DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Does the Cloud Spin? the Coriolis Effect

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Does the Cloud Spin? the Coriolis Effect Origin of the Solar System The Solar Nebula Our theory must explain the data • The nebular theory holds that our Solar System formed out 1. Large bodies in the Solar System have of a nebula which collapsed orderly motions. under its own gravity. 2. There are two types of planets. • observational evidence – small, rocky terrestrial planets – We observe stars in the process of forming today. – large, hydrogen-rich Jovian planets – The are always found within 3. Asteroids & comets exist in certain regions interstellar clouds of gas. of the Solar System – This image shows the Orion solar nebula – name given to Nebula..newborn solar the cloud of gas from which our 4. There are exceptions to these patterns. systems within! own Solar System formed Gravitational Collapse Flattening of the Solar Nebula • As the nebula collapses, clumps of gas collide & merge. • The solar nebular was initially somewhat spherical and a few light years in diameter. • Their random velocities average out into the nebula’s –very cold direction of rotation. – rotating slightly • The spinning nebula assumes the shape of a disk. • It was given a “push” by some event. – perhaps the shock wave from a nearby supernova • As the nebula shrank, gravity increased, causing collapse. • As the nebula “falls” inward, gravitational potential energy is converted to heat. – Conservation of Energy • As the nebula’s radius decreases, it rotates faster – Conservation of Angular Momentum – See: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AQLtcEAG9v0 for an example of how this works! The Coriolis effect Why does the cloud spin? • Air moves fastest at the equator due to the Earths Spin • Its part of a spinning galaxy—lots of angular momentum avaialble • Particles closer to the center of galaxy move more rapily than particles farther away..speed decreases with radial distance. • As a shock wave and then gravity compress the cloud, angular momentum must be conserved, so toques transfer some angular momentum from the galactic disk to the interstellar cloud. • This is similar to the formation of cyclones and • As temp differences causes air currents to move hurricanes in our atmosphere. North south, the result is a whilpool of air 1 Rotating disk with collapsing cloud Rotating disk with collapsing cloud Centripital force (gravity) makes particles orbit center Imagine disk of Galaxy seen from above of cloud, while cloud orbits center of galaxy. Note: Particles on outside rotate more slowly about galactic Speed decreases With radial center distance Stars on inside rotate more rapidly Collisions occur Faster particles will win! Disk begins to swirl! Stars in Galaxy orbit about center of galaxy Collapse of the Solar Nebula Orderly Motions in the Solar System • The Sun formed in the very center of the nebula. – temperature & density were high enough for nuclear fusion reactions to begin • The planets formed in the rest of the disk. • This would explain the following: – all planets lie along one plane (in the disk) – all planets orbit in one direction (the spin direction of the disk) – the Sun rotates in the same direction – the planets would tend to rotate in this same direction – most moons orbit in this direction – most planetary orbits are near circular (collisions in the disk) More Support for the Nebular Theory Building the Planets • We have observed disks around other stars. Condensation – elements & compounds began to • These could be new planetary systems in formation. condense (i.e. solidify) out of the nebula…. depending on temperature! Imagine atoms and molecules coming together atom by β Pictoris atom—electric force and ionization is main mechanism AB Aurigae Proto-Solar systems in the Orion Nebula! 2 Building the Planets …and temperature in the Solar nebula The Young Sun emitted pulses of depended on distance from the Sun! UV and X-rays • These photons ionized some atoms in the solar nebula and deposited charge on others • These made the atoms and molecules “sticky” • Try to slide down a plastic slide on a dry, sunny day. Your hair will stand up! Building the Planets Building the Planets So only rocks & metals condensed within 3.5 AU accretion -- larger bits stick to one another. Since gravity of the Sun… the so-called frost line. is weak,...acretion is mostly a gravitational effect between Hydrogen compounds (ices) condensed beyond the objects much larger than dust frost line. grains…basically..macroscopic objects attracting one another via law of gravity. Building the Planets Acretion continues today! …After condensation produces macrosopic objects These will: • combine near the Sun to form rocky planets • combine beyond the frostline to form icy planetesimals which… • capture H/He far from Sun to form gas planets 3 Building the Planets Building the Planets • Each gas (Jovian) planet formed its own “miniature” solar wind --- charged particles streaming out from solar nebula. the Sun cleared away the leftover gas—this might be • Moons formed out of the disk. a relatively rare event! Other solar systems show evidence that their nebulae weren’t cleared out! Origin of the Asteroids Origin of the Comets • The Solar wind cleared the leftover gas, but not the • The leftover icy leftover planetesimals. planetesimals are the • Those leftover rocky planetesimals which did not present-day comets. accrete onto a planet are the present-day asteroids. • Those which were located between the • Most inhabit the asteroid belt between Mars & Jupiter. Jovian planets, if not – Jupiter’s gravity prevented a planet from forming there. captured, were gravitationally flung in all directions into the Oort cloud. • Those beyond Neptune’s orbit remained in the ecliptic The nebular theory predicted the existence plane in what we call of the Kuiper belt 40 years before it was the Kuiper belt. discovered! Exceptions to the Rules Exceptions to the Rules So how does the nebular theory deal with exceptions, Close encounters with and impacts by planetesimals could explain: i.e. data which do not fit the model’s predictions? • Why some moons orbit opposite their planet’s rotation – captured moons (e.g. Triton) • Why rotation axes of some planets are tilted – impacts “knock them over” (extreme example: Uranus) • There were many more leftover planetesimals than we • Why some planets rotate more quickly than others see today. – impacts “spin them up” • Most of them collided with the newly-formed planets • Why Earth is the only terrestrial planet with a large & moons during the first few 108 years of the Solar Moon System. – giant impact • We call this the heavy bombardment period. 4 Formation of Moon Formation of the Moon (Giant Impact Theory) • The Earth was struck by a Mars-sized planetesimal • A part of Earth’s mantle was ejected • This coalesced in the Moon. – it orbits in same direction as Earth rotates – lower density than Earth See: move at: – Earth was “spun up” http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvc7Wf1xj4c& (illustration from Joe Tucciarone feature=fvw And also: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibV4MdN5wo 0&feature=related Radiometric Dating How Old is the Solar System? • Isotopes which are unstable are said to be radioactive. • They spontaneously change in to another isotope in a process • How do we measure the age of a rock? called radioactive decay. – protons convert to neutrons • How old is the Solar System and how do we – neutrons convert to protons know? • The time it takes half the amount of a radioactive isotope to decay is called its half life. • By knowing rock chemistry, we chose a stable isotope which does not form with the rock…its presence is due solely to decay. • Measuring the relative amounts of the two isotopes and knowing the half life of the radioactive isotope tells us the age of the rock. The Age of our Solar System • Radiometric dating can only measure the age of a rock since it solidified. • Geologic processes on Earth cause rock to melt and resolidify. ⇒ Earth rocks can’t be used to measure the Solar System’s age. • We must find rocks which have not melted or vaporized since the condensed from the Solar nebula. – meteorites imply an age of 4.6 billion years for Solar System – This value is consistent with the age of the oldest moon rocks (4.4 billion years) • Radioactive isotopes are formed in stars & supernovae – suggests that Solar System formation was triggered by supernova – short half lives suggest the supernova was nearby 5.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Perspective in Search of Planets and Life Around Other Stars
    Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA Vol. 96, pp. 5353–5355, May 1999 Perspective In search of planets and life around other stars Jonathan I. Lunine* Reparto di Planetologia, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche, Istituto di Astrofisica Spaziale, Rome I-00133, Italy The discovery of over a dozen low-mass companions to nearby stars has intensified scientific and public interest in a longer term search for habitable planets like our own. However, the nature of the detected companions, and in particular whether they resemble Jupiter in properties and origin, remains undetermined. The first detection of a planet orbiting around another star like Table 1. Jovian-mass planets around main-sequence stars our Sun came in 1995, after decades of null results and false Star’s Semi-major Period, alarms. As of this writing, 18 objects have been found with masses Star mass axis, AU days Eccentricity* Mass† potentially less than 12 times that of Jupiter, but none less than 40% of Jupiter’s mass, around main-sequence stars (1) (see Table HD187123 1.00 0.042 3.097 0.03 0.57 1). In addition, several planetary-mass bodies have been detected HD75289 1.05 0.046 3.5097 0.00 0.42 orbiting pulsars. Although these are interesting as well, the exotic Tau Boo 1.20 0.047 3.3126 0.00 3.66 environments around neutron stars make it unlikely that their 51 Peg 0.98 0.051 4.2308 0.01 0.44 companions are abodes for life. It is the success in finding planets Ups And 1.10 0.054 4.62 0.15 0.61 around Sun-like stars that provides a technological stepping stone HD217107 0.96 0.072 7.11 0.14 1.28 ‡ to one of the great aspirations of humanity: to find a world like 55 Cnc 0.90 0.110 14.656 0.04 1.5–3 the Earth orbiting around a distant star.
    [Show full text]
  • What Lies Immediately Outside of the Heliosphere in the Very Local Interstellar Medium (VLISM): What Will ISP Detect?
    EPSC Abstracts Vol. 14, EPSC2020-68, 2020 https://doi.org/10.5194/epsc2020-68 Europlanet Science Congress 2020 © Author(s) 2021. This work is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. What lies immediately outside of the heliosphere in the very local interstellar medium (VLISM): What will ISP detect? Jeffrey Linsky1 and Seth Redfield2 1University of Colorado, JILA, Boulder CO, United States of America ([email protected]) 2Wesleyan University, Astronomy Department, Middletown CT, United States of America ([email protected]) The Interstellar Probe (ISP) will provide the first direct measurements of interstellar gas and dust when it travels far beyond the heliopause where the solar wind no longer influences the ambient medium. We summarize in this presentation what we have been learning about the VLISM from 20 years of remote observations with the high-resolution spectrographs on the Hubble Space Telescope. Radial velocity measurements of interstellar absorption lines seen in the lines of sight to nearby stars allow us to measure the kinematics of gas flows in the VLISM. We find that the heliosphere is passing through a cluster of warm partially ionized interstellar clouds. The heliosphere is now at the edge of the Local Interstellar Cloud (LIC) and heading in the direction of the slighly cooler G cloud. Two other warm clouds (Blue and Aql) are very close to the heliosphere. We find that there is a large region of the sky with very low neutral hydrogen column density, which we call the hydrogen hole. In the direction of the hydrogen hole is the brightest photoionizing source, the star Epsilon Canis Majoris (CMa).
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstellar Medium
    The Interstellar Medium http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM • Total mass ~ 5 to 10 x 109 solar masses of about 5 – 10% of the mass of the Milky Way Galaxy interior to the suns orbit • Average density overall about 0.5 atoms/cm3 or ~10-24 g cm-3, but large variations are seen • Composition - essentially the same as the surfaces of Population I stars, but the gas may be ionized, neutral, or in molecules (or dust) H I – neutral atomic hydrogen H2 - molecular hydrogen H II – ionized hydrogen He I – neutral helium Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, dust, molecules, etc. THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM • Energy input – starlight (especially O and B), supernovae, cosmic rays • Cooling – line radiation and infrared radiation from dust • Largely concentrated (in our Galaxy) in the disk Evolution in the ISM of the Galaxy Stellar winds Planetary Nebulae Supernovae + Circulation Stellar burial ground The The Stars Interstellar Big Medium Galaxy Bang Formation White Dwarfs Neutron stars Black holes Star Formation As a result the ISM is continually stirred, heated, and cooled – a dynamic environment And its composition evolves: 0.02 Total fraction of heavy elements Total 10 billion Time years THE LOCAL BUBBLE http://www.daviddarling.info/encyclopedia/L/Local_Bubble.html The “Local Bubble” is a region of low density (~0.05 cm-3 and Loop I bubble high temperature (~106 K) 600 ly has been inflated by numerous supernova explosions. It is Galactic Center about 300 light years long and 300 ly peanut-shaped. Its smallest dimension is in the plane of the Milky Way Galaxy.
    [Show full text]
  • Size and Scale Attendance Quiz II
    Size and Scale Attendance Quiz II Are you here today? Here! (a) yes (b) no (c) are we still here? Today’s Topics • “How do we know?” exercise • Size and Scale • What is the Universe made of? • How big are these things? • How do they compare to each other? • How can we organize objects to make sense of them? What is the Universe made of? Stars • Stars make up the vast majority of the visible mass of the Universe • A star is a large, glowing ball of gas that generates heat and light through nuclear fusion • Our Sun is a star Planets • According to the IAU, a planet is an object that 1. orbits a star 2. has sufficient self-gravity to make it round 3. has a mass below the minimum mass to trigger nuclear fusion 4. has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit • A dwarf planet (such as Pluto) fulfills all these definitions except 4 • Planets shine by reflected light • Planets may be rocky, icy, or gaseous in composition. Moons, Asteroids, and Comets • Moons (or satellites) are objects that orbit a planet • An asteroid is a relatively small and rocky object that orbits a star • A comet is a relatively small and icy object that orbits a star Solar (Star) System • A solar (star) system consists of a star and all the material that orbits it, including its planets and their moons Star Clusters • Most stars are found in clusters; there are two main types • Open clusters consist of a few thousand stars and are young (1-10 million years old) • Globular clusters are denser collections of 10s-100s of thousand stars, and are older (10-14 billion years
    [Show full text]
  • Arxiv:1910.06396V4 [Physics.Pop-Ph] 12 Jun 2021 ∗ Rmtv Ieeitdi H R-Oa Eua(Vni H C System)
    Nebula-Relay Hypothesis: Primitive Life in Nebula and Origin of Life on Earth Lei Feng1,2, ∗ 1Key Laboratory of Dark Matter and Space Astronomy, Purple Mountain Observatory, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Nanjing 210023 2Joint Center for Particle, Nuclear Physics and Cosmology, Nanjing University – Purple Mountain Observatory, Nanjing 210093, China Abstract A modified version of panspermia theory, named Nebula-Relay hypothesis or local panspermia, is introduced to explain the origin of life on Earth. Primitive life, acting as the seeds of life on Earth, originated at pre-solar epoch through physicochemical processes and then filled in the pre- solar nebula after the death of pre-solar star. Then the history of life on the Earth can be divided into three epochs: the formation of primitive life in the pre-solar epoch; pre-solar nebula epoch; the formation of solar system and the Earth age of life. The main prediction of our model is that primitive life existed in the pre-solar nebula (even in the current nebulas) and the celestial body formed therein (i.e. solar system). arXiv:1910.06396v4 [physics.pop-ph] 12 Jun 2021 ∗Electronic address: [email protected] 1 I. INTRODUCTION Generally speaking, there are several types of models to interpret the origin of life on Earth. The two most persuasive and popular models are the abiogenesis [1, 2] and pansper- mia theory [3]. The modern version of abiogenesis is also known as chemical origin theory introduced by Oparin in the 1920s [1], and Haldane proposed a similar theory independently [2] at almost the same time. In this theory, the organic compounds are naturally produced from inorganic matters through physicochemical processes and then reassembled into much more complex living creatures.
    [Show full text]
  • A Review of Local Interstellar Medium Properties of Relevance for Space Missions to the Nearest Stars
    Project Icarus: A Review of Local Interstellar Medium Properties of Relevance for Space Missions to the Nearest Stars (Accepted for publication in Acta Astronautica) Ian A. Crawford* Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences, Birkbeck College, University of London, Malet Street, London, WC1E 7HX, UK *Tel: +44 207 679 3431; Email: [email protected] Abstract I review those properties of the interstellar medium within 15 light-years of the Sun which will be relevant for the planning of future rapid (v ≥ 0.1c) interstellar space missions to the nearest stars. As the detailed properties of the local interstellar medium (LISM) may only become apparent after interstellar probes have been able to make in situ measurements, the first such probes will have to be designed conservatively with respect to what can be learned about the LISM from the immediate environment of the Solar System. It follows that studies of interstellar vehicles should assume the lowest plausible density when considering braking devices which rely on transferring momentum from the vehicle to the surrounding medium, but the highest plausible densities when considering possible damage caused by impact of the vehicle with interstellar material. Some suggestions for working values of these parameters are provided. This paper is a submission of the Project Icarus Study Group. Keywords: Interstellar medium; Interstellar travel 1 Introduction The growing realisation that planets are common companions of stars [1,2] has reinvigorated astronautical studies of how they might be explored using interstellar space probes. The history of Solar System exploration to-date shows us that spacecraft are required for the detailed study of planets, and it seems clear that we will eventually require spacecraft to make in situ studies of other planetary systems as well.
    [Show full text]
  • THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM (ISM) • Total Mass ~ 5 to 10 X 109 Solar Masses of About 5 – 10% of the Mass of the Milky Way Galaxy Interior to the SunS Orbit
    THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM (ISM) • Total mass ~ 5 to 10 x 109 solar masses of about 5 – 10% of the mass of the Milky Way Galaxy interior to the suns orbit • Average density overall about 0.5 atoms/cm3 or ~10-24 g cm-3, but large variations are seen The Interstellar Medium • Elemental Composition - essentially the same as the surfaces of Population I stars, but the gas may be ionized, neutral, or in molecules or dust. H I – neutral atomic hydrogen http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/astropix.html H2 - molecular hydrogen H II – ionized hydrogen He I – neutral helium Carbon, nitrogen, oxygen, dust, molecules, etc. THE INTERSTELLAR MEDIUM • Energy input – starlight (especially O and B), supernovae, cosmic rays • Cooling – line radiation from atoms and molecules and infrared radiation from dust • Largely concentrated (in our Galaxy) in the disk Evolution in the ISM of the Galaxy As a result the ISM is continually stirred, heated, and cooled – a dynamic environment, a bit like the Stellar winds earth’s atmosphere but more so because not gravitationally Planetary Nebulae confined Supernovae + Circulation And its composition evolves as the products of stellar evolution are mixed back in by stellar winds, supernovae, etc.: Stellar burial ground metal content The The 0.02 Stars Interstellar Big Medium Galaxy Bang Formation star formation White Dwarfs and Collisions Neutron stars Black holes of heavy elements fraction Total Star Formation 10 billion Time years The interstellar medium (hereafter ISM) was first discovered in 1904, with the observation of stationary calcium absorption lines superimposed on the Doppler shifting spectrum of a spectroscopic binary.
    [Show full text]
  • "THE GENERAL THEORY of META-DYNAMICS SYSTEMICITY" Part Four: Early Earth and Origin of Life’S Metadynamics Systemicity
    "THE GENERAL THEORY OF META-DYNAMICS SYSTEMICITY" Part four: Early Earth and origin of Life’s metadynamics systemicity Jean-Jacques BLANC Consulting Engineer Crets de Champel, 9 CH - 1206 – Geneva, Switzerland Tel/fax: +41(22)346 30 48 E-mail: [email protected] Url: www.bioethismscience.org The "Cosmo-planetary and terrestrial meta-dynamics systemicity”, the “Life’s meta-dynamics systemicity”, and "Biological meta-dynamics systemicity" are the core of a general theory resulting from a “Bioethism transdisciplinary approach” of the whole set of dynamics that made and sustains Life as to exist throughout the atomic and molecular universal cycles systemicity. Part four of this theory describes the Universe Cosmo-planetary metadynamics as having participated in the Sun system and its planets to form, particularly the Earth at the right “habitable zone”. The physicochemical environmental conditions of this site became propitious for Life to “hatch” within biochemical thermodynamics1 and evolution development metadynamics. ABSTRACT Ever since 1996, J.-J. Blanc, the author of this theory, made an extensive research on "Systems science" that induced to his developing a new systemic2 paradigm in terms of a transdisciplinary approach to "Living systems" that he named “The Bioethism” (see note 3). The transdisciplinary approach is meant to support the acquisition of a large understanding of living systems' origin, of their natural structure and their adaptive behaviors. Their specific bonds and traits, as well as their evolution trends, while permanently interacting with environmental events for survival4, require actions-reactions from ago-antagonistic signals and stimuli. Endogenous within their body milieu and exogenous, these signals and stimuli are adapting with conditions of ecosystemic and sociosystemic environments.
    [Show full text]
  • (SR&T) Program
    Final SR&T cover 5/15/03 2:41 PM Page 2 HIGHLIGHTS: THE SUPPORTING RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY PROGRAM OFFICE OF SPACE SCIENCE THE SR&T PROGRAM Final SR&T Guts 5/15/03 2:42 PM Page 1 It is a pleasure to present to you our first annual brochure on the “Highlights of the Supporting Research and Technology (SR&T) Program.” The brochure provides an overview of some of the most interesting discoveries we have made in the field of space science over the past 3 years. Our space science program boldly addresses the most fundamental questions that sci- ence can ask: how the universe began and is changing, what are the past and future of humanity, and whether we are alone. Dramatic advances in cosmology, planetary research, and solar terrestrial science have allowed us to unravel some of the mysteries behind these questions. But the universe continues to surprise us with new, unimagin- able discoveries that change our conclusions about the origin, structure, and future of the universe. The brochure highlights some of these advances. It is the first in a series of annual pub- lications we will provide on the science resulting from our SR&T program. It is an exciting read, and I hope you enjoy it. Sincerely, Edward J. Weiler NASA Associate Administrator for Space Science HIGHLIGHTS 1 THE SR&T PROGRAM Final SR&T Guts 5/15/03 2:42 PM Page 3 SUPPORTING RESEARCH AND TECHNOLOGY The scientific exploration of the universe is a complex human enterprise that relies on a continuing supply of new questions to answer and new technologies to aid in find- ing their answers.
    [Show full text]
  • The Interstellar Medium Surrounding the Sun
    AA49CH07-Frisch ARI 5 August 2011 9:10 The Interstellar Medium Surrounding the Sun Priscilla C. Frisch,1 Seth Redfield,2 and Jonathan D. Slavin3 1Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois 60637; email: [email protected] 2Astronomy Department, Wesleyan University, Middletown, Connecticut 06459; email: sredfi[email protected] 3Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 02138; email: [email protected] Annu. Rev. Astron. Astrophys. 2011. 49:237–79 Keywords First published online as a Review in Advance on interstellar medium, heliosphere, interstellar dust, magnetic fields, May 31, 2011 interstellar abundances, exoplanets The Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics is online at astro.annualreviews.org Abstract This article’s doi: The Solar System is embedded in a flow of low-density, warm, and partially 10.1146/annurev-astro-081710-102613 ionized interstellar material that has been sampled directly by in situ mea- Copyright c 2011 by Annual Reviews. surements of interstellar neutral gas and dust in the heliosphere. Absorption All rights reserved line data reveal that this interstellar gas is part of a larger cluster of local 0066-4146/11/0922-0237$20.00 interstellar clouds, which is spatially and kinematically divided into addi- by Wesleyan University - CT on 01/05/12. For personal use only. tional small-scale structures indicating ongoing interactions. An origin for the clouds that is related to star formation in the Scorpius-Centaurus OB association is suggested by the dynamic characteristics of the flow. Variable Annu. Rev. Astro. Astrophys. 2011.49:237-279. Downloaded from www.annualreviews.org depletions observed within the local interstellar medium (ISM) suggest an in- homogeneous Galactic environment, with shocks that destroy grains in some regions.
    [Show full text]
  • Slides First Class5
    Chapter 1 Our Place in the Universe 1 What is our place in the universe? 2 Star ! (Usually:) A large, glowing ball of gas that generates heat and light through nuclear fusion. ! The energy generated in a star is in equilibrium with the gravity of the star. ! As we will see later, there are end stages of stars (White Dwarfs, Neutron Stars) that are not balls of gas, and that are not supported by nuclear energy. 3 Planet Mars Neptune ! A moderately large celestial body that orbits a star. Mars Neptune ! A planet may be rocky, icy, or gaseous in composition. ! A planet is massive enough to be approximately spherical under its own gravity. ! A planet is not massive enough to have significant nuclear fusion; it shines by reflected light. ! A planet has cleared the neighborhood around its orbit. (IAU 2006) ... Pluto is no longer considered a planet but a dwarf planet, along with Eris and Ceres. 4 Moon (or Satellite) ! A celestial body that orbits a planet. Ganymede (orbits Jupiter) Earth and its Moon 5 Asteroid ! A relatively small and rocky object that orbits a star. ! Gravity is too small to form a sphere. Ida Asteroid Ida (with its moon Dactyl) NASA: http://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/photo_gallery/photogallery-asteroids.html Asteroid Itokawa 6 Comet ! A relatively small and icy object that orbits a star. ! Comets are very dim and cold during most of their orbit far away from the Sun. They get their spectacular tails only when they get heated up close to the Sun. ! The plasma tail points away from the Sun, being carried by the Solar Wind.
    [Show full text]
  • A Method to Determine Distances to Molecular Clouds Using Near-IR Photometry
    A&A 509, A44 (2010) Astronomy DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/200912594 & c ESO 2010 Astrophysics A method to determine distances to molecular clouds using near-IR photometry G. Maheswar1,2,C.W.Lee1,H.C.Bhatt3, S. V. Mallik3,andS.Dib4,5 1 Korea Astronomy and Space Science Institute, 61-1, Hwaam-dong, Yuseong-gu, Daejeon 305-348, Republic of Korea e-mail: [email protected]; [email protected] 2 Aryabhatta Research Institute of Observational Sciences, Manora Peak, Nainital 263 129, India 3 Indian Institute of Astrophysics, Koramangala, Bangalore 560 034, India 4 Service d’Astrophysique, DSM/Irfu, CEA/Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex, France 5 Lebanese University, Faculty of Sciences, Department of Physics, El-Hadath, Beirut, Lebanon Received 29 May 2009 / Accepted 23 September 2009 ABSTRACT Aims. We aim to develop a method to determine distances to molecular clouds using JHK near-infrared photometry. Methods. The method is based on a technique that aids spectral classification of stars lying towards the fields containing the clouds into main sequence and giants. In this technique, the observed (J − H)and(H − Ks) colours are dereddened simultaneously using trial values of AV and a normal interstellar extinction law. The best fit of the dereddened colours to the intrinsic colours giving a minimum 2 value of χ then yields the corresponding spectral type and AV for the star. The main sequence stars, thus classified, are then utilized in an AV versus distance plot to bracket the cloud distances. Results. We applied the method to four clouds, L1517, Chamaeleon I, Lupus 3 and NGC 7023 and estimated their distances as 167 ± 30, 151 ± 28, 157 ± 29 and 408 ± 76 pc respectively, which are in good agreement with the previous distance estimations available in the literature.
    [Show full text]