in writing. If this is software or related documentation that is delivered to the U.S. Government or anyone licensing it on behalf of the U.S. Government, then the following notice is applicable: U.S. GOVERNMENT END USERS: Oracle programs (including any operating system, integrated software, any programs embedded, installed or activated on delivered hardware, and modifications of such programs) and Oracle computer documentation or other Oracle data delivered to or accessed by U.S. Government end users are "commercial computer software" or "commercial computer software documentation" pursuant to the applicable Federal Acquisition Regulation and agency-specific supplemental regulations. As such, the use, reproduction, duplication, release, display, disclosure, modification, preparation of derivative works, and/or adaptation of i) Oracle programs (including any operating system, integrated software, any programs embedded, installed or activated on delivered hardware, and modifications of such programs), ii) Oracle computer documentation and/or iii) other Oracle data, is subject to the rights and limitations specified in the license contained in the applicable contract.
    [Show full text]
  • Firecracker: Lightweight Virtualization for Serverless Applications
    Firecracker: Lightweight Virtualization for Serverless Applications Alexandru Agache, Marc Brooker, Andreea Florescu, Alexandra Iordache, Anthony Liguori, Rolf Neugebauer, Phil Piwonka, and Diana-Maria Popa, Amazon Web Services https://www.usenix.org/conference/nsdi20/presentation/agache This paper is included in the Proceedings of the 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’20) February 25–27, 2020 • Santa Clara, CA, USA 978-1-939133-13-7 Open access to the Proceedings of the 17th USENIX Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (NSDI ’20) is sponsored by Firecracker: Lightweight Virtualization for Serverless Applications Alexandru Agache Marc Brooker Andreea Florescu Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services Alexandra Iordache Anthony Liguori Rolf Neugebauer Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services Phil Piwonka Diana-Maria Popa Amazon Web Services Amazon Web Services Abstract vantage over traditional server provisioning processes: mul- titenancy allows servers to be shared across a large num- Serverless containers and functions are widely used for de- ber of workloads, and the ability to provision new func- ploying and managing software in the cloud. Their popularity tions and containers in milliseconds allows capacity to be is due to reduced cost of operations, improved utilization of switched between workloads quickly as demand changes. hardware, and faster scaling than traditional deployment meth- Serverless is also attracting the attention of the research com- ods. The economics and scale of serverless applications de- munity [21,26,27,44,47], including work on scaling out video mand that workloads from multiple customers run on the same encoding [13], linear algebra [20, 53] and parallel compila- hardware with minimal overhead, while preserving strong se- tion [12].
    [Show full text]
  • Reference Architecture: Lenovo Client Virtualization (LCV) with Thinksystem Servers
    Reference Architecture: Lenovo Client Virtualization (LCV) with ThinkSystem Servers Last update: 10 June 2019 Version 1.3 Base Reference Architecture Describes Lenovo clients, document for all LCV servers, storage, and networking solutions hardware used in LCV solutions LCV covers both virtual Contains system performance desktops and hosted considerations and performance desktops testing methodology and tools Mike Perks Pawan Sharma Table of Contents 1 Introduction ............................................................................................... 1 2 Business problem and business value ................................................... 2 3 Requirements ............................................................................................ 3 4 Architectural overview ............................................................................. 6 5 Component model .................................................................................... 7 5.1 Management services ............................................................................................ 10 5.2 Support services .................................................................................................... 11 5.2.1 Lenovo Thin Client Manager ...................................................................................................... 11 5.2.2 Chromebook management console ........................................................................................... 12 5.3 Storage .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Paravirtualization (PV)
    Full and Para Virtualization Dr. Sanjay P. Ahuja, Ph.D. Fidelity National Financial Distinguished Professor of CIS School of Computing, UNF x86 Hardware Virtualization The x86 architecture offers four levels of privilege known as Ring 0, 1, 2 and 3 to operating systems and applications to manage access to the computer hardware. While user level applications typically run in Ring 3, the operating system needs to have direct access to the memory and hardware and must execute its privileged instructions in Ring 0. x86 privilege level architecture without virtualization Technique 1: Full Virtualization using Binary Translation This approach relies on binary translation to trap (into the VMM) and to virtualize certain sensitive and non-virtualizable instructions with new sequences of instructions that have the intended effect on the virtual hardware. Meanwhile, user level code is directly executed on the processor for high performance virtualization. Binary translation approach to x86 virtualization Full Virtualization using Binary Translation This combination of binary translation and direct execution provides Full Virtualization as the guest OS is completely decoupled from the underlying hardware by the virtualization layer. The guest OS is not aware it is being virtualized and requires no modification. The hypervisor translates all operating system instructions at run-time on the fly and caches the results for future use, while user level instructions run unmodified at native speed. VMware’s virtualization products such as VMWare ESXi and Microsoft Virtual Server are examples of full virtualization. Full Virtualization using Binary Translation The performance of full virtualization may not be ideal because it involves binary translation at run-time which is time consuming and can incur a large performance overhead.
    [Show full text]
  • Red Hat Virtualization 4.3 Planning and Prerequisites Guide
    Red Hat Virtualization 4.3 Planning and Prerequisites Guide Planning for the Installation and Configuration of Red Hat Virtualization 4.3 Last Updated: 2019-05-09 Red Hat Virtualization 4.3 Planning and Prerequisites Guide Planning for the Installation and Configuration of Red Hat Virtualization 4.3 Red Hat Virtualization Documentation Team Red Hat Customer Content Services [email protected] Legal Notice Copyright © 2019 Red Hat, Inc. The text of and illustrations in this document are licensed by Red Hat under a Creative Commons Attribution–Share Alike 3.0 Unported license ("CC-BY-SA"). An explanation of CC-BY-SA is available at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/ . In accordance with CC-BY-SA, if you distribute this document or an adaptation of it, you must provide the URL for the original version. Red Hat, as the licensor of this document, waives the right to enforce, and agrees not to assert, Section 4d of CC-BY-SA to the fullest extent permitted by applicable law. Red Hat, Red Hat Enterprise Linux, the Shadowman logo, JBoss, OpenShift, Fedora, the Infinity logo, and RHCE are trademarks of Red Hat, Inc., registered in the United States and other countries. Linux ® is the registered trademark of Linus Torvalds in the United States and other countries. Java ® is a registered trademark of Oracle and/or its affiliates. XFS ® is a trademark of Silicon Graphics International Corp. or its subsidiaries in the United States and/or other countries. MySQL ® is a registered trademark of MySQL AB in the United States, the European Union and other countries.
    [Show full text]
  • IT Modernization with Nutanix – a Cloud-Smart Approach
    SOLUTION BRIEF IT Modernization with Nutanix - A Cloud- Smart Approach Nutanix simplifies legacy IT infrastructure while simultaneously enabling IT-as-a-Service by providing the secure and intelligent automation capabilities cloud-based datacenter architectures require THE BUSINESS VALUE Federal agencies are increasingly being asked to spend less time on infrastructure OF NUTANIX and allocate more time and budget to application services that add business value. Despite a continuous stream of IT hardware and software enhancements, • 60% lower cost of operations the infrastructure challenges and costs faced by agencies continue to rise. • 39% lower IT infrastructure costs Traditional IT infrastructure and virtualization software required to meet agency needs are complex and expensive, and datacenter management has become • 534% 5-year ROI painful. Far too much time, effort, and budget are focused on just keeping the • 61% more IT staff efficiencies lights on and the ability to support an agile continuous development environment with no downtime is not possible today. • 7 month payback Today, IT is distributed. There’s no longer just one cloud. Business applications run • 97% fewer outages in private, public, and distributed clouds. But with many clouds, come many • 73% less staff time to deploy silos–different management tools, infrastructure technologies, and consumption compute resources models – all of which make IT more complex. • 68% less staff time to deploy Legacy infrastructure—with separate silos of proprietary hardware-based servers, storage resources storage, storage networks, and virtualization—is not well suited to meet the growing demand or agility needed to service cloud or numerous enterprise workloads including virtualized, bare metal, container-based, DevSecOps automation use cases, or hybrid cloud architectures.
    [Show full text]
  • Malware Collection and Analysis Via Hardware Virtualization Tamas K
    University of Connecticut OpenCommons@UConn Doctoral Dissertations University of Connecticut Graduate School 12-1-2015 Malware Collection and Analysis via Hardware Virtualization Tamas K. Lengyel [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations Recommended Citation Lengyel, Tamas K., "Malware Collection and Analysis via Hardware Virtualization" (2015). Doctoral Dissertations. 964. https://opencommons.uconn.edu/dissertations/964 Malware Collection and Analysis via Hardware Virtualization Tamas Kristof Lengyel University of Connecticut 2015 Abstract Malware is one of the biggest security threat today and deploying effective defen- sive solutions requires the collection and rapid analysis of a continuously increasing number of samples. The collection and analysis is greatly complicated by the pro- liferation of metamorphic malware as the efficacy of signature-based static analysis systems is greatly reduced. While honeypots and dynamic malware analysis has been effectively deployed to combat the problem, significant challenges remain. The rapidly increasing number of malware samples poses a particular challenge as it greatly inflates the cost of the hardware required to process the influx. As modern malware also deploys anti-debugging and obfuscation techniques, the time it takes to formulate effective solutions is further exacerbated. There is a clear need for effective scalability in automated malware collection and analysis. At the same time, modern malware can both detect the monitoring environment and hide in unmonitored corners of the system. It has also been observed that mal- ware modifies its run-time behavior to lead the analysis system astray when it detects a monitoring environment. Consequently, it is critical to create a stealthy environment to hide the presence of the data collection from the external attacker.
    [Show full text]
  • BEST PRACTICES for DATA CENTRE VIRTUALIZATION (ITSP.70.010) March 2020
    UNCLASSIFIED CYBER CENTRE DATA CENTRE VIRTUALIZATION REPORT: BEST PRACTICES FOR DATA CENTRE VIRTUALIZATION (ITSP.70.010) March 2020 PRACTITIONER TLP:WHITE 1 ITSP.70.010 UNCLASSIFIED FOREWORD ITSP.70.010 Cyber Centre Data Centre Virtualization Report: Best Practices for Data Centre Virtualization is an UNCLASSIFIED publication, issued under the authority of the Head, Canadian Centre for Cyber Security (Cyber Centre). For more information, email or phone our Contact Centre: Cyber Centre Contact Centre [email protected] 613-949-7048 or 1-833-CYBER-88 EFFECTIVE DATE This publication takes effect on (03/27/2020). REVISION HISTORY Revision Amendments Date 1 First release. March 27, 2020 2 ITSP.70.010 UNCLASSIFIED OVERVIEW To improve efficiency and streamline operations, many organizations are virtualizing their data centres. However, some are doing so without a proper understanding of the security implications of their decisions on the overall security posture of the data centre. By increasing their consolidation ratios (i.e. the number of virtual machines that can operate on each physical host machine), many organizations may unintentionally compromise their network security architecture. Moreover, any attempt to replace many of the physical isolation mechanisms with logical equivalents may introduce unacceptable risk into their network architecture. Not only are virtualized data centres (VDCs) susceptible to most of the vulnerabilities inherent in traditional data centres, but they introduce new vulnerabilities specific to this environment. While complex virtualization threats (e.g. System Management Mode (SMM) rootkits, side-channel attacks, and hyperjacking) must be addressed, it is the more practical threats that are of greater risk to the VDC.
    [Show full text]